Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2006/May

2265:, to a previous verison which is arguably incorrect mathematically and which removes a lot of new material, material for which he has given no argument for removal. He also says, falsely, that my attempt to satisfy his previous criticims amounted to "writing a one-liner" which seems to prove he hasn't even seriously looked at the version he is reverting from. I think we need other people to weigh in at this point. I am very much opposed to simply allowing it to say the real numbers have a number line and calling that a definition. My proposal to say they have a number line, with no "room" to fit additional numbers in, is an attempt to make the one-line introduction correspond to an actual rigorous definition, which will not be the case if we allow Oleg's revert. 6158:(used in developing the theory of 'outer measure'). My question is: do we need a separate page for subadditve set functions, or should we incorporate it into the existing subadditive page? (Or are subadditive set functions not notable and we do not need them?). I might be in a position to write something on the set function version of subadditive (if needed), but would appreciate some views about what might be done - and there are probably others better qualified to write such stuff anyway. 3890:, this means P(A ∩ B)/P(A) = P(B), or P(A ∩ B) = P(A) P(B), in other words: events A and B are independent. Where is the delusion? There is no shortage of delusions, including mathematical ones, and the field of statistics and probability theory is particularly rich, but this doesn't seem to be one of them. Its like having a diatribe against saying that 1 < 2 means that 1 is less than 2, while it means nothing except "1 < 2". To AfD? -- 47: 1274:

blah..." is ok. They also may not understand that sometimes a procedural description should be given, e.g. "take such and such and do such and such...". See my long comment linked above. I would like to know what those who normally work on mathematics articles think about all this, so please drop by those pages and make some comments. --

5344: 5616: 2951:-adic numbers should be written from right to left or from left to right. The article used to use the right-to-left notation, but was recently rewritten with the left-to-right notation. Contributions to the debate from a wider pool of wiki mathematicians would be helpful, to see if we can reach a concensus. 3911:

I find it hard to understand exactly what this guy is ranting about, mainly because of the poor translation of his thoughts (presumably from Russian) into English. His maths seems to be correct, but only seems to show that conditional probability can be different in different situations. If this page

3574:

I think that the problem is more difficult than Lambiam thinks it is. In the section to which I referred, the only blank line was the next to last paragraph. Yet the mismatching of paragraphs began at the first paragraph in the section. Apparently the diff-software cannot measure the similarity of

2593:

This is presumably because TeX does not apply its operator spacing rules in the first case, while since you've forced an empty group in the second, it does. Preferrably if you're continuing a sum onto two lines, one would add a \quad of space in the second or add a text indent (via a ":"), instead of

1546:

I don't mind making the distinction, but I don't think I understand as you've stated it. In "Brouwer FP Theorem," it sounds like an adjective phrase to me (modifying "theorem"). Is this an exception? When would the hyphen be appropriate? Something like "fixed-point set"? That sounds like an adjective

4264:

I s'pose I was thinking consistency would make things easier to find, and any source I found was always self-consistent whereas the Knowledge isn't. And now that I look through the textbooks sitting in front of me, four have "nonnegative" (five American authors) and only one has "non-negative" (two

3590:

section title. This doesn't show up clearly in the diff, but start an edit on both versions and compare the contents of the edit boxes, and it will be obvious. If then the next paragraph is also modified, the diff algorithm can't line them up. The silly thing in this massive edit is that many of the

3311:

You are seeing artifacts of one of the intermediate interpretation passes that mediawiki does during math markup. When all goes well (e.g. properly formed or properly messed up math syntax) you'll either see the math, or some nice error note. If something unexpected happens (e.g. math in links, math

3010:

I have created a new page on fine topology (as in classical potential theory), but as the title "fine topology" already seems to be taken by a page about general topology (i.e. 'finer topology' rather than "THE fine topology"), I have called my page "classical fine topology" - seems like there ought

2917:

I agreed with the deletion because I think that the term "zero-eigenvalue bifurcation" is hardly used by itself (in constract to more complicated phenomena like the "double zero-eigenvalue bifurcation", used as a synonym for "Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation"). But if you want to create a redirect, be my

1564:

discusses some common rules. So why not "Brouwer fixed-point theorem"? I suppose because it's a ritual thing, with "theorem" doing the modifying. Or it's an example of the general guideline that hyphens are for clarity, and if we don't need them we don't use them. The still more general guideline is

4240:

OED lists "non-negative" but Webster's lists "nonnegative". Is this a British/American usage split? I've looked through a few textbooks, but there doesn't seem to be any particular consistency (not all American books use "nonnegative" and not all European ones use "non-negative"). Any opinions?

3317:

As for the suggestion, I think such a thing would overly burden the database and the authors. It sounds like you're suggesting that a new page be created to explain every equation. That's a lot of new pages to store, and a lot to write. That style of writing probably wouldn't be very popular, since

1644:

The traditional usage is still followed by nearly all newspapers and magazines and in novels, and people are accustomed to seeing it. But many educated people, including many authors of scholarly papers and books no longer follow the traditional rule. I've tended to be conservative about it and I

1610:

there's an inconsistency? A fixed-point theorem (with a hyphen) asserts the existence of a fixed point (with no hyphen), and it is completely appropriate to use a hyphen in one case and not in the other, because of the difference in the way the phrase is being used. That is not an inconsistency.

4003:

Probably you are right. Especially it concerns the second section of paper. However the first section without doubts keeps within a well-known encyclopaedic category “Paradoxes in mathematics”. Russian mirror of this paper contains, for example, popular delusions which often meet at discussion on

3556:

For this example it would have helped if the diff algorithm ignored blank lines, that is, tried to match up the two versions after filtering out the blank lines (which should be re-inserted for the final presentation). I suppose there is a backlog of all kinds of wishes for the developers, and I

2243:

which we would like comments on. I added a section which uses a notation which is unusual but not unprecedented, in the section intended to convey the intuitive idea of a p-adic number. It seems to me the notation I used does that more successfully than any alternative for people used to decimal

1742:

or myself are able to attend, but posters can be submitted without having a physical presence. Questions: is anyone here planning to go to wikimania Aug 4-6, in Cambridge MA? Anyone happy to spend some time standing next to a Blahtex poster? For those who don't know Blahtex is a extension which

1532:

Not so fast; there's a grammatical distinction. As a noun phrase, we would write the "fixed point" of a recursive function, without the hyphen. But as an adjective, we often write "fixed-point" thingy, with the hyphen. In the case of theorem names, the former applies, as in "Brouwer fixed point

1273:

My thought is that while some of the pronoun use could be favorably excised, I am definitely starting to get the feeling (especially after examining the articles in question) that these particular editors do not understand the conventions in mathematical writing, e.g. "We consider blah as doing

3509:

Sometimes an editor goes thru an article and changes many minor things at once. For example: spelling corrections; deleting unneccessary spaces; replacing & alpha ; with α; etc.. When this is done, the function which shows changes in the history often fails. It may begin matching an old

3078:

Thanks for that suggestion - I have renamed the page. In a similar vein, I am tempted to write 2-3 articles on the subject of 'thin sets' and 'polar sets' (as used in potential theory, subharmonic functions etc.) and find that these terms also link to pages mainly about set theory. Would it be

3947:

The delusion consists in popular attempts to justify or to prove or to deduce the definition of independence of events: P(AB)=P(A)P(B) from other assumptions. Mathematical definitions do not demand proofs, especially in a preamble to encyclopaedic paper on probability theory. The criticism is

3513:

I think that it is probably impractical to correct this bug in the comparison. So I am suggesting that you-all try to avoid this situation in the first place. When you do such massive edits, please first do every other paragraph (to allow the software to get back in synch with an unalterred

3385:

I don't think this is a good idea, I doubt it will get used by anybody if it gets implemented, and I doubt the developers will ever bother implementing that. You should at least get some support for this feature before you decide to do anything about it. But again, I don't think this wil lead

2638:

Personally, I never noticed this until recently. I once asked Donald Knuth why he had issued an infallible pontifical decree about minute details of the design of the lower-case letter delta. He said it's because the design he prescribed was just obviously the right one. Anyway, in non-TeX

1411:

Well, you live and learn! I tried to carefully explain how the situation appeared to me without being patronizing or rude; I hope you weren't offended. At any rate, I think it's been a very fruitful discussion thus far with a variety of people voicing their thoughts and it's still ongoing!

1814:

Yeah, I feel bad about that; sorry, everyone! (In my defense, though, I did try to explain why the AfD would fail, after which I didn't think Loom91 would actually go through with it.) Well, at least it's attracting some fresh constructive attention, and it'll be useful to have on record.

1470:. To my mind he has a very good writing style, which avoids the problems of overly technical writing, whilst still being technically correct. I fell there is quite a bit which could be learnt by examining how he structures his writing. I think a lot of illustrations help, the sub project 2209:, who then took it upon himself to go around recatting over a hundred articles, then apparently got tired. Unless this was discussed somewhere this doesn't strike me as good behavior; someone should let them know. I don't know if they have any equivalent to WikiProject Mathematics. -- 5970: 5032: 3124:

Sorry if this is the wrong place / its already been suggested (I searched :-\), please direct me to the right place if here is incorrect (or tell me its not a worthwhile idea if you think so). This is a suggestion that when a equation is displayed (for example the one on

4755: 3575:

the contents of two paragraphs until after it has decided irreversably that they are matching paragraphs. That matching of paragraphs appears to depend only on whether they are identical, followed by interpolation (guessing) between identical pairs of paragraphs.

3437:

I think it won't work. A significant obstacle is that mathematical symbols can have many different meanings, and a computer just ain't smart enough to distinguish which one you mean. For example, the + symbol could mean addition, or it could mean the span of two

5038: 3477:

which are domain specific collections of mathematical definitions. There has been numerous papers on the subject, but I don't think its gained much acceptance apart from as a means of converting from one computer algebra system to another. In the wikiworld

4333:

button is a box that says "Insert:", followed by numerous special characters. The character in question is one of them, and clicking on it causes it to be inserted into the edit box. JavaScript must enabled in the browser for this to work.

5847: 5350: 2181:, or perhaps the other way around. It seems that both categories exist and are populated. Would someone whose Spanish is better than mine like to go tell them? I don't know how they handle these things over there; I think things like 1393:

says to use "we" in the active voice. I see now that I was mistaken in thinking it too personal, and yes, I did not understand mathematical writing conventions as pointed out by Chan. I will try to not be an ignoramus in the future.

