Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment

1026:. As you say, there are some concepts which get tagged as "low importance" in the main category but are still very important from a subcategory's perspective, like for example da Vinci or the Affordable Care Act. Those might be high importance in the "Medicine - Society and Culture" task force. Other major concepts in medicine, like anything to do with pharmacy, might also be low ranking in medicine but high ranking in pharmacy, which also makes for a confusing separation. For any given WikiProject there could be lots of distinctions and on the back end of things there is no sorting mechanism. Also - just because things are the way they are, I am not convinced that this is the way people want things to be. If there were options for more granularity in sorting and ranking articles, then I think that more people could make more useful subcategorizations. However, I also think that a conflicting motivation is that lots of people wish to avoid creating intersections of categories, and instead I think there is demand for having an automated tool that combines two categories. Like for example, instead there being a "medicine - society and culture" project, I think there should be a "medicine" tag and a "society and culture" tag, with the option for a person to combine them. No want wants for their to be a subproject for "Medicine - United States", "Medicine - anatomy", "Medicine - history", and yet with the current system setting up these kinds of single-use intersections is the only way possible for generating lists of articles categorized within a specific scope. A consequence of this is, for example, that WikiProject Medicine has never had any significant participation by anyone developing articles on the culture of medicine, which I think is more a consequence of the design of the current system than what the community here intends. Lots of people could be interested in low-priority articles if only they could be tagged as important for a certain purpose. 1000:

articles that default to Low-importance. One way to handle those is to add information to the model, but I'm also wondering if these articles are arguing for WP:MED's importance scale getting an additional category (or the articles not being in scope of WP:MED, but I'm not sure that's a useful path for the discussion to take). Something along the lines of "we'd like to keep an eye on this article, but it's not within our main interest area so it's not actually important." I know some projects added a "bottom" importance to their scale, but this seems different, because to me giving these articles an importance rating has a different meaning (this is also the problem with rating them Low-importance, it overloads the meaning of what "Low-importance" is). As you can see, I don't have a clear idea of how to proceed, but I'll keep thinking about it, and please don't hesitate to pitch in with your thoughts! Cheers,

2387:: Removal of a few identified pages is not the issue. Even I could have done it. The number of (articles on) experimental drugs or (articles on) those in pre-clinical stage is relatively few. Barring those few (and a few others like pharma companies, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics stuff) there is prospect of overlap of basically the entire WP:Pharmacology with WP:Medicine. On the other hand, the number of articles actually tagged under both is relatively less. So, why do we not define a guideline that articles tagged under WP:Pharmacology need not be separately tagged with WP:Medicine? If that happens, WPMED users who want to edit pharmacology articles can easily avoid the nominal stuff that they themselves are not interested in. 1368:, I greatly appreciate it! Based on your comments, I think it's clear that we're seeing a difference between how WikiProject Medicine prioritizes topics, and the extent to which readers are accessing these pages and how many other pages link to them. It is most likely also partly a result of the low number and homogeneity of Top-importance articles in WP:MED when it comes to the two main predictors we use (percentile of views and inlinks), ref the scatterplots on the right. All of the articles with Top-importance predictions you mention have a relatively high number of views, the lowest is 1885:

limited by WikiProjects. I myself edit pages for a varied number of topics. I understand your point and have no intention to argue. I just want to say that unnecessary overlap is pointless. The scope of military history and medicine are significantly different but that is not the case with pharmacology and medicine. Users of WPMED essentially know what they would find in WP:Pharmacology. There is no component of surprise in it. They even know which categories to look into if they are to find and edit a particular topic. So, I doubt if overlap in pharmacology articles really makes sense.

4197:- Originally rated as a start article, I began working to update both the references and the overall content in every section of this article. Multiple references were added from expert subject matter on the topic of spinal cord injury. Completed goals: significant expansion of knowledge within the article throughout all sections of the article, added illustrations for clarification of topics, added specific etiologies, and added an anatomical explanation of tetraplegia and how it relates to the injury 3572:, thank you for your work. Do you think this article could use more links to other/related articles? We try not to add a link to the same article more than once or twice in a page, but there's a lot of jargon. Also, if you're interested in expanding it, I think it might benefit from a section on practical life effects, which we usually put under ==Prognosis== (e.g., it is associated with progressive blindness) or ==Society and culture== (e.g., effects on schools or employment). 1352: 338: 1944:: Would you kindly let me know what sort of topics (articles other than that of people or companies) do you suppose WP:Pharmacology contains that are not medicinal in nature? Well you could argue that topics related to pharmacodynamics and phamacokinetics are unnecessary for us. But I believe most of pharmacological agents are used as medicines and hence are under purview of WP:MED. Would it not be an unnecessary double labelling? 109: 4251:- Currently a C-class article. I've updated or rewritten significant portions of the article and added new sections based off of the latest research as there has been a lot of development in the last few years. I've tried to make the article more cohesive and based off of reviews and less a collection of observations from various one off studies, among other general clean up and improvement attempts. 722:, you are awesome. We have a few quirks in our rating system. Of those, the most important from your POV are that people, books, laws, journals, organizations, etc. are all low-importance. But excluding those quirks, this is a gold mine. Some of them might be not quite where we'd place it (e.g., you predict Top, we choose High), but this is incredibly helpful. Thank you. 224: 158: 140: 1281:

how well we're doing, both in terms of whether our predictions are accurate, and if they are useful. If the prediction for a specific article seems off, please do let me know and I'll look up the statistics. And please let me know if you have questions about any of this, I'd be happy to help! You can find the list of articles as the first table on this page:

852:

article where also used there (in addition to other things), but their approach was also slightly different than we do. They calculated a score and then used those to categorise, whereas we take WikiProject categories and train a machine learner to figure out the calculation. Either way, we're both looking to determine roughly the same thing. Cheers,

168: 4320: 4268: 4214: 4171: 4120: 3975: 3886: 3828: 3740: 3693: 3609: 3561: 3518: 3467: 3424: 3381: 3338: 3295: 3260: 3213: 3174: 3107: 3064: 3017: 2854: 2694: 2651: 2608: 4331:, that outdated orange tag at the top, complaining about the references back in 2013(!) is something you can remove yourself. Once you fix a problem (or see that someone else fixed the problem), we really do want you to remove it. There's no need to wait for someone else to double-check. (If someone disagrees, they can stick it back in.) 1718:

medications, and otherwise). Therefore, all such articles have always been put on the WPMED list. The group doesn't want to work on hospitals, so we don't put those on our list. The fact that there are two other groups interested in improving articles about hospitals is irrelevant: we don't want to be bothered with them, so we aren't.

3364:- Greatly expanded the contents of the article, adding new content in existing sections and also adding new sections and additional information, with referencing for all the added information. The information on the article does seem that it has improved from a stub article dramatically. Thank you in advance for the reassessment. -- 3774:- Kjlockart and I have significantly worked on this article culminating in changes in structure/organization of the article for better flow, enhanced readability with precise layperson language, and expansion upon sub headings such as Causes/Mechanisms, Prevention and much more. Citations and images were also reviewed and added. 927:

worked as an artist, so his name appeared in lists of high-traffic art-related articles. Ideally, we would be able to detect when something is part of a set but out of scope for what people expect to see. If you can even articulate the limitations you see in the current system then that would be a great outcome.

3321:- Significant article expansion with almost complete rewrite and several new sections. Updated all references and added new images. Page previously focused almost exclusively on bronchiolitis, expanded to be more representative of other disease presentations. Also resolved several expansion requests. 2327:

etc. are some articles that are tagged under WP:MED in spite of the molecules being in pre-clinical trial stage. In other words, the domains remain stupidly vague and overlapping for no reason. I have already pointed out that the number of articles tagged with both are relatively few in comparison to

2060:

to the articles (similarly for companies, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics etc. stuff which too can be grouped under similar categories) and treat that as a zone that we (from WP:MED) are not interested in, that should suffice to include whole of WP:Pharmacology under the purview of WP:Medicine.

