Knowledge

talk:WikiProject California/Southern California task force/Archive 5 - Knowledge

Source šŸ“

229:). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found 96: 1577: 1317: 1289: 1261: 1022:
County is to be lumped together with all other counties of the same name, then we should do the same for the many different cities and locales that go by Los Angeles, San Francisco, London, or even California (there is a California, Pennsylvania). Thank you for your feedback and the support of those who are part of this Wikiproject would be greatly appreciated. --
162:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. 924: 806:
Why did he have three cities w/a lot of information and the rest with none? Some metro are anchored by two cities not just one. For exampe the Inland Empire, Riverside and San Bernardino are equally as important to one another, the IE centers around both cities not just Riverside, the IE article says
424:
To clarify, you would replace WikiProject Southern California template with the California-wide template having Southern California Task force identified? Also, I think there are some reasons to keep SoCal separate from Cal-wide, at least as a Task Force, not merge it away altogether. SoCal is very
1700:
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian in Residence at the Metropolitan New York Library Council. I was contacted by a museum research librarian in L.A. about the GLAM-Wiki projects we're doing in New York and am looking for people or a GLAM-Wiki group in L.A. to refer her to. If you are a GLAM organizer and are in
1453:
Mexico doesn't have projects for it's states, it just has one big Mexico project, I think that that's because of a lack of activity at Mexico. I'm not proposing a whole new project here, I'm proposing expanding this one. Considering how integrated the history of the Californians is, and particularly
1236:
task force merge, and moving to inactive seemed less likely to ruffle any feathers. But if you want to do a full on removal of the names, or tweak that template that would be fine, as the history will still have them. I had planned to merge and simplify those participant lists, but never got around
802:
I added the metro because they summarize the regions where the cities are, so why cant we have that? I relates to the cities, its not like I'm puting types of cars in the section, where that has nothing to do with cities in SoCal. Someone reading about the cities in SoCal might want to know SoCals
701:
None of the various todo lists appear to have been updated in a while. Personally I liked them in the past, but at this point a post to a project talk page is more productive, otherwise we've got a host of templates to place on the article itself, which a bot will pick up. I'll probably go through
1021:
and create a disambiguation page for the others. The most famous Orange County is the one in California, an it's not even close. When traveling around the United States or abroad, I say I am from Orange County and people immediately know where I am from, no one asks "which one?" Also, if Orange
443:
Yes, I would be replacing WikiProject Southern California template with the California-wide template having Southern California Task force identified. See the articles I mentioned for how that would look. Also, yes there are reasons to keep the a SOCAL project separate from other regions of
409:, and several other resource merges. My main concern though is the overlap in unassessed pages. If someone wants to go through and assess the pages or tweak the templates that is fine by me, but judging on the level of activity on this talk page I don't think this project is very active. - 944:
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as
1454:
how integrated the topics of Southern California and the inhabited bit of Baja are, it just seems like this project would be better suited to handle Baja stuff then the big Mexico project would be. There's no reason this task force couldn't be under both Cal and Mex.
165:
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. ā€”
1749: 766: 425:
different, separated from NoCal, and both are larger than most other U.S. states. But, overall, I don't mind having some merger of functions like assessment which can be shared state-wide, although identifying the SoCal ones in their separate task force.
1385:. In addition to the reasons given in that discussion, the vast majority of the Baja population lives just south of the border (more specifiably in a strip extending from the border to 15 miles south of the border, consisting of the cities of 927:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (ā™¦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at 1118:
A discussion of interest to WikiProject California and the Southern California task force on merging the Los Angeles metropolitan area and Inland Empire (California) articles into the Greater Los Angeles Area article is going on at
460:
I preface my comment with the fact that I'm not a member of WikiProject Southern California, nor have I worked on many articles in its scope. I support this merge. Consolidating efforts seems like a plus at this point.
1514:
As long as WP:MX doesn't become a parent wikiproject of this task force, I don't see a problem with it. However, I think WP:MX may not enjoy having WP:CA tags on articles that they believe would be solely under their
630: 21: 1348:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1176: 252:, which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the 1500:
I not proposing we create a new task force. I'm proposing that we expand the scope of this one, because I have the same concern about having enough participants for two separate task forces.
