37:
So, although the term is of recent coinage, I suspect that it will grow in usage as the (Perl, Python, Ruby, ...) community continues to use it. My question is, how long do
Knowledge (XXG) and/or Wiktionary have to wait before having another vote? It has been a bit over a year since the last vote and
33:
This term (and more commonly, the variant "agile language") seem to be entering the language. It is particularly popular in the language communities involved, in part because the alternative ("scripting languages") is seen as misunderstood, if not pejorative. That is, scripters are tired of having
50:
I would say that 16 months is more than long enough. I'd also suggest, though, given this history of article deletion, that you will want to cite solidly for any claim you make about this term. --
17:
58:
44:
23:
55:
41:
51:
24:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Votes for deletion/Agile programming language
34:to explain that scripting languages are "real".
8:
38:the term doesn't appear to be going away.
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for deletion
7:
31:
1:
59:00:02, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
45:05:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
75:
22:(Redirected from
66:
27:
74:
73:
69:
68:
67:
65:
64:
63:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
72:
70:
62:
61:
30:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
71:
60:
57:
53:
49:
48:
47:
46:
43:
39:
35:
25:
19:
40:
36:
32:
42:RichMorin
52:Jmabel
16:<
56:Talk
54:|
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.