1231:

Yeah, that's why I was going the way through Wikidata as that should allows us to do this in general for any other WikiProject where it's relevant, and we should also be able to identify larger categories (e.g. "scientific journal" and "book" are both subclasses of "publication"). I am not certain it

1120:

I'm unsure whether I've identified good categories of articles that should be Low-importance, and would be happy to correct any mistaken ones. Once I know the list is good, I'll be able to generate some (hopefully) more interesting lists of candidate articles for importance reassessment. Thanks again

999:

Thanks again for your comments! I thought I'd respond here too because the issue with intersections is something I've been thinking about and will look further into. I've already bumped into it in several different ways. When it comes to WP:MED and our prediction models we're mainly interested in the

926:

has an intimate connection with perhaps 500 billion dollars annually but kind of out of scope here, and da Vinci is a biography of someone who influenced cultural aspects of medicine. Knowledge in general has problems with ranking intersections of topics. Another commonly cited example is that Hitler

482:

OK, I guess I can say that I totally hear what you're saying and understand what you mean about the broader perspective ... at the same time, I'm thinking about a patient googling the condition that they are disabled by and finding out that it's not important :/ That being said, point taken -- thank

4357:

article in 2020, using every source I could find (there aren't many, and the article is not very good; medicine doesn't know much about this topic). The topic is classed as low importance, which is the category for "very rare diseases"; but the sources suggest it is a common disease among people who

1717:

The only thing that a WikiProject gets to do is to make a list of which articles they want to work on. The method of making the list (for historical reasons) is to add a template to the article's talk page. The group at WPMED has always wanted to work on articles about medical treatments (surgery,

1021:

I can say more about the problem but I am not sure how to proceed. One issue which has been challenging to address is how to sort the breaking of big topics, like medicine, into subtopics. The infrastructure currently used in Knowledge is to name "task forces" as sub-WikiProjects in WikiProject talk

819:

Thank you so much for commenting, this is really helpful feedback! Apologies for not reading the importance scale description more closely, I might have picked up the various categories of Low-importance if I did. I'll see if I can incorporate that kind of information into our model. BTW, I've got a

558:

I've recently trained a machine learner to make importance predictions for WikiProject Medicine's articles with a Top-, High-, Mid-, or Low-importance rating. We feed the machine learner three measures for each article: daily average number of views over the past four weeks, number of links pointing

3934:

rated this as C-class, which I agree with. The biggest change I'd recommend is adding a lot more links to other Knowledge articles, especially for technical terms or other words that you wouldn't expect everyone (high schooler? English major? bartender? grocery store cashier?) to know. There's

2451:

is for drugs taken off the market, after they reached the market. I have found a huge number of articles that should have been tagged with one of the two categories but have not been. I am in the process of tagging them. I also found that many of those articles were tagged with WP:MED. I am working

1843:

WikiProject tagging cannot help readers, because almost no readers look at talk pages. About 45% of the English Knowledge's readers are using the mobile website (including some readers who are on desktop computers). The most popular article for WPMED, for example, is averaging 4300 page views per

921:

The 1.0 group was a 2003 chat which made some arbitrary decisions that got adopted but never critically examined. The ratings system is well loved but it could change. I appreciate that you are starting from what is currently accepted, and I think that the importance scale generally works, but with

837:

The notes on how many people are affected by various diseases is very helpful, thanks! We started out by just using article views in our model, and I'm wondering if that results in certain medical issues being ranked low because people aren't reading about it on Knowledge. That might also mean that

3090:-- Added content and references as part of the Osmosis.org Knowledge-Editing Course. Currently rated as "Start" quality and has a banner mentioning over-reliance on primary sources; hope to upgrade the quality class and that the added references provide enough information from secondary sources. 1721:

There is absolutely nothing about WPMED making its list that interferes with any other group making its own list. WPMED's interest (or lack thereof) in an article does not change which content or style guidelines apply to the article's contents; it does not change what the article says (or should

1280:

Hi again everyone! Over the past week, I've worked on further improving our model and now have a dataset of predictions to share with you. I gathered about one hundred articles where the model predicts an importance rating that is different from what it currently has. Would love to know more about

562:

We are interested in improving our classifier. Some of that improvement might come from adding sources of information to our model. We started out with a simple model partly to learn how it performs, but also because they are often easier to explain. What additional information we might use is not

1105:

Hi again everyone! First off, thanks for the helpful feedback I got earlier! In the time since I was last active in this discussion, I have been working on identifying the various categories of articles within the scope of WikiProject Medicine that ought to be Low-importance (e.g. individuals and

703:

to be Low-importance I had no idea who he was, but from reading the article he seems rather important). Therefore I won't make strong statements about whether I think our classifier is on the right track. I would, however, love to have a discussion about it! Curious to learn what other members of

1884:

The tagging is intended to help in the collaborative work. Since Knowledge is not the result of work of one individual, there are always going to be things that are yet to be done. Users who see a gap add tags so that other users can take it up from there. The scope of interest of editors is not

3811:- this article was originally a start article and has been almost entirely rewritten. Significant additions to the sections on differential diagnoses and treatment have been included. Article has organizational changes promoting readability for the medical professional or patient alike to read. 851:

I am somewhat familiar with the WP 1.0 project and have read through their archives trying to figure out how exactly they calculated importance, I know at some point they developed a formula and used a bot to label articles. If my memory is correct, popularity and number of links pointing to an

418:

It's concerning to me that real, serious conditions that affect people in large ways, but are less frequent than others, are labeled "low importance" -- I don't think it's the right term, if it's a measure of how many general-purpose readers are going to be interested in a particular topic.

698:

Generally, an article that is predicted to be Mid-/Low-importance is not very popular and has few other articles pointing to it. Articles that are predicted as High-/Top importance are the opposite. Since I am not a medical professional I don't see me as qualified to judge whether an article's

1397:

Another interpretation is that this is challenging because of the wide variety of these measurements for Low- and Mid-importance articles. As the graph shows, these span the complete range. If Low- and Mid-importance articles were less likely to have a high number of views and/or inlinks, the

2219:

My suggestion intended to avoid unnecessary work. Most of the categories should be already in place, and if not, they need to be placed anyway. Most of the drugs are tagged with WP:Pharmacology and not WP:MED. The existing overlap is only in a minority of the pages. My suggestion keeps it in

894:

This is a dead trail - I have nothing to add. There was a certain pharma company in about 2013 who was asking various Wikipedians about automatically generating prevalence articles in English Knowledge (like for example, "Diabetes in Scotland", with census-style information on prevalence and

4407:

Unfortunately there seem to be no statistics on global prevalence. I haven't even seen wild guesses; my wild guess that it's fairly common is based on a guess that "poor tropical populations in environments that can grow cassava, ish" is a fairly large population, and multiplying that by an

3591:

Hello, this article has been expanded; new sections, cited sources, and more recent information has been added following the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles. Edits were also made to the information that was previously present on the article. Thank you in advance!

1792:: I get your point and understand it. The way I see it is that WikiProjects organize articles the participants are likely to be willing to work on. In my view it does form a broad categorization. But at the same time, possibly there is no reason to group articles in two places. 4154:- Currently rated as a C class article. I have added in appropriate and significant sections, including a history, treatments and prevention methods, and others. I have also updated the article with more recent references to ensure there is up-to-date information present. 559:

to the article, and the proportion of links pointing to the article that come from other articles within WikiProject Medicine. Using these measures we are able to correctly predict the importance rating of 63.6% of all articles in our dataset (18,654 of 29,320 articles).

3388:! Promoted to B class based on the broad coverage, the excellent prose, the excellent referencing, the perfect sectioning, and a recommendation from Rater. I believe that it may be ready for a Good Article Nomination (with some modifications to the long lead section). 1113:

in my log on meta, if you're curious. Using that list of categories, I then identified all articles in my WikiProject Medicine dataset that are in these categories but not rated as Low-importance. There were only 126 such articles, and I created a table of them here:

3676:- I have expanded this article and carefully combed through the current research and literature on this topic. I have extracted information from the Treatment's section that was not well supported in literature or should be included within a different article. 2186:

The current state was not my doing. I am simply okay with the status quo. I am not barring a change but you do need to get consensus. I am not entirely clear on how your suggestion would work but it looks like it would take massive amount of work to carry out.

554:

mentions we are looking into doing this both on a high level (e.g. the entire English Knowledge) as well as for specific WikiProjects. I chose WikiProject Medicine as a test case because of our collaborations and because this is an active and well-run project.

838:

our model has a bias towards Western/English-speaking information-seeking behaviour. If we could incorporate information about how many people are affected our model would probably improve greatly. Is that kind of information (readily) available somewhere?

570:, our idea of using popularity and number of links pointing to an article appears to map fairly well onto that scale. Yet, when we use our model to predict importance we get some interesting examples of where the prediction differs from the actual rating. 2884:

article. The number of page views of this article has increased significantly in the last month (possibly because neutralising antibodies are discussed as a treatment option of COVID-19). It might be good to increase the article's importance rating.

1110: 297: 1398:

boundaries for the importance ratings would be clearer, and the model would behave accordingly. While the main goal of this research is to build accurate models, I think we're also seeing some of the limitations of the underlying data.

1446:

Usually a large subject with many associated sub-articles. Less than 1% of medicine-related articles achieve this rating." The bit in bold is key. Diseases that affect a few people or are only common in a few areas is not sufficient.

3202:

Suggestions from previous review were followed. Unnecesary symptom descriptions, argumentative language and unsourced elements were deleted. Better images were selected. Diagnosis controversy posted on first paragraph as suggested.

1799:

today. I found that there are a significant number of them tagged under WPMED and a significant number of others that merely have a WP:Biography tag with or without s&a workgroup allocated to them. I found that rather attaching

1308:

Albinism is uncommon. Melanin is not terribly important when it comes to medicine. Not sure why strychnine is suggested for top? Hormone would be top importance for WP:MCB but not really use. TCM would be top for altmed but not

3751:, thank you so much for adding those pictures and practically doubling the number of sources. If you're interested in expanding it even more some day, then you might find some ideas (not all of which will apply, of course) at 540: 2813:

It's a "rule of thumb", not a hard requirement. This page is not watched by very many people. I'm not sure where to find someone who might be interested, but I'll post it on a page or two, and maybe we'll find someone.