2639:

mathematical notation, I've been something of a stickler about proper spacing with binary operations and binary relations, thinking all the while that there's no need to think about that in TeX, but in cases like this, there is.

3510:

paragraph to the wrong new paragraph and then it never gets back in synch (until one reaches a section header, if that was not changed). Of course, this makes it very difficult to check that the change was done appropriately.

1264:

on Talk:Knot theory, in response to two editors who complained about the article's tone. One specific complaint was the use of pronouns and that the article sounded like a teachger giving a lesson. Now, I just noticed that

3312:

in image captions, etc) then mediawiki will mysteriously dump out that garbage. Basically, you're causing an error that isn't specifically handled by the markup engine, so it gets confused. It's totally browser-independent.

2658:

I wasn't exactly precise in what I was meaning above -- what I meant is that if one wants to continue a sum on two lines, one should add space to the left somehow, instead of keeping both lines of the sum aligned, for

1940:

OK, I hate machine translation but it has its points. He changed the article to point to a nonexistent article on ja.wiki, called "Commutative field". It's WAREL alright; please block him with all deliberate speed.

1865:. Please review and correct errors, rewrite awkward sentences, simplify, embellish, supply sources, etc. It would further be nice to have some illustrations, both for a continuous density function and a histogram. 4004:“Fermat's last theorem”, “Parallel lines in Lobachevsky's geometry”, “Events with zero probability”. Can be it is necessary to open a new category “Paradoxes in mathematics” into which this paper could enter? - 1788:" for deletion, on the grounds that Knowledge should not contain proofs like this. The archives of sci.math currently show well over a thousand postings related to this topic, which is therefore included in the 5878: 4303:

Most of the references I've seen have a symbol over the "C", which I can't figure out exactly how to generate. (Also, there seems to be a convention that the "-" should be replaced by an n-dash "–".) —

6172:

deserves its own article. I don't know any measure theory, but I recall there being interesting theorems about set functions which are additive (on finite collections of sets) and countably subadditive.

5698: 4826: 3744:

I added a final line to the moment generating function calculation, which should clarify matters further. The variance result looks OK, by computing them in terms of the moment generating function. —

1269:

has been tagged (by someone else) with a "tone" tag, and the talk page mentions for example, that the use of "we" is bad and that it sounds too much like a "math lesson instead of an encyclopedia".

70: 1891: 1793: 6153: 4577: 3971:, is saying. It is not trying to "prove the definition" rather it is simply trying to provide an intuitive understanding of the concept. In any case any criticism of that article belongs at 5339:{\displaystyle =S_{n}-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=0}^{N-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})S_{k}-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=N}^{n-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})s-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=N}^{n-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})(S_{k}-s)} 3473:

formats have had some aspect of representing the meaning of an equation rather that its purely visible representation. OpenMath in particular has seen a lot of work with people developing

3365:

for an example of what I think could be programatically created, and a description of How it could be created without too much fuss. After exams I'll have a go at this if no one else has.

3279: 3190: 4044:

page is now proposed for deletion, although the other sub articles and the category are not. Either it should be all or none and I think AfD might be better than prod in this case. --

1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 843: 839: 835: 824: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 505: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 395: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 274: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 187: 183: 179: 175: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 1560:

You want me to explain why punctuation conventions make sense?! I wish. I can say that I would never hyphenate in a situation like "Every rotation has a fixed point." The article on

6081: 2279:

are encouraged. My version of things is that Gene is convinced enough that he is right that he is prefers repeatedly reverting to his version to discussing things on the talk page.

5753: 3338:

In the page I referenced above, the reason for the equation is explained, but at the level of someone who understands equations already, not to someone who has no idea what the

2031: 2965:

article to consistently use the right-to-left notation, but with a new section that mentions other alternative notations. Any comments on the partial re-write are welcome at

2843:

I probably should have added "and keeping the same indent" to the end of my comment. It's a shame that the TeX system in use here ignores initial spacing via quads and such.

1164: 1109: 1050: 995: 940: 885: 830: 775: 720: 665: 610: 555: 500: 445: 390: 335: 280: 225: 170: 115: 25: 2839: 2745: 2571: 4472: 2477: 63: 2791: 2699: 2523: 2431: 5611:{\displaystyle =S_{n}-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=0}^{N-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})S_{k}-{\frac {b_{n}-b_{N}}{b_{n}}}s-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=N}^{n-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})(S_{k}-s)} 2101:

I'd give it thumbs down, in regard the Δ numbers. That is just wrong, even if referenced in the paper. The rest is more-or-less accurate, although I believe it falis

109: 105: 101: 97: 4814: 4786: 3356: 4469: 6234: 3442:, or the concatenation of two strings, etc. So much depends on context. (Also you probably wanted a forward slash in the title of that page, not a backslash. See 2607:

Sadly, I spotted the difference instantly, and even knew exactly where to look. This has been with TeX for decades, and Knuth explicitly calls attention to it in

21: 6201:

is from a fan, it seems. Important guy for mathematical physics, and this should be better expressed and sourced, and have more technical stuff about the work.

56: 3850:

lists ten references, all by the same author, including some papers in good Russian journals so we might want to keep the article even though it violates the

3358:

means. I thought it would make wikipedia more accessible to non maths experts and require the time of one developer (and not the time of every maths editor).

4027:

Yes AfD unless its moved to a different name and cleaned up to be less like Orignial Research, give it a bit of time though the page is less than a day old.

3318:

most of us are used to explaining equations in neighboring text. Plus, it would be quite a large programming task to add that functionality into mediawiki.

4280:

In my experience, in American papers and textbooks "nonnegative" is by far the most common. Older works may use "non-negative" to a greater frequency. --

3654:

The problem is apparently caused by a feature of AWB, "Apply general fixes", which removes "excess white space" to which the diff algorithm is sensitive (

5817: 1547:

phrase to me, but I never write it that way myself. Come to think of it, I don't ever use the dash regardless of context. (Except when I have to link to

6087:

in the category measure theory. There seems to be a different definition of 'subadditive' (and also 'countably subadditive') in use in measure theory:

4105:, If we are to believe the references there, it isn't OR, although it may be non-notable. So I agree with Jitse's, I'm not sure we should delete this. 1471: 5793:

Voted for it on the AID page. One user commented that it is in the top ten most viewed pages on Knowledge and therefore must be a featured article.--

4209: 2143: 1930:. I don't read Japanese so I can't tell if the change is correct, but it's exactly the type of change we might expect from WAREL if he came back. -- 1376:

preferred; just the opposite. Overuse of "one" also makes reading drag. Technical writing has a tradition of such conventions, not to its credit. --

3014: 17: 3912:

is to be kept, it surely needs a different title? (and a lot of work on wording) I cannot believe that this really is a *widespread* delusion

3489:(Keep it simple stupid) and this sort of system gets rather complex. Hopefully all the relevant terms should be linked in the text anyway. -- 1213: 1209: 1205: 5965:{\displaystyle \operatorname {sinc} \,x={\frac {\sin x}{x}}\quad {\mbox{or}}\quad \operatorname {sinc} \,x={\frac {\sin \pi x}{\pi x}}.} 5776: 4064:

If the page is to be kept, it should probably be renamed -- "delusions" is not quite neutral, perhaps "misconceptions" would be better.

3827:. At the moment, the article lists only one delusion, and I am not sure what the delusion actually is, but it has something to do with 4506: 3617: 2007: 5027:{\displaystyle S_{n}-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=0}^{N-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})S_{k}-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=N}^{n-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})S_{k}} 3624:

where there are currently 93 bugs related to the diff. In this case the edit summary gives some clue, the edits were done using the

6187: 6162: 5839: 1797: 3129:) the user can click on the equation and is taken to a special page that explains the contents of the equation and what it means. 3050: 3026: 5633: 3628:

tool, they are mainly minor edits and it would be hard to break this up into smaller edits, by limitations of the software. --

2989: 2615: 4412: 4385: 4377: 4356: 3948:

directed only on style of a preamble. All other sections of paper “Statistical” are quite correct. Thanks for discussion. -

4750:{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=0}^{n}b_{k}x_{k}=S_{n}-{\frac {1}{b_{n}}}\sum _{k=0}^{n-1}(b_{k+1}-b_{k})S_{k},} 3972: 3717: 1989: 1548: 1785: 6219: 6205: 6177: 6004: 5992: 5858: 5843: 5828: 5813: 5797: 5787: 5760: 5746: 5721: 5704: 4562: 4534: 4519: 4497: 4479: 4462: 4429: 4419: 4405: 4392: 4371: 4338: 4322: 4312: 4287: 4269: 4255: 4245: 4229: 4216: 4193: 4172: 4156: 4141: 4129: 4112: 4096: 4087: 4068: 4053: 4008: 3982: 3952: 3938: 3916: 3898: 3873: 3863: 3832: 3824: 3810: 3765: 3753: 3739: 3729: 3706: 3666: 3637: 3599: 3579: 3565: 3550: 3528: 3518: 3498: 3450: 3416: 3395: 3372: 3322: 3304: 3113: 3083: 3072: 3042: 3000: 2973: 2955: 2927: 2908: 2898: 2876: 2847: 2653: 2643: 2630: 2598: 2587: 2380: 2346: 2301: 2288: 2269: 2248: 2222: 2213: 2195: 2155: 2135: 2124: 2095: 2056: 2038: 2016: 1996: 1975: 1945: 1934: 1916: 1902: 1873: 1847: 1829: 1819: 1808: 1767: 1719: 1705: 1657: 1615: 1594: 1573: 1555: 1541: 1527: 1508: 1483: 1440: 1419: 1398: 1380: 1359: 1346:

is used to indicate the opinion of the authors. In wikipedia such subjective statements need appropriate qualification

1320: 1311: 1298: 1281: 6093: 4381: 4352: 3851: 3465:

Intriguing idea, but I don't think its right for wikipedia. There have been some development along similar ideas both

3335:

by a computer. It will be a bit of work by someone to make it function, but I thought I'd put it out there as an idea.

2072: 1245: 2649:

Dysprosia: How does a text indent via an initial colon achieve this result? It only adds space to the LEFT of "+".

1964: 1880: 6169: 5984: 1796:. Caution: This topic (and perhaps this vote) attracts, um, non-standard thinkers, to put it delicately. (See the 4083: 3725: 3655: 3391: 3362: 3038: 2985: 2889: 2882: 2333: 2284: 2167: 31: 5980: 2371: 1590:

fixed points: a more distant relationship, analogous to the difference between mathematics and metamathematics.

