1780:
for general overview. It was also specifically for the lay public and did not generally contain articles written by, or intended for experts, or any great technological depth. That purpose was the result of a perceived marketing niche, combined with a practical physical limitation. Names like “The Book of
Knowledge” hint at greater aspirations, but these aspirations were just impractical to the point of impossibility. Let’s not make the common mistake of underestimating the current information revolution, or limit our own resource goals because we don’t understand our future potential. We don’t know the future of this Wiki resource in great detail, but we can speculate a bit. We now have a magic book of knowledge in one beautifully bound volume. You probably have it in your lap right now. It can do anything the old encyclopedia on your hall shelf could do, and so much more. We are at the dawn of this information/connectivity era and we can format this resource any way we want. First though, let’s consider our resources for building Knowledge. Despite constant criticism, I don’t share any real pessimism whatever regarding the eventual power, accuracy, or integrity of a Wiki site. Our engine is the strongest. It is humanity itself, tireless. Our engine will work 24 hours a day until those of us reading this thread now are dead and gone, and then our engine will work on. We need to rethink this resource’s ultimate purpose because the eventual capacity and the real power and longevity of the Wiki engine is beyond our current imagination. Our magic one volume encyclopedia has no last page! This does not mean it is an annoyingly long book which you just can’t seem to finish. It can be written so it is comfortable to stop at any time, or you can go on, or you can skip ahead as far as you want. We know more today than we did 10 years ago about how self-organizing and resistant to intended boundaries internet sites are, which is all Knowledge is after all. Our ultimate layout is a fractal hierarchy with indefinite resolution, whether we intend this today or not. To respond specifically to some of the posts above, visualizing a fractal net structure. We can make the largest scale appear and function much like an old style encyclopedia. This satisfies those of us who think of and intend to use this tool as a source of general overview. No problem. A bit deeper it functions and feels more like a text book. Math proofs for example would belong here. Maybe not today, but time and essentially unlimited input resources could make Knowledge as deep and connected as the future of the resource can make it, and that is very deep. This is why I say we can serve many purposes at once with this tool, and hurt or limit no user group with our depth and connectivity. It is important to have this dialogue because we are suggesting a future evolutionary course and scope for Knowledge. How well we model the future, in terms of structure and what people will come to want and expect, greatly affects ultimate success of this tool.
1584:
self-organizing via links to other concepts, making precision and accuracy the essential components of "readability". The effort to clarify, for lay readers like myself by reducing or restricting the use of terminology and/or scope can have the unfortunate collateral result of inhibiting the ability of the mathematician writing the article to be precise and inclusively accurate. I agree the first line of the article should be a hip shot definition, as accurate and precise as a sound byte can be, or put conversely, as much of a sound byte as it can be and still be precise and accurate. Sacrifice inclusiveness in the hip shot definition sentence only. Then get into it as deeply as necessary to satisfy even the most knowledgeable reader. References are of course essential and do provide some of that depth which will be useful to experts, but imagine if this encyclopedia became so ubiquitous and functional that experts would want to publish here! Knowledge should be a serious long term source of information as current and technically complete as possible, with an initial hip shot for the superficially interested, many links for the serious lay reader and expert alike, and sufficient depth to attract, satisfy, and retain the expert. The accessibility issue is solved by careful inclusion of copious linking to explanatory concepts. Each reader can link down, or up, to their current level of understanding. (Remember when we had to physically get up and go search down any background we needed, starting in reference books, and proceeding to text after text on the trail and with luck, eventually find even one actual explanation of the concept we were hunting. Links are fun,easy, hierarchical, and inherently self-organizing from the readers point of view, and enable each reader to progress at max speed.) The point being, there is no accessibility issue so long as any user group can quickly link to what they need in order to incrementally build understanding. There is no magic bullet for either the beginner or expert so let's make it deep and complete, and thereby most valuable.
1688:
very few readers, including experts, truly "understand" for random example, what "reality" is actually being represented in the most advanced topological correlations of complex math objects with "real world" quantum events, etc.. The point being … as editors and writers, let’s picture such a level for any and all readers, at which we all are just looking for explanatory links and trying to build understanding for ourselves. Picture the following scenario and it may clarify exactly who I think we should be considering with our purpose and depth. Somewhere out there a very gifted kid has just received access to internet service and a computer. He is very interested in math but has no local infrastructure to teach him. He discovers our encyclopedia. I think he should be able to form, from the ground up, with no outside tutoring, a math understanding which places him/her in a position to push the frontiers of math and contribute as an expert. So make it deep for those who can swim there. This does no harm to the superficially interested.
1746:. The goal of an encyclopedia – any encyclopedia, including Knowledge – is to provide an overview of a topic. An encyclopedia article may have more or less depth, but it should never be more than an overview. This is why Knowledge math articles generally do not contain proofs. While proofs are sometimes appropriate, just as proofs are sometimes appropriate in published survey articles, most of the time proofs should be confined to text books and research papers. For this reason, a serious and conscientious student will never be able to learn a subject from Knowledge. They will need to look up the details in a comprehensive source, and this is no different in mathematics than in any other subject.
2122:'s quick removal of the merge tag, I am slightly inclined to keeping the articles separate. The vast majority of incidence geometries are not linear spaces, or even partial linear spaces. Unfortunately, those that aren't at least partial linear spaces are not very interesting from a geometrical point of view (although they may have a wider appeal if viewed as hypergraphs). To keep the articles separate, the incidence geometry article would have to be loaded up with what I consider to be uninteresting examples. While this may be the "right thing to do", I don't feel very good about it.
1708:
hierarchy of “math level” should be in a given article, there is a more serious concern. We are all prisoners of our own limited world views and understandings. If we “organize” our math content for say, the hypothetical super gifted kid I mention above, who “sees” in math much more clearly than we do, then we are almost certainly doing a large disservice to his understanding by handing him our limited preconceptions of prerequisites and orders of presentation etc.. In math, as with other language acquisition, this imposition of hierarchy is simply unnecessary.
1684:
etc.. But math differs a bit here in that, as a language of logic, it is itself quintessentially hierarchical. This is why I suggest that associated links in math articles are self-organizing. As a lay reader, I can attest that even the most lucid and well written articles still necessitate a constant following of explanatory linking on my part. No problem. If you don't have enough interest to follow links till you get were you need to be, you are never going to really understand the content anyway.
2148:
into real overview article on incidence geometry rather than being only a (detailed) introduction into linear spaces for the most part. The literature under references actually covers all that, but its content hasn't really been used for the article yet. In that sense the incidence geometry is missing its topic a bit currently, but that problem doesn't really get fixed by merging the articles (unless we merge it under the same linear space and sort of "dump" incidence geometry for now).
40:
2074:. My question for this board is, are objects which have infinite surface area but finite volume (or, for example, infinite perimeter and finite area) discussed as a group? The current category name is clearly wrong, but I'm curious whether this grouping of objects by those characteristics is discussed in the literature, and if you can think of other examples of such objects. Input is welcome at the linked discussion board.--
1784:
in the deeper fractal layers of this net which will not be exclusively linked to
Knowledge of course, but associated with this Wiki tool only to the extent that we make it so. At some point Knowledge may just be a name on a particular internet portal. A data base in the future will not have any of our currently expected limits. A lesson we learn from Google is that the model behind the engine is very important.