3345:! Promoted to B class based on the broad coverage, the excellent prose, the excellent referencing, the perfect sectioning, and a recommendation from Rater. I believe that it may be ready for a Good Article Nomination. 1807:

In a nutshell, I see WikiProjects as a the broadest levels of categorization in a subject. There is no reason to make the categorizations overlapping. Not that the borders need to be crisp but discrete categorization

4392:

offline releases and which articles the group wants to polish up first (i.e., the 100 "top" and 1,000 "high" articles). "Low" effectively means "unlikely to turn up on a list of articles for suggested improvement".

265: 2272:

It might be worth noting that the Category:WikiProject Pharmacology articles has 10,721 articles and Category:All WikiProject Medicine articles has 34,475 articles. and 2002 articles are tagged in both categories.

4283:

process, I think you'll need to replace some of the older (10+ years) sources with up-to-date information. (It might be possible to simply swap in some of your recently added sources for some of the older ones.)

4027:. For example, the ==Pharmacology== section cites a press release, which is IMO legitimate (because it's talking about what the company did in a particular year), but which some reviewers might reject in a 544: 49: 2940:

Someone has rated the article as B-class, which is the highest quality class possible through this process. The current priority is not unreasonable, and changing it will not have any practical effect.

1052:

that I mentioned above. The list contains articles that might be about individuals and not rated Low-importance. All those that are about individuals had their rating updated to Low-importance. Cheers,

305: 3544:

Hi I’ve redone the majority of the article using new sources and citing more appropriately. I have also expanded on sections that required more information. Thank you in advance for the reassessment

4408:

often-large proportion of that population affected would make it fairly common. I could well be very wrong, multiplying very vague guesses. "Unknown prevalence" doesn't fit very well in the rubric.

2761:: Significant expansion, especially to references. Currently rated as "Stub" quality, I think it now merits a "Start" or possibly a "C", but not higher. (Anyone want to take over developing it?) — 895:

treatment and a dump of seemingly relevant citations). That never went anywhere, but they were quite serious about funding something if only it could be predicted that the community would accept it.

1767:

A WikiProject's list of pages that they want to work on is not a substitute for properly categorizing articles. If the folks at WPMED want to work on these articles – or if they want to work on

1591:

says include them so I do. We should only include medications that have been once used in clinical practice if we include them. Should not include chemicals that have never been used clinically.

1481:

about this project? He knows a lot about the 1.0 assessment system, and is probably your best contact for finding good general ratings (i.e., things not specific to my friends at WP:MED).

774:

Alt med, journals, diets, people, and local medical politics are low importance with respect to WPMED. Euphoria is an emotion which with respect to clinical medicine is of low importance.

1722:

say); it does not change who gets to edit it or what they can put in the article. WPPHARM should make its own list without noticing or caring what any other groups put on their lists.

3935:

no need to add the same link three or four times in the article, but try linking to as many medical/scientific articles once as you can. You can get a general notion of what I mean at

2738:, if you still have an interest in this, could you do a quick search for a few more recent sources? In an ideal world, we wouldn't use sources from the 20th century for any type of 392:

parameter for us, and picking up a few of the simpler quality assessments at the same time. I think that we could get this done every now and again, especially if we point back to

355: 4103:- Currently rated as a start class article. I updated the article with more recent references. Added additional sections previously missing to align with wikimed manual of style. 2000:

Well in that case don't you think that punching these into a category and transcluding it should suffice to include the whole of WP:Pharmacology under the purview of WP:Medicine?

566:

I'd also like to discuss what "importance" means in the context of WikiProject Medicine and how importance ratings are applied to the project's articles. If we take a look at the

2536:

We haven't historically archived old requests, but maybe I'll start copying them to this page, and then they can be archived like any other discussion. Here's the first batch.

949:. Frequency is in the infobox as is mortality. Once 500 or so infoboxes are updated to this the plan was to put it on Wikidata by bot. The update is on my list of "things to do" 1282: 1115: 3958:- I updated the article to be more thorough, added citations, and removed uncited or biased information and would appreciate an assessment for upgrading its class. Thank you. 3752: 3525:! Promoted to B class based on the broad coverage, the good prose, the sectioning (albeit in an unusual order), relatively good referencing, and a recommendation from Rater. 2978: 2899:

Someone has rated it as B-class, which is the highest rating possible through this process. I've updated the priority rating to Mid, since we're working on this more often.

245: 4303:- Currently a start class article. I have made significant changes to all aspects of the article, updated the sources, and made the treatment section more neutral in tone. 3286:

Article expanded. Significant edits made including images and references in addition to the new content. Peer review process involved. Thank you in advance for your time!

551: 524: 1670:

for ones that need to be transcluded from the list of medicines. This would bring a greater portion of WikiProject Pharmacology under the purview of WikiProject Medicine.

4024: 3044: 2923: 249: 3704:, I particularly appreciate your efforts to remove inappropriate information. Thank you. Do you think there is any reliable information on epidemiology or prognosis? 293: 2918:

significant recent changes in the field are not being reflecting, eg CDC and Dutch Health Council abandoning previous treatments CBT and GET which dominate the page,

2799:

Okay. I hadn't checked or been aware of the rule. Thank you. (My question about someone else working on it still stands—I'm more of a copy editor than a writer.) —

1109:

I wrote a program that uses Wikidata to discover which categories contains at least three articles, of which a majority of them are Low-importance. You can find the

289: 2452:

to remove those. I hope that transcluding these two categories the entire segment under WP:Pharmacology would be of interest to people interested in WP:Medicine.

285: 1106:

scientific journals). Knowing those categories we can filter those articles out, which then allows us to build a model on the articles we're more interested in.

866:

The 1.0 group needed to come up with a model that was "probably matters", whereas I only need a model that gives me "probably matters to my particular group".

276: 1745:

For organizational purposes, I think it would be better to only list them under pharmacology, I don't see any benefit from tagging them under both projects. --

458:

This is the accepted term across Knowledge. Will be pretty hard to change. From a broader perspective, importance and popularity are interchangeable concepts.

3500:

Restructured entire article and fleshed out data making it more palatable and practicable for a general audience. Thank you in advance for the reassessment!--

1851:

The only way to get non-overlapping categorization is to tell groups of editors that they may not share interests. This is not fair or reasonable to editors.

952:

Knowledge of course contain data on frequency of diseases. Usually this is found in the last paragraph of the lead and the epidemiology section of the body.

257: 3450:

Article expanded, I added many new sections, links and images, updated all references and improved the infobox. Thank you in advance for the reassessment!--

756:

With respect to "tooth decay" if affects 2.43 billion people making it a big deal. Refractive errors affect 1 to 2 billion and nearsightedness 1.5 billion.

301: 253: 1556:

would like to differ. I would like to know what others have to say in this regard. In any case, it should be clearly defined and added to the guidelines.

922:

you as a professional looking at this if you have ideas for big changes then please present them as alternative ways of doing this. Two issues above- the

1254: 1023: 768: 642: 84: 4023:

system estimates B-class, which I think is fair. I suspect that whether it would pass GA now would depend largely on how familiar the reviewer is with

3302:! Promoted to B class based on the broad coverage, the good prose, the excellent referencing, the perfect sectioning, and a recommendation from Rater. 1915:

As I think about this I think keeping medications within WPMED is a good idea. Stuff that is not a medication in use yet should not be part of WPMED.

1865:

WikiProject tagging (as you discovered) is almost always incomplete. There are also a huge number of articles that aren't tagged for any WikiProject.

567: 261: 241: 34: 3407:- Hi I have expanded this stub by adding new content and images and I would greatly appreciate it if it could get reassessed. Thank you in advance!-- 4455: 4450: 324: 280: 4135:

quoting the exact words out of that source? We've had significant problems with plagiarism and copyright violations from that source in the past.

4460: 4248: 425:

I'm thinking about figuring out how to change this, unless there's some reason to keep it that I don't know about. It's just not the right term.

2125:

You are mandating an unnecessary overlap of both the WikiProjects for major part of WP:Pharmacology barring the few categories of transclusion.

531:

and why I'm the one working on this, as part of my PhD I studied using machine learning to predict article quality and helped develop parts of

3181:, B class anyway. While the article needs some work, I am confident that this work will not change these rather blunt assessment categories. 1384:

is lower in both measures, 410 views/day (87th percentile) and 66 inlinks (61st percentile), which our model then predicts as High-importance.

3955: 1257:

is on there because it's a government agency, but its High-importance rating seems reasonable to me given its relevance to medicine. Cheers,

563:

yet decided, if you have ideas (e.g. "these important medical topics have a specific property in Wikidata") I'd be happy to hear about them.

320: 90: 898:

I do not recall anyone proposing a serious project to post any prevalence database to Wikidata. I might have happened and maybe I forgot.

598:

82 High-importance articles are predicted to be Low-importance. In the interest of space I won't list them all, here are four examples:

187: 17: 3431:! Promoted to B class based on the broad coverage of the topic, the good prose, the good referencing, and a recommendation from Rater. 2252:

I strongly agree that drugs should be tagged with the med wikiproject. Many pages are in multiple wikiprojects so not an issue at all.

