Knowledge talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine/Archive 7

414:

return to prepubertal levels and spontaneous fertility is close to zero. It occurs over a few years, a short enough time that abrupt hormone withdrawal symptoms are common. Andropause, on the other hand, is a relative decrease to lower hormonal levels which occurs over decades. The hormone levels may decrease by 30-70% between the ages of 45 and 75 years, but sperm production falls by less, and both testosterone and sperm production are maintained well above prepubertal levels. Abrupt hormone withdrawal symptoms are uncommon and fertility is often maintained even into one's 80s. The concept of andropause appeals to those who think aging is a treatable disease. We have certainly learned that one cannot simply keep a woman on estrogen to age 90 without incurring some shift of risks. We are going to find out the same thing about giving testosterone to aging men. And, yes, the concept is partly a product of pharmaceutical marketing. For the last several years the annual scientific meetings of the Endocrine Society have included structured debates about the concept and the pros and cons of testosterone treatment of aging.

235:), and I'm struggling a bit. I'd appreciate if any of you who have the time or desire could take a look. In addition to general comments and fixes, there are a few specific requests I have. First, please correct any inaccuracies or misleading statements. Second, how detailed should I make the "Uses" section? Should I describe the specific lesions that are stented? Specific trials? Third, help with the "tone" of the article, and properly balancing benefits and controversy would be appreciated. Fourth, what else can I do to expand or improve it? I can add technical details, but I'm not sure how beneficial they are in an encyclopedia article. I'd like to nominate it for peer review at some point, but it should probably be longer and I really would appreciate some medical feedback first. It would make a good topic for featured article, no? We've had plenty of featured articles on diseases and anatomic structures; how about an intervention/device for a change? — 2535:

infection & irritation could be treated with homeopathy and had deferred seeking "conventional" advice for fear that "drugs" might be advised. The child had cellulitis and now was critically ill, entering septic shock and needed blue-light ambulance admission for high-dose intravenous antibiotics if life was to be saved. The mother seriously started to question my judgement that antibiotics were indicated stating that it was proven that homeopathy could treat infections, and was quite taken aback that I refused to interrupt my telephone call to ambulance control instead of discussing the merits of the various additional homeopathic preparations she was considering using. Yes homeopathy exists, yes some hold that it may help for some conditions and NPOV requires mention in an encyclopaedia - but in a textbook of Medicine discussing aetiology, signs, symptoms, treatment and prognosis of disease ?

1604:. I get the feeling that "educational use only" images are not welcome. I find AED's US "opt out" clause rather discomforting. In the UK, there are "opt in" forms that give rights for the doctors to use images/video for eductational purposes only (such as slides at a presentation) - though I've only occasionally seen one. (I'm sure the UK wikidocs could say more on this). Personally, I would be upset if the x-ray of my broken toe appeared on the Internet for all to download, even if it was anonymous. If my permission had been sought first, then I'd feel happier. I know its not rational, but it just seems polite. 1660:

at my hospital, and they have a disclaimer form for the patient and physician to sign that says that the image being taken (or burnt from PACS onto CD, etc.) is no longer property of the patient or hospital, and can be used "for general use at the discretion of _________" where the physician fills in their name. It sounds like a public domain type licensing form, and I think that's probably the best way to go for X-rays. It's a little time consuming but I just get my patients to sign a similar form whenever I see an interesting finding on endoscopy (sort of like X-ray, I guess) --

1314:

HAES paradigm is based on sound or shaky evidence, but whether (a) HAES is enough of a concept to have an entry in Knowledge, and (b) whether the article is taking that descriptive NPOV angle rather than a POV. I think (a) is definitely the case, because the term is used in literature from a variety of sources. As for (b), so far it is describing beliefs and listing some references to people/sites/literature and thus I think it is NPOV at the moment. I'd agree with being careful that it continues to be NPOV and doesn't go anywhere near advocacy - PurpleRavel, 22 August 2006

765:? However, I'm still opposed to moving this away from articles too much. It's of course more easy to put it in a separate article not having to watch it, not having to clean it up,... But I think this is part of the charm of Knowledge as opposed to standard encyclopedia's, that it has non-standard but nonetheless interesting information. Splitting it off feels to me as a form of elitism. It should be referenced, though. Can't wait to find out which people are famous for their eyebrows!-- 1634:

from the photo (e.g. photo of a cold sore on a lip does not show rest of patient's face). This is no different really from use of “model release forms” for images used in newspapers/magazines/TV. However aside from any civil claims for wrongdoing, any UK doctor posting an image of their patient without consent would be breaching "Good clinical practice" guidelines of the [[General Medical Council" and could expect to face professional disciplinary proceedings (i.e. double jeopardy).

3900: 31: 3114: 2722: 2293: 2235: 2199: 2168: 2001: 1957: 3154:"practice track," while once sufficient, is no longer enough to make one a competant Emergency Physician. Those who have taken and passed the BCEM because they were no ABEM eligible clearly disagree. Florida allows the BCEM by statute, North Caroline rejects it and there is a fight among individual hospitals about whether they will accept BCEM as equivalent to ABEM for "Board Certification in Emergency Medicine. 2645:

but giving the students assignments and feedback -that's learning by doing. Currently, the main activities for students would be to write pages for the School. It could be reading and writing articles on Knowledge (providing an improvement drive for this project), and then doing a self-assesment test on Wikiversity, or getting feedback from some kind of mentor that follows your edits here.

2122:, relying on a number of key papers and generally finding material to close the gaps. This is a common condition that is still underdiagnosed in most countries, but it is a fertile area of research, and there has been a major paradigm shift over the last ten years or so. I've refactored some poorly sourced, unencyclopedic or redundant stuff, and standardised the citation system. 2566:

versions, but as this is the "University" you'd think that there might be more of a vetting process. Plus, there is already a reasonable "Emergency Medicine" topic on the regular Knowledge. I haven't yet bothered to read much else besides "Cardiology," but it seem to have a lot to do with the heart and very little to do with the practice of Cardiology.

1004:

whether this is a genuine movement in US &/or accepted use of term, i thought I might wait a few hours to see what other (American) editors might guide me on all of this.... but re-reading the article, each section is POV and one one I suspect majority would not wholeheartedly agree with - ok then... remove copyvio and use db-copyvio tag instead.

1374:, and I really think the stubs category is far too big. Aren't all wiki articles stubs? An edit tab is at the top of just about every page on wikipedia. Isn't that enough to prompt input from someone who knows what they're talking about? So, if an article seems to be complete or not likely to expand, you'll excuse me for deleting the stub templates. 1233:

a "criticism of the dominant opinion", it's a set of beliefs that some people use to guide their eating and exercise habits -- I understand that the article needs to be expanded to explain why it's not just a criticism of the dominant beliefs. But I really fail to see why someone would think it's not a valid wikipedia article -- after all, the

1046:, who is the Director of Communications for the organisation whose self-penned material was copied directly across to wikipedia and repeatedly linked to (I've pointed out issues of writing about ones own organisation and suggested they discuss here the topic, for other editors to then decide if notable or not, and independantly write-up): 1238:

the page ... it's a stub, I haven't gotten to it yet. If someone wants to add a "Criticisms of HAES" section, that would be welcomed! My impetus for starting this page was, quite simply, that when people ask me to explain what HAES is I would like to be able to point them to a good, NPOV, wikipedia article about the topic.

1050:

recognise. In other words it starts with the general accepted understanding of the term and then takes it forward as a campaigning political movement. This is likely to be seen as biased Point of View and wikipedia demands WP:Neutral point of view. Is there some other article title that may be used, e.g.

