199:
who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in
January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at
603:). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found
42:
536:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
404:
A lot of the early articles I started used Chris
Geelhart's roadgeek site for the mileage citation, but after I was able to access the NDOR site for the first time (thanks to a more operational computer), I've used that. It was something I was going to get around to at some point, but I let myself
198:
proposal for an appreciation week to end on
Knowledge (XXG) Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals
98:
Do we do one big spurs and links article or do we do one for each and every one? 90% of them (at least) don't have much of a description other than they are a spur to city X from
Highway Y. It would seem easier to just do a large graphic article than one on each of the ones in the highway system.
388:
site. Looking through it, this is the official NDOR data. As such, shouldn't this information be used to determine the actual length of each highway, and each page updated as necessary? I'm sorry if someone has already brought this up in the past, but it just occurred to me right now to ask.
218:
I thought it was best to do each section of
Highway 2 with an infobox for each section. Not sure if that was the best idea, as I had nothing to go on as a basis to decide whether that was a good idea. But it seemed better than one big infobox for a highway with 2 distinct sections. I hate to
337:
I finally had enough patience to deal with PDF files on my computer, and linked up with the NDOR site, which refers to all U.S. Routes as U.S. Highways, so I changed all references to U.S. Route x to U.S. Highway x in all
Nebraska Highway articles and will in all future articles.
498:
with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the
Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 scheme! For the
352:
Several articles exist for these, but all they really say is either "This is a spur road into city X" or "This is a link road connecting
Highway Y with Highway Z". While I think the system is notable, the individual roads are probably not and can probably be covered in the
712:
109:
I can't see spur and link routes getting their own articles - If I'm correct (I'm not too familiar with
Nebraska) they're Nebraska's version of "county routes" so to speak. Most county highways should not get their own article depending on the number of routes. --•
539:
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. —
252:
Since there is no NE 30, as there is a US 30, should I fix up the infoboxes such that if the next route is a US route? Currently, on the
Nebraska Highway 31 page, the previous route is Nebraska Highway 29 and really, it should be US 30.
230:
with the termini being the farthest left to farthest right (assume looking north or west ;) ). Then use the article itself to state where the intermediate termini are (I assume that most of it was supplanted by a US route or I-80?) •
53:
203:
where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.
405:
get distracted easily on here, plus I don't generally have a lot of time to dedicate to Knowledge (XXG). I sometimes wonder if I'm the only one doing Nebraska highway articles. Feel free to update as necessary.
297:
article. Is there anything at all to make it worth keeping as a separate article? After all, once I get around to finishing it, it will largely be a list of highways, which can be on the regular list article.
476:
469:
354:
626:, which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the
423:
Bah. I wish I knew of this site before I started updating the highway pages. Guess I have to start from NE 1 again, lol. I decided to come help this project along since I did all I could for the
533:
487:. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.
450:
495:
313:
453:, we at the Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at
286:
716:
700:
454:
619:
21:
634:
to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Knowledge (XXG):PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at
488:
677:
200:
676:
Does your project care about what happens to the talk pages of articles that have been replaced with redirects? If so, please provide your input at
17:
500:
465:
represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
623:
615:
715:
will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the
562:
294:
588:
592:
753:
635:
660:
138:
Thanks for the clarification. Unless you have enough detail on each route, an article for each route is overkill. --•
757:
731:
689:
522:
436:
414:
398:
370:
342:
327:
302:
279:
257:
241:
223:
208:
183:
167:
148:
133:
120:
103:
88:
48:
604:
600:
578:
569:
312:
All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
587:
subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering
27:
484:
381:
358:
380:
This is something I noticed when going from page to page adding to them and cleaning them up. On the page for
596:
229:
Lets keep it to 1 infobox per article - seperate the route by section in the junction list by a <hr: -->
410:
366:
293:
I created this article, but I'm now convinced, at least in my mind, that it should all be merged into the
264:
195:
742:
268:
77:
711:
will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's
41:
750:
239:
181:
146:
118:
432:
394:
205:
424:
553:
514:
406:
362:
339:
299:
254:
220:
164:
130:
100:
665:
584:
129:. I would personally compare them to Missouri's supplemental routes, only not so extensive.
685:
647:
219:
imagine how much space goes to infoboxes on the three-part (or is it 4 part?) Highway 66.
747:
745:
regarding the potential use of coordinates in highway articles. Your input is welcomed. --
708:
317:
232:
174:
139:
111:
385:
357:
article. My question is what to do about the original articles. (This is also posted on
73:
726:
655:
646:
to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome
472:, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
428:
390:
72:
This project's userbox should be a subpage of this project page, not a template per
543:
504:
681:
643:
125:
They are a part of the state highway system. A link describing them is at
126:
722:
194:
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of
699:
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the
468:
The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of
163:
Should they get 1 infobox for each section or 1 for the whole route?
173:
probably one article - though i think that can be negotiable. --•
483:
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at
475:
A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as
355:
List of Nebraska Connecting Link, Spur, and Recreation Highways
36:
561:
on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at
427:
project for the time being. Don't feel too alone now! --
672:
Does your WikiProject care about talk pages of redirects?
314:
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
287:
List of Nebraska Spur, Link and Recreation Highways
491:is already finding and listing C-Class articles.
267:, the previous route for NE 31 should be US 30. --
28:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Nebraska Highways
741:There is currently a discussion taking place at
532:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new
622:. We are also in the process of implementing a
384:, the length of the highway is referenced by
308:TfD nomination of All USRD Clean-up Templates
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads
348:Nebraska Connecting Link and Spur highways
678:User:Mikaey/Request for Input/ListasBot 3
201:User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week
575:This is a notice to let you know about
534:WikiProject coordinators' working group
445:Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme
127:http://www.dm.net/~chris-g/ne-spur.html
737:RFC on coordinates in highway articles
7:
636:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Article alerts
295:List of Nebraska numbered highways
35:
610:If you are already subscribed to
376:References for length parameters
159:What about discontinuous routes?
