1452:
1355:
apparently "silly" and "too simple" to be useful. Of course, by "useful" Arthur means "useful to him." I am pretty sure that "silly" is meaningless insofar as mathematics are concerned. Perhaps some other editors could provide some meaningful constructive input to the situation, something Hans and Arthur never do, at least not until after a great deal of drama. Of course I, and
Hofstadter thought that something like this was perfectly illustrative. So lets see what is so terrible about it. I believe the biggest problem is pedantism.
1876:
public) it seems to be a good idea not to expect specific math knowledge beyond that of a "calculus learner". Generally you could argue anyhow that first chapters of an article usually should pick the most accessible approach/lowest abstraction level that still allows correct description. More abstract approaches can follow in later chapters. In other words it is not a question of encyclopedia versus textbook, but a question of what amount of knowledge is reasonable to assume for the majority of our readers (of math articles).--
1929:
working on the article. The primary issue that all authors should adhere to regardless of their personal preferences is to provide as much accessibility as possible for the elementary proofs or treatments. Btw. accessibility (ideally) includes motivation/inspiration as well, i. e. the elementary proof and its representation should not only be accessible regarding its formal individual steps, but his overall direction and the "proof idea" should (ideally) "make sense" to the less advanced reader as well.--
3486:. Then I discovered that "class representative" is also a mathematical term. So, as a courtesy, I changed the redirect into a disambiguation page. However, I do not have any mathematical background, so I do not feel qualified to populate "your" section of the disambiguation page. Currently the page is not compliant with wikipedia stylistic rules. So I would like to invite someone here to fix "your" section of the dab page, either by creating a stub for
40:
3682:, which says "An overriding principle is that style and formatting choices should be consistent within a Knowledge article". I contest this point of view, based on the idea that using math markup (where not necessary) as opposed to HTML markup in standalone formulas, creates more inconsistencies than really necessary. Can someone with with a cool head please have a say?
3774:, where insisting on unit length would only introduce a lot of pesky square roots into computations, so they are a legitimate subject in their own right. If there is to be a separate article then the stub should be expanded and if not then material should be added to the other article, but it's not clear to me which way to go at this point.--
2613:"Locally exact" = "closed", and I believe differentials in applied math are often locally exact. However, Arcfrk gives an example where a differential dQ is not even closed. The notation is effectively wishful thinking: we want dQ to be the differential of a heat function Q, but sometimes it simply isn't!
3770:) to a new article. The redirect was a bit dodgy because the concepts, while related, are different and the other article doesn't really cover the subject. On the other hand, the concepts are similar enough that they could be covered in the same article. Orthogonal bases often appear in contexts, such as
2827:
However bad the term may be, it is in wide use. Our encyclopedia should say something about what it means, supposing that a reliable and authoritative source can be found. The same page might cover the even more peculiar term "quarter-infinite". I also see that we have three articles that use the
2331:
is quite a mess at the moment. One of the major issues is an overabundance of disorganised examples. I've tried to condense the principles and procedures behind these examples into a concise description. Some help with cleaning up the article, as well as a review of my edits, would be appreciated; my
4221:
In general I would prefer that we avoid making fine typographical adjustments like these in
Knowledge articles. Our articles are not set in metal once and printed for all time; they get edited and updated and displayed on new browsers continually. Little tricks like this are hard to maintain and may
3834:
The problem is that, in such cases, editors often don't realize/don't care about the 'companion' article, and thus both articles end up with very similar information, with one of the two usually ending up poorly written. This can make maintenance quite a bother. So beware ... While this can be kept
2550:
In fact, in thermodynamics dQ is the standard notation for the differential of the heat Q, but as is well known, Q is not a well-defined quantity (i.e. dQ is not an exact — or even closed — 1–form), because it need not be conserved in a cyclical process, unlike the entropy S that is related to Q via
1448:
Dmcq has excellent points. There are lots of graphical improvements to make, including making it SVG instead of PNG, and making the lines much thinner. It's useful as an overview for new readers who may find the terminology hard to conceptualize; it would be even more useful if it contained examples
3215:
Plus I think the straightforward approach above though it may be cumbersome is probably a better explanation, the iterative approach could then be mentioned as an optimization. I think I'll have to look at that article to see why anyone would want m+n to be large though, I don't think I've seen one
3062:
Let the approximant be R(x)=N(x)/D(x) as defined in the article with the coefficients of N(x) and D(x) as yet undetermined. Compute f(x)D(x)–N(x) to order m+n in x. Set all coefficients equal to zero and solve the resulting system of linear equations. See also P. Wynn, The
Epsilon Algorithm and
2061:
I've added a corrected version of the old proof, in addition to the new one. A separate issue with the article, that also effects the presentation of the proof, is the lack of a proper statement of the chain rule for a function between two
Euclidean spaces. This should be in the several variables
1916:
Okay that's good. The question here is then: to what extent should an advanced proof inspire the presentation of an elementary proof? It is not an easy question. But a related question would be whether an elementary proof should be based on conceptual misunderstandings for simplicity. None of these
4332:
This article seems to be misnamed—presumably "uniqueness theorem" should be a disambiguation page pointing to this theorem among others. Anyone have any suggestions for a new name for this article? Also, what are some other important uniqueness theorems that a disambiguation page could point to?
2043:
The earlier proof, which fairly close to what
Geometry guy proposes, more easily generalizes to other situations. The new proof, however, is arguably somewhat simpler and probably closer to what can be found in a first year calculus textbook, despite initially being based on a fallacy. I think,
1928:
Well for the elementary proof and its presentation accessibility is the key. Whether behind the scenes it draws inspirations from a more abstract viewpoint/approach/concept or not, doesn't really matter that much imho, that's a secondary question depending on skills and preferences of the authors
1875:
Well our primary target as reader is still the (educated) general public and not mathematician or scientists. Or to put it this way we are first and foremost a general purpose encyclopedia (like britannica) and only secondly a special subject encyclopedia as well. For our primry target (general
4092:. Don't use the smaller size math mode in running text by invoking "scriptstyle". Usually italics is fine. You can't rely on anyone else seeing the page the way you see it, because of varying fonts, browser settings, browsers, operating systems, etc. So just stick to the tried-and-true. — Carl
1354:
We have yet another pissing match featuring Arthur and Hans. We have long established that there is an ongoing problem with mathematics articles being inaccessible to readers, with no meaningful progress on that issue. I have created this diagram so as to help in that regard. However, it is
2182:
redirects. (Hatnote back also.) That would be step one. Second would be to sort out the cases where it is definitely a Lie algebra: for a first pass just do those that say "algebra" in the page title. Then there are physics pages, and essentially it doesn't matter so much for those pages.
2876:
It's true, and unfortunate, that it can be confusing for people not familiar with the technical background; but surely that's more an argument for where to use it (only in technical contexts, not in explanations for the lay reader) rather than for not documenting the technical term?
1370:
Is it just me or does that diagram get larger and larger every time I see it. And the text below has turned into a mini essay. I tried to cut down the size to half the linear dimension once but obviously in vain - soon we'll be able to read it from the other end of a hall.
3127:
from the article. Mutliply f(x) and D(x), and subtract N(x). Then collect terms, discarding any of degree higher than m+n. Set the coefficients of x, x, ..., x equal to zero. You now have a system of m+n+1 linear equations in m+n+1 unknowns, namely the coefficients
1455:"). The caption-cum-essay must be trimmed brutally; captions are not supposed to be self-contained mini-articles. Arthur is right that it is nonsense to claim that most formal systems make all wffs into theorems (which is often taken as the formal definition an
1257:
up to scratch - it currently reads like a random assortment of paragraphs from a textbook, with no real structure or cohesion. I've started a discussion on the talk page, and edits will be happening over the next few days - more eyes and opinions welcome.
3312:
needs references. There seem to be five books that can be found via Google, and some papers. If someone can figure out which parts of which sources should be cited in which parts of the article before I or someone else gets to it, that would be useful.
2530:
To be more precise, quite often the notation dQ is used in applied math for a closed 1-form, where Q exists locally, but not globally. A practical example would be d(log x) = dx/x, where a choice of branch of logarithm is needed to integrate the 1-form.
3894:
If we decide that we don't want to be associated with the guideline any more, it would be possible to remove our project from the list at the top of the guideline page. However, keeping the guidelines up to date seems like a better option to me. — Carl
1901:
No of course not, as i said later on in the article there can be more advanced treatments of the same subject (assuming a different level of knowledge), but normally we should not start the article with those more advanced treatments of the article's
4199:
My italic I lacks serifs, but the teletype I does indeed appear to be slanted
Courier. It looks peculiar. It's too short, since the top bar of the equals sign is just below the top bar of the I. And it's too blocky, because Courier is very much a
1535:
you think
Hoftstadter says that a formal system will "often" define all of its well-formed formulas as theorems. A quote with a section name so that I can find the passage in my Penguin 1980 edition of GEB would be useful. In the discussion of the
2044:
once the original proof is streamlined a bit, both proofs add value to the article. One is more useful to those just starting out, and the other useful to those encountering this material a second time in or after a first course on analysis.
