Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force/Archive 1

3592:

under the "Policy" subsection. The countries that I have chosen are Ethiopia, Ghana, South Africa, and Tanzania. I chose those countries to focus on because from the research I have done, there is the most information available about those countries and/or they are places where fertility rates and maternal death rates are highest. Does anyone have any suggestions for alternate or additional countries to include? In the sections about each country, I am planning to include information on availability of birth control and social factors that impact family planning in addition to other basic statistics on maternal and child mortality rates. I am also planning to include data from studies that have been done on family planning issues in those countries. My sources will consist of scholarly articles and possibly newspaper articles. There will be a full list of the sources I have used in my preliminary research and more information about this project on my home page. Any feedback about this project would be appreciated. Thank you.

3739:

on the Programme of Action of the Cairo International Conference on Population and Development, etc. 3 Women's rights – El Salvador’s stance on world policies for women and a look at their own laws – like prenatal care, family planning education, birth control access 4 Men's rights – El Salvador’s stance on world policies for men and a look at their own laws – things like family planning education, access to condoms and spermicides, sperm donation 5 Youth rights and access – Education – Sexual education policies – What information, if any, do children receive and at what age? Contraceptive policies and availability 6 Gender equality and violence against women – What forms of gender-based violence are happening? – Rape 7 STD’s/STI’s/HIV/AIDS – Practices, polices, education, prevention 8 Issues

2799: 3724:

sexual violence/crime, legal and/or religious issues, education, activism, prenatal care and other issues surrounding pregnancy. Other than the Wiki article creation links and basic available information; Does anyone have any suggestions on the best way to structure an article? What about content? Is there something within this topic I should focus on more than another? For example, if you were reading an article, called Reproductive rights in El Salvador, what would you like and/or expect to see? What advice can you offer to a first time contributor? Thank you all for your time.

3006:{{cite journal |author=John Smith |year=2000 |title=How to Put Things into Other Things |journal=Journal of Foobar |volume=1 |issue=2 |pages=3–4 |arxiv=0123456789 |asin=0123456789 |bibcode=0123456789 |doi=0123456789 |jfm=0123456789 |jstor=0123456789 |lccn=0123456789 |isbn=0123456789 |issn=0123456789 |mr=0123456789 |oclc=0123456789 |ol=0123456789 |osti=0123456789 |rfc=0123456789 |pmc=0123456789 |pmid=0123456789 |ssrn=0123456789 |zbl=0123456789 |id={{para|id|____}} }} 35: 1670:). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found 4072: 2654: 3177: 3676: 659:. Correct use relates closely to effectiveness for user-dependent methods; I would like to see it just after effectiveness in those articles. Explaining what is involved with a method may also help readers understand potential complications or side effects, so it would be nice to have this section before the complications/side effect section. 2163: 647:, which has "effectiveness" near the top and "mechanism" near the bottom of the article. I believe effectiveness is one of the more important characteristics of user-dependent birth control methods, and would also like to see this section near the top of the article, right after "varieties". The "mechanisms" can go quite a bit further down ( 1581:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. 987:

wants to stay more "focused" than that, then it doesn't have to accept physiology articles. It can be WPMED without being RepMed. It is always useful to remember that project banners are not a replacement for categorization. If RepMed does not choose to be responsible for EPF, then it need not be included in RepMed's scope.

1944:. Since the article falls under the scope of this project, I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! 2571: 3051:, there is a great deal of content missing. I am interested in adding a major section to the page covering Family Planning in Muslim Communities. This topic is incredibly important as Islam, a religion which by its most conservative standards considers family planning solely in terms of the writings of the 3591:

I am planning on writing a new article titled "Family Planning in Sub Saharan Africa" for a Poverty, Justice, and Human Capabilities course that I am taking at Rice University. I am planning on focusing on a few countries, and I will add links to these countries to the current "Family Planning" page

3081:

I wanted to ask the WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force if there are any prominent sources or locations where related research has been completed? I do not plan on going too deeply into medical devices or procedures, but knowledge of commonly used contraception/abortion practices in

2526:

in the United States as a Medical Information Scientist. My intent is to provide information to the editors of Knowledge for their use in Cervarix related articles to help ensure that healthcare professionals in the United States receive accurate and balanced scientific information. I would like to

2386:, "Where there is a dispute over a name, editors should cite recognised authorities and organisations rather than conduct original research. Where there are lexical differences between the varieties of English, an international standard should be sought." The preferred names are those provided by the 851:

All of the articles you link here are already tagged by the main WPMED project. WPMED tends to define medicine fairly broadly, including, among other things, all medications, all medical conditions, and laws and government policies that affect medical practice. My point could perhaps be stated more

662:

Some articles have sections "advantages", "disadvantages", "benefits and drawbacks", "potential concerns". Relatedly, some articles have sections "complications", "cautions and warnings", "side effects and complications", "contraindications", "cautions and contraindications", "side effects", "health

199:

I've never been involved in the FA process for any article, so I'm a little unsure about the whole thing. That said, it had a peer review a while back, and I formatted what I got out of the peer review into a to-do list. Two of the reviewer's concerns (one of the ancient history claims was dubious,

1275:

Stubbiness or not is only determined by whether people are interested in working on the article. Notability determines only whether an article is allowed to be created, and has no effect on length. Being the subject of two articles in major newspapers would probably meet the notability criteria (I

415:

I'm glad all the code is in place. It'll likely take at least a week for me to finish this. (Y'all feel free to help out...) But the other side is this: We're here to write an encyclopedia. Don't let a relatively unimportant administrative task distract you from writing and improving the actual

3745:

9 See also The Center for Reproductive Rights, Human sexuality, Planned Parenthood, Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition, Roe v. Wade, Reproductive rights 10 References - I don't want to spam up this page by listing them all here but I do have a lot of them. 11 External links - Again, I have

3738:

Based on what I have seen, I was thinking of something like this: Contents 1 History – A short overview of El Salvador and significant events that changed reproductive laws, rights, and policies 2 Human rights – El Salvador’s stance on world policies and a look at their own laws – like their stance

3282:

One user continually reverts any edits to the article made by others, to either of these two questions. This same user appears to be intrigued by human sexuality generally, and his behavior is similar at several such articles. Your participation in this discussion will be welcomed. If authoritative

3133:

as to what the correct title for the article should be. As per the first post of that Talk section, there is currently a discrepancy between the article title and its contents. The general consensus of the discussion appears to be that the scope should include surgical and non-surgical methods, and

1743:

The WPMED template was recently changed so that taskforce importance was longer inherited from WPMED importance. (i.e. formerly, if taskforce-imp is not specified, then the taskforce importance would be the same as the general WPMED importance. After the change, the taskforce importance is "None"

1311:

article makes some claims to subsuming some of the other areas of reproductive medicine, but that seems peculiar, since reproductive medicine deals with both sexes, whereas strictly OB/Gyn is just for women (I would have classed OB/Gyn as a subset of Reproductive medicine, rather than the other way

986:

is something that I would tag as WPMED because we're the closest related WikiProject. If a WikiProject Human Physiology existed, then I might choose that in preference -- but no such thing exists, and the 1.0 team would ultimately like every article to "belong" somewhere. If the RepMed task force

948:

Sorry my post wasn't clearer, the reason I could say why some of those were tagged as reproductive taskforce was because I tagged them. That is also part of why I asked about those articles in particular. (Obviously I think they made sense as WPMED & reproductive, but since scope question was

282:

had commented that there were ~1800 unassessed articles she was working on with Outriggr's script. Because task forces break that script, we should not set up a system to tag articles belonging to our task force until that backlog has been cleared (at which point doing assessments by hand will not

3309:

for his attitude at the fertility article. My complaint includes both his edits and his attitude against me, such as his personal attacks against me- accusing me of activism and bias, refusing to discuss the changes on his talk page. Here is a study that I'm trying to add, which I think is useful.

2430:

it said that they may be inert, or contain copper, or contain hormones.) The ATC code used was the general one for all IUDs. Although the example pictured was a copper IUD, the caption indicated that it was one type of IUD. The effective period was given as a range, it did not say that all such

1503:

It can be done for task forces (we just need to supply the task force category as an argument to the subscription template). I think that placing the following incantation on the taskforce page would do the job. {{User:WolterBot/Cleanup listing subscription|wgcat=Reproductive medicine task force

1016:

just like hCG is (I'll go add it now); I don't think its inclusion in WPMED is required for it to belong somewhere. I would lean toward not including these types of articles, but don't feel strongly about it. WhatamIdoing doesn't seem to feel strongly either way, and Zodon seems to find value in

671:

Some articles have a "prevalence", "popularity", or "worldwide use" section. I would like to standardize this name to "prevalence". Placement - after the sections discussed above? And, lastly, "mechanisms" (as discussed above), followed by "society and culture" (not sure of the exact name), and

3723:

Hello all, I am required to contribute to Wiki for my class Gender and Economics in the Third World and have been designated to work on El Salvador. I am working on an article to be called Reproductive rights in El Salvador. I am looking at covering topics including things like history, abortion,

2721:

Noticed SVG versions of the picture are available in some other languages, I picked the portugese and it seems I can edit it with Inkscape... although editing images like that really is nothing that I am good at. But maybe this is a way to reuse most of the image while fixing some details. SVG is

2699:

regarding points (1) and (2), it may be mostly a problem with scaling the values. The rise and fall is there and the whole variation is barely visible. Not quite sure what you mean with (3)... yes ovulation should not be a wide rectangle but rather a line. I have seen a few such images, most look

1758:

As a result of my inquiry about this, the old behavior has been restored for the reproductive medicine taskforce. Since very few articles in this taskforce have a taskforce-imp specified, that seemed reasonable. (Note that the assessment statistics templates have not yet been updated by the bot

1232:

No. It's not independent (it's a press release, not an article a journalist unrelated to the organization decided to write), and there's just one of it (so fails the "multiple" requirement). It's hard for new organizations to get into Knowledge. As their organization acquires a few more years

808:

The initial proposal made it sound like it would cover reproduction related material out of other projects, like Sexology and sexuality and pharmacology. Many of the birth control methods might be more properly categorized as pharmacology. Likewise, material about sexual practices relating to

2482:

I've already been substantially involved in authoring articles related to reproductive medicine, and now I'd like to go a bit more official and also tend to articles that not only I but also the community puts priority to. However, my interest is at least as much into infertility (and assisted

2664:

and its versions are extensively used in reproductive medicine related articles in numerous Wikipedias (I've temporarily removed it from the articles in the English Knowledge). These are great images, but I think they incorrectly present the changing of levels of FSH and LH (and perhaps other

3371:

While it is in a reputable journal, the study appears to be a primary source for the information you are concerned with (i.e. it is not a review article). As such, interpretation is difficult, a reliable secondary source would be better. I will post more specifics on the article talk page.