529: 159: 1756:
is a new type of article at WP:FAC so I hope a lot of Dodger fans and baseball/sports fans in general will take the time to shape it correctly as a model for future articles on records.--
1350: 909: 840:
and add your thoughts on the following two questions. Even if you don't want to read the whole discussion, your response to the following questions would be helpful.
188: 1382: 770: 754: 810:
To me the pictures look better as thumbs rather than having them being posted there. Now if you though the pictures were to small, we can make them bigger correct?
1293: 245: 260:
to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Knowledge:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at
1794: 1753: 1321: 1232: 975: 1810: 1783: 1735: 1710: 1690: 1665: 1639: 1593: 1552: 1538: 1524: 1509: 1495: 1481: 1463: 1448: 1429: 1371: 1333: 1305: 1277: 1246: 1222: 1207: 1188: 1158: 1135: 1108: 1077: 1054: 1031: 1003: 964: 894: 860: 826: 785: 743: 711: 695: 669: 646: 616: 593: 559: 517: 502: 483: 470: 453: 434: 418: 317: 148: 77: 48: 878: 395: 353: 1622: 328: 1486:
I don't have anything against the idea, my primary concern is whether there will be sufficient active participants to sustain a new task force.--
508:
I've now moved the project page to a sub-page of WP:CAL, and redesigned the project page while I was going through the various SoCal sub-pages. -
444:
California, but if there isn't anyone using the SOCAL talk page or other facilities there's no real benefit to having an unwatched/unread page. -
1529:
I am totally opposed. This is just throwing a Big Brother insult in the faces of our Mexican friends. We don't need another dustup as in 1845.
1096: 799:
I (dont know about other users) could not even read the things he had w/his poor pictures, they blocked the words! I changed them to "thumbs")
837: 815: 17: 1344: 905: 769:
will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the
1548: 1505: 1459: 1425: 1355: 1092: 144:
I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! -
1420:
is on both sides of the border. The topics of (the inhabited bit of) Baja and Southern California are pretty havaly integrated anyway.
1766: 1611: 1604: 735: 542: 249: 241: 1406: 983: 727: 546: 368: 65: 870: 382: 343: 332: 214: 1806: 1731: 1581: 1544: 1501: 1455: 1421: 1410: 692: 336: 327:
I think this project should be switched to a task force, at least in the template sense of the word. I've been going through
286: 218: 1381:
Scene Baja California doesn't have it's own project, any objections to tacking it on to this project, at least for now, per
1795:
Knowledge:Files_for_deletion/2014_March_30#File:2014.03.29.torso.sculpture.at.rodeo.dr.and.dayton.way.beverly.hills.CA.jpg
1120: 1088: 723: 261: 61: 55: 1589: 1520: 1491: 1477: 1444: 1329: 1301: 1273: 1203: 1184: 1154: 1099:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. -- 1653: 1646: 1265: 1121:
Talk:Greater Los Angeles Area#Merge Los Angeles metropolitan area and Inland Empire (California) into this article?
954: 938: 929: 577: 305: 103:
All WikiProjects are invited to have their "milestone-reached" announcements automatically placed onto Knowledge's
213:
subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering
1802: 1798: 1727: 1720: 1124: 1018: 1013:
I am aware that this issue was decided back in 2006, HOWEVER, I would like to bring up the possibility of having
681: 581: 1621:
Further suggestions for additional secondary sources would be most appreciated, at the article's talk page, at
856: 304:
Kindly look at the above article, and join the discussion on moving the History section to its own article, at
230: 226: 204: 195: 1439:
would have a say about that. Perhaps a task force regarding Baja California maybe better hosted under them?--
874: 634: 121:
No work need be done by the project themselves; they just need to provide some details when they sign up. A
1227:
The list has a section with a header for inactive. I moved them there last time I did a cleanup, then used
1762: 1671: 1585: 1516: 1487: 1473: 1440: 1325: 1297: 1269: 1199: 1180: 1150: 538: 1417: 401:
with a corresponding WP Cal template usage, and bot-assisted assessment where one doesn't already exist.
359:
banner. Based on the overlap in templates, and what appears to be a lack of general activity in both the
1686: 1534: 1218: 1073: 1048: 1027: 991: 738: 642: 612: 466: 313: 298: 222: 73: 44: 803:
largest metropolitan areas, where which city is located in the mega-region we call Southern California.
