1549:...and thanks to you and the 1.0 team for expediting your part of the B-class review! It naturally needed the reviews of both the meteorology and 1.0 teams to get a proper and complete upgrade to the higher rating for the article. It probably won't surprise you that my ultimate goal is to get the article to at least a GA-class since it is classed as a level 3 vital article. I did in fact nominate it for just that last August since some had been suggesting I do so. I was probably jumping the gun a little, but the nomination is still standing and has until early in the new year to be reviewed before it expires. Now that the 1.0 team is getting active again, perhaps the Wiki 1.0 part of the B-class review could be used to help the meteorology team identifiy what the next improvments to the article should be. When I compare the cloud article to the precipitation article which has a GA rating (which it already had when I first became involved with Knowledge), I see the latter article is a fair bit shorter and more concise-looking, so maybe there is a need to make some more cuts to the cloud article as well. I already moved a fair bit of secondary text to other articles to help get the B-grade, so I might find it difficult to decide if more cuts are needed and what, if anything to cut. Meteorological expertise, which I bring to the table, will be needed to make these determinations, but it will likely take editorial and organizational expertise as well, so that's where I may need further help from the 1.0 team. I hope we can work together to a reasonable degree to achieve a successful GA review.
1496:: Thanks to you and WP:Meteorology for improving the article to this level! Fairly high-level articles like this are crucial for the success of Knowledge, even though I know it's often easier to write more specialized articles. Many of our assessments (from the 1.0 team) are out of date, because this project has been fairly dormant (though we begin work next month on our next official selection). It's certainly true that any B-class article should meet the criteria; however, the idea of these assessments is that they should be done by subject experts - especially the first two criteria. If the consensus of the Meteorology project is that this is B-class, then we should certainly update our assessment (which I've done). To my eyes the article looks good enough to meet the B-class criteria, but I'll
1504:
set up for projects to use, we didn't originally have the bot to automate things, so only a few projects adopted it. However, we needed to get assessments done for articles we deemed important enough to put into our collections. Therefore we created our own talk page template and used this in cases where we needed an assessment. (Maybe someone did a bot run later, but those would be based solely on assessments by other WikiProjects.) As of now, we don't really need these tags, because since the 1.0 bot was established, pretty much every WikiProject uses the assessment scheme and there are no significant gaps to fill. When we do our next article selection for
1390:
WikiProject
Meteorology (who have given the cloud article a B-grade) probably know a fair bit more about clouds and weather than anyone at Wiki 1.0, who's dismissal of the cloud article comes with no constructive critique. In any case, there is no connection between understanding elitist jargon and making a down-to-earth assessment of an article. I've seen a fair number of other articles that have different grades or ratings from different projects for each, so maybe this article will have to settle for the same if I come to a dead end. I certainly won't bother anyone at Wiki 1.0 with my problems ever again. There are other Wikipedians I can go to for help.
1056:, etc. Of necessity, many people involved are not Knowledge editors - these are people who go to schools in Haiti giving out Knowledge content. So, do you have an alternative for where offline collections should interface with the Knowledge community? I think this page - though quiet - is still the natural home for inquiring about this work, as it has been the "home" since 2004. Now that Kiwix has updated the WP1.0 code, we can (and will) in fact produce a lot of new selections of Knowledge. This WILL involve much more contact again with WikiProjects as we did in 2006-2011, though much of the work this time will be done via email, etc.
1156:, as well as all the educational charities I mentioned above. Much of the modern activity of a group like this MUST be outside EN:WP, because it involves collaborating with a broad range of people who mostly don't work on one language version of one Wikimedia project. Many of those people are putting in several hours a week trying to get Knowledge content into schools and clinics without internet, but they are not active Wikipedians on EN:WP. Yet we need to have a presence (like this page) on EN:WP precisely for the transparency reasons you mention.
4475:
31:
1204:
lists, IRC channels, regional meet-ups, national and international conferences, plus unofficial split-off projects like
Wikimedia Deutschland or whatever it's proper name is, that have led to officially sanctioned "big deal" work, like WikiData. So, don't be alarmed. Yes, anything involving humans will generate some politics, inevitably. We'll just deal with it as it arises, like usual. What actually brought me here was that
849:
rating on the article talk page, then there's always a small chance that someone will revert you or that the article will change significantly, so a separate list is helpful in this instance.) It doesn't all have to be done by the same person. One assessment per article is enough; even if someone only assessed 10 or 20, or did the ones that they thought were easy, then that alone would be hugely helpful. Feel free to
3171:
aware that I haven't updated the page much since our
Hackathon in 2017. Unfortunately, I haven't had the time to spend a day rewriting the page to reflect the new situation properly, or even to do my part to help support the coders. Right now, there's a lot of work going on (not by me!) rewriting the bot, and there is regular contact between active participants (2-3 times per month), and almost daily emails.
2861:- Our people are working on fixing the code as time allows, but we haven't seen any progress as yet. Also, they are working on writing completely new code, to try and avoid the problems we've been having. In the meantime, you can request a one-off log update, and I think those are still working, if you need one urgently. Once I hear of significant progress, I'll update - but the best place to check is the
3456:
2223:
4535:
3705:
427:
4217:
4003:
1000:(same on its subpages) and it's banner "ad" mentioned at the top of this talk page retired. We should not be drawing editorial attention to something that isn't really "a thing" any more. While there is some intermittent discussion on this page, all of it (other than about how moribund the WP 1.0 thing is) would be better held in another venue.
4585:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4407:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4369:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3765:
4334:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4299:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4190:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4155:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4117:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4044:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3976:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3855:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3428:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
2826:
As of this writing, that link works just fine and a random check of assessments from various pages generated by the tool shows that it's keeping up with changes in assessments. It's the logs I came here to show concern for. The log for the WP I mainly do assessments for was last updated on
November
1159:
I don't have unlimited time. I've been reluctant to put a lot of time into updating this page because I've naively expected "false dawns" before (of new people reinvigorating WP1.0 )- people promising a lot who haven't followed through, etc. However, if you look at our hackathon signup page you can
1147:
to many people who have signed onto this project to try and reinvigorate their interest. I've also been trying to recruit someone to help oversee the bot; at present, the only person doing that is from the French
Knowledge. The problem is that once we lost our main coding person (and bot admin), we
3170:
No! The project has changed, and we don't really produce specific collections in the same way - we work to guide and support offline work, and to connect end users with the technical people; that's much harder to write up on a page than the "Version X" collections that we used to put together. I'm
1889:
These article collections are being used in places such as schools as a major source of reference material. Kiwix provides a search box and some index terms, but there is no overall index to use for browsing. Article categories provide some structure, but can lead to wrong general categorisation.
1178:
accept your criticism that there is a lot more work to be done on these WP1.0 pages for these to reflect where we are now. I have done some work already trying to figure out the active participants. I will endeavour to do a complete rewrite of this main 1.0 page in the next week to make it reflect
848:
Technical details: Just type your assessment for the article on EpochFail's page, so he knows what your rating was. The link takes you to a specific revision of the article, and it's important to assess that revision instead of the current one (else the software will be confused). (If you put the
3088:
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you?
2620:
Hi there! I am a PhD student from the Czech
Republic and I do my research on Knowledge (assesing quality of articles). I would like to ask you how the SelectionBot works in terms of quality? I mean how it categorize articles to A,B,C category. I know the criteria of quality on Knowledge, but I dont
1897:
Our goal is to provide an index that can be used to browse for general concepts that are less easily found via text searches. For example, to find FrƩdƩric Chopin one may simply search for "Chopin" - but what if the question is "What are some famous Polish musicians and composers?" An index might
284:
Hi, concerning B+ class-- I think it's a little ambiguous as it stands right now. B class is so much more descriptive with its six criteria, whereas B+ class sounds like B class without the criteria. There are obviously some differences; for example, B+ mentions clear in its description, but in the
1503:
The 1.0 assessment tags getting to be redundant at this point, except for historical purposes (see the earlier discussion on this talk page). I should explain the origin of the 1.0 assessments (which I set up) - at least how I remember it (it was 11-12 years ago!). When the assessment scheme was
1350:
Thankyou for your clarification; I've check out the links you suggested and that part of the process is now clear to me. However, you also say I need to ensure that all B-class criteria are met to override the default C-class. I have already done that informally for the upgrades initiated by the
1265:
The
Knowledge article 'Cloud' has recently been raised from C- to B-class by the 2 wiki projects that claim an interest in the article, but remains stuck at C-class on the part of Knowledge 1.0. This might not be a problem if all 3 interested parties had 1 vote each, but I see that Wiki 1.0 has 3
700:
works? I couldnāt find anyone from Wiki-Oregon team who knows how it works. All of the articles shown as needing assessments were rated at least a month ago; and since then, nothing has been added or dropped from the matrix. Bottomline ā¦ it looks like the matrix is dead in the water. Sorry, if
1564:
I don't think I can really give you many good pointers on GAN; I used to do a few GA reviews in around 2007-2008 but the expectations are much different (and higher!) now. What I would suggest, though, is to get someone else from the
Meteorology project to look over it. I've never written an FA
1238:
Thanks for clarification. The project was fairly dead from 2013-2016, other than for maintaining the assessment scheme and the bot which is well-used. I wouldn't have any objection to WP:CORE being switched to another use; the Core Topics project was one from the very early days, which was very
202:
The "latest" product was 0.8 which came out in March 2011. Even with
Knowledge's glacial pace of change on policy and direction, 5 years is a lot of ground to make up for. And I haven't seen any evidence that WMF will step in and provide any staff to restart the process. We should declare this a
1203:
Quick mass reply: If this project is actually active then either this page should be maintained, or marked historical and a pointer given to the current coordination page, whether that's here, at Meta, or whatever. Lots of WP- and
Wikimedia-related work is done off the wikis; there are mailing
4482:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Knowledge (
1389:
Judging by the latent hostility of you last comment, it looks like I've touched a raw nerve of a type I've encountered before among the more elite Wikipedians. Yes, I'm a junior editor who can easily be dismissed by those who are higher up on the food chain. However, I and my colleagues at
669:
You're right that our icon was designed for when we did releases on CD or DVD. There are a group of us that are becoming active again, and we are working to produce another collection. The main difference is that many of the people involved come from outside the English WP community, e.g.,
372:
There never was any authority in the editorial team here. Some people designed a grading system but never revised it after seeing it in practice. This is not a system that exists backed by any logic or experience, so lots of things about it make no sense except as the legacy of a theoretical
2129:
Unfortunately, it's a lot of work - the bot had to be switched to a new server, and there are some difficult bugs to work out - plus, he has to do it in his free time from his day job. So it will take a while, unless there's someone else with the tech skills who can work on it full time.