1501: 1224: 5988: 3968: 3883: 3836: 3828: 3098: 3094: 3062: 1734:

is fast approaching. I think it would be really good if we could have some presence there as a step to getting

3238: 3149: 3079:

sensible to call my new pages 'thin sets (potential theory)' etc. What do more experienced wikipedians think?

1792:; yet it appears that Knowledge covers the topic far better. Those who are interested can register an opinion 1578:

My usage would be like KSmrq's. The underlying reason may be that a "fixed-point set" is a set which consists

4388:, but it won't let me move it because the redirect is to a different place. I'll tag the redir for speedy. -- 2178: 5714: 3887: 2621:"An extra ‘{}’ was typed on the second line here so that TeX would know that the ‘+’ is a binary operation." 1534: 5735: 2206: 2202: 2174: 6000: 4530: 4493: 4309: 3859: 3795: 3750: 3535: 2923: 2618:, p. 196). You'd never guess he was the type to pay extraordinary attention to detail, now would you? ;-D 2218:

On second thought, I suppose someone will notice, as the recats will surely show up on some watchlists. --

2151: 2121: 2027: 1711:

A fixed point theorem is a point theorem that was found to contain an error, which now has been repaired.

6021: 4075: 6202: 6184: 4559: 4516: 4459: 4226: 4169: 4138: 4109: 3979: 3935: 2905: 1913: 1295: 4241:

There seems to be a mix among Knowledge articles (even within a single article) and titles. Thanks.

4078:

is too keep them all in one place. I agree that an AfD vote on all of them could be the things to do.

4208:

is listed somewhere as a missing link, but when I look at 'what links here', I only find things like

4189: 4079: 4049: 3721: 3633: 3591:

changes have no substance and consist of replacing two spaces after a full stop by a single space. --

3494: 3387: 3034: 3022: 2873: 2298: 2280: 2266: 2258: 2245: 1763: 1646: 1479: 1355: 3690:. It's mostly about style; how much information is too much, whether material looks good or fits. 3331:

Ahh no I meant something automatically generated. By definition a mathmatical equation is exact and

1958: 4511: 4454: 2367: 2357: 2297:

I think you need to take your own advice; your reckless reversion was done without any discussion.

2049: 1437: 1395: 4569: 4546: 4445: 3967:

Helgus: I think you misunderstand what the lead section (what you are calling the "preamble") of

3807: 3777:

th cumulant of the compound Poisson distribution, following the notation now in the article, is λ

3762: 3544:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Constructible_universe&diff=53858793&oldid=53818751

3479: 3301: 2966: 2944: 2799: 2705: 2650: 2640: 2584: 2531: 2240: 1789: 1702: 1654: 1612: 1500:

Several articles are named inconsistently. I prefer "fixed point". Any opinions? Post here or at

1460: 1230: 5809: 4181: 4102: 4092:

It really is OR and a rant. The title reads pretty bad as well, it probably should be deleted.--

4041: 3869:

0.999... ≠ 1 must be pretty widespread. And misconceptions about infinity are pretty common. -

3847: 3843: 2131:

Referencing something from 2004 makes it a bit young and possibly fails "established research".

3785:

moment of the distribution of the random variable that the article (in its present form) calls

2439: 1954: 1307:

I believe the passive is the preferred thingy. "We consider..." becomes "... is considered". --

5996: 5854: 5824: 5794: 5783: 5757: 5743: 4526: 4489: 4305: 4093: 3894: 3886:

appears to me to be an informal way of saying P(B|A) = P(B). Using the standard definition of

3855: 3746: 3662: 3595: 3561: 3443: 3109: 2996: 2919: 2756: 2664: 2612: 2488: 2396: 2147: 2117: 1993: 1909: 1898: 1869: 1862: 1855: 1715: 1523: 2108:

As for hyperexponentials, my first paper (in 1966) references an earlier paper by Donner and

6084: 4223: 4166: 4135: 4106: 3976: 3932: 2865: 2861: 2315: 2276: 1261: 1228: 1226: 46: 4165:

Yes writing about your own work is problematic. And we should take special notice of such.

6159: 4792: 4764: 4449: 4252: 4213: 4185: 4045: 3913: 3699: 3629: 3490: 3341: 3080: 3069: 3018: 2113: 2066: 1840: 1759: 1591: 1586:

a fixed point, if you're doing category theory); but a "fixed point theorem" is a theorem

1475: 1351: 3882:

I can't make much sense out of this rant. The "intuitive" meaning offered in the article

2892:? It is proposed for deletion, but it do find some uses of this term on google scholar. — 3093:, so it might be better to turn this into a disambiguation page rather than redirect to 4476: 4426: 4416: 4402: 4389: 4251:

I use either when the mood strikes me. If there's no standard, what's the difference?

4205: 4149: 4065: 3870: 3703: 3576: 3547: 3525: 3515: 3486: 3413: 3369: 2970: 2952: 2869: 2844: 2595: 2219: 2210: 2192: 2132: 2076: 2053: 1972: 1942: 1931: 1474:

has reciently been set up to try to improve the illustrations of the maths articles. --

5995:

whether this is the proper way to go about it, and I'm solliciting others to join. --

3534:

The most recent occassion on which this happened to me was in the 18 May 2006 edit of

3514:

paragraph). Then do a separate edit to change the remaining paragraphs. Thank you.

1468: 6228: 6174: 5976: 5869: 5739: 5701: 4441: 4368: 4319: 4284: 4153: 4126: 3702:

are going. We seem not to see eye-to-eye. I would like to get some more opinions. -

3625: 3557:

don't know how important this really is, but it is relatively simple to implement. --

3447: 3319: 3090: 2962: 2327: 2236: 1826: 1816: 1781: 1739: 1552: 1505: 1464: 1416: 1278: 3698:

for a much longer revision that I reverted. I am pessimistic with how talks on the

5851: 5821: 5780: 4125:

Oleg Vorob'ov, the author of 10 out of 11 of the references. Sounds like OR to me.

3928: 3891: 3659: 3592: 3558: 3439: 3106: 2993: 2894: 2376: 2185: 2012: 1895: 1866: 1712: 1519: 1565:

to tread carefully in this territory, and don't rush to accuse anyone of doing it

4134:

No, OR means writing about something which has not yet been published elsewhere.

6212: 6198: 6015: 5772: 4568:

I think the statement is true as is stands, but I don't have a reference. Using

4119: 4005: 3949: 2262: 2102: 2035: 1777: 1649:(with a hyphen) and have done the same with various other articles. I think in 1390: 1308: 1266: 3126: 6216: 5718: 4335: 4266: 4242: 3736: 3687: 3680: 3066: 2627: 2363: 2062: 1844: 1805: 1731: 1645:

moved the Knowledge article titled "light emitting diode" (with no hyphen) to

1570: 1538: 1377: 5626:, which cancels with the third term. The second term goes to zero. Since the 2580:

code, and guess how and—perhaps more subtly—why the difference was achieved.

1839:, with overwhelming support and complaints about the nomination as violating 2339: 2092: 1755: 1569:

just because their choice is not yours. (But you knew that already, yes?) --

1317: 3716:

Probabilists out there, I wonder if you could answer a question posted at

1825:

By the way, in case anyone hasn't seen it yet, the AfD closed with a keep.

1735: 1637:

A man-eating shark (with a hyphen) scares people away from beaches, whereas

4212:. I could write a page about the Lebesgue spine, but would it be any use? 3694:

shows the difference between the two users preferred revisions. See also

1890:

of "mathematical formulas"? (I wonder what the morphisms would be.) Visit

1640:

A man eating shark (with no hyphen) is a customer is a seafood restaurant.

4281: 3470: 3146: 3102: 2321: 2088: 1413: 1275: 2904:

The deletion, rather than redirection, seems summary and not necessary.

4549:? This has been bothering me, mainly in case absolute convergence of Σ 4360: 2583:

I think perhaps this should be borne in mind in editing math articles.

4074:

The eventology pages look suspicious to me. The only reason I created

1653:

cases, the hyphen is a magnificently efficient disambiguation device.

1436:

No, no offense taken. This has been very instructive to me. Thanks! --

3524:

I think you'll need to provide a concrete example of this happening.

3466: 2961:

Okay, after some discussion on its talk page, I have now changed the

2109: 1748: 1664: 1630: 1561: 3485:

Why its not right for Knowledge: basically the wiki concept follows

3056:{{dablink|] redirects here. For the use in potential theory, see ]}} 2872:

are "complex extensions"; in fact, they are all real closed fields.

3842:

The user who created the article has also written some articles on

3735:

looks right to me. (and the changes i made were mostly cosmetic.)

3482:

is a wikipedia extension which allows some form of semantic markup.

4152:. Not surefire grounds for deletion, but it gives me the willies. 3546:

and scroll down to the section named "L is absolute and minimal".

2626:

The difference is a consequence of the operator handling rules. --

1744: 2314:

Regardless of who did what, there is a discussion running at the

4364: 2984:

I propose to delete the bits about Moore closure in the article

3033:(Copied from my talk page, I don't have a good answer to this. 2577: 1751: 1518:

more common in the literature, so we should stick with that.--

1231: 40: 4204:

Being a newcomer here, I would appreciate some brief advice:

1892:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Mathematical Formulas

1754:

markup which allows for improved rendering of mathematics in

4452:. I think it is notable, but as the author, I may be biased. 1372:

I've responded where requested; see for details. Passive is

4401:

OK, fixed now. This time the endash thing came in handy. --

3120:

Idea: when user clicks on an equation wikipedia explains it

1886:

Should this be kept, deleted, merged, or should there be a

5693:{\displaystyle \epsilon (b_{n}-b_{N})/b_{n}\leq \epsilon } 3505:

Massive edits foil comparison operation in article history

2239:, and what would be appropriate to use, on the talk page 5975:

One possible way to handle this is to split the article

4788:

are the partial sums of the x's. Pick any epsilon : -->

3846:, a theory which I haven't heard about. The article on 3695: 3691: 3543: 3097:, thereby avoiding an awkward disambiguation phrase in 1968: 1928: 1348:

most mathematicians consider 4D knots to be very boring

1316:

But then... "is considered", er, by whom? By a deity? (

5914: 5767:

Mathematics is Article Improvement Drive collaboration

2261:

seems to me to be engaging in abusive reverts on this

6096: 6024: 5881: 5834:

Delusions in probability theory and statistics on AfD

5636: 5353: 5041: 4829: 4795: 4767: 4580: 3823:

I'd like to hear some opinions about the new article

3344: 3241: 3152: 2802: 2759: 2708: 2667: 2534: 2491: 2442: 2399: 1738:

integrated into the main encyclopedia sites. Neither

5771:

Ladies and Gentlemen! Did you know that the article

5630:

sequence is increasing, the last term is bounded by

2235:

There is a discussion on decimal-style notation for

2032:

wikipedia:Articles requested for more than two years

1674:

semantic changes caused by the placement of hyphens:

3621: 3291:

When I click on it, it takes me to the right place.