765:
will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's
1706: 1198:
Should we remove inactive members, or place them into a sub-list? Say haven't edited in 12 months? --
946: 573: 566: 388:, which take arguments for if it is part of WikiProject Southern California and if so, what priority. 95: 1179:. I wasn't aware of this until I saw the wikipedia page. Take a gander and weigh in your opinion. -- 1242: 1104: 852: 822: 707: 607:
cover Los Angeles and Orange counties, since there is a Los Angeles task force for those counties?
513: 498: 449: 414: 1472:
I will invite participants of WP:MX, see if you would like to have a joint task force with WP:CA--
916:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the 1661: 1065: 1038: 999: 663: 589: 480: 406: 36: 816:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject California#Cities vs Regions in Portal:Southern California Cities Top
1543:
What Big Brother insult, and what does an 1845 dustup have to do with wikiproject origination?
795:
I am suggesting that Portal:Southern California/Cities be changed to my older version because:
1774: 1757: 1469: 1365: 961: 941:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th. 550: 533: 430: 179: 1778: 1682: 1530: 1214: 1069: 1043: 1023: 888: 731: 638: 608: 462: 309: 273: 69: 40: 1702: 762: 364: 847:
2) Are you interested in working collaboratively, or do you prefer to do your own thing?
844:
1) Should the Inland Empire Task Force be merged with the Southern California Task Force?
1750:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Orel Hershiser's scoreless innings streak/archive1
1770: 1678: 1635: 1402: 1238: 1100: 1095:. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments 937:
and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at
818: 703: 623: 554: 509: 494: 445: 410: 291: 210: 145: 1742: 1657: 1228: 1146: 1061: 1014: 995: 780: 655: 585: 476: 360: 281: 272:
to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome
122: 104: 405:
I would also suggest also merging the membership lists, holding most discussions on
1436: 1359: 1163: 426: 169: 130: 115: 111: 934: 64:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
1716: 1114:
Merge discussion involving Greater Los Angeles Area metropolitan area articles..
883: 269: 489:
It's been just under a week, so I've requested the replacement of the template
987: 900:
Southern California articles have been selected for the Knowledge 0.8 release
475:
I would concur with the merge also given that there is no real activity here.
1630: 979: 917: 877:
status and only requires a few tweaks to pass. Please check out the review
1571:
First San Diego Comic-Con International meetup location renewed discussion
1394: 1390: 974:
For those interested in San Diego: there is a discussion now going on at
776: 1322:
Talk:San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station#Anti-nuclear protests section
753:
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the
1386: 633:. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at 367:
projects I think this project should be converted into a task force of
1398: 908:
for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were
637:. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. 629:
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the
1235:
on the user talk pages. That was when I was doing the project-: -->
1599:
Quality improvement project for Chris Field (Los Angeles musician)
953:
to extend the reach of Knowledge worldwide. Please help us, with
904:
Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge articles selected by the
734:, all of which are pages in this taskforce. For information, go 1177:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Surfing Madonna (2nd nomination)
950: 339:
are showing as unassessed even if they are assessed within the
933:
with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's
306:
Talk:Inglewood,_California#Move_history_to_its_own_article.3F
187:
on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at
1294:
Talk:Morse High School (San Diego, California)#IAR Petition
925:
Southern California articles and revisionIDs we have chosen
530:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Rob Pelinka/archive1ā€Ž
308:. Other additions and comments are also sought. Sincerely, 131:
Click here for more information or to sign your project up.
