Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2004/Sep-Dec

2739:

copy of A&S, but also implies that he spends enough time actually reading it that he can not only recognize that the topic is covered there, but also that he can recolect that it is referred to in "several mentions and footnotes", without even having to check. But someone who owns and browses A&S with that degree of seriousness has far more than enough mathematical maturity to immediately recognize that the CNOM article was nonsense, and that even if it weren't nonsense, it is not the sort of thing that is covered in A&S. What we have here is someone who has heard of A&S but who is not sufficiently familiar with its contents to realize that his claim was an obvious lie. --

1300:. The word "algebra" here is not being used as a technical term, as say in "Boolean algebra" or "linear algebra" but rather as a descriptive term, for this collection of facts concerning "the basic properties and laws of sets, the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection, and complementation and the relations of set equality and set inclusion." The motivation for using the word "algebra" beyond it's descriptiveness, is to help the reader make the connection to the perhaps more familiar notion of algebra of numbers. It is a relatively common way of describing this material. For example Robert R. Stoll in 1308:(Schaum's Outline Series). Having said that I'm not opposed to finding a better name for the article. I had also considered simply "Set algebra" as an alternative name. What name are you proposing? As you say, and as is pointed out in the article, the power set of a given set is a Boolean algebra. As to your other suggestion of "this kind of placing would be helpful" I'm not sure what this means, could you please be more specific? Thank you again. 47: 1943:

by Japaridze and published in 2003 and 2004; I've found no other references). User:Kntg has inserted a lot of references to Japaridze's work: they may be the same person or related (academically). I think there is no harm in having the computability logic article, though the status of the theory should probably be explained better. In my opinion, some links to the computability logic article are over the top (for instance, those at

3176:

number? Where did you get the magazine (separate editions are published in different countries). Is this design methology described in other professional or scholarly journals? In which department and context did the Wisconsin project take place? What is the current occupation of David Baka, and what was his position in Wisconsin? Thanks again, and sorry about giving you such a hard time. --

1751:. (More precisely, every time that I've ever noticed an upright "d" in published material, it turned out that the material was published in a foreign country.) Speaking more broadly, I'm against instituting unnecessary conventions on Knowledge, and caution you (to avoid upsetting some people) against editing articles to fit your conventions. But by all means make your 3066:(follow the link, then click on "Wheels for the Mind" in the sidebar) suggests that the first issue of this magazine was in Nov 1998. However, I would recommend waiting a few days and making absolutely sure that the article is bogus before listing it. Note that we also had to argue a bit before the article on Cayley-Newbirth matrix was accepted as a hoax. 1870:

should just expand coverage of 'core areas', with the long-term goals of getting to the frontier of research. Sometimes I add surveys of topics, to move things ahead; or add isolated (at present) theorems or conjectures. What really does need to happen is that the coverage as a whole stays balanced, even if it's a bit humiliating that the

1506:

fourier transforms, etc. should we just use whatever variables are conventional in each specific topic? and what about a topic like fourier transforms which are used in contexts with i for current but also used in unrelated contexts where the majority of people would be used to i for imaginary number? -

2232:

are named after? I tried various google searches and the only thing I can find is that there's some guy Boris Zech who published something in 2004 (although since the title is in German, I don't know what it's about), but MacTutor doesn't seem to have any info on anyone named Zech. Mainly, I'm just

1942:

Since nobody responded, I looked into the matter though I do not know that much of either theoretical computer science or Knowledge policies. As the article on computability logic explains, it is a new theory proposed by Japaridze in 2003 (MathSciNet lists only two papers on computability logic, both

2894:

In general, Bryleigh's Theorem states that if we have a solution to a differential equation, and this solution satisfies the differential equation, then the solution is a "valid and true" solution, no matter how we may have obtained this solution. Among other important guarantees, Bryleigh's Theorem

2793:

Yeah, I wonder if in your investigative work, Detective Matthews, you came to realize that IP address is one of a block of IP addresses owned by Verizon. The Virginia legislature gave benefits an tax write-offs to computer companies, and most large internet providers have located their headquarters

1505:

Probably doesn't matter, but is there any standard for variable letters? For instance, most people use i for the imaginary number and f(t) for a function vs time, but I am used to engineering convention, which uses j for the imaginary number (because i is current), and x(t), since f is frequency in

1336:

Gadykozma, thanks for your comments. As far as the analogy holds, union is the analog of addition (in fact the union of two sets has been sometimes called their "sum") and Intersection is the analog of multiplication. The article used the order of their mention to try to make this clear (perhaps a

3454:

My opinion, FWIW, it that a fairuse tag would be appriariate, since its wording mentions the public domain; and I would take the trouble to point back at (and copy the text of) the St. Andrews webpage in the Image page. In the event that an issue is ever raised, at least we will have an audit trail

3428:

I can't provide a reference page on this, although maybe someone else can, but I recall a user contacting them about using materials from their website and they said no. That being said, I'm not sure if that applies to materials that even they may not have permission for, or if they were referring

3399:

I am taking this to vfd. None of the math-savvy editors here have heard of it. Possibly some computational experts over in vfd will recognize it, but I doubt it. No verifiable info given. No references given. No google evidence found. Article is not intelligible. Sole anon defender is likely

2738:

lying. Here's why I think so: Anyone with even a moderate amount of mathematic sophistication would have immediately recognized that article as being pseudomathematical nonsense, and a number of the other participants in the VfD discussion did point this out. ExplorerCDT not only claims to own a

2542:

Certainly no apology at all. Standing against this user are a number of things. User page has a number of loudmouth points, in particular against civility and 'hatred' of conventions on lower-case (a possible gripe?). In effect it admits user has tested the system with pages to see how quickly they

2022:

Primary research such as proposing theories and solutions, original ideas, defining terms, coining words, etc. If you have done primary research on a topic, publish your results in normal peer-reviewed journals. Knowledge will report about your work once it becomes part of accepted human knowledge.

1738:

I was extraordinary happy when I saw that subscripts that are not variables should be upright Far from everyone has understood that. Another thing people, even here at Knowledge, don't put uphright is the differential operator, and I dislike it from the bottom of my heart! ;-) Wouldn't it be a good

3481:

Considering that they seem conscious of image copyright issues, I'd wager that these images are quite likely to all be public domain. We have enough images falsely marked public domain that if we did use them in print, some careful filtering would be necessary in any case. Independent verification

2628:

Hard to explain your behaviour at VfD, then. You don't have a particular interest in mathematics here. You don't have that much background in it. You decide to make circumstantial claims that the page is genuine, citing a classic text which just happens to be one of the longer works you could have

1627:

It depends on your preferences, browser rendering of HTML, etc. I have tentatively converted to the "everything in math tags no regular text in italics" camp, and even switched my preferences to "render everything in PNG". It takes a couple articles to get used to but then I liked it. Most math

3175:

I verified that the magazine was indeed around in 1986. However, I'm still looking for more verifiable information, like answers to any of these questions. Do you know the title and/or author of the article in "Wheels for the Mind" in which the Wisconsin project was described, or perhaps the page

2357:

Looking at the two articles, I'm not sure that they are redundant, even though they do cover some of the same information. If a merger is necessary, I don't know where to begin. However, I think that an article on the SKI system could exist independently from the article on combinatory logic in

1665:

Actually, I think they were showing that the HTML rendering of TeX (not the PNGs) and the plain old HTML letters look different. The TeX rendered into HTML is in a serif font and kind of weird sizes, so it doesn't match with the rest of the text. I guess some people like it like that. You can

1869:

Well, it's kind of optimistic. It would be great to have the mathematics of the 1990s, and the twenty-noughties even, properly covered here. In many cases that would involve just writing articles with 'long words' in them: red links to concepts that we don't have. So, sometimes it looks like we

2586:

I don't need to answer to you, with your Torquemada-esque Inquisition, sneakily worded insinuations, and boldfaced accusations (without merit). I've given you the answers your required. No matter what I say, you will still think I'm responsible for the CNOM hoax. I didn't even know Knowledge

2388:, clearly mathematically literate, has been adding plausible nonsense to general topology and functional analysis page. Please will all look out for 'tweaks' of mathematical articles that are jargon-filled rubbish. There was a whole hoax page. This is an exploratory vandal attack, testing us. 3322:

is, if it is anything at all, it is not "a branch of mathematics involving the modeling of changes in state. It is related to computation and discrete mathematics". The way it is described in the article, it is at best a graphical database query access language for commercial use. Also the

1996:

While I'm sure that whoever did these edits has some investment, careerwise and/or emotional, in the topic, there are reasons to doubt it is Japaridze, namely whoever it is hasn't done a terribly good job of summarising the topic; I would normally expect a researcher to do a better job than

2554:

page, a recurring interest (which is one reason why thinking a 'conspiracy' to hoax is not really far-fetched, at least to me). Abuse in edit summaries, edit wars, tasteless edits, generally obnoxious behaviour. There is no real reason to doubt this is the same user (cf. continuity of the

2727:, although he claims currently that his copy of A&S is packed away due to a move. If that page reference is provided and checks out then I think that would be a satisfactory explanation of events and no further action or investigation would be necessary. Benefit of the doubt, etc. 1284:

of sets'. Which might be useful to some people, indeed. Since the 'set of all sets' is chimerical, your 'algebra' is not precisely a Boolean algebra; the subsets of a given set X would give a Boolean algebra. I think this kind of placing would be helpful; and probably renaming the page.

3446:

Thanks for your reply. I would presume this is about the biographies proper though, and not the images they themselves describe as public domain to the best of their knowledge. Have you followed through the above link on copyright and read what they say themselves about their images?

1963:) are respectable. The links are not worth the prominence they are sometimes given; but I haven't done much about it except to tone down the coverage a little. At the moment it falls into the category of being a little bit annoying. We do have at least one active logician ( 3109:): This should be rather easy to resolve, since you are apparently familiar with Qualculus. Could you please give some verifiable information, like precise references to the white papers or the participants of the Wisconsin project and any reports they wrote? Thank you. 1681:

the bottom justification of the HTML text? It does for me. It's just the size of them, it's that they protrude below the line of text, so that e.g. the "p" in L^p is no longer a superscript, it reads horizontally on the same level as an HTML "p" (or very close).

3366:

Yep, basically agree. Although I was more inclined to regard it as an idiosyncratic concept, the URL path is certainly strange...movies? www.angelfire.com/movies/heme/Math/Qualculus.htm. There is no reason to be sure it is even Baka's "white paper" at all.

3211:

SQL is a common database language so any subject about databases would probably fit SQL. The purpose of the example is to use something that is familar and build on it. I have used this method to design databases. I have also used it to design Java

2760:

Sorry, but there's no sense refuting the deluded close-minded rantings of someone (Dominus) who should have been institutionalized long ago. Only the insane engage in exercises of futility, and I'm not close to being driven insane (yet). Just rage.

1337:

well placed "respectively" is needed.) As I partially said above, the use of this analogy is to help motivate these ideas for the reader, and to help place these facts concerning set theory in an appropriate setting. Including the fact that

1646:

That's what I have now!! I've had it for weeks or months that way and still hate it. Perhaps it's my HTML text size relative to PNG. The PNG's are just TWICE as tall and FOUR times as big as HTML. This is what he meant above by "horrid".

2004:

The edits are gung-ho and lack perspective but they were not abusive and they have stopped. Take care when reintroducing appropriate perspective not to throw away perfectly good content: that cure would be worse than the disease. ----

2186:, but neither seem to be a good fit. If someone who understands these trace articles better can confirm that neither is what I'm speaking of, let me know and I can write up an article about the trace and its properties. Thanks. 3493:

article, and they also think the image is in the public domain since they believe they've seen it in the Soviet media back in the 50s. Independently, I am working to get a solid specific permission to use a much better image from

3303:

seems to be somebody's (bad) attempt to model a query access and processing language. Whatever it is, that white paper is very badly written. David Baka appears to be a real person, however. According to his summary at Amazon

1700:

They look centered in the middle of the line to me. I used Firefox. Bigger than the rest of the text, but I am used to it, and it looks better than the TeX rendered as HTML. You see it like that on webpages all the time. -

1323:

analogies with usual algebra. A) You never say explicitly which operation is the analog of addition and which of multiplication (does this make sense? If not, the article should explain that too). B) Analogs of (a <= b) =:

1325:(a+c <= b+c) should be highlighted. C) perhaps to put to the right of every inequality the anaolg (if it exists) in usual algebra? Arrange everything in comparison tables? I feel I'm starting to float. Think about these. 2396:

Since the user page claims that none of his edits are good faith, I suggest that we don't seek any good addition he has made amidst the rubbish, but rather have an admin block the account and do a blanket automatic revert.

2176: 1746:

In my experience, the "d" is upright in England but italicised in the United States. Being a United Stateser myself (my own personal conventions notwithstanding), I've seen quite a few examples of italics in the US and

2629:

mentioned. Given your remarkably arrogant approach generally, and your specific evasiveness about the 'clues' ... Ah yes - reminds me to ask, what were the 'clues'? The thing does fit together like a crossword; while

2595:

It is being mooted that the ArbCom should be brought into this. Now, that really would be inquisitorial, and an adversarial process where just about anything you ever wrote here could be brought up. Think about it.

2964:

It has been mostly used by computer consultants. There have been some white papers on this but not widely distributed. Since it was originally developed by University of Wisconsin students, it is regarded as public

2040:

Thanks for your input. I think the business has been handled adequately, so far; the edits have been 'POV', obviously, but the WP response has been 'professional', i.e. proportionate, patient, and not too reactive.

1361:) is probably good in it's own right, that it continues the analogy is also nice. But I think we should be careful about relying too heavily on the analogy. It is not meant (by me at least ;-)) to be an article 2305:

I just created the beginning of this article and would like to invite my fellow mathematicians to contribute and edit. I've just started to learn Wiki LaTeX, but I think I did a pretty good job with things.

2954:

The update to this shows some significant material which demonostrates factual computer knowledge. It also has examples of how it would be used to design a database. This is not out of line with computation.

2000:

I don't follow the detail of Japaridze's work myself, but a close colleague of mine does, and it is the real thing: solid research work that is well-motivated and perhaps has the potential to make a real

2995:

Note, above comment is by 24.145.133.16, one of the two anon ip's to Qualculus. Both ip's resolve to Columbus OH, suggesting the possibility that this anon is actually the orginal author of Qualculus.