3737: 2455: 1659:

I'm not too sure of the specifics of the law myself, but the medical photography department at my hospital deals with this issue routinely for X-rays or photos for publication (where patients and the hospital both have to give up rights to a photograph that is to be published). I spoke to the people

1232:

I wrote the HAES article (well, stub, but more is coming), and I'd like to understand why people think it's a vanity article. I strongly disagree. It's a real topic--cf Linda Bacon's study of the effects of the HAES approach, the HAES journal, the Green Mountain at Fox Run program, etc. It's not just

3001:

I think the group is worthy of an entry, but the way the article is written is nauseatingly self-congratulatory and more like an advertisement than an encyclopedic article. Also, since it is a Canadian private for-profit health care provider, it is a sort of odd ball. This status, I think, deserves

1501:

I know this may end up being an institution/America specific question, but I was wondering what people knew/thought about obtaining permission, etc. before releasing radiologic studies (with all identifying information removed!) into the public domain. I could contribute a ton of x-rays, but haven't

1366:

Symptoms: I would abandon categorizing articles under Symptoms for being literally equal to Pathology, but then I would be left with no distinction for an article that was under neuroscience, but described a disease that should be under Neurology as it was orijinally distinguished from NeuroScience.

1350:

I got into this subject from wondering what the difference between Neurology and Neuroscience was, and I concluded that there isn't a very big one, nor is it a distinction that pervades European language. It's not in Czech, German, or Polish. One is a research discipline. The other tends to refer to

1022:

This is pretty interesting. I'm not sure that I've heard this collection of recommendations, etc. referred to as "medical professionalism," but I am sure that the movement has some name. The concepts are all quite familiar, I'm sure. Obviously it's a copyvio, but I believe it probably has some merit

1003:

Thanks. However it is only the article's intro for which I was quickly able to find as being lifted, the text in the various sections are seem similar formal linguistic style and markup tags suggests similar copy & paste from site, but I can not immediately locate on that website. As I am unsure

3020:

I have kept some track of where LASIK is going, and this group has been gunning for mileage and has been heavily advertising in the media. The article has been obviously written by a PR employee of the company, given the copy-paste going on from the website. Quoting WP:CORP - Note 1: Self-promotion

2508:

I fear its usefulness will be as limited as a primary source of information as for wikipedia itself. Hence wikipedia is useful as an initial introduction to a topic, but no one should rely solely upon it without seeking other sources (yet if wikiversity of Medicine is to be for developing countries

2644:

I haven't quite figured it out yet myself, I think it will become clear once the project gains enough critical mass to become more active. But, what I can envision, is that it could be a place to bring together people wanting to learn and people wanting to teach. But not teaching in a classic way,

2534:

Real life example (if homeopaths were to add instruction on "hard" medical topics - i.e. treatment of heart attacks or cellulitis rather than IBS or chronic pain perception) - I was asked to see a child in their home who was "unwell", it turned out that the mother had a belief that the "mild" skin

1633:

My understanding of UK situation is that no information or image of a patient may be used without their express consent for such a use. Any such image used in a UK publication would need a prior signed consent form granting such a use and generally also that the patient's identity is fully removed

1545:

I dunno, a law that I don't know about that could end my professional career? The whole copyright thing is a question I had, too. Since the patients technically own their x-rays in America, am I violating their implicit copyright by publishing the image? I've asked over at the Commons. There are a

1411:

As previously stated (can't remember which talk page it was), neurosciences is the underlying sciences and study including normal functioning (e.g. Sodium-potassium channels, neuroembryology, characteristics of neuronal depolarisation etc). Whilst "neurology" deals with pathology true, this misses

1313:

A political party has a POV, but it's possible to write a NPOV article about it, like when it was established, who are prominent figures in the party, what common values do members of the party have, etc. etc. I think the same should go for a HAES article. So the question shouldn't be whether the

1237:

deserves a page, why shouldn't HAES? It is no less valid than that one. I am also completely mystified as to what on the current stub of a page could be considered to be POV: there are about ten sentences so far, and they are all simply factual...? If the issue is that there is no criticism yet on

782:

I will support you moving it off. I don't think that it's elitism to use summary style - moving a long list in an article of prose to a "list" designed for the purpose just makes sense. Linking to the list in See also ensures that the list is an extension of the article. It's a perfect use of both

494:

A consensus emerged and no new postings in the last week, so I've implemented across the templates. Some had just a couple of classes per template but with many drugs listed (seemed best highlighting the class-names in their own columns), whilst other templates had multiple classes each with a few

413:

The concept is not entirely bogus, but is often exaggerated to the point of quackery. The principal differences between menopause and andropause are that menopause is a complete cessation of ovarian function, both hormonal and reproductive. By the end of menopause many of the reproductive hormones

3300:

what he has stated on his website, he claims to have "received the highest honors in medical school", to have "established one of the most successful ophthalmology practices in the country", and to have "taught the latest in surgical techniques to other physicians across the country". There is no

2512:

If campaigners over a topic wish to skew a topic with alternative opinions, will the same NPOV policy as wikipedia require equal coverage of ideas and practices? If so then this may be stupid, dangerous or both. Knowledge has NPOV over stated opinions, yet in instructional material one needs SPOV

1563:

In most US jurisdictions, the physician/hospital owns the medical records/radiographs but the patients are entitled to copies of them (for a fee) if they so request. I am not 100% certain but I think radiographs can be used for educational purposes provided 1) the identifying information has been

3153:

There are two competing board certifications ABEM and BCEM. The major difference is that ABEM certifies physicians who are residency trained in Emergency Medicine, while BCEM will certify those who have followed a practice track. Many who are residency trained in Emergency Medicine feel that the

1065:

Again I agree the conflict of interests (doctor's self interests, doctor's concerns for their individual patients, healthcare systems to their target population, administrators concerns for meeting measureable but clinically dubious targets, heathcare systems to their paymasters etc etc) is both

2565:

I'm curious where the seed content is coming from. I read the article on Emergency Medicine. Not only is it quite inaccurate, especially for US practice, but it is rather insulting in places to those who are residency trained in EM. I know that some inaccuracy is to be expected for the initial

1358:

Pathology: Any condition for which there is a laboratory test or medical imaging to confirm or deny a diagnosis. In rural areas, I'm left to believe that G.P.s often interpret lab results. This category is the main difference between Neuroscience and Neurology. IOW, if an article is about both

1049:

Many of the issues raised are of course interesting and important. However your definition of the term "medical professionalism", with implications as a backlash against forced management of healthcare organisations, is certainly not the rather narrower meaning I or any UK doctor I know would

498:

Finally all the drug navigation templates are under a general 'Category:Science navigational boxes', I think these should be moved to a subcategory of 'Drugs navigation boxes'. I know that not all are drugs (eg BirthControl template) but neither are all used for clinical therapy (eg many of

1645:

and held on their behalf by a hospital or doctor. As such, a patient can not demand to take their notes from an NHS provider in order to keep or destroy, but has under the Data protection act (and other instruments of regulation) the right to view the notes and have any objection about any

551:

That's tough, because the common dandelion page has not yet been created. I think that ideally a little of the information should be verified and kept there, though most could just be deleted. Eventually the page can be redirected or simply deleted. I don't think we need a page on this.

424:

Thank you for taking the time to explain this. With all the television advertising, I have sometimes wondered if diseases or disorders ("social anxiety disorder" comes to mind) are invented to sell pharmaceuticals. Alas it would not surprise me if aging is someday labeled a disorder.