978:
about the style of naming to be used for neighborhoods of
791:
Cities vs Regions in Portal:Southern California/Cities/Top
603:
Why not set the Southern California task force so that it
1654:
Talk:History of California#Dublin IP editor contributions
1064:, I figured it would be easiest to discuss the matter at 910:
selected based on their assessed importance and quality
1615: 490: 66:
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
1726:
Some eyes on here would be nice; student assignment.ā€”
1345:
Category:Television series set in Van Nuys, California
1339:
Category:Television series set in Van Nuys, California
1041:, which is probably the best place to discuss this. 986:; two proposals under discussion would change it to 702:
and tag them as deprecated unless someone objects. -
1233:
Knowledge:WikiProject_California/Templates#Rollcall
1087:An article that you have been involved in editing, 1416:Also the Southern California metropolitan area of 1213:Yes. Remove. But notify on their talk page first. 1789:Neutral notification of image deletion discussion 836:Task Force members: Please review the discussion 323:Changing to task force of WikiProject California 158:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new 1696:Museum Looking for GLAM Contacts in Los Angeles 248:. We are also in the process of implementing a 35:After being subjected to a massive face-lift, 881:and improve the article if possible. Thanks! 8: 1656:. Additional input would be appreciated. -- 832:Any opinions on Merge and/or Collaboration? 572:There is a current merge proposal to merge 1580:You are invited to join the discussion at 1320:You are invited to join the discussion at 1292:You are invited to join the discussion at 1264:You are invited to join the discussion at 1145:You are invited to join the discussion at 976:Talk:Allied Gardens, San Diego, California 1754:Orel Hershiser's scoreless innings streak 1397:tough that's south of the 15 mile strip, 1652:A significant discussion is underway at 1255:Reversion of article name change request 39:is ready to meet her public. Sincerely, 1623:Talk:Chris Field (Los Angeles musician) 1582:Knowledge talk:Meetup/LA/SDCC1#Location 923:We would like to ask you to review the 378:Using the recently added parameters to 329:Category:Unassessed California articles 201:This is a notice to let you know about 160:WikiProject coordinators' working group 110:Milestones could include the number of 960:For the Knowledge 1.0 editorial team, 814:The main discussion is going on here: 680:Is the to-do list even being updated? 391:Using a bot to replace all usages of 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject California 7: 722:There is a merge proposal involving 1470:WP:CANVASS#Appropriate notification 1266:Talk:AdriĆ”n GonzĆ”lez#Requested move 118:or articles covered by the project. 1612:Chris Field (Los Angeles musician) 1605:Chris Field (Los Angeles musician) 28: 1701:the L.A. area please contact me. 1407:Municipalities of Baja California 984:Point Loma, San Diego, California 970:Naming of San Diego neighborhoods 728:Olinda, Orange County, California 331:, and noticed that articles like 236:If you are already subscribed to 62:Template:San Diego transit topics 56:Template:San Diego transit topics 1575: 1315: 1287: 1259: 1060:I have placed a move request on 94: 871:Metrolink (Southern California) 866:Metrolink (Southern California) 396:WikiProject Southern California 354:WikiProject Southern California 333:Talk:Imperial Beach, California 1797:regarding an image used here: 1411:List of Baja California cities 965:23:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 617:03:16, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 337:Talk:Monterey Park, California 294:} 09:42, 15 March, 2009 (UTC) 22:Southern California task force 1: 1679:Talk:Hollywood#Requested_move 1553:16:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 1539:15:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 1525:19:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC) 1283:Morse High School Alumni List 1147:WP:RSN#sandiegostreetcars.org 1089:County Route S18 (California) 1083:County Route S18 (California) 861:18:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 724:Brea-Olinda, Brea, California 670:00:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC) 647:20:33, 21 November 2009 (UTC) 262:Knowledge talk:Article alerts 189:06:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 125:will do all of the hard work. 1510:19:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 1496:18:47, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 1482:18:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 