1483:

Yes, they are both multiplication. \cdot is more appropriate for advanced texts and \times for beginner level texts. Also \times is used in advanced text to denote "special" kinds of multiplication like

1272:

the latter being primarily just a list. One could argue that consequently the latter article is no longer necessary. But I can see the possible use of an article which simply lists results. Comments?

1979:

article. I will remove them where necessary. I will leave the computability logic article as is, althought I do not think recent research material (2003, 2004) is appropiate for wikipedia inclusion.

70: 3005:

Both articles look bogus to me. A couple of "white papers", do not, a branch of mathematics make. Either a hoax or "original research". Unless better references are provided both should be deleted.

3468:

as PD meanwhile and did like you suggested wrt pointing back and copying the text. Everybody is welcome to re-tag/re-annotate there if I did smth wrong. Thanks a lot to everyone for the guideance!

2435: 2898:

Bryleigh's Theorem is first noted in a 1785 work of English mathematician Jayne Bryleigh (1720-1801). It is an important generalization of Kimber's Third Theorem and Bonnie's Slope Field Lemma.

3331:

A search for "Baka matrix" finds only the Angelfire pages. A search for "Baka matrices" finds nothing. This is either an idiosyncratic concept with no references elsewhere, or a hoax. And this

2865:

page. Other vandal edits (I'm going to ban anyway on the strength of a long track record), including impersonations. Geography: Maryland/North Carolina? I'll do a whois on some of these IPs.

2612:

I think that disinformation added to WP by bad faith editors is a potential problem to which there is no single, simple solution. I think hoaxes are no joke at all. What do you think, sir?

2202:= 2, or GF(p). That's because any trace map is the sum of images of an element when you apply all elements of the Galois group to it; and here the Galois group is cyclic, generated by the 2290:

No. We have had a similar discussion. Lists are in general more useful and flexible than categories. I don't understand the argument, actually. Redundancy is not a criticism on a wiki.

1992:

I only just noticed this discussion. I had seen the disproportionately high profile the topic has taken, and wondered if maybe Japaridze was promoting his own material. A few points:

1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 2503:

is now being purged of what I write there, allegedly unread (fingers-in-ears and adolescent abuse). The current and unsatisfactory position with this user and hoax material is this:

2097: 3312:

Dave Baka has written code for almost every major telephone company in the US. He has been a consultant to several Fortune 500 corporations including IBM and Lucent Technologies.

2032:

which I understand as saying that once ideas have passed the test of peer review, they are fair game for summarisation on Knowledge. So Japaridze's work passes that test. ----

3221:

I have found it much more useful then flow charts or UML because it lends easily to asking questions, where as other methods tend to pigion hole you into a particular design.

1164: 1109: 1050: 995: 940: 885: 830: 775: 720: 665: 610: 555: 500: 445: 390: 335: 280: 225: 170: 115: 25: 1431: 1532:

ok. should you mention this on the wikiproject page? yeah, and x(t) is confusing because of f(x). but then it would be confusing when you transform to X(f), etc. etc. -

1463: 2719:

He has claimed that his initial support of the hoax was based on a misreading of Ablowitz & Stegun, and has almost promised to back this up with a page reference, see

63: 109: 105: 101: 97: 3305: 2712:

At this point in time, I don't trust ExplorerCDT enough for an explanation by him to be sufficient. I feel that a third-party investigation should be undertaken. --

2794:

there (including AOL, fyi). For someone who appears to be somewhat intelligent, you really are clueless. I live in NYC and haven't been to Virginia in 4 years. —

3543: 21: 1771:

for correctness, fullness and especially readability? I tried to write it so that it will be readable (enjoyable?) by any graduate student or equivalent. Thanks

3017:

Looks very bogus. I'll ask a friend who's at Wharton later today, since this isn't my area, but "baka" (the Baka matrix) means stupid in Japanese, I believe.

56: 1719: 2938: 2839: 2562:

The whole pattern is suspect, to me. There are some scholarly edits. If you asked me 'is this a potential malicious and disinformative editor?' I would say

2912: 1931:. He is also the main editor of the computability logic article. My guess is the real name of the user is Giorgi Japaridze and he is hyping his own stuff 1471: 1390: 3164:

The discussion on "Wheels for the Mind" is incorrect, It was started well before 1986. I have hard copies of it. Of course that was before the internet."

2468: 2895:

guarantees the validity of the guess-and-check method of solving differential equations, in which we try to guess elementary antiderivative solutions.

2959:

The past projects this has been used on include IBM's Corepoint SA, Lucent Technologies 7RE PTS switching system, and OCLC RMS intergration project.

2493: 2677:

aggressive to me, but ExplorerCDT certainly seemed like he tacitly admitted he knew about the hoax. His behavior since then has been very odd. --

2587:

existed when it was created. Sure, this is going to be rude and hostile behavior but take it on its face value. Go fuck off you pompous windbag! —

1597:

Some of what you say just isn't true: "If you enter a very simple formula...this will not be displayed using pgn but html, like this:", but this

2102: 1858:

in a dusty corner. I think the goals and information needs to be merged with this WikiProject. Please take a look and salvage what you can. --

3465: 1297: 1269: 17: 1477: 1468: 1396: 1387: 3282: 2949:

This has actually been used to design computer systems but is not well known. Some companies where it has been used are Lucent, IBM and OCLC.

2929:"Qualculus is a branch of mathematics involving the modeling of changes in state...." Google turns up only 5 hits, none to academic sites. 1280:

Hmmm - a few questions relative to the integration with the rest of WP. What you mean mostly is 'here is some explicit information about the

1213: 1209: 1205: 1466: 1385: 3354: 3254: 3091: 3047: 2985: 2426:

I checked it on google (and also "Bayleigh equivalence") and only references I found were copied from wikipedia. I think it's a hoax.

1934:. I am unable to decide whether his ideas should be included in wikipedia or not, they seem to be relatively new. What do you think ? 2746:

In my opinion, Dominus, you're a jackass who hasn't seen straight for years...that's the problem with your head so far up your ass. —

3429:

to text only. I believe that the user that contacted them did post their reply on their user page or a subpage of their user page.

1601:

display as a PGN for me. If you ask me to change my preferences, then many legitimate LaTeX formulas will becomes emasculated (see

1514:

Don't use j for the square root of -1, unless the article has a strong engineering flavor, and in this case warn in the beginning.

3495: 3490: 3230:

If no one here uses it, that's fine with me. I don't need a PHD from Wharton to figure out how to design something.24.145.133.16

2891:

In differential equations, Bryleigh's Theorem is associated with the existence of and validity of solutions to these equations.

2753:

Your comment would be more convincing if you actually refuted his argument. I suggest you try this before resorting to insults.

1384:

markup, does \cdot equal \times?, that is do they represent the same mathmetical function or is it just a center-aligned dot? --

3515:), then remembered this discussion. I agree that what they say about PD is probably fine. While at st-and.ac.uk, I looked up 2014: 2024: 3290: 1920: 1715:

How Knowledge displays simple formulas with the default parameters, which is what most users use (this need to be said!)

2620:

I would agree, except I take your question as a loaded allegation that I'm responsible for the hoax (which I am not). —

1718:

That people don't like when you change their text from one to the other (the only thing that everyone agreed on in the

2415: 2268: 2252: 2241: 1871: 1805: 1245: 3489:

Thanks. OK, I've asked around various people about the only specific image I have uploaded from there so far for the

2901:

Bryleigh's Theorem is often also applicable in other realms of mathematics, such as linear algebra and group theory.