2409:

A large multicentre study in the US found that symptomatic patients were 2.4 times more likely to have coeliac disease than not-at-risk groups. Second-degree relatives of a patient with coeliac disease were at 3.5 greater risk and first-degree relatives had a 6-fold greater

2405:

A large multicentre study in the US found a prevalence of 7.5 per thousand individuals in not-at-risk groups, rising to 18 per thousand in symptomatic patients, 26 per thousand in second-degree relatives of a patient with coeliac disease and 45 per thousand in first-degree

592:

While working in the wikification project, I came across this article that probably needs some expert attention. I have no clue what the equation means, so if someone could look at that article, I'd really appreciate it. It needs work to be cleaned up and such. Thanks,

2413:

A large multicentre study in the US found that symptomatic patients were 240% more likely to have coeliac disease than not-at-risk groups. Second-degree relatives of a patient with coeliac disease were at 350% increased risk and first-degree relatives had a 600% greater

1126:

Medical professionalism may deserve an entry of sorts. It is one of the 6 core competancies that the ACGME uses to evalute and accredit residency programs as part of its Outcomes Project. I suspect that is not what the above mentioned entry is referring to, however.

1317:

After doing a bit of searching on the web, I agree that it ought to have its own article. While it has improved, I think it still needs a bit of work. I think there are some elements of advocacy in the article-- and I'm not quite sure it presents a balanced picture.

111:

and refactored this one. Hope that's OK with all of you. I've still left some pretty old discussions here, but curiously Dr. Ruben replied to an older message just some minutes ago that got swept up into the archive before I realized what was happening. The diff is

2590:

from Knowledge, or Wikibooks for that matter. The Wikimedia Board directed the Wikiversity proposal away from classical colleges to more of a "learning by doing"-approach. It's not ment to be a resource on it's own, indeed that's what Knowledge and WikiBooks are

1381:, but that again offers a reason to class an article under neurology. If I heed the objection, it will be because treatment falls into Neurology. If I ignore it, it will be because articles exclusively about treatment will likely remain a small category. 2504:

practice and understanding" (the "right" information is needed to pass exams and practice in a professional manner – i.e. as acceptable to ones peers, within Evidence based medicine and within the social and legal expectations placed upon doctors).

3414:

all licensed physicians can be looked up on the medical board's web site/college's web site and assuming Baer practised in Georgia, before starting his writing career, I just 'googled' for the Georgia medical board and then did a physician search.

2186:

No reference needed. This introduces the outline I've used to seperate the symptoms into luminal, nutrient/micronutrient malabsorption and miscelaneous. If you have a better way of classifying the symptoms please don't hesitate to change it

2540:

So are only academics or registered doctors to write the instructional material ? Clearly this is a wiki and anyone can contribute, but is there to be any vetting process (I suppose somewhat like the stable version assessment for Knowledge

1679:

I'm really no expert here, but seems to me this topic is bound to pop up some day again and nobody will remember this discussion: therefore, how about any of you added some of these thoughts to [[Knowledge:Manual of Style (Medicine-related

3691: 1910: 2530:

As a silly example: one can’t have management of a heart attack as being either thrombolytics or paracetamol and expect a disclaimer to remove liability on wiki foundation from responsibility for having incorrectly taught a medical

1351:

pathology. I also ran into minor objections, one of them being that there are too many categories that some articles would fit in. No big deal in my book, especially since I'm trying to eliminate a category. Some elaborate articles

334:

Actually, I'd prefer if this stays here, since the purpose of my message was to solicit feedback; I agree though that specific discussion of the article will be best suited on the talk page. Thanks for any advice you guys have. —

2499:

Reliability - If it is to instruct (? for developing countries who can not obtain medical textbooks or developed countries medical students as a resource ?) on current accepted practice and understanding then it will need remain

1873:. I would strongly recommend you have it sent for AFD. Let us know when you do. Specific theories on pathogenesis are almost never notable, unless they are earth-shattering (such as all cancers being due to watching television). 1649:

So for any UK doctor thinking about posting images to wikipedia, the same rules about consent and confidentiality will apply as to collecting personalised data (even if later anonymised) and its publication in traditional media.

2627:

Wikiversity is still in it's embryonic phase. Most of the current content has simply been moved from Wikibooks where the project was previously hosted, and of course the content hasn't been modified sufficiently to be reliable

465:

The andropause (as it is sometimes called) is a more gradual process than the menopause. Various preparations of testosterone are available in the UK for male hypogonadism, which may help with ED and osteoporosis in men.

2896:

Short of the long of it is-- they are a for-profit health care rater/consulting firm and use data available from government sources (Medicare & Medicaid surveys), telephone surveys, state medical board --among other

2518:

Target audience. If I have misunderstood wikiversity and it is merely a discussion forum for students to raise questions to be answered by others then 2 issues arise: Firstly there are very few doctors even signed up at

2523:, so are there enough readers who are doctors or medical students to make this worthwhile? Secondly, who then is to moderate the information being given, before some medical student tries something silly on a patient ? 2401:

A large multicentre study in the US found a prevalence of 1:133 in not-at-risk groups, rising to 1:56 in symptomatic patients, 1:39 in second-degree relatives of a patient with coeliac disease and 1:22 in first-degree

2397:

A large multicentre study in the US found a prevalence of 0.75% in not-at-risk groups, rising to 1.8% in symptomatic patients, 2.6% in second-degree relatives of a patient with coeliac disease and 4.5% in first-degree

2149:"Some patients are diagnosed with symptoms related to the decreased absorption of nutrients or with symptoms which, although statistically linked, have no clear relationship with the malfunctioning bowel." - reference? 2437:

Personally, I like #3-- but #2 is probably a bit easier to understand for the lay public. Though not prevalence per se, absolute numbers are often useful-- i.e. over one million patients worldwide are on some for of

1412:

the point that "Neurology" is a medical discipline and thus is the practice of medicine to neurological disorders. Medical articles do not need to be listed under every possible classification scheme as you suggest -

3677: 2694:

wether or not the images should stay; many others seem te find them disgusting. I think this could apply to more cases, maybe it's important to have some kind of consensus on this matter? Any advice to untie that

3551:

NOTE: Knowledge is a collaborative online resource with many potential authors. This can have positive and negative implications. We recommend you treat wikipedia articles with an increased level of scepticism.

2890: 1042:... but title "hijacked" what I would consider normal use of the term, so conflict of professional behaviour under healthcare organisation restrictions would be better served by a reworded title. As I posted to 3214:

Prothrombin complex is a specific drug. My drug guide says it "Consists of purified plasma-derived factors II, IX and X. This product also contains heparin 200 units and antithrombin III 25 units per vial."

621:

Thanks, wow, that's a big difference between where it started and where it ended up. Of course I don't fully understand it still, but I understand it much better than I did in its previous state. Thanks.

481: 2526:

Liability – (Closely tied to reliability) Currently wikipedia has appropriate disclaimers re the information contained, so presumably as School of Medicine aims to instruct so it needs to be “correct”.

2381:

article, I found that the prevalence was expressed as a percentage. I continued this when adding another sentence, even though the source data I used gave a 1:XX ratio. There is an excellent article by

1709:. But I have no medical training and would appreciate it if someone with more of a clue could take a brief look and see if I misrepresented anything or left out something blindingly obvious. Thanks. -- 855: 2057:

I had a look at the polycythemia case entry, and while it's a good clinical case, material contained in the case interpretation should be encyclopedized into the article as opposed to placing an EL --

499:

psychoactive agents), so Pharmacology, Medicines & Therapeutics all would be problematic - and hey, this is the WikiProject Drugs so its navigation templates should be 'Drug navigation boxes' :-)

260:

Yes, you should improve Uses (maybe the most important section in the article). "Should I describe the specific lesions that are stented? Specific trials?" I think, yes. As the main part of the topic.

701: 2496:

Duplication - There is a real risk of huge duplication with wikipedia; think almost all of human anatomy, much of biochemistry, physiology, psychology, medicine & surgical and disease wikipages.