1464:14:24, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 1449:23:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 1430:22:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 1372:12:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 1194:task force participants list 1109:00:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC) 1004:16:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC) 994:(the alternate proposal). -- 827:21:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 786:03:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 744:23:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 712:07:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC) 153: 149:22:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 78:18:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 49:02:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 1711:17:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC) 1610:I've rewritten the article 1078:08:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 1055:07:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 1032:06:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC) 955:your WikiProject's feedback 696:03:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 154:Coordinators' working group 1826: 1811:14:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 1784:14:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC) 1677:Please note discussion at 1647:Talk:History of California 1334:17:46, 6 August 2012 (UTC) 1159:01:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC) 990:(the primary proposal) or 982:. Currently that style is 939:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 935:articles with cleanup tags 930:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 759:Saturday, January 23, 2010 578:Interstate 5 in California 454:23:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 435:08:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 419:08:34, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 318:07:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 1799:Rodeo Drive Walk of Style 1736:20:57, 6 March 2014 (UTC) 1721:Rodeo Drive Walk of Style 1666:18:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 1640:02:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC) 1545:Emmette Hernandez Coleman 1502:Emmette Hernandez Coleman 1456:Emmette Hernandez Coleman 1422:Emmette Hernandez Coleman 1356:Categories for discussion 1311:Content weight discussion 1278:18:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC) 1247:05:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1223:02:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC) 1208:23:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1189:03:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC) 1136:02:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC) 1093:good article reassessment 1091:has been nominated for a 1019:Orange County, California 895:11:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC) 599:Idea regarding task force 594:06:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 369:WP:WikiProject California 256:parameter, but forget to 1793:It's taking place here: 1691:21:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC) 1594:06:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC) 1306:18:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 755:WP 1.0 assessment system 560:22:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC) 518:08:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC) 1741:New type of article at 1009:Orange County redirect? 771:WP 1.0 project homepage 749:WP 1.0 bot announcement 635:Talk:Rancho Camulos/GA1 503:03:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 484:05:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 471:05:28, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 83:Milestone Announcements 1672:Hollywood, Los Angeles 873:is being reviewed for 383:WikiProject California 344:WikiProject California 240:, it is now easier to 1141:Reliability of source 992:Point Loma, San Diego 951:Knowledge for Schools 349:because they use the 299:Inglewood, California 225:and other workflows ( 215:Articles for deletion 1803:alf laylah wa laylah 1728:alf laylah wa laylah 1351:the category's entry 947:One Laptop per Child 574:Golden State Freeway 567:Golden State Freeway 374:This would involve 246:request new features 219:Requests for comment 1435:I would image that 1171:Surfing Madonna AfD 622:GA reassessment of 1437:WikiProject Mexico 1066:Talk:Orange County 1039:Talk:Orange County 906:Knowledge 1.0 team 565:Merge proposal of 528:Please comment at 