3789: 4377:, not really, but being a rare disease does. Being common in "certain populations" doesn't make a disease relatively common overall. 3723:- I have significantly expanded this article, added several pictures representing specific populations, and reviewed/added citations. 2778:, the current version contains six (very amply cited) sentences. Less than 10 sentences is one rule of thumb for identifying stubs. 1524:

I think that we need to define clearly whether drug related articles (belonging to WikiProject Pharmacology) should be tagged under

2634:- significant updates, notably adding AHA guidelines + illustrations + other high quality sources added. Currently rated start. -- 4028: 2739: 4279:. Thank you for the really substantial improvements and your dedication to using review articles. If you want to consider the 2720:- entire revision, adding guidelines and systematic reviews on RCTs refs + illustration. Not previously rated by any project. -- 1548:

are parameters that are supposed to be a part of practically any drug related article. But does that warrant an inclusion under

4151: 2957: 2499: 2430: 2371: 2203: 2112: 2043: 1987: 1928: 1630: 1604: 1460: 1329: 1173: 1083: 965: 787: 617: 623:

306 Mid-importance articles are predicted to be Top-importance. Again I won't list them all, here are four examples of these:

2311:. Some people like to think that drugs that are in pre-clinical stage are not being tagged under WP:MED. Let me mention that 2263: 237: 181: 145: 30: 1372:

with 961 views/day (over the past four weeks) which puts it in the 94th percentile. When it comes to inlinks, the lowest is

1232:

will solve the issue of overlap between WikiProjects and/or task forces, but it might help us enough to get useful results.

3673: 3087: 1775:

or anything else – then they should tag them. It doesn't actually matter whether any other group wants to work on them.

440: 315: 79: 607: 602: 120: 3869:- this article was originally a stub but I have added significant additions, sections and clarified previous language. 1854:

Discrete, non-overlapping categorization will produce stupid results in the case of cross-disciplinary subjects, e.g.,

3936: 3866: 3318: 3199: 2881: 2503: 2434: 2375: 2207: 2116: 2047: 1991: 1932: 1634: 1608: 1464: 1333: 1177: 1087: 969: 791: 70: 873:

There was some talk of putting disease prevalence data onto Wikidata, but I don't know the status of that project.

4354: 4006: 1442:

Remember how we describe articles of top importance is "Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to medicine.

1502:

Ah no, I have not gotten in touch with them, but that is a great idea, thanks for bringing their name up! Cheers,

3369: 3267:! Promoted to Start class based on the decent prose, the lack of sectioning, and the amount of relevant content. 3142: 3137:- Significant article expansion with almost complete overhaul and revision. Updated references and illustrations 497:, which is much more accurate. But changing it would require editing tens of thousands of pages, so we didn't. 4082:

Thank you. I'm just now learning how to rate well so I wasn't confident in rating (at the point I posted that).

4001:- I'd like a ballpark as to how far I am from GA status, and I don't think a C rating reflects that. Thank you. 3240: 364: 3939:, where I just added a bunch of links. I'm not holding that up as a perfect job, but it's better than it was. 3412: 3095: 2915: 2448: 2444: 687: 2922:

2016 data release showing null effect. Controversial topic missing most medical advances since 2015. Separate

1666:

as norm (since drugs are essentially meant to be for medical use), it would perhaps be more meaningful to add

4280: 4159: 3541: 3361: 3283: 2554:

significant update including editing of citations as article was flagged as having too many primary sources

2473: 2408: 2349: 2294: 2241: 2146: 2082: 2021: 1965: 1906: 1832: 4431: 4417: 4402: 4367: 4340: 4312: 4293: 4260: 4234: 4206: 4187: 4163: 4144: 4112: 4091: 4077: 4059: 4040: 4010: 3991: 3967: 3948: 3925: 3906: 3878: 3852: 3820: 3801: 3788:

This has previously been assessed as B-class, which is the highest rating available through this process.

3783: 3764: 3732: 3713: 3685: 3666: 3648: 3629: 3601: 3581: 3553: 3534: 3509: 3483: 3459: 3440: 3416: 3397: 3373: 3354: 3330: 3311: 3276: 3252: 3233: 3190: 3166: 3127: 3099: 3080: 3056: 3037: 3009: 2990: 2969: 2950: 2935: 2908: 2894: 2870: 2846: 2823: 2808: 2787: 2770: 2751: 2729: 2710: 2686: 2667: 2643: 2624: 2600: 2581: 2563: 2545: 2507: 2477: 2438: 2412: 2379: 2353: 2298: 2267: 2245: 2211: 2150: 2120: 2086: 2051: 2025: 1995: 1969: 1936: 1910: 1879: 1836: 1784: 1754: 1731: 1701: 1638: 1612: 1580: 1511: 1490: 1468: 1432: 1337: 1300: 1266: 1210: 1181: 1150: 1091: 1062: 1039: 1009: 973: 940: 911: 886: 861: 795: 748: 713: 506: 468: 444: 405: 4427: 4398: 4336: 4289: 4230: 4183: 4140: 4073: 4036: 3987: 3944: 3902: 3848: 3797: 3760: 3728: 3709: 3662: 3636: 3625: 3577: 3248: 3229: 3186: 3162: 3123: 3076: 3033: 2986: 2946: 2904: 2866: 2834: 2819: 2783: 2747: 2706: 2663: 2620: 2577: 2541: 2308: 1875: 1780: 1727: 1617:

Since we include other treatments such as surgery within WPMED we may as well keep including medications.

1486: 1312:

Changed breastfeeding to top. Yellow fever is rare in most of the world. As is typhoid fever and cholera.

1206: 1034: 935: 906: 882: 744: 502: 401: 4155: 3779: 3644: 3597: 2877: 2804: 2766: 2717: 2677:- significant updates to article and references. Had not been previously rated on WikiProject Medicine. 1750: 1698: 1577: 126: 436: 4108: 3365: 3138: 2842: 2631: 2220:

consideration and avoids the unnecessary overwork of adding WP:MED to medicine (drug) related pages.

428: 368: 3640: 2974: 2961: 1589: 4308: 4087: 4055: 3549: 3474:! Promoted to C class based on the decent coverage and prose, but not to B based on the structure. 3408: 3149: 3115: 3091: 2965: 2495: 2426: 2367: 2199: 2108: 2039: 1983: 1924: 1859: 1626: 1600: 1456: 1325: 1169: 1079: 961: 923: 783: 60: 488: 453: 432: 4300: 4202: 2596: 2559: 2454: 2389: 2330: 2275: 2257: 2222: 2127: 2063: 2002: 1946: 1887: 1813: 1070:

If only the items in that list were clickable and I would fix them. Can you make them clickable?

463: 370: 75: 1253:

Please do let me know if there are issues with the list I have. I noticed for instance that the

1288: 520: 4423: 4394: 4332: 4285: 4226: 4179: 4136: 4069: 4032: 3983: 3940: 3898: 3844: 3816: 3793: 3756: 3748: 3724: 3705: 3681: 3658: 3621: 3573: 3530: 3479: 3455: 3436: 3393: 3350: 3326: 3307: 3272: 3244: 3225: 3182: 3153: 3119: 3072: 3029: 2982: 2942: 2931: 2900: 2862: 2815: 2794: 2779: 2743: 2725: 2702: 2682: 2659: 2639: 2616: 2573: 2537: 1871: 1855: 1789: 1776: 1723: 1507: 1497: 1482: 1428: 1420: 1412: 1296: 1262: 1202: 1146: 1126: 1122: 1058: 1027: 1005: 996: 928: 899: 891: 878: 874: 867: 857: 810: 740: 709: 700: 677: 612: 536: 498: 397: 56: 4050:- Not my article and I haven't been working on it, but it doesn't seem to be a stub anymore. 2303:

I feel that there is a strong reason to define guidelines about co-tagging of articles under

4256: 3775: 3617: 3593: 3134: 3052: 3005: 2800: 2775: 2762: 2674: 1761: 1746: 1679: 1558: 1351: 632: 587: 582: 366: 337: 648:

1,002 Low-importance articles are predicted to be High-importance. Here are four examples:

415:

I'm a physician who has just started thinking about editing medicine wikipedia articles --

4128: 4104: 3963: 3921: 3874: 3654: 3505: 3497: 2926:

page and treatment pages also exists. Please consider regrade to C and increase priority.

2890: 2838: 1381: 1313: 673:

Lastly, 60 Low-importance articles are predicted to be Top-importance. Four of those are:

173: 870:

should be a top- or high-importance article overall, but I don't happen to care about it.

1316:

affects 1 in 100,000 people thus not of high importance. Vasodilation is not a disease.

539:

and created lists of articles that are good candidates for quality rating reassessment (

4413: 4388:

instead, because its primary uses (for WPMED) are to decide which articles go into the

4363: 4328: 4304: 4083: 4065: 4051: 4002: 3916:- I initially wrote this article and would appreciate an initial assessment! Thank you 3913: 3771: 3569: 3545: 3447: 3287: 2758: 2487: 2418: 2384: 2359: 2191: 2100: 2031: 1975: 1941: 1916: 1618: 1592: 1553: 1448: 1361: 1317: 1161: 1134: 1071: 953: 814: 775: 736: 657: 385: 3753:

Knowledge:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Diseases or disorders or syndromes

704:

WikiProject Medicine think, please pitch in with your thoughts and comments! Regards,

535:

to enable it to make article quality predictions. We've previously collaborated with

4444: 4389: 4222: 4198: 3221: 3204: 2997: 2592: 2569: 2555: 2304: 2253: 1804:

to them serves a better purpose of helping the interested users to find the articles.