1620:
setting prevents many readers from understanding the concept since advanced terminology has to be used. The reader has to look up each unknown term, more new terms pop up, and so on, ending in frustration. Articles should start with the most accessible setting, of course using precise terms and definitions, and then gradually introduce more and more abstraction. Just my opinion, --
1845:
don't see how sniping on a different site is supposed to be helpful. If you find the articles poorly written or unhelpful then you're free to use another source of information. If someone has constructive criticism to offer then I'm sure most of us will try to take it on board, but I think we can ignore people who basically say "I picked this article at random and it sucks." --
1262:
obvious flaws, and the author(s) seem to deny that there is anything wrong with the article. I do not have a lot of experience with editing
Knowledge, I do not know how it is determined who gets control over an article, but I hope there is someone out there with more Knowledge experience, more time on their hands, and more expertise in topology who can improve this article.
3283:
2103:. Does it look that way to everyone else too? I imagine the original author might have been translating from German and might have overlooked the other page. Although a lot of the content is the same, I'm putting up a merge tag to encourage people to move useful stuff from this article into the incidence geometry article.
1783:
A couple more stray thoughts. At some point we may link to each and every element in the library of congress or the future equivalent, patent data base, medical data base, … (n) data base. At some point all users may be linked to each other if they so choose. Experts will be publishing and roaming
1687:
I think part of any apparent disagreement here may be caused by differences in what level of math we are individually imagining presenting in our articles. A lay perspective may be helpful here. Some of you reading this may not remember when any and all math was new to you. But at a certain point,
1656:
I think the idea of aiming primarily for accuracy and depth is totally and completely wrong for an encyclopaedia. That is writing for the writer not the reader. If they need a more precise idea of the reader they should aim at least the fist couple of sections at I would say someone who is six months
1579:
For accessibility. Whenever mathematical symbols initially appear in one of our articles, those symbols could be immediately followed by a written out version of a "spoken language" annunciation of those symbols. This is extremely helpful to a lay reader. Not only does it make clear the correct way
3509:
What I see is that hexominoes 1 and 22 have this type of symmetry. However, their symmetry is partly aligned with the grid lines and partly not aligned. Hexomino 1 has a horizontal axis of symmetry which divides it evenly in in half around it's middle along the grid lines, but the vertical axis of
3146:
For the "Siegel–Walfisz theorem" - the first line in the statement section defines the equation and then points out the symbols are the von mangoldt function and the totient function... I'm not sure if that line was meant to be at the bottom of that section or if the defintion is incorrect, but the
2563:
is an argument for the former but a parameter for the latter. True, "This means that in solving problems in mathematical statistics related to negative hypergeometric distributions, tables of hypergeometric distributions can be used." However, these are really different distributions. Just like the
1779:
It appears the main issue in this thread is really … What is the purpose and intent of an encyclopedia? I propose we seriously rethink this question. I agree that in the past, when limited to a number of hard copy volumes which could reasonably fit in a person’s home, an encyclopedia was intended
1675:
Concerning accessibility vs accuracy. These are not either/or alternatives, but are mutually compatible and can be absolutely concurrent. Consider ... What is the purpose of this encyclopedia, or to rephrase, who is this encyclopedia intended to service, and what do we hope to accomplish on their
1844:
That article came up in the
Polynomial talk page previously when someone tried to address the criticisms. The polynomial article was being used as an example of supposedly systemic problems with WP as a whole, so fixing a single article is not the point. Not that WP doesn't have some issues, but I
1703:
Math has been taught many ways during my lifetime, starting by rote, the "New Math", etc.. But I propose math be taught more like a spoken language, since it is a language. Our children don't need a language hierarchy guide when they learn to speak. People learning math don't either. What they
1699:
in that it is ideal to start as gently as possible without sacrificing accuracy. For example, if an initial explanatory sentence is in fact technically inaccurate due to say, a lack of inclusion of detail, note this fact and provide a link to further detail. Ideally, all our articles will be well
2147:
Having said that it might make sense to reduce the current redundancy somewhat, that means the Erdös-de Bruijn theorem and detailed definition of linear spaces could be shortened in incidence geometry and moved over to linear spaces. But more importantly the incidence geometry needs to be turned
2139:
Why does merging make little sense to me? Because a linear space is to incidence geometry roughly what a group (or any other particular algebraic structure) is to algebra. Meaning you usually want/need separate articles for both. One being a larger overview/survey article and the other being more
1619:
I disagree here. Articles should be as accessible as possible while being as accurate as possible, not the other way round. There are countless examples of mathematical concepts which have been introduced in a simple setting and then generalized later on. Starting an article with the most general
1867:
Just FYI about an upcoming software change related to mathematics: The new "Beta
Features" program is being introduced for opt-in-only for testing of new and experimental software features. One of the features in the initial testing set (available here on approximately 21 November) will be the
1829:
Yes that article describes the problem okay, we need to have a decent idea of who we're writing for and then write for them. We're trying to construct a knowledge utility not a perfect gleaming spire. As opposed to that article though I believe as an encyclopaedia we should be writing on topics
1683:
A couple thoughts on how we present math. Is math any different than, say, an historical article on the
American Civil War. Yes, math is different because of its pre-organized internal logic. Many non-math topics are inherently hierarchical in some senses, such as chronological order of events
1261:
While there may be some useful information in the later parts of the article and some good references, it gets off to a very bad start. If you are a mathematician and you read the first one or two sentences you will know what I mean. There are many valid complaints on the Talk page about its
1707:
Lastly, my initial post was inspired largely by the thread above regarding editor determined levels of presentation, and was partly intended as a cautionary note. Aside from the unnecessary and extremely difficult and impractical task of reaching mutual agreement concerning what the correct
1583:
Re: Math levels. Since the evaluation of math level/difficulty is largely subjective and IMHO not specifically useful to the reader, as a lay reader of math articles, I would prefer our presentation of mathematics focus almost exclusively on accuracy and precision. Presentation hierarchy is
3228:. Certainly the other meanings exist, but are much less common. And "Venus Equilateral" should not even be on the dab page — dabs aren't supposed to list everything that has a substring matching the title, but only subjects that could reasonably be referred to by the whole title. —
1787:
I understand the importance of limits. Do what you do and do it well, don’t try to do everything. This is still true and for current practical purposes, some of the posts above regarding limitation of this resource are very valid. I only say, let’s make our model forward
3528:
I think "aligned with" means "parallel to" here. So the description is simply saying that one axis of mirror symmetry is horizontal and the other is vertical - they do not necessarily have to be along the grid lines themselves. I have clarified this description at
2297:. He lived from 1921-2006 and worked at the University of Kansas on ordered algebraic systems and group theory. I haven't worked in those fields, and have had difficulty finding information on him, other than a large number of "descendants" at the
2365:
seems to confirm that the negative hypergeometric distribution is the same as the hypergeometric distribution with different parameters. I don't remember that as being accurate, but I can't find a source to the contrary, at the moment. —
2195:— apparently DrMicro copied or too-closely paraphrased some of his sources over a long series of edits, some of which involve mathematics or statistics. I checked three of the mathematics articles and found a problem in one of them,
2818:
2948:
3202:
changed both of these into disambiguation pages, with a lot of incoming links. This seems wrong - before disambiguators start fiddling with all of these the articles, is there no primary meaning of these terms in mathematics?