844:
trying to get an automated system for class assessment together, and I know it would be hugely helpful to your sideloading project, since so many class assessments are out of date. This could really be a case of spending one hour now and saving yourself hundreds of hours later.
2621:
understand, how the bot really works. It assess quality based on users experience with article or it does automatically. The question is if the assesing quality of articles (A,B,C, start, stub) is made by human or by bot? I will be very glad for the answer and my research too!--
1035:
into the foundation to support our work. Earlier this week people from Kiwix completed a rewrite on the WP1.0 bot code used to generate offline selections. I have personally put in about 20 hours in the past week to work on offline Knowledge - but none of that was coordinated
3371:, which is correctly DEFAULTSORTed as "Taylor, Dean". This means that in print there will be two identical entries, one a redirect and the other the DAB page which it targets. IMO it should be unprintworthy by default, but accept a printworthy parameter in like manner to e.g.
1170:
approved yesterday. Kiwix and collaborators have done a lot of great (and difficult!) coding work recently to make the WP1.0 project viable again, so I think I can safely say that this is no false dawn - this is a genuine (and, frankly, very exciting) renaissance of our
2302:
as an example for a functional analogous category. But we'd have to wait 1-2 days to see if the bot creates new assessment tables with the newly corrected category structure and correct display of values. It should in theory, but it's a bit too early to say for sure.
1977:
Use this to create an index, or a categorization of articles. It could build upon the already existing category tag system, but it doesn't need to. It could use things like similarity in wiki-links to known topics, wiki-data, intro paragraphs, word counts, etc.
1618:
Strange that I missed this post, despite being here a few times recently - I apologize. Funny - I was just wondering this same thing tonight. This information was useful at one time, but I suspect it's not needed now. Their main use is in being able to search
2784:
Thanks for the workaround. I've commented out the template link to the bot-imported assessment table and added a direct link to the tool-based table on our WikiProject pages. I'd advise other WikiProjects to do the same until the ownership issue is resolved.
880:
A couple of the links were bad, probably due to pages being merged in subsequent years. If you remember seeing anything odd (like a redirect page instead of an article), then please make a note of that on the page, so EpochFail can double-check them. Thanks,
250:
It's a mess. The AR-15 page has moved to colt ar-15 and it's focusing on the colt sporter line of rifles. A minor product line in the civilian ar-15 ecosystem. The AR-15 article was in, I think v0.8 and was reviewed for v1.0. Maybe change it to the m-16
2198:! We had to put things on hold since January, but now we can start work on V0.9 again. If we're lucky, you'll be getting a lot of help from ORES and/or WikiTrust. I'll be in contact in a month or so, when things will (hopefully) get busy. Thanks!
1823:
Just a note that the 0.5 and 1.0 template modifications are complete. I removed the category-related code while attempting to leave all of the other text in place. Ping me here or post on my talk page if I removed too much code from the templates. ā
802:
It's much less active than before, but we do still have a few things going on, so I've updated the Status section accordingly. If you'd like to help us with any of these activities (particularly getting the bot running again!) please let us know.
1623:
by release category, but I think the information is largely historical at this point. Both those releases have lists of the articles available as wikitext, so I think those categories could go. Let us know if you do a category for deletion.
2020:
1565:
myself, but there were probably about a dozen FAs where I contributed as part of a team of people to help it reach FA standard; GAs are easier, but still a second opinion from a subject expert could be valuable. Thanks for your dedication!
947:
1463:
So if an article does not meet the six B-class criteria for Version 1.0 Editorial Team, it is not going to be B-class - and there is no way that it can be B-class for WikiProject Meteorology either. Satisfy one, and you satisfy the other.
1266:
votes through some of its component sub-units, while the projects have only 1 vote each. Has Wiki 1.0 reviewed the recent upgrade by the wiki projects and decided to either support or out-vote them, or has that review yet to take place?
1512:
WikiProjects, so the Meteorology assessment alone would ensure its inclusion. I'm not sure if a GA reviewer would see a C-class assessment as a negative; many assessments are out of date, even on more active projects, and a reviewer
1139:- I have been updating the page to publicise things like the upcoming hackathon, and to clear out obsolete material, so I'm certainly not trying to run a secret group here! All the information is published openly. If you check my
2879:
The new code had a couple of bugs, but they have been fixed and it's now working OK on a test set of 22 projects, though it's only updating the tables for the time being. Hopefully we can get updates across all WikiProjects soon.
4183:
566:
538:
490:
2542:
3879:
2454:
2400:
1890:
WikiProject tags can also provide some means of classification. An index gives a particular type of structure and organisation to a body of knowledge. The closest to an index for the online Knowledge can be found at
629:
If this project is active, the people running it should consider changing the icon. It shows a CD, which is becoming outdated as a media format, and the old Knowledge logo, which was retired almost seven years ago.
1106:
and colleagues to support this project. I can agree that some feedback here would be useful, but I am sure you would be accepted if you wish to get involved. A lot of work has been done here - just so you know.
3848:
4362:
1678:
No one else has commented, which may imply little interest, but if it's not difficult then by all means go ahead and initiate WP:CFD. If there's something I've overlooked this may well show it. Thanks,
1043:
is no longer the main venue; but we have weekly Skype discussions and regular emails not instead. This group is much more diffuse now, since it's an alliance of Wikipedians, Wikimedians, and people from
2277:
is somehow configured to list only NA-Class importance articles in its lists of start-class articles, rather than start-class articles across importance categories. How should we go about fixing this?
1881:
We would very much like to have an index for future releases, including Version 0.9 which is just beginning at this time. This section of the talk page is for people to share ideas and test results.
4578:
3242:
marks all those redirects as printworthy but I don't think that's accurate: lots of cities are only in one state or it would be trivial to find the city entry you're looking for in a print edition. ā
1898:
list such things - under both music and Poland. This would allow the user to explore the available content based on general concepts, rather than simply doing specific "Google-type" text searches.
4037:
3466:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RFC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the
1351:
Wikki projects. Unfortunately, the instructions for filling out the formal checklist contain some jargon I don't understand, so I'll need some help or clarification to do that. Many thanks!
743:
We're trying to find someone new who can take over the maintenance of the bot. In the meantime, the former people have been contacted via email, and we'll just have to run the bot manually.
3421:
2049:
you'll see a big pink box indicating that the bot is blocked. AFAIK this is because it was creating bad page links, links that begin with two or more consecutive colons. The blocking admin,
4327:
4148:
4110:
3028:
1694:
1180:
3141:
Looking at the project page listing the last release at over a decade ago. Some sort of overhaul of the content would be good to give folks an idea of where this is up to would be good...
1167:
1446:, and it has the same six requirements for B-class as Version 1.0 Editorial Team - indeed, if you click the "" link after "More detailed criteria", those six criteria are word-for-word
1431:), mostly in the form of a checklist where none of the criteria are optional. By contrast, C-class and below (start, stub) are very much subjective and at the whims of different people.
1148:
couldn't produce new collections, so many of our active WP:1.0 Wikipedians moved onto other things. But that doesn't mean that the work doesn't need to be done; in fact there is now a
188:
have begun working with us. Very little is happening on this page just yet, but that should change in the next few months. They're hoping to present the project at Wikimania in June.
3796:
I'll start by saying that I have never been a member of this project (aka a noob, please be kind), but I have seen it in passing since the early days. My question, which is similar to
3081:! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the
2936:
Thanks for update. Looks like it has been running regularly with no obvious problems for last month, apart from a missing one on 2 April. So I would go for all projects when you can.
1920:
Geographical - organisation by place. Many articles are about people or events that relate to specific places, and we tend to think of Galileo as Italian, Confucius as Chinese, etc.
1312:" row, you will see a "" link at the right. Click that, and you will see that the box now has several more rows, one of which says "This article has not yet been checked against the
3276:
2636:
I posted some basic information on your user talkpage (without technical details). It got a bit lengthyĀ :), so I moved it over to your userspace - hope it helps with your research.
184:@DexDor - Actually, it just got resurrected. The problem we had was that our main tech person quit the project. However, in the last month a group of developers from groups like
4546:
2991:
2295:
4400:
3969:
2239:
436:
72:
67:
59:
1411:
I'm not intending to be hostile, I'm trying to explain why it's not necessarily a good idea to assess an article as B-class. My point is that if you assess above C-class, you
4292:
2299:
1456:
285:
long run I think B+ needs something else to differentiate itself a little. Or we could just leave it be as a class that isn't adopted on the large scale, like A class.
128:
2364:
I noticed there was a thread earlier about the bot being down. I checked that out, and saw that the bot was live again and making contributions. However, the log at
333:(in the second section of ratings). My apologies-- I meant to hold this discussion on the Assessment talk page, not this main talk page, but suppose both will work.
4453:
I have rated it as B-class. You are welcome to check and revert for this project if you disagree, but please leave reasons and actionable comments if you do. Ā· Ā· Ā·
2862:
2688:
1314:
967:
722:
458:
330:
1081:; as soon as people start discussing Knowledge matters off-wiki, we get cliques, in-crowds ("we don't know you, so we won't let you post here"), secret societies,
4483:
2657:
2827:
4, 2018. There have been lengthy gaps like that before, but it causes me to wonder if this is one more subproject that's slowly going the way of the dinosaurs.
2298:
didn't work for a hybrid project assessment (using both quality and importance in 1 category). See the edit history of this cat for my change - I simply used
1697:. I think I will hold off on nominating V0.7 until I can get a sense of whether, as you said, there are any considerations we may be overlooking. Thanks! --
1443:
651:
This project concept is from that era and so far as I know, has not updated its scope. This is a historic project that has a legacy but halted 7+ years ago.