1549: 1525: 1478: 726: 477: 459: 3639:- Significant updates, article expanded, and not yet rated on WikiProject Medicine. 3931: 3836: 3812: 3701: 3677: 3526: 3475: 3451: 3432: 3389: 3346: 3322: 3303: 3268: 2927: 2735: 2721: 2678: 2635: 2588: 1503: 1474: 1424: 1369: 1292: 1258: 1142: 1067: 1054: 1024:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Medicine/Task_forces#List_of_WikiProject_Medicine_task_forces

1016: 1001: 918: 853: 729:

project? I think that group is largely inactive, but there's been some talk about

719: 705: 577: 528: 4358:

don't have doctors. Does lack of medical attention make a topic lower-importance?

1974:

WPPHARM contains a lot of early research chemicals that are not yet medications.

1160:

Looking at most of those and they should be recategorized as low importance IMO.

4276: 4252: 4194: 4047: 3998: 3048: 3025: 3001: 730: 592: 4422:

If you think it makes more sense to be Mid-importance, I've no real objection.

3959: 3917: 3894: 3870: 3588: 3501: 2919: 2886: 1796: 1377: 163: 945:

A number of us are working on an infobox update. You can see an example here

824:

that lists 134 candidates for reassessment, and I'll try to go through those.

4409: 4374: 4359: 4016: 3840: 3808: 2977:, thanks for your work. You might find some ideas for further expansion in 1768: 699:

importance rating is correct (e.g. before I learned that our model predicts

692: 662: 1201:(but that's terribly WPMED-specific when you're building a general tool). 223: 2358:

Have removed those four. Yes the guidelines are not consistently applied.

733:

a subset of Knowledge, and your approach might make a good way to do that.

3720: 3404: 1380:

has 1,326 views/day (96th percentile) and 960 inlinks (97th percentile).

1049: 821: 682: 667: 652: 637: 627: 4178:

B class. There is still a lot of room for improvement in this article.

4019:, it is currently listed as C-class, as you noted in your request. The 3148:

Extensive use of primary sources, off-topic content, and problems with

2551: 1373: 4131:, would you do me a favor and make sure that the DSM-5 description is 3152:

and unencyclopedic tone make the current C-class assessment correct.

1858:(is that MILHIST or WPMED? Your proposed system only permits one) or 1528:

as well, and if so, in which specific cases. Clinical parameters like

4100: 2324: 2320: 2316: 2312: 1772: 532: 394:

this talk-page discussion, which contains the magic code for the bot

1658:

I think that the guidelines can be defined. We can include a field

1588:

I do not have a strong position one way or the other. Our guideline

771:

is local in scope (ie US importance) thus it is not top importance.

157: 139: 4020: 1350: 550:

We are interested in making article importance predictions and as

1870:

In short, it doesn't work that way, and it won't work that way.

759:

Major trauma is the 5th and 7th leading causes of death globally.

573:

Four Top-importance articles are predicted to be Mid-importance:

2417:

I do not support such a change. I am not sure what the benefit?

1048:

Thought I'd also follow up here and mention that I went through

946: 762:

Agree abortion should be top importance and adjusted it to such.

739:, is anyone else active in article assessment work these days? 185:. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at 4068:, you are welcome to re-rate articles yourself, if you'd like. 371: 331: 102: 25: 1795:

I was trying to look up and develop some articles related to

1647:, we include surgical topics under WikiProject Medicine. Had 3893:

C-class. Thank you for your improvements to this article, @

2837:- article expanded, references updated, illustration added. 222: 1662:

under WikiProject Pharmacology. Rather than including the

1022:

page templates. For medicine, a list of task forces is at

3839:, if you get a moment, could you look at the ref used in 1444:

Strong interest from non-professionals around the world.

519:

Hello everyone! I'm currently working on a project with

1423:

as well, since we've all been discussing this. Cheers,

1121:

for the feedback and interest in this project! Pinging

396:. Once the code exists, it's easy to set up the bot. 393: 3653:

This has already achieved GA-class. Congratulations,

411:

Change "Importance" to "Popularity" or something else

1283:

User:SuggestBot/Suggestions for WikiProject Medicine

1116:

User:SuggestBot/Suggestions for WikiProject Medicine

3792:is the next step, if you want to take it that far. 3620:, thank you for your improvements to that article. 2979:

Knowledge:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles

877:, do you remember that? Did anything come of it? 1714:group's purview. WikiProjects don't own articles. 4025:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) 3045:Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Macau) 2924:Controversies related to chronic fatigue syndrome 1355:Percentiles for inlinks and average article views 422:How about "low popularity"? Or some other term? 753:I am of course interested in article assessment. 3000:- New article. Not sure on including his here. 2981:. This article is correctly rated as C-class. 2447:is for drugs that never made it to market, and 1706:I don't feel like you understand this system. 765:Agree that the 4 high importance should be low. 3843:? That paper appears to have been retracted. 2572:, I've re-assessed it as B-class. Thank you. 525:automated classification of article importance 2099:We achieve the same thing by what we do now. 1376:with 804, putting it in the 97th percentile. 8: 4225:, thank you for your work on this article. 2328:the ones tagged only with WP:Pharmacology. 515:WikiProject Medicine and importance ratings 1677:and alike under WikiProject Pharmacology. 1673:We can additionally introduce fields like 769:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 643:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 426: 134: 4007:List of articles that I have screwed over 1197:is a way to find things that ought to be 119:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 543:is an older one on meta), most recently 4249:Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease 1655:tagged them under WikiProject Medicine. 250:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) 136: 2734:Someone already rated it as C class. 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 494: 389: 3956:Artificial intelligence in healthcare 2960:Article expanded, references updated 2190:There is nothing wrong with overlap. 7: 1651:existed, possibly we would not have 108: 106: 2880:- article expanded and merged with 188:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine 125:It is of interest to the following 33:for discussing improvements to the 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine 3790:Knowledge:Good article nominations 1643:I think that since we do not have 24: 2058:Category:early research chemicals 1848:(2) page views for the talk page. 1552:as well? I do not think so while 179:This page is within the scope of 4318: 4266: 4212: 4169: 4118: 4064:This was re-rated as C-class. @ 3973: 3884: 3826: 3738: 3691: 3607: 3559: 3516: 3465: 3422: 3379: 3336: 3293: 3258: 3211: 3172: 3105: 3062: 3015: 2852: 2740:Knowledge:Biomedical information 2692: 2649: 2606: 1193:for most of them. In practice, 523:where we are studying how to do 388:to tagging biographies with the 336: 166: 156: 138: 107: 50:Click here to start a new topic. 4456:NA-importance medicine articles 4451:Project-Class medicine articles 4152:Cardiovascular disease in women 2958:Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans 1291:since he requested it. Cheers, 618:Hepatitis C and HIV coinfection 384:The Earwig has very kindly set 35:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment 4461:All WikiProject Medicine pages 3220:B/mid. Thanks for your work, 1811:At least that is what I feel. 1802:Category:xth century physician 725:Are you familiar with the old 197:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine 1: 4341:06:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC) 4275:B class. Very nicely done, @ 4235:23:23, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 4207:14:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC) 4188:06:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC) 3968:15:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC) 3926:06:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC) 3784:15:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 3733:14:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC) 3714:23:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 3686:19:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC) 3674:Intestinal pseudo-obstruction 3667:23:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 3630:23:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 3582:23:30, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 3460:02:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC) 3331:15:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC) 3234:00:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC) 3191:23:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 3167:23:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 3128:23:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 3088:WHO Surgical Safety Checklist 3081:23:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 3038:23:50, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2991:23:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2951:23:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2909:23:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2871:23:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2824:04:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC) 2809:02:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC) 2788:23:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2752:23:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2711:23:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2668:23:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2625:23:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2582:23:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC) 2546:23:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC) 493:, the other possible name is 380:Getting a bot to tag articles 200:Template:WikiProject Medicine 47:Put new text under old text. 4313:14:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 4294:03:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 4261:02:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 4145:05:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC) 4092:20:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC) 4078:05:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC) 4060:03:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC) 3992:05:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC) 3949:04:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 3907:03:52, 16 January 2023 (UTC) 3879:19:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC) 3821:22:48, 2 December 2021 (UTC) 3417:07:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC) 3374:01:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC) 3253:16:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC) 2730:15:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC) 2687:14:59, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 2644:17:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC) 2601:17:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 2564:17:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 469:21:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 445:04:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC) 406:01:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC) 4041:06:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 4011:21:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 3937:Coronary perfusion pressure 3867:Coronary Perfusion Pressure 3853:06:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 3802:05:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 3765:05:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC) 3319:Respiratory syncytial virus 3200:Sensory processing disorder 3024:, start class. Thank you, 2882:Neutralisation (immunology) 1862:(is that WPMED or WPHIST?). 527:. In case you're wondering 242:WPMED Newsletter and signup 55:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 4477: 4432:06:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC) 4418:03:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC) 4403:03:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC) 4368:00:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 4355:Tropical ataxic neuropathy 4349:Tropical ataxic neuropathy 4164:15:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC) 4113:20:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC) 3649:02:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC) 3602:17:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC) 2895:06:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC) 2847:14:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 2771:07:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 2299:14:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 2268:01:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 2246:02:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 2212:00:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 2151:19:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 2121:19:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 2087:18:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 2056:If we add a category like 2052:18:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 2026:16:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 1996:16:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 1970:13:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 1937:23:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC) 1911:18:20, 15 April 2017 (UTC) 1880:17:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC) 1837:15:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC) 1785:22:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC) 1755:03:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC) 1732:22:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC) 1702:18:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC) 1639:18:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC) 1613:18:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC) 1581:18:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC) 1512:21:02, 27 April 2017 (UTC) 1491:02:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 1469:17:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC) 1433:17:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC) 1338:02:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC) 1301:20:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 1267:16:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC) 1211:04:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC) 1182:17:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC) 1151:17:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC) 1092:19:44, 28 March 2017 (UTC) 1063:16:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC) 1050:this work list of articles 1040:18:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC) 1010:16:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC) 974:00:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC) 941:22:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 912:22:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 887:22:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 862:19:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC) 796:01:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 749:01:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 714:21:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC) 507:01:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC) 246:Manual of style (medicine) 3554:08:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC) 3535:10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 3510:20:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC) 3484:10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 3441:10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 3398:10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 3355:10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 3312:10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 3277:10:49, 17 June 2021 (UTC) 3207:19:48, 14 July 2020‎ UTC 3100:20:57, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 3057:11:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 3047:- Expanded a slight bit. 3010:11:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 2970:09:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC) 2508:22:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC) 2478:06:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC) 1360:Thanks for the feedback, 151: 133: 85:Be welcoming to newcomers 2936:15:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC) 2916:Chronic fatigue syndrome 2449:Category:Withdrawn drugs 2445:Category:Abandoned drugs 2439:19:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC) 2413:19:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC) 2380:15:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC) 2354:11:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC) 2030:Not sure what you mean? 688:Medicare (United States) 608:1881–96 cholera pandemic 603:1852–60 cholera pandemic 547:from about a month ago. 4281:Knowledge:Good articles 3542:Sickle cell retinopathy 3362:Neurogenic claudication 3284:Foreign body aspiration 3114:, B class. Thank you, 2701:, C class. Thank you. 483:you for the message... 