4729:-- WikiProject Planet Math Exchange -- is at an all-time low. I still regularly stumble across topics where WP has no article, or a stub, while PM has a slow-to-load, hard-to-grok, but non-trivial article on the topic. It'd be nice to have
2997:. In the T.O.C., you can't tell that "semi-infinite" is a link, so I thought: Yet another of those interminable War-and-Peace-length ("semi-infinite") articles where if you somehow succeed in scrolling all the way to the bottom, it says
1473:
Irrespective of the merits of this diagram in this particular discussion, Greg you need to quit it with the Hans and Arthur never contribute anything. It is patently false and reveals _you_ to be the drama queen. Be civil, or keep quiet.
2814:
jargon. Every "semi-infite" set is infinite. A lot of people are already confused about the meaning of infinity and think that a bounded set of reals can't be infinite. This kind of ill-considered jargon only fuels the confusion.
2845:
I guess my original wording about lack of "no single formal definition" was bad: I meant that it had multiple definitions, not none! It's certainly a well-accepted and widely-used technical term, as a quick search on titles at
3886:
needs to be updated to reflect current practice. This wikiproject is one of the projects that signed on to this guideline in the past. If you have any comments or concerns about the guideline, please feel free to comment at
2352:
I think that most of the urgent problems have been fixed. A certain amount of this is probably in the eye of the beholder, though. If someone else wants to drop by and check out the changes, I certainly wouldn't object.
2017:
To
Geometry guy: You asked "... whether an elementary proof should be based on conceptual misunderstandings for simplicity.". Absolutely not. We should never take a falsity as a premise, unless we are explicitly doing an
4035:
are options, but the former has alignment problems and the latter looks more or less the same; except for the loading time and the other browser settings that people might have. What are your opinions on the matter?
3364:
and by the suspicion that wikipedantry helped create the climate in which some rather experienced editors resort to plagiarism because they feel V and NOR leave them no other choice, I have proposed an addition to
1815:
the equivalence class of y-y(p)1 (where 1 is the constant function, with value 1) modulo functions vanishing at p to higher order. If y=f(x) (i.e. y = f ⚬ x for some other coordinate x on the same line and some
4371:. Most of the articles that linked to it plainly did not intend the uniqueness theorem for Poisson's equation, so I left most of the links to the article intact and made the newly created redirect page titled
1514:
of formal theories and metamathematics. That ought to be clear if it is only used in articles within that field, though it might not hurt if the caption pointed it out (without the caption growing excessive).
2727:
Honestly I'm not in favor of jargon articles. If there's not a well-specified concept being described, the article should probably be deleted. (I note in passing that you missed the engineering meaning of
3807:
I was the one who changed it, for some of the reasons mentioned above. It seems to me that content on orthogonal bases is more likely to be added now that the topic has its own stub, and it also helps the
4110:
From where I'm viewing this, the teletext version looks good, in that it has serifs where the italic I does not, and is slanted like the italic I. But I don't know how much of that is browser-dependent.
3046:
tells about existence, uniqueness and usefulness, but not a hint about how to construct one, unless I'm too thick to see it. (I looked about some with Google, with no better luck.) Is it a black art?
1863:
No I am not proposing to write it that way, but why do you presume that the article should be written as the first proof to be read by those learning calculus? This is an encyclopedia, not a textbook.
2766:
No, I really don't agree. That just encourages people to link it, and it shouldn't be linked. If it's not clear, explain it inline. Explaining jargon by wikilinks is a bad idea — see the horrendous
2581:θ for the interesting differential on the unit circle. It seems worth mentioning somewhere that occasionally notation is abused and inexact differentials are sometimes written as if they are exact.
63:
3360:
I may be wrong, but I think we have something like a consensus that things that can be found in every textbook that covers an article's topic do not need inline citations. Motivated by a dispute at
2916:
If there were a separate article on semi-infinite intervals I'd consider making this a disambiguation page. If I were somewhat confident that there ought to be such an article, I'd create it.
4147:
My italic I lacks serifs, so I agree with Hardy and Night (irresistible pun intended). Perhaps font dependency could also explain why some users see no incongruence between the notations
3115:
from the article; the function you are approximating, f(x), is actually an infinite series, but you can truncate it after the x term; N(x) is the polynomial of degree m with coefficients p
3280:
1995:
I think it's done by physicists, and some of them might not even know that some people don't do it that way. I've seen an argument adduced in its favor: One might want to use the letter
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
883:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
432:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
1545:"Among the well-formed strings occur the theorems. These are defined by an axiom schema and a rule of production ... Notice, therefore, that all false additions ... are mapped into
3863:
that may be of interest to others here. The short version is, an editor wants to change the guidelines to explicitly discourage the use of references to original research papers. —
2379:
could use some work. The concept seems to be fairly general but the first sentence narrows it down to thermodynamics. Maybe written by someone who's studied only thermodynamics?
1695:
The majority of scientists either continued to say "thousand million" or changed the meaning of the
Pelletier term, milliard, from "million of millions" down to "thousand million".
3543:
3670:
4033:
3713:
I agree with the original consistency argument. Formatting display formulas in TeX is a widespread convention on
Knowledge, which indeed makes HTML used in its place look odd.—
4516:
actually mentioned U(1) in the lead (I think this is actually required by the MoS since U(1) redirects there), when mentioning U(1) this would be a good place to also link to
2205:. The two concepts are related, but they have different meanings and different formulae; a few cases of the wrong link are acceptable, but we should not do it systematically.
1999:
as a variable, while the "upright d" is still used in the formation of these differential operators. But I wouldn't mind at all getting rid of that notation in this article.
3063:
Operational Formulas of Numerical Analysis, Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 15, No. 74 (Apr., 1961), pp. 151-158. Published by: American Mathematical Society. Stable URL:
1157:
1102:
1043:
988:
933:
878:
823:
768:
713:
658:
603:
548:
493:
438:
383:
328:
273:
218:
163:
108:
25:
56:
3812:
article to not have to cover orthogonal bases as well. If the stub doesn't improve over time, then merging it back into orthonormal basis would certainly be reasonable.
2078:
I quite agree that generalizations and more advanced results should inform our treatment of elementary ones, and I think it is an excellent idea to present both proofs.
1634:
over whether the lead, or more precisely the first paragraph, should include part or all of a proof of 0.999... equalling one. Other opinions on this would be welcome.--
102:
98:
94:
90:
4169:
1451:
4090:
3993:
1691:
Apparently the following is also wrong and is apparently an incorrect and OR interpretation of what Google shows from David Eugene Smith's History of Mathematics:
4875:
21:
3888:
3860:
49:
2858:, …) (Re which, Trovatore: I was only writing up the definitions I knew; I hope someone else will document the engineering usage, if it's widely enough used.)
4682:
on how to manage the hierarchy for computer generated art/images and fractal arts, etc. will be appreciated. That topic does need help, as discussed there.
3021:
2144:. It is true that what I have quoted is not the link text; perhaps it ought to be. But some such text should be found about 95% of the time, by searching on
4689:
article goes way way back in time and seems stuck in golden ratios, etc. But there is serious and interesting mathematics used in the modern approaches to
2636:
1495:
are, and maybe most or all theorems could be formalized as such, but actual theorems are generally expressed as sequences of words in a natural language. —
4509:
You seem to actually have gotten the most relevant page for explaining what a U(1) symmetry is in physics, namely a phase rotation of the involved fields.
4368:
1346:. A formal language can be thought of as identical to the set of its well-formed formulas. The set of well-formed formulas may be broadly divided into
2931:
1706:
3883:
2709:
4624:) x {I, -I}, but globally they are different. If you make a 360° rotation, you end up on the other sheet. So SU(2) is path connected, unlike SO(3,
2179:
2141:
1811:
Well the proof is even easier than that. For any coordinate (real valued function) y on a line (e.g. the real line) and any point p, denote by dy
2708:, but it's rather out of my own areas of maths, so if anyone can give feedback or help improve it, I'd be very grateful! (Following the advice
2148:- and if you get it wrong, it doesn't matter all that much. The two terms exist because the two things are closely related, by what is called a
2109:
that need to be pointed to the correct article. I start looking into this, and then the headaches start. Could an expert help us out? Thanks, --
17:
4782:
4704:!) and I am cleaning those up now. But suggestions on the topic of "Math and modern art" which I do not know that well, will be appreciated.
2281:
2272:
2202:
2171:
2137:
1206:
1202:
1198:
2934:
about this discussion; they have have views on the proper fate of the article (disambiguation page, article, deletion, or something else).
1641:
4066:
In published mathematics, we would never use a teletext font randomly like that. On Knowledge you should use either an italic capital I (
1323:
1475:
1304:
4494:
3487:
3464:
3418:
2971:
2944:
2794:
2756:
1283:
2850:(or other cataglogues of the literature) reveals, and no more jargony than plenty of other technical concepts with several meanings (
3444:
3344:
3179:
2647:
1300:
3335:, concerning the distribution of primes, is an orphan, i.e. no other articles link to it except the list of mathematics articles.
4421:
2891:
Knowledge is not a dictionary. Mathematical articles should be written only when there's something interesting to say about the
2515:
it's clear what a "mathematical differential" in general is. There's a link, but I hesitate to be sure that it's the right one.
1980:
in upright type? Where the heck does this come from? Would anyone mind if I got rid of it? It's a typographical abomination.
1655:. The requested explanation is not required to be in the first paragraph, it's just to have one paragraph somewhere in the lead.