105:announcements page 54:TfD nomination of 37:Gorman, California 31:Gorman, California 1782: 1586:RightCowLeftCoast 1517:RightCowLeftCoast 1488:RightCowLeftCoast 1474:RightCowLeftCoast 1441:RightCowLeftCoast 1418:San Diegoā€“Tijuana 1358:page. Thank you. 1326:RightCowLeftCoast 1298:RightCowLeftCoast 1270:RightCowLeftCoast 1200:RightCowLeftCoast 1181:RightCowLeftCoast 1167: 1151:RightCowLeftCoast 784: 667: 631:GA Sweeps process 558: 482: 277: 191: 185: 142: 141: 138: 137: 1817: 1760: 1645:Input needed at 1579: 1578: 1368: 1362: 1319: 1318: 1291: 1290: 1263: 1262: 1161: 1133: 1129: 1051: 1046: 1037:I've replied at 891: 886: 774: 741: 740:Purplebackpack89 732:Brea, California 690: 687: 684: 668: 661: 658: 536: 479: 400: 394: 387: 381: 358: 352: 348: 342: 268:Message sent by 267: 255: 182: 177: 174: 167: 98: 91: 90: 87: 86: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1791: 1746: 1724: 1698: 1675: 1650: 1601: 1576: 1573: 1383:this discussion 1379: 1377:Baja California 1366: 1360: 1341: 1316: 1313: 1288: 1285: 1260: 1257: 1196: 1173: 1143: 1130: 1125: 1116: 1085: 1049: 1044: 1011: 972: 912:, then article 902: 889: 884: 868: 834: 793: 751: 739: 720: 688: 685: 682: 678: 656: 653: 627: 601: 582:discussion here 570: 526: 524:Rob Pelinka FAC 398: 392: 385: 379: 356: 350: 346: 340: 325: 302: 289: 253: 211:fully-automated 199: 180: 170: 156: 134: 85: 59: 33: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 1823: 1821: 1790: 1787: 1745: 1739: 1723: 1714: 1697: 1694: 1674: 1669: 1649: 1643: 1608: 1607: 1600: 1597: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1484: 1403:Rosarito Beach 1378: 1375: 1340: 1337: 1312: 1309: 1284: 1281: 1256: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1195: 1192: 1172: 1169: 1142: 1139: 1115: 1112: 1084: 1081: 1058: 1057: 1010: 1007: 971: 968: 901: 898: 867: 864: 853:MissionInn.Jim 849: 848: 845: 833: 830: 812: 811: 808: 804: 800: 792: 789: 750: 747: 719: 718:Merge proposal 716: 715: 714: 677: 674: 673: 672: 626: 624:Rancho Camulos 620: 600: 597: 569: 563: 525: 522: 521: 520: 487: 486: 473: 458: 457: 456: 438: 437: 403: 402: 389: 324: 321: 301: 296: 285: 238:Article Alerts 205:Article alerts 198: 196:Article alerts 193: 168:Delievered by 155: 152: 140: 139: 136: 135: 128: 127: 126: 119: 108: 99: 84: 81: 58: 52: 32: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1822: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1788: 1786: 1785: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1748:Please visit 1744: 1740: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1722: 1718: 1715: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1695: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1648: 1644: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1632: 1626: 1624: 1619: 1617: 1613: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1598: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1570: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1414: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1376: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1363: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1347: 1346: 1338: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1310: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1282: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1254: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1193: 1191: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1140: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1122: 1113: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1082: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062:Orange County 1056: 1053: 1052: 1047: 1040: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1020: 1016: 1015:Orange County 1008: 1006: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 969: 967: 966: 963: 958: 956: 952: 948: 942: 940: 936: 932: 931: 926: 921: 919: 915: 911: 907: 899: 897: 896: 893: 892: 887: 880: 876: 872: 865: 863: 862: 858: 854: 846: 843: 842: 841: 839: 831: 829: 828: 824: 820: 817: 809: 805: 801: 798: 797: 796: 790: 788: 787: 782: 778: 772: 768: 767:summary table 764: 760: 756: 748: 746: 745: 742: 737: 733: 729: 725: 717: 713: 709: 705: 700: 699: 698: 697: 694: 691: 675: 671: 665: 660: 659: 651: 650: 649: 648: 644: 640: 636: 632: 625: 621: 619: 618: 614: 610: 606: 598: 596: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 575: 568: 564: 562: 561: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 535: 531: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 506: 505: 504: 500: 496: 492: 485: 481: 478: 474: 472: 468: 464: 459: 455: 451: 447: 442: 441: 440: 439: 436: 432: 428: 423: 422: 421: 420: 416: 412: 408: 