697:

These aren't exactly identical terms, so I think we want to use appropriate judgement in each article. However, I think that "Types" is probably a generally applicable term and could be used in all articles about devices and most articles about medications, and at least some articles about

2112:

Just a thought on cost - low startup cost and low method cost per use are advantages of the method, however much of the cost comes from method failures. While inexpensive for short term use, when used for a few years, IUD etc. become more cost effective. (Trussell - Cost effectiveness of

2531:

and I have released the content under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License. I think that it is important to add important safety information to ensure that the reader receives a balanced view of Cervarix. All of the

160:

I think this task force will include all aspects of reproduction, including gynecology, fertility, contraception, conception, embryology, obstetrics, parturition, and any topics between I may have missed. The initial focus on birth control is because that is the primary interest of

110:

Sorry if I sound very ignorant asking this, but the exact topic of parturition/childbirth is included under pregnancy or fertility, or is it being seen as beyond the scope of current task force? Or is it that I can take the liberty of adding this topic to the already existing list?

2010:

Technically, as I understand the standards, #Types#Combined should have a ref in it, but other than that, it meets the B-class standards. Given the relative unimportance of this missing ref (and the likelihood that you can trivially produce several), I've upgraded it to B class.

2591:

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as

3996:

Hello, I am Dr Renee Edwards, a urogynecologist at Oregon Health & Science University. Today we had an edit-a-thon on women's health topics and chose to work on the uterine prolapse page. Thank you. I hope to continue working on pages related to pelvic organ prolapse

667:

has "contraindications"/"adverse events" right after "available forms". I would like to have this a little lower, after the "use"/"fitting"/"procedure" section as I explained in the previous paragraph. And then maybe the advantages/disadvantages sections after that?

3205: 1584:

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. —

1481:

Reports are generated every time there's a database dump, which last happened in October 2008 and which is next scheduled to happen sometime after the database dumping program is entirely replaced, because en.wikipedia.org is too large for the existing software to

317:'s effort to assess unassessed articles. If this is the case, it would be easily remedied by assessing articles when adding task force tags. Additionally, all of the scripts the perform article tagging are going to need to be modified soon due to the addition of 2047:

It might be nice to have a section about "availability". Are they banned in some countries? In the UK, they are available free from family planning clinics (though I don't know what % of usage that accounts for). To what extent is cost a factor in their usage?

496:

It's new to me, at least, for others it may be old hat. But, I thought it might be useful when we get around to prioritizing articles. Of the birth control articles, condom is by far the most viewed at around 5000 hits per day. I think the next highest is the

2231: 359: 2437:

Suggested way forward - move IUD with copper back to Intrauterine device. Since much of the content of the article currently at IUD with copper is about IUDs in general, the content will have to be moved anyway. Moving the whole article would make the history

3078:, pointing out an unmet need for family planning. I believe a thorough, unbiased presentation of family planning in Muslim populations will expand upon challenges to this goal and bring light to the development of women and human rights in these communities. 3867: 366:" is the importance of the article to the task force - so an article can have one importance for the Medicine project and another importance for the task force. If this is left out, the importance will default to the project's importance parameter (" 2441:

Is a separate article about IUD with copper needed at this time? Since there is already an article on one such device, I am not sure that we have enough that relates to that type of device to make a new article necessary/desirable at this point.

1048:

has contacted me and wishes the article reinstated if possible. Being helpful, I'm looking at ways forward that don't scare such contributors off, without obviously breaching our policies. It was pointed out to me that we have articles such as:

1303:. While that article is certainly part of reproductive medicine, it does not seem to give a good overview of the field. At the moment I can't think of an article that seems exactly right to be/evolve into an overview of reproductive medicine. 3321:

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of aging on the percentage of outwardly healthy couples who are sterile (completely unable to conceive without assisted reproduction) or infertile (unable to conceive within a year of unprotected intercourse).

2182:

all mention of immunotoxicity, the entire "Diagnosis" section, and was a 3RR violation from a likely banned user as well. I hope you will please look in particular at the second paragraph in the Epidemiology section removed prior to the table.

2574:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at 1247:

That's fair enough. They've indicated they have had contact from The Oregonian in Portland and the Chicago Tribune, so I've told them to let me know what happens with them. They'd be reliable enough for a stub at the least, wouldn't they?

809:

reproductive health, abortion, etc. is possibly more strictly sociology. There is also the matter of how to handle legal aspects related to reproductive medicine (reproductive rights, laws governing practice of reproductive medicine, etc.).

812:

I don't think the taskforce should be too strict about only medicine articles, but don't feel strongly about it. If folks want it more strictly medical, I won't object. But if so, maybe we can come up with a little more guidance to aid

3657:

article, so I have been working on revising that. I have added more information to the page and tried to improve the organization. If you would like to look at it, I would appreciate any feedback you have on how to improve that article

1233:

under its belt, it will almost certainly start accumulating the kind of press attention that editors here want to see before accepting an article on the organization. But for now, it does not appear that Knowledge is the place for them.

1759:

since the change.) Wanted to let folks know about the change in case there were other opinions about which way this taskforce should handle importance rating. (i.e. if think should change handling, we can discuss it here.) Thanks.

3134:

thus we should rename the article (and tidy up the contents). However the participants don't agree on what the title should be, and would like someone from WikiProject Medicine to provide an opinion. The most recent suggestions are:

287: 3328:

RESULTS: Sterility was estimated at about 1%; this percent did not change with age. The percentage infertility was estimated at 8% for women aged 19-26 years, 13-14% for women aged 27-34 years and 18% for women aged 35-39 years.

2135:

I suppose it also depends on the number of uses. Most of these things are standardized for "average married couples" (three potential pregnancy risks per week), and human behavior is known to be highly variable on this point.

2811: 2116:

Also if there was anything general enough to be said apropos cost effectiveness as STD preventive adjunct to other contraceptives (e.g. LARC). (Source is again Trussell - the followup to the 1995 cost effectiveness article.)

789:

I think we could define ourselves more narrowly than WPMED as a whole, but probably shouldn't be more expansive. Right now, WPMED is accepting physiology articles largely because there's no better project in existence.

3539:

section. I don't see any study directly studying the correlation between oral sex and miscarriage, but at the same time I don't find the section to present it as an unequivocal fact, so I think it's acceptable as it is.

3512:? That article has a whole section titled "Miscarriage reduction" which states as fact that oral sex (fellatio) reduces the risk of miscarriage. This is presented as an unequivocal fact, but I'm not aware of being any 313:? In any case, if Outriggr's script does break, it would only be on articles that were already given task force parameters. So, if the task force parameters were only added to assessed articles, it shouldn't effect 3333:

CONCLUSION: Increased infertility in older couples is attributable primarily to declines in fertility rates rather than to absolute sterility. Many infertile couples will conceive if they try for an additional year.

21: 651:

has it listed eighth), and for user-independent methods (where typical effectiveness is over 99%) the effectiveness section could probably go next to mechanisms. I'd like to hear other opinions on this, though.

82:

page? It seems to say that Oligo- and Oligozoo-spermai are two distinct conditions, while my Stedman's lists them as synonymous. I would do this myself but, I have neither the time or the expertise at present.

852:

clearly like this: Whatever is tagged as belonging to this taskforce will automatically and unavoidably be tagged by WPMED, so we should not include things that would clearly be rejected by WPMED as a whole.

3062:

communities in order to explain family planning practice differences according to geographic location, differences between the Shia and Sunni denominations, and current legislation in various Islamic states.

773:

is an article about a protein. Would "early pregnancy factor" be excluded from this task force? Or, do members want to include both strictly medical as well as related background articles in this task force?

3763:

It sound like an important article. I think the content description seems fine. I list some similar articles below for other countries, since they may help you with inspiration for how to design the new one:

1834:

is incomplete and vastly under-referenced. It also seems kind of important, relative to not just this task force, but to the whole encyclopedia. Does anyone here know much about it and want to improve it?

452:

Yes, that should be just fine. I'd appreciate it if you also double-checked the main project's ratings as you went. Something that was assessed even a few weeks ago could be shockingly out of date by now.

165:, the person who proposed this task force. You could consider birth control as the current collaboration effort of the task force, but that shouldn't preclude other topics from being added and worked on. -- 3935:

years ago. It might be interesting to turn it into a proper article. In the meantime, if anyone has a good list of medical conditions that are treated by obstetricians or gynecologists, then please either

1994:

article, and it's no longer start-class. I'm requesting that outside editor reassess it. I'm thinking it's B-class now; if it's deemed C-class I would appreciate some tips on what it would need to make B.

4101:

Establishment of detailed reference values for luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during different phases of the menstrual cycle on the Abbott ARCHITECT analyzer.

1083:, and am waiting for the user to reply, but would be interested in hearing more expert knowledge on whether there is any bias in the articles listed or whether they may also be speedy deletion candidates? 411:

The script has already been modified to include the C-class. We may need to adjust our guidelines for it, and of course everything that is now classed as "Start" needs to be reviewed. (But that's all for

2754:

No, actual scales for individual substances can now be seen in image just below. I don't think it matters if they are not uniform there, as long as there is a link to a diagram with actual levels given.