1688:, meaning a disease that causes poor nutrition, and 6147: 6075: 5964: 5692: 5610: 5338: 5026: 4808: 4780: 4749: 3350: 3273: 3184: 2833: 2785: 2739: 2693: 2565: 2517: 2471: 2425: 6148:{\displaystyle \mu (E\cup F)\leq \mu (E)+\mu (F)} 3214:UNIQ5f19c7bc44ccc704-math2f6e29f1133d184200000001 3006:Fine topology (suggestion needed for better name) 2390:See if you can spot the difference between this: 2026:Is there anybody here interested in tackling the 1992:, your contributions would be most appreciated.-- 32:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive 13 1338:and the prounoun can easily be dropped. However 5713:Now transcribed to that controversial category 3586:Blank lines were removed in the edit following 5840:Delusions in probability theory and statistics 3839:. Can somebody make sense of the new article? 3806:= 2 are just what now appears in the article. 1326:This reflects a certain diference about using 6183:Be bold! Write stuff, we move and fix later. 5622:Let n go to infinity. The first term goes to 4380:is my fault; don't really remember doing it. 3686:I find myself in a revert war at the article 2173:An anon recently changed the Spanish link to 2116:. I doubt the primacy of the 1987 paper. — 1908:As far as I can see, the chemists don't need 1694:, meaning poor nutrition that causes disease. 1239:This page has archives. Sections older than 64: 8: 2990:Talk:Kuratowski closure axioms#Moore closure 2860:On this page there is a box telling us that 1342:are subjective statments and in a paper the 6083:, and there is a link to this article from 5868:There are two possible definitions of the 4545:Does anyone have a reference or proof for 1835:That's a understatement; it closed with a 1256:"Tone", pronoun use, etc. in math articles 71: 57: 6095: 6023: 5933: 5913: 5893: 5880: 5730:Indiscriminate collection of information? 5678: 5669: 5660: 5647: 5635: 5593: 5577: 5558: 5539: 5528: 5516: 5507: 5493: 5482: 5469: 5462: 5453: 5440: 5421: 5402: 5391: 5379: 5370: 5361: 5352: 5321: 5305: 5286: 5267: 5256: 5244: 5235: 5220: 5201: 5182: 5171: 5159: 5150: 5141: 5128: 5109: 5090: 5079: 5067: 5058: 5049: 5040: 5018: 5005: 4986: 4967: 4956: 4944: 4935: 4926: 4913: 4894: 4875: 4864: 4852: 4843: 4834: 4828: 4800: 4794: 4772: 4766: 4738: 4725: 4706: 4687: 4676: 4664: 4655: 4646: 4633: 4623: 4613: 4602: 4590: 4581: 4579: 3343: 3274:{\displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }1\,dx.} 3251: 3246: 3240: 3185:{\displaystyle \int _{0}^{\infty }1\,dx.} 3162: 3157: 3151: 2803: 2801: 2758: 2709: 2707: 2666: 2535: 2533: 2490: 2441: 2398: 2112:which discusses hyperexponentials on the 1514:It's my experience that "fixed point" is 4363:points to neither, and probably we need 4210:Knowledge:Missing science topics/Maths16 4148:You're right- sorry, I confused it with 2318:now. Please engage yourselves there. -- 2144:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Zeration 2010:that might interest a few people here. — 5925: 5885: 3656:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser#"Set options" 3540:clean up +spelling correction using AWB 3260: 3171: 2829: 2781: 2735: 2689: 2561: 2513: 2467: 2421: 1912:. We might not need it either, though. 95: 4329:When I open an edit window, below the 1496:Naming: "fixed-point" vs "fixed point" 1459:I've just come across a great book on 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics 6235:WikiProject Mathematics archives/2006 6018:which discusses functions satisfying 6010:Possible confusion over 'subadditive' 3927:Whatever else it it is, it is surely 3011:to be a better solution - any ideas? 7: 6076:{\displaystyle f(x+y)\leq f(x)+f(y)} 5756:, your input would be appreciated.-- 2374:. Please comment at the talk page. — 1290:is pretty much mathematical jargon; 4488:Too late now ... I closed them. -- 2191:are set up language-by-language. -- 4507:Australian Mathematics Competition 4184:, but not sub-pages now on AfD. -- 3618:Knowledge:Village pump (technical) 3252: 3163: 1988:Just created the page on Stewart, 1294:is better for the general reader. 52:WikiProject Mathematics archives ( 39: 5993:Talk:Sinc function (unnormalized) 5844:Widespread mathematical delusions 5814:Widespread mathematical delusions 4525:Also closed as a speedy keep. -- 3833:Widespread mathematical delusions 3825:Widespread mathematical delusions 3819:Widespread mathematical delusions 3712:Compound Poisson process question 1243:may be automatically archived by 5991:. We are having a discussion on 3616:You may want to mention this on 3051:Fine topology (potential theory) 45: 5864:Disambiguation of sinc function 4821:N. Then the right hand side is 4376:Hm, apparently the redirect at 4101:I've removed the prod tag from 3835:criticizes the lead section of 2205:was created just today, by one 1894:and contribute your two cents. 1260:The other day, I left a pretty 6142: 6136: 6127: 6121: 6112: 6100: 6070: 6064: 6055: 6049: 6040: 6028: 5666: 5640: 5605: 5586: 5583: 5551: 5446: 5414: 5333: 5314: 5311: 5279: 5226: 5194: 5134: 5102: 5011: 4979: 4919: 4887: 4731: 4699: 4425:Added. Hey, you never know. -- 2856:Math error right on this page? 1692:Disease-causing poor nutrition 1686:Disease causing poor nutrition 1: 5920: 5911: 4468:I'm a hair away from closing 3973:talk:Statistical independence 3794:. This can be shown via the 3718:Talk:Compound Poisson process 2888:Could someone take a look at 2006:There is a discussion at the 1990:James Stewart (mathematician) 1881:List of Mathematical Formulas 1549:Lefschetz fixed-point theorem 1334:it can easily be rewitten as 6170:subadditive (measure theory) 5985:sinc function (unnormalized) 3975:not in some other article. 3225:What I "should" see is this: 2834:{\displaystyle {}+e+f+g+h\,} 2740:{\displaystyle {}+e+f+g+h\,} 2566:{\displaystyle {}+e+f+g+h\,} 2207:es:Usuario:Ingenioso Hidalgo 1786:Proof that 0.999... equals 1 1336:a knot can be deformed in 4D 5838:I've nominated the article 4413:Štone-Cech compactification 4386:Stone-Čech compactification 4382:Stone-Cech compactification 4378:Stone-Čech compactification 4357:Stone-Čech compactification 4353:Stone-Cech compactification 4297:Stone-Cech compactification 4236:Non-negative v. nonnegative 3852:Knowledge:Vanity guidelines 3363:User:RickiRich\Math_Example 3300:Is this browser-dependent? 3203:Weird! What I see is this: 2943:A debate is in progress at 2890:zero-eigenvalue bifurcation 2883:Zero-eigenvalue bifurcation 1502:Category talk: Fixed points 6251: 6009: 5981:sinc function (normalized) 2472:{\displaystyle +e+f+g+h\,} 2372:Middle-Eastern mathematics 2087:Can someone please review 1773:Bogus AfD of proof article 1662:Nice example, copied from 1533:theorem". And what about " 1332:We can deform a knot in 4D 5777:Article Improvement Drive 5722:01:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 4505:well, mathguru, Afd' the 4222:Sure it would be useful. 2986:Kuratowski closure axioms 2786:{\displaystyle a+b+c+d\,} 2694:{\displaystyle a+b+c+d\,} 2594:relying on empty groups. 2518:{\displaystyle a+b+c+d\,} 2426:{\displaystyle a+b+c+d\,} 2168:Category talk:Mathematics 2166:I wrote the following on 1537:"? It should redirect. -- 6220:18:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC) 6206:11:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 6188:11:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 6178:11:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 6163:11:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 6005:05:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 5859:22:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC) 5829:13:21, 28 May 2006 (UTC) 5798:23:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 5788:22:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 5761:02:36, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 5747:02:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 5705:13:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4563:13:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4535:08:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 4520:08:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC) 4498:12:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4480:10:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4463:06:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4430:22:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4420:04:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4406:03:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4393:03:05, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4372:02:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4339:03:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4323:02:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4313:00:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4288:01:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 4270:23:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4256:22:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4246:22:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4230:02:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4217:20:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4194:10:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC) 4173:17:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4157:02:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4142:02:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4130:02:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 4113:18:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4097:17:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4088:15:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4069:13:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4054:12:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 4009:21:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3983:15:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3969:Statistical independence 3953:12:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3939:11:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3917:11:46, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3899:11:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3884:Statistical independence 3874:06:58, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3864:05:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC) 