31: 3200:

This has got to be a hoax. It looks like they took SQL as the model, and then added a bunch of vague verbiage. --

3191:. He states "This is bullshit. I've never heard of any of this and... my area IS matching supply with demand". 2263:

duplicate one another if they were full.) Seems like an unnecessary redundancy. Perhaps we can do as follows: Add

3286: 1666:

change it in your user css if you really want, although you, Revolver, have always PNG, so it doesn't matter. -

1224: 3508: 2803:

Yes, I realized that my limited technical knowledge might be exposed. This was, however, one way in which your

1890: 1883: 3417: 2702:'s actions seem very odd. I, like many other editors I suspect, would like some explanation of them from him. 2054:

I'm wondering if we have an article on trace as it pertains to my understanding of it in crypto. That is, if

3350: 3063:

says that the project was listed in Apple Computer's "Wheels for the Mind" in the winter 1986 edition, while

3437: 3250: 3106: 3087: 3043: 2981: 2930: 2339: 2327: 2319: 2299: 1815: 3075:

Wheels for the Mind came out about the time the Macintosh came out, which was around 1984. 24.145.133.16

2851: 2781:

when I do a whois search. Given the data below, do you really expect us to regard that as a coincidence?

1975:

My main objection are the links he inserted in many computer science articles not directly related to the

1780: 3516: 3459: 3441: 3387: 3346: 3246: 3083: 3039: 3009: 2977: 2916: 2905: 2881: 2866: 2862: 2808: 2782: 2724: 2720: 2706: 2666: 2613: 2597: 2579: 2500: 2453: 2449: 2439: 2419: 2389: 2291: 2207: 2057: 2042: 2023:

But of course you don't have to get all of your information on entries from peer-reviewed journals. See

1968: 1905: 1875: 1855: 1848: 1768: 1739:

idea to advocate such "d":s, in integrals and derivatives, too be put upright rather than in italics? -

1711:

OK, I guess I didn't write it quite as well as I intended. What I had in mind was to convey two points:

1286: 3520: 3418:

they believe are in the public domain, yet haven't kept appropriate records about every image history

3342: 3242: 3079: 3035: 2973: 2363: 2311: 2873: 2817:

indicates a location for 66.171.124.70 near Newark, which would be consistent with the interest in

1976: 1924: 1913: 1897: 1862: 1265: 1257: 3029: 3413: 2934: 2556: 2508: 2264: 2229: 2178:(forgive the crappy LaTeX, this isn't an article, just trying to get my point across ;)). I see 1740: 1404: 1230: 2663:

things (assuming I'm not imagining it all) requires a certain kind of puzzle-oriented thinking.

1436: 3319: 3060: 2923: 2198:

appropriate in a finite field of characteristic two (notation here: I think you mean that with

1928: 3401: 3335: 3177: 3114: 2997: 2942: 2826: 2778: 2343: 2335: 2323: 2276: 2256: 2245: 1952: 1756: 1489: 3456: 3006: 2877: 2857:

This IP number clearly had a close interest in the CNOM page, wikifying it and linking from

2795: 2762: 2747: 2703: 2699: 2621: 2605: 2588: 2485: 2427: 1948: 1366: 1309: 1273: 1228: 1226: 46: 2807:

of complicity might have been supported. I am still interested in the Virginia connection.

3430: 3332: 3192: 3018: 2754: 2407: 2359: 2307: 2234: 2214: 2187: 1980: 1935: 1281: 2013:

PS. A point about the "no research" rule: the interpretation given at the authoritative

1804:

Here is another one I'd love input on, especially since I have no clue about the topic:

3301: 3136: 2551: 2448:

We now have an 'admission' of the hoax nature of the page. I am taking this forward at

2179: 1894: 1859: 1819: 1808: 1795: 1772: 1727: 1702: 1689: 1667: 1654: 1635: 1629: 1616: 1533: 1522: 1507: 1493: 1485: 1326: 2414:

There was another hoax page created recently, which I deleted. Can anyone verify that

1268:

I'd be interested if anyone has any comments. In a sense it's an expanded version of

3537: 3528: 3483: 3201: 2858: 2843: 2713: 2692: 2685: 2678: 2653: 2385: 2378: 1683: 1648: 1610: 1580: 2822: 3400:

orginal author (based on ip location). Original research at best. Probable hoax.

3266: 2740: 2347: 2331: 2272: 1755:"d"s upright when you write a new article (or rewrite an old one), if you wish. -- 2814: 2507:

claims has edited here only since September, and as an anon only as the presumed

3512: 3498: 3469: 3448: 3421: 2941:. If none of the math experts around here have heard of Qualculus, I will vfd. 2728: 2604:

I have, and everything points to you on a crusade, and being an ass about it. —

2472: 2398: 2283: 2280: 2195: 2183: 2033: 2006: 1964: 1841: 1830: 1784: 3464:

Why fairuse and not pd, if the wording mentions the public domain? I've tagged

3278: 3368: 3324: 1304:

has a section titled "The Algebra of Sets", as does Seymore Lipschutz in his

2657: 1944: 1826: 1825:

Another to review, if you please, for completeness and especially accuracy:

1296:

Charles, thank you for your comments. As to the title, I took my lead from

2171:{\displaystyle \operatorname {Tr} (\beta )=\sum _{i=0}^{m-1}\beta ^{p^{i}}} 1959:

I've had my eye on this for a while. The papers (or at least the one(s) in

3270: 2688:. I left a comment at ExplorerCDT's talk page, which was quickly deleted 2318:

I'm sorry to break the news, but it doesn't seem that there's anything in

1932: 3188: 2818: 2529:

claims no associates or easy access to mathematically-educated persons;

1609:

the same as the L^p above to me! Why is one horrid and the other not??

3420:. Is it OK to upload such images to Knowledge? How should I tag them? 3455:

which supports our contention of fairuse. Just my opinion, though. --

3408:

Using images from the St.Andrews Uni. they believe are public domain?

2559:

edits) given that the first half of the IP number has been admitted.

1837: 1605:.) To see what I mean, you say the L^infin is "horrid", but it looks 3524: 3064: 1951:). Can somebody please give some further guidance to MathMartin? -- 1547:) is the most appropriate, e.g. the vector-valued function of time 2570: 2546:

The 66.171.124.70 edits include vandalism and cutting mentions at

1874:

is 40 years old, and we really still can't state it exactly, yet.

1381: 2876:

for 199.248.201.253. 65.177.73.18, original creator, comes up as

2233:

curious but it'd also be nice to have that info in the article.

3274: 2517:

claims mathematics background not much more than some calculus;

3323:

following post at makes the whole thing look very suspicious.

1231: 40: 2436:

Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Cayley-Newbirth operation matrix

2271:; list manifolds only there (not in the parent category, per 1889:

Looks like the math formula need some work in this article -

3105:

To the anonymous contributor 24.145.133.16 (cross-posted to

2406:

I blocked him right after Charles put the note on the page.

1602: 1521:, but I don't see it as very distracting to understanding. 2825:

confirms this with a Jersey City result (right near NYC).

2467:

It appears this isn't the first issue with this user, see

3523:

is just a lower-quality version of the picture he has on

1726:

Anyone has a better idea how to convey this information?