3149:
This is the most naive approach, and can be cumbersome if m+n is big. The article I mentioned describes an iterative approach.
2861:
A disambiguation page could make a lot of sense, since the meanings afaics seem all seem to fall into a few classes: subsets of
4349:
3284:
2298:
4545:
4182:
3527:
3450:
being applied to some articles. I'm just pointing out its availability, without comment as to whether it's appropriate. —
2360:
2069:
2051:
1849:
I hope you're not proposing to write it that way in the article, as the first proof to be read by those learning calculus!
2344:
1797:
Some typos and other matters have been fixed since I posted what you see above, so judge according to the latest version.
4428:
2427:
2305:
What do you think? (Also, I'm under the impression, unless it specifically mentions algebras, use the group article). --
2220:
2198:
4861:
4761:
4742:
4713:
4659:
4637:
4611:
4549:
4529:
4502:
4477:
from a link in "Thus, for example, the electric charge is the generator of the U(1) symmetry of electromagnetism. " on
4458:
4443:
4384:
4361:
4342:
4320:
4292:
4231:
4186:
4138:
4120:
4104:
4060:
3907:
3872:
3844:
3821:
3798:
3783:
3750:
3720:
3706:
3691:
3570:
3555:
3531:
3510:
3457:
3430:
3407:
3380:
3322:
3299:
3225:
3209:
3194:
3158:
3094:
3076:
3056:
3033:
3010:
2983:
2949:
2925:
2904:
2886:
2840:
2822:
2799:
2779:
2761:
2741:
2721:
2688:
2674:
2655:
2619:
2608:
2590:
2560:
2537:
2525:
2477:
2403:
2388:
2364:
2346:
2318:
2236:
2214:
2192:
2161:
2122:
2084:
2073:
2055:
2035:
2008:
1989:
1946:
1923:
1911:
1896:
1885:
1870:
1858:
1844:
1806:
1791:
1757:
1725:
1664:
1645:
1580:
1563:
1524:
1504:
1483:
1468:
1439:
1380:
1364:
1312:
1288:
1267:
4796:
program today, and came across a few mathematicians who seem clearly notable enough to have articles here, but don't:
3789:
On general principles, the more general concept, which is here "orthogonal basis", should have the top-level article.
3499:
1350:
and non-theorems. However, quite often, a formal system will simply define all of its well-formed formula as theorems.
1238:
4757:
4697:
4690:
3835:
under control with some strict policing, that can be harder to do with articles on 'popular' themes. such as this.
3794:
3295:
3190:
2979:
2232:
2188:
1713:
4208:, doesn't have any serifs at all. On the other hand maybe a teletype font is more legible despite its incongruity.
4126:
My italic I has serifs. It's completely font dependent. For some people the teletype font will be Courier. — Carl
3697:
I think that display formulas may be done with either html or TeX, but I personally prefer the appearance of TeX.
3276:
3258:
3246:
3232:
1835:
The chain rule is an immediate consequence. If u = g(y) then, omitting subscripts, du = g'(y)dy= g'(f(x))f'(x) dx.
4845:
4243:
3687:
3266:
2965:
2870:
1676:
1520:
1464:
1335:
4539:
4176:
3521:
2519:
Well obviously, it is a 1-form, but applied mathematics textbooks are not very helpful sources in this respect!
2354:
2063:
2045:
1217:
4857:
4571:
4396:
3868:
3739:
2338:
1500:
1273:
Please do -- it needs it. I suggest a userpage draft until you can get it as long as the current page (ish).
1479:
4498:
4439:
4380:
4316:
4116:
3732:
3340:
3318:
3006:
2921:
2604:
2473:
2384:
2268:
2004:
1854:
1802:
1787:
1308:
4833:
4709:
4837:
4778:
4679:
4599:
4282:
4050:
3454:
3332:
3262:
2940:
2790:
2752:
2615:
2533:
2521:
2442:
2129:
2102:
2080:
1919:
1892:
1866:
1840:
1614:
1540:-system in the section "Double-Entendre!" in Chapter II "Meaning and Form in Mathematics" Hofstadter says:
1436:
1279:
1254:
4487:
Instead I got the general treatment of circle groups, which is next to useless for a non-mathematician.
2661:
The two groups have very different structures and as such deserve different articles. A see also link in
4793:
4753:
4525:
4415:
3790:
3771:
3426:
3291:
3186:
3154:
3072:
3029:
2975:
2651:
2264:
2249:
2228:
2184:
1680:
1577:
1411:(In the picture caption) According to Hofstadter, "quite often" all well-formed formulas are theorems.
4705:
1449:
from each of the classes (e.g., from the inside out: "(3·3)+(4·4)=(5·5)", "(2+2)=17", "83(+)3(", and "
4797:
4490:
3728:
3683:
3628:
3479:
3468:
3377:
3374:
3107:
It's really just polynomial multiplication: D(x) is the polynomial of degree n with coefficients 1, q
2819:
2816:
2670:
2438:
2399:
2376:
2294:
2224:
2210:
2175:
2157:
2023:
1753:
1660:
1516:
1460:
4175:
for the same function, and others see a typographical travesty (c.f. earlier, much longer thread).
3998:
2878:
2713:
2679:
The group of rational points on the unit circle is a relatively small subgroup of the circle group.
4853:
4817:
4809:
4686:
4655:
4633:
4607:
4308:
4304:
3864:
3702:
3594:
3586:
3495:
3350:
3309:
3270:
3200:
Really I meant to urge that the article (rather than this page) should have a better explanation! —
3043:
2900:
2882:
2775:
2737:
2717:
2684:
2031:
1636:
1559:
1496:
1425:
1343:
1832:
because f(x)-f(x(p))1 differs from f'(x(p))(x-x(p)1) by a function vanishing at p to higher order.
4435:
4376:
4372:
4338:
4326:
4312:
4112:
3817:
3746:
3403:
3336:
3314:
3002:
2917:
2851:
2600:
2469:
2411:
2380:
2000:
1850:
1798:
1783:
1687:
Jacques Pelletier du Mans used the name milliard (“milliart”) for "Million de Millions", i.e. 10.
1609:
1360:
1223:
4400:
4805:
4357:
4271:
4039:
3913:
3809:
3767:
3517:
3451:
3239:
3205:
3176:
3090:
3052:
2935:
2836:
2785:
2747:
2197:
I cannot agree. The link in the dab page should be changed; but it is suboptimal to link from
1737:
1721:
1433:
1274:
3930:. I really don't like how this letter looks in this font. What about using the teletext font
2026:. Passing a falsehood off as the truth, even implicitly, is lying and will harm the readers.
1573:— they are inappropriate, counterproductive, unwanted here, against policy and sanctionable.
4841:
4825:
4813:
4748:
There was a licensing issue to do with the adoption of CC-by-SA here. But it does seem from
4521:
4454:
4404:
3779:
3763:
3756:
3551:
3422:
3370:
3354:
3150:
3068:
3025:
2866:
2556:
2328:
1942:
1934:
1907:
1881:
1838:
The original argument formalizes this basic idea without discussing the conceptual meaning.
1574:
1221:
1219:
39:
4268:
laptop. Interestingly; the font in the edit window is identical on both operating systems.
4829:
4738:
4643:
4150:
3840:
3717:
3242:
2666:
2464:
exists. I'd modify the sentence if I were sure what genus the concept should belong to.
2395:
2206:
2153:
1749:
1702:
1656:
1491:
I don't think it's true in practice that all theorems are well formed formulas. Maybe all
1331:
1327:
4792:
In case someone here is looking for something to do: I was browsing the web site for the
3861:
Knowledge talk:Scientific citation guidelines#Bringing this guideline in line with policy
2746:
Actually, if there's no well-defined meaning the page should probably become a dab page.
4073:
3136:. In general there will be a unique solution, unless the system happens to be singular.
2128:
If the linking article talks about adjoint representations of a group - any group - (as
4730:
4726:
4719:
4651:
4629:
4603:
4587:
4559:
4227:
3960:
3698:
3582:
3566:
3483:
3221:
2896:
2771:
2767:
2733:
2680:
2586:
2316:
2120:
2027:
1985:
1745:
1555:
1492:
1376:
1263:
4869:
4801:
4517:
4334:
4265:
4261:
4133:
4099:
3902:
3813:
3742:
3679:
3399:
3250:
2705:
2697:
2098:
1652:
1631:
1356:
3001:
Usually I just delete the "stub" tag. But I guess that's not what it is this time.
2140:; if the linking article talks about adjoint representations of an algebra, link to
4849:
4513:
4353:
3201:
3086:
3048:
2832:
2662:
2643:
2394:
I have only encountered inexact differentials in thermodynamics. Any other example?
2277:
2253:
1741:
1717:
1456:
3419:
Knowledge:Village pump (technical)#On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences links
1748:
should describe their applicability to improper integrals in addition to series.--
2271:, which is "an element of the Lie algebra associated to a Lie group", so link to
4821:
4450:
3775:
3547:
3366:
2862:
2552:
2424:
2286:
2257:
1938:
1930:
1903:
1877:
1598:
1510:
The diagram should not be taken as more than clarifying how the words are used
1322:
4734:
4701:
4680:
Talk:Fractal_landscape#Fractal_images.2C_art.2C_landscapes.2C_surfaces.2C_etc.