3837:statistical independence 3829:statistical independence 3811:21:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 3766:21:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 3754:20:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 3740:19:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 3730:17:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 3707:04:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 3679:resolve a revert war at 3667:10:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 3638:07:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 3600:10:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC) 3580:07:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 3566:18:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 3551:09:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC) 3529:09:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 3519:06:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 3499:22:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 3451:21:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC) 3417:06:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 3396:04:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 3373:01:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 3323:02:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 3305:01:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 3114:11:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC) 3099:Comparison of topologies 3095:Comparison of topologies 3084:10:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC) 3073:23:43, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 3063:Comparison of topologies 3043:23:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 3001:09:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 2974:09:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 2956:08:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 2928:13:07, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 2909:11:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC) 2899:00:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 2877:04:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2848:08:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC) 2654:23:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2644:23:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2631:04:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2599:03:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2588:02:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2381:02:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 2347:23:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2302:23:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2289:22:51, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2270:22:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2249:21:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2223:15:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2214:15:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2196:14:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2179:es:Categoría:Matemáticas 2156:08:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2136:08:44, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2125:04:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2096:03:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2057:02:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC) 2039:15:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 2017:01:09, 12 May 2006 (UTC) 1997:09:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC) 1976:17:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1946:15:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1935:15:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC) 1730:The poster deadline for 1467:which can be downloaded 5987:, similar to the usual 5812:(by the same author as 5734:Don't pages like this, 5715:Category:Article proofs 4367:as a redirect as well. 3888:conditional probability 3831:. In fact, the article 3773:... and generally, the 3480:meta:Semantic MediaWiki 2576:without looking at the 2203:es:Categoría:Matemática 2175:es:Categoría:Matemática 1917:19:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC) 1903:21:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1874:20:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1848:22:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1830:22:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1820:20:09, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1809:10:31, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1768:10:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1758:with moder browsers. -- 1720:21:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC) 1706:20:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1658:20:14, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1629:conventions concerning 1616:20:09, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1595:18:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC) 1574:02:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1556:23:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1542:22:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1535:Kleene fixpoint theorem 1528:22:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1509:21:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1484:09:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1441:21:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1420:08:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1399:03:57, 2 May 2006 (UTC) 1381:19:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1360:19:04, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1321:15:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1312:14:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1299:11:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 1282:03:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC) 6168:I think you're right, 6149: 6077: 5989:disambiguation process 5966: 5818:nominated for deletion 5694: 5612: 5550: 5413: 5340: 5278: 5193: 5101: 5028: 4978: 4886: 4810: 4782: 4751: 4698: 4618: 4558:ought to be included. 4318:How about this: Čech? 3796:law of total cumulance 3536:Constructible universe 3352: 3275: 3186: 2939:-adic numbers notation 2835: 2787: 2741: 2695: 2567: 2519: 2473: 2427: 2386:A typesetting subtlety 2142:Duly sent to AfD, see 2028:Koszul-Tate derivation 1861:I rewrote the article 1800:archives for examples 1330:. In a statement like 1246:Lowercase sigmabot III 6150: 6078: 5967: 5736:Derivative (examples) 5695: 5613: 5524: 5387: 5341: 5252: 5167: 5075: 5029: 4952: 4860: 4811: 4809:{\displaystyle S_{k}} 4783: 4781:{\displaystyle S_{k}} 4752: 4672: 4598: 4351:What a mess. We have 3761:Looks OK to me, too. 3353: 3351:{\displaystyle \sum } 3276: 3187: 3017:comment was added by 2836: 2788: 2742: 2696: 2568: 2520: 2474: 2428: 2366:has proposed to move 2030:topic listed on the " 1726:Blahtex and wikimania 6094: 6022: 6014:There is an article 5879: 5634: 5351: 5039: 4827: 4816:is epsilon-close to 4793: 4789:0, choose N so that 4765: 4578: 3342: 3239: 3150: 2800: 2757: 2706: 2665: 2532: 2489: 2440: 2397: 2259:User:Oleg Alexandrov 1647:light-emitting diode 6193:Barry Simon article 4384:should be moved to 4076:Category:Eventology 3538:by UkPaolo, called 3475:Content Directories 3256: 3167: 3101:. Nothing links to 2368:Islamic mathematics 2358:Islamic mathematics 2050:Field (mathematics) 1780:has been goaded by 6211:A good example of 6145: 6073: 5962: 5926: 5921: 5918: 5912: 5886: 5690: 5608: 5336: 5024: 4806: 4778: 4747: 4570:summation by parts 4446:Quasi-Hopf algebra 3348: 3271: 3261: 3242: 3182: 3172: 3153: 2967:Talk:P-adic number 2945:Talk:P-adic number 2831: 2830: 2783: 2782: 2737: 2736: 2691: 2690: 2563: 2562: 2515: 2514: 2469: 2468: 2423: 2422: 2241:Talk:P-adic number 1461:Algebraic topology 5957: 5917: 5909: 5856: 5826: 5785: 5779:collaboration? -- 5754:put it up for afd 5522: 5499: 5385: 5250: 5165: 5073: 4950: 4858: 4670: 4596: 4547:Kronecker's lemma 3896: 3664: 3597: 3563: 3444:Knowledge:Subpage 3135:OK, let's try it: 3111: 3089:Nothing links to 3030: 2998: 2866:superreal numbers 2862:hyperreal numbers 2048:is back again at 1910:Category:Formulas 1900: 1871: 1863:Mode (statistics) 1856:Mode (statistics) 1784:into nominating " 1717: 1621:hyphens generally 1582:fixed points (or 1262:extensive comment 1253: 1252: 102:Nov 2002–Dec 2003 30:(Redirected from 6242: 6203:Charles Matthews 6185:Charles Matthews 6154: 6152: 6151: 6146: 6085:Sigma additivity 6082: 6080: 6079: 6074: 5971: 5969: 5968: 5963: 5958: 5956: 5948: 5934: 5919: 5915: 5910: 5905: 5894: 5855: 5842:(earlier called 5825: 5784: 5699: 5697: 5696: 5691: 5683: 5682: 5673: 5665: 5664: 5652: 5651: 5617: 5615: 5614: 5609: 5598: 5597: 5582: 5581: 5569: 5568: 5549: 5538: 5523: 5521: 5520: 5508: 5500: 5498: 5497: 5488: 5487: 5486: 5474: 5473: 5463: 5458: 5457: 5445: 5444: 5432: 5431: 5412: 5401: 5386: 5384: 5383: 5371: 5366: 5365: 5345: 5343: 5342: 5337: 5326: 5325: 5310: 5309: 5297: 5296: 5277: 5266: 5251: 5249: 5248: 5236: 5225: 5224: 5212: 5211: 5192: 5181: 5166: 5164: 5163: 5151: 5146: 5145: 5133: 5132: 5120: 5119: 5100: 5089: 5074: 5072: 5071: 5059: 5054: 5053: 5033: 5031: 5030: 5025: 5023: 5022: 5010: 5009: 4997: 4996: 4977: 4966: 4951: 4949: 4948: 4936: 4931: 4930: 4918: 4917: 4905: 4904: 4885: 4874: 4859: 4857: 4856: 4844: 4839: 4838: 4815: 4813: 4812: 4807: 4805: 4804: 4787: 4785: 4784: 4779: 4777: 4776: 4756: 4754: 4753: 4748: 4743: 4742: 4730: 4729: 4717: 4716: 4697: 4686: 4671: 4669: 4668: 4656: 4651: 4650: 4638: 4637: 4628: 4627: 4617: 4612: 4597: 4595: 4594: 4582: 4560:Charles Matthews 4517:Have your say!!! 4460:Have your say!!! 3895: 3696:this old version 3663: 3596: 3562: 3412:What Oleg said. 3357: 3355: 3354: 3349: 3280: 3278: 3277: 3272: 3255: 3250: 3191: 3189: 3188: 3183: 3166: 3161: 3110: 3012: 2997: 2906:Charles Matthews 2840: 2838: 2837: 2832: 2804: 2792: 2790: 2789: 2784: 2746: 2744: 2743: 2738: 2710: 2700: 2698: 2697: 2692: 2572: 2570: 2569: 2564: 2536: 2524: 2522: 2521: 2516: 2478: 2476: 2475: 2470: 2432: 2430: 2429: 2424: 2342: 2336: 2330: 2324: 2277:talk:real number 2190: 2184: 2170:; copying here. 2162:Spanish category 2034:"? Thank you. — 