2113:

contraceptives in US.) Although the specifics of costs vary by location, the general pattern (most of cost in method failures, various forms of LARC more cost effective in longer term) probably applies.

385: 2532:

pharmaceutical product articles that I have read on Knowledge with ratings of “B and GA” (e.g. Atorvastatin and Warfarin) in the WikiProject Medicine Quality scale include safety related information.

1466:? (Looks like we can get a report generated by just including a template on the project page. Unfortunately the reports are only generated every few months, and at the moment it is 3-4 months old). 467:

Actually, having thought about it longer, I have no idea whether it will be a problem. But try it, and I'll squawk if it becomes a problem. We can always temporarily revert the code if necessary.

1693:, which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the 624:

for "available forms". I'm unsure of how to standardize the section name, though: should they all be the same (varieties?), or should hormonal methods stay with "formulations"?. Others' thoughts?

3058:

There exists an increasing body of research on this topic in various Muslim communities as well as increasing legislation on the topic in most Islamic states. I propose to give examples of varying

761:

would be a medical topic, though (as such disorders are often treated by health providers). Would "menstrual cycle" be excluded from this task force but "menstrual disorder" included? Similarly,

1971:. I would appreciate any feedback on formatting, article inclusion, and whether it would be useful on the pages of included articles, specifically the condom article and the brand name articles. 2672:

Follicular phase. At the beginning of the phase it raises and then starts to fall under the negative-feedback effect of estrogen (and inhibin) so that only the dominant follicle develops further.

655:

Some articles have "fitting" or "use" sections (COCP, IUS, condom); if both (diaphragm and cervical cap), they are found next to each other. This would probably be equivalent to "procedure" in

2378:. However, there is very little support for that approach to the terminology (it is at best a regionalism), and it was causing great confusion for our readers and editors (see the talk page at 2955:...). In addition to what was previously supported (bibcode, doi, jstor, isbn, ...), templates now support arXiv, ASIN, JFM, LCCN, MR, OL, OSTI, RFC, SSRN and Zbl. Before, you needed to place 2840: 3805: 2825:

There, the diagram is finished. So now, as I see it, it's simply to take the "average"-lines to replace the ones in the image above. But first, does anyone have any comments on the diagram?

1578: 3816: 663:

issues", and "safety"; COCP and IUD have serious effects listed under one name, and less serious effects listed under another name. I'm not sure how to standardize the names. For order,

2873:. This task force, however, seems to be the most closely related one, and, IMPOV, enough so make a separate ob/gyn task force unjustified, and subsequently make it justified to redirect 3442: 3431: 3238:

Is the penis depicted in the left photograph at the top of the page correctly labeled as "flaccid", or is it partly engorged, and more properly labeled as "semi-flaccid"; and also are

722:

Just a suggestion (with each section optional): Terminology; History; Classification; Physiology; Complications and contraindications; Additional images; References; External links. --

2556: 2383: 1375:

article; "reproductive medicine" is the medical field, "reproductive health" is the goal, and "reproductive endocrinology and infertility" the specialty training for physicians.

1068: 355: 2283: 1805:

was added to the top of the project page. Since several of the other taskforces use the same graphic as is used in WPMED, I changed the graphic to the sperm and egg micrograph

1316:. Since I don't have a good answer, I thought the task force seemed like a reasonable place to get some input. Thoughts? Suggestions of where it should be directed? Thanks. 1013: 1331:"Reproductive health" seems like the best candidate for now. As that article grows, hopefully a "reproductive medicine" article can be spun out from it at some future point. 3486: 3365:

This is not an appropriate place to discuss user behavior. Questions about that would be better directed to editorial assistance, or the user noticeboards. Please remember

200:

and there was no coverage of how the pill and AIDS impacted condom use) were addressed by my recent expansion of the history section; the remaining items are still listed at

2627:

that they selected had some issues (some vandalism, some unsourced and unencyclopedic material, and a few glaring factual errors). I have fixed the big problems that I saw

1914:

I was actually hoping (many months ago) to get condom to FA status. But then I got sick and couldn't work on it... yeah, it would be nice to see condom be designated a GA.

1079:

Some of which may be of equal worth as the organization which was the subject of the article I deleted. I have asked for any sources so that an article could be written on

1409:. I haven't linked it to any of the articles yet, thought I would publicize it here to get feedback and give a chance to polish it up a bit before it goes live. Thanks. 1463: 822: 351: 347: 226:

Well, I've never dealt with FA status before, either, but presumably there are some guidelines around somewhere. We'll find them and see if we can make any sense of them.

2198:

It seems to me that you might be conflating "Gulf War syndrome" with "Any and all health problems affecting people deployed to the Gulf War." They are not synonymous.

581:. There are a few articles that have "terminology" section at the top, where there is concern readers may need that information to understand the rest of the article ( 2456:

If you want to rearrange the content, I have no objection, as long as the title+introduction of each resulting article makes the subject of the article unambiguous. --

2331:. I think both these changes should be reverted, but would appreciate input from other taskforce members. Please comment on the talk pages of the related articles. 2483:

reproductive technology) as in birth control, but this task force seems to focus on the latter. May this still be the task force for me, or am I in the wrong place?

1607: 4032:

As part of an edit-a-thon today, I edited the entry on Pap tests. I just wanted to say hello to those who work in this page; look forward to hearing back from you.

3844: 2235: 2219: 1276:

can't say for sure as I'm not active in that part of Knowledge); being mentioned in the articles but not a subject of them would be a more difficult case to argue.

1438:

I don't have the knowledge to give a thorough review, but it looks like it will be quite useful in linking the listed articles. I look forward to seeing it live.

1686: 1459: 825:

was categorized because it allowed doctors in the U.S. freedom to offer contraceptives, and may be a significant step in the history of contraception in the U.S..

3010:

Obviously not all citations needs all parameters, but this streamlines the most popular ones and gives both better metadata and better appearances when printed.

290:, which only lists a handful of unassessed articles. I don't think that was what WhatamIdoing was referring to. Could someone point me in the right direction? 1129:

for you, such as a couple of newspaper articles or the like? If such sources exist, they'll have them. If such sources don't exist, then they do not meet the

747: 405: 310: 3103: 2382:

for context.) This approach was not only wrong, but dangerous, in that the infobox implied that a IUD with progestogen could be left in for "12+" years. Per

2079:

and perhaps for that reason (possibly others) they are often security tagged in supermarkets. This aspect is noted in the well known (in the UK) Madness song

1701:

to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Knowledge:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at

204:. I also think the article would read better if the (now very long) history section were spun out into its own article, leaving just a summary-style within 3201: 2394:. (As mentioned in the edit summary at the time of the split, a case could be made for including the word "plastic".) "Intrauterine system" was renamed to 1505: 3448:

Perhaps this WikiProject and its members may be interested in contributing to this discussion, and/or a quality improvement project for this list page. —

2527:

propose that a new section be added to the Cervarix article that includes the important safety information for Cervarix. I have added my proposal to the

1812:

Don't see putting in a lot of graphics on the project page (just slows load times, etc.), but if going to use anatomy diagrams, should cover both sexes.

2039:'s GA status was pending, and have a few suggestions for what it might take to reach FA. These are all "suggestions", not "requirements", primarily from 1866:

due to 21 alphaOHase deficiency there was a salt wasting dehydration that led to prerenal azotemia. Would this result not result in excess natriuresis?

1300: 1895:

status. I think it's likely to sail through the process (assuming the reviewer is looking at a non-vandalized copy), and there's no good reason for it

4088: 4056: 4041: 4021: 4006: 3985: 3962: 3918: 3894: 3879: 3856: 3832: 3757: 3733: 3713: 3689: 3667: 3646: 3601: 3581: 3569: 3549: 3529: 3498: 3474: 3459: 3415: 3381: 3359: 3311: 3292: 3217: 3189: 3168: 3115: 3091: 3033: 2909: 2890: 2852: 2834: 2788: 2764: 2749: 2731: 2714: 2693: 2639: 2611: 2541: 2507: 2492: 2465: 2451: 2415: 2348: 2305: 2250: 2207: 2192: 2145: 2126: 2106: 2020: 2004: 1980: 1957: 1923: 1908: 1875: 1844: 1821: 1791: 1768: 1745: 1630: 1567: 1539: 1517: 1494: 1475: 1447: 1433: 1418: 1384: 1358: 1340: 1325: 1285: 1257: 1242: 1225: 1204: 1190: 1164: 1142: 1116: 1095: 1063: 1026: 996: 958: 927: 861: 799: 783: 731: 711: 684: 566: 551: 518: 476: 462: 447: 425: 396: 389: 299: 264: 238: 217: 193: 169: 154: 98: 3465:

I made a comment there. To remain in Wikiedia, I think the list requires more extensive work than I believe can be achieved in a foreseeable future.

3795: 2722:

kind of xml so it might be possible to find or write a script to actually extract/replace the faulty values instead of doing some mouse acrobatics.

4103:

Reto Stricker, Raphael Eberhart, Marie-Christine Chevailler, Frank A. Quinn, Paul Bischof and Rene´ Stricker. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44(7):883–887

2798: 3156: 3130: 2434:

What confusion are you referring to on the talk page? (I didn't see much confusion on that in skimming the talk page. Any particular headings?)

1938:

for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed

2295: 2617:

Thought it might make sense to use this as a place to comment on the status of these articles before giving feedback to the Version 8 folks.

675:

That's a lot to discuss all at once, but I'm not sure the topic lends itself to discussion of smaller bits (though am open to suggestions).