677:

for Authors - "Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work". The few books appear to be exam-cram guides of limited shelf-life.

1816: 1646:

inaccuracies duly noted (doctors are not obliged to make any factual changes requested, but would then have to record the patients requests, reasons for it and why they disagree with the changes).

3175:

is used anywhere outside of the Netherlands? I could only find information about it on dutch websites. If not, what do you use to treat patients receiving oral anticoagulants who are bleeding? --

3301:

indication from him or anyone else when or where he went to medical school. The bottom line is that there is nothing to verify his medical background other what he states that it is. Thoughts? -

3068:

makes it clear that it is not an STD. As such, I've removed it from the template, but one editor disputes this. The template is now blocked because of an edit war. Comments are requested. --

3260:

has added appears to have been copied from drug data sheets and his Talk page indicates he has a (short) history of adding copied material. The subject matter is beyond my area of expertise. -

923:

So is this all a genuine use of expression in US, an essay needing wikifying (i.e. addition of content rather than external links), spaming for Institute on Medicine As A Profession or what ?

3709: 826: 805: 515: 3755: 3965: 2229:

I really don't know, there is only one image in commons. It's not your fault, i was just wondering. I found images for melanoma article on a homepage for example. I'll try to search.

94: 3960: 3955: 3943: 3938: 3930: 3021:

and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. I

231:

and I could definitely use some help. (I can't believe there wasn't already an article on it!) It's definitely one of the biggest articles I've tried writing from scratch (that and

89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3256:

I was wondering if someone might want to briefly check the contributions of a new user who has been adding information to various pharmaceutical articles. Some of the information

656:

is a physician and author of a few medical review books. I'm thinking about nominating the article for deletion on the grounds that he doesn't appear to meet the standards set by

1593: 762: 1062:

or some such qualifier that indicates that the subject is both about the bioethics of medical practice and with the specific regard to how it interacts with external pressures ?

3150:

A recent edit has removed a point of controversy in Emergency Medicine. Before adding back the information, I'd like others thoughts, since I am some what personally biased.

1271:

and sexual education that promotes condom use). The article, as written, conveniently side steps the evidence that suggests being overweight, and in particular being morbidly

3294: 3061:. The American Association for Studies of the Liver (AASLD) does not even recommend the need for barrier protection in monogamous couples where one member has Hepatitis C 2390:. In the discussion that followed the article, someone posted details of a related article from Science magazine. BTW: I think most wikidocs here would enjoy Ben's writing. 1623:

Just to be on the safe side, I think it would be advisable to get a patients consent before uploading them, regardless wether or not it is legal to do it without consent. --

1259:; it isn't that I disagree with the point that chronic dieting is bad-- it is that having a steady weight that is substantially higher than normal is unhealthy. As such, 3723: 2875:

states: "BAMC was just recently ranked among the top 5% of hospitals in the in the US for clinical excellence by HealthGrades." I found a relevant link about this award

2327:. Interested users can have a look and maybe weigh in on several issues posted there. Maybe we could create a Task Force within this project to cover those articles? 1759:. Someone with socks keeps adding "Behavioral myopia" (a concept that gets only 4 Google hits) to a part of the article that makes a true description false. Thanks! - 3663: 1890: 3635: 3916: 3769: 2094: 1597: 47: 17: 3649: 3581: 2513:(Scientific Point Of View) – i.e. wikipedia may report on a commonly held belief even if not supported by fact, instructional material has to be “correct”. 1113:

which is not the mascot of some university we might be able to discuss some of the issues there and redirect several less NPOV page names to the concept?

965:

Indeed, I would have thought it should refer to ethics and professionalism. Not sure what you mean by "speedy copyvio tag" - for me to promptly apply the

3392:

Thanks. "Gregory S. Baer" appears to match up with the same "Greg Baer" in a Google search. How did you know where to look to find that information: -->

3278:

appears to be a notable author of relationship books based on sales, I am not sure how his medical background should be addressed in the article. In an

1844:. The Radical Induction Theory of Ulcerative Colitis was proposed in one paper by Dr. Jay Pravda. It has never been cited by another publication, but 3783: 133: 108: 2037:) has been inserting links to the site that bears his username, which contains case reports and howto's. We now disagree on whether a link of his on 1023:

as a movement within medicine (even if the name given is new or a neologism). It should certainly be covered in some article (even if not this one).

2129:

I was wondering if you'd all could be so kind as to take a look, improve that is necessary, or mentioned major misrepresentations on the talk page.

3534: 1033:

I see article now been deleted by an admin as a speedy copyvio, but I agree InvictaHOG some of points raised were worthy of comment and commentry.

263:

In my opinion, the leading should be a summary of the article, and a section called Structure or somewhat should be written about the stent itself.

3052:

is an STD. Sexual transmission of Hepatitis C is very low, and even the CDC no longer lists sexual transmission as a risk factor of hepatitis C.

1995:

Yes, I think they're really different topics. Have a look at the first two paragraphs of the full-body scan article. I didn't know it neither. :)

2324: 858:. At present, it looks likely to fail due to being not long enough (39 names). Your comments (either way) would be appreciated. The criteria are 2546:

The above all seems very negative, I suppose I need the Wikiversity School of Medicine explaining to me, and how it differs from Knowledge. PS

841:, would there be many entries left? If not, and there is little hope to improve the situation, then a separate list article may end up deleted. 603:

I took a crack at it. I think the basics are now there, but it is probably close to incomprehensible if you don't have an engineering degree.

570: 170: 2648:

Clearly learning at Wikiversity would require a high level of independent working, not just reading articles on that Wiki and passing a test.

891:

article which unless one understands that 'medical professionalism' is some form of rear-guard action by doctors, seems to make little sense.

2034: 1400: 2125:

On the whole, I think it looks pretty good. I've had some input from Samir and Webaware. But before I submit this for actual project-wide

2876: 859: 3444: 3128:

I also removed Hepatitis A. Although certain practices could lead to sexual transmission of this enterovirus, it is by no means an STD.

2855: 573:, once the information has been verified, and the page redirected there. This would be more likely to meet with consensus initially. -- 1059: 1055: 1267:

program-- something that is a difficult sell in the USA (if one considers the rejection of effective public health measures such as

1051: 538: 3108:

It seems to be solved. Anyway you're a hepatitis expert, your references seem to be perfect. The template mustn't be on that page.

1106: 3443:

Not a participant in this project, and probably the wrong place to put this, but Fiona Godlee has "cited" Knowledge (most likely

2879:. Can anyone shed some information on this award? Is this something in which you have to enroll in order to be eligible to win? - 2753:

The above said, I've seen pictures in better taste that are illustrative (in med school). On the topic of peri-anal disease, the

2424:

I wouldn't be surprised if I'd made a mistake rewording all those variations. Any other variations or better wording? Thoughts?

3201: 1934:

Anyone want to have a peek at this new article? I've disputed the use of secondary sources and web sites on the talk page --

1432:

would be pointless and is superfluous as could be applied to all disease articles - instead top level existing categories are

394:

Some of it is driven by the pharmaceutical industry, as well. Take a look at Androgel advertisements when you get the chance!

2445:

That said, prevalence from countries other than the US is nice. I'll remember to keep an eye out for those banana babies. ;)

1601: 1529:

I don't know about confidentiality, but what about copyright? Are you the radiographer? Does the hospital retain any rights?