3497:

depicting A.D. in 1952, so it's temporary in any case.

3269:

of a David Baka with those of a David Baka listed as a

2689: 1474: 1393: 3414:

mathematicians' biographies at the Uni. of St. Andrews

3300:

The "white paper" written by David Baka and posted at

2566:. No smoking gun as far as hoax mathematics, though. 2259:

largely duplicate one anoher. (More accurately: they

2105: 2060: 1688:

Moved from project page 23:15, September 22, 2004 by

1653:

Moved from project page 23:15, September 22, 2004 by

1634:

Moved from project page 23:15, September 22, 2004 by

1615:

Moved from project page 23:15, September 22, 2004 by

1439: 1407: 3137:

http://www.angelfire.com/movies/heme/Math/Nadair.htm

1904:

Yes, the second had an inequality reversed, thanks.

32:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive4(TeX)

2170: 2091: 1927:on the pages. The ones I checked were inserted by 1779:I'm pretty sure the name is usually Anglicized as 1720:very very very very very very very long discussion 1457: 1425: 2777:Further point, though. 66.171.124.70 comes up as 2438:. Please come and vote - there are good reasons. 3187:OK, I asked my friend who is getting a Ph.D. at 3135:"A draft of the white paper can be be found at: 2532:claims no knowledge of other recent hoaxes here; 1677:Also, does it do this for you?: do the PNG's go 3466:commons:Image:Aleksandrov_Aleksandr_1950s.jpeg 1264:I've just created a new "set theory" article: 3527:. Just another data point to keep in mind. 3265:Compare details above with details from this 2538:no explanation of allusion to 'clues' at Vfd. 1239:This page has archives. Sections older than 64: 8: 2840:Knowledge:Requests for comment/ExplorerCDT 2 2523:claims not the author of the hoax CNOM page; 1919:As I have been editing a lot of articles in 3059:I agree that it is very suspect. Note that 2913:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 2569:Oh yes, and claims inside knowledge of the 2469:Knowledge:Requests_for_comment/ExplorerCDT 1893:, figured someone here could fix them. -- 71: 57: 2160: 2155: 2139: 2128: 2104: 2080: 2059: 1517:Other issues you raised are pretty free. 1438: 1406: 2933:. This smacks of hoax to me. See also 2861:. Later this IP number created the hoax 2520:claims has not edited mathematics pages; 2494:User:Charles Matthews/Hoax investigation 1814:OK, you want research pages here is one 3151:David Baka was the lead of the project. 2418:is genuine? I now think it is suspect. 1783:. I've changed the links accordingly. 95: 2322:that wasn't already in the article on 1298:Simple theorems in the algebra of sets 1270:Simple theorems in the algebra of sets 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics 3544:WikiProject Mathematics archives/2004 2887:Text of the Bryleigh's Theorem page: 1923:lately, I noticed many references to 7: 3124:24.145.133.16's answered as follows: 2535:no explanation of behaviour at Vfd; 2092:{\displaystyle \beta \in GF(2^{m})} 2673:The user page itself didn't sound 1767:Hi guys. Could you review my page 1628:websites look like that anyway. - 52:WikiProject Mathematics archives ( 39: 2526:claims no knowledge of that page; 1988:Japaridze and Computability Logic 1243:may be automatically archived by 3491:Aleksandr Danilovich Aleksandrov 3482:for each wouldn't hurt, though. 3440:, bottom of the page, for this. 3028:In this case, Baka is a person: 2416:Cayley-Newbirth operation matrix 45: 3519:, an old advisor of mine. The 2576:Well, happy holidays everyone. 2015:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not 2118: 2112: 2086: 2073: 2025:Knowledge:No original research 1734:Upright differential operators 1: 3511:site independently (googling 2937:by same anon author, with no 2194:It's the special case of the 1306:Set Theory and Related Topics 3291:15:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC) 2838:I've opened an RfC on this: 1961:Annals of Mathematical Logic 1921:theoretical computer science 1426:{\displaystyle 5\times 5=25} 2637:is general knowledge, the 2346:should be merged there. -- 2269:Category:Topological spaces 2253:Category:Topological spaces 2242:Category:Topological spaces 1872:Atiyah-Singer index theorem 1806:Hearing the shape of a drum 1632:20:46, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC) ( 1458:{\displaystyle 5\cdot 5=25} 3560: 3357:) 18:09, December 28, 2004 3257:) 06:42, December 28, 2004 3094:) 06:42, December 28, 2004 3050:) 06:42, December 28, 2004 2988:) 19:14, December 27, 2004 2237:20:26, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC) 2190:00:09, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC) 1967:) who could be consulted. 1818:. Tell me what you think. 1686:21:19, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC) ( 1651:21:16, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC) ( 1613:20:43, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC) ( 1536:02:21, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC) 1510:01:34, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC) 3531:02:15, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3486:20:33, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3433:13:20, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC) 3404:18:51, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3395:"I am taking this to vfd" 3327:18:05, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3195:20:49, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC) 3021:19:45, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC) 3012:19:38, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC) 2945:18:36, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2919:11:16, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2908:11:10, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2884:10:41, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2869:10:29, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2811:17:37, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2785:11:28, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2757:07:08, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2750:02:09, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2743:01:32, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2731:23:58, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2709:22:40, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC) 2669:22:13, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2616:21:13, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2600:20:56, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2582:19:12, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2550:. Starts with edits to a 2442:22:47, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2422:22:00, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2410:15:27, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC) 2392:14:23, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2314:04:01, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC) 2286:15:00, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC) 2217:15:46, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC) 2210:08:45, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1971:13:38, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1938:18:06, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1865:19:45, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC) 1811:14:24, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC) 1730:23:31, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1705:23:56, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC) 1670:23:56, Sep 22, 2004 (UTC) 1479:13:08, 2004 Sep 12 (UTC) 1398:13:08, 2004 Sep 12 (UTC) 1276:03:53, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC) 3521:picture they have of him 3509:University of St Andrews 