3767: 3536: 3407: 3351: 2552: 914:. It's a protein used in pregnancy tests, like "early pregnancy factor". Should the hCG article be tagged as part of WPMED? Or does the 3204:

article to Featured Article status. If you are familiar with the Featured Article criteria, you are welcome to contribute a FA review at

2234:

will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the

3521: 2665:

hormones) during the menstrual cycle (as described for example in Gynecology by Ten Teacher, 18th ed., 2006, by Campbell and Monga, cf.

1619: 1213: 819:

Early pregnancy factor was categorized because it was listed on beginning of pregnancy controversy as a possible test for fertilization.

252: 51: 17: 2682:

I've contacted the uploader, but due to being busy in real life, he is unable to correct the image. Perhaps someone else would want to.

3906: 3772: 3123: 2537: 1690: 1682: 577:

Many of the birth control articles have a "history" section, and the consensus seems to be to put this at the top. This also follows

2839:

Also, I think it would be a good idea to have the main source data from Stricker 2006 easily available. I've got it in an Excel-file

2184: 1953: 3629:). If a section on a particular country becomes long enough (such as the section on family planning in China) then we can discuss 4052: 4017: 3981: 3914: 3890: 3828: 3685: 3642: 3577: 3545: 3494: 3470: 3185: 3111: 2905: 2886: 2848: 2830: 2784: 2760: 2503: 2488: 1017:

including them. So to me, it looks like the consensus it towards including these kinds of articles. Thanks for providing input.

628: 617: 498: 3811: 1655: 229:

I see what you mean about the history section tending to dominate the article right now. A sub-article might be appropriate.

3047:. The Knowledge page indicates a need for a greater world view of the topic because though it mentions China, Hong Kong, and 4076: 4064: 3020: 1863: 1727: 1659: 1073: 1053: 3742:

8.1 Family rights, laws, and polices 8.2 Abortion rights, laws, and policies 8.3 Religious beliefs and issues

2843:, but it's not a permitted format for uploading. Could anyone convert it to an uploadable format (preferably a wiki-table)? 3611: 1857:"2.low urine sodium < 10 ( because kidney saves sodium and water,hence low urine sodium and increase urine osmolarity)" 1102: 1080: 1037: 3366: 2533: 1702: 3071: 2897: 2874: 2498:

Never mind. I'm joining anyway. I could join an infertility & ART task force as well if such a group emerges later.

1403: 911: 620:) are further down the page. I'm leaning toward preferring the higher position, right after history; this would follow 3572:. Personally, I think it deserves a B now, but I may have a conflict of interest by having edited it so much recently. 1802: 3973: 3800: 3253: 1181:

When and if they do, then we can revisit this issue. Until then, the article appears to have been properly deleted.

4048: 4013: 3977: 3910: 3886: 3824: 3681: 3638: 3573: 3541: 3490: 3466: 3181: 3157:

Talk:Sterilization (surgical procedure)#What should the scope of this article be? Should it be limited to "surgical"?

3131:

Talk:Sterilization (surgical procedure)#What should the scope of this article be? Should it be limited to "surgical"?

3107: 2901: 2882: 2844: 2826: 2780: 2756: 2686: 2499: 2484: 1485:

I think it's a great idea, but I'm not sure whether it can be done for task forces. Do you want to ask the author?

3680:

Otherwise, from the quick look I had today I have nothing to add in addition to the peer reviews already presented.

286:

I poked around a little to see if I could track the progress of this backlog. The only thing I was able to find is

3516:

in this regard or anything close to it (the evidence seems quite sparse). Also this is not mentioned at all in the

2870: 2689:) got deleted as it was not created in an open format. Also, sources and data used should be explicitely stated. -- 2601: 2585: 2576: 2000: 1976: 1919: 1443: 1336: 1308: 1281: 1238: 1111: 1022: 923: 779: 699: 680: 514: 295: 213: 42: 3607:

I think it's a very needed topic, and I'm grateful for your interest in the subject. I see two alternatives here:

1654:

subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering

3630: 3067: 2387: 2332: 2260: 1399:

I have been thinking about a navigation template for articles on reproductive health. So I created the template

766: 636: 609: 438:

So is it indeed alright to tag items with the reproductive=yes tag as long as they already have an importance?

3785: 3411: 3355: 1671: 1667: 1645: 1636: 1558:

that may be of interest. The issue is whether the article on abortion should describe or show what is aborted.

816:

A few examples that it might help to get some feedback on (i.e. should they be reproductive taskforce, or not).

608:

articles have a "types" section in the same position. However, similar sections in other articles ("types" in

3438: 3426: 3313:. I'm also trying to add an interview with the author of the study (a quote from the interview) which is here: 949:

raised they seemed like other things that there might be question on, so wanted to see what others thought.)

3852: 3790: 3654: 3525: 3288: 3048: 2700:

very similar like this regarding FSH/LH and personally I think there is wide variation in FSH and LH levels.

2661: 2646: 644: 3489:. If you feel that your issue has not been appropriately dealt with, then feel free to post it again here. 4037: 3958: 3663: 3597: 3314: 3087: 2922: 2916: 2745: 2705:

Too bad the original file has been deleted, is it lost forever or could it be converted to a free format?

2203: 2141: 2102: 2016: 1991: 1904: 1892: 1840: 1787: 1563: 1490: 1429: 1186: 1138: 992: 983: 857: 795: 770: 707: 582: 472: 458: 421: 260: 234: 189: 3870:, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. 3348:

attitude acceptable? ie- his edit summaries? His refusal to discuss? His removal of sourced information?

3098:

I'm sure such a section would be highly appreciated by readers. I've found one book which may be useful,

2939: 2188: 1949: 1663: 1372: 1296: 1106: 632: 2666: 2230:

will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's

3164: 2593: 2395: 2379: 2336: 2328: 1871: 1779: 1626: 1559: 1214:

http://www.eprhealthcarenews.com/2008/08/12/information-about-all-facets-of-the-egg-donation-process/

837: 141:

Kindly clarify. I didn't expand the above list as I wasn't sure if doing so would require consensus.

94: 88: 4084: 3625:

Write about each country in the "Family planning article" under the section "Regional variations" (

3213: 3075: 2803: 2427: 2403: 2367: 2363: 2324: 2316: 1752: 1304: 640: 613: 605: 586: 542:". Please direct any comments about the change to the talk page for the WPMED template. Thanks. 506: 2563:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the 2063: 4002: 3875: 3848: 3753: 3729: 3619: 3513: 3403: 3399: 3284: 3016: 2461: 2411: 1806: 1058: 758: 727: 502: 120: 2083:. Being seen carrying a condom might lead to judgement about one's promiscuity or expectations. 2810:. References and further description of values are given in image page in Wikimedia Commons at 627:

Many articles have "effectiveness" and "mechanism of action" sections next to each other (e.g.

4104: 4033: 3954: 3659: 3593: 3535:

The practice seems to have an established association with pre-eclampsia, as described in the

3083: 2949: 2929: 2741: 2727: 2710: 2608: 2588:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th. 2199: 2154: 2137: 2098: 2012: 1900: 1836: 1783: 1598: 1486: 1425: 1313: 1182: 1134: 988: 853: 791: 703: 468: 454: 417: 371: 314: 306: 279: 256: 230: 201: 185: 4047:

Thanks! Any improvement to women's health articles are appreciated, so you are welcome back.

3779: 3148: 3028: 2675:

The level of FSH and LH are definitely not the same in the beginning of the menstrual cycle.

2272: 1945: 1714: 1253: 1221: 1200: 1160: 1091: 833: 757:

is important to reproduction, but its more of a physiology article than a medical article.

664: 648: 621: 578: 321: 2284:

Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force/Archive 1/Unreferenced BLPs

180:

Lyrl (or anyone else), Can you give us a quick idea of what you think it might take to get

3615: 3377: 3160: 3044: 2807: 2635: 2620: 2447: 2399: 2344: 2320: 2227: 2122: 1968: 1867: 1817: 1764: 1622: 1554:

Not that I'm expecting a big stampede of support or anything, but there's an RFC going on

1535: 1513: 1471: 1414: 1354: 1321: 1045: 954: 829: 754: 562: 547: 509:

at a little under 1000 per day (it surprised me that withdrawal ranked so high up there).

443: 393: 166: 144: 84: 1782:? What do you think it would take to get this to GA status? What content needs added? 360:

Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Reproductive medicine articles by quality statistics

332:

And if you haven't noticed yet, the technical side is all ready for tagging. By adding "

4111: 2812:

Commons:File:Sex hormones estradiol, progesterone, LH and FSH during menstrual cycle.svg

528:

In case anyone else is interested, we are talking about changing the task force tags in

501:

article at a little over 1000 (I'm surprised it's that far behind condom!), followed by

4080: 3709: 3455: 3209: 3024: 2982: 2960: 2630:. Doing some further polishing so figure would wait to submit to the Version 8 list. 2584:

and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at

2074: 2049: 1732: 1651: 1380: 915: 762: 656: 532: 378: 340: 2273:

There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles

3998: 3940: 3871: 3749: 3725: 3395: 3389: 3231: 3012: 2690: 2457: 2407: 2359: 2268: 2245: 2090: 1831: 1722: 1713:

to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome

1424:

I think it's in good shape. I didn't see any major articles missing from the list.

1130: 723: 135: 115: 3868:

Category:Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force articles needing expert attention

2877:

to here. Just in case, however, can anyone think of any ob/gyn articles that should

2519: 1458:

Would it be worth while getting a cleanup listing for the task force (like this one

702:, it also has the advantage of being perfectly intelligible to the general reader. 4012:

Thank you! I hope you'll find continued interest in editing women's health topics.

3345: 3306: 3298: 3155:

Can we have some opinions on these, or other article titles please - preferably at

2723: 2706: 2391: 2089:

Some of the "other uses" might need to be culled as being insufficiently important/

2080: 1940: 1588: 1126: 601: 590: 79: 3702:

Archived one thread that dealt with a since-closed deletion discussion. Cheers, —

2581: 2170:

the disputed edit was reverted by an administrator after sockpuppet investigations

1349:

I have changed "Reproductive medicine" to point to Reproductive health. Thanks.