3089:
The first redirect should go in the other direction. Perfect sets (contained in some larger topological space) are the more important notion; just because the concept can be defined intrinsically doesn't mean it should be.
2151:
All in all we have 2 articles existing in their own right and which both need to extended/rewritten separately in their own way. Once that happens the relative high degree of redundancy, they currently have, will fade away
3683:
In 12th century, Bhāskara's gave the principles of differential calculus and its application to astronomical problems and computations. He was perhaps the first to conceive the differential coefficient and differential
1397:
2166:
Subsequently, a few things Kmhkmh mentioned dispelled my doubts, so please consider this idea retracted. The task has turned more into "make sure these articles work with each other with a minimum of redundancy."
3450:
Any difference between cyclic and semi-cyclic numbers that makes it so that cyclic numbers are interesting but semi-cyclic numbers are not?? (For clarification on what I mean, go to the
Details section of the
2136:
I didn't mean to block a discussion, I just removed the tag because it made little sense to me and when I came across it there was no related thread on the linked discussion page either, hence removed it.
1419:
The second one seems like a very good article -- clearly a legitimate topic, not obviously plagiarized, generally informative and well written (though perhaps not uniformly in an encyclopedic style). --
1723:
I see practically no point of agreement between what you have said and what I said. You said you strongly agreed with what I said and then went on to say the complete opposite as far as I can make out.
1680:
here. We are creating this database for the users/readers. So the question is, ... How best to serve them. The purpose is to provide easily accessible, accurate information to anyone who wants it.
3634:
63:
3407:
It can be shown that no cyclic numbers (other than trivial single digits) exist in any numeric base which is a perfect square; thus there are no cyclic numbers in hexadecimal, base 4, or nonary.
2140:
specialized. In theory one could argue as long as there isn't tat much material covered in total one article, that is the overview article, might suffice temporarily. The emphasis however is on
1360:
earlier this year, I thought to just create a stub for now. I don't have the time (and admittedly competence and inclination) to write the full article. Appreciation to anyone who contributes.
1540:
Dear mathematicians: This article about a number theorist needs some third party sources. I'm not sure what types of references a mathematician needs, but perhaps someone here can help. —
1441:-- would appreciate it if somebody with expertise in mathematical-modeling control-system stability could take a look, and expand the article into something a bit more fleshed out. Thanks.
1907:
3510:
symmetry is not along the grid lines. And
Hexomino 22 has vertical symmetry along the grid lines, but horizontally it divides itself along it's middle tiles and not along the grid lines.
1401:
2071:
1357:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
982:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
887:
883:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
597:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
2192:
2001:
3612:
2628:
2595:
2557:
1157:
1102:
1043:
988:
933:
878:
823:
768:
713:
658:
603:
548:
493:
438:
383:
328:
273:
218:
163:
108:
25:
3476:
1580:
to "say" the symbols, but it identifies each symbol by giving it a name, often instantly making clear the purpose/function/order/directionality of the procedure involved.
1534:
56:
1493:
102:
98:
94:
90:
2498:
2437:
3320:
2466:
2405:
1814:
by Adrian Riskin of
Whittier College on Wikipediocracy which expresses similar concerns an looks at the polynomial article in particular. It might be worth a read.--
2253:. The website has no references of its own, so I am formed to conclude that this is a bit of original research. As far as I can tell, not suitable for mainspace. --
3733:
2980:
1327:
It does seem rather odd that the lead paragraph gives the definition of sequentially compact rather than compact, especially since we already have an article for
21:
2048:
Thanks. I have left a note on the Lotka–Volterra equation talk page and postponed G13 deletion of the article for six months to give time for this to happen. —
49:
3709:
Several peer-reviewed articles in reputable journals would be a good start. Inventing calculus is a tall claim; there'd better be damn good evidence for it.
3652:
2683:
1470:, and then restored after it was discovered that the result left no good target for many of its links. Now it has been proposed instead to redirect it to
3000:
has a clear exposition of the relations of these different distributions and could be used as a source in the article. The associated R module refers to
3038:
2829:
2678:. Both describe similar events, but are different distributions. The probability mass function of the negative hypergeometric distribution should be
2245:
The only source is a website that discusses the formulation in more detail. From what I can tell, this is a technique for an analog of integration (
3411:. It seems a little odd to phrase this in this way and if the proof is easy, it might be more correct to include it instead of "It can be shown".
1638:
has a really good point here. Start with the more accessible setting and then move toward higher abstraction and generalizations of the concept.
3703:
17:
1438:
3630:
2219:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1891:
Good news. Thanks for starting the implementation of the VE math editing features earlier rather than later. I look forward to trying it. --
3480:
2337:
2319:
1980:
3588:
3584:
2222:. The submission lacks references, and I cannot tell whether the topic is notable. The assistance of other editors would be appreciated.
1253:
I turn to
Knowledge often for mathematics. I have found most of the articles to be excellent. However, I did not care for the article
3157:
1742:
I would like to disagree with the anonymous user's assertion that a bright student should be able to learn mathematics from Knowledge.
1442:
2269:
Agree -- looks like someone's personal research notes or something. I don't think it has any plausible path to becoming an article. --
3597:
1789:
1709:
1585:
1433:
But what about the first one? It is a stub, and says so; it was approved for mainspace the 29th, and seems okay. I put several more
1986:
Dear mathematicians: I first read about this mathematical term in a P.D. James novel. Is it notable enough to have an article? —
2144:
and in this case we already have 2 articles. So what's the point in merging them now just to split them off again sometime later?
3346:, but I could use help putting in the (very complicated) definitions, as my wiki-latex is not as good as it could be. Thanks!
2671:
2233:
1606:
1318:
3260:
I suspected as much. I am going to move these to "Foo (disambiguation)" titles and restore the original redirects. Thanks!
3577:
2298:
1369:
1881:
3718:
3664:
3646:
3624:
3605:
3570:
3542:
3522:
3488:
3464:
3439:
3420:
3389:
3355:
3332:
3305:
3275:
3255:
3237:
3218:
3181:
3165:
3131:
3113:
3099:
3083:
3047:
3013:
2991:
2665:
2651:
2639:
2373:
2356:
2331:
2308:
2278:
2262:
2239:
2208:
2176:
2161:
2131:
2112:
2083:
2057:
2043:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2022:
I think the material there is valuable, and in its present form the best thing to do with it would be to merge it with
2016:
1995:
1971:
1953:
1937:
1922:
1900:
1885:
1854:
1839:
1823:
1797:
1769:
1755:
1733:
1717:
1666:
1657:
away from completing the normal prerequisites for starting on the topic. The sections after can can be more technical.
1647:
1629:
1610:
1593:
1566:
1549:
1525:
1508:
1487:
1450:
1428:
1413:
1386:
1340:
1322:
1298:
1271:
2955:
2362:
2344:
1475:
1238:
3506:. Their symmetry group has four elements. It is the dihedral group of order 2, also known as the Klein four-group."