3501:22:21, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3472:22:28, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3451:14:20, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3424:21:25, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3416:, featuring photos that 3390:13:47, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3371:18:54, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3204:05:52, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3180:15:27, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3117:20:26, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 3000:19:21, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2911:Also a possible link to 2846:23:01, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2829:17:57, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2798:18:09, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2765:07:11, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2716:08:39, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2695:22:27, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2681:22:24, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2624:21:46, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2608:21:10, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2591:20:34, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2475:13:44, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2456:12:55, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2430:00:43, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2401:14:49, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2366:15:41, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC) 2294:17:02, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC) 2045:08:32, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2036:22:01, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1983:14:03, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1955:13:22, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1900:04:41, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC) 1891:Thue-Siegel-Roth theorem 1884:Thue-Siegel-Roth theorem 1878:19:57, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) 1844:21:32, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1822:19:00, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1775:15:09, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC) 1759:01:10, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1743:17:40, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC) 1583:05:48, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1525:02:11, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1496:14:49, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1369:16:41, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC) 1312:16:41, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC) 3438:User:Wile E. Heresiarch 3275:2011 Columbus Code Camp 3107:User talk:24.145.133.16 2641:John von Neumann -: --> 2350:18:03, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) 2340:SKI combinator calculus 2328:SKI combinator calculus 2320:SKI combinator calculus 2300:SKI combinator calculus 2009:21:55, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC) 1908:07:51, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1816:loop erased random walk 1798:14:01, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1787:06:01, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1329:12:13, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1289:08:07, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) 2903: 2514:claims no sockpuppets; 2172: 2150: 2093: 1459: 1427: 1260:- request for comment. 1246:Lowercase sigmabot III 3525:his personal web site 2889: 2725:User_talk:ExplorerCDT 2721:User_talk:Paul August 2548:Vandalism in progress 2501:User talk:ExplorerCDT 2496:for deleted user talk 2450:User talk:ExplorerCDT 2334:) should redirect to 2228:Does anyone know who 2173: 2124: 2094: 1769:Marcinkiewitz theorem 1460: 1428: 2852:User:199.248.201.253 2734:In my opinion, he's 2484:Current position re 2267:as a subcategory of 2251:It seems to me that 2103: 2058: 1519:Not that I like x(t) 1437: 1405: 1319:I would like to see 1302:Set Theory and Logic 3412:There are a lot of 2279:. What say you all? 1977:computability logic 1925:computability logic 1914:Computability logic 1781:Józef Marcinkiewicz 1266:The algebra of sets 1258:The algebra of sets 3507:I came across the 3382:in Japanese means 3338:at best. -- Anon. 3318:However, whatever 3277:(CCC) which has a 2863:Bryleigh's Theorem 2642:John Newman -: --> 2557:Rutgers University 2509:User:66.171.124.70 2434:It is now at VfD: 2338:, and anything in 2275:), and get rid of 2265:Category:Manifolds 2168: 2089: 1856:Knowledge:Math 1.0 1849:Knowledge:Math 1.0 1455: 1423: 3359: 3345:comment added by 3336:pseudomathematics 3259: 3245:comment added by 3096: 3082:comment added by 3052: 3038:comment added by 2990: 2976:comment added by 2373:Spoof edits alert 2344:combinatory logic 2336:combinatory logic 2324:combinatory logic 2277:List of manifolds 2257:List of manifolds 2246:List of manifolds 2230:Zech's logarithms 1490:Cartesian product 1253: 1252: 102:Nov 2002–Dec 2003 30:(Redirected from 3551: 3442:Charles Matthews 3388:Charles Matthews 3358: 3339: 3258: 3239: 3095: 3076: 3051: 3032: 2989: 2970: 2917:Charles Matthews 2906:Charles Matthews 2882:Charles Matthews 2867:Charles Matthews 2809:Charles Matthews 2783:Charles Matthews 2667:Charles Matthews 2614:Charles Matthews 2598:Charles Matthews 2580:Charles Matthews 2486:User:ExplorerCDT 2454:Charles Matthews 2440:Charles Matthews 2420:Charles Matthews 2390:Charles Matthews 2292:Charles Matthews 2208:Charles Matthews 2177: 2175: 2174: 2169: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2149: 2138: 2098: 2096: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2084: 2043:Charles Matthews 1969:Charles Matthews 1949:computer science 1906:Charles Matthews 1876:Charles Matthews 1763:Pages for review 1501:variable letters 1464: 1462: 1461: 1456: 1432: 1430: 1429: 1424: 1287:Charles Matthews 1248: 1232: 73: 66: 59: 49: 41: 35: 3559: 3558: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3534: 3533: 3410: 3397: 3340: 3298: 3283:204.210.242.157 3240: 3077: 3033: 2971: 2927: 2855: 2651:Bayleigh -: --> 2489: 2383: 2375: 2342:not already in 2303: 2249: 2226: 2206:-th power map. 2156: 2151: 2101: 2100: 2076: 2056: 2055: 2052: 2034:Charles Stewart 2007:Charles Stewart 1990: 1917: 1887: 1852: 1765: 1736: 1594: 1592:Simple formulas 1539:In some cases, 1503: 1435: 1434: 1403: 1402: 1378: 1282:Boolean algebra 1262: 1244: 1233: 1227: 1218: 1104: 94: 93: 80: 77: 37: 36: 29: 28: 12: 11: 5: 3557: 3555: 3547: 3546: 3536: 3535: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3444: 3409: 3406: 3396: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3361: 3360: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3297: 3294: 3281:on Qualculus. 