4257:
4201:
3882:(Just a courtesy note.) There has been some discussion recently about whether
3836:
3714:
3395:
3254:
3085:
Does "Compute f(x)D(x)–N(x) to order m+n in x" mean compute m+n derivatives? —
2170:
Actually you should get rid of it as flawed (only two links out), redirect to
1770:
1698:
1626:
Disagreement on whether to include coverage of a proof in the lead at 0.999...
4223:
4205:
3590:
3562:
3361:
3217:
2582:
2306:
2110:
1981:
1372:
1259:
3169:
A nice algebraic/symbolic account occurs in Chapter 5.9 (2nd ed.) of this:
2831:
Perhaps it should just redirect to the article about semi-boneless hams. —
1782:? (In my view, this rewrite gives a clearer way of explaining the proof.)
1890:
Should we assume the same level of knowledge throughout a single article?
1421:
Finally, in what articles do you think it appropriate? I would say that,
4769:
4563:
4129:
4095:
3898:
1339:
1326:
This diagram shows the syntactic entities which may be constructed from
2855:
2149:
1824:) then the definition of differentiability of f at x(p) ensures that dy
1429:
1347:
4602:, and there is no simple generalisation of them to higher dimensions.
3064:
1554:
This does not seem to agree with your claim about Hofstadter's views.
4749:
3394:? Has it been discontinued? I have started a discussion on this at
2465:
2332:
understanding of polynomials does not extend far beyond high school.
4478:
1414:
As far as I can tell, Hofstadter is the only one who believes that,
4693:
and should probably be discussed in a more mathematical setting.
3919:
I was thinking about the formatting we use for the capital letter
3391:
1321:
1740:
doesn't mention the method of determining convergence. Besides,
4352:
on the uniqueness of the solution to a differential equation. —
3516:
I don't think a separate stub is appropriate, rather a link to
2810:
I generally agree with Trovatore about this. Moreover, this is
2646:
or what? (I didn't know about circle group article till later.)
1736:
It seems to me that no such articles exist as of now, at least
4470:
4256:
are indistinguishable! :-( They're both just a straight line,
1224:
33:
3740:
Talk:Symbolic computation#Merger with computer algebra system
3490:, or by formatting your dab section some other way. Thanks.
1393:
the diagram is accurate, then what it says is the following:
4246:
which is a Linux based operating system, and the teletext
1403:
finitary languages, but we'll let that go, for the moment.
4700:
class of articles even had source code in them (e.g. see
3920:
1547:
strings which are well formed, but which are not theorems
3589:) about the markup of mathematical standalone formulas.
3504:
2847:
2784:
Of course people shouldn't like dab articles at all...
2333:
2106:
1779:
4002:
3287:) of mathematicians would be especially helpful now.
2223:
falls under those I was suggesting should be piped to
4204:
font and the rest of the text, which I believe is in
4153:
4076:
4001:
3963:
3631:
3544:
Knowledge:Featured picture candidates/Maze Generation
1968:
What concerns me more than the proof is the hideous d
3542:
A math related image has been nominated for FP. See
4474:
3585:we have a discussion (prolonging a previous one at
2101:project, we've come across the disambiguation page
1396:All well-formed formulas are "strings of symbols".
4222:become irrelevant or unsightly on newer software.
4163:
4084:
4027:
3987:
3664:
2417:...could use some work. It now starts like this:
2174:which has more cases, and have a hatnote there to
4670:Mathematical art & computer generated imagery
4582:). It so happens that U(1) is isomorphic to SO(2,
4465:Need an easier way into some of these maths pages
1671:incorrect claim for Pelletier's use of "milliard"
1653:Talk:0.999...#RfC:_coverage_of_proofs_in_the_lead
2993:The T.O.C. of this page listed a section titled
2486:Something like this would work (but see below):
4449:This appeared as a question on the help desk.--
4159:
2134:adjoint representation of the SU(3) gauge group
1543:
4399:'s “regions of equal area” in 1842 theorem to
3597:make it a point that standalone formulas like
2280:is a physics article that talks about groups;
3889:Knowledge talk:Scientific citation guidelines
1232:This page has archives. Sections older than
57:
8:
3022:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sacks spiral
2577:I suppose this is sort of like the notation
1615:Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid
4620:To Gandalf61: SU(2) locally resembles SO(3,
3417:The OEIS interwiki prefix has been broken:
2637:Group of rational points on the unit circle
2492:"A mathematical differential is said to be
2152:, and the two articles link to each other.
1670:
4484:U(1) is circular, U(2) is spherical, etc.
2297:and linking intentionally to the dab page
64:
50:
4481:. I was expecting to see something like
4369:uniqueness theorem for Poisson's equation
4152:
4075:
4000:
3962:
3855:Scientific citation guidelines discussion
3636:
3630:
2932:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Disambiguation
2248:Hurm. So, I'm looking at a few of these:
1769:Useful link relevant to this discussion:
4479:http://en.wikipedia.org/Charge_(physics)
3884:Knowledge:Scientific citation guidelines
3878:Knowledge:Scientific citation guidelines
3621:have to be formatted using <math: -->
3283:. The additional suggestions (including
3171:von zur Gathen, J.; Gerhard, J. (2003),
2293:algebras, so I was thinking of invoking
2260:. I'm thinking it should go like this:
2219:But that was not what I was suggesting:
4512:That being said, it would be useful if
4157:
4080:
3660:
3371:WT:V#When a reliable source is required
2299:Adjoint representation (disambiguation)
2180:Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra
2142:adjoint representation of a Lie algebra
1732:Convergence test for improper integrals
1591:
1432:, and I have doubts about "theorem". —
1408:All theorems are well-formed formulas.
88:
3249:concerns the approximate convexity of
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics
4876:WikiProject Mathematics archives/2010
4788:A few missing Canadian mathematicians
4598:) x {I, -I}. These relationships are
2282:Adjoint representation of a Lie group
2273:Adjoint representation of a Lie group
2203:Adjoint representation of a Lie group
2172:Adjoint representation of a Lie group
2138:adjoint representation of a Lie group
7:
4642:I should also say that SU(2) is the
4471:http://en.wikipedia.org/Circle_group
3520:at the new dab page is preferable.
3216:of order more than about 15 myself.
1632:Talk:0.999...#Refining the paragraph
4767:
3281:substantial (Knowledge) peer-review
3065:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2004221
2642:Should this article be merged with
4429:Composite Number Factoring Theorem
4375:into a stub article. Work on it.
3941:. Which do you think looks better
3488:class representative (mathematics)
3465:class representative (mathematics)
3016:Article for deletion: Sacks spiral
2972:Mathematics Subject Classification
1712:This is probably best taken up at
1531:Greg - I would like to know where
1303:has been requested to be renamed.
45:WikiProject Mathematics archives (
32:
4750:http://planetmath.org/?op=license
3478:I'm a law student, and I created
3436:Template:Infobox integer sequence
2895:, not merely to define a term. --
2500:for some differentiable function
1976:notation. Why would you put the
1301:Negative and non-negative numbers
1295:Negative and non-negative numbers
1236:may be automatically archived by
4594:) i.e. it is isomorphic to SO(3,
4260:I think they call it. I'm using
3936:instead? You get this by typing
3665:{\displaystyle \log _{b}(x)=y\,}
1937:) 03:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)--
1450:
1249:Analytic number theory spruce up
38:
4028:{\displaystyle \scriptstyle I=}
3390:Does anyone know the status of
3020:Some discussion is going on at
2989:Yet another semi-infinite stub?
2099:disambiguation pages with links
4752:that that was only temporary.
4560:group of rotational symmetries
4405:
4021:
4009:
3982:
3970:
3673:\log_b(x) = y \,</math: -->
3651:
3645:
3175:, Cambridge University Press,
1917:questions are easy to answer!
1:
4862:08:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
4783:22:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
4776:...would be helpful. Thanks,
4762:06:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
4743:04:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
4714:03:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
4660:15:17, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4638:14:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4612:12:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4550:13:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4530:11:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4503:01:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
4459:20:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
4444:00:48, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
4422:07:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
4385:06:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
4362:03:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
4343:02:00, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
4321:04:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
4293:12:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
4232:01:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
4187:00:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
4139:00:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
4121:00:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
4105:23:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
4061:23:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
3908:18:56, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
3873:20:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
3845:03:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
3822:22:11, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
3799:09:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
3784:08:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
3751:14:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
3721:10:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
3707:00:53, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
3692:20:55, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
3571:01:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
3556:04:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
3532:22:19, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
3511:21:49, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
3458:18:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
3431:22:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
3408:17:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
3381:16:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
3345:05:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
3323:16:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
3300:19:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
3226:13:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
3210:03:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
3195:22:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
3159:23:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
3095:22:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
3077:20:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
3057:16:21, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
2704:I've just created a stub for
1318:Diagram of syntactic entities
4475:http://en.wikipedia.org/U(1)
4264:like I was last night on my
3034:15:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
3011:20:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2995:"Semi-infinite stub created"
2984:16:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2950:20:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2926:20:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2905:19:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2887:17:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2869:, and the kind occurring in
2841:16:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2823:11:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2800:14:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2780:04:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2762:04:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2742:18:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
2722:16:16, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
2689:21:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
2675:18:43, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
2656:16:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
2620:22:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2609:20:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2591:12:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2561:21:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
2538:00:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
2526:00:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
2478:00:07, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
2404:02:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
2389:00:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
2365:16:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
2347:13:47, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
2319:01:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
2237:09:13, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
2221:universal enveloping algebra
2215:15:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
2199:Universal enveloping algebra
2193:15:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
2162:14:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
2123:13:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
2093:Help! Adjoint representation
2085:00:31, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
2074:11:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
2056:10:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
2036:08:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
2009:16:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1990:11:32, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1947:03:45, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
1924:23:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1912:23:47, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1897:23:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1886:23:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1871:22:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1859:16:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1845:00:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1807:04:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1792:03:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1758:11:40, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1726:22:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
1707:21:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
1665:12:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1646:12:22, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1581:11:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1564:18:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
1525:14:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
1505:02:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
1484:22:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
1469:01:50, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
1440:21:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
1381:21:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
1365:21:10, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
1338:may be broadly divided into
1313:04:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1289:00:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
1268:11:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
1253:I'd really like to make the
3923:to denote an interval; say
4892:
4733:get functioning again ...