1157: 1083: 657: 3424: 3379: 3011: 2949: 2815: 2769: 1642: 1327: 1292: 1217: 1173: 674: 612: 1066:

interesting and important - but the contentious issues this raises will need very careful writing if not to fall foul of

664:, but I though it might be wise to get some feedback here first. Does being an author guarantee inclusion in Knowledge? - 851: 661: 639:

I'm trying to find out when the state of New Jersey started regulating psychotherapy. Thanks in advance for any help. --

3242:

article. It looks pretty good (although of course can always be improved) and has been accepted as a Featured Article.

1798:. While the article describes things that may be unique to India, the entities themselves are essentially identical. 905:

Worse still the article's various sections seem to be mere introductions to the various multiple full raw URL links to

743:. The two primary suggestions were to move the section to a list page or to enforce the requirement for references per 569:(as the article claims) and not the other species, the page could be renamed Taraxacum officinale, as suggested on the 3884: 3846: 3837: 3825: 3790: 3776: 3762: 3748: 3730: 3716: 3702: 3684: 3670: 3656: 3642: 3620: 3588: 3562: 3543: 3526: 3513: 3474: 3464: 3428: 3397: 3383: 3305: 3264: 3246: 3224: 3208: 3194: 3179: 3161: 3138: 3122: 3102: 3079: 3015: 2996: 2979: 2953: 2883: 2862: 2837: 2819: 2795: 2773: 2730: 2710: 2677: 2570: 2558: 2487: 2462: 2431: 2367: 2313: 2301: 2278: 2262: 2243: 2224: 2207: 2176: 2139: 2108: 2077: 2068: 2051: 2009: 1982: 1965: 1945: 1923: 1903: 1883: 1830: 1802: 1779: 1763: 1744: 1720: 1691: 1671: 1654: 1627: 1611: 1587: 1568: 1550: 1536: 1522: 1506: 1491: 1476: 1456: 1437: 1331: 1296: 1242: 1221: 1187: 1177: 1131: 1117: 1094: 1037: 1027: 1008: 998: 973: 952: 927: 869: 812: 791: 773: 755: 740: 721: 708: 694: 684: 668: 643: 626: 616: 597: 577: 556: 545: 527: 503: 488: 470: 459: 449: 429: 418: 407: 398: 389: 379: 342: 317: 295: 278: 242: 214: 182: 158: 3062: 653: 519:: I've proposed this as a Manual of Style guideline to writing medical articles, please comment on that talk page!-- 3907: 3879: 3615: 2832: 2705: 2672: 2482: 2362: 2257: 2103: 1686: 1445: 1079: 770: 524: 339: 239: 38: 1204:

seems to be a criticism of the dominant opinion in the medical profession... perhaps it should be merged into the

1196:

Clean-up and NPOV... beyond that I'm not quite sure. I think merging would be a good thing... just not sure how.

3311:

There is info on the web about Baer -- that is if he is called "BAER, GREGORY SHERWIN". A quickie search of the

3098: 3075: 2992: 2971:. Although it screams "advertisement", I was hoping for a second opinon as to whether it meets the guidelines at 2064: 1941: 1826: 1667: 2902:

The relationship between this organization and the health industry reminds me a bit about what emerged from the

2509:

who do not have access to other sources, how are they to confirm the information and so rely upon Wikiversity ?)

2190:

Please copyedit the genetics section. What links do you want? OMIM is already linked from the diseases infobox.

2028: 1795: 1449: 2347: 2309:

Very nice work. I added a couple of small points and moved a paragraph about diagnosis to the proper section.

1546:

lot of x-rays, etc. on Knowledge and I think that it must be okay. I just want to be extra careful, you know?

1396: 941: 912: 895: 3449: 3092: 3069: 2986: 2872: 2787: 2058: 1935: 1841: 1820: 1791: 1661: 1638: 1197: 1161: 3738:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who have published in Public Library of Science journals

2456:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who have published in Public Library of Science journals

1239: 1152:

articles (how I'd describe 'em) need some attention. There are bunch and they are growing. The latest is

751:. Anyone else have a preference before I do this? Anyone willing to back me up if the change is reverted? - 3239: 3232: 2602:, with diploma's or certificates. There are no exams. It's obvious that that would cause liability issues. 1715: 193: 3257: 1392: 3874: 3610: 3602: 3220: 3190: 2827: 2803: 2700: 2667: 2477: 2357: 2252: 2098: 1681: 1480: 1441: 1429: 1417: 1413: 1378: 766: 520: 336: 236: 3536:. It is very worrying that the UK NHS's National Library for Health is using Knowledge as a reference. 3499:(not something I do frequently) because it creates the impression it is a bona fide medical condition ( 1799: 1726:

I've left some comments on the talk page. I think this could aid in providing historical background on

3548:

I've emailed them and they were very helpful and responsive. All the entries now include the warning:

3470:

That's pretty cool. I wish the article had references itself so we could make sure it really is true!

2915: 1416:

can deal with underlying mechanisms of function (but we don't also automatically add to such articles

3814: 3810: 3407: 3157:

I'm looking for other people's thoughts about if and how this should be incorperated in the article.

2911: 1472: 1468: 1421: 1388: 1201: 1153: 269:

Anyway great article, it was interesting to read. Congrat! After these, it can go to peer review. :)

200:, a chromium-containing substance which may ameliorate diabetes. At the moment I'm having a bit of a 126: 623: 594: 3594: 2024: 1975: 1268: 916: 586: 147: 2968: 3508: 3461: 3144: 3133: 2330:

Also, I've asked for a bot to automatically sort pages needing expert attention into categories.

2273: 2219: 2134: 2046: 1918: 1898: 1878: 1845: 1837: 1808: 1774: 1739: 1517: 1425: 1043: 456: 444: 426: 404: 228: 221: 209: 3584:. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. 3585: 3420: 3375: 3297: 3053: 3007: 2945: 2811: 2765: 2520: 1853: 1710: 1641:

notes and images are ultimately the property of The Crown (i.e. The Queen) via Her Majesty's

1433: 1371: 1323: 1288: 1256: 1213: 1169: 909:???? (which are lists of papers rather than any single paper, opinion, collated analysis etc). 906: 608: 467: 436: 900:"to protest the restrictions on service delivery imposed by health maintenance organizations" 3741: 3606: 3523: 3520: 3216: 3205: 3186: 3176: 3118: 3045: 2910:

in the case of Enron) were also doing management consulting, which has been criticized as a

2726: 2459: 2443: 2297: 2239: 2203: 2172: 2074: 2005: 1961: 1624: 1075: 966: 313: 291: 274: 232: 178: 3454: 2985:

AfD. For sure. But I have a conflict of interest: I turned them down for my LASIK :( --

2493:

What is the remit of Wikiversity School of Medicine, or to be blunter - what's the point ?

152: 3866: 3834: 3560: 3541: 3471: 3312: 2907: 2691: 2555: 2429: 2378: 2337: 2119: 1702: 1651: 1609: 1584: 1547: 1534: 1503: 1484: 1453: 1234: 1114: 1091: 1034: 1024: 1005: 970: 924: 867: 788: 691: 682: 553: 500: 395: 120: 969:

tag as I have already now done, or that there is a more urgent tag than copyvio itself ?