2959:
1328:
1928:
Well, no. This is mostly a how to guide for a particular topic in something like high school analytic geometry. --
3071:
1600:
1312:
1217:
3642:
3566:
3233:
2204:
1483:
3484:
1811:
3161:
3714:
3660:
3620:
3558:
3328:
2327:
2274:
2250:
2096:
2089:
2039:
1877:
1793:
1713:
1589:
1446:
1424:
1409:
1294:
3601:
3225:
2648:
2370:
2305:
2079:
1471:
1463:
3518:
3460:
3044:
3009:
2675:
2258:
2053:
2012:
1991:
1967:
1933:
1918:
1896:
1743:
1562:
1545:
1521:
1504:
1908:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Transformation on the graph from a basic function using Log and LN
3514:
1331:. Also that the correct definition was in the lead until about 5 years ago when someone changed it. --
1249:
Is anyone willing + able to substantially revise or rewrite this article on compact spaces (topology)?
3594:
I will explore this and other WikiProjects further to see if this need has been addressed elsewhere.
3153:
1819:
1267:
1263:
3691:
3638:
3562:
3538:
3435:
3385:
3251:
3229:
3177:
3127:
3095:
2670:
The negative hypergeometric distribution is related to the hypergeometric distribution just as the
2600:
2567:
2503:
2200:
1479:
3656:
3616:
3554:
3470:
3377:
3324:
2323:
2270:
2229:
2172:
2127:
2108:
2100:
2035:
1420:
1405:
1308:
1290:
1223:
1873:
3686:
This is reported in the name of Goonatilake 1999. I wonder how much historical detail the page
3427:
3351:
2645:
2367:
2302:
2075:
1643:
1378:
3699:
3456:
3416:
3300:
3270:
3213:
3109:
3079:
3005:
2987:
2661:
2635:
2352:
2254:
2157:
2049:
2008:
1987:
1963:
1929:
1914:
1892:
1850:
1625:
1558:
1541:
1517:
1500:
1499:
There seem to be a lot of mathematical submissions at the Afc this week. Here's another. —
1336:
1221:
1219:
39:
3343:
2471:
2410:
1815:
1704:
need is freedom and availability of answers to their own individualized questions. Links!
1349:
3368:
Thanks to Boris Tsirelson for bringing this to my attention above. I have proposed that
2442:
2381:
2007:
Dear mathematicians: Another old stale Afc submission. Should it be saved or let go? —
1281:@Gsspradlin : You've formatted an internal link as if it were an external link, writing
3534:
3431:
3400:
3381:
3247:
3199:
3173:
3123:
3091:
2246:
1949:
1835:
1765:
1751:
1729:
1662:
2965:
2813:{\displaystyle P(X=n)={\frac {{\binom {n-1}{k-1}}{\binom {N-n}{K-k}}}{\binom {N}{K}}}}
3727:
3452:
3369:
3362:
3061:
2225:
2168:
2123:
2104:
2072:
Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_November_12#Category:Gabriel.27s_variety
1868:
LaTeX-based math formula editor for VisualEditor. There is some more information at
1286:
1869:
3347:
1696:
1639:
1434:
1361:
2982:
whose role is unclear to me since it is not explained in the text. Best wishes, --
2943:{\displaystyle P(X=k)={\frac {{\binom {n}{k}}{\binom {N-n}{K-k}}}{\binom {N}{K}}}}
1700:
written, non-terminology/jargon laden as possible, and as accessible as possible.
2030:. Maybe the simplest thing to do would just be to copy it onto the talk page for
1289:. If you're going to be editing Knowledge articles, you should know about this.
3695:
3412:
3373:
3291:
3261:
3204:
3188:
3119:
3105:
3075:
3057:
2983:
2657:
2631:
2348:
2290:
2196:
2153:
2119:
1846:
1692:
1635:
1621:
1332:
3321:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Minimum maximal k-partial-matching problem
3710:
3172:
In the original language they were separate sentences. Should be clear now. ᛭
1913:
Dear mathematicians: Is there anything worth saving in this old AfC draft? —
1672:
Some good comments which inspire a bit of clarification regarding my post.
3694:) should contain, and how such details should be evaluated for reliability.
3615:. It doesn't seem very active despite the nearly 50,000 articles it covers.
3192:
2644:
Sorry. Perhaps whoever created the article read it that way, though.... —
1945:
1831:
1761:
1747:
1725:
1677:
1658:
2824:
while the probability mass function of the hypergeometric distribution is
3687:
3678:
3530:
3499:
1467:
2289:
An editor, while creating an article about an (apparently) more notable
1307:
There is already an ongoing discussion on this subject at the bottom of
3147:
totient function doesn't appear in the definition directly preceding..
2997:
3150:
It was a little confusing - maybe someone can clarify it? Thanks..
2378:
With different parameters? Not quite so. "The distribution function
3498:
Under the heading "symmetry", the fifth bullet point down says: "2
2026:
to create a new section, expanding on the more limited material in
1870:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/11/07/introducing-beta-features/
1282:
1256:
3635:
Knowledge:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Academics and educators
3034:
Just in case someone here is interested and/or can help, see:
1830:
rather than being a dictionary with short simple definitions.
1224:
33:
2343:
This article is completely wrong. It seems to be a copy of
3494:
Correction for a possible error in the "Hexomino" article
3426:
This was discussed recently at the Mathematics Ref Desk
2407:
of the negative hypergeometric function with parameters
3066:
2220:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Summation formulae
2214:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Summation formulae
3104:
I see. And what about "Perfect sets"? Why such entry?
2193:
Knowledge:Contributor copyright investigations/DrMicro
2968:
2832:
2686:
2603:
2570:
2506:
2474:
2445:
2413:
2384:
2320:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Remez polynomial
2002:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Atto-fox problem
1981:
Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Brilliant number
3502:(coloured purple) have two axes of mirror symmetry,
3002:
Wilks, S. S. (1963), Mathematical Statistics, Wiley.
2293:, found references to a mathematician listed in the
1760:Thinking of articles as surveys sounds good to me.
3477:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Spread polynomials
3224:In both cases I think the triangle meaning is the
2974:
2942:
2812:
2622:
2589:
2551:
2492:
2460:
2431:
2399:
1535:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Dinesh Thakur
1466:was briefly redirected to the disambiguation page
2249:) in the finite difference calculus based on the
1494:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Smith space
2439:is related to the hypergeometric distribution
1557:This one is in the encyclopedia now. Thanks! —
2933:
2920:
2911:
2882:
2873:
2860:
2803:
2790:
2781:
2752:
2743:
2714:
1944:No. It's like a poorly-written study guide.