255:. Presumably the history spin off and the /to do list needs dealing with first. 3274:

appropriate phrasing for a serious article in Knowledge, or are these merely two

3242:

of these two images redundant, given the series of photographs lower on the page?

918:

article sufficiently cover the relevant medical information on hCG, but not EPF?

3969: 3845:

Talk:HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry#Propose broaden scope and rename

3517: 3141:- suggested by Skyeking, for reasons described described by him on the Talk page 2067: 1710: 1249: 1217: 1196: 1156: 1087: 50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3901:

Move: Vaginal birth after caesarean → Delivery after previous Caesarean section

3052: 2547:

Reproductive medicine articles have been selected for the Knowledge 0.8 release

2077: 408:

is indeed what I'm targeting. You'll notice that it's been shrinking recently.

4100: 3949: 3373: 2631: 2443: 2340: 2118: 2040: 1813: 1760: 1531: 1509: 1467: 1410: 1350: 1317: 950: 893:). They were not already tagged, which was why I had started this discussion. 558: 543: 439: 3301:

at the fertility article- changing of content and personal attacks against me

3932: 3704: 3565: 3557: 3450: 2653: 2564: 2302: 1996: 1972: 1915: 1751:

The old behavior can be restored for those taskforces that desire it. (See

1439: 1376: 1332: 1312:

around.). While Reproductive medicine is not heavily visited, it is used in

1277: 1234: 1018: 919: 775: 676: 510: 327:. Maybe the task force bug will be fixed in the next release of the script. 291: 288:

Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Medicine articles by quality statistics

209: 162: 130: 125: 4107: 3508:

Could somebody with very good knowledge of the subject look at the article

2426:

Where did the page say that IUD means IUD with copper? (In the section on

2398:, and "Intrauterine device" was split, with the copper-specific content at 2370:. The articles at that time (prior to March 11th) asserted that the use of 3176: 3002:

The full list of supported identifiers is given here (with dummy values):

3653:

Thank you so much for your feedback. I realized that there is already a

3509: 3224: 2991: 2355: 2241: 2073:

Social stigma: Associated with promiscuity/non-monogamous relationships.

2514:

Propose new section in Cervarix Article for Important Safety Information

2384:

Knowledge:Manual_of_Style_(medicine-related_articles)#Naming_conventions

2218:

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the

2740:

Are the scales even meant to be uniform? I'm not sure that they are.

2060: 2178:

which removed several peer reviewed secondary sources, a dispute tag,

3839:

Proposal to broaden/rename HIV/AIDS in the pornographic film industry

3059: 3043:

I am proposing expanding upon and possibly editing the page entitled

2555:

for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were

2056: 2036: 2028: 1888: 1881: 1195:

I haven't heard anything more as yet, so I'll put this one to rest.

1101:

The other organizations all seem to be notable, and I'm not sure the

753:

How "medical" should articles be to be included in this task force?

597: 205: 181: 2683: 2678:

The surge of FSH and LH start already in the late follicular phase.

3275: 2652: 2600:

to extend the reach of Knowledge worldwide. Please help us, with

2551:

Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge articles selected by the

2523: 2278:

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at

639:), or a combined "effectiveness and mechanism of action" section ( 490:

I just found a tool for determining the page views of an article:

2969: 4077:

Talk:Abortion-rights movements#RFC: parity for abortion activism

4065:

Talk:Abortion-rights movements#RFC: parity for abortion activism

3746:

plenty but don't want to spam this up by listing them all here.

3400:

Talk:Birth control#Reviews on the topic in the Lancet this month

2779:

I'll try to make a diagram from Stricker 2006 instead. Hang on.

2597: 1620:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine#Nadya Suleman aka "Octo-mom"

878:

Zodon recently tagged all of those articles with the WPMED tag (

2528: 1555: 386:

Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force

3283:

information can be provided, the RfC can hopefully be closed.

2580:

with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's

1935: 1041: 29: 3147:- suggested by Mitch Ames, because it appears to comply with 3055:, comprises approximately 21-23% of the world’s population. 2572:

Reproductive medicine articles and revisionIDs we have chosen

1801:

Recently a cross-section diagram of the male genital anatomy

538:

to being all lowercase, with dashes to separate words e.g., "

3719:

New contributor looking for advice on creating a new article

2059:?): Who pays for the condom, economic pressures for non-use 1606:

on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at

3568:

article, and I would a appreciate a re-assessment of it by

2896:

Since no disagreeing entry has appeared, I'll now redirect

491: 3806:

Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012

2900:

to here, and consider this the task force for this scope.

2315:

Recently the article on IUDs was split into two sections (

3817:

Teenage pregnancy and sexual health in the United Kingdom

2354:

Before March 11th, there were two articles (not counting

2275:, so it is important that these articles are referenced. 3443:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of books about AIDS

3432:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of books about AIDS

2557:

selected based on their assessed importance and quality

1858: 692:

Varieties vs. Formulations vs. Types vs. Available forms

3928: 3626: 3252:"Erections during sleep or when waking up are known as 3200:

This project has an opportunity to promote its article

2628: 2624: 2375: 2371: 2175: 1212:. I have been asked if this source is reliable enough: 891: 888: 885: 882: 879: 275:

Article tagging / waiting on unassessed article backlog

3341:

Is this study acceptable? How should it be presented?

1125:

Has PVEDO provided a list of independent, third-party

3847:, that members of this project may be interested in. 3633:

the contents of that country into a separate article.

3159:

so that all discussion appears in one place. Thanks.

1850:

Confirm low urine Na+ in prerenal azotemia due to CAH

1069:

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

356:

Category:Reproductive medicine articles by importance

4121: 1040:, which was basically restating the boxed text from 1014:

Knowledge:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology

3587:

Family Planning in Sub Saharan Africa Page Proposal

3082:

Muslim communities will be essential to this topic.

2337:

Talk:IUD with copper#Why split IUD into 3 articles?

2086:

The two bulleted lists could be converted to prose.