40:
51:on 1 April 2011. The result of
668:} 09:27, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
1:
758:01:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
563:06:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
343:07:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
209:16:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
184:05:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
168:05:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
149:15:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
134:06:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
121:05:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
104:05:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
89:22:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
732:03:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
527:
224:12:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
47:This page was nominated for
528:Coordinators' working group
94:What about spurs and links?
773:
705:Saturday, January 23, 2010
437:18:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
415:10:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
399:08:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
371:21:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
328:16:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
280:21:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
258:21:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
242:00:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
190:Knowledge (XXG) Day Awards
630:parameter, but forget to
485:Category:C-Class_articles
303:06:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
701:WP 1.0 assessment system
690:02:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
523:21:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
717:WP 1.0 project homepage
695:WP 1.0 bot announcement
614:, it is now easier to
599:and other workflows (
589:Articles for deletion
620:request new features
593:Requests for comment
501:1.0 Editorial Team
236:
178:
143:
115:
730:
651:
565:
559:
520:
234:
176:
141:
113:
65:
64:
26:(Redirected from
764:
720:
642:Message sent by
641:
629:
556:
551:
548:
541:
517:
512:
509:
324:
321:
275:
272:
248:Infobox question
237:
179:
144:
116:
84:
81:
44:
37:
31:
772:
771:
767:
766:
765:
763:
762:
761:
739:
697:
674:
663:
627:
585:fully-automated
573:
554:
544:
530:
515:
505:
496:leave a message
447:
378:
350:
335:
322:
319:
310:
291:
273:
270:
250:
233:
216:
214:Added Highway 2
192:
175:
161:
140:
112:
96:
82:
79:
70:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
770:
768:
738:
735:
696:
693:
673:
670:
659:
612:Article Alerts
579:Article alerts
572:
570:Article alerts
567:
542:Delievered by
529:
526:
481:
480:
477:described here
473:
466:
451:may have heard
446:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
418:
417:
389:Thanks. :) --
377:
374:
349:
346:
334:
331:
309:
306:
290:
284:
283:
282:
249:
246:
245:
244:
215:
212:
191:
188:
187:
186:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
153:
152:
151:
95:
92:
69:
66:
63:
62:
54:the discussion
45:
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
769:
760:
759:
756:
755:
752:
749:
744:
736:
734:
733:
728:
724:
718:
714:
713:summary table
710:
706:
702:
694:
692:
691:
687:
683:
679:
671:
669:
667:
662:
657:
652:
649:
645:
639:
637:
633:
625:
624:"news system"
621:
617:
613:
608:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
581:
580:
571:
568:
566:
564:
560:
557:
549:
547:
537:
535:
525:
524:
521:
518:
510:
508:
502:
497:
492:
490:
486:
478:
474:
471:
467:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
452:
444:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:
420:
419:
416:
412:
408:
403:
402:
401:
400:
396:
392:
387:
383:
375:
373:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
347:
345:
344:
341:
332:
330:
329:
326:
325:
316:. Thank you.
315:
307:
305:
304:
301:
296:
288:
285:
281:
278:
277:
266:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
247:
243:
240:
238:
228:
227:
226:
225:
222:
213:
211:
210:
207:
206:Badbilltucker
202:
197:
189:
185:
182:
180:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
158:
150:
147:
145:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
124:
123:
122:
119:
117:
108:
107:
106:
105:
102:
93:
91:
90:
87:
86:
75:
67:
60:
56:
55:
50:
46:
43:
39:
38:
29:
23:
19:
746:
740:
704:
698:
675:
653:
640:
631:
628:display=none
611:
609:
577:
576:
574:
550:
545:
538:
531:
511:
506:
493:
482:
462:
448:
407:DandyDan2007
379:
363:DandyDan2007
351:
340:DandyDan2007
336:
318:
311:
300:DandyDan2007
292:
269:
265:WP:USRD/INNA
255:DandyDan2007
251:
221:DandyDan2007
217:
193:
165:DandyDan2007
162:
131:DandyDan2007
101:DandyDan2007
97:
78:
71:
58:
52:
680:. Thanks,
644:User:Addbot
632:give a link
616:report bugs
597:Peer review
463:new C-Class
333:US Highways
196:Esperanza's
59:Closed/Keep
709:WP 1.0 bot
666:WP Physics
654:Thanks. —
425:New Jersey
359:WT:USRD/NT
235:master_son
177:master_son
142:master_son
114:master_son
719:. — Carl
601:full list
455:WP:ASSESS
661:κοντριβς
656:Headbomb
470:a rubric
429:Dbm11085
391:Dbm11085
49:deletion
22:Nebraska
20: |
555:Disable
546:§hepBot
516:Disable
507:§hepBot
494:Please
489:The bot
449:As you
289:article
68:Userbox
743:WT:HWY
707:, the
320:master
703:. On
382:US 26
74:WP:UM
16:<
754:7754
751:chen
727:talk
686:talk
682:Matt
648:here
618:and
605:here
583:, a
461:The
433:talk
411:talk
395:talk
386:this
367:talk
263:Per
76:. --
57:was
723:CBM
323:son
748:Rs
725:·
688:)
664:–
638:.
607:.
595:,
591:,
503:,
457:.
435:)
413:)
397:)
369:)
361:)
729:)
721:(
684:(
658:{
650:.
558:)
552:(
519:)
513:(
479:.
431:(
409:(
393:(
365:(
276:F
274:M
271:T
85:F
83:M
80:T
61:.
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