465:. The assessment part of the "Version 1.0 Editorial Team" has been its own thing for years while the "distribution on CD" component is not relevant anymore.
1442:) are the originals, from which the assessment schemes of virtually all other WikiProjects are derived. The assessment scale for WikiProject Meteorology is
874:
Yes- I'll aim to do some of these this weekend. That's a very interesting idea! I agree that many assessments are out of date. 03:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
2023:
page shows that it hasn't been updated since November 30. It used to update every day or two. Has it been modified to only update once a month? Thank you.
1645:
No worries, and thank you for responding. Since the categories are wholly template-populated, technically they could be depopulated and deleted without a
1239:
useful at the time, but the main protagonist stopped work on that in around 2006. Once the bot assessment scheme took off, and we also independently got
3283:
3385:
2432:
1839:
Thanks! I'll take a look in the next day or two just to double-check, and also take care of any additional cleanup that may be required. Also pinging
169:
47:
17:
2687:
We're beginning work on a new version of the WP1.0 Bot. We want to hear from people who are regular users of the bot. Please see the discussion at
2661:
2324:
Thanks, appreciate it. I tried to look into it to fix it myself but there were too many layers of templates and I didn't want to muck something up.
2770:
Not only bookmarked on a laptop, but also a desktop. Anyone doing this must remember to call each of the bookmarks differently to avoid confusion.
3090:
1554:
1395:
1356:
1271:
697:
4582:
4404:
4366:
4331:
4296:
4187:
4152:
4114:
4041:
3973:
3852:
3800:, is of what happened to this project and why its original release date has been delayed for over a decade. What happened? I'm just curious. ā
3425:
1558:
1497:
1275:
1166:, and with three current & past WMF board members + one WMF manager attending the event it's clearly relevant to the WMF mission. We got
127:), Adam Holt and others on new code to generate article selections. There is a lively discussion taking place at Wikimania - for details see
2233:, which is within the scope of this wikiproject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the
1415:
be able to show that the article meets all of the requirements for the chosen class. Every class above C has a defined set of requirements (
3715:
1435:
1301:
2714:
is blocked, there is a way to get current article counts (assessment wikitable) for your WikiProjects. Follow the two-step process below.
3335:
2436:
2244:
2060:
1955:
530:
3085:
that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
1738:), if the discussion ends with a consensus to delete the categories. That would still leave the templates intact on article talk pages.
4542:
3317:
I suppose it would be best for the aforementioned templates to default to unprintworthy but accept a parameter for overriding this. --
1859:
1550:
1483:
1406:
1391:
1352:
1283:
1267:
3737:
4586:
4479:
4408:
4370:
4335:
4300:
4191:
4156:
4118:
4068:
4045:
3977:
3856:
3429:
2258:
1891:
1224:
1012:
366:
3014:
3910:
3748:
2046:
1451:
1439:
1365:
If you don't understand it, then perhaps you shouldn't be assessing articles for quality - certainly not above C-class anyway. --
462:
4272:
3938:
3468:
3058:
regarding an editor who is or was making rapidfire importance assessments to articles. Your feedback would be helpful. Thanks,
2840:
1209:
4179:
3499:
3477:
3375:
3236:
3160:
2380:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Knowledge:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Comics_articles_by_quality_log&action=history
1598:
919:
2990:
I've boldly nominated this template for deletion as it no longer appears to serve any functional purpose: see discussion at
1179:
where we are now. All help is very welcome, and if you're interested in offline work and outreach please join the effort -
3562:- US independence & republic; Britain the biggest US trade partner & finances US expanding business & Treasury
2500:
Sorry I didn't see your message. Last week, I had gone through and assessed a large number of the unassessed articles for
2915:
It seems that all is going smoothly now, so we're planning to switch things over completely to the new Python code soon.
2403:
has not been updated since 3 January 2018. There were articles tagged yesterday so would have expected an overnight run.
4467:
3924:
3587:- British-American insurrection in continental North America, Anglo-Bourbon (Fr.&Sp.) War-across worldwide empires,
782:
151:
3113:
1243:, it became less important anyway. I was planning to start work on a revamp of these pages starting tomorrow. Cheers,
3260:
2368:
has not been updated in nearly a month. Is this a problem on our end? Please do ping me with a response. Thanks much.
1928:
Chronological - as mentioned above, many articles relate to people or events, which also have specific points in time
1102:
I can attest to the amount of work that has been put in to this - the entire article rating system was initiated by
4252:
3082:
1590:
990:
As noted above, "This is a historic project that has a legacy but halted 7+ years ago." This should be tagged with
4598:
4563:
4520:
4495:
4460:
4443:
4420:
4382:
4347:
4312:
4277:
4231:
4203:
4168:
4130:
4095:
4076:
4057:
4022:
3989:
3953:
3886:
3868:
3833:
3810:
3797:
3785:
3756:
3690:
3503:
3488:
3481:
3462:
3444:
3438:
3400:
3326:
3269:
3223:
3198:
3180:
3164:
3131:
3102:
3067:
3040:
3003:
2978:
2945:
2924:
2903:
2889:
2874:
2845:
2820:
2794:
2779:
2763:
2700:
2677:
2645:
2630:
2609:
2587:
2561:
2522:
2508:
2484:
2466:
2448:
2426:
2412:
2391:
2372:
2349:
2328:
2312:
2281:
2263:
2229:
2214:
2207:
2184:
2153:
2139:
2124:
2110:
2096:
2075:
2032:
2009:
1990:
1962:
1871:
1847:
1833:
1803:
1767:
1753:
1719:
1701:
1688:
1673:
1633:
1605:
1574:
1526:
1476:
1399:
1377:
1360:
1338:
1252:
1233:
1192:
1119:
1097:
1065:
1021:
979:
959:
936:
890:
868:
812:
786:
752:
738:
710:
683:
664:
642:
615:
585:
557:
524:
509:
478:
451:
407:
386:
360:
342:
316:
294:
274:
260:
235:
213:
197:
178:
158:
140:
113:
38:
4224:
4210:
3495:
3473:
1144:
833:
3780:
3322:
2234:
1309:
1032:
4480:
Knowledge talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter
4516:
4164:
4091:
3844:
3829:
3711:
3686:
3264:
3219:
2974:
2054:
1931:
Data-based versions of the above, for example Dewey Decimal (for topical) or geolocation (for Geographical).
1085:("this change wasn't agreed on the Facebook forum, so it should be reverted"), bad feeling and rejection. --
4072:
877:
Thanks to several people helping out, we've got most of them done. I think there's just 12 left to go now.
4439:
4010:
3996:
3588:
3355:
3126:
886:
864:
674:
planned after Wikimania this year with about 12-15 developers; I'll update the page when I get some time.
659:
610:
473:
381:
311:
230:
4457:
4358:
3646:
3396:
3194:
2816:
2790:
2255:
2237:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
2181:
1840:
1741:
From a template perspective, is it more useful to have a notice for V0.5 articles similar to the one at
1594:
1586:
1305:
1221:
1009:
256:
209:
1914:
Alphabetical - this is easy to produce, but probably has the least value when a search box is available
4486:), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks!
2144:
I'm sorry. I didn't realize there was so much involved with this. Thank you for clearing it up a bit.
1799:" I am not sure if one or the other is preferred, or if it's best just to leave the banners alone. --
369:
uses. I think the only group which would know anything about this rank is the one at that WikiProject.
4431:
3904:
3752:
3613:
3556:: independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure
3547:
3433:
3345:
2178:
770:
265:
We're actually working on a new selection now, for V0.9, so I'll bear your comment in mind. Thanks!
185:
4538:
4527:
3021:
1728:
1663:
541:. Probably a bug in the bot-script that no one is able to fix. Thx again and happy editing in 2017,
93:
4574:
4416:
4268:
4256:
3949:
3932:
3775:
3744:
3622:
independence, British evacuation, territory to Mississippi-navigation, Newfoundland-fish & cure
3318:
2984:
2834:
2775:
2751:
2641:
2626:
2396:
Does not appear to be running on any of the logs I watch, the last one alphabetically would be for
2345:
2340:, I was getting impatient and did a manual refresh of the assessment tableĀ :). New values seem OK.
2308:
2071:
1829:
1707:
1653:
1472:
1373:
1334:
1093:
994:
670:
Internet-in-a box, and WP is just one part of the overall collection needed. For example, we have
580:
552:
504:
447:
633:
My own graphic design skills are pretty much zero, so unfortunately I cannot offer my own help. --
4512:
4339:
4160:
4087:
4033:
4014:
3825:
3682:
3215:
3176:
3154:
3098:
3063:
2970:
2920:
2885:
2870:
2759:
2696:
2604:
2582:
2556:
2518:
2203:
2149:
2135:
2120:
2106:
2092:
2050:
2028:
2005:
1986:
1867:
1763:
1715:
1684:
1629:
1570:
1522:
1248:
1188:
1061:
925:
808:
748:
679:
520:
403:
356:
338:
290:
270:
193:
136:
109:
3027:
banner I believe they should be renamed accordingly for the sake of clarity. See discussion at
602:
or the bot's operators. I do not think there is support here in this WikiProject for that bot.
219:
4435:
4255:. Not least because this affects ~17% of all pages, I would appreciate input and/or review at
3592:
3119:
2941:
2899:
2549:
I don't know how to check if it is running or not so I'm hoping you can check it out. Thanks.
2480:
2444:
2408:
1844:
1800:
1750:
1698:
1670:
1613:
1602:
975:
955:
882:
860:
829:
734:
652:
638:
603:
466:
393:
374:
324:
304:
223:
101:
3029:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 September 24#Knowledge vital articles by quality
515:
I'm not sure what happened, but it seems someone got the bot working again. Happy New Year!
4454:
4343:
3918:
3801:
3392:
3190:
2856:
2812:
2786:
2669:
2501:
2462:
2422:
2387:
2365:
2274:
2250:
1968:
Use the program to classify new articles (or articles that haven't been assessed in awhile).