2035:I pestered a couple of editors a while back, while 3398:is easy and very important to improve. Please see 1464:category:Reproductive medicine task force articles 1299:link to? I just noticed that it is a redirect to 823:United States v. One Package of Japanese Pessaries 573:Section order and naming in contraception articles 352:Category:Reproductive medicine articles by quality 348:Category:Reproductive medicine task force articles 3907:Talk:Vaginal_birth_after_caesarean#Requested_move 1778:Can we do a little informal peer review here for 3485:I just archived discussion older than 1 year to 3196:Reviewers needed for Featured Article nomination 3074:(5.B) highlights a need for universal access to 2392:ATC_code_G02#G02B_Contraceptives_for_topical_use 1899:to be GA status. Does anyone have an opinion? 1577:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new 1155:They are in the process of trying to find some. 600:article then has a "varieties" section, and the 3885:Thank you! I've added to page in my watchlist. 3234:. This really involves two separate questions: 2923:Recent changes were made to citations templates 2917:Citation templates now support more identifiers 2881:be tagged as related to reproductive medicine? 2869:I see that there is no specific task force for 1689:. We are also in the process of implementing a 1131:minimum criteria for having a Knowledge article 3972:, but it may need an expansion. I changed the 3931:used to be a (sub)stub, and was redirected to 3421:Deletion discussion - List of books about AIDS 1460:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine/Cleanup listing 2327:was renamed to the much less frequently used 2294:want this wikiproject to participate, please 1746:WP:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment#Statistics 406:Category:Unknown-importance medicine articles 374:gives the okay, I'll add this information to 311:Category:Unknown-importance medicine articles 8: 3520:article. Could somebody take a look at that? 1986:Hormonal contraception: reassessment request 910:I think another relevant example article is 828:Also, what do folks think about things like 3202:Birth control movement in the United States 1506:User:WolterBot/Cleanup listing subscription 4075:You are invited to join the discussion at 3823:I wish you all the best with the project. 3564:I've recently made major revisions to the 2267:, of unreferenced living people articles ( 1301:Reproductive endocrinology and infertility 840:- should they be in the task force or not? 698:behavioral birth control methods. Unlike 3953:(or similar) to them yourself. Thanks, 3230:A request for comment has been posted at 3149:WP:MEDMOS#Titles requiring disambiguation 2311:Recent split and renaming of IUD articles 1064:American Society of Reproductive Medicine 540:| reproductive=yes | reproductive-imp=xxx 390:Knowledge:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment 3796:Contraception in the Republic of Ireland 2797: 2668:) and should be removed till rectified: 1753:template talk:WPMED#Taskforce importance 334:| Reproductive=yes | ReproductiveImp=xxx 4093: 2570:We would like to ask you to review the 2256:Unreferenced living people articles bot 2076:Condoms can be an embarrassing purchase 1642:This is a notice to let you know about 1579:WikiProject coordinators' working group 358:, and added to the assessment table at 3570:the WikiProject Medicine quality scale 3139:Sterilization (surgical / nonsurgical) 3100:Family planning in the legacy of Islam 2996: 2992:http://www.jstor.org/stable/0123456789 2989: 2978: 2974: 2967: 2956: 2607:For the Knowledge 1.0 editorial team, 2478:Is this the task force for me to join? 2333:Talk:IUD with progestogen#Article name 1307:might be a reasonable candidate. The 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3612:Family planning in Sub-Saharan Africa 3318:Here is a excerpt from the abstract: 3232:Talk:Erection#Reverts of recent edits 3039:Family Planning in Muslim Communities 2524:GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals (GSK) 1216:Appreciate the time and effort here. 1103:Parents Via Egg Donation Organization 1081:Parents Via Egg Donation Organization 1038:Parents Via Egg Donation Organization 750:is also relevant to this task force. 7: 3768:Family planning in the United States 3673: 3537:pre-eclampsia and paternal tolerance 2180:almost all mention of birth defects, 1614:input from this task force requested 1036:Hi. I need some advice. I deleted 309:was referring to either. Maybe the 3504:Oral sex and miscarriage reduction? 3129:There is currently a discussion at 2431:devices are effective for 12 years. 2055:Use and non-use in sex work (under 305:I'm not sure either which articles 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Medicine 3773:Birth control in the United States 3124:Sterilization (surgical procedure) 2865:Is this THE task force for ob/gyn? 2685:The original OpenOffice SVX File ( 2296:add your project name to this list 1803:Image:Male reproductive system.png 1291:Reproductive medicine main article 28: 3672:I think you did really good work 1677:If you are already subscribed to 672:then (if applicable) "research"? 4070: 3674: 3437:Ongoing deletion discussion for 3175: 2161: 74:Oligospermia and Oligozoospermia 33: 22:Reproductive medicine task force 3976:to include this sense as well. 3812:Population control in Singapore 2402:and the general IUD content at 2070:are all possible topics to add. 2052:could be mentioned/linked here. 1744:if it is not specified). (See 350:, the proper sub-categories of 3857:20:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC) 2970:http://arxiv.org/abs/0123.4567 2640:07:22, 20 September 2010 (UTC) 2612:23:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 2127:09:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 2107:01:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 2021:01:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 1862:I thought that in a case like 1735:} 09:36, 15 March, 2009 (UTC) 1454:Cleanup listing for taskforce? 1074:National Gamete Donation Trust 1054:American Fertility Association 1: 4122:http://en.wikipedia.org/Islam 4089:21:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC) 3404:Talk:Birth control#Comparison 3367:Knowledge:No personal attacks 3174:Thanks for the notification. 2208:18:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 2193:19:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC) 2005:02:29, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 1703:Knowledge talk:Article alerts 1608:06:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 1568:22:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 1518:22:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 1495:20:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 1448:23:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 1434:19:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 1419:08:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 346:, articles would be added to 3919:16:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC) 3895:06:10, 19 October 2014 (UTC) 3880:04:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC) 3714:21:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC) 3690:18:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 3668:05:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 3582:17:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC) 3530:07:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 3338:My questing are as follows: 3278:terms, of a number of such? 3218:03:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC) 3072:Millennium Development Goals 2910:16:14, 14 January 2011 (UTC) 2898:Knowledge:Wikiproject ob/gyn 2875:Knowledge:Wikiproject ob/gyn 2806:for sex hormones during the 2750:04:01, 7 December 2010 (UTC) 2732:18:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 2715:17:41, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 2694:10:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 2319:, and the confusingly named 2271:) related to your project. 2251:03:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 2146:22:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 1572: 1476:02:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 1395:Reproductive health template 912:human chorionic gonadotropin 769:are medical procedures, but 746:A general concern raised at 99:21:00, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 3974:List of reproductive issues 3929:List of reproductive issues 3801:Family planning in Pakistan 3647:16:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 3602:05:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 3550:13:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 3499:13:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 3254:nocturnal penile tumescence 2891:12:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 2853:18:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 2835:11:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 2789:09:51, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 2765:11:46, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 2602:your WikiProject's feedback 1990:I've recently expanded the 1981:16:39, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1887:I think we should nominate 1573:Coordinators' working group 1385:02:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1359:08:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1341:02:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 1326:19:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 1286:23:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1258:14:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1243:00:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1226:18:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 1205:10:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 1191:20:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 1165:00:30, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 1143:20:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 1133:about their organization. 1117:18:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 1096:17:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 1027:22:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 997:22:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 959:04:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 928:02:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 862:20:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 800:19:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 732:03:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 567:21:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 557:This change has been made. 4140: 3986:18:40, 11 March 2015 (UTC) 3382:08:30, 23 April 2012 (UTC) 3360:22:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC) 3122:Correct title for article 3116:05:37, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 3092:03:36, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 2973:), now you can simply use 2871:obstetrics and gynaecology 2586:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 2582:articles with cleanup tags 2577:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 2466:20:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 2452:07:19, 12 April 2010 (UTC) 2306:02:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC) 2224:Saturday, January 23, 2010 2159: 1876:20:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 1845:06:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 1809:that is in the template. 