1232:This page has archives. Sections older than
57:
8:
3653:Knowledge:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/BPH
3589:WP:WikiProject Scientists and Mathematicians
3585:WP:WikiProject Mathematicians and Scientists
3378:talk:perfect space#Move and rewrite slightly
3613:WikiProject Biography/Science and academia
2028:Lotka–Volterra equation#An_example_problem
64:
50:
3677:Recently the following text was added to
3479:may be of interest to this community. --
3246:Same for "Isosceles triangle theorem." ᛭
2967:
2932:
2919:
2910:
2881:
2879:
2872:
2859:
2857:
2854:
2831:
2802:
2789:
2780:
2751:
2749:
2742:
2713:
2711:
2708:
2685:
2614:
2602:
2581:
2569:
2505:
2473:
2444:
2412:
2383:
1474:. Please contribute to the discussion at
3561:. More opinions would be helpful here. —
3559:Talk:Free abelian group#Subgroup Closure
1962:Fine. I have tagged it for deletion. —
88:
3637:(very active and regularly updated). —
3376:over the redirect. Please comment at
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics
3734:WikiProject Mathematics archives/2013
3672:
3631:Knowledge talk:Notability (academics)
1283:http://en.wikipedia.org/Compact_space
1257:http://en.wikipedia.org/Compact_space
7:
3395:No cyclic numbers in square bases...
2338:Negative hypergeometric distribution
2199:, but there's a lot more to check. —
3372:be rewritten slightly and moved to
2301:. Anyone want to work on that? —
2295:American Men & Women of Science
1812:Elementary Mathematics on Knowledge
1806:Elementary Mathematics on Knowledge
3403:has the following sentence in it:
2924:
2886:
2864:
2794:
2756:
2718:
2034:and let someone do the merging. --
1309:Talk:Compact space#First paragraph
45:WikiProject Mathematics archives (
32:
2962:seems to have an extra parameter
1516:This one has been created now. —
1236:may be automatically archived by
3673:Bhaskara's 12th century calculus
3504:both aligned with the grid lines
3455:article and there's an example.
3281:
2630:are really different functions.
2191:Project members may wish to see
38:
3053:Perfect set versus perfect sets
1876:for anyone who is interested.
1676:behalf? I agree strongly with
2848:
2836:
2702:
2690:
2672:negative binomial distribution
2623:{\displaystyle x\mapsto x^{a}}
2607:
2590:{\displaystyle x\mapsto a^{x}}
2574:
2552:{\displaystyle F(n)=1-G(m-1).}
2543:
2531:
2516:
2510:
2455:
2449:
2394:
2388:
1439:Talk:Liénard–Chipart_criterion
1:
3719:21:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
3704:16:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
3665:02:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
3647:19:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
3625:18:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
3606:18:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
3578:WP:WikiProject Mathematicians
3571:15:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
3543:16:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
3523:16:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
3489:06:14, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
3465:16:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
3440:12:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
3421:12:40, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
3390:19:46, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
3356:17:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
3333:22:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
3306:19:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
3276:19:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
3256:19:51, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
3238:22:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
3219:22:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
3198:I see that about a week ago,
3182:19:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
3166:16:52, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
3132:17:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
3118:That should also redirect to
3114:11:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
3100:08:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
3084:08:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
3048:11:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
3014:20:44, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2992:20:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2666:20:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2652:18:26, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2640:15:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2374:14:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2357:08:35, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2332:16:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
2309:19:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
2299:Mathematics Genealogy Project
2279:01:12, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
2263:00:18, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
2240:23:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
2209:05:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
2177:14:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
2162:00:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
2132:16:52, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
2118:Although I am not supporting
2113:00:21, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
2084:21:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
2058:23:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
2044:20:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
2017:14:56, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
1996:20:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
1599:Many excellent points here.
1396:Hello again! Care to look at
3142:Article needs a slight fix..
1972:22:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1954:17:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1938:17:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1923:16:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1901:21:35, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1886:19:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1855:15:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1840:22:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1824:21:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1798:21:02, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1770:13:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1756:04:23, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1734:22:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1718:21:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1667:10:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1648:10:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1630:08:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1611:20:11, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
1594:19:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
1567:15:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1550:16:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
1526:15:49, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
1509:23:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
1488:07:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
1451:20:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
1429:01:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
1414:13:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
1387:17:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
1341:02:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
1323:23:57, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
1299:18:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
1272:23:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
2956:hypergeometric distribution
2363:Encyclopedia of Mathematics
2345:Hypergeometric distribution
1744:Knowledge is not a textbook
1691:I further agree with both
1476:Talk:Constant (mathematics)
3750:
3039:Math 2.0 (feedback wanted)
1329:Sequentially compact space
3342:I've created the article
3072:Derived set (mathematics)
2070:To this discussion here:
3633:(reasonably active) and
3553:See the recent edits to
2251:Euler summation formula
2218:Another editor created
2097:Linear_space_(geometry)
2090:Linear_space_(geometry)
2032:Lotka–Volterra equation
2024:Lotka–Volterra equation
3557:and the discussion at
3409:
2976:
2958:). The formula in the
2944:
2814:
2624:
2591:
2553:
2494:
2462:
2433:
2401:
2318:Care taking a look at
1874:mw:About Beta Features
1575:A couple general ideas
1472:variable (mathematics)
1464:Constant (mathematics)
1239:Lowercase sigmabot III
3405:
2977:
2945:
2815:
2676:binomial distribution
2625:
2592:
2554:
2495:
2493:{\displaystyle N,M,n}
2463:
2434:
2432:{\displaystyle N,M,m}
2402:
1437:on the topic here --
2966:
2830:
2684:
2601:
2568:
2504:
2472:
2461:{\displaystyle G(m)}
2443:
2411:
2400:{\displaystyle F(n)}
2382:
1810:There is an article
3692:history of calculus
3446:Semi-cyclic numbers
3629:Also relevant are
3555:free abelian group
3549:Free abelian group
3471:Spread polynomials
3361:Requested move of
3316:AfC submission (2)
3074:. Rather strange.
2972:
2954:(parameters as in
2940:
2810:
2674:is related to the
2620:
2587:
2549:
2490:
2458:
2429:
2397:
2101:incidence geometry
2099:is a duplicate of
1878:Whatamidoing (WMF)
3576:New WikiProject?