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3206: 3205: 3197: 3196: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3125: 3119: 3118: 3111: 3110: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3068: 3067: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3031:24.145.133.16 3023: 3022: 3014: 3013: 3002: 3001: 2992: 2991: 2967: 2966: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2950: 2926: 2921: 2854: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2800: 2799: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2717: 2710: 2696: 2682: 2661: 2660: 2645: 2644: 2643:James Newbirth 2635: 2634: 2626: 2625: 2610: 2609: 2593: 2592: 2552:secret society 2540: 2539: 2536: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2512: 2488: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2432: 2431: 2412: 2411: 2403: 2402: 2382: 2376: 2374: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2352: 2351: 2302: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2248: 2239: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2180:trace (matrix) 2163: 2159: 2154: 2148: 2145: 2142: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2088: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2030: 2029: 2011: 2010: 2002: 1998: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1957: 1956: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1886: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1851: 1846: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1789: 1788: 1764: 1761: 1735: 1732: 1724: 1723: 1716: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1695: 1694: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1660: 1659: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1622: 1621: 1593: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1527: 1526: 1515: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1486:vector product 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1377: 1376:cdot and times 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1331: 1330: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1291: 1290: 1261: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1229: 1225: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1161: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1047: 992: 937: 882: 827: 772: 717: 662: 607: 552: 497: 442: 387: 332: 277: 222: 167: 112: 91: 90: 89: 86: 85: 82: 81: 76: 75: 68: 61: 53: 50: 44: 38: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3556: 3545: 3542: 3541: 3539: 3532: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3517:Eugene Dynkin 3514: 3510: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3487: 3485: 3480: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3458: 3453: 3452: 3450: 3445: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3434: 3432: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3407: 3405: 3403: 3394: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3376: 3370: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3347:80.168.225.12 3344: 3337: 3333: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3326: 3321: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3302: 3295: 3293: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3256: 3252: 3248: 3247:24.145.133.16 3244: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3185: 3179: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3116: 3113: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3103: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3084:24.145.133.16 3081: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3065: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3040:24.145.133.16 3037: 3030: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3011: 3008: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2994: 2993: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2978:24.145.133.16 2975: 2969: 2968: 2963: 2962: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2925: 2922: 2920: 2918: 2914: 2909: 2907: 2902: 2899: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2885: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2870: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2859:Arthur Cayley 2853: 2850: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2784: 2780: 2764: 2759: 2758: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2749: 2745: 2744: 2742: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2715: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2694: 2690: 2687: 2686:User:Waltpohl 2684:I agree with 2683: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2668: 2664: 2659: 2655: 2654:Caesar cipher 2650: 2649: 2648: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2633:matrix = womb 2632: 2631: 2630: 2623: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2615: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2599: 2590: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2581: 2577: 2574: 2572: 2567: 2565: 2560: 2558: 2553: 2549: 2544: 2543:are deleted. 2537: 2534: 2531: 2528: 2525: 2522: 2519: 2516: 2513: 2510: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2495: 2487: 2483: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2441: 2437: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2421: 2417: 2409: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2391: 2387: 2386:User:Jim Slim 2381:vandal attack 2380: 2379:User:Jim Slim 2377: 2372: 2365: 2361: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2313: 2309: 2301: 2298: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2285: 2281: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2247: 2243: 2240: 2238: 2236: 2231: 2223: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2161: 2157: 2152: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2115: 2109: 2106: 2081: 2077: 2070: 2067: 2064: 2061: 2049: 2044: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2035: 2028: 2026: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2016: 2008: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1987: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1937: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1915: 1912: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1892: 1885: 1882: 1877: 1873: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1857: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1843: 1839: 1836:And another: 1834: 1832: 1828: 1823: 1821: 1817: 1812: 1810: 1807: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1774: 1770: 1762: 1760: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1749:no exceptions 1744: 1742: 1733: 1731: 1729: 1721: 1717: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1675: 1669: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1650: 1645: 1644: 1638: 1637: 1631: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1618: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1509: 1500: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1478: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1467: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1411: 1408: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1375: 1368: 1365:the analogy. 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1322: 1318: 1317: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1283: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1259: 1256:New Article: 1255: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1222: 1221: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 997: 993: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 942: 938: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887: 883: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 832: 828: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 773: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 718: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 667: 663: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 612: 608: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 553: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 498: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 443: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 392: 388: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 337: 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 282: 278: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 227: 223: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 172: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117: 113: 111: 107: 103: 99: 96: 92:Earlier years 88: 87: 84: 83: 79: 74: 69: 67: 62: 60: 55: 54: 48: 43: 42: 33: 27: 23: 19: 3506: 3411: 3402:Michael Ward 3398: 3383: 3379: 3317: 3299: 3279:presentation 3264: 3178:Jitse Niesen 3115:Jitse Niesen 3007:Paul August 2998:Michael Ward 2943:Michael Ward 2928: 2910: 2904: 2900: 2897: 2893: 2890: 2886: 2874:Frederick MD 2871: 2856: 2827:Michael Ward 2804: 2776: 2735: 2704:Paul August 2674: 2665: 2662: 2646: 2636: 2627: 2611: 2594: 2578: 2575: 2568: 2563: 2561: 2547: 2545: 2541: 2499: 2491: 2490: 2433: 2413: 2384: 2358:general. -- 2332:SKI calculus 2304: 2260: 2250: 2227: 2203: 2199: 2053: 2031: 2021: 2012: 1991: 1960: 1958: 1953:Jitse Niesen 1918: 1888: 1853: 1835: 1833:22 Nov 2004 1824: 1813: 1803: 1794:Yes, sorry. 