1792:00:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1769:08:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 1540:07:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 1309:Obstetrics and gynaecology 784:21:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 700:pharmaceutical formulation 3963:03:08, 6 March 2015 (UTC) 3833:20:18, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 3758:06:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC) 3734:23:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC) 3627:here is a link to edit it 3416:23:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 3293:04:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 3190:09:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC) 3169:13:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC) 3068:World Health Organization 3034:03:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 2542:14:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC) 2416:10:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 2388:World Health Organization 2376:"IUS" implied progestogen 2349:05:58, 8 April 2010 (UTC) 2323:). Also, the article on 2263:provides a list, updated 2261:User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects 1958:19:00, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 1924:22:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1909:18:06, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 1822:21:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 1697:parameter, but forget to 1631:21:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC) 767:obstetric ultrasonography 712:03:35, 30 June 2008 (UTC) 685:00:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC) 552:04:11, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 519:00:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC) 477:22:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 463:19:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC) 448:02:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC) 426:01:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC) 397:17:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 300:12:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC) 265:00:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC) 239:23:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 218:23:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 194:21:28, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 170:08:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 155:07:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC) 78:Could someone update the 4057:10:09, 13 May 2015 (UTC) 4042:23:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC) 4022:10:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC) 4007:23:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC) 3786:Family planning in India 3475:15:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 3460:07:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 3439:List of books about AIDS 3427:List of books about AIDS 3180:I made a comment there. 3145:Sterilization (medicine) 2534:Maitri Shah, PharmD, GSK 2508:04:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC) 2493:14:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC) 2220:WP 1.0 assessment system 2064:"partner categorization" 1295:What should the heading 1044:. However, the author, 616:, and "formulations" in 524:Changing task force tags 492:http://stats.grok.se/en/ 3905:I made this request at 3866:This is a notice about 3843:There is a discussion, 3791:Family planning in Iran 3655:Birth Control in Africa 3305:I would like to report 3049:Family Planning in Iran 2662:File:MenstrualCycle.png 2647:File:MenstrualCycle.png 2236:WP 1.0 project homepage 2214:WP 1.0 bot announcement 1854:Could someone confirm: 1797:Graphic on project page 1530:Added to project page. 1462:, but just articles in 645:emergency contraception 251:Here's the link to the 3909:. Please have a look. 3614:, and link to it from 2815: 2657: 1992:hormonal contraception 1930:HIV GA Sweeps: On Hold 1681:, it is now easier to 1086:Thanks for your time. 1032:Help and advice needed 984:Early pregnancy factor 771:early pregnancy factor 583:calendar-based methods 106:Parturition/Childbirth 3992:uterine prolapse page 2801: 2656: 2598:Knowledge for Schools 2097:Any other thoughts? 1739:Taskforce-imp ranking 1666:and other workflows ( 1656:Articles for deletion 1373:Reproductive medicine 1297:Reproductive medicine 97:comment was added at 46:of past discussions. 4110:. Alternative link: 3970:Gynaecology#Diseases 3808:(in the Philippines) 3610:Writing the article 3388:Please help improve 2804:prediction intervals 2594:One Laptop per Child 2396:IUD with progestogen 2380:Talk:IUD with copper 2372:"IUD" implied copper 2329:IUD with progestogen 1780:Gestational diabetes 1774:Gestational diabetes 1687:request new features 1660:Requests for comment 838:Guttmacher Institute 643:). An exception is 3968:There is a list at 3924:Reproductive issues 3076:Reproductive health 2649:: factual accuracy? 2520:Maitri Shah, PharmD 2404:Intrauterine device 2368:Intrauterine system 2364:Intrauterine device 2325:Intrauterine system 2317:Intrauterine device 1807:Image:Sperm-egg.jpg 1404:Reproductive health 1305:Reproductive health 587:fertility awareness 507:intrauterine device 283:be so burdensome). 3620:Sub-Saharan Africa 3514:academic consensus 3310:The study is here 2816: 2687:link on image page 2658: 2553:Knowledge 1.0 team 2529:Cervarix Talk Page 2176:this disputed edit 1059:American Red Cross 759:Menstrual disorder 503:coitus interruptus 184:up to FA status? 121:Human reproduction 3698:Archived a thread 3556:Re-assessment of 3259:informally called 3245:Is the statement: 2997:|jstor=0123456789 2802:Averages and 90% 2623:- The version of 2522:, and I work for 2249: 2155:Gulf War syndrome 2057:Condom#Prevalence 1718: 1610: 1604: 1314:Template:medicine 1256: 1224: 1203: 1163: 1115: 1107:Steven Fruitsmaak 1094: 1012:EPF should be in 748:the doctor's mess 202:Talk:Condom/to do 71: 70: 58: 57: 52:current talk page 4131: 4124: 4119: 4113: 4098: 4074: 4073: 4049:Mikael Häggström 4014:Mikael Häggström 3978:Mikael Häggström 3945: 3939: 3911:Mikael Häggström 3887:Mikael Häggström 3862:Expert attention 3825:Mikael Häggström 3780:One-child policy 3682:Mikael Häggström 3679: 3678: 3677: 3639:Mikael Häggström 3574:Mikael Häggström 3542:Mikael Häggström 3491:Mikael Häggström 3467:Mikael Häggström 3182:Mikael Häggström 3179: 3108:Mikael Häggström 3032: 2998: 2994: 2987: 2986: 2976: 2975:|arxiv=0123.4567 2972: 2965: 2964: 2954: 2948: 2944: 2938: 2934: 2928: 2902:Mikael Häggström 2883:Mikael Häggström 2845:Mikael Häggström 2827:Mikael Häggström 2781:Mikael Häggström 2757:Mikael Häggström 2500:Mikael Häggström 2485:Mikael Häggström 2239: 2171: 2165: 2164: 1934:I have reviewed 1709:Message sent by 1708: 1696: 1601: 1596: 1593: 1586: 1550:RFC notification 1504:articles}} (See 1408: 1402: 1252: 1220: 1199: 1159: 1127:reliable sources 1109: 1090: 834:One child policy 541: 537: 531: 383: 377: 369: 365: 345: 339: 335: 326: 320: 153: 150: 147: 102: 67: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 4139: 4138: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4130: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4120: 4116: 4099: 4095: 4071: 4068: 4030: 3994: 3952: 3943: 3937: 3926: 3903: 3864: 3841: 3743: 3721: 3700: 3675: 3616:Family planning 3589: 3562: 3506: 3483: 3423: 3393: 3303: 3228: 3206:the review page 3198: 3127: 3045:Family Planning 3041: 3011: 2980: 2977:, likewise for 2958: 2952: 2946: 2942: 2936: 2932: 2926: 2920: 2867: 2808:menstrual cycle 2651: 2625:Cervical cancer 2621:Cervical cancer 2559:, then article 2549: 2516: 2480: 2400:IUD with copper 2339:. Thank you. 2321:IUD with copper 2313: 2287: 2258: 2216: 2172: 2169: 2167: 2162: 2158: 2033: 2003: 1988: 1979: 1969:Template:Condom 1965: 1963:Condom template 1932: 1922: 1893:WP:Good article 1885: 1852: 1829: 1799: 1776: 1741: 1730: 1694: 1652:fully-automated 1640: 1616: 1599: 1589: 1575: 1552: 1456: 1446: 1406: 1400: 1397: 1339: 1293: 1284: 1241: 1046:User:Marnad1963 1034: 1025: 926: 830:Family planning 813:categorization. 782: 755:Menstrual cycle 744: 683: 665:WP:MEDMOS#Drugs 649:WP:MEDMOS#Drugs 622:WP:MEDMOS#Drugs 579:WP:MEDMOS#Drugs 575: 539: 535: 529: 526: 517: 381: 375: 367: 364:ReproductiveImp 363: 343: 337: 333: 324: 318: 298: 277: 216: 178: 148: 145: 142: 108: 92: 76: 63: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 4137: 4135: 4126: 4125: 4114: 4092: 4067: 4063:Discussion at 4061: 4060: 4059: 4029: 4028:Pap test edits 4026: 4025: 4024: 3993: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3947: 3925: 3922: 3902: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3863: 3860: 3840: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3814: 3809: 3803: 3798: 3793: 3788: 3783: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3741: 3720: 3717: 3699: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3650: 3649: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3623: 3588: 3585: 3561: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3505: 3502: 3482: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3435: 3434: 3429: 3422: 3419: 3408:75.166.200.250 3392: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3369: 3352:188.25.160.111 3337: 3332: 3302: 3296: 3280: 3279: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3247: 3246: 3243: 3227: 3221: 3197: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3153: 3152: 3142: 3126: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3040: 3037: 3008: 3007: 2919: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2866: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2837: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2735: 2734: 2718: 2717: 2702: 2701: 2680: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2660:Hi, the image 2650: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2618: 2548: 2545: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2439: 2435: 2432: 2419: 2418: 2312: 2309: 2279: 2257: 2254: 2215: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2174:Please review 2160: 2157: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2130: 2129: 2114: 2095: 2094: 2087: 2084: 2071: 2053: 2050:Condom machine 2032: 2025: 2024: 2023: 1999: 1987: 1984: 1975: 1964: 1961: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1918: 1884: 1879: 1851: 1848: 1828: 1825: 1798: 1795: 1775: 1772: 1740: 1737: 1726: 1679:Article Alerts 1646:Article alerts 1639: 1637:Article alerts 1634: 1615: 1612: 1587:Delievered by 1574: 1571: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1498: 1497: 1483: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1442: 1436: 1396: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1371:I started the 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1344: 1343: 1335: 1292: 1289: 1280: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1237: 1229: 1228: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1120: 1119: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1056: 1033: 1030: 1021: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 999: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 922: 916:pregnancy test 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 864: 844: 843: 842: 841: 826: 820: 817: 814: 810: 803: 802: 778: 763:pregnancy test 743: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 715: 714: 695: 694: 693: 679: 657:tubal ligation 574: 571: 570: 569: 525: 522: 513: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 431: 430: 429: 428: 413: 409: 400: 399: 329: 328: 294: 276: 273: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 244: 243: 242: 241: 227: 221: 220: 212: 177: 174: 173: 172: 139: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 107: 104: 75: 72: 69: 68: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4136: 4123: 4118: 4115: 4112: 4109: 4106: 4102: 4097: 4094: 4091: 4090: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4066: 4062: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3979: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3951: 3942: 3934: 3930: 3923: 3921: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3908: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3861: 3859: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3849:Lightbreather 3846: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3815: 3813: 3810: 3807: 3804: 3802: 3799: 3797: 3794: 3792: 3789: 3787: 3784: 3781: 3778: 3774: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3766: 3765: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3740: 3736: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3718: 3716: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3706: 3697: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3656: 3652: 3651: 3648: 3644: 3640: 3637: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3621: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3608: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3599: 3595: 3586: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3538: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3522:188.25.159.53 3519: 3515: 3511: 3503: 3501: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3457: 3453: 3452: 3446: 3444: 3440: 3433: 3430: 3428: 3425: 3424: 3420: 3418: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3396:Birth control 3391: 3390:Birth control 3387: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3370: 3368: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3347: 3342: 3339: 3335: 3330: 3326: 3323: 3319: 3316: 3315: 3312: 3308: 3300: 