1917:
Topical - organisation by subject area, for example "organic chemistry" or "classical music"
1797:
This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Knowledge.
1785:
This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Knowledge.
1424:
1416:
1319:
1215:
1134:
1003:
832:, are you interested?), can you make some time to run through the short list of articles at
778:
706:
252:
204:
4594:
4378:
4308:
4228:
4199:
4126:
4053:
3985:
3900:
3864:
3417:
3409:
3256:
3078:
2472:
2397:
2193:
2175:
1428:
1420:
1112:
599:
155:
1077:
It all sounds a bit dodgy to me. Knowledge matters should be discussed transparently and
1710:, too, or else the categories may get recreated. Would you know how to do that safely?
1212:; in the process I noticed that this page also appeared to indicate a moribund project.
1162:
4558:
4506:
4412:
4323:
4262:
4245:
4144:
4137:
4106:
3942:
3928:
3211:
3036:
2999:
2852:
2828:
2771:
2747:
2637:
2622:
2505:
2369:
2341:
2335:
2325:
2319:
2304:
2289:
2278:
2082:
2064:
2000:
Once we have agreed on an approach, this section can be used to plan the implentation.
1825:
1788:
1780:
1746:
1742:
1491:
1465:
1384:
1366:
1345:
1327:
1205:
1153:
1126:
1086:
841:
593:
571:
543:
495:
440:
1669:. However, I am not averse to starting a deletion discussion if that is preferred. --
1140:
3820:
A discussion which may be of interest to members of this WikiProject can be found at
3487:
Which of two (2) titles should be chosen to define the scope of the existing article
3448:
3172:
3150:
3144:
3094:
3059:
3055:
3051:
2931:
2916:
2881:
2866:
2755:
2692:
2600:
2578:
2552:
2514:
2294:, I probably fixed the error. It seems like the categorization and template usage in
2199:
2145:
2131:
2116:
2102:
2088:
2040:
2024:
2001:
1982:
1907:
1863:
1774:
1759:
1711:
1680:
1646:
1640:
1625:
1566:
1544:
1518:
1244:
1184:
1103:
1082:
1072:
1057:
912:
853:
825:
804:
744:
675:
516:
399:
352:
334:
300:
286:
266:
189:
132:
105:
3535:
British & US Congress with their respective allies, auxiliaries & combatants
2658:
Template talk:Importance/colour#Color scheme doesn't meet accessibility requirements
2101:
Kelson is working on fixing the problem, but it'll take a couple of weeks at least.
767:
If this project is still active, the status section of the page should be updated.
348:
4490:
2937:
2910:
2895:
2476:
2440:
2404:
1517:
make their judgement based on the article, not a 5-10 year old assessment. Cheers,
1240:
971:
951:
929:
730:
648:
634:
493:
has not been updated since November. It would be great if it could run again. Thx,
437:
Knowledge talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment#Requested move 29 January 2017
97:
1028:
671:
3914:
3821:
3368:
2734:
2665:
2536:
2495:
2458:
2418:
2383:
2021:
Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/U.S. road transport articles by quality log
948:
Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Event Venues articles by quality statistics
797:
774:
721:
The BOT has been down since early February, take a look at the various posts at
718:
702:
174:
124:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2894:
Thanks for the update, waiting with anticipation for the next set of projects.
2662:
Template talk:Class/colour#Color scheme doesn't meet accessibility requirements
4590:
4374:
4304:
4195:
4122:
4049:
3981:
3894:
3883:
3860:
3243:
2811:
are not running ... links to this server just hang and (eventually) timeout.
1108:
950:
has not been updated since 2010 - could someone possibly update it? Thanks. --
908:
152:
requested move to change numerous article titles which contain Dr. King's name
4554:
4396:
4388:
3965:
3601:
British & US Congress, France, Spain, Dutch Republic, Kingdom of Mysore
3032:
2995:
1791:, on the other hand, contains a banner (collapsed by default) that states, "
1758:
Sorry, I couldn't see what you're referring to - can you elaborate? Thanks,
3678:
2382:. Please give details (links) about what is not updated and why it should.
2087:, thank you for clearing that up. I wondered what happened to the updates.
1318:
for B-Class status". That row has its own "" link; you need to ensure that
2689:
Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index#Third_generation_WP1.0_bot
2547:
Bot last ran on Aug. 15th. Wondering if it has stopped or just backlogged?
491:
Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Solar System articles by quality log
172:
says things like "we will probably aim to release Version 1.0 in 2013.".
4216:
4002:
3017:
and subcategories for renaming; since these are used exclusively by the
2543:
Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Catholicism articles by quality log
726:
2730:
is there may be considerable wait time. After completion, run step two.
2719:
1971:
Human can confirm that the program's article classification is correct.
1724:
Yes, I can modify the template's category logic (and also the logic of
1620:
3880:
Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Userboxes articles by quality log
3628:: Gibraltar, Jamaica, Majorca, expand Gambia trade, expand India trade
1027:
The group is in fact very active - just not on this page. There is a
4288:
1208:
goes to a dead project page, and would be better usurped to point at
3649:, Spanish Majorca, French Gambia, further decline of Dutch Republic
3189:
Maybe the project should be rebranded and the 1.0 project shutdown?
2746:
Both of these processes can be bookmarked on your laptop. Credit to
2471:
It appears to have triggered and picked up lots of back changes for
1779:
Sorry for not replying sooner - I accidentally unwatched this page.
1454:, except that the latter also has the phrase "The article meets the
2992:
Knowledge:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 31#Template:V0.5
529:
Yes indeed. Very much appreciated. I also noticed that the article
1505:
1045:
900:
725:. For the time being you can run it manually whenever you want at
1793:
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
1585:
Is there still a need for the category structure that exists for
420:
Requested move of Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
1053:
1049:
4581:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the
4403:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the
4365:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the
2063:), should be able to point to where this is being discussed. --
4067:
Data always on each and every day no time to stay stay logged
3699:
2966:
430:
222:
for some initial documentation on a legacy / related project.
25:
4505:
An RfC of possible interest to this WikiProject can be found
1787:" However, the banner does not add any categories for WP1.0.
303:
Where any +/- system documented? I have never heard of this.
4215:
4001:
3529:- British-American insurrection in continental North America
4330:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
4295:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
4186:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
4151:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
4113:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
4040:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
3972:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
3851:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
3581:- uses 'vast majority of sources' found in a browser search
3424:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
2115:
Thank you for the update, but that seems like a long time.
2019:
Is the bot that updates the pages broken? For example, the
1508:, we will (as before) be basing the selection on data from
4013:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ā
3295:
as an example of an unnecessary comma-separated qualifier.
4225:
Talk:Modesto Area Express#Requested move 18 February 2022
4211:
Talk:Modesto Area Express#Requested move 18 February 2022
2652:
Accessibility issues with "Importance" and "Class" colors
2435:
though that was on 22 January, but there was a change to
2269:
Incorrect category link at assessment chart for WP:COMICS
4259:. Please respond there, or ping me if you respond here.
4227:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1149:
3822:
Talk:Nazism#Paragraph dealing with NSDAP-DNVP relations
3363:
3310:
3304:
3299:
3291:
2439:
from 16 January that should have appeared in the logs.
2379:
1296:
1290:
3277:
Category:Redirects from more specific geographic names
2969:
RfC may be of interet to the members of this project.
2475:
but other that I watch do not appear to have updated.
1940:
Some ideas suggested so far (these overlap somewhat):
347:
The formatting for wikilinking the category is wonky.
3485:
3275:
This probably applies to all the templates that feed
2296:
Category:Start-Class Comics articles of NA-importance
1892:
Knowledge:Directories_and_indexes#Encyclopedia_proper
1843:(who closed the discussion) to keep him apprised. --
1500:- if there's any dispute, then I'll revert my change.
104:) 21:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC) I replied at that page.
4011:
Talk:Telecommunication#Requested move 13 August 2021
3997:
Talk:Telecommunication#Requested move 13 August 2021
3640:
wider east-Indian sub-continent sphere of influenced
2808:
727:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/enwp10/cgi-bin/update.fcgi
4086:When is the next release supposed to happen? Best,
3214:may be of interest to the members of this project.
2597:I was able to review Aug.16 to 20th logs. Regards,
2174:I can help with reviewing revisions for vandalism.
1965:
of those articles that would help to classify them.
1862:, to merge A, B, C and Start-class into one level.
4545:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
3523:- used at this WP article and sisters for 19 years
1749:? Or, is there no need to mention V0.5 at all? --
485:Bot stalled (Solar System articles by quality log)
2300:Category:C-Class Comics articles of NA-importance
1031:, which is proving popular. We actually have a
3077:Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the
1924:In addition to these, others may be considered:
698:Oregon articles by quality and importance matrix
146:Requested move proposal, Martin Luther King, Jr.
3634:- free trade with North America & Caribbean
2513:Thanks a lot Kelson! I know how busy you are!
968:Knowledge talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index
723:Knowledge talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index
569:have stalled again. Can that problem be fixed?
459:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
331:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
4548:the entry on the Templates for discussion page
3882:, nothing has been listed. What did I miss? --
2803:December 21, 2018 - enwp10 not running, again.
2722:page, choose your Wikiproject & click the
2567:Bot not running? - last ran on August 15, 2018
2504:, and the log had not updated in a few weeks.
1261:Knowledge article 'Cloud'; B-class or C-class?
899:Discussion of significant changes to featured
3677:Members of this Project may be interested in
1143:, you can see I even wrote personal messages
457:The outcome of this was that in January 2017
8:
4432:User talk:LlywelynII#Top-importance articles
4257:Template talk:Class#Move to Lua/JSON version
3229:Printworthy settings of a template are wrong
3089:We have collected all of these questions at
3015:Category:Knowledge vital articles by quality
2737:page, choose your Wikiproject and click the
2457:, will try to have a look in the next days.
1854:Discussion on changing the assessment scheme
565:As of 3 February 2017, the daily updates of
3913:) so have you contacted the bot operators,
3696:Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2021
2593:Thanks to whoever fixed the bot logs. With
2573:Bot running again--but not for certain WPs?