3637:body image disturbance 2835:Cardiopulmonary bypass 1356: 227: 80:avoid personal attacks 2878:Neutralizing antibody 2718:Very-low-calorie diet 1477:, have you talked to 1354: 298:Patrol recent changes 281:resources for editors 226: 3841:Heartburn#cite ref-8 2632:Intermittent fasting 254:List of participants 232:WikiProject Medicine 182:WikiProject Medicine 3241:José María Esquerdo 1860:history of medicine 1764:trying to organize? 1710:articles are under 1649:WikiProject Surgery 1645:WikiProject Surgery 1546:Mechanism of action 924:Affordable Care Act 4301:Carcinoid syndrome 4031:-focused section. 1357: 306:Requested articles 228: 121:content assessment 91:dispute resolution 52: 2591:recently updated 2061:What do you say? 1856:military medicine 1760:What exactly are 1542:Drug interactions 1534:Contraindications 1141:as well. Cheers, 868:Leonardo da Vinci 701:Chukwuedu Nwokolo 678:Alexander Fleming 613:Google Flu Trends 537:User:WhatamIdoing 466: 447: 431:comment added by 377: 376: 219: 218: 215: 214: 211: 210: 203:medicine articles 101: 100: 71:Assume good faith 48: 4468: 4387: 4383: 4380:I wish that the 4326: 4322: 4321: 4274: 4270: 4269: 4220: 4216: 4215: 4177: 4173: 4172: 4126: 4122: 4121: 3981: 3977: 3976: 3892: 3888: 3887: 3834: 3830: 3829: 3746: 3742: 3741: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3615: 3611: 3610: 3567: 3563: 3562: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3473: 3469: 3468: 3430: 3426: 3425: 3387: 3383: 3382: 3344: 3340: 3339: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3266: 3262: 3261: 3219: 3215: 3214: 3180: 3176: 3175: 3159: 3135:Pheochromocytoma 3113: 3109: 3108: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3023: 3019: 3018: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2798: 2700: 2696: 2695: 2675:Postpartum blues 2657: 2653: 2652: 2614: 2610: 2609: 2492: 2476: 2470: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2423: 2411: 2405: 2402: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2364: 2352: 2346: 2343: 2340: 2337: 2334: 2297: 2291: 2288: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2244: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2196: 2149: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2105: 2085: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2070: 2067: 2036: 2024: 2018: 2015: 2012: 2009: 2006: 1980: 1968: 1962: 1959: 1956: 1953: 1950: 1921: 1909: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1891: 1835: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1700: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1623: 1597: 1579: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1501: 1453: 1417: 1366: 1322: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1166: 1139: 1131: 1076: 1037: 1032: 1020: 958: 938: 933: 909: 904: 818: 780: 588:Refractive error 583:Near-sightedness 568:importance scale 552:our project page 496: 492: 481: 464: 457: 391: 372: 340: 332: 205: 204: 201: 198: 195: 176: 171: 170: 169: 160: 153: 152: 142: 135: 112: 111: 110: 103: 26: 4476: 4475: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4467: 4466: 4465: 4441: 4440: 4385: 4384:parameter said 4381: 4351: 4319: 4317: 4267: 4265: 4245: 4213: 4211: 4170: 4168: 4119: 4117: 4009: 3974: 3972: 3885: 3883: 3863: 3827: 3825: 3739: 3737: 3692: 3690: 3608: 3606: 3560: 3558: 3517: 3515: 3498:Hip dislocation 3494: 3466: 3464: 3423: 3421: 3380: 3378: 3366:Anonymous221100 3337: 3335: 3294: 3292: 3288:User: Logan6465 3259: 3257: 3212: 3210: 3173: 3171: 3157: 3139:Katherine Ilona 3106: 3104: 3063: 3061: 3016: 3014: 2853: 2851: 2792: 2693: 2691: 2650: 2648: 2607: 2605: 2534: 2488: 2468: 2465: 2462: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2419: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2360: 2344: 2341: 2338: 2335: 2332: 2329: 2309:WP:Pharmacology 2289: 2286: 2283: 2280: 2277: 2274: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2192: 2141: 2138: 2135: 2132: 2129: 2126: 2101: 2077: 2074: 2071: 2068: 2065: 2062: 2032: 2016: 2013: 2010: 2007: 2004: 2001: 1976: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1951: 1948: 1945: 1917: 1901: 1898: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1886: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1812: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1681: 1678: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1619: 1593: 1572: 1569: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1557: 1538:Adverse effects 1522: 1495: 1449: 1413: 1382:Hurler syndrome 1362: 1318: 1314:Hurler syndrome 1199:|importance=Low 1187:|importance=Low 1162: 1135: 1127: 1111:the entire list 1072: 1035: 1028: 1014: 954: 936: 929: 907: 900: 808: 776: 633:Crohn's disease 517: 486: 475: 451: 413: 382: 373: 367: 345: 330: 329: 234: 202: 199: 196: 193: 192: 174:Medicine portal 172: 167: 165: 97: 96: 66: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4474: 4472: 4464: 4463: 4458: 4453: 4443: 4442: 4439: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4378: 4350: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4244: 4241: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4149: 4148: 4147: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4005: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3914:Platform trial 3911: 3910: 3909: 3862: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3772:Cardiac arrest 3769: 3768: 3767: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3493: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3448:Genodermatosis 3445: 3444: 3443: 3409:Redvelvetcake5 3402: 3401: 3400: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3116:Winged Scapula 3092:Winged Scapula 3085: 3084: 3083: 3071:, stub class. 3042: 3041: 3040: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2759:Ramon Guiteras 2756: 2755: 2754: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1863: 1852: 1849: 1844:day, and just 1809: 1805: 1793: 1765: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1719: 1715: 1671: 1656: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1415:Blue Rasberry 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1358: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1310: 1287:Also: pinging 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1129:Blue Rasberry 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1030:Blue Rasberry 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 950: 931:Blue Rasberry 916: 915: 914: 902:Blue Rasberry 896: 871: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 801: 800: 799: 798: 772: 766: 763: 760: 757: 754: 737:User:Doc James 734: 723: 696: 695: 690: 685: 680: 671: 670: 665: 660: 658:JAMA (journal) 655: 646: 645: 640: 635: 630: 621: 620: 615: 610: 605: 596: 595: 590: 585: 580: 521:Aaron Halfaker 516: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 472: 471: 412: 409: 386:User:EarwigBot 381: 378: 375: 374: 369: 365: 363: 360: 359: 351: 350: 347: 346: 341: 335: 327: 318: 314: 308: 304: 296: 283: 277:Article alerts 275: 269: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 230: 229: 221: 220: 217: 216: 213: 212: 209: 208: 206: 178: 177: 161: 149: 148: 143: 131: 130: 124: 113: 99: 98: 95: 94: 87: 82: 73: 67: 65: 64: 53: 44: 43: 40: 39: 38: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4473: 4462: 4459: 4457: 4454: 4452: 4449: 4448: 4446: 4433: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4391: 4379: 4376: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4369: 4365: 4361: 4356: 4348: 4342: 4338: 4334: 4330: 4325: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4310: 4306: 4302: 4299: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4282: 4278: 4273: 4264: 4263: 4262: 4258: 4254: 4250: 4247: 4246: 4243:2023 requests 4242: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4219: 4210: 4209: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4176: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4156:Sahrishmasood 4153: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4125: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4099: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4080: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3997: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3980: 3971: 3970: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3933: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3912: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3891: 3882: 3881: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3865: 3864: 3861:2022 requests 3860: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3833: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3810: 3807: 3803: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3786: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3770: 3766: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3745: 3736: 3735: 3734: 3730: 3726: 3722: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3698: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3660: 3656: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3614: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3590: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3566: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3523: 3514: 3513: 3511: 3507: 3503: 3499: 3496: 3495: 3492:2021 requests 3491: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3472: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3429: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3403: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3386: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3343: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3300: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3265: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3218: 3209: 3208: 3206: 3201: 3198: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3179: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3112: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3069: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3022: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2998:Health Bureau 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2976: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2883: 2879: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2859: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2833: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2796: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2699: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2676: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2656: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2613: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2532:2020 requests 2531: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2491: 2486:Sounds good. 