397: 390: 384: 377: 376: 375: 372: 370: 366: 362: 355: 345: 338: 334: 330: 322: 320: 319: 315: 311: 307: 300: 297: 295: 293: 288: 283: 278: 275: 271: 265: 263: 259: 251: 250:"news system" 247: 243: 239: 234: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 207: 206: 197: 194: 192: 190: 186: 183: 175: 173: 163: 161: 151: 150: 147: 133: 132: 124: 120: 117: 113: 109: 106: 102: 101: 100: 97: 93: 92: 89: 88: 82: 80: 79: 75: 71: 68:. Thank you. 67: 63: 57: 53: 51: 50: 46: 42: 38: 30: 23: 19: 1792: 1758:TonyTheTiger 1747: 1725: 1699: 1676: 1651: 1629: 1627: 1620: 1609: 1574: 1415: 1380: 1349: 1343: 1342: 1314: 1286: 1258: 1197: 1174: 1144: 1131: 1127:08OceanBeach 1126: 1117: 1086: 1059: 1042: 1017:redirect to 1012: 973: 962:SelectionBot 959: 943: 928: 922: 913: 903: 882: 875:Good Article 869: 851:Thank you. 850: 835: 813: 794: 758: 752: 721: 679: 654: 628: 604: 602: 571: 534:TonyTheTiger 527: 488: 404: 373: 326: 303: 279: 266: 257: 254:display=none 237: 235: 203: 202: 200: 176: 171: 164: 157: 143: 129: 60: 34: 1717:Rodeo Drive 1683:GeorgeLouis 1531:GeorgeLouis 1405:, see also 1215:GeorgeLouis 1175:Please see 1070:CASportsFan 1045:Will Beback 1024:CASportsFan 920:algorithm. 807:so it self. 639:Jezhotwells 609:WhisperToMe 463:Killiondude 310:GeorgeLouis 270:User:Addbot 258:give a link 242:report bugs 223:Peer review 70:Hawaiian717 41:GeorgeLouis 1775:WP:CHICAGO 1703:OR drohowa 988:Point Loma 763:WP 1.0 bot 676:To-Do list 551:WP:CHICAGO 292:WP Physics 280:Thanks. ā€” 1779:WP:WAWARD 1239:Optigan13 1231:to leave 1162:(Using {{ 1101:Admrboltz 980:San Diego 918:WikiTrust 819:House1090 773:. ā€”Ā Carl 704:Optigan13 510:Optigan13 495:Optigan13 446:Optigan13 411:Optigan13 227:full list 146:Jarry1250 1658:MelanieN 1515:scope.-- 1395:Ensenada 1391:Mexicali 1237:to it. - 996:MelanieN 914:versions 689:Enforcer 686:Phoenix 657:howcheng 605:does not 586:Oakshade 477:Amerique 365:WP:SOCAL 287:ĪŗĪæĪ½Ļ„ĻĪ¹Ī²Ļ‚ 282:Headbomb 20:‎ | 1771:WP:FOUR 1387:Tijuana 1361:szyslak 1354:on the 580:. See 555:WP:LOTM 427:doncram 181:Disable 172:Ā§hepBot 1743:WP:FAC 1401:, and 1399:Tecate 1229:WP:AWB 890:(talk) 885:Butros 761:, the 730:, and 693:(talk) 652:Done. 407:WT:CAL 361:WP:CAL 757:. On 576:into 16:< 1807:talk 1732:talk 1719:and 1707:talk 1687:talk 1662:talk 1636:talk 1631:Cirt 1616:DIFF 1590:talk 1549:talk 1535:talk 1521:talk 1506:talk 1492:talk 1478:talk 1468:Per 1460:talk 1445:talk 1426:talk 1413:). 1409:and 1330:talk 1302:talk 1274:talk 1243:talk 1219:talk 1204:talk 1185:talk 1155:talk 1105:talk 1097:here 1074:talk 1068:. -- 1050:talk 1028:talk 1000:talk 949:and 879:here 857:talk 838:here 823:talk 781:talk 736:here 708:talk 683:The 664:chat 643:talk 613:talk 590:talk 514:talk 499:talk 491:diff 467:talk 450:talk 431:talk 415:talk 363:and 335:and 314:talk 274:here 244:and 231:here 209:, a 74:talk 45:talk 1801:.ā€” 1618:. 1584:. 1324:. 1296:. 1268:. 1166:}}) 1164:pls 1149:. 957:! 777:CBM 547:bio 532:.-- 493:. - 371:. 123:bot 116:GAs 112:FAs 1809:) 1777:/ 1773:/ 1769:/ 1765:/ 1752:. 1734:) 1709:) 1689:) 1681:. 1664:) 1638:) 1628:ā€” 1625:. 1614:, 1592:) 1551:) 1537:) 1523:) 1508:) 1494:) 1480:) 1462:) 1447:) 1428:) 1393:, 1389:, 1370:) 1332:) 1304:) 1276:) 1245:) 1221:) 1206:) 1187:) 1157:) 1123:. 1107:) 1076:) 1030:) 1002:) 859:) 825:) 779:Ā· 726:, 710:) 645:) 615:) 592:) 584:-- 557:) 516:) 501:) 469:) 452:) 433:) 417:) 399:}} 393:{{ 386:}} 380:{{ 357:}} 351:{{ 347:}} 341:{{ 316:) 290:ā€“ 264:. 233:. 221:, 217:, 114:, 76:) 47:) 1805:( 1781:) 1767:C 1763:T 1761:( 1730:( 1705:( 1685:( 1660:( 1634:( 1588:( 1547:( 1533:( 1519:( 1504:( 1490:( 1476:( 1458:( 1443:( 1424:( 1367:t 1364:( 1328:( 1300:( 1272:( 1241:( 1217:( 1202:( 1183:( 1153:( 1103:( 1072:( 1026:( 998:( 855:( 821:( 783:) 775:( 706:( 666:} 662:{ 641:( 611:( 588:( 553:/ 549:/ 545:/ 543:c 541:/ 539:t 537:( 512:( 497:( 465:( 448:( 429:( 413:( 312:( 284:{ 276:. 184:) 178:( 107:. 72:( 43:(

Index

Knowledge talk:WikiProject California
Southern California task force
Gorman, California
GeorgeLouis
talk
02:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Template:San Diego transit topics
Template:San Diego transit topics
the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page
Hawaiian717
talk
18:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Announcements
announcements page
FAs
GAs
bot
Click here for more information or to sign your project up.
Jarry1250
22:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject coordinators' working group
Ā§hepBot
Disable
06:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Article alerts
Article alerts
fully-automated
Articles for deletion
Requests for comment
Peer review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