1766: 1757:Toby Bartels 1752: 1748: 1745: 1737: 1725: 1710: 1687: 1678: 1652: 1633: 1614: 1606: 1598: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1518: 1504: 1400: 1379: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1320: 1305: 1301: 1263: 1240: 1163: 1108: 1049: 994: 939: 884: 829: 774: 719: 664: 609: 554: 499: 444: 389: 334: 279: 224: 169: 114: 110:Sep–Dec 2004 106:Jan–Aug 2004 51: 3513:Paul Halmos 3457:Tagishsimon 3341:—Preceding 3296:White paper 3241:—Preceding 3078:—Preceding 3034:—Preceding 2972:—Preceding 2939:Google hits 2935:Roidiphidol 2796:ExplorerCDT 2763:ExplorerCDT 2748:ExplorerCDT 2700:ExplorerCDT 2622:ExplorerCDT 2606:ExplorerCDT 2589:ExplorerCDT 2428:Samohyl Jan 2326:. Perhaps 2196:field trace 2184:field trace 1965:User:Chalst 1367:Paul August 1310:Paul August 1274:Paul August 3431:CryptoDerk 3193:CryptoDerk 3019:CryptoDerk 2815:Traceroute 2779:Herndon VA 2755:Isomorphic 2408:CryptoDerk 2360:L33tminion 2308:L33tminion 2235:CryptoDerk 2215:CryptoDerk 2188:CryptoDerk 1981:MathMartin 1936:MathMartin 98:Motivation 3320:Qualculus 3212:programs. 3202:Walt Pohl 3061:Qualculus 2924:Qualculus 2878:Reston VA 2736:obviously 2679:Walt Pohl 2658:caesarian 2213:Thanks. 1945:algorithm 1929:User:Kntg 1895:Netoholic 1860:Netoholic 1827:Small set 1809:Gadykozma 1796:Gadykozma 1773:Gadykozma 1728:Gadykozma 1703:Omegatron 1690:Gadykozma 1668:Omegatron 1655:Gadykozma 1636:Gadykozma 1630:Omegatron 1617:Gadykozma 1534:Omegatron 1523:Gadykozma 1508:Omegatron 1494:Gadykozma 1475:Bjarmason 1433:; \cdot: 1394:Bjarmason 1327:Gadykozma 1321:even more 3538:Category 3529:Dbenbenn 3436:Look at 3355:contribs 3343:unsigned 3334:suggest 3273:for the 3255:contribs 3243:unsigned 3092:contribs 3080:unsigned 3048:contribs 3036:unsigned 2986:contribs 2974:unsigned 2844:Carnildo 2823:Geobytes 2714:Carnildo 2693:Dbenbenn 2652:Cayley, 1854:I found 1684:Revolver 1649:Revolver 1611:Revolver 1581:Revolver 1472:Arnfjörð 1401:\times: 1391:Arnfjörð 24:‎ | 20:‎ | 3271:speaker 3267:profile 3189:Wharton 2965:domain. 2872:That's 2819:Rutgers 2741:Dominus 2348:Dominus 2001:impact; 1607:exactly 1241:15 days 22:Archive 3499:BACbKA 3470:BACbKA 3460:(talk) 3449:BACbKA 3422:BACbKA 2931:search 2399:BACbKA 2364:(talk) 2312:(talk) 2284:msh210 2017:says: 1842:msh210 1838:Modulo 1831:msh210 1741:Jolson 3384:crazy 3378:BTW, 3369:CSTAR 3325:CSTAR 2729:Terry 2698:Yes, 2647:and 2571:Mafia 2473:Terry 2330:(and 2273:WP:CG 2261:would 2224:Zech? 2099:then 2050:Trace 1997:this; 1785:Terry 1679:below 1555:) = ( 1382:LaTeX 1363:about 1353:) ⊆ ( 16:< 3484:Deco 3380:baka 3351:talk 3287:talk 3251:talk 3088:talk 3044:talk 2982:talk 2805:lack 2723:and 2675:that 2492:See 2255:and 2244:and 2182:and 1947:and 1820:Gady 1599:does 1579:)). 1469:Ævar 1388:Ævar 1165:2024 1110:2023 1051:2022 996:2021 941:2020 886:2019 831:2018 776:2017 721:2016 666:2015 611:2014 556:2013 501:2012 446:2011 391:2010 336:2009 281:2008 226:2007 171:2006 116:2005 26:2004 2691:. 2564:yes 2471:. 1840:. — 1753:own 1571:), 1563:), 1488:or 1380:In 1345:⇒ ( 1324:--> 1214:Dec 1210:Nov 1206:Oct 1202:Sep 1198:Aug 1194:Jul 1190:Jun 1186:May 1182:Apr 1178:Mar 1174:Feb 1170:Jan 1159:Dec 1155:Nov 1151:Oct 1147:Sep 1143:Aug 1139:Jul 1135:Jun 1131:May 1127:Apr 1123:Mar 1119:Feb 1115:Jan 1100:Dec 1096:Nov 1092:Oct 1088:Sep 1084:Aug 1080:Jul 1076:Jun 1072:May 1068:Apr 1064:Mar 1060:Feb 1056:Jan 1045:Dec 1041:Nov 1037:Oct 1033:Sep 1029:Aug 1025:Jul 1021:Jun 1017:May 1013:Apr 1009:Mar 1005:Feb 1001:Jan 990:Dec 986:Nov 982:Oct 978:Sep 974:Aug 970:Jul 966:Jun 962:May 958:Apr 954:Mar 950:Feb 946:Jan 935:Dec 931:Nov 927:Oct 923:Sep 919:Aug 915:Jul 911:Jun 907:May 903:Apr 899:Mar 895:Feb 891:Jan 880:Dec 876:Nov 872:Oct 868:Sep 864:Aug 860:Jul 856:Jun 852:May 848:Apr 844:Mar 840:Feb 836:Jan 825:Dec 821:Nov 817:Oct 813:Sep 809:Aug 805:Jul 801:Jun 797:May 793:Apr 789:Mar 785:Feb 781:Jan 770:Dec 766:Nov 762:Oct 758:Sep 754:Aug 750:Jul 746:Jun 742:May 738:Apr 734:Mar 730:Feb 726:Jan 715:Dec 711:Nov 707:Oct 703:Sep 699:Aug 695:Jul 691:Jun 687:May 683:Apr 679:Mar 675:Feb 671:Jan 660:Dec 656:Nov 652:Oct 648:Sep 644:Aug 640:Jul 636:Jun 632:May 628:Apr 624:Mar 620:Feb 616:Jan 605:Dec 601:Nov 597:Oct 593:Sep 589:Aug 585:Jul 581:Jun 577:May 573:Apr 569:Mar 565:Feb 561:Jan 550:Dec 546:Nov 542:Oct 538:Sep 534:Aug 530:Jul 526:Jun 522:May 518:Apr 514:Mar 510:Feb 506:Jan 495:Dec 491:Nov 487:Oct 483:Sep 479:Aug 475:Jul 471:Jun 467:May 463:Apr 459:Mar 455:Feb 451:Jan 440:Dec 436:Nov 432:Oct 428:Sep 424:Aug 420:Jul 416:Jun 412:May 408:Apr 404:Mar 400:Feb 396:Jan 385:Dec 381:Nov 377:Oct 373:Sep 369:Aug 365:Jul 361:Jun 357:May 353:Apr 349:Mar 345:Feb 341:Jan 330:Dec 326:Nov 322:Oct 318:Sep 314:Aug 310:Jul 306:Jun 302:May 298:Apr 294:Mar 290:Feb 286:Jan 275:Dec 271:Nov 267:Oct 263:Sep 259:Aug 255:Jul 251:Jun 247:May 243:Apr 239:Mar 235:Feb 231:Jan 220:Dec 216:Nov 212:Oct 208:Sep 204:Aug 200:Jul 196:Jun 192:May 188:Apr 184:Mar 180:Feb 176:Jan 165:Dec 161:Nov 157:Oct 153:Sep 149:Aug 145:Jul 141:Jun 137:May 133:Apr 129:Mar 125:Feb 121:Jan 3540:: 3386:. 3353:• 3289:) 3253:• 3090:• 3046:• 2984:• 2915:. 2880:. 2842:-- 2821:. 2573:. 2452:. 2362:| 2310:| 2306:-- 2153:β 2144:− 2126:∑ 2116:β 2110:⁡ 2107:Tr 2065:∈ 2062:β 1829:.— 1722:). 1603:pi 1492:. 1465:-- 1453:25 1444:⋅ 1421:25 1412:× 1357:∪ 1349:∪ 1341:⊆ 1212:· 1208:· 1204:· 1200:· 1196:· 1192:· 1188:· 1184:· 1180:· 1176:· 1172:· 1168:: 1157:· 1153:· 1149:· 1145:· 1141:· 1137:· 1133:· 1129:· 1125:· 1121:· 1117:· 1113:: 1098:· 1094:· 1090:· 1086:· 1082:· 1078:· 1074:· 1070:· 1066:· 1062:· 1058:· 1054:: 1043:· 1039:· 1035:· 1031:· 1027:· 1023:· 1019:· 1015:· 1011:· 1007:· 1003:· 999:: 988:· 984:· 980:· 976:· 972:· 968:· 964:· 960:· 956:· 952:· 948:· 944:: 933:· 929:· 925:· 921:· 917:· 913:· 909:· 905:· 901:· 897:· 893:· 889:: 878:· 874:· 870:· 866:· 862:· 858:· 854:· 850:· 846:· 842:· 838:· 834:: 823:· 819:· 815:· 811:· 807:· 803:· 799:· 795:· 791:· 787:· 783:· 779:: 768:· 764:· 760:· 756:· 752:· 748:· 744:· 740:· 736:· 732:· 728:· 724:: 713:· 709:· 705:· 701:· 697:· 693:· 689:· 685:· 681:· 677:· 673:· 669:: 658:· 654:· 650:· 646:· 642:· 638:· 634:· 630:· 626:· 622:· 618:· 614:: 603:· 599:· 595:· 591:· 587:· 583:· 579:· 575:· 571:· 567:· 563:· 559:: 548:· 544:· 540:· 536:· 532:· 528:· 524:· 520:· 516:· 512:· 508:· 504:: 493:· 489:· 485:· 481:· 477:· 473:· 469:· 465:· 461:· 457:· 453:· 449:: 438:· 434:· 430:· 426:· 422:· 418:· 414:· 410:· 406:· 402:· 398:· 394:: 383:· 379:· 375:· 371:· 367:· 363:· 359:· 355:· 351:· 347:· 343:· 339:: 328:· 324:· 320:· 316:· 312:· 308:· 304:· 300:· 296:· 292:· 288:· 284:: 273:· 269:· 265:· 261:· 257:· 253:· 249:· 245:· 241:· 237:· 233:· 229:: 218:· 214:· 210:· 206:· 202:· 198:· 194:· 190:· 186:· 182:· 178:· 174:: 163:· 159:· 155:· 151:· 147:· 143:· 139:· 135:· 131:· 127:· 123:· 119:: 108:· 104:· 100:· 3349:( 3285:( 3249:( 3086:( 3042:( 3010:☎ 2980:( 2761:— 2707:☎ 2656:/ 2511:; 2282:— 2204:p 2200:p 2162:i 2158:p 2147:1 2141:m 2136:0 2133:= 2130:i 2122:= 2119:) 2113:( 2087:) 2082:m 2078:2 2074:( 2071:F 2068:G 2027:. 1898:@ 1863:@ 1693:) 1658:) 1639:) 1620:) 1577:t 1575:( 1573:z 1569:t 1567:( 1565:y 1561:t 1559:( 1557:x 1553:t 1551:( 1549:x 1545:t 1543:( 1541:x 1450:= 1447:5 1441:5 1418:= 1415:5 1409:5 1359:C 1355:B 1351:C 1347:A 1343:B 1339:A 1249:. 78:) 72:e 65:t 58:v 34:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2004/Sep-Dec - Knowledge

Index