1914:Charles Matthews 1899: 1870: 1716: 1296:Charles Matthews 1248: 1232: 73: 66: 59: 49: 41: 35: 6250: 6249: 6245: 6244: 6243: 6241: 6240: 6239: 6225: 6224: 6195: 6092: 6091: 6020: 6019: 6012: 5949: 5935: 5895: 5877: 5876: 5866: 5836: 5806: 5775:is the current 5769: 5732: 5674: 5656: 5643: 5632: 5631: 5589: 5573: 5554: 5512: 5489: 5478: 5465: 5464: 5449: 5436: 5417: 5375: 5357: 5349: 5348: 5317: 5301: 5282: 5240: 5216: 5197: 5155: 5137: 5124: 5105: 5063: 5045: 5037: 5036: 5014: 5001: 4982: 4940: 4922: 4909: 4890: 4848: 4830: 4825: 4824: 4796: 4791: 4790: 4768: 4763: 4762: 4734: 4721: 4702: 4660: 4642: 4629: 4619: 4586: 4576: 4575: 4557: 4543: 4450:Quasi-bialgebra 4438: 4301: 4238: 4202: 4080:Oleg Alexandrov 3821: 3793: 3722:Oleg Alexandrov 3714: 3684: 3507: 3388:Oleg Alexandrov 3340: 3339: 3237: 3236: 3148: 3147: 3122: 3035:Oleg Alexandrov 3013:—The preceding 3008: 2982: 2941: 2886: 2874:Gene Ward Smith 2870:surreal numbers 2858: 2798: 2797: 2755: 2754: 2704: 2703: 2663: 2662: 2530: 2529: 2487: 2486: 2438: 2437: 2395: 2394: 2388: 2361: 2340: 2334: 2328: 2322: 2299:Gene Ward Smith 2281:Oleg Alexandrov 2267:Gene Ward Smith 2256: 2246:Gene Ward Smith 2233: 2188: 2182: 2164: 2114:ordinal numbers 2085: 2046: 2024: 2004: 1986: 1925: 1884: 1859: 1775: 1747:maths into the 1728: 1623: 1592:Septentrionalis 1498: 1391:MIT style guide 1258: 1244: 1233: 1227: 1218: 1104: 94: 93: 80: 77: 37: 36: 29: 28: 12: 11: 5: 6248: 6246: 6238: 6237: 6227: 6226: 6223: 6222: 6194: 6191: 6181: 6180: 6156: 6155: 6144: 6141: 6138: 6135: 6132: 6129: 6126: 6123: 6120: 6117: 6114: 6111: 6108: 6105: 6102: 6099: 6072: 6069: 6066: 6063: 6060: 6057: 6054: 6051: 6048: 6045: 6042: 6039: 6036: 6033: 6030: 6027: 6011: 6008: 5973: 5972: 5961: 5955: 5952: 5947: 5944: 5941: 5938: 5932: 5929: 5924: 5908: 5904: 5901: 5898: 5892: 5889: 5884: 5865: 5862: 5835: 5832: 5805: 5804:Eventology AfD 5802: 5801: 5800: 5768: 5765: 5764: 5763: 5731: 5728: 5727: 5726: 5725: 5724: 5708: 5707: 5689: 5686: 5681: 5677: 5672: 5668: 5663: 5659: 5655: 5650: 5646: 5642: 5639: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5607: 5604: 5601: 5596: 5592: 5588: 5585: 5580: 5576: 5572: 5567: 5564: 5561: 5557: 5553: 5548: 5545: 5542: 5537: 5534: 5531: 5527: 5519: 5515: 5511: 5506: 5503: 5496: 5492: 5485: 5481: 5477: 5472: 5468: 5461: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5443: 5439: 5435: 5430: 5427: 5424: 5420: 5416: 5411: 5408: 5405: 5400: 5397: 5394: 5390: 5382: 5378: 5374: 5369: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5346: 5335: 5332: 5329: 5324: 5320: 5316: 5313: 5308: 5304: 5300: 5295: 5292: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5276: 5273: 5270: 5265: 5262: 5259: 5255: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5234: 5231: 5228: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5210: 5207: 5204: 5200: 5196: 5191: 5188: 5185: 5180: 5177: 5174: 5170: 5162: 5158: 5154: 5149: 5144: 5140: 5136: 5131: 5127: 5123: 5118: 5115: 5112: 5108: 5104: 5099: 5096: 5093: 5088: 5085: 5082: 5078: 5070: 5066: 5062: 5057: 5052: 5048: 5044: 5034: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5008: 5004: 5000: 4995: 4992: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4976: 4973: 4970: 4965: 4962: 4959: 4955: 4947: 4943: 4939: 4934: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4916: 4912: 4908: 4903: 4900: 4897: 4893: 4889: 4884: 4881: 4878: 4873: 4870: 4867: 4863: 4855: 4851: 4847: 4842: 4837: 4833: 4803: 4799: 4775: 4771: 4759: 4758: 4757: 4746: 4741: 4737: 4733: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4715: 4712: 4709: 4705: 4701: 4696: 4693: 4690: 4685: 4682: 4679: 4675: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4654: 4649: 4645: 4641: 4636: 4632: 4626: 4622: 4616: 4611: 4608: 4605: 4601: 4593: 4589: 4585: 4553: 4542: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4483: 4482: 4475:speedy keep. - 4437: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4409: 4408: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4300: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4290: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4259: 4258: 4237: 4234: 4233: 4232: 4206:Lebesgue spine 4201: 4200:Lebesgue spine 4198: 4197: 4196: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4160: 4159: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4072: 4071: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4057: 4056: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4020: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 3992: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3942: 3941: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3877: 3876: 3820: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3789: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3713: 3710: 3683: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3588:each and every 3569: 3568: 3532: 3531: 3506: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3487:KISS principle 3483: 3462: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3366: 3359: 3347: 3336: 3326: 3325: 3314: 3313: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3292: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3259: 3254: 3249: 3245: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3181: 3178: 3175: 3170: 3165: 3160: 3156: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3121: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3076: 3075: 3061:at the top of 3059: 3058: 3057: 3049:Call the page 3007: 3004: 2981: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2947:about whether 2940: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2912: 2911: 2885: 2880: 2857: 2854: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2841: 2828: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2795: 2793: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2752: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2722: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2688: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2670: 2660: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2602: 2601: 2574: 2573: 2560: 2557: 2554: 2551: 2548: 2545: 2542: 2539: 2526: 2525: 2512: 2509: 2506: 2503: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2480: 2479: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2434: 2433: 2420: 2417: 2414: 2411: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2387: 2384: 2360: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2292: 2291: 2255: 2252: 2237:p-adic numbers 2232: 2231:P-adic numbers 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2201:It looks like 2163: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2139: 2138: 2128: 2127: 2106: 2084: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2045: 2042: 2023: 2020: 2003: 2000: 1985: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1949: 1948: 1924: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1883: 1877: 1858: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1823: 1822: 1774: 1771: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1689: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1642: 1641: 1638: 1622: 1619: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1530: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1384: 1383: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1340:We consider... 1302: 1301: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1238: 1235: 1234: 1229: 1225: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1161: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1047: 992: 937: 882: 827: 772: 717: 662: 607: 552: 497: 442: 387: 332: 277: 222: 167: 112: 91: 90: 89: 86: 85: 82: 81: 76: 75: 68: 61: 53: 50: 44: 38: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6247: 6236: 6233: 6232: 6230: 6221: 6218: 6214: 6210: 6209: 6208: 6207: 6204: 6200: 6197:The piece on 6192: 6190: 6189: 6186: 6179: 6176: 6171: 6167: 6166: 6165: 6164: 6161: 6139: 6133: 6130: 6124: 6118: 6115: 6109: 6106: 6103: 6097: 6090: 6089: 6088: 6086: 6067: 6061: 6058: 6052: 6046: 6043: 6037: 6034: 6031: 6025: 6017: 6007: 6006: 6002: 5998: 5994: 5990: 5986: 5982: 5978: 5977:sinc function 5959: 5953: 5950: 5945: 5942: 5939: 5936: 5930: 5927: 5922: 5906: 5902: 5899: 5896: 5890: 5887: 5882: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5871: 5870:sinc function 5863: 5861: 5860: 5857: 5853: 5849: 5845: 5841: 5833: 5831: 5830: 5827: 5823: 5819: 5815: 5811: 5803: 5799: 5796: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5789: 5786: 5782: 5778: 5774: 5766: 5762: 5759: 5755: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5748: 5745: 5741: 5738:, break with 5737: 5729: 5723: 5720: 5716: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5706: 5703: 5687: 5684: 5679: 5675: 5670: 5661: 5657: 5653: 5648: 5644: 5637: 5629: 5625: 5621: 5602: 5599: 5594: 5590: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5565: 5562: 5559: 5555: 5546: 5543: 5540: 5535: 5532: 5529: 5525: 5517: 5513: 5509: 5504: 5501: 5494: 5490: 5483: 5479: 5475: 5470: 5466: 5459: 5454: 5450: 5441: 5437: 5433: 5428: 5425: 5422: 5418: 5409: 5406: 5403: 5398: 5395: 5392: 5388: 5380: 5376: 5372: 5367: 5362: 5358: 5354: 5347: 5330: 5327: 5322: 5318: 5306: 5302: 5298: 5293: 5290: 5287: 5283: 5274: 5271: 5268: 5263: 5260: 5257: 5253: 5245: 5241: 5237: 5232: 5229: 5221: 5217: 5213: 5208: 5205: 5202: 5198: 5189: 5186: 5183: 5178: 5175: 5172: 5168: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5147: 5142: 5138: 5129: 5125: 5121: 5116: 5113: 5110: 5106: 5097: 5094: 5091: 5086: 5083: 5080: 5076: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5055: 5050: 5046: 5042: 5035: 5019: 5015: 5006: 5002: 4998: 4993: 4990: 4987: 4983: 4974: 4971: 4968: 4963: 4960: 4957: 4953: 4945: 4941: 4937: 4932: 4927: 4923: 4914: 4910: 4906: 4901: 4898: 4895: 4891: 4882: 4879: 4876: 4871: 4868: 4865: 4861: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4840: 4835: 4831: 4823: 4822: 4819: 4801: 4797: 4773: 4769: 4760: 4744: 4739: 4735: 4726: 4722: 4718: 4713: 4710: 4707: 4703: 4694: 4691: 4688: 4683: 4680: 4677: 4673: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4652: 4647: 4643: 4639: 4634: 4630: 4624: 4620: 4614: 4609: 4606: 4603: 4599: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4574: 4573: 4571: 4567: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4561: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4528: 4524: 4523: 4522: 4521: 4518: 4514: 4513: 4508: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4481: 4478: 4474: 4471: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4461: 4457: 4456: 4451: 4447: 4443: 4442:User:Mathguru 4435: 4431: 4428: 4424: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4418: 4414: 4407: 4404: 4400: 4394: 4391: 4387: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4370: 4366: 4362: 4358: 4354: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4340: 4337: 4332: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4325: 4324: 4321: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4311: 4307: 4298: 4295: 4289: 4286: 4283: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4271: 4268: 4265:Frenchmen). 