3297: 3295: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3285:Milkunderwood 3277: 3273: 3268: 3267:morning glory 3264: 3261: 3260: 3255: 3251: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3244: 3241: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3233: 3226: 3222: 3220: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3208:. Thanks. -- 3207: 3203: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3178: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3150: 3146: 3143: 3140: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3132: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094:mschweickart 3093: 3089: 3085: 3079: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3064: 3061: 3056: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3038: 3036: 3035: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3018: 3014: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3000: 2993: 2985:|0123456789}} 2984: 2971: 2962: 2951: 2941: 2931: 2924: 2918: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2864: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2800: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2677: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2667: 2663: 2655: 2648: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2626: 2622: 2619: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2605: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2589: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2578: 2573: 2568: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2546: 2544: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2530: 2525: 2521: 2513: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2477: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2440: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2428:Types of IUDs 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2360:Dalkon Shield 2357: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2310: 2308: 2307: 2304: 2299: 2297: 2293: 2288: 2285: 2276: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2255: 2253: 2252: 2247: 2243: 2237: 2233: 2232:summary table 2229: 2225: 2221: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2181: 2177: 2156: 2153: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2115: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2100: 2092: 2088: 2085: 2082: 2078: 2075: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2051: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2042: 2038: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1993: 1985: 1983: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1962: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1937: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1849: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1833: 1832:Amniocentesis 1827:Amniocentesis 1826: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1810: 1808: 1804: 1796: 1794: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1773: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1756: 1754: 1749: 1747: 1738: 1736: 1734: 1729: 1724: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1706: 1704: 1700: 1692: 1691:"news system" 1688: 1684: 1680: 1675: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1613: 1611: 1609: 1605: 1602: 1594: 1592: 1582: 1580: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1549: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1405: 1394: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1290: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1113: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1084: 1082: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1060: 1057: 1055: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1031: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1015: 998: 994: 990: 985: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 960: 956: 952: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 892: 889: 886: 883: 880: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 863: 859: 855: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 839: 835: 831: 827: 824: 821: 818: 815: 811: 807: 806: 805: 804: 801: 797: 793: 788: 787: 786: 785: 781: 777: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 751: 749: 742:Project scope 741: 733: 729: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 713: 709: 705: 701: 696: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 682: 678: 673: 669: 666: 660: 658: 653: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 625: 623: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 594: 592: 588: 584: 580: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 534: 523: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 494: 493: 478: 474: 470: 466: 465: 464: 460: 456: 451: 450: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 427: 423: 419: 414: 410: 407: 404: 403: 402: 401: 398: 395: 391: 387: 380: 373: 361: 357: 353: 349: 342: 331: 330: 323: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 302: 301: 297: 293: 289: 284: 281: 274: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 240: 236: 232: 228: 225: 224: 223: 222: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 198: 197: 196: 195: 191: 187: 183: 176:Condom to FA? 175: 171: 168: 164: 159: 158: 157: 156: 152: 151: 137: 136:Sexual health 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 116:Birth control 114: 113: 112: 105: 103: 100: 96: 90: 86: 81: 73: 66: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 4117: 4096: 4069: 4034:Doc michelle 4031: 3995: 3955:WhatamIdoing 3927: 3904: 3865: 3842: 3748: 3744: 3737: 3722: 3703: 3701: 3660:Juliannadrew 3594:Juliannadrew 3590: 3563: 3507: 3484: 3449: 3447: 3436: 3394: 3350: 3346:User:Yonskii 3343: 3340: 3336: 3331: 3327: 3324: 3320: 3317: 3307:User:Yonskii 3304: 3299:User:Yonskii 3281: 3266: 3263:morning wood 3262: 3258: 3257: 3239: 3229: 3223:Edit war at 3199: 3154: 3144: 3138: 3128: 3099: 3084:Mschweickart 3080: 3065: 3057: 3042: 3009: 3001: 2963:|0123.4567}} 2940:cite journal 2921: 2878: 2868: 2742:WhatamIdoing 2681: 2659: 2609:SelectionBot 2606: 2590: 2575: 2569: 2560: 2550: 2517: 2481: 2314: 2300: 2291: 2289: 2286:<<< 2277: 2264: 2259: 2223: 2217: 2200:WhatamIdoing 2179: 2173: 2138:WhatamIdoing 2099:WhatamIdoing 2096: 2081:house of fun 2034: 2013:WhatamIdoing 1989: 1966: 1939: 1933: 1901:WhatamIdoing 1896: 1886: 1861: 1856: 1853: 1837:WhatamIdoing 1830: 1811: 1800: 1784:WhatamIdoing 1777: 1757: 1750: 1742: 1720: 1707: 1698: 1695:display=none 1678: 1676: 1644: 1643: 1641: 1617: 1595: 1590: 1583: 1576: 1553: 1487:WhatamIdoing 1457: 1426:WhatamIdoing 1398: 1294: 1274: 1209: 1183:WhatamIdoing 1135:WhatamIdoing 1085: 1078: 1035: 1011: 989:WhatamIdoing 854:WhatamIdoing 792:WhatamIdoing 752: 745: 704:WhatamIdoing 674: 670: 661: 654: 626: 602:cervical cap 595: 591:cervical cap 576: 527: 495: 489: 469:WhatamIdoing 455:WhatamIdoing 418:WhatamIdoing 372:WhatamIdoing 315:WhatamIdoing 307:WhatamIdoing 285: 280:WhatamIdoing 278: 257:WhatamIdoing 231:WhatamIdoing 186:WhatamIdoing 179: 143: 140: 109: 80:Oligospermia 77: 64: 47: 41: 3518:miscarriage 3066:One of the 2567:algorithm. 2518:My name is 2390:, at shown 2301:Thank you. 2185:208.54.5.57 2068:serosorting 2031:to FA level 1946:Nehrams2020 1711:User:Addbot 1699:give a link 1683:report bugs 1664:Peer review 416:articles. 394:Scott Alter 253:FA criteria 167:Scott Alter 93:—Preceding 40:This is an 3950:Obstetrics 3946:me or add 3782:(in China) 3487:/Archive 1 3161:Mitch Ames 2966:(or worse 2228:WP 1.0 bot 2041:one editor 1967:I've made 1733:WP Physics 1721:Thanks. — 1623:Beeblebrox 1560:Ferrylodge 370:"). Once 368:Importance 4081:Elizium23 3948:|field = 3933:Bioethics 3566:Pregnancy 3558:Pregnancy 3210:Noleander 2925:(such as 2565:WikiTrust 2238:. — Carl 1668:full list 637:diaphragm 610:diaphragm 412:later...) 131:Fertility 126:Pregnancy 65:Archive 1 4108:16776638 3999:Docrenee 3872:Iceblock 3750:TINGLED1 3726:TINGLED1 3658:further. 3560:, please 3510:Oral sex 3481:Archived 3402:through 3225:Erection 3021:contribs 3013:Headbomb 2950:cite web 2930:citation 2691:Eleassar 2561:versions 2458:Arcadian 2438:clearer. 2408:Arcadian 2356:Paragard 2166:Resolved 2027:Getting 1728:κοντριβς 1723:Headbomb 1210:ADDENDUM 724:Arcadian 20:‎ | 3631:forking 3104:preview 3025:physics 2724:Richiez 2707:Richiez 2290:If you 1954:contrib 1600:Disable 1591:§hepBot 1482:handle. 322:C-Class 149:Panchal 95:undated 43:archive 3325:(...) 3060:Muslim 3053:Qur’an 2374:, and 2292:do not 2226:, the 2091:WP:DUE 2066:, and 2037:Condom 2029:Condom 1889:Condom 1882:Condom 1868:Ibrmrn 1250:Hiding 1218:Hiding 1197:Hiding 1157:Hiding 1105:is. -- 1088:Hiding 598:condom 388:, and 354:& 206:condom 182:Condom 146:—Ketan 85:Ibrmrn 3374:Zodon 3276:slang 3029:books 2990:|url= 2983:JSTOR 2968:|url= 2961:arxiv 2632:Zodon 2444:Zodon 2341:Zodon 2303:Okip 2282:: --> 2281:: --> 2280:: --> 2265:daily 2222:. On 2119:Zodon 1814:Zodon 1761:Zodon 1532:Zodon 1510:Zodon 1468:Zodon 1411:Zodon 1351:Zodon 1318:Zodon 1112:Reply 951:Zodon 836:, or 559:Zodon 544:Zodon 533:WPMED 440:Zodon 392:. -- 379:WPMED 341:WPMED 336:" to 16:< 4105:PMID 4085:talk 4053:talk 4038:talk 4018:talk 4003:talk 3982:talk 3959:talk 3941:ping 3915:talk 3891:talk 3876:talk 3853:talk 3829:talk 3754:talk 3730:talk 3710:talk 3705:Cirt 3686:talk 3664:talk 3643:talk 3618:and 3598:talk 3578:talk 3546:talk 3526:talk 3495:talk 3471:talk 3456:talk 3451:Cirt 3412:talk 3378:talk 3356:talk 3289:talk 3240:both 3214:talk 3186:talk 3165:talk 3112:talk 3088:talk 3017:talk 2988:and 2979:|id= 2957:|id= 2906:talk 2887:talk 2849:talk 2841:here 2831:talk 2785:talk 2761:talk 2746:talk 2728:talk 2711:talk 2636:talk 2596:and 2538:talk 2504:talk 2489:talk 2462:talk 2448:talk 2412:talk 2406:. -- 2366:and 2358:and 2345:talk 2335:and 2269:BLPs 2246:talk 2204:talk 2189:talk 2142:talk 2123:talk 2103:talk 2017:talk 1997:Lyrl 1973:Lyrl 1950:talk 1941:here 1916:Lyrl 1905:talk 1891:for 1872:talk 1841:talk 1818:talk 1788:talk 1765:talk 1715:here 1685:and 1672:here 1650:, a 1627:talk 1564:talk 1556:here 1536:talk 1514:talk 1491:talk 1472:talk 1440:Lyrl 1430:talk 1415:talk 1381:talk 1377:Ekem 1355:talk 1333:Lyrl 1322:talk 1278:Lyrl 1235:Lyrl 1187:talk 1139:talk 1042:here 1019:Lyrl 993:talk 955:talk 920:Lyrl 858:talk 796:talk 776:Lyrl 765:and 728:talk 708:talk 677:Lyrl 629:COCP 618:COCP 612:and 604:and 596:The 563:talk 548:talk 511:Lyrl 505:and 499:COCP 473:talk 459:talk 444:talk 422:talk 362:. " 292:Lyrl 261:talk 235:talk 210:Lyrl 190:talk 163:Lyrl 89:talk 4079:. 3441:at 3344:Is 3265:or 3070:’s 2879:not 2604:! 2362:): 2242:CBM 1936:HIV 1897:not 1864:CAH 1755:.) 1748:.) 1618:at 641:IUD 633:POP 614:IUS 606:IUD 208:. 91:) 4087:) 4055:) 4040:) 4020:) 4005:) 3984:) 3961:) 3944:}} 3938:{{ 3917:) 3893:) 3878:) 3855:) 3831:) 3756:) 3732:) 3712:) 3688:) 3666:) 3645:) 3600:) 3580:) 3548:) 3528:) 3497:) 3473:) 3458:) 3445:. 3414:) 3406:. 3380:) 3358:) 3291:) 3256:, 3216:) 3188:) 3167:) 3114:) 3106:. 3102:- 3090:) 3027:/ 3023:/ 3019:/ 2999:. 2995:→ 2981:{{ 2959:{{ 2953:}} 2947:{{ 2945:, 2943:}} 2937:{{ 2935:, 2933:}} 2927:{{ 2908:) 2889:) 2851:) 2833:) 2787:) 2763:) 2748:) 2730:) 2713:) 2638:) 2540:) 2506:) 2491:) 2464:) 2450:) 2414:) 2347:) 2298:. 2244:· 2206:) 2191:) 2168:– 2144:) 2125:) 2105:) 2093:]. 2062:, 2043:: 2019:) 1956:) 1952:• 1907:) 1874:) 1843:) 1820:) 1790:) 1767:) 1731:– 1705:. 1674:. 1662:, 1658:, 1629:) 1566:) 1538:) 1516:) 1508:) 1493:) 1474:) 1432:) 1417:) 1407:}} 1401:{{ 1383:) 1357:) 1324:) 1189:) 1141:) 995:) 957:) 890:, 887:, 884:, 881:, 860:) 832:, 798:) 730:) 710:) 635:, 631:, 593:) 589:, 585:, 565:) 550:) 536:}} 530:{{ 475:) 461:) 446:) 424:) 384:, 382:}} 376:{{ 344:}} 338:{{ 325:}} 319:{{ 263:) 237:) 192:) 4083:( 4051:( 4036:( 4016:( 4001:( 3980:( 3957:( 3913:( 3889:( 3874:( 3851:( 3827:( 3752:( 3728:( 3708:( 3684:( 3662:( 3641:( 3622:. 3596:( 3576:( 3544:( 3524:( 3493:( 3469:( 3454:( 3410:( 3376:( 3354:( 3287:( 3269:" 3212:( 3184:( 3163:( 3151:. 3110:( 3086:( 3031:} 3015:{ 2904:( 2885:( 2847:( 2829:( 2814:. 2783:( 2759:( 2744:( 2726:( 2709:( 2634:( 2536:( 2502:( 2487:( 2460:( 2446:( 2410:( 2343:( 2248:) 2240:( 2202:( 2187:( 2140:( 2121:( 2101:( 2015:( 2001:C 1977:C 1948:( 1920:C 1903:( 1870:( 1839:( 1816:( 1786:( 1763:( 1725:{ 1717:. 1625:( 1603:) 1597:( 1562:( 1534:( 1512:( 1489:( 1470:( 1444:C 1428:( 1413:( 1379:( 1353:( 1337:C 1320:( 1282:C 1254:T 1239:C 1222:T 1201:T 1185:( 1161:T 1137:( 1114:) 1110:( 1092:T 1023:C 991:( 953:( 924:C 856:( 794:( 780:C 726:( 706:( 681:C 561:( 546:( 515:C 471:( 457:( 442:( 420:( 296:C 259:( 233:( 214:C 188:( 101:. 87:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Medicine/Reproductive medicine task force/Archive 1 - Knowledge

Index