2360:Bot running again--but not for certain WPs?
1981:Please post other ideas to the above list.
1734:, which also populates these categories if
970:, seems to be the correct place for it. --
942:Event Venues articles by quality statistics
123:Mark Roden has been working with Emmanuel (
96:could really use your input and expertise.
4478:You are invited to join the discussion at
907:Please come participate in the discussion
768:
3073:Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
2433:Drighlington and Adwalton railway station
1858:People here may wish to give comments on
1260:
170:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/FAQs
18:Knowledge talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team
4223:There is a requested move discussion at
4009:There is a requested move discussion at
1581:Version 0.5 & 0.7 category structure
701:this isnāt the right place to inquire.--
4318:Featured Article Review: Andrew Jackson
3899:It's a bot-built report, maintained by
3741:
1323:
837:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3661:- Michael Clodfelter, more to follow
3513:
3510:
2417:Example of article tagged yesterday?
1326:will override the default C-class. --
7:
3716:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team
3514:B. "War of the American Revolution"
1693:I started a CfD nomination for V0.5
1436:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team
1302:Knowledge Version 1.0 Editorial Team
1152:outside EN:WP than when we produced
567:Solar System articles by quality log
365:This seems like a system which only
3093:where you can leave your response.
2437:Wetherby Racecourse railway station
1434:The assessment criteria set out by
1181:especially if you're good with bots
531:List of Mars-crossing minor planets
4174:Monarchy in the United Kingdom FAR
3114:meta:Internet-in-a-Box/Summit-2019
3108:Conference in Boston November 2019
24:
3960:Notice of Featured Article Review
3568:Britannica for the general reader
3284:R from unnecessary disambiguation
2754:) for this helpful contribution.
2217:has been nominated for discussion
1649:by editing the category logic of
367:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
4533:
4473:
3763:
3703:
3595:-Indian subcontinent & Ocean
3511:A. "American Revolutionary Warā
3454:
3386:R from incomplete disambiguation
3298:I first noticed this issue when
3289:, which is unprintworthy, gives
2809:https://tools.wmflabs.org/enwp10
2571:Greetings, See above section at
2221:
1783:contains a banner that states, "
1452:Knowledge:WikiProject assessment
1440:Knowledge:WikiProject assessment
463:Knowledge:WikiProject assessment
425:
164:Is this initiative still active?
92:If anyone here is still active,
29:
3839:FAR for Polar coordinate system
3314:but haven't fixed it there yet.
2718:Generate new project data - At
2616:Question about assesing quality
1706:We will need to edit or delete
859:me if you have any questions.
4383:20:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
4241:I'm working towards upgrading
4180:Monarchy of the United Kingdom
3574:- 15 Pulitzer history winners
3300:fixing a printability conflict
3181:02:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
3165:20:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
3041:19:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
2726:button. Depending on how busy
2678:16:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
2656:Please see the discussions at
1996:Implementation and action plan
1936:Methods for preparing an index
1910:, we prepared three indices:
1768:05:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
1754:03:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
1720:02:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
1702:17:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
1689:11:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
1674:17:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
1634:06:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
1599:Category:Knowledge Version 0.7
1591:Category:Knowledge Version 0.5
696:Does anyone here know how the
351:to the category for B+ class.
1:
4444:20:48, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
4421:07:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
4353:FAR for Alfred Russel Wallace
4204:21:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
4169:20:08, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
4131:05:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
4096:01:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
2821:03:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
2795:17:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
2780:22:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
2764:02:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
2453:Thx, indeed it should appear
2248:
2230:Category:Bplus-Class articles
2215:Category:Bplus-Class articles
2097:18:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
2076:16:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
2045:No, if you look at the bot's
2033:23:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
2010:02:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
1991:02:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
1848:06:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
1834:17:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
1606:23:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
1575:00:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
1559:00:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
1551:ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31
1527:05:29, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
1498:confirm this with the project
1484:ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31
1477:21:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
1407:ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31
1400:13:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
1392:ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31
1378:23:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
1361:12:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
1353:ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31
1339:11:21, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
1284:ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31
1276:10:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
1268:ChrisCarss Former24.108.99.31
1213:
1001:
763:Is this project still active?
510:10:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
408:14:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
398:that makes sense, thank you!
387:16:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
361:16:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
343:16:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
317:16:27, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
295:16:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
198:05:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
179:20:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
4599:15:52, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
4579:featured article review here
4468:Knowledge:Content assessment
4401:featured article review here
4363:featured article review here
4328:featured article review here
4293:featured article review here
4184:featured article review here
4149:featured article review here
4111:featured article review here
4077:06:33, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
4058:16:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
4038:featured article review here
3970:featured article review here
3849:featured article review here
3653:reliable scholarly reference
3566:reliable scholarly reference
3504:21:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
3482:23:28, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
3439:17:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
3422:featured article review here
3199:11:29, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
3132:20:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
3103:04:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2875:18:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
2846:00:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
2701:03:10, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
2523:21:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
2509:20:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
2485:22:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
2467:01:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
2449:01:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
2427:00:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
2413:22:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
2392:20:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
2373:19:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
2146:Charlotte Allison (Morriswa)
2117:Charlotte Allison (Morriswa)
2089:Charlotte Allison (Morriswa)
2025:Charlotte Allison (Morriswa)
1872:07:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
1804:21:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
1174:Bearing all that in mind, I
966:Have moved above comment to
643:08:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
558:02:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
452:10:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
4564:15:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
4526:Nomination for deletion of
4348:21:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
4023:22:59, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
3736:In the opening sentence of
3730:to reactivate your request.
3718:has been answered. Set the
3655:for the military specialist
3401:12:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
3068:08:46, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
3004:23:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
2733:Display project table - At
2646:21:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
2631:10:55, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
2610:13:34, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
2588:12:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
2562:13:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
2350:01:28, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
2329:01:15, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
2313:01:11, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
2282:23:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
2273:The assessment template at
2154:18:48, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
2140:16:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
2125:18:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
2111:13:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
1163:we are clearly active again
1050:Learning Equality (KA Lite)
1029:meetup happening next month
525:05:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
329:, see ] and the listing at
275:17:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
261:18:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
4614:
4232:18:45, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
4028:FAR for IG Farben Building
3691:07:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
3576:
3518:
3489:American Revolutionary War
3463:American Revolutionary War
3445:American Revolutionary War
3336:R from ambiguous sort name
3327:19:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
3270:15:13, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
2904:12:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
2890:11:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
2683:Third generation WP1.0 bot
1647:formal deletion discussion
1150:much better infrastructure
891:19:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
787:03:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
739:12:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
711:01:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
684:12:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
665:15:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
616:15:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
586:13:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
479:15:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
423:
214:00:00, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
119:New article selection code
4583:featured article criteria
4521:17:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
4461:09:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
4405:featured article criteria
4367:featured article criteria
4332:featured article criteria
4313:15:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
4297:featured article criteria
4188:featured article criteria
4153:featured article criteria
4115:featured article criteria
4042:featured article criteria
3990:16:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
3974:featured article criteria
3954:08:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
3887:21:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
3874:Nothing is getting listed
3869:14:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
3853:featured article criteria
3834:02:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
3811:01:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
3786:10:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
3757:07:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
3740:, the back-to-back links
3493:discussion summarized by
3426:featured article criteria
3351:with no way of making it
3224:00:23, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
3137:Is this project inactive?
2979:02:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
2946:15:59, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
2925:12:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
2863:WP1.0 technical talk page
2264:17:30, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
2245:categories for discussion
1253:04:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
1234:00:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
1193:13:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
1120:21:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1098:19:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1066:15:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
1022:02:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
980:08:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
960:08:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
869:04:53, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
834:User:EpochFail/ORES audit
821:Need some assessment help
813:04:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
753:04:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
533:is listed erroneously on
246:AR-15 article has changed
236:13:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
159:11:14, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
141:09:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
4569:FAR for MƔrio de Andrade
4496:21:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
4278:17:36, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
3308:. I noticed the same on
1320:all six B-class criteria
1210:WP:Core content policies
692:Oregon assessment matrix
168:I'm only asking because
4063:No time for data finish
3845:Polar coordinate system
3305:Los Angeles, California
3009:Categories for renaming
2208:12:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
2185:18:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
1954:Handpick articles as a
1438:(nowadays described at
937:20:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
203:dead/inactive project.
114:05:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
94:m:Knowledge to the Moon
4543:nominated for deletion
4220:
4101:FAR for Procellariidae
4006:
3816:Discussion of interest
3616:with mercantile system
3589:Fourth Anglo-Dutch War
3550:with mercantile system
3367:redirects to DAB page
2735:Project summary tables
1450:to those described at
1300:. If you look at the "
220:meta:Internet-in-a-box
4359:Alfred Russel Wallace
4237:Template:Class update
4219:
4005:
3647:Second British Empire
3376:R from ambiguous term
3311:Boston, Massachusetts
3237:R from city and state
3212:This merge discussion
2575:for details. Thanks.
2378:Logs are update, see
1841:User:Timrollpickering
280:Criteria for B+ class
88:Knowledge to the Moon
42:of past discussions.
4253:JSON definition file
3738:Ā§Ā General background
3614:First British Empire
3548:First British Empire
3496:TheVirginiaHistorian
3474:TheVirginiaHistorian
2240:the category's entry
1457:six B-Class criteria
1041:this particular page
186:One laptop per child
150:Please comment on a
3747:. Please rephrase.
3659:prominent adherents
3572:prominent adherents
3507:
3361:. Thus for example
3331:Another example is
2720:Update project data
1288:I take it you mean
539:log mentioned above
535:every daily summary
4501:An RfC of interest
4221:
4209:Requested move at
4034:IG Farben Building
4007:
3995:Requested move at
3486:
2836:Talk to me, Billy
2431:I was thinking of
1961:Identify specific
1877:Designing an index
1141:back contributions
828:(or anyone else ā
4573:I have nominated
4562:
4395:I have nominated
4357:I have nominated
4322:I have nominated
4287:I have nominated
4251:to use Lua and a
4178:I have nominated
4143:I have nominated
4105:I have nominated
4032:I have nominated
3964:I have nominated
3843:I have nominated
3798:one asked in 2019
3734:
3733:
3665:
3664:
3593:Second Mysore War
3591:-North Atlantic,
3506:
3416:I have nominated
2706:Alternate process
2247:page. Thank you.