4263: 4262: 4261: 4260: 4257: 4254: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4244: 4235: 4231: 4228: 4225: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4215: 4211: 4207: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4180: 4179: 4174: 4171: 4168: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4158: 4155: 4151: 4147: 4143: 4140: 4137: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4128: 4124: 4121: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4111: 4108: 4104: 4099: 4098: 4095: 4090: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4070: 4067: 4063: 4062: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 4010: 4007: 4002: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3993: 3984: 3981: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3954: 3951: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3940: 3937: 3934: 3930: 3926: 3925: 3918: 3915: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3900: 3897: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3875: 3872: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3849: 3845: 3840: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3818: 3812: 3809: 3808:Michael Hardy 3805: 3801: 3798:. The cases 3797: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3764: 3763:Michael Hardy 3755: 3752: 3748: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3738: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3711: 3709: 3708: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3682: 3678: 3668: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3620:or check the 3619: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3610: 3601: 3598: 3594: 3589: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3578: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3567: 3564: 3560: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3549: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3530: 3527: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3517: 3511: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3481: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3463: 3452: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3440:vector spaces 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3418: 3415: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3374: 3371: 3367: 3364: 3360: 3345: 3337: 3334: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3324: 3321: 3316: 3315: 3310: 3306: 3303: 3302:Michael Hardy 3299: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3257: 3247: 3243: 3235: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3192: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3168: 3158: 3154: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3128: 3119: 3115: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3091:Fine topology 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3082: 3074: 3071: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3055: 3054: 3052: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3031: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3005: 3003: 3002: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2980:Moore closure 2979: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963:p-adic number 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2938: 2935: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2910: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2897: 2896: 2891: 2884: 2881: 2879: 2878: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2855: 2849: 2846: 2842: 2826: 2823: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2811: 2808: 2805: 2796: 2794: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2760: 2753: 2751:as opposed to 2750: 2732: 2729: 2726: 2723: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2702: 2701: 2686: 2683: 2680: 2677: 2674: 2671: 2668: 2661: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2652: 2651:Michael Hardy 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2642: 2641:Michael Hardy 2632: 2629: 2625: 2620: 2619: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2600: 2597: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2586: 2585:Michael Hardy 2581: 2579: 2558: 2555: 2552: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2528: 2527: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2501: 2498: 2495: 2492: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2436: 2435: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2403: 2400: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2385: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2359: 2356: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2337: 2331: 2325: 2317: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2303: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2253: 2251: 2250: 2247: 2242: 2238: 2230: 2224: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2194: 2187: 2180: 2176: 2171: 2169: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2126: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2071: 2068: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2055: 2051: 2043: 2041: 2040: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2021: 2019: 2018: 2015: 2014: 2009: 2002:TeX font size 2001: 1999: 1998: 1995: 1991: 1984:James Stewart 1983: 1977: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1960: 1956: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1944: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1922: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1882: 1878: 1876: 1875: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1828: 1821: 1818: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1772: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1741: 1740:User:Dmharvey 1737: 1733: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1703:Michael Hardy 1693: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1667: 1666: 1660: 1659: 1656: 1655:Michael Hardy 1652: 1648: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1632: 1628: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1614: 1613:Michael Hardy 1609: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1568: 1563: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1554: 1550: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1540: 1536: 1531: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1507: 1503: 1495: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1466: 1465:Allen Hatcher 1462: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1442: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1400: 1397: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1271: 1268: 1263: 1255: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1222: 1221: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1162: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 997: 993: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 942: 938: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887: 883: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 833: 832: 828: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 777: 773: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 722: 718: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 667: 663: 661: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 612: 608: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 553: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 498: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 443: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 392: 388: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 337: 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 282: 278: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 227: 223: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 172: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 117: 113: 111: 107: 103: 99: 96: 92:Earlier years 88: 87: 84: 83: 79: 74: 69: 67: 62: 60: 55: 54: 48: 43: 42: 33: 27: 23: 19: 6196: 6182: 6157: 6013: 5997:Jitse Niesen 5974: 5867: 5837: 5808:The article 5807: 5795:Jersey Devil 5770: 5758:Jersey Devil 5744:Jersey Devil 5733: 5627: 5623: 4817: 4554: 4550: 4544: 4527:Jitse Niesen 4510: 4504: 4490:Jitse Niesen 4453: 4439: 4410: 4330: 4306:Arthur Rubin 4302: 4296: 4239: 4203: 4122: 4100: 4094:Jersey Devil 4091: 4073: 3856:Jitse Niesen 3841: 3822: 3803: 3799: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3760: 3747:Arthur Rubin 3715: 3685: 3587: 3539: 3533: 3512: 3508: 3474: 3332: 3123: 3077: 3032: 3009: 2983: 2948: 2942: 2936: 2920:Jitse Niesen 2893: 2887: 2859: 2637: 2608: 2582: 2575: 2481: 2389: 2375: 2362: 2320: 2319: 2275:Comments at 2257: 2234: 2172: 2165: 2148:Jitse Niesen 2118:Arthur Rubin 2086: 2069: 2047: 2025: 2011: 2008:Village pump 2005: 1994:Jersey Devil 1987: 1961: 1926: 1887: 1885: 1860: 1836: 1824: 1801: 1790:sci.math FAQ 1776: 1736:meta:Blahtex 1729: 1701: 1691: 1685: 1663: 1661: 1650: 1643: 1626: 1624: 1607: 1605: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1566: 1515: 1499: 1373: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1291: 1287: 1272: 1259: 1240: 1163: 1108: 1049: 994: 939: 884: 829: 774: 719: 664: 609: 554: 499: 444: 389: 334: 279: 224: 191: 169: 114: 110:Sep–Dec 2004 106:Jan–Aug 2004 51: 6215:I guess. -- 6213:hagiography 6199:Barry Simon 6016:Subadditive 5816:) has been 5773:Mathematics 4820:for k : --> 4224:Paul August 4167:Paul August 4136:Paul August 4120:User:Helgus 4107:Paul August 3977:Paul August 3933:Paul August 2609:The TeXbook 2254:Real number 2091:? Thanks. 