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2472: 2471: 2450: 2446: 2443:Just to add: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2422: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2406: 2386: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2363: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2296: 2293: 2292: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2262: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2195: 2188: 2152: 2148: 2145: 2144: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2104: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2081: 2080: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2035: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2020: 2019: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1979: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1943: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1920: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1905: 1904: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1850: 1847: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1830: 1810: 1806: 1803: 1798: 1794: 1791: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1720: 1716: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1697: 1696: 1676: 1672: 1657: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1622: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1596: 1590: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1576: 1575: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1519: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1499: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1479:User:Walkerma 1476: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1452: 1445: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1416: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1365: 1359: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1321: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1285: 1284: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1165: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1138: 1132: 1130: 1124: 1118: 1117: 1112: 1107: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1075: 1069: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1041: 1038: 1033: 1031: 1025: 1018: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1003: 998: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 957: 951: 948: 944: 943: 942: 939: 934: 932: 925: 920: 917: 913: 910: 905: 903: 897: 893: 890: 889: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 869: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 823: 816: 812: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 779: 773: 770: 767: 764: 761: 758: 755: 752: 751: 750: 746: 742: 738: 735: 732: 728: 724: 721: 718: 717: 716: 715: 711: 707: 702: 694: 691: 689: 686: 684: 681: 679: 676: 675: 674: 669: 666: 664: 661: 659: 656: 654: 651: 650: 649: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 625: 624: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 600: 599: 594: 591: 589: 586: 584: 581: 579: 576: 575: 574: 571: 569: 564: 560: 556: 553: 548: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 514: 508: 504: 500: 490: 485: 484: 479: 474: 473: 470: 467: 461: 455: 450: 449: 448: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 423: 420: 416: 410: 408: 407: 403: 399: 395: 387: 379: 362: 361: 358: 357: 353: 352: 349: 348: 344: 339: 334: 333: 328: 326: 322: 317: 313: 309: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 284:Articles for 282: 278: 274: 270: 267: 263: 259: 258:Popular pages 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 233: 225: 207: 190: 189: 184: 183: 175: 164: 162: 159: 155: 154: 150: 147: 144: 141: 137: 132: 128: 122: 118: 114: 105: 104: 92: 88: 86: 83: 81: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 62: 58: 57:Learn to edit 54: 51: 46: 45: 42: 41: 36: 32: 28: 27: 19: 4424:WhatamIdoing 4395:WhatamIdoing 4382:|importance= 4352: 4333:WhatamIdoing 4323: 4286:WhatamIdoing 4271: 4227:WhatamIdoing 4217: 4180:WhatamIdoing 4174: 4137:WhatamIdoing 4132: 4123: 4070:WhatamIdoing 4033:WhatamIdoing 3984:WhatamIdoing 3978: 3941:WhatamIdoing 3899:WhatamIdoing 3889: 3845:WhatamIdoing 3831: 3794:WhatamIdoing 3757:WhatamIdoing 3749:Joshua Cho28 3743: 3725:Joshua Cho28 3706:WhatamIdoing 3696: 3659:WhatamIdoing 3622:WhatamIdoing 3612: 3574:WhatamIdoing 3564: 3521: 3470: 3427: 3384: 3341: 3298: 3263: 3245:Zedgamer9128 3243:newly added 3226:WhatamIdoing 3216: 3183:WhatamIdoing 3177: 3154: 3150:WP:NOTADVICE 3120:WhatamIdoing 3110: 3073:WhatamIdoing 3067: 3030:WhatamIdoing 3020: 2983:WhatamIdoing 2943:WhatamIdoing 2901:WhatamIdoing 2863:WhatamIdoing 2857: 2816:WhatamIdoing 2795:WhatamIdoing 2780:WhatamIdoing 2744:WhatamIdoing 2703:WhatamIdoing 2697: 2660:WhatamIdoing 2654: 2617:WhatamIdoing 2611: 2589:Ketoacidosis 2574:WhatamIdoing 2538:WhatamIdoing 2535: 2489: 2455: 2420: 2390: 2361: 2331: 2276: 2260: 2223: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2128: 2102: 2064: 2057: 2033: 2003: 1977: 1947: 1918: 1888: 1872:WhatamIdoing 1845: 1814: 1801: 1790:WhatamIdoing 1777:WhatamIdoing 1744: 1724:WhatamIdoing 1711: 1707: 1680: 1674: 1660:medicine=yes 1652: 1648: 1644: 1620: 1594: 1559: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1530:Medical uses 1529: 1523: 1498:WhatamIdoing 1483:WhatamIdoing 1450: 1443: 1441: 1421:WhatamIdoing 1414: 1370:Vasodilation 1363: 1319: 1286: 1279: 1203:WhatamIdoing 1191:|society=yes 1163: 1136: 1128: 1123:WhatamIdoing 1119: 1108: 1104: 1073: 1068:User:Nettrom 1029: 997:Bluerasberry 955: 930: 901: 892:WhatamIdoing 879:WhatamIdoing 811:WhatamIdoing 777: 741:WhatamIdoing 697: 672: 647: 622: 597: 578:Major trauma 572: 565: 561: 557: 549: 518: 499:WhatamIdoing 427:— Preceding 424: 421: 417: 414: 398:WhatamIdoing 390:|society=yes 383: 354: 342: 319:Articles by 311: 310: 273:How to help: 272: 271: 238:Project Page 235: 231: 186: 180: 127:WikiProjects 117:project page 116: 29:This is the 4353:I made the 4195:Tetraplegia 4127:B class. @ 4048:Tuberculoma 3999:Tirzepatide 3835:C class. @ 3776:Vsnguyen.em 3747:C class. @ 3618:LCapistrano 3594:LCapistrano 2861:, B class. 2801:DocWatson42 2776:DocWatson42 2763:DocWatson42 2658:, B class. 1668:medicine=no 1520:Medications 731:sideloading 593:Tooth decay 312:Categories: 4445:Categories 4386:|priority= 4327:B class. @ 4221:B class. @ 4129:Joeception 4105:Joeception 4029:biomedical 3700:B class. @ 3655:Srobodao84 3641:Srobodao84 3616:B class. @ 3589:Pagophagia 3568:B class. @ 2920:PACE trial 2839:DLEMERGEBM 2615:, C class 1797:physicians 1378:Strychnine 495:|priority= 325:importance 302:sort stubs 262:Assessment 4329:JackNagam 4305:JackNagam 4084:Lalaithan 4066:Lalaithan 4052:Lalaithan 3982:B class. 3809:Heartburn 3570:TeHilla98 3546:TeHilla98 2975:WikiTegan 2962:WikiTegan 2490:Doc James 2421:Doc James 2362:Doc James 2254:Cas Liber 2194:Doc James 2103:Doc James 2034:Doc James 1978:Doc James 1919:Doc James 1769:Photoshop 1621:Doc James 1595:Doc James 1554:Doc James 1451:Doc James 1364:Doc James 1320:Doc James 1195:|society= 1164:Doc James 1137:Doc James 1074:Doc James 956:Doc James 815:Doc James 778:Doc James 693:Stem cell 663:MIND diet 545:this list 356:2007-2008 93:if needed 76:Be polite 31:talk page 4223:Tdaprano 4199:Tdaprano 3721:Cyanosis 3405:Benadryl 3222:Chibs007 3205:Chibs007 2593:Pattkait 2570:Pattkait 2556:Pattkait 2500:contribs 2431:contribs 2372:contribs 2264:contribs 2204:contribs 2113:contribs 2044:contribs 1988:contribs 1929:contribs 1631:contribs 1605:contribs 1461:contribs 1411:Pinging 1330:contribs 1174:contribs 1084:contribs 966:contribs 788:contribs 683:Euphoria 668:UpToDate 653:Ayurveda 638:Glucagon 628:Abortion 529:who I am 478:Jfdwolff 441:contribs 429:unsigned 343:Archives 294:orphaned 290:deletion 194:Medicine 146:Medicine 61:get help 4021:mw:ORES 3932:Bibeyjj 3837:CheckDO 3813:CheckDO 3702:CheckDO 3678:CheckDO 3527:Bibeyjj 3476:Bibeyjj 3452:Mavis67 3433:Bibeyjj 3390:Bibeyjj 3347:Bibeyjj 3323:ACMetro 3304:Bibeyjj 3269:Bibeyjj 3158:Georgia 2928:Amousey 2736:Signimu 2722:Signimu 2679:Mlshulk 2636:Signimu 2552:Ketosis 2317:ERA-63 1675:company 1504:Nettrom 1475:Nettrom 1425:Nettrom 1374:Melanin 1293:Nettrom 1259:Nettrom 1143:Nettrom 1055:Nettrom 1017:Nettrom 1002:Nettrom 919:Nettrom 854:Nettrom 720:Nettrom 706:Nettrom 489:SlamNo7 454:SlamNo7 433:SlamNo7 321:quality 316:Project 292:, and 286:cleanup 4390:WP:1.0 4277:Lyall0 4253:Lyall0 4101:Phobia 3049:Ominae 3026:Ominae 3002:Ominae 2325:ERB-79 2321:ERB-26 2313:ERA-45 2305:WP:MED 1808:helps. 1773:iPhone 1550:WP:MED 1526:WP:MED 1133:, and 1036:(talk) 937:(talk) 908:(talk) 727:WP:1.0 123:scale. 4003:X-750 3960:Daspj 3918:221MD 3895:221MD 3871:221MD 3502:Kgnwa 3155:Sandy 2887:Huhny 2504:email 2435:email 2385:James 2376:email 2208:email 2117:email 2048:email 1992:email 1942:James 1933:email 1635:email 1609:email 1465:email 1334:email 1289:Aaron 1178:email 1088:email 970:email 822:query 792:email 115:This 89:Seek 37:page. 16:< 4428:talk 4414:talk 4410:HLHJ 4399:talk 4375:HLHJ 4364:talk 4360:HLHJ 4337:talk 4324:Done 4309:talk 4290:talk 4272:Done 4257:talk 4231:talk 4218:Done 4203:talk 4184:talk 4175:Done 4160:talk 4141:talk 4124:Done 4109:talk 4088:talk 4074:talk 4056:talk 4037:talk 4017:X750 3988:talk 3979:Done 3964:talk 3945:talk 3922:talk 3903:talk 3890:Done 3875:talk 3849:talk 3832:Done 3817:talk 3798:talk 3780:talk 3761:talk 3744:Done 3729:talk 3710:talk 3697:Done 3682:talk 3663:talk 3645:talk 3626:talk 3613:Done 3598:talk 3578:talk 3565:Done 3550:talk 3531:talk 3522:Done 3506:talk 3480:talk 3471:Done 3456:talk 3437:talk 3428:Done 3413:talk 3394:talk 3385:Done 3370:talk 3351:talk 3342:Done 3327:talk 3308:talk 3299:Done 3273:talk 3264:Done 3249:talk 3230:talk 3217:Done 3187:talk 3178:Done 3163:Talk 3143:talk 3124:talk 3111:Done 3096:talk 3077:talk 3068:Done 3053:talk 3034:talk 3021:Done 3006:talk 2987:talk 2966:talk 2947:talk 2932:talk 2905:talk 2891:talk 2867:talk 2858:Done 2843:talk 2820:talk 2805:talk 2784:talk 2767:talk 2748:talk 2726:talk 2707:talk 2698:Done 2683:talk 2664:talk 2655:Done 2640:talk 2621:talk 2612:Done 2597:talk 2578:talk 2560:talk 2542:talk 2496:talk 2427:talk 2368:talk 2307:and 2258:talk 2200:talk 2109:talk 2040:talk 1984:talk 1925:talk 1876:talk 1781:talk 1751:talk 1728:talk 1653:also 1627:talk 1601:talk 1508:talk 1487:talk 1457:talk 1429:talk 1419:and 1326:talk 1309:use. 1297:talk 1263:talk 1207:talk 1189:and 1170:talk 1147:talk 1080:talk 1059:talk 1006:talk 962:talk 947:gout 883:talk 875:Lane 858:talk 813:and 784:talk 745:talk 710:talk 541:here 533:ORES 503:talk 465:T@lk 437:talk 402:talk 323:and 300:and 279:and 78:and 4133:not 3512:-- 3224:. 3165:) 1846:two 1771:or 1762:you 1712:any 1664:yes 1544:or 1255:CDC 460:JFW 266:Log 4447:: 4430:) 4416:) 4401:) 4366:) 4339:) 4311:) 4292:) 4259:) 4233:) 4205:) 4186:) 4162:) 4143:) 4111:) 4090:) 4076:) 4058:) 4039:) 3990:) 3966:) 3947:) 3924:) 3905:) 3897:. 3877:) 3851:) 3819:) 3800:) 3782:) 3763:) 3755:. 3731:) 3712:) 3684:) 3665:) 3657:. 3647:) 3628:) 3600:) 3580:) 3552:) 3533:) 3508:) 3482:) 3458:) 3439:) 3415:) 3396:) 3372:) 3353:) 3329:) 3310:) 3275:) 3251:) 3232:) 3189:) 3145:) 3126:) 3118:. 3098:) 3079:) 3055:) 3036:) 3028:. 3008:) 2989:) 2968:) 2949:) 2934:) 2907:) 2893:) 2869:) 2845:) 2822:) 2807:) 2786:) 2769:) 2750:) 2742:. 2728:) 2709:) 2685:) 2666:) 2642:) 2623:) 2599:) 2580:) 2562:) 2544:) 2506:) 2502:· 2498:· 2474:💬 2469:hu 2466:ns 2463:ta 2460:ip 2437:) 2433:· 2429:· 2409:💬 2404:hu 2401:ns 2398:ta 2395:ip 2378:) 2374:· 2370:· 2350:💬 2345:hu 2342:ns 2339:ta 2336:ip 2323:, 2319:, 2315:, 2295:💬 2290:hu 2287:ns 2284:ta 2281:ip 2266:) 2242:💬 2237:hu 2234:ns 2231:ta 2228:ip 2210:) 2206:· 2202:· 2147:💬 2142:hu 2139:ns 2136:ta 2133:ip 2119:) 2115:· 2111:· 2083:💬 2078:hu 2075:ns 2072:ta 2069:ip 2050:) 2046:· 2042:· 2022:💬 2017:hu 2014:ns 2011:ta 2008:ip 1994:) 1990:· 1986:· 1966:💬 1961:hu 1958:ns 1955:ta 1952:ip 1935:) 1931:· 1927:· 1907:💬 1902:hu 1899:ns 1896:ta 1893:ip 1878:) 1833:💬 1828:hu 1825:ns 1822:ta 1819:ip 1783:) 1753:) 1747:WS 1730:) 1708:No 1694:hu 1691:ns 1688:ta 1685:ip 1637:) 1633:· 1629:· 1611:) 1607:· 1603:· 1573:hu 1570:ns 1567:ta 1564:ip 1540:, 1536:, 1532:, 1510:) 1489:) 1467:) 1463:· 1459:· 1431:) 1336:) 1332:· 1328:· 1299:) 1265:) 1209:) 1180:) 1176:· 1172:· 1149:) 1125:, 1090:) 1086:· 1082:· 1061:) 1008:) 972:) 968:· 964:· 885:) 860:) 794:) 790:· 786:· 747:) 712:) 505:) 462:| 443:) 439:• 404:) 288:, 59:; 4426:( 4412:( 4397:( 4373:@ 4362:( 4335:( 4307:( 4288:( 4255:( 4229:( 4201:( 4182:( 4158:( 4139:( 4107:( 4086:( 4072:( 4054:( 4035:( 4015:@ 3986:( 3962:( 3943:( 3930:@ 3920:( 3901:( 3873:( 3847:( 3815:( 3796:( 3778:( 3759:( 3727:( 3708:( 3680:( 3661:( 3643:( 3624:( 3596:( 3576:( 3548:( 3529:( 3504:( 3478:( 3454:( 3435:( 3411:( 3392:( 3368:( 3349:( 3325:( 3306:( 3271:( 3247:( 3228:( 3185:( 3161:( 3141:( 3122:( 3094:( 3075:( 3051:( 3032:( 3004:( 2985:( 2964:( 2945:( 2930:( 2903:( 2889:( 2865:( 2841:( 2818:( 2803:( 2797:: 2793:@ 2782:( 2765:( 2746:( 2724:( 2705:( 2681:( 2662:( 2638:( 2619:( 2595:( 2576:( 2568:@ 2558:( 2540:( 2494:( 2457:D 2425:( 2392:D 2366:( 2333:D 2278:D 2261:· 2256:( 2225:D 2198:( 2130:D 2107:( 2066:D 2038:( 2005:D 1982:( 1949:D 1923:( 1890:D 1874:( 1816:D 1779:( 1749:( 1726:( 1682:D 1625:( 1599:( 1561:D 1506:( 1500:: 1496:@ 1485:( 1455:( 1427:( 1324:( 1295:( 1261:( 1205:( 1168:( 1145:( 1078:( 1057:( 1019:: 1015:@ 1004:( 960:( 881:( 856:( 817:: 809:@ 782:( 743:( 708:( 501:( 491:: 487:@ 480:: 476:@ 456:: 452:@ 435:( 400:( 268:) 264:( 191:. 129:: 63:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment - Knowledge

Index