1956:Training dataset
1054:Internet-in-a-box
935:
789:
773:comment added by
583:
555:
507:
129:this page on Meta
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4605:
4575:MƔrio de Andrade
4552:
4537:
4536:
4494:
4477:
4476:
4449:Cataract surgery
4276:
4265:
4250:
4244:
4020:
4017:
3945:
3898:
3808:
3783:
3778:
3774:
3771:
3767:
3766:
3725:
3721:
3707:
3706:
3700:
3508:
3494:
3458:
3457:
3436:
3390:
3384:
3380:
3374:
3366:
3360:
3354:
3350:
3344:
3340:
3334:
3313:
3307:
3294:
3288:
3282:
3268:
3251:
3241:
3235:
3207:Merge discussion
3148:
3129:
3124:
3091:this Google form
3026:
3020:
2935:
2914:
2860:
2843:
2837:
2831:
2674:
2608:
2586:
2560:
2548:
2540:
2499:
2339:
2323:
2293:
2262:
2225:
2224:
2197:
2086:
2067:
2044:
1778:
1737:
1733:
1727:
1668:
1662:
1658:
1652:
1644:
1617:
1548:
1495:
1487:
1468:
1410:
1388:
1369:
1349:
1330:
1325:
1299:
1293:
1287:
1232:
1138:
1130:
1089:
1076:
1020:
999:
993:
932:
926:Talk to Nihonjoe
922:
918:
915:
911:. Thank you. Ā·Ā·Ā·
858:
852:
839:
801:
662:
657:
613:
608:
598:Perhaps contact
597:
579:
577:
575:
551:
549:
547:
503:
501:
499:
476:
471:
443:
429:
428:
397:
384:
379:
328:
314:
309:
233:
228:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4613:
4612:
4608:
4607:
4606:
4604:
4603:
4602:
4571:
4534:
4531:
4503:
4487:
4474:
4471:
4455:Peter Southwood
4451:
4428:
4393:
4391:under FA review
4355:
4320:
4285:
4263:
4260:
4248:
4242:
4239:
4214:
4176:
4141:
4103:
4084:
4065:
4030:
4018:
4015:
4000:
3962:
3943:
3892:
3876:
3841:
3818:
3802:
3794:
3781:
3776:
3772:
3764:
3762:
3723:
3719:
3704:
3698:
3679:this discussion
3675:
3469:discussion page
3459:
3455:
3452:
3434:
3418:Webley Revolver
3414:
3410:Webley Revolver
3388:
3382:
3378:
3372:
3362:
3358:
3352:
3348:
3342:
3338:
3332:
3309:
3303:
3290:
3286:
3280:
3254:
3245:
3239:
3233:
3231:
3209:
3142:
3139:
3127:
3120:
3110:
3075:
3052:this discussion
3048:
3024:
3018:
3013:I've nominated
3011:
2988:
2964:
2962:RfC of interest
2929:
2908:
2850:
2841:
2835:
2829:
2805:
2708:
2685:
2670:
2664:. Thank you. --
2654:
2618:
2598:
2576:
2569:
2550:
2546:
2534:
2493:
2362:
2333:
2317:
2287:
2271:
2226:
2222:
2219:
2191:
2176:qwerty6811Ā :-)
2172:
2080:
2065:
2038:
2017:
1998:
1938:
1904:
1887:
1879:
1856:
1772:
1735:
1731:
1725:
1666:
1660:
1656:
1650:
1638:
1611:
1583:
1542:
1489:
1481:
1466:
1404:
1382:
1367:
1343:
1328:
1322:are met before
1295:
1294:, specifically
1289:
1281:
1263:
1230:
1132:
1124:
1117:
1087:
1070:
1039:It's true that
1018:
997:
991:
988:
944:
930:
920:
913:
905:
856:
850:
823:
795:
765:
694:
660:
653:
635:Amir E. Aharoni
624:
611:
604:
600:User:WP 1.0 bot
591:
573:
572:
545:
544:
497:
496:
487:
474:
467:
441:
434:
433:
426:
422:
391:
382:
375:
322:
312:
305:
282:
248:
231:
224:
166:
148:
121:
90:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4611:
4609:
4570:
4567:
4539:Template:WP1.0
4530:
4528:Template:WP1.0
4524:
4502:
4499:
4470:
4466:Discussion at
4464:
4450:
4447:
4427:
4424:
4392:
4386:
4354:
4351:
4324:Andrew Jackson
4319:
4316:
4284:
4283:FAR for Slayer
4281:
4238:
4235:
4213:
4207:
4175:
4172:
4145:Operation Auca
4140:
4138:Operation Auca
4134:
4107:Procellariidae
4102:
4099:
4083:
4080:
4064:
4061:
4029:
4026:
3999:
3993:
3961:
3958:
3957:
3956:
3878:On this page,
3875:
3872:
3840:
3837:
3817:
3814:
3793:
3792:What happened?
3790:
3789:
3788:
3732:
3731:
3708:
3697:
3694:
3674:
3671:
3663:
3662:
3656:
3650:
3641:
3635:
3629:
3623:
3617:
3607:
3602:
3596:
3582:
3575:
3569:
3563:
3557:
3551:
3541:
3536:
3530:
3524:
3516:
3515:
3512:
3492:
3453:
3451:
3442:
3413:
3407:
3406:
3405:
3404:
3403:
3319:SoledadKabocha
3315:
3296:
3230:
3227:
3208:
3205:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3201:
3184:
3183:
3138:
3135:
3122:Blue Rasberry
3117:
3116:
3109:
3106:
3074:
3071:
3047:
3044:
3010:
3007:
2987:
2982:
2963:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2842:Transmissions
2804:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2767:
2766:
2743:
2742:
2731:
2707:
2704:
2684:
2681:
2672:
2653:
2650:
2649:
2648:
2617:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2568:
2565:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2511:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2270:
2267:
2235:categorization
2220:
2218:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2171:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2156:
2016:
2013:
1997:
1994:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1972:
1969:
1966:
1959:
1949:
1948:
1945:
1937:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1929:
1922:
1921:
1918:
1915:
1903:
1902:Types of index
1900:
1886:
1883:
1878:
1875:
1855:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1795:" as well as "
1789:Talk:Gray wolf
1781:Talk:Strontium
1747:Talk:Gray wolf
1743:Talk:Strontium
1739:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1501:
1461:
1432:
1262:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1228:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1172:
1157:
1113:
1037:
1033:grant proposal
1016:
987:
984:
983:
982:
943:
940:
904:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
878:
840:assessments?
822:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
764:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
693:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
672:this hackathon
655:Blue Rasberry
623:
620:
619:
618:
606:Blue Rasberry
584:
563:
562:
561:
560:
556:
508:
486:
483:
482:
481:
469:Blue Rasberry
424:
421:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
377:Blue Rasberry
370:
345:
307:Blue Rasberry
281:
278:
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
226:Blue Rasberry
165:
162:
147:
144:
120:
117:
89:
86:
83:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4610:
4601:
4600:
4596:
4592:
4588:
4584:
4580:
4576:
4568:
4566:
4565:
4560:
4556:
4550:
4549:
4544:
4540:
4529:
4525:
4523:
4522:
4518:
4514:
4513:Beyond My Ken
4510:
4508:
4500:
4498:
4497:
4493:
4492:
4485:
4481:
4469:
4465:
4463:
4462:
4458:
4456:
4448:
4446:
4445:
4441:
4437:
4433:
4425:
4423:
4422:
4418:
4414:
4410:
4406:
4402:
4398:
4390:
4387:
4385:
4384:
4380:
4376:
4372:
4368:
4364:
4360:
4352:
4350:
4349:
4345:
4341:
4337:
4333:
4329:
4325:
4317:
4315:
4314:
4310:
4306:
4302:
4298:
4294:
4290:
4282:
4280:
4279:
4274:
4270:
4266:
4258:
4254:
4247:
4236:
4234:
4233:
4230:
4229:š¶ EpicPupper
4226:
4218:
4212:
4208:
4206:
4205:
4201:
4197:
4193:
4189:
4185:
4181:
4173:
4171:
4170:
4166:
4162:
4161:Bumbubookworm
4158:
4154:
4150:
4146:
4139:
4135:
4133:
4132:
4128:
4124:
4120:
4116:
4112:
4108:
4100:
4098:
4097:
4093:
4089:
4088:Tyrone Madera
4081:
4079:
4078:
4074:
4070:
4062:
4060:
4059:
4055:
4051:
4047:
4043:
4039:
4035:
4027:
4025:
4024:
4021:
4012:
4004:
3998:
3994:
3992:
3991:
3987:
3983:
3979:
3975:
3971:
3967:
3959:
3955:
3951:
3947:
3940:
3937:
3934:
3930:
3926:
3923:
3920:
3916:
3912:
3909:
3906:
3902:
3896:
3891:
3890:
3889:
3888:
3885:
3881:
3873:
3871:
3870:
3866:
3862:
3858:
3854:
3850:
3846:
3838:
3836:
3835:
3831:
3827:
3826:Beyond My Ken
3823:
3815:
3813:
3812:
3809:
3807:
3806:
3799:
3791:
3787:
3784:
3779:
3770:
3761:
3760:
3759:
3758:
3754:
3750:
3746:
3742:
3739:
3729:
3726:parameter to
3717:
3713:
3709:
3702:
3701:
3695:
3693:
3692:
3688:
3684:
3683:Beyond My Ken
3680:
3672:
3670:
3669:
3660:
3654:
3648:
3644:
3639:
3633:
3627:
3621:
3615:
3611:
3606:
3600:
3594:
3590:
3586:
3580:
3579:modern update
3573:
3567:
3561:
3555:
3549:
3545:
3540:
3534:
3528:
3522:
3517:
3509:
3505:
3501:
3497:
3490:
3484:
3483:
3479:
3475:
3472:. Thank you.