3113: 2928:

and license their ratings, data and advisory services to: 1. Help top-ranking providers

2721: 2473: 2292: 2234: 2198: 2167: 2000: 1956: 3869:

and I are involved in a tedious revert war involving external link spam in the article

3458: 3291: 3158: 2972: 2567: 2439: 2310: 1870: 1849: 1264: 1128: 1071: 1067: 640: 415: 137: 3279: 2420:

say children of banana babies are six times more likely to get rare bowel disease. ;-)

385:

Much of the article appears to be copied from various websites. I'll fix what I can. -

3818: 3806: 3695: 3504: 3493: 3411: 3243: 3129: 2859: 2269: 2215: 2130: 2042: 1914: 1894: 1874: 1862: 1848:

contains four references to it, and 12 lines of text based on it. Does this violate

1770: 1735: 1513: 994:

to speedy delete. I think you have to put the text back to use that header, though. -

714: 673:

Go for it. Very much a vanity page. Agree with your doctor/book failures. Also fails

485: 440: 205: 3416: 3371: 3003: 2941: 2807: 2761: 2696: 2383: 2126: 2038: 1979: 1370:

Buttressing my rationale, in a rough manner of side issues, is a relatively unused

1319: 1284: 1209: 1165: 991: 838: 748: 604: 574: 376: 1428:

should apply to the development of the medical speciality and diseases it covers.

3533:

Try this Google search for "Knowledge" on the "www.clinicalanswers.nhs.uk" site:

1755:

I think I've already crossed the 3RR line, so I could use a bit of assistance in

403:

Okay, I am curious. Is there anything to a 'male menopause', or is it all bogus?

3915:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3109: 3088:

is sexually transmitted. It's not listed in the most recent CDC MMWR as an STD

3085: 3065: 3049: 3037: 2760:(with pictures)... though not advisable to view whilst eating or just prior to. 2717: 2657:

So, does that clear out one or two issues? More questions are very much welcome!

2288: 2230: 2194: 2163: 1996: 1952: 1866: 1110: 834: 784: 744: 309: 287: 270: 174: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3843: 3692:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Radical Induction Theory of Ulcerative Colitis

3556: 3537: 3026: 2783: 2779: 2425: 1911:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Radical Induction Theory of Ulcerative Colitis

1605: 1583:

Is this a sort of educational fair use, or is Knowledge an allowable setting?

1530: 863: 678: 374:

There is a question as to whether there is an equivalent ‘andropause' in men.

368: 355: 3283: 3091:. I'd prefer not to have it on an STD template without striking evidence -- 3089: 3059: 2551: 3870: 3858: 3577: 3571: 3486: 3403: 3275: 1727: 1706: 1280: 1276: 945: 227:

I hope you're not tired of me announcing my articles here, but I just wrote

3056: 2758: 2158:

I couldn't find more images... I don't know where we should search for one.

286:

PS:"I hope you're not tired of me announcing my articles here" - NEVER! :)

495:

drugs (more free flowing style with several classes per line seemed best).

136:

and refactored this page. I will move the most recent discussions over. --

3822: 3787: 3773: 3759: 3745: 3727: 3713: 3699: 3681: 3667: 3653: 3639: 3394: 3302: 3287: 3261: 2976: 2964: 2880: 1760: 1565: 1488: 1184: 995: 949: 888: 809: 752: 718: 705: 665: 542: 386: 363: 1205: 1148: 1139: 830: 732: 717:

if interested in a strange exchange with the subject of this article. -

3172: 2417: 2086: 1756: 565:

If the "medicinal properties of dandelion" can be attributed only to

308:

If you don't mind I move this discussion to the article's talk page.

3678:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Russian american medical association

3580:

is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found

2554:

strike me as being naïve and fail to address above points/concerns.

173:. Please leave comments, help to create correct guidelines. Thanks. 3238:

Thanks to everyone who worked on, peer-reviewed, and discussed the

2154:

Genetics section has major problems (copy-edit, reference, linking)

2903: 1272: 2387: 482:

Knowledge:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-09 Pharmacology Templates

2754: 2547: 2073:

But as long as it is not all in there, it is a valuable link. --

1731: 1564:

removed and 2) the patient has not specified they not be used. -

1164:. Might be good to nip this in the bud before it gets bigger... 1109:

sound? That's bound to be NPOV! I guess if we create a page for

902:- certainly not how I would use term 'medical professionalism'. 2806:-- that in theory could differentiate into almost anything. :) 484:. Further feedback from interested parties would be welcome. -- 3894: 1355:

get into many categories. This is my thinking, if I continue:

702:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Mariano Anto Bruno Mascarenhas

455:

yep. I had no idea there was an article on it. That's great!

366:? In my endocrinology book, they have one small paragraph on 25: 1817:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Maths, science, and technology

1263:

is a misleading phrase. Conceptually, it really amounts to a

1183:

Are you suggesting clean-up, merge/redirect to FAM, or AfD? -

783:

summary style and listing. The standard for all Knowledge is

2333:

To add an article to this category, replace you can replace

1497:

Questions about radiology images and patient confidentiality

936:

You may want to consider replacing the copyvio tag with the

480:

Several users are currently discussing formatting issues at

2325:

Category:Pages needing attention from an expert in medicine

2319:

Category:Pages needing attention from an expert in medicine

907:

http://www.imapny.org/libdocs/libdocs_list.htm?attrib_list=

3710:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Chauhan (physician)

1856:-- 07:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 07:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1082:(otherwise seen as personal opinion and this would breach 806:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (Medicine-related articles)

516:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style (Medicine-related articles)

510:

RfQ guideline: Manual of Style (Medicine-related articles)

3185:

Yes, it's usually called cofactor or a hemostatic agent.

2932:

2. Help providers assess their current level of care and

2287:

I join. Great article, absolutely ready for peer review.

1769:

Political myopia? Clinical myopia? It's a great metonym!

107:

The page was getting unmanageably large, so I've created

3756:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Shahraban Abdullah (Dr.)

3200:

Just found out that the more general term often used is

3609:

did... I'm inviting everyone to improve this article!--

884: 736: 113: 2618:

6) Indeed there is only a small target audience -yet.

1594:

Knowledge:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2006_March_25

898:

is a very odd piece - its seems an essay on attempts

763:

Knowledge:Manual of Style (Medicine-related articles)

2906:

scandal-- how in the USA accounting firms/auditors (

2579:

Wow, lot's of questions and misinterpretations here.

2742:

Move the pictures to a separate page with a warning

1359:NeuroScience and Disease, then it properly belongs 3873:. I'd appreciate any third party help! Thanks. -- 3724:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sumer Kumar Sethi 2802:Well... at this stage of my training, I'm like a 2778:Does this mean we've turned the Nephron into the 2739:I think there are a couple of ways one could go: 761:If there is consensus, this could become part of 196:whether there is an endogenous form of the yeast 3048:and is vehemently arguing without evidence that 1060:Medical professionalism under healthcare systems 1056:Medical professionalism and healthcare provision 3084:Also, there is little evidence (but some) that 2386:on the problems of communicating such numbers: 1487:. Anyone care to comment before this is done? - 1891:Radical Induction Theory of Ulcerative Colitis 1052:Medical professionalism and healthcare systems 731:I am about to make a change to the section in 3664:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Na'ama Yehuda 3636:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Quackpotwatch 2612:a discussion forum for questions and answers. 1208:article. Anyone else have thoughts on this? 1107:the dark, seedy underbelly of modern medicine 1105:I don't know of an actual name, but how does 362:Anyone else think this article is borderline 8: 3770:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Toby Meltzer 3605:, hoping that it will have the same fate as 2889:There is info about it on their web page -- 2095:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Enzyme 1598:Knowledge:Image copyright issues for dummies 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine 3650:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Phytofruit2 3322: 2605:3) POV would equally apply to the project. 1974:Does Knowledge need both this article and 1512:What law could be violated by doing that? 808:to develop some consensus on what to do. - 3784:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kha Hoang 2716:I've made a comment there. Hard problem. 151: 2926:form alliances with healthcare providers 1705:, pharmacologist who published lots on 3913:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1951:I reacted on the article's talk page. 1255:The research study cited looks like a 372:in the menopause section, and it says 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3044:Someone has made a template on STD's 7: 2826:Thanks everyone for your interest!-- 2641:the scope of the School of Medicine? 1448:which in turn has subcategories, eg 192:Having an interesting discussion on 3833:I would redirect to oculoplastics. 2856:Template talk:Interventions infobox 2393:Anyway, which do people find best: 2118:I've spent most of today improving 1697:Expert help for V. Craig Jordan bio 1502:because I just don't know the law! 1346:Merjing NeuroScience into Neurology 850:You may be interested to know that 3447:) in her editorial in this week's 2214:What images should we use anyway? 787:and these lists are no different. 24: 2782:? I'll even (grudgingly) accept 1283:. As such, I think it has a POV. 700:Thanks for the input. It's up at 539:Medicinal properties of dandelion 533:Medicinal properties of dandelion 3898: 3485:Someone kindly alerted me about 3406:, Baer was born in and lives in 3112: 2975:prior to consider AfD. Thanks! - 2720: 2690:I'm having a discussion over at 2291: 2233: 2197: 2166: 1999: 1955: 1200:seems to be a political thing. 737:People famous for their eyebrows 29: 3202:prothrombin complex concentrate 2093:If anyone might be interested: 1160:. It grew indirectly from the 727:Famous people with... (Part II) 3885:08:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 3838:17:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 3826:07:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 3791:07:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 3777:05:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC) 3763:03:43, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 3621:20:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC) 3589:22:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC) 3563:10:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 3544:08:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC) 3527:21:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 3514:18:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC) 3475:21:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 3465:21:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 3429:04:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC) 3398:20:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 3384:05:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC) 3306:06:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC) 3265:03:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC) 3247:23:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC) 3225:12:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 3209:12:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 3195:12:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 3180:12:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 3016:20:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 2930:promote their quality services 2820:20:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC) 2552:Wikiversity:Welcome, newcomers 2474:Wikiversity School of Medicine 2468:Wikiversity School of Medicine 1602:Knowledge:Image copyright tags 804:I've brought up this issue at 658:Knowledge:Notability (doctors) 654:Mariano Anto Bruno Mascarenhas 254:I fixed references to be small 1: 3749:05:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 3731:17:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 3626:Various articles for deletion 3601:I've put this article up for 3282:given to his brother, in an 3162:16:41, 9 September 2006 (UTC) 3139:18:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3123:06:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3103:06:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 3080:06:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2997:05:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2980:05:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2954:04:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2934:identify areas of improvement 2884:04:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 2863:23:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2838:21:28, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2796:10:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2774:03:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 2731:06:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 2711:13:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2678:14:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2571:02:55, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2559:02:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 2488:23:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2463:19:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2432:15:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2368:13:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2314:20:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2302:17:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2279:16:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2263:13:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2244:17:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2225:20:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 2208:17:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC) 2177:17:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 2140:16:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 2109:01:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC) 1692:00:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC) 1643:Secretary of State for Health 1446:Category:Pharmacologic agents 1156:, which I think borders on a 675:Knowledge:Notability (people) 2868:RfC: Bay Area Medical Center 2450:Another article for deletion 1377:Someone objected to a fifth 852:List of people with epilepsy 662:Knowledge:Notability (books) 165:Medical Genetics WikiProject 159:13:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 3847:15:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC) 3800:RfC: Which way to redirect? 3717:17:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 3703:17:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 3685:04:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 3671:22:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 2748:Combination of #1 & #2. 2454:For whoever is interested: 2078:06:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2069:04:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 2052:11:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 2010:16:57, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1983:16:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1966:14:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1946:14:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC) 1924:16:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1904:16:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1884:15:57, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1842:Talk:Ulcerative colitis#RfC 1831:07:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 1803:19:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC) 1780:08:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1764:04:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1745:10:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 1721:08:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC) 1672:19:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 1655:22:25, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1628:21:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1612:21:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1588:20:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1569:20:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1551:20:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1537:20:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1523:19:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1507:18:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 1492:00:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 1477:Medical tourism in Thailand 1457:23:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 1438:Category:Medical treatments 1332:05:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 1297:09:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 1243:22:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 1222:07:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1188:04:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1178:03:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1132:14:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 1118:04:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1095:01:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 1078:the opinions as those from 944:seems to be some subset of 915:is also a clear copyvio of 635:regulation of psychotherapy 504:23:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 128:20:46:08, 2005-08-15 (UTC) 3989: 3657:21:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 2686:Hemorrhoids are disgusting 1861:It holds a ground between 1637:As for copyright - all UK 1038:12:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1028:00:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1009:00:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 999:00:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 974:23:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 953:23:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 928:23:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 870:10:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 813:02:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 792:00:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 774:00:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 756:23:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 722:03:59, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 709:15:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 695:11:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 685:08:27, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 669:03:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 537:Opinions on how to handle 257:what about external links? 