4698:computer generated imagery
4691:computer generated imagery
4558:In higher dimensions, the
4434:Just "original research"?
4242:I've just logged on using
3327:
2062:section, I should think.
1714:Talk:Long and short scales
4846:Nicole Tomczak-Jaegermann
4768:A statistician's view on
4070:) or put it in math mode
3615:(typed as log<sub: -->
3463:Please create a stub for
2999:"This article is a stub."
2966:semi-infinite programming
2955:Semi-infinite programming
2871:semi-infinite programming
1679:, the following claim in
1677:Jacques Pelletier du Mans
1571:stop the personal insults
1512:within the specific field
4725:I note that activity on
4572:special orthogonal group
3859:There's a discussion at
3672:(typed as <math: -->
3561:Withdrawn by nominator.
3445:Infobox integer sequence
2828:bizarre term "biunique".
2441:, if the differentiable
2437:, as contrasted with an
4678:experts here? Ideas on
4600:accidental isomorphisms
4389:
4350:Picard–Lindelöf theorem
3733:Computer algebra system
3678:Their main argument is
3502:/ how the subject page
3173:Modern Computer Algebra
2289:deals with both groups
2269:Infinitesimal generator
1763:Proof of the chain rule
4165:
4086:
4029:
3989:
3772:orthogonal polynomials
3666:
3290:Thanks! Best regards,
3263:mathematical economics
2456:But you can't call it
2334:These were my changes.
2130:quantum chromodynamics
2103:Adjoint representation
1630:There is a dispute at
1551:
1351:
1255:analytic number theory
1239:Lowercase sigmabot III
4834:Christophe Reutenauer
4794:Canada Research Chair
4674:Hi, any mathematical
4299:"Residue on infinity"
4166:
4164:{\displaystyle f\,\!}
4087:
4030:
3990:
3667:
3508:when I made this edit
3467:, or somehow fix the
3333:Opperman's conjecture
3328:Opperman's conjecture
3259:Shapley–Folkman lemma
3247:Shapley–Folkman lemma
3233:Shapley–Folkman lemma
2599:exact in such cases?
2496:if it is of the form
2267:is a reference to an
2265:Special unitary group
2250:Special unitary group
1681:Long and short scales
1599:Dictionary Definition
1325:
4838:Alexander Shnirelman
4586:), and SU(2) is the
4151:
4074:
3999:
3961:
3729:Symbolic computation
3629:
3480:class representative
3469:class representative
2960:Mathematical Reviews
2665:seems appropriate.--
2439:inexact differential
2377:Inexact differential
2371:Inexact differential
2225:adjoint endomorphism
2176:adjoint endomorphism
2024:reductio ad absurdum
1344:well-formed formulas
4687:Mathematics and art
4309:Residue at infinity
4305:Residue on infinity
4085:{\displaystyle I\,}
3587:talk:complex number
3471:disambiguation page
3310:Chebyshev cube root
3305:Chebyshev cube root
2375:The article titled
2340:Anonymous Dissident
1426:well-formed formula
4570:), it is the real
4373:uniqueness theorem
4327:Uniqueness theorem
4161:
4160:
4158:
4082:
4081:
4025:
4024:
3988:{\displaystyle I=}
3985:
3662:
3661:
3616:''b''</sub: -->
3413:OEIS prefix broken
3285:article assessment
2974:(MSC2010). Thanks
2412:Exact differential
2343:
1610:Douglas Hofstadter
1352:
1336:strings of symbols
4806:George A. Elliott
4493:comment added by
4473:as a redirect of
4137:
4103:
3906:
3810:orthonormal basis
3768:Orthonormal basis
3766:from a redirect (
3577:Formatting issues
3546:for discussion.--
3518:equivalence class
3509:
3482:as a redirect to
2948:
2798:
2760:
2595:Are they usually
2337:
2324:Partial fractions
2213:
2160:
1738:improper integral
1639:
1399:In fact, only in
1287:
1246:
1245:
95:Nov 2002–Dec 2003
4883:
4842:Stevo Todorcevic
4826:Sujatha Ramdorai
4818:François Lalonde
4814:Stephen S. Kudla
4754:Charles Matthews
4542:
4505:
4418:
4411:
4407:
4401:Jacobi's theorem
4395:Can anybody add
4390:Jacobi's theorem
4291:
4290:
4287:
4286:
4278:
4179:
4170:
4168:
4167:
4162:
4127:
4093:
4091:
4089:
4088:
4083:
4059:
4058:
4055:
4054:
4046:
4034:
4032:
4031:
4026:
3994:
3992:
3991:
3986:
3956:
3947:
3929:
3896:
3791:Charles Matthews
3764:Orthogonal basis
3762:Someone changed
3757:Orthogonal basis
3671:
3669:
3668:
3663:
3641:
3640:
3622:markup, such as
3617:(''x'') = ''y'')
3524:
3507:
3494:
3449:
3443:
3292:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
3187:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
3185:. Best regards,
3184:
3044:Padé approximant
3039:Padé approximant
2976:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
2970:as 90C34 in its
2938:
2867:Euclidean spaces
2788:
2750:
2357:
2341:
2329:Partial fraction
2313:
2310:
2229:Charles Matthews
2209:
2185:Charles Matthews
2156:
2117:
2114:
2097:Hi, over at the
2066:
2048:
1635:
1619:
1607:
1601:
1596:
1454:
1328:formal languages
1277:
1241:
1225:
66:
59:
52:
42:
34:
4891:
4890:
4886:
4885:
4884:
4882:
4881:
4880:
4866:
4865:
4830:Thomas Ransford
4798:Nantel Bergeron
4790:
4774:
4723:
4672:
4644:universal cover
4540:
4488:
4467:
4432:
4420:
4416:
4409:
4392:
4330:
4301:
4284:
4283:
4280:
4272:
4269:
4252:and the italic
4177:
4149:
4148:
4072:
4071:
4052:
4051:
4048:
4040:
4037:
3997:
3996:
3959:
3958:
3949:
3942:
3924:
3917:
3880:
3857:
3760:
3736:
3684:Jakob.scholbach
3632:
3627:
3626:
3606:
3579:
3540:
3522:
3503:
3473:
3447:
3441:
3438:
3415:
3388:
3358:
3330:
3307:
3279:has received a
3255:non-convex sets
3243:convex geometry
3236:
3182:
3170:
3135:
3131:
3126:
3122:
3118:
3114:
3110:
3041:
3018:
2991:
2957:
2930:I have alerted
2702:
2640:
2415:
2373:
2355:
2339:
2326:
2311:
2308:
2207:Septentrionalis
2178:which is where
2154:Septentrionalis
2115:
2112:
2095:
2064:
2046:
2022:calculation or
1831:
1827:
1814:
1765:
1734:
1673:
1644:
1628:
1623:
1622:
1608:
1604:
1597:
1593:
1588:
1549:." (my italics)
1517:Henning Makholm
1493:formal theorems
1461:Henning Makholm
1320:
1297:
1251:
1237:
1226:
1220:
1211:
1097:
87:
86:
73:
70:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
4889:
4887:
4879:
4878:
4868:
4867:
4854:David Eppstein
4789:
4786:
4773:
4766:
4765:
4764:
4722:
4717:
4671:
4668:
4667:
4666:
4665:
4664:
4663:
4662:
4615:
4614:
4555:
4554:
4553:
4552:
4541:Sławomir Biały
4533:
4532:
4510:
4466:
4463:
4462:
4461:
4431:
4426:
4425:
4424:
4414:
4391:
4388:
4367:I moved it to
4365:
4364:
4329:
4324:
4300:
4297:
4296:
4295:
4251:
4239:
4238:
4237:
4236:
4235:
4234:
4214:
4213:
4212:
4211:
4210:
4209:
4192:
4191:
4190:
4189:
4178:Sławomir Biały
4156:
4142:
4141:
4108:
4107:
4079:
4023:
4020:
4017:
4014:
4011:
4008:
4005:
3984:
3981:
3978:
3975:
3972:
3969:
3966:
3957:? I know that
3953:
3940:
3934:
3916:
3911:
3879:
3876:
3865:David Eppstein
3856:
3853:
3852:
3851:
3850:
3849:
3848:
3847:
3827:
3826:
3825:
3824:
3802:
3801:
3759:
3754:
3735:
3725:
3724:
3723:
3710:
3709:
3676:
3675:
3659:
3656:
3653:
3650:
3647:
3644:
3639:
3635:
3619:
3618:
3602:
3595:JohnBlackburne
3583:talk:Logarithm
3578:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3539:
3536:
3535:
3534:
3523:Sławomir Biały
3484:lead plaintiff
3472:
3461:
3437:
3434:
3414:
3411:
3387:
3384:
3357:
3348:
3329:
3326:
3306:
3303:
3251:Minkowski sums
3235:
3230:
3229:
3228:
3198:
3197:
3180:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3142:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3137:
3133:
3129:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3108:
3100:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3080:
3079:
3040:
3037:
3017:
3014:
2990:
2987:
2956:
2953:
2914:
2913:
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2907:
2874:
2859:
2829:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2768:if and only if
2730:semi-inifinite
2701:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2639:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2510:
2509:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2484:
2483:
2454:
2453:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2433:is said to be
2414:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2372:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2356:Sławomir Biały
2325:
2322:
2303:
2302:
2284:
2275:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2165:
2164:
2094:
2091:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2065:Sławomir Biały
2047:Sławomir Biały
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2012:
2011:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1836:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1812:
1776:
1775:
1764:
1761:
1746:Dirichlet test
1733:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1640:
1637:JohnBlackburne
1627:
1624:
1621:
1620:
1602:
1590:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1567:
1566:
1552:
1541:
1528:
1527:
1497:David Eppstein
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1412:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1319:
1316:
1296:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1154:
1098:
1096:
1095:
1040:
985:
930:
875:
820:
765:
710:
655:
600:
545:
490:
435:
380:
325:
270:
215:
160:
105:
84:
83:
82:
79:
78:
75:
74:
69:
68:
61:
54:
46:
43:
37:
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4888:
4877:
4874:
4873:
4871:
4864:
4863:
4859:
4855:
4851:
4847:
4843:
4839:
4835:
4831:
4827:
4823:
4819:
4815:
4811:
4810:J. F. Jardine
4807:
4803:
4802:David Brydges
4799:
4795:
4787:
4785:
4784:
4781:
4780:
4771:
4763:
4759:
4755:
4751:
4747:
4746:
4745:
4744:
4740:
4736:
4732:
4728:
4721:
4718:
4716:
4715:
4711:
4707:
4703:
4699:
4694:
4692:
4688:
4683:
4681:
4677:
4669:
4661:
4657:
4653:
4649:
4645:
4641:
4640:
4639:
4635:
4631:
4628:) x {I, -I}.