3471:
3470:
3465:
3464:
3450:
3446:
3443:
3441:
3440:
3437:
3431:
3427:
3423:
3419:
3411:
3408:
3402:
3398:
3394:
3387:
3377:
3370:
3365:
3357:
3356:unprintworthy
3347:
3337:
3330:
3329:
3328:
3324:
3320:
3316:
3312:
3306:
3301:
3297:
3293:
3292:Paris, France
3285:
3279:. I see that
3278:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3266:
3262:
3258:
3253:
3249:
3238:
3228:
3226:
3225:
3221:
3217:
3216:Beyond My Ken
3213:
3206:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3188:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3169:
3168:
3167:
3166:
3162:
3159:
3156:
3152:
3146:
3136:
3134:
3133:
3130:
3125:
3123:
3115:
3112:
3111:
3107:
3105:
3104:
3100:
3096:
3092:
3086:
3084:
3080:
3072:
3070:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3045:
3043:
3042:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3023:
3016:
3008:
3006:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2986:
2985:Template:V0.5
2983:
2981:
2980:
2976:
2972:
2971:Beyond My Ken
2968:
2961:
2947:
2943:
2939:
2933:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2922:
2918:
2912:
2907:
2906:
2905:
2901:
2897:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2872:
2868:
2864:
2858:
2854:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2844:
2838:
2832:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2802:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2768:
2765:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2745:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2732:
2729:
2725:
2721:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2713:
2705:
2703:
2702:
2698:
2694:
2690:
2682:
2680:
2679:
2675:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2639:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2615:
2611:
2606:
2602:
2596:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2589:
2584:
2580:
2574:
2566:
2564:
2563:
2558:
2554:
2544:
2538:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2503:
2497:
2492:
2486:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2399:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2371:
2367:
2359:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2337:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2327:
2321:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2301:
2297:
2291:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2280:
2276:
2268:
2266:
2265:
2260:
2257:
2254:
2253:
2246:
2242:
2241:
2236:
2232:
2231:
2216:
2213:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2195:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2183:
2180:
2177:
2169:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2084:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2052:
2051:Cyberpower678
2048:
2047:contributions
2042:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2014:
2012:
2011:
2007:
2003:
1995:
1993:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1979:
1970:
1967:
1964:
1960:
1957:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1946:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1935:
1930:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1919:
1916:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1909:
1901:
1899:
1895:
1893:
1885:Why an index?
1884:
1882:
1876:
1874:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1860:this proposal
1853:
1849:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1805:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1776:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1730:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1708:Template:V0.5
1705:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1672:
1665:
1655:
1648:
1642:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1622:
1615:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1546:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1499:
1493:
1485:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1408:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1386:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1347:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1298:
1292:
1285:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1226:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1211:
1207:
1202:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1158:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1142:
1136:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1110:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1084:
1080:
1074:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1014:
1011:
1008:
1006:
996:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
957:
953:
949:
941:
939:
938:
933:
931:Join WP Japan
927:
923:
916:
910:
902:
898:
892:
888:
884:
879:
876:
875:
873:
872:
871:
870:
866:
862:
855:
846:
843:
835:
831:
827:
820:
814:
810:
806:
799:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
762:
754:
750:
746:
742:
741:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
708:
704:
699:
691:
685:
681:
677:
673:
668:
667:
666:
663:
658:
656:
650:
647:
646:
645:
644:
640:
636:
631:
627:
621:
617:
614:
609:
607:
601:
595:
590:
589:
588:
587:
582:
578:
570:
568:
559:
554:
550:
542:
540:
536:
532:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
506:
502:
494:
492:
484:
480:
477:
472:
470:
464:
460:
456:
455:
454:
453:
449:
445:
438:
432:
419:
409:
405:
401:
395:
390:
389:
388:
385:
380:
378:
371:
368:
364:
363:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:here's a link
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
326:
320:
319:
318:
315:
310:
308:
302:
299:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
279:
277:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
258:
254:
245:
237:
234:
229:
227:
221:
217:
216:
215:
212:
211:
208:
207:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
177:
176:
171:
163:
161:
160:
157:
153:
145:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
118:
116:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
87:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4572:
4547:
4532:
4511:
4504:
4489:
4472:
4452:
4436:WhatamIdoing
4429:
4394:
4356:
4321:
4286:
4240:
4222:
4177:
4142:
4104:
4085:
4082:Next Release
4066:
4031:
4008:
3963:
3935:
3921:
3907:
3877:
3842:
3819:
3804:
3803:
3795:
3768:
3745:WP:SEAOFBLUE
3735:
3727:
3712:edit request
3676:
3667:
3666:
3658:
3652:
3642:
3637:
3631:
3625:
3619:
3609:
3604:
3599:participants
3598:
3584:
3578:
3571:
3565:
3559:
3553:
3543:
3538:
3533:participants
3532:
3526:
3520:
3467:
3461:
3460:
3415:
3364:Taylor, Dean
3247:
3232:
3210:
3157:
3140:
3121:
3118:
3087:
3076:
3050:I've raised
3049:
3012:
2989:
2965:
2806:
2738:
2727:
2723:
2711:
2709:
2686:
2655:
2619:
2595:View history
2594:
2572:
2570:
2533:
2363:
2272:
2251:
2238:
2228:
2227:
2173:
2057:
2018:
1999:
1980:
1976:
1939:
1923:
1905:
1896:
1888:
1880:
1857:
1845:Black Falcon
1822:
1801:Black Falcon
1796:
1792:
1784:
1751:Black Falcon
1699:Black Falcon
1671:Black Falcon
1614:Black Falcon
1603:Black Falcon
1584:
1541:
1514:
1509:
1455:
1447:
1412:
1313:
1264:
1216:
1175:
1161:
1114:
1083:WP:OWNership
1078:
1040:
1004:
989:
946:
945:
906:
883:WhatamIdoing
861:WhatamIdoing
847:
824:
769:āĀ Preceding
766:
695:
654:
632:
628:
625:
605:
564:
534:
488:
468:
435:
394:Bluerasberry
376:
325:Bluerasberry
306:
283:
264:
249:
225:
210:
205:
173:
167:
149:
122:
91:
78:
43:
37:
4551:. āĀ Martin
4430:Please see
4069:41.114.8.64
3805:PaperĀ Luigi
3777:|Ā melecieĀ |
3612:: maintain
3546:: maintain
3393:Narky Blert
3369:Dean Taylor
3346:printworthy
3341:, which is
3191:Jason Quinn
2857:LibraryGeek
2813:LibraryGeek
2807:Scripts on
2787:LibraryGeek
2728:enwp10 tool
2252:SMcCandlish
2015:Bot broken?
1908:version 0.7
1595:Version 0.7
1587:Version 0.5
1291:these edits
1217:SMcCandlish
1183:! Thanks,
1154:version 0.8
1135:SMcCandlish
1005:SMcCandlish
842:EpochFail's
253:TeeTylerToe
206:OhanaUnited
125:User:Kelson
36:This is an
4016:Shibboleth
3901:WPĀ 1.0Ā bot
3749:96.8.24.95
3720:|answered=
3673:Discussion
3521:continuity
3435:GamerPro64
3149:? cheers,
3079:WP 1.0 Bot
3046:ANI thread
2830:RadioKAOS
2739:Make table
2712:WP 1.0 bot
2506:Etzedek24
2370:Etzedek24
2194:Qwerty6811
1944:As used on
1736:|v0.5=pass
995:Historical
986:Historical
373:proposal.
156:Randy Kryn
79:ArchiveĀ 20
73:ArchiveĀ 19
68:ArchiveĀ 18
60:ArchiveĀ 15
4541:has been
4413:George Ho
4397:Albatross
4389:Albatross
4264:Nihiltres
3966:Malcolm X
3929:Audiodude
3668:Comments:
3151:Cas Liber
2853:RadioKAOS
2772:Adamdaley
2748:Adamdaley
2638:GermanJoe
2623:Wikiditor
2502:WP:COMICS
2366:WP:COMICS
2342:GermanJoe
2336:Etzedek24
2326:Etzedek24
2320:GermanJoe
2305:GermanJoe
2290:Etzedek24
2279:Etzedek24
2275:WP:COMICS
2083:Redrose64
1947:Popcrate:
1826:Jonesey95
1492:Redrose64
1448:identical
1385:Redrose64
1346:Redrose64
1168:our grant
1145:like this
1127:Redrose64
594:Rfassbind
489:The page
4136:FAR for
3939:contribs
3925:contribs
3911:contribs
3626:Bourbons
3605:war aims
3539:war aims
3244:Justin (
3173:Walkerma
3161:contribs
3145:Walkerma
3095:Walkerma
3083:web tool
3060:Mathglot
2932:Walkerma
2917:Walkerma
2882:Walkerma
2867:Walkerma
2756:JoeHebda
2693:Walkerma
2601:JoeHebda
2579:JoeHebda
2553:JoeHebda
2515:Walkerma
2473:WP:YORKS
2398:WP:YORKS
2200:Walkerma
2190:Thanks,
2170:Reviewer
2132:Walkerma
2103:Walkerma
2061:contribs
2041:Morriswa
2002:Walkerma
1983:Walkerma
1963:Features
1864:Walkerma
1775:Walkerma
1760:Walkerma
1712:Walkerma
1681:Walkerma
1641:Walkerma
1626:Walkerma
1567:Walkerma
1545:Walkerma
1519:Walkerma
1429:FA-class
1421:GA-class
1324:|class=B
1315:criteria
1297:this one
1245:Walkerma
1185:Walkerma
1104:Walkerma
1073:Walkerma
1058:Walkerma
826:Walkerma
805:Walkerma
783:contribs
771:unsigned
745:Walkerma
676:Walkerma
576:fassbind
548:fassbind
517:Walkerma
500:fassbind
400:Icebob99
353:Icebob99
335:Icebob99
301:Icebob99
287:Icebob99
267:Walkerma
251:article?
190:Walkerma
133:Walkerma
106:Walkerma
4491:CX Zoom
4484:per RfC
4426:Ratings
3743:form a
3643:results
3560:results
3447:has an
2938:Keith D
2911:Keith D
2896:Keith D
2741:button.