3156:comment added by
2975:{\displaystyle n}
2938:
2931:
2909:
2871:
2808:
2801:
2779:
2741:
1352:is now an article
1246:
1245:
95:Nov 2002–Dec 2003
3741:
3298:
3289:
3285:
3284:
3268:
3211:
3168:
3069:
2981:
2979:
2978:
2973:
2949:
2947:
2946:
2941:
2939:
2937:
2936:
2923:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2908:
2897:
2885:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2863:
2855:
2819:
2817:
2816:
2811:
2809:
2807:
2806:
2793:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2778:
2767:
2755:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2740:
2729:
2717:
2709:
2629:
2627:
2626:
2621:
2619:
2618:
2596:
2594:
2593:
2588:
2586:
2585:
2558:
2556:
2555:
2550:
2500:by the relation
2499:
2497:
2496:
2491:
2468:with parameters
2467:
2465:
2464:
2459:
2438:
2436:
2435:
2430:
2406:
2404:
2403:
2398:
2238:
2124:Bill Cherowitzo
1603:
1315:
1241:
1225:
66:
59:
52:
42:
34:
3749:
3748:
3744:
3743:
3742:
3740:
3739:
3738:
3724:
3723:
3690:(as opposed to
3675:
3651:Yet another is
3581:
3551:
3496:
3474:
3448:
3399:The article on
3397:
3366:
3344:Gromov boundary
3340:
3338:Gromov boundary
3318:
3292:
3282:
3280:
3262:
3226:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
3205:
3196:
3151:
3144:
3122:, of course. --
3106:Boris Tsirelson
3076:Boris Tsirelson
3065:
3055:
3032:
2964:
2963:
2918:
2898:
2887:
2880:
2858:
2856:
2828:
2827:
2788:
2768:
2757:
2750:
2730:
2719:
2712:
2710:
2682:
2681:
2658:Boris Tsirelson
2632:Boris Tsirelson
2610:
2599:
2598:
2577:
2566:
2565:
2502:
2501:
2470:
2469:
2441:
2440:
2409:
2408:
2380:
2379:
2347:. Sincerely, --
2341:
2316:
2287:
2223:
2216:
2189:
2093:
2068:
2066:input requested
2005:
1984:
1911:
1865:
1816:User:Salix alba
1808:
1601:
1577:
1538:
1497:
1461:
1394:
1383:
1354:
1350:Matrix analysis
1313:
1251:
1237:
1226:
1220:
1211:
1097:
87:
86:
73:
70:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
3747:
3745:
3737:
3736:
3726:
3725:
3722:
3721:
3674:
3671:
3670:
3669:
3668:
3667:
3649:
3639:David Eppstein
3583:Alternatively
3580:
3574:
3563:David Eppstein
3550:
3547:
3546:
3545:
3495:
3492:
3481:101.119.26.132
3473:
3468:
3447:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3401:Cyclic numbers
3396:
3393:
3365:
3359:
3339:
3336:
3317:
3314:
3313:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3278:
3241:
3240:
3230:David Eppstein
3200:User:Duoduoduo
3195:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3143:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3054:
3051:
3042:
3041:
3031:
3028:
3027:
3026:
3025:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3016:
2971:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2935:
2930:
2927:
2922:
2913:
2907:
2904:
2901:
2896:
2893:
2890:
2884:
2875:
2870:
2867:
2862:
2853:
2850:
2847:
2844:
2841:
2838:
2835:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2805:
2800:
2797:
2792:
2783:
2777:
2774:
2771:
2766:
2763:
2760:
2754:
2745:
2739:
2736:
2733:
2728:
2725:
2722:
2716:
2707:
2704:
2701:
2698:
2695:
2692:
2689:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2606:
2584:
2580:
2576:
2573:
2548:
2545:
2542:
2539:
2536:
2533:
2530:
2527:
2524:
2521:
2518:
2515:
2512:
2509:
2489:
2486:
2483:
2480:
2477:
2457:
2454:
2451:
2448:
2428:
2425:
2422:
2419:
2416:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2387:
2340:
2335:
2315:
2314:AfC submission
2312:
2286:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2266:
2265:
2247:Indefinite sum
2215:
2212:
2201:David Eppstein
2188:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2149:
2145:
2137:
2092:
2087:
2076:Obi-Wan Kenobi
2067:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2004:
1999:
1983:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1957:
1956:
1941:
1940:
1910:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1864:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1807:
1804:
1802:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1737:
1736:
1670:
1669:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1614:
1613:
1602:Sławomir Biały
1576:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1537:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1496:
1491:
1480:David Eppstein
1460:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1393:
1392:AfC submission
1390:
1381:
1353:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1314:Sławomir Biały
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1154:
1098:
1096:
1095:
1040:
985:
930:
875:
820:
765:
710:
655:
600:
545:
490:
435:
380:
325:
270:
215:
160:
105:
84:
83:
82:
79:
78:
75:
74:
69:
68:
61:
54:
46:
43:
37:
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3746:
3735:
3732:
3731:
3729:
3720:
3716:
3712:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3705:
3701:
3697:
3693:
3689:
3685:
3680:
3666:
3662:
3658:
3657:RockMagnetist
3654:
3650:
3648:
3644:
3640:
3636:
3632:
3628:
3627:
3626:
3622:
3618:
3617:RockMagnetist
3614:
3610:
3609:
3608:
3607:
3603:
3599:
3595:
3592:
3590:
3586:
3579:
3575:
3573:
3572:
3568:
3564:
3560:
3556:
3548:
3544:
3540:
3536:
3532:
3527:
3526:
3525:
3524:
3520:
3516:
3511:
3507:
3505:
3501:
3493:
3491:
3490:
3486:
3482:
3478:
3472:
3469:
3467:
3466:
3462:
3458:
3454:
3453:Cyclic number
3445:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3429:
3425:
3424:
3423:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3408:
3404:
3402:
3394:
3392:
3391:
3387:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3371:
3370:perfect space
3364:
3363:perfect space
3360:
3358:
3357:
3353:
3349:
3345:
3337:
3335:
3334:
3330:
3326:
3325:FoCuSandLeArN
3322:
3315:
3307:
3304:
3303:
3299:
3297:
3296:
3288:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3273:
3269:
3267:
3266:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3253:
3249:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3239:
3235:
3231:
3227:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3220:
3217:
3216:
3212:
3210:
3209:
3201:
3194:
3190:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3175:
3171:
3170:
3169:
3167:
3163:
3159:
3158:96.57.251.228
3155:
3148:
3141:
3133:
3129:
3125:
3121:
3117:
3116:
3115:
3111:
3107:
3103:
3102:
3101:
3097:
3093:
3088:
3087:
3086:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3070:redirects to
3068:
3063:
3062:Perfect space
3060:redirects to
3059:
3052:
3050:
3049:
3046:
3040:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3029:
3015:
3011:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2989:
2985:
2969:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2928:
2925:
2905:
2902:
2899:
2894:
2891:
2888:
2868:
2865:
2851:
2845:
2842:
2839:
2833:
2826:
2825:
2823:
2798:
2795:
2775:
2772:
2769:
2764:
2761:
2758:
2737:
2734:
2731:
2726:
2723:
2720:
2705:
2699:
2696:
2693:
2687:
2680:
2679:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2663:
2659:
2655:
2654:
2653:
2650:
2647:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2637:
2633:
2615:
2611:
2604:
2582:
2578:
2571:
2562:
2546:
2540:
2537:
2534:
2528:
2525:
2522:
2519:
2513:
2507:
2487:
2484:
2481:
2478:
2475:
2452:
2446:
2426:
2423:
2420:
2417:
2414:
2391:
2385:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2372:
2369:
2364:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2339:
2336:
2334:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2324:FoCuSandLeArN
2321:
2313:
2311:
2310:
2307:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2267:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2237:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2221:
2213:
2211:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2186:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2150:
2146:
2143:
2138:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2110:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2091:
2088:
2086:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2065:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1982:
1979:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1942:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1909:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1863:Beta Features
1862:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1785:
1781:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1694:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1679:
1673:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1655:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1581:
1574:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1536:
1533:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1495:
1492:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1458:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1443:74.192.84.101
1440:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1406:FoCuSandLeArN
1403:
1399:
1391:
1389:
1388:
1385:
1384:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1359:
1351:
1348:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1310:
1306:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:Michael Hardy
1288:
1287:Compact space
1284:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1248:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1215:
1214:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1099:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
990:
986:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:
931:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
876:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
821:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
766:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
711:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
660:
656:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
605:
601:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
550:
546:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
495:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
436:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
275:
271:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
216:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
165:
161:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:
106:
104:
100:
96:
92:
89:
85:Earlier years
81:
80:
77:
76:
72:
67:
62:
60:
55:
53:
48:
47:
41:
36:
35:
27:
23:
19:
3682:
3676:
3598:24.97.221.98
3596:
3593:
3582:
3552:
3512:
3508:
3503:
3497:
3475:
3449:
3410:
3406:
3398:
3367:
3341:
3319:
3301:
3294:
3293:
3286:
3271:
3264:
3263:
3214:
3207:
3206:
3197:
3152:— Preceding
3149:
3145:
3067:Perfect sets
3056:
3043:
3033:
3001:
2998:This article
2646:Arthur Rubin
2560:
2368:Arthur Rubin
2342:
2317:
2303:Arthur Rubin
2294:
2288:
2224:
2217:
2190:
2141:
2094:
2069:
2006:
1985:
1912:
1866:
1809:
1801:
1790:174.30.50.14
1786:
1782:
1778:
1710:174.30.48.85
1706:
1702:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1674:
1671:
1586:174.30.48.85
1582:
1578:
1539:
1498:
1462:
1395:
1379:
1373:
1370:
1364:
1362:
1355:
1260:
1255:
1252:
1233:
1156:
1101:
1042:
987:
932:
877:
822:
767:
712:
657:
602:
593:
547:
492:
437:
382:
327:
272:
217:
162:
107:
103:Sep–Dec 2004
99:Jan–Aug 2004
44:
3515:Matt.mawson
3457:Georgia guy
3374:perfect set
3189:Equilateral
3120:perfect set
3058:Perfect set
3006:Mark viking
2960:EoM article
2291:Paul Conrad
2285:Paul Conrad
2255:Mark viking
2197:unimodality
2142:temporarily
2120:User:Kmhkmh
2050:Anne Delong
2009:Anne Delong
1988:Anne Delong
1964:Anne Delong
1930:Mark viking
1915:Anne Delong
1893:Mark viking
1788:compatible.