2022:Koszul-Tate 1923:WAREL back? 1854:Rewrite of 1837:speedy keep 1627:traditional 1267:Braid group 6160:Madmath789 5810:Eventology 4444:has AfD'd 4440:A certain 4436:Maths AfDs 4411:How about 4253:Ryan Reich 4214:Madmath789 4186:Salix alba 4182:eventology 4103:eventology 4046:Salix alba 4042:eventology 3914:Madmath789 3848:eventology 3844:eventology 3781:times the 3688:dual space 3681:dual space 3630:Salix alba 3491:Salix alba 3386:anywhere. 3105:either. -- 3081:Madmath789 3053:and use a 3019:Madmath789 2918:guest. -- 2616:0201134489 2482:and this: 2364:User:CltFn 2244:notation. 1802:ad nauseam 1760:Salix alba 1476:Salix alba 1352:Salix alba 98:Motivation 5872:, namely 4427:Trovatore 4403:Trovatore 4390:Trovatore 4331:Save page 4066:Dysprosia 4040:Also the 3700:talk page 3692:this diff 3577:JRSpriggs 3548:JRSpriggs 3526:Dysprosia 3516:JRSpriggs 3414:Dysprosia 3370:RickiRich 3127:this page 2971:Gandalf61 2953:Gandalf61 2845:Dysprosia 2596:Dysprosia 2316:talk page 2220:Trovatore 2211:Trovatore 2193:Trovatore 2133:Dysprosia 2054:Trovatore 1943:Trovatore 1932:Trovatore 1798:talk page 1756:MediaWiki 1743:converts 1732:wikimania 1472:/Graphics 6229:Category 6175:Dmharvey 5979:in two, 5848:deletion 5702:Dmharvey 4512:Blnguyen 4509:as well. 4455:Blnguyen 4369:Dmharvey 4320:Dmharvey 4154:Staecker 4127:Staecker 3802:= 1 and 3622:bugZilla 3542:. See 3471:OpenMath 3448:Dmharvey 3333:parsable 3320:Staecker 3103:Thin set 3027:contribs 3015:unsigned 2089:zeration 2083:Zeration 2073:contribs 1965:contribs 1888:category 1879:AfD for 1841:WP:POINT 1827:Melchoir 1817:Melchoir 1782:Melchoir 1606:Are you 1553:Staecker 1506:Staecker 1438:Reader12 1396:Reader12 24:‎ | 20:‎ | 5852:Lambiam 5822:Lambiam 5781:Lambiam 5752:I have 4541:A query 4415:? :-) - 4150:WP:AUTO 3892:Lambiam 3660:Lambiam 3593:Lambiam 3559:Lambiam 3107:Lambiam 2994:Lambiam 2659:example 1969:blocked 1896:Lambiam 1867:Lambiam 1713:Lambiam 1631:hyphens 1625:By the 1520:Deville 1241:15 days 22:Archive 5846:) for 5740:WP:NOT 4761:where 4359:, and 4310:(talk) 4285:(Talk) 4006:Helgus 3950:Helgus 3751:(talk) 3626:WP:AWB 3467:MathML 2988:; see 2868:, and 2122:(talk) 2110:Tarski 1778:Loom91 1749:MathML 1665:hyphen 1562:hyphen 1417:(Talk) 1309:MarSch 1279:(Talk) 6217:CSTAR 5719:linas 4477:lethe 4417:lethe 4336:KSmrq 4267:Lunch 4243:Lunch 3871:lethe 3854:. -- 3737:Lunch 3704:lethe 3658:). -- 3067:Kusma 2628:KSmrq 2177:from 2146:. -- 2077:lethe 2063:JLISP 2044:WAREL 1973:lethe 1845:KSmrq 1806:KSmrq 1804:.) -- 1745:LaTeX 1588:about 1571:KSmrq 1567:wrong 1539:KSmrq 1378:KSmrq 16:< 6001:talk 5983:and 5923:sinc 5883:sinc 5850:. -- 5820:. -- 4531:talk 4494:talk 4473:both 4470:them 4448:and 4365:Cech 4361:Čech 4355:and 4299:name 4190:talk 4118:But 4084:talk 4050:talk 3860:talk 3726:talk 3634:talk 3495:talk 3469:and 3392:talk 3361:See 3070:(討論) 3039:talk 3023:talk 2992:. -- 2924:talk 2895:Ruud 2613:ISBN 2377:Ruud 2285:talk 2263:page 2152:talk 2103:WP:N 2093:Samw 2075:). - 2067:talk 2052:. -- 2013:Ruud 1959:talk 1955:KLIP 1927:See 1843:. -- 1794:here 1764:talk 1651:some 1608:sure 1524:Talk 1480:talk 1356:talk 1350:. -- 1318:Igny 1165:2024 1110:2023 1051:2022 996:2021 941:2020 886:2019 831:2018 776:2017 721:2016 666:2015 611:2014 556:2013 501:2012 446:2011 391:2010 336:2009 281:2008 226:2007 171:2006 116:2005 26:2006 5937:sin 5897:sin 5742:?-- 4308:| 4282:C S 3749:| 3446:.) 3029:) . 2578:TeX 2370:to 2323:127 2186:cfm 2120:| 2036:RJH 1971:. - 1752:XML 1516:way 1463:by 1414:C S 1374:not 1292:one 1276:C S 1214:Dec 1210:Nov 1206:Oct 1202:Sep 1198:Aug 1194:Jul 1190:Jun 1186:May 1182:Apr 1178:Mar 1174:Feb 1170:Jan 1159:Dec 1155:Nov 1151:Oct 1147:Sep 1143:Aug 1139:Jul 1135:Jun 1131:May 1127:Apr 1123:Mar 1119:Feb 1115:Jan 1100:Dec 1096:Nov 1092:Oct 1088:Sep 1084:Aug 1080:Jul 1076:Jun 1072:May 1068:Apr 1064:Mar 1060:Feb 1056:Jan 1045:Dec 1041:Nov 1037:Oct 1033:Sep 1029:Aug 1025:Jul 1021:Jun 1017:May 1013:Apr 1009:Mar 1005:Feb 1001:Jan 990:Dec 986:Nov 982:Oct 978:Sep 974:Aug 970:Jul 966:Jun 962:May 958:Apr 954:Mar 950:Feb 946:Jan 935:Dec 931:Nov 927:Oct 923:Sep 919:Aug 915:Jul 911:Jun 907:May 903:Apr 899:Mar 895:Feb 891:Jan 880:Dec 876:Nov 872:Oct 868:Sep 864:Aug 860:Jul 856:Jun 852:May 848:Apr 844:Mar 840:Feb 836:Jan 825:Dec 821:Nov 817:Oct 813:Sep 809:Aug 805:Jul 801:Jun 797:May 793:Apr 789:Mar 785:Feb 781:Jan 770:Dec 766:Nov 762:Oct 758:Sep 754:Aug 750:Jul 746:Jun 742:May 738:Apr 734:Mar 730:Feb 726:Jan 715:Dec 711:Nov 707:Oct 703:Sep 699:Aug 695:Jul 691:Jun 687:May 683:Apr 679:Mar 675:Feb 671:Jan 660:Dec 656:Nov 652:Oct 648:Sep 644:Aug 640:Jul 636:Jun 632:May 628:Apr 624:Mar 620:Feb 616:Jan 605:Dec 601:Nov 597:Oct 593:Sep 589:Aug 585:Jul 581:Jun 577:May 573:Apr 569:Mar 565:Feb 561:Jan 550:Dec 546:Nov 542:Oct 538:Sep 534:Aug 530:Jul 526:Jun 522:May 518:Apr 514:Mar 510:Feb 506:Jan 495:Dec 491:Nov 487:Oct 483:Sep 479:Aug 475:Jul 471:Jun 467:May 463:Apr 459:Mar 455:Feb 451:Jan 440:Dec 436:Nov 432:Oct 428:Sep 424:Aug 420:Jul 416:Jun 412:May 408:Apr 404:Mar 400:Feb 396:Jan 385:Dec 381:Nov 377:Oct 373:Sep 369:Aug 365:Jul 361:Jun 357:May 353:Apr 349:Mar 345:Feb 341:Jan 330:Dec 326:Nov 322:Oct 318:Sep 314:Aug 310:Jul 306:Jun 302:May 298:Apr 294:Mar 290:Feb 286:Jan 275:Dec 271:Nov 267:Oct 263:Sep 259:Aug 255:Jul 251:Jun 247:May 243:Apr 239:Mar 235:Feb 231:Jan 220:Dec 216:Nov 212:Oct 208:Sep 204:Aug 200:Jul 196:Jun 192:May 188:Apr 184:Mar 180:Feb 176:Jan 165:Dec 161:Nov 157:Oct 153:Sep 149:Aug 145:Jul 141:Jun 137:May 133:Apr 129:Mar 125:Feb 121:Jan 6231:: 6134:μ 6119:μ 6116:≤ 6107:∪ 6098:μ 6044:≤ 6003:) 5951:π 5943:π 5940:⁡ 5916:or 5900:⁡ 5717:. 5700:. 5688:ϵ 5685:≤ 5654:− 5638:ϵ 5600:− 5571:− 5544:− 5526:∑ 5505:− 5476:− 5460:− 5434:− 5407:− 5389:∑ 5368:− 5328:− 5299:− 5272:− 5254:∑ 5233:− 5214:− 5187:− 5169:∑ 5148:− 5122:− 5095:− 5077:∑ 5056:− 4999:− 4972:− 4954:∑ 4933:− 4907:− 4880:− 4862:∑ 4841:− 4719:− 4692:− 4674:∑ 4653:− 4600:∑ 4572:, 4533:) 4515:| 4496:) 4458:| 4334:-- 4192:) 4123:is 4086:) 4052:) 3931:. 3929:OR 3862:) 3728:) 3720:. 3636:) 3497:) 3394:) 3368:-- 3346:∑ 3253:∞ 3244:∫ 3164:∞ 3155:∫ 3065:? 3045:) 3041:) 3025:• 2969:. 2926:) 2864:, 2287:) 2189:}} 2183:{{ 2154:) 1967:) 1941:-- 1766:) 1668:: 1633:, 1584:is 1580:of 1551:) 1526:) 1504:. 1482:) 1412:-- 1394:-- 1389:A 1358:) 1344:we 1328:We 1323:) 1288:We 1212:· 1208:· 1204:· 1200:· 1196:· 1192:· 1188:· 1184:· 1180:· 1176:· 1172:· 1168:: 1157:· 1153:· 1149:· 1145:· 1141:· 1137:· 1133:· 1129:· 1125:· 1121:· 1117:· 1113:: 1098:· 1094:· 1090:· 1086:· 1082:· 1078:· 1074:· 1070:· 1066:· 1062:· 1058:· 1054:: 1043:· 1039:· 1035:· 1031:· 1027:· 1023:· 1019:· 1015:· 1011:· 1007:· 1003:· 999:: 988:· 984:· 980:· 976:· 972:· 968:· 964:· 960:· 956:· 952:· 948:· 944:: 933:· 929:· 925:· 921:· 917:· 913:· 909:· 905:· 901:· 897:· 893:· 889:: 878:· 874:· 870:· 866:· 862:· 858:· 854:· 850:· 846:· 842:· 838:· 834:: 823:· 819:· 815:· 811:· 807:· 803:· 799:· 795:· 791:· 787:· 783:· 779:: 768:· 764:· 760:· 756:· 752:· 748:· 744:· 740:· 736:· 732:· 728:· 724:: 713:· 709:· 705:· 701:· 697:· 693:· 689:· 685:· 681:· 677:· 673:· 669:: 658:· 654:· 650:· 646:· 642:· 638:· 634:· 630:· 626:· 622:· 618:· 614:: 603:· 599:· 595:· 591:· 587:· 583:· 579:· 575:· 571:· 567:· 563:· 559:: 548:· 544:· 540:· 536:· 532:· 528:· 524:· 520:· 516:· 512:· 508:· 504:: 493:· 489:· 485:· 481:· 477:· 473:· 469:· 465:· 461:· 457:· 453:· 449:: 438:· 434:· 430:· 426:· 422:· 418:· 414:· 410:· 406:· 402:· 398:· 394:: 383:· 379:· 375:· 371:· 367:· 363:· 359:· 355:· 351:· 347:· 343:· 339:: 328:· 324:· 320:· 316:· 312:· 308:· 304:· 300:· 296:· 292:· 288:· 284:: 273:· 269:· 265:· 261:· 257:· 253:· 249:· 245:· 241:· 237:· 233:· 229:: 218:· 214:· 210:· 206:· 202:· 198:· 194:· 190:· 186:· 182:· 178:· 174:: 163:· 159:· 155:· 151:· 147:· 143:· 139:· 135:· 131:· 127:· 123:· 119:: 108:· 104:· 100:· 6143:) 6140:F 6137:( 6131:+ 6128:) 6125:E 6122:( 6113:) 6110:F 6104:E 6101:( 6071:) 6068:y 6065:( 6062:f 6059:+ 6056:) 6053:x 6050:( 6047:f 6041:) 6038:y 6035:+ 6032:x 6029:( 6026:f 5999:( 5960:. 5954:x 5946:x 5931:= 5928:x 5907:x 5903:x 5891:= 5888:x 5680:n 5676:b 5671:/ 5667:) 5662:N 5658:b 5649:n 5645:b 5641:( 5628:b 5624:s 5606:) 5603:s 5595:k 5591:S 5587:( 5584:) 5579:k 5575:b 5566:1 5563:+ 5560:k 5556:b 5552:( 5547:1 5541:n 5536:N 5533:= 5530:k 5518:n 5514:b 5510:1 5502:s 5495:n 5491:b 5484:N 5480:b 5471:n 5467:b 5455:k 5451:S 5447:) 5442:k 5438:b 5429:1 5426:+ 5423:k 5419:b 5415:( 5410:1 5404:N 5399:0 5396:= 5393:k 5381:n 5377:b 5373:1 5363:n 5359:S 5355:= 5334:) 5331:s 5323:k 5319:S 5315:( 5312:) 5307:k 5303:b 5294:1 5291:+ 5288:k 5284:b 5280:( 5275:1 5269:n 5264:N 5261:= 5258:k 5246:n 5242:b 5238:1 5230:s 5227:) 5222:k 5218:b 5209:1 5206:+ 5203:k 5199:b 5195:( 5190:1 5184:n 5179:N 5176:= 5173:k 5161:n 5157:b 5153:1 5143:k 5139:S 5135:) 5130:k 5126:b 5117:1 5114:+ 5111:k 5107:b 5103:( 5098:1 5092:N 5087:0 5084:= 5081:k 5069:n 5065:b 5061:1 5051:n 5047:S 5043:= 5020:k 5016:S 5012:) 5007:k 5003:b 4994:1 4991:+ 4988:k 4984:b 4980:( 4975:1 4969:n 4964:N 4961:= 4958:k 4946:n 4942:b 4938:1 4928:k 4924:S 4920:) 4915:k 4911:b 4902:1 4899:+ 4896:k 4892:b 4888:( 4883:1 4877:N 4872:0 4869:= 4866:k 4854:n 4850:b 4846:1 4836:n 4832:S 4818:s 4802:k 4798:S 4774:k 4770:S 4745:, 4740:k 4736:S 4732:) 4727:k 4723:b 4714:1 4711:+ 4708:k 4704:b 4700:( 4695:1 4689:n 4684:0 4681:= 4678:k 4666:n 4662:b 4658:1 4648:n 4644:S 4640:= 4635:k 4631:x 4625:k 4621:b 4615:n 4610:0 4607:= 4604:k 4592:n 4588:b 4584:1 4555:n 4551:x 4529:( 4492:( 4227:☎ 4188:( 4170:☎ 4139:☎ 4110:☎ 4082:( 4048:( 3980:☎ 3936:☎ 3858:( 3804:n 3800:n 3791:i 3787:D 3783:n 3779:t 3775:n 3724:( 3632:( 3493:( 3390:( 3269:. 3266:x 3263:d 3258:1 3248:0 3180:. 3177:x 3174:d 3169:1 3159:0 3037:( 3021:( 2949:p 2937:p 2922:( 2827:h 2824:+ 2821:g 2818:+ 2815:f 2812:+ 2809:e 2806:+ 2779:d 2776:+ 2773:c 2770:+ 2767:b 2764:+ 2761:a 2733:h 2730:+ 2727:g 2724:+ 2721:f 2718:+ 2715:e 2712:+ 2687:d 2684:+ 2681:c 2678:+ 2675:b 2672:+ 2669:a 2611:( 2559:h 2556:+ 2553:g 2550:+ 2547:f 2544:+ 2541:e 2538:+ 2511:d 2508:+ 2505:c 2502:+ 2499:b 2496:+ 2493:a 2465:h 2462:+ 2459:g 2456:+ 2453:f 2450:+ 2447:e 2444:+ 2419:d 2416:+ 2413:c 2410:+ 2407:b 2404:+ 2401:a 2341:1 2338:. 2335:* 2332:. 2329:* 2326:. 2283:( 2150:( 2105:. 2070:· 2065:( 1962:· 1957:( 1762:( 1522:( 1478:( 1354:( 1249:. 78:) 72:e 65:t 58:v 34:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2006/May - Knowledge

Index