2477:Keith D
2441:Keith D
2405:Keith D
2243:on the
2182:Ping me
1425:A-class
1417:B-class
1206:WP:CORE
1079:on-wiki
972:Jameboy
952:Jameboy
903:article
838:|class=
731:Keith D
649:Amire80
537:in the
461:became
98:Cobblet
39:archive
4577:for a
4399:for a
4361:for a
4340:FinnV3
4326:for a
4291:for a
4289:Slayer
4182:for a
4147:for a
4109:for a
4036:for a
3968:for a
3946:rose64
3927:) and
3915:Kelson
3847:for a
3638:Mysore
3420:for a
3128:(talk)
3056:WP:ANI
2710:While
2666:Ahecht
2537:Kelson
2496:Kelson
2459:Kelson
2419:Kelson
2384:Kelson
2068:rose64
1601:)? --
1593:) and
1515:should
1469:rose64
1370:rose64
1331:rose64
1090:rose64
798:PiGuy3
775:PiGuy3
719:Orygun
703:Orygun
661:(talk)
612:(talk)
581:ā talk
553:ā talk
505:ā talk
475:(talk)
444:rose64
383:(talk)
313:(talk)
232:(talk)
175:DexDor
4591:Z1720
4375:Z1720
4305:Z1720
4273:edits
4246:class
4196:Z1720
4123:Z1720
4050:Z1720
3982:Z1720
3941:)? --
3895:Evrik
3884:evrik
3861:Z1720
3724:|ans=
3710:This
3632:Dutch
3585:scope
3527:scope
3022:WP1.0
1729:WP1.0
1664:WP1.0
1506:Kiwix
1310:Vital
1241:WP:VA
1171:work.
1109:Wizzy
1046:Kiwix
1036:here.
901:Japan
16:<
4595:talk
4587:here
4559:talk
4555:MSGJ
4517:talk
4507:here
4440:talk
4417:talk
4409:here
4379:talk
4371:here
4344:talk
4336:here
4309:talk
4301:here
4269:talk
4200:talk
4192:here
4165:talk
4157:here
4127:talk
4119:here
4092:talk
4073:talk
4054:talk
4046:here
3986:talk
3978:here
3950:talk
3948:š¹ (
3933:talk
3919:talk
3905:talk
3865:talk
3857:here
3830:talk
3769:Done
3753:talk
3687:talk
3610:Brit
3544:Brit
3500:talk
3478:talk
3430:here
3397:talk
3381:and
3323:talk
3220:talk
3195:talk
3177:talk
3155:talk
3099:talk
3064:talk
3037:talk
3033:PC78
3000:talk
2996:PC78
2975:talk
2967:this
2942:talk
2921:talk
2900:talk
2886:talk
2871:talk
2855:and
2817:talk
2791:talk
2776:talk
2760:talk
2752:talk
2697:talk
2673:PAGE
2671:TALK
2660:and
2642:talk
2627:talk
2605:talk
2583:talk
2557:talk
2545:the
2541:For
2519:talk
2481:talk
2463:talk
2455:here
2445:talk
2423:talk
2409:talk
2388:talk
2346:talk
2309:talk
2204:talk
2179:Chat
2150:talk
2136:talk
2121:talk
2107:talk
2093:talk
2072:talk
2070:š¹ (
2055:talk
2029:talk
2006:talk
1987:talk
1906:For
1868:talk
1830:talk
1764:talk
1716:talk
1695:here
1685:talk
1659:and
1654:V0.5
1630:talk
1621:here
1571:talk
1555:talk
1523:talk
1473:talk
1471:š¹ (
1444:here
1413:must
1396:talk
1374:talk
1372:š¹ (
1357:talk
1335:talk
1333:š¹ (
1306:v0.7
1272:talk
1249:talk
1189:talk
1160:see
1094:talk
1092:š¹ (
1062:talk
976:talk
956:talk
909:here
887:talk
865:talk
854:ping
836:for
830:Lane
809:talk
779:talk
749:talk
735:talk
707:talk
680:talk
639:talk
626:Hi,
622:Logo
521:talk
448:talk
446:š¹ (
404:talk
357:talk
339:talk
291:talk
271:talk
257:talk
218:See
194:talk
137:talk
110:talk
102:talk
4019:ink
3944:Red
3722:or
3714:to
3636:--
3630:--
3624:--
3618:--
3608:--
3552:--
3542:--
3449:RFC
3412:FAR
3302:on
3054:at
2603:ā¢ (
2581:ā¢ (
2555:ā¢ (
2401:log
2261:š¼
2066:Red
1745:or
1510:all
1467:Red
1460::".
1368:Red
1329:Red
1231:ā±·ā¼
1227:ā½ā±·Ņ
1088:Red
1019:ā±·ā¼
1015:ā½ā±·Ņ
914:ę„ę¬ē©£
442:Red
431:FYI
321:Hi
4597:)
4589:.
4557:Ā·
4519:)
4509:.
4459::
4442:)
4434:.
4419:)
4411:.
4381:)
4373:.
4346:)
4338:.
4311:)
4303:.
4275:}}
4261:{{
4249:}}
4243:{{
4202:)
4194:.
4167:)
4159:.
4129:)
4121:.
4094:)
4075:)
4056:)
4048:.
3988:)
3980:.
3952:)
3867:)
3859:.
3832:)
3824:.
3755:)
3728:no
3689:)
3681:.
3657:-
3651:-
3645:-
3620:US
3603:-
3597:-
3583:-
3577:-
3570:-
3564:-
3558:-
3554:US
3537:-
3531:-
3525:-
3519:-
3502:)
3480:)
3432:.
3399:)
3391:.
3389:}}
3383:{{
3379:}}
3373:{{
3359:}}
3353:{{
3349:}}
3343:{{
3339:}}
3333:{{
3325:)
3287:}}
3281:{{
3250:vf
3246:ko
3240:}}
3234:{{
3222:)
3197:)
3179:)
3163:)
3101:)
3066:)
3039:)
3031:.
3025:}}
3019:{{
3002:)
2994:.
2977:)
2944:)
2923:)
2902:)
2888:)
2873:)
2865:.
2819:)
2793:)
2778:)
2762:)
2724:Go
2699:)
2691:.
2676:)
2644:)
2629:)
2599:ā
2577:ā
2551:ā
2521:)
2483:)
2465:)
2447:)
2425:)
2411:)
2390:)
2348:)
2311:)
2249:ā
2206:)
2152:)
2138:)
2123:)
2109:)
2095:)
2074:)
2031:)
2008:)
1989:)
1894:.
1870:)
1832:)
1766:)
1732:}}
1726:{{
1718:)
1687:)
1667:}}
1661:{{
1657:}}
1651:{{
1632:)
1573:)
1557:)
1525:)
1475:)
1464:--
1427:;
1423:;
1419:;
1398:)
1376:)
1359:)
1337:)
1308:/
1304:/
1274:)
1251:)
1214:ā
1191:)
1176:do
1096:)
1064:)
1052:,
1048:,
1002:ā
998:}}
992:{{
978:)
958:)
928:Ā·
924:Ā·
921:ęēØæ
917:Ā·
889:)
867:)
857:}}
851:{{
811:)
785:)
781:ā¢
751:)
737:)
729:.
709:)
682:)
641:)
523:)
450:)
439:--
406:)
359:)
341:)
293:)
273:)
259:)
196:)
154:.
139:)
131:.
112:)
64:ā
4593:(
4561:)
4553:(
4515:(
4488:ā
4438:(
4415:(
4377:(
4342:(
4307:(
4271:|
4267:|
4198:(
4163:(
4125:(
4090:(
4071:(
4052:(
3984:(
3936:Ā·
3931:(
3922:Ā·
3917:(
3908:Ā·
3903:(
3897::
3893:@
3863:(
3828:(
3782:t
3773:ā
3751:(
3685:(
3498:(
3491:?
3476:(
3395:(
3321:(
3267:āÆ
3265:M
3263:āŗ
3261:C
3259:ā®
3257:T
3255:ā¤
3252:)
3248:a
3218:(
3193:(
3175:(
3158:Ā·
3153:(
3147::
3143:@
3097:(
3062:(
3035:(
2998:(
2973:(
2940:(
2934::
2930:@
2919:(
2913::
2909:@
2898:(
2884:(
2869:(
2859::
2851:@
2839:/
2833:/
2815:(
2789:(
2774:(
2758:(
2750:(
2695:(
2668:(
2640:(
2625:(
2607:)
2585:)
2559:)
2539::
2535:@
2517:(
2498::
2494:@
2479:(
2461:(
2443:(
2421:(
2407:(
2386:(
2344:(
2338::
2334:@
2322::
2318:@
2307:(
2292::
2288:@
2259:Ā¢
2256:ā
2202:(
2196::
2192:@
2148:(
2134:(
2119:(
2105:(
2091:(
2085::
2081:@
2058:Ā·
2053:(
2043::
2039:@
2027:(
2004:(
1985:(
1958:.
1866:(
1828:(
1777::
1773:@
1762:(
1714:(
1683:(
1643::
1639:@
1628:(
1616::
1612:@
1597:(
1589:(
1569:(
1553:(
1547::
1543:@
1521:(
1494::
1490:@
1488:,
1486::
1482:@
1409::
1405:@
1394:(
1387::
1383:@
1355:(
1348::
1344:@
1286::
1282:@
1270:(
1247:(
1229:į“„
1225:Ā¢
1222:ā
1219:āŗ
1187:(
1137::
1133:@
1131:,
1129::
1125:@
1115:ā
1111:ā¦
1075::
1071:@
1060:(
1017:į“„
1013:Ā¢
1010:ā
1007:āŗ
974:(
954:(
934:!
885:(
863:(
807:(
800::
796:@
777:(
747:(
733:(
705:(
678:(
637:(
596::
592:@
574:R
546:R
519:(
498:R
402:(
396::
392:@
355:(
337:(
327::
323:@
289:(
269:(
255:(
192:(
135:(
108:(
100:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.