1559:Anne Delong
1542:Anne Delong
1518:Anne Delong
1501:Anne Delong
1358:this thread
1285:instead of
3711:User:Linas
3500:hexominoes
3290:. Cheers!
2564:functions
2322:? Thanks!
1404:? Thanks!
1356:Recalling
1264:Gsspradlin
91:Motivation
3684:calculus.
3611:There is
3535:Gandalf61
3432:Gandalf61
3382:Trovatore
3248:LokiClock
3193:Isosceles
3174:LokiClock
3124:Trovatore
3092:Trovatore
2152:anyhow.--
1459:Constants
3728:Category
3688:calculus
3679:calculus
3531:hexomino
3154:unsigned
3064:, while
3030:Math 2.0
2996:Agreed.
2656:Indeed!
2234:contribs
2226:Eastmain
2169:Rschwieb
2105:Rschwieb
2095:I think
1634:I think
1468:constant
24: |
20: |
3348:Brirush
2559:" Note
2187:DrMicro
1697:Isheden
1640:Isheden
1234:15 days
22:Archive
3696:Tkuvho
3413:Naraht
3295:bd2412
3265:bd2412
3208:bd2412
3045:Helder
2984:Quartl
2649:(talk)
2371:(talk)
2349:Quartl
2306:(talk)
2154:Kmhkmh
1847:RDBury
1693:Quartl
1636:Quartl
1622:Quartl
1333:RDBury
1695:and
1435:WP:RS
16:<
3715:talk
3700:talk
3661:talk
3643:talk
3621:talk
3602:talk
3567:talk
3539:talk
3519:talk
3485:talk
3461:talk
3436:talk
3428:here
3417:talk
3386:talk
3380:. --
3352:talk
3329:talk
3287:Done
3252:talk
3234:talk
3191:and
3178:talk
3162:talk
3128:talk
3110:talk
3096:talk
3080:talk
3010:talk
2988:talk
2662:talk
2636:talk
2597:and
2353:talk
2328:talk
2275:talk
2259:talk
2230:talk
2205:talk
2173:talk
2158:talk
2128:talk
2109:talk
2080:talk
2054:talk
2040:talk
2013:talk
1992:talk
1968:talk
1950:talk
1946:Ozob
1934:talk
1919:talk
1897:talk
1882:talk
1872:and
1851:talk
1836:talk
1832:Dmcq
1820:talk
1794:talk
1766:talk
1762:Dmcq
1752:talk
1748:Ozob
1730:talk
1726:Dmcq
1714:talk
1678:Dmcq
1663:talk
1659:Dmcq
1644:talk
1626:talk
1607:talk
1590:talk
1563:talk
1546:talk
1522:talk
1505:talk
1484:talk
1447:talk
1425:talk
1410:talk
1402:this
1400:and
1398:this
1337:talk
1319:talk
1295:talk
1268:talk
1158:2024
1103:2023
1044:2022
989:2021
934:2020
879:2019
824:2018
769:2017
714:2016
659:2015
604:2014
549:2013
494:2012
439:2011
384:2010
329:2009
274:2008
219:2007
164:2006
109:2005
26:2013
2271:JBL
2036:JBL
1822:):
1478:. —
1421:JBL
1382:τlk
1311:.
1207:Dec
1203:Nov
1199:Oct
1195:Sep
1191:Aug
1187:Jul
1183:Jun
1179:May
1175:Apr
1171:Mar
1167:Feb
1163:Jan
1152:Dec
1148:Nov
1144:Oct
1140:Sep
1136:Aug
1132:Jul
1128:Jun
1124:May
1120:Apr
1116:Mar
1112:Feb
1108:Jan
1093:Dec
1089:Nov
1085:Oct
1081:Sep
1077:Aug
1073:Jul
1069:Jun
1065:May
1061:Apr
1057:Mar
1053:Feb
1049:Jan
1038:Dec
1034:Nov
1030:Oct
1026:Sep
1022:Aug
1018:Jul
1014:Jun
1010:May
1006:Apr
1002:Mar
998:Feb
994:Jan
983:Dec
979:Nov
975:Oct
971:Sep
967:Aug
963:Jul
959:Jun
955:May
951:Apr
947:Mar
943:Feb
939:Jan
928:Dec
924:Nov
920:Oct
916:Sep
912:Aug
908:Jul
904:Jun
900:May
896:Apr
892:Mar
888:Feb
884:Jan
873:Dec
869:Nov
865:Oct
861:Sep
857:Aug
853:Jul
849:Jun
845:May
841:Apr
837:Mar
833:Feb
829:Jan
818:Dec
814:Nov
810:Oct
806:Sep
802:Aug
798:Jul
794:Jun
790:May
786:Apr
782:Mar
778:Feb
774:Jan
763:Dec
759:Nov
755:Oct
751:Sep
747:Aug
743:Jul
739:Jun
735:May
731:Apr
727:Mar
723:Feb
719:Jan
708:Dec
704:Nov
700:Oct
696:Sep
692:Aug
688:Jul
684:Jun
680:May
676:Apr
672:Mar
668:Feb
664:Jan
653:Dec
649:Nov
645:Oct
641:Sep
637:Aug
633:Jul
629:Jun
625:May
621:Apr
617:Mar
613:Feb
609:Jan
598:Dec
594:Nov
590:Oct
586:Sep
582:Aug
578:Jul
574:Jun
570:May
566:Apr
562:Mar
558:Feb
554:Jan
543:Dec
539:Nov
535:Oct
531:Sep
527:Aug
523:Jul
519:Jun
515:May
511:Apr
507:Mar
503:Feb
499:Jan
488:Dec
484:Nov
480:Oct
476:Sep
472:Aug
468:Jul
464:Jun
460:May
456:Apr
452:Mar
448:Feb
444:Jan
433:Dec
429:Nov
425:Oct
421:Sep
417:Aug
413:Jul
409:Jun
405:May
401:Apr
397:Mar
393:Feb
389:Jan
378:Dec
374:Nov
370:Oct
366:Sep
362:Aug
358:Jul
354:Jun
350:May
346:Apr
342:Mar
338:Feb
334:Jan
323:Dec
319:Nov
315:Oct
311:Sep
307:Aug
303:Jul
299:Jun
295:May
291:Apr
287:Mar
283:Feb
279:Jan
268:Dec
264:Nov
260:Oct
256:Sep
252:Aug
248:Jul
244:Jun
240:May
236:Apr
232:Mar
228:Feb
224:Jan
213:Dec
209:Nov
205:Oct
201:Sep
197:Aug
193:Jul
189:Jun
185:May
181:Apr
177:Mar
173:Feb
169:Jan
158:Dec
154:Nov
150:Oct
146:Sep
142:Aug
138:Jul
134:Jun
130:May
126:Apr
122:Mar
118:Feb
114:Jan
3730::
3717:)
3702:)
3681::
3663:)
3655:.