4627:
4623:
4619:
4618:
4617:
4616:
4613:
4609:
4605:
4601:
4597:
4593:
4589:
4585:
4581:
4577:
4573:
4569:
4565:
4561:
4557:
4556:
4551:
4547:
4543:
4537:
4536:
4535:
4534:
4531:
4527:
4523:
4519:
4518:unitary group
4515:
4511:
4508:
4507:
4506:
4504:
4500:
4496:
4492:
4485:
4482:
4480:
4476:
4472:
4464:
4460:
4456:
4452:
4448:
4447:
4446:
4445:
4441:
4437:
4436:Michael Hardy
4430:
4427:
4423:
4419:
4413:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4393:
4387:
4386:
4382:
4378:
4377:Michael Hardy
4374:
4370:
4363:
4359:
4355:
4351:
4347:
4346:
4345:
4344:
4340:
4336:
4328:
4325:
4323:
4322:
4318:
4314:
4313:Michael Hardy
4310:
4306:
4298:
4294:
4288:
4279:
4277:
4276:
4267:
4263:
4262:Google Chrome
4259:
4255:
4250:
4247:
4245:
4241:
4240:
4233:
4229:
4225:
4220:
4219:
4218:
4217:
4216:
4215:
4207:
4203:
4198:
4197:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4188:
4184:
4180:
4174:
4154:
4146:
4145:
4144:
4143:
4140:
4135:
4131:
4125:
4124:
4123:
4122:
4118:
4114:
4113:Michael Hardy
4106:
4101:
4097:
4077:
4069:
4065:
4064:
4063:
4062:
4056:
4047:
4045:
4044:
4018:
4015:
4012:
4006:
4003:
3979:
3976:
3973:
3967:
3964:
3954:
3951:
3945:
3939:I</tt: -->
3937:
3935:
3932:
3927:
3922:
3915:
3912:
3910:
3909:
3904:
3900:
3892:
3890:
3885:
3877:
3875:
3874:
3870:
3866:
3862:
3854:
3846:
3842:
3838:
3833:
3832:
3831:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3823:
3819:
3815:
3811:
3806:
3805:
3804:
3803:
3800:
3796:
3792:
3788:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3781:
3777:
3773:
3769:
3765:
3758:
3755:
3753:
3752:
3748:
3744:
3741:
3734:
3730:
3726:
3722:
3719:
3716:
3712:
3711:
3708:
3704:
3700:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3689:
3685:
3681:
3657:
3654:
3648:
3642:
3637:
3633:
3625:
3624:
3623:
3614:
3610:
3605:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3596:
3592:
3588:
3584:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3564:
3560:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3553:
3549:
3545:
3537:
3533:
3529:
3525:
3519:
3515:
3514:
3513:
3512:
3506:
3501:
3497:
3491:
3489:
3485:
3481:
3476:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3460:
3459:
3456:
3453:
3446:
3435:
3433:
3432:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3412:
3410:
3409:
3405:
3401:
3397:
3393:
3385:
3383:
3382:
3379:
3376:
3372:
3368:
3363:
3356:
3352:
3349:
3347:
3346:
3342:
3338:
3337:Michael Hardy
3334:
3325:
3324:
3320:
3316:
3315:Michael Hardy
3311:
3304:
3302:
3301:
3297:
3293:
3288:
3286:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3272:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3241:
3240:combinatorial
3234:
3231:
3227:
3223:
3219:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3211:
3207:
3203:
3196:
3192:
3188:
3183:
3181:0-521-82646-2
3178:
3174:
3168:
3167:
3160:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3096:
3092:
3088:
3084:
3083:
3082:
3081:
3078:
3074:
3070:
3066:
3061:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3045:
3038:
3036:
3035:
3031:
3027:
3023:
3015:
3013:
3012:
3008:
3004:
3003:Michael Hardy
3000:
2996:
2988:
2986:
2985:
2981:
2977:
2973:
2969:
2967:
2961:
2954:
2952:
2951:
2946:
2942:
2937:
2933:
2928:
2927:
2923:
2919:
2918:Michael Hardy
2906:
2902:
2898:
2894:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2875:
2872:
2868:
2865:, subsets of
2864:
2860:
2857:
2853:
2849:
2848:www.arxiv.org
2844:
2843:
2842:
2838:
2834:
2830:
2826:
2825:
2824:
2821:
2818:
2813:
2809:
2801:
2796:
2792:
2787:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2758:
2754:
2749:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2719:
2715:
2711:
2707:
2706:semi-infinite
2699:
2698:Semi-infinite
2696:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2678:
2677:
2676:
2672:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2645:
2638:
2635:
2621:
2618:
2617:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2601:Michael Hardy
2598:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2571:
2570:
2569:
2562:
2558:
2554:
2549:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2545:
2544:
2539:
2536:
2535:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2524:
2523:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2514:
2508:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2482:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2470:Michael Hardy
2467:
2463:
2459:
2452:
2447:
2444:
2440:
2436:
2432:
2429:
2426:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2418:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2390:
2386:
2382:
2381:Michael Hardy
2378:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2345:
2342:
2335:
2330:
2323:
2321:
2320:
2317:
2315:
2314:
2300:
2296:
2295:WP:INTDABLINK
2292:
2288:
2285:
2283:
2279:
2276:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2121:
2119:
2118:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2092:
2086:
2083:
2082:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2016:
2015:
2014:
2013:
2010:
2006:
2002:
2001:Michael Hardy
1998:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1922:
1921:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1895:
1894:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1869:
1868:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1851:Michael Hardy
1848:
1847:
1846:
1843:
1842:
1837:
1834:
1828:= f'(x(p)) dx
1823:
1819:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1799:Michael Hardy
1796:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:Michael Hardy
1781:
1774:
1772:
1767:
1766:
1762:
1760:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1689:
1688:
1684:
1682:
1678:
1675:According to
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1638:
1633:
1625:
1617:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1603:
1600:
1595:
1592:
1585:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1548:
1542:
1539:
1534:
1530:
1529:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1513:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1476:71.233.148.24
1472:
1471:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1453:
1447:
1446:
1441:
1438:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1413:
1410:
1409:
1407:
1402:
1398:
1397:
1395:
1394:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1324:
1317:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1305:76.66.203.138
1302:
1294:
1290:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1256:
1248:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1215:
1214:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
986:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:
931:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
876:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
821:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
766:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
711:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
656:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
605:
601:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
495:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
436:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
161:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
106:
104:
100:
96:
92:
89:
85:Earlier years
81:
80:
77:
76:
72:
67:
62:
60:
55:
53:
48:
47:
41:
36:
35:
27:
23:
19:
4850:Nick Wormald
4791:
4779:Geometry guy
4777:
4775:
4724:
4695:
4684:
4675:
4673:
4647:
4625:
4621:
4595:
4591:
4588:double cover
4583:
4579:
4575:
4567:
4514:circle group
4495:202.63.53.14
4486:
4483:
4468:
4433:
4366:
4354:Mark Dominus
4331:
4307:be moved to
4302:
4275:Fly by Night
4274:
4273:
4253:
4248:
4172:
4109:
4067:
4043:Fly by Night
4042:
4041:
3950:
3943:
3931:
3925:
3918:
3893:
3881:
3858:
3761:
3737:
3677:
3620:
3612:
3608:
3603:
3580:
3541:
3538:FP candidate
3492:
3477:
3474:
3452:Arthur Rubin
3439:
3416:
3389:
3359:
3351:WP:CHALLENGE
3331:
3308:
3289:
3275:
3267:optimization
3237:
3199:
3172:
3042:
3019:
2998:
2994:
2992:
2963:
2959:
2958:
2936:CRGreathouse
2929:
2915:
2892:
2863:total orders
2833:Mark Dominus
2811:
2786:CRGreathouse
2748:CRGreathouse
2729:
2703:
2700:stub created
2663:Circle group
2644:Circle group
2641:
2616:Geometry guy
2614:
2596:
2578:
2534:Geometry guy
2532:
2522:Geometry guy
2520:
2512:
2511:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2485:
2461:
2457:
2455:
2445:
2434:
2430:
2428:differential
2425:mathematical
2416:
2410:...and also
2374:
2327:
2307:
2304:
2290:
2278:Color charge
2254:Color charge
2247:
2145:
2133:
2132:talks about
2111:
2096:
2081:Geometry guy
2079:
2042:
2019:
1996:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1967:
1920:Geometry guy
1918:
1893:Geometry guy
1891:
1867:Geometry guy
1865:
1841:Geometry guy
1839:
1821:
1817:
1778:Opinions of
1777:
1768:
1735:
1718:Mark Dominus
1694:
1693:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1674:
1629:
1613:
1605:
1594:
1570:
1568:
1546:
1544:
1537:
1532:
1511:
1490:
1457:inconsistent
1434:Arthur Rubin
1422:
1400:
1390:
1386:
1385:(ec) What's
1353:
1298:
1275:CRGreathouse
1252:
1233:
1156:
1101:
1042:
987:
932:
877:
822:
767:
712:
657:
602:
547:
492:
437:
428:
382:
327:
272:
217:
162:
107:
103:Sep–Dec 2004
99:Jan–Aug 2004
44:
4822:Bojan Mohar
4706:History2007
4522:TimothyRias
4489:—Preceding
4397:Carl Jacobi
3938:<tt: -->
3423:PrimeHunter
3277:The article
3271:probability
3261:is used in
3151:Will Orrick
3069:Will Orrick
3026:Will Orrick
2962:classifies
2893:mathematics
2648:24.7.28.186
2287:Root system
2258:Root system
2020:approximate
1742:Abel's test
1575:Paul August
1389:about it.
4702:Orbit trap
4676:modern art
4258:sans-serif
4202:slab serif
3914:WP:MOSMATH
3727:Merger of
3440:I noticed
3396:Talk:MuPAD
2396:Netheril96
2211:PMAnderson
2158:PMAnderson
2136:) link to
1902:subject.--
1771:Chain rule
1750:Netheril96
1683:is wrong:
1657:Diego Moya
1618:1979 p. 71
1586:References
1459:system). –
91:Motivation
4652:JRSpriggs
4630:JRSpriggs
4604:Gandalf61
4566:is not U(
4469:I got to
4206:Helvetica
3699:JRSpriggs
3362:logarithm
3355:WP:BURDEN
2897:Trovatore
2879:Pit-trout
2772:Trovatore
2734:Trovatore
2714:Pit-trout
2681:JRSpriggs
2551:dS=dQ/T.
2468:, maybe?
2460:, unless
2028:JRSpriggs
1780:this edit
1651:See also
1556:Gandalf61
1357:Greg Bard
4870:Category
4770:Z-factor
4646:of SO(3,
4590:of SO(3,
4564:n-sphere
4491:unsigned
4335:Jim.belk
3814:Jim.belk
3743:Yaris678
3496:AGradman
3400:Yaris678
3123:, ..., p
3111:, ..., q
2513:provided
2443:function
2107:67 links
1348:theorems
1340:nonsense
24: |
20: |
4731:WP:PMEX
4727:WP:PMEX
4720:WP:PMEX
4303:Should
3475:Hello,
3202:Tamfang
3087:Tamfang
3049:Tamfang
2856:bounded
2597:locally
2466:1-forms
2448:exists.
2150:functor
2146:adjoint
2105:, with
1569:Greg —
1533:exactly
1430:theorem
1423:at most
1332:symbols
1234:15 days
22:Archive
4848:, and
4562:of an
4538:Done.
4451:RDBury
4410:Yú Hǎi
4244:Ubuntu
3776:RDBury
3680:WP:MOS
3548:RDBury
3505:looked
3455:(talk)
3369:. See
3269:, and
3257:; the
3245:, the
2553:Arcfrk
2256:, and
1939:Kmhkmh
1931:Kmhkmh
1904:Kmhkmh
1878:Kmhkmh
1437:(talk)
1330:. The
4735:linas
4266:Vista
3837:linas
3731:with
3392:MuPAD
3386:MuPAD
3378:Adler
3273:.
3132:and q
2820:Adler
2732:.) --
2712:. ☻)
2667:Salix
2494:exact
2435:exact
1699:Espoo
1642:deeds
1299:FYI,
16:<
4858:talk
4758:talk
4739:talk
4710:talk
4696:The
4685:The
4656:talk
4634:talk
4608:talk
4546:talk
4526:talk
4499:talk
4455:talk
4440:talk
4403:? ––
4381:talk
4358:talk
4348:The
4339:talk
4317:talk
4285:talk
4228:talk
4224:Ozob
4183:talk
4171:and
4134:talk
4117:talk
4100:talk
4053:talk
3995:and
3903:talk
3869:talk
3841:talk
3818:talk
3795:talk
3780:talk
3747:talk
3738:See
3715:Emil
3703:talk
3688:talk
3611:) =
3593:and
3591:DVdm
3567:talk
3563:Ozob
3552:talk
3528:talk
3500:talk
3427:talk
3404:talk
3375:Hans
3367:WP:V
3353:and
3341:talk
3319:talk
3296:talk
3222:talk
3218:Dmcq
3206:talk
3191:talk
3177:ISBN
3155:talk
3091:talk
3073:talk
3053:talk
3030:talk
3007:talk
2980:talk
2922:talk
2901:talk
2883:talk
2852:open
2837:talk
2817:Hans
2776:talk
2770:. --
2738:talk
2718:talk
2710:here
2685:talk
2671:talk
2652:talk
2605:talk
2587:talk
2583:Ozob
2557:talk
2474:talk
2400:talk
2385:talk
2361:talk
2233:talk
2189:talk
2070:talk
2052:talk
2032:talk
2005:talk
1986:talk
1982:Ozob
1943:talk
1935:talk
1908:talk
1882:talk
1855:talk
1803:talk
1788:talk
1754:talk
1722:talk
1703:talk
1661:talk
1560:talk
1521:talk
1501:talk
1480:talk
1465:talk
1428:and
1401:some
1387:good
1377:talk
1373:Dmcq
1361:talk
1342:and
1334:and
1309:talk
1264:talk
1260:Joth
1158:2024
1103:2023
1044:2022
989:2021
934:2020
879:2019
824:2018
769:2017
714:2016
659:2015
604:2014
549:2013
494:2012
439:2011
384:2010
329:2009
274:2008
219:2007
164:2006
109:2005
26:2010
4852:. —
4772:...
4650:).
4578:+1,
4574:SO(
4130:CBM
4096:CBM
3948:or
3899:CBM
3634:log
3601:log
3581:At
3398:.