3645:)
3623:)
3604:)
3591:.
3587:/
3569:)
3541:)
3533:.
3521:)
3513:--
3487:)
3463:)
3438:)
3430:.
3419:)
3388:)
3354:)
3331:)
3323:.
3254:)
3236:)
3180:)
3164:)
3130:)
3112:)
3098:)
3090:--
3082:)
3012:)
3004:--
2990:)
2903:−
2892:−
2773:−
2762:−
2735:−
2724:−
2664:)
2638:)
2608:↦
2575:↦
2538:−
2526:−
2355:)
2330:)
2277:)
2261:)
2232:•
2207:)
2175:)
2160:)
2130:)
2111:)
2082:)
2056:)
2042:)
2015:)
1994:)
1970:)
1952:)
1936:)
1921:)
1899:)
1884:)
1853:)
1838:)
1796:)
1768:)
1754:)
1732:)
1716:)
1665:)
1646:)
1628:)
1609:)
1592:)
1565:)
1548:)
1524:)
1507:)
1486:)
1449:)
1427:)
1412:)
1363:M∧
1339:)
1321:)
1297:)
1270:)
1205:·
1201:·
1197:·
1193:·
1189:·
1185:·
1181:·
1177:·
1173:·
1169:·
1165:·
1161::
1150:·
1146:·
1142:·
1138:·
1134:·
1130:·
1126:·
1122:·
1118:·
1114:·
1110:·
1106::
1091:·
1087:·
1083:·
1079:·
1075:·
1071:·
1067:·
1063:·
1059:·
1055:·
1051:·
1047::
1036:·
1032:·
1028:·
1024:·
1020:·
1016:·
1012:·
1008:·
1004:·
1000:·
996:·
992::
981:·
977:·
973:·
969:·
965:·
961:·
957:·
953:·
949:·
945:·
941:·
937::
926:·
922:·
918:·
914:·
910:·
906:·
902:·
898:·
894:·
890:·
886:·
882::
871:·
867:·
863:·
859:·
855:·
851:·
847:·
843:·
839:·
835:·
831:·
827::
816:·
812:·
808:·
804:·
800:·
796:·
792:·
788:·
784:·
780:·
776:·
772::
761:·
757:·
753:·
749:·
745:·
741:·
737:·
733:·
729:·
725:·
721:·
717::
706:·
702:·
698:·
694:·
690:·
686:·
682:·
678:·
674:·
670:·
666:·
662::
651:·
647:·
643:·
639:·
635:·
631:·
627:·
623:·
619:·
615:·
611:·
607::
596:·
592:·
588:·
584:·
580:·
576:·
572:·
568:·
564:·
560:·
556:·
552::
541:·
537:·
533:·
529:·
525:·
521:·
517:·
513:·
509:·
505:·
501:·
497::
486:·
482:·
478:·
474:·
470:·
466:·
462:·
458:·
454:·
450:·
446:·
442::
431:·
427:·
423:·
419:·
415:·
411:·
407:·
403:·
399:·
395:·
391:·
387::
376:·
372:·
368:·
364:·
360:·
356:·
352:·
348:·
344:·
340:·
336:·
332::
321:·
317:·
313:·
309:·
305:·
301:·
297:·
293:·
289:·
285:·
281:·
277::
266:·
262:·
258:·
254:·
250:·
246:·
242:·
238:·
234:·
230:·
226:·
222::
211:·
207:·
203:·
199:·
195:·
191:·
187:·
183:·
179:·
175:·
171:·
167::
156:·
152:·
148:·
144:·
140:·
136:·
132:·
128:·
124:·
120:·
116:·
112::
101:·
97:·
93:·
3713:(
3698:(
3659:(
3641:(
3619:(
3600:(
3565:(
3537:(
3517:(
3483:(
3459:(
3434:(
3415:(
3384:(
3350:(
3327:(
3302:T
3272:T
3250:(
3232:(
3215:T
3176:(
3160:(
3126:(
3108:(
3094:(
3078:(
3008:(
2986:(
2970:n
2934:)
2929:K
2926:N
2921:(
2912:)
2906:k
2900:K
2895:n
2889:N
2883:(
2874:)
2869:k
2866:n
2861:(
2852:=
2849:)
2846:k
2843:=
2840:X
2837:(
2834:P
2804:)
2799:K
2796:N
2791:(
2782:)
2776:k
2770:K
2765:n
2759:N
2753:(
2744:)
2738:1
2732:k
2727:1
2721:n
2715:(
2706:=
2703:)
2700:n
2697:=
2694:X
2691:(
2688:P
2660:(
2634:(
2616:a
2612:x
2605:x
2583:x
2579:a
2572:x
2561:n
2547:.
2544:)
2541:1
2535:m
2532:(
2529:G
2523:1
2520:=
2517:)
2514:n
2511:(
2508:F
2488:n
2485:,
2482:M
2479:,
2476:N
2456:)
2453:m
2450:(
2447:G
2427:m
2424:,
2421:M
2418:,
2415:N
2395:)
2392:n
2389:(
2386:F
2351:(
2326:(
2273:(
2257:(
2236:)
2228:(
2203:(
2171:(
2156:(
2126:(
2107:(
2078:(
2052:(
2038:(
2011:(
1990:(
1966:(
1948:(
1932:(
1917:(
1895:(
1880:(
1849:(
1834:(
1818:(
1792:(
1764:(
1750:(
1728:(
1712:(
1661:(
1642:(
1624:(
1605:(
1588:(
1561:(
1544:(
1520:(
1503:(
1482:(
1445:(
1423:(
1408:(
1380:И
1376:ε
1374:ħ
1371:c
1365:Ŝ
1335:(
1317:(
1293:(
1266:(
1242:.
71:)
65:e
58:t
51:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