3253:of
3238:In
3119:, p
2812:bad
2673:):
2291:and
2201:to
1744:or
1716:, —
1207:Dec
1203:Nov
1199:Oct
1195:Sep
1191:Aug
1187:Jul
1183:Jun
1179:May
1175:Apr
1171:Mar
1167:Feb
1163:Jan
1152:Dec
1148:Nov
1144:Oct
1140:Sep
1136:Aug
1132:Jul
1128:Jun
1124:May
1120:Apr
1116:Mar
1112:Feb
1108:Jan
1093:Dec
1089:Nov
1085:Oct
1081:Sep
1077:Aug
1073:Jul
1069:Jun
1065:May
1061:Apr
1057:Mar
1053:Feb
1049:Jan
1038:Dec
1034:Nov
1030:Oct
1026:Sep
1022:Aug
1018:Jul
1014:Jun
1010:May
1006:Apr
1002:Mar
998:Feb
994:Jan
983:Dec
979:Nov
975:Oct
971:Sep
967:Aug
963:Jul
959:Jun
955:May
951:Apr
947:Mar
943:Feb
939:Jan
928:Dec
924:Nov
920:Oct
916:Sep
912:Aug
908:Jul
904:Jun
900:May
896:Apr
892:Mar
888:Feb
884:Jan
873:Dec
869:Nov
865:Oct
861:Sep
857:Aug
853:Jul
849:Jun
845:May
841:Apr
837:Mar
833:Feb
829:Jan
818:Dec
814:Nov
810:Oct
806:Sep
802:Aug
798:Jul
794:Jun
790:May
786:Apr
782:Mar
778:Feb
774:Jan
763:Dec
759:Nov
755:Oct
751:Sep
747:Aug
743:Jul
739:Jun
735:May
731:Apr
727:Mar
723:Feb
719:Jan
708:Dec
704:Nov
700:Oct
696:Sep
692:Aug
688:Jul
684:Jun
680:May
676:Apr
672:Mar
668:Feb
664:Jan
653:Dec
649:Nov
645:Oct
641:Sep
637:Aug
633:Jul
629:Jun
625:May
621:Apr
617:Mar
613:Feb
609:Jan
598:Dec
594:Nov
590:Oct
586:Sep
582:Aug
578:Jul
574:Jun
570:May
566:Apr
562:Mar
558:Feb
554:Jan
543:Dec
539:Nov
535:Oct
531:Sep
527:Aug
523:Jul
519:Jun
515:May
511:Apr
507:Mar
503:Feb
499:Jan
488:Dec
484:Nov
480:Oct
476:Sep
472:Aug
468:Jul
464:Jun
460:May
456:Apr
452:Mar
448:Feb
444:Jan
433:Dec
429:Nov
425:Oct
421:Sep
417:Aug
413:Jul
409:Jun
405:May
401:Apr
397:Mar
393:Feb
389:Jan
378:Dec
374:Nov
370:Oct
366:Sep
362:Aug
358:Jul
354:Jun
350:May
346:Apr
342:Mar
338:Feb
334:Jan
323:Dec
319:Nov
315:Oct
311:Sep
307:Aug
303:Jul
299:Jun
295:May
291:Apr
287:Mar
283:Feb
279:Jan
268:Dec
264:Nov
260:Oct
256:Sep
252:Aug
248:Jul
244:Jun
240:May
236:Apr
232:Mar
228:Feb
224:Jan
213:Dec
209:Nov
205:Oct
201:Sep
197:Aug
193:Jul
189:Jun
185:May
181:Apr
177:Mar
173:Feb
169:Jan
158:Dec
154:Nov
150:Oct
146:Sep
142:Aug
138:Jul
134:Jun
130:May
126:Apr
122:Mar
118:Feb
114:Jan
4872::
4860:)
4844:,
4840:,
4836:,
4832:,
4828:,
4824:,
4820:,
4816:,
4812:,
4808:,
4804:,
4800:,
4760:)
4741:)
4712:)
4658:)
4636:)
4610:)
4548:)
4528:)
4501:)
4457:)
4442:)
4406:虞海
4383:)
4360:)
4341:)
4319:)
4311:?
4270:—
4230:)
4185:)
4132:·
4119:)
4098:·
4038:—
3955:=
3946:=
3928:=
3901:·
3891:.
3871:)
3843:)
3820:)
3797:)
3782:)
3749:)
3718:J.
3705:)
3690:)
3643:
3569:)
3554:)
3530:)
3498:/
3448:}}
3442:{{
3429:)
3421:.
3406:)
3373:.
3343:)
3321:)
3298:)
3265:,
3224:)
3208:)
3193:)
3157:)
3093:)
3075:)
3067:.
3055:)
3032:)
3024:.
3009:)
2982:)
2943:|
2924:)
2903:)
2885:)
2854:,
2839:)
2793:|
2778:)
2755:|
2740:)
2720:)
2687:)
2654:)
2607:)
2589:)
2559:)
2498:dQ
2476:)
2458:dQ
2431:dQ
2423:A
2402:)
2387:)
2363:)
2312:Ga
2309:Ja
2252:,
2235:)
2227:.
2191:)
2116:Ga
2113:Ja
2072:)
2054:)
2034:)
2007:)
1988:)
1972:/d
1945:)
1910:)
1884:)
1857:)
1820:→
1816:f:
1805:)
1790:)
1756:)
1724:)
1705:)
1697:--
1663:)
1612:,
1562:)
1538:pq
1523:)
1503:)
1482:)
1467:)
1391:If
1379:)
1363:)
1311:)
1282:|
1266:)
1205:·
1201:·
1197:·
1193:·
1189:·
1185:·
1181:·
1177:·
1173:·
1169:·
1165:·
1161::
1150:·
1146:·
1142:·
1138:·
1134:·
1130:·
1126:·
1122:·
1118:·
1114:·
1110:·
1106::
1091:·
1087:·
1083:·
1079:·
1075:·
1071:·
1067:·
1063:·
1059:·
1055:·
1051:·
1047::
1036:·
1032:·
1028:·
1024:·
1020:·
1016:·
1012:·
1008:·
1004:·
1000:·
996:·
992::
981:·
977:·
973:·
969:·
965:·
961:·
957:·
953:·
949:·
945:·
941:·
937::
926:·
922:·
918:·
914:·
910:·
906:·
902:·
898:·
894:·
890:·
886:·
882::
871:·
867:·
863:·
859:·
855:·
851:·
847:·
843:·
839:·
835:·
831:·
827::
816:·
812:·
808:·
804:·
800:·
796:·
792:·
788:·
784:·
780:·
776:·
772::
761:·
757:·
753:·
749:·
745:·
741:·
737:·
733:·
729:·
725:·
721:·
717::
706:·
702:·
698:·
694:·
690:·
686:·
682:·
678:·
674:·
670:·
666:·
662::
651:·
647:·
643:·
639:·
635:·
631:·
627:·
623:·
619:·
615:·
611:·
607::
596:·
592:·
588:·
584:·
580:·
576:·
572:·
568:·
564:·
560:·
556:·
552::
541:·
537:·
533:·
529:·
525:·
521:·
517:·
513:·
509:·
505:·
501:·
497::
486:·
482:·
478:·
474:·
470:·
466:·
462:·
458:·
454:·
450:·
446:·
442::
431:·
427:·
423:·
419:·
415:·
411:·
407:·
403:·
399:·
395:·
391:·
387::
376:·
372:·
368:·
364:·
360:·
356:·
352:·
348:·
344:·
340:·
336:·
332::
321:·
317:·
313:·
309:·
305:·
301:·
297:·
293:·
289:·
285:·
281:·
277::
266:·
262:·
258:·
254:·
250:·
246:·
242:·
238:·
234:·
230:·
226:·
222::
211:·
207:·
203:·
199:·
195:·
191:·
187:·
183:·
179:·
175:·
171:·
167::
156:·
152:·
148:·
144:·
140:·
136:·
132:·
128:·
124:·
120:·
116:·
112::
101:·
97:·
93:·
4856:(
4756:(
4737:(
4708:(
4654:(
4648:R
4632:(
4626:R
4622:R
4606:(
4596:R
4592:R
4584:R
4580:R
4576:n
4568:n
4544:(
4524:(
4520:.
4497:(
4453:(
4438:(
4417:✍
4412:)
4408:(
4379:(
4356:(
4337:(
4315:(
4289:)
4281:(
4254:I
4249:I
4226:(
4181:(
4173:f
4155:f
4136:)
4128:(
4115:(
4102:)
4094:(
4078:I
4068:I
4057:)
4049:(
4022:]
4019:1
4016:,
4013:0
4010:[
4007:=
4004:I
3983:]
3980:1
3977:,
3974:0
3971:[
3968:=
3965:I
3952:I
3944:I
3933:I
3926:I
3921:I
3905:)
3897:(
3867:(
3839:(
3816:(
3793:(
3778:(
3745:(
3701:(
3686:(
3674:)
3658:y
3655:=
3652:)
3649:x
3646:(
3638:b
3613:y
3609:x
3607:(
3604:b
3565:(
3550:(
3526:(
3493:-
3425:(
3402:(
3339:(
3317:(
3294:(
3220:(
3204:(
3189:(
3153:(
3134:j
3130:i
3128:p
3125:m
3121:1
3117:0
3113:n
3109:1
3089:(
3071:(
3051:(
3047:—
3028:(
3005:(
2978:(
2968:"
2964:"
2947:)
2945:c
2941:t
2939:(
2920:(
2899:(
2881:(
2873:.
2835:(
2797:)
2795:c
2791:t
2789:(
2774:(
2759:)
2757:c
2753:t
2751:(
2736:(
2716:(
2683:(
2669:(
2650:(
2603:(
2585:(
2579:d
2555:(
2504:.
2502:Q
2472:(
2462:Q
2446:Q
2398:(
2383:(
2359:(
2336:—
2301:.
2231:(
2187:(
2068:(
2050:(
2030:(
2003:(
1997:d
1984:(
1978:d
1974:x
1970:y
1941:(
1933:(
1906:(
1880:(
1853:(
1830:p
1826:p
1822:R
1818:R
1813:p
1801:(
1786:(
1773:.
1752:(
1720:(
1701:(
1659:(
1578:☎
1558:(
1519:(
1515:–
1499:(
1478:(
1463:(
1375:(
1359:(
1307:(
1286:)
1284:c
1280:t
1278:(
1262:(
1242:.
71:)
65:e
58:t
51:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