3643:05:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 2745:Try to find illustrations 2615:5) Anyone can contribute. 1467:It has been suggested in 1444:, which together lead to 644:04:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 627:22:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 617:21:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 598:20:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 578:06:54, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 557:23:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 546:23:30, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 528:12:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 489:07:18, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 471:08:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 460:06:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 450:07:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 430:05:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 419:02:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 408:01:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 399:00:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 390:22:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 380:22:04, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 343:14:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 318:18:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 296:10:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 279:10:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 243:09:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 215:17:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 183:16:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 2967:was recently created by 2373:Communicating prevalence 2251:Looks fantastic to me.-- 1796:medical student syndrome 1450:Category:Anticonvulsants 825:I've made some comments 741:previous discussion here 198:glucose tolerance factor 3410:. So, knowing that in 2873:Bay Area Medical Center 1792:first clinical syndrome 1786:First clinical syndrome 1639:National Health Service 1275:, leads to substantial 1198:Fat acceptance movement 1162:Fat acceptance movement 1084:WP:No original research 942:Medical professionalism 913:medical professionalism 896:medical professionalism 878:Medical professionalism 856:Featured list candidate 169:I started this project 132:As above, I've created 3630:For those interested: 3240:acute myeloid leukemia 3233:acute myeloid leukemia 3025:for this advertorial. 3023:strongly recommend AfD 2891:healthgrades.com - FAQ 2854:Feedback requested at 1794:should be merged with 1070:and also will need to 476:Pharmacology Templates 194:Talk:Diabetes mellitus 3911:of past discussions. 3325:BAER, GREGORY SHERWIN 3313:Georgia Medical board 2804:pluripotent stem cell 1481:Medical Tourism India 1442:Category:Pharmacology 1418:Category:Biochemistry 1414:Category:neuroscience 1406:08:30, 14 August 2006 42:of past discussions. 3815:Oculoplastic surgery 3811:Oculoplastic surgery 3439:Knowledge ref in BMJ 3286:from a book, on his 2912:conflict of interest 1889:Sorry, I meant send 1701:I created a bio for 1473:Medical value travel 1469:Talk:Medical tourism 1463:RfC: Medical tourism 1422:Category:Electricity 1269:safe injection sites 1261:Health at Every Size 1202:Health at Every Size 1158:vanispamcruftisement 1154:Health at Every Size 567:taraxacum officinale 3595:Tree of Hippocrates 3327: 3258:User:Chrisgaffneymd 3231:Thanks for work on 3171:I was wondering if 2699:might be helpful.-- 2193:It has been fixed. 1976:Computed tomography 1080:WP:Reliable sources 587:Stress Strain Index 220:Input requested at 3597:is a DYK candidate 3323: 3145:Emergency Medicine 2921:Healthgrades FAQ: 2757:has a nice review 2114:Peer review wanted 1852:? Crossposted at 1846:ulcerative colitis 1838:Ulcerative colitis 1815:Cross-posted from 1809:Ulcerative colitis 1430:Category:treatment 1426:Category:Neurology 1379:category:treatment 229:drug-eluting stent 222:Drug-eluting stent 3971: 3970: 3923: 3922: 3917:current talk page 3883: 3875:Steven Fruitsmaak 3619: 3611:Steven Fruitsmaak 3511: 3427: 3382: 3364: 3363: 3136: 3101: 3078: 3014: 2995: 2952: 2836: 2828:Steven Fruitsmaak 2818: 2793: 2772: 2709: 2701:Steven Fruitsmaak 2676: 2668:Steven Fruitsmaak 2588:duplicate content 2548:Wikiversity:About 2486: 2478:Steven Fruitsmaak 2377:In reviewing the 2366: 2358:Steven Fruitsmaak 2276: 2261: 2253:Steven Fruitsmaak 2222: 2137: 2107: 2099:Steven Fruitsmaak 2067: 2049: 1944: 1921: 1901: 1881: 1829: 1777: 1742: 1690: 1682:Steven Fruitsmaak 1670: 1520: 1436:with subcategory 1434:Category:Medicine 1405: 1391:comment added by 1372:category:medicine 1330: 1295: 1257:strawman argument 1220: 1176: 883:New editor added 833:, if you enforce 767:Steven Fruitsmaak 615: 521:Steven Fruitsmaak 447: 437:disease mongering 251:categorize please 212: 149: 144: 142: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3980: 3952: 3927: 3926: 3902: 3901: 3895: 3877: 3613: 3607:Robinow syndrome 3509: 3498: 3492: 3419: 3374: 3340:Expiration Date 3328: 3134: 3116: 3097: 3074: 3046:Template:STD/STI 3006: 2991: 2944: 2830: 2810: 2791: 2764: 2724: 2703: 2670: 2480: 2360: 2352: 2346: 2342: 2336: 2295: 2274: 2255: 2237: 2220: 2201: 2170: 2135: 2101: 2089:nominated for FA 2063: 2047: 2041:is appropriate. 2003: 1959: 1940: 1919: 1899: 1879: 1825: 1775: 1740: 1718: 1713: 1684: 1666: 1518: 1404: 1385: 1322: 1287: 1240:Chartreuse green 1212: 1168: 967:Template:copyvio 917:About IMAPNY.org 607: 445: 435:Molly, you mean 337:Knowledge Seeker 248:Ok, first view: 237:Knowledge Seeker 233:History of Earth 210: 157: 155: 148: 143: 141: 138: 123: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3988: 3987: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3948: 3899: 3862: 3842:I second that. 3802: 3628: 3599: 3575: 3496: 3490: 3483: 3441: 3272: 3254: 3236: 3169: 3148: 3121: 3042: 2962: 2908:Arthur Andersen 2870: 2852: 2729: 2692:Talk:Hemorrhoid 2688: 2600:real university 2586:at all ment to 2470: 2452: 2379:Coeliac disease 2375: 2350: 2348:Expert-Medicine 2344: 2340: 2334: 2321: 2300: 2268:Thanks Steven. 2242: 2206: 2175: 2120:coeliac disease 2116: 2091: 2022: 2008: 1964: 1932: 1913:. Please vote. 1909:Done that, see 1813: 1788: 1753: 1716: 1711: 1703:V. Craig Jordan 1699: 1499: 1485:Medical tourism 1465: 1386: 1348: 1235:grapefruit diet 1143: 880: 854:is currently a 729: 651: 637: 590: 535: 512: 478: 360: 316: 294: 277: 225: 190: 181: 167: 153: 139: 121: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3986: 3984: 3969: 3968: 3963: 3958: 3953: 3946: 3941: 3936: 3933: 3921: 3920: 3903: 3861: 3857:Revert war on 3855: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3801: 3798: 3796: 3795: 3780: 3766: 3752: 3734: 3720: 3706: 3688: 3674: 3660: 3646: 3627: 3624: 3598: 3592: 3574: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3530: 3529: 3489:. I tagged it 3482: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3440: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3387: 3386: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3362: 3361: 3360:Ophthalmology 3358: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3345: 3344: 3341: 3338: 3335: 3332: 3317: 3316: 3271: 3270:RfC: Greg Baer 3268: 3253: 3250: 3235: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3198: 3197: 3168: 3165: 3147: 3142: 3126: 3125: 3117: 3041: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3002:some mention. 2961: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2918: 2917: 2899: 2898: 2894: 2869: 2866: 2851: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2746: 2743: 2734: 2733: 2725: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2646: 2642: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2616: 2613: 2606: 2603: 2592: 2580: 2574: 2573: 2562: 2561: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2524: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2510: 2497: 2472:Check out the 2469: 2466: 2451: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2440:renal dialysis 2422: 2421: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2399: 2388:Risky Business 2374: 2371: 2320: 2317: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2296: 2282: 2281: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2238: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2202: 2188: 2180: 2179: 2171: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2156: 2151: 2115: 2112: 2090: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2025:Clinical Cases 2021: 2020:Clinical Cases 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2004: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1969: 1968: 1960: 1931: 1930:Full-body scan 1928: 1927: 1926: 1887: 1886: 1858: 1857: 1812: 1806: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1698: 1695: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1647: 1635: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1540: 1539: 1526: 1525: 1498: 1495: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1408: 1407: 1393:216.234.170.79 1363:in Neurology. 1347: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1265:harm reduction 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1191: 1190: 1142: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1063: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 958: 957: 956: 955: 931: 930: 921: 920: 919: 910: 892: 879: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 845: 844: 843: 842: 829:. Wrt to your 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 797: 796: 795: 794: 777: 776: 728: 725: 698: 697: 650: 647: 636: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 589: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 560: 559: 541:? AfD? Merge? 534: 531: 511: 508: 507: 506: 496: 477: 474: 463: 462: 433: 432: 411: 410: 401: 392: 359: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 312: 301: 300: 299: 298: 290: 273: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 258: 255: 252: 224: 218: 189: 186: 177: 166: 163: 162: 161: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3985: 3976: 3975: 3972: 3967: 3964: 3962: 3959: 3957: 3954: 3951: 3947: 3945: 3942: 3940: 3937: 3934: 3932: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3909: 3904: 3897: 3896: 3892: 3891: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3881: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3863: 3860: 3856: 3853: 3848: 3845: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3836: 3832: 3831: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3824: 3820: 3819:Oculoplastics 3816: 3812: 3808: 3807:Oculoplastics 3803: 3799: 3794: 3792: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3779: 3778: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3765: 3764: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3751: 3750: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3733: 3732: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3719: 3718: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3705: 3704: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3687: 3686: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3673: 3672: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3659: 3658: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3645: 3644: 3641: 3637: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3625: 3623: 3622: 3617: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3596: 3593: 3591: 3590: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3573: 3570: 3564: 3561: 3558: 3555: 3550: 3549: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3542: 3539: 3535: 3532: 3531: 3528: 3525: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3515: 3512: 3506: 3502: 3495: 3488: 3480: 3476: 3473: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3463: 3462:Fvasconcellos 3460: 3456: 3452: 3451: 3446: 3438: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3413: 3412:North America 3409: 3405: 3402:According to 3401: 3400: 3399: 3396: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3370: 3369: 3359: 3356: 3353: 3350: 3347: 3346: 3342: 3339: 3336: 3333: 3330: 3329: 3326: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3315:came up with: 3314: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3304: 3299: 3296: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3269: 3267: 3266: 3263: 3259: 3251: 3249: 3248: 3245: 3241: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3207: 3203: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3178: 3174: 3166: 3164: 3163: 3160: 3155: 3151: 3146: 3143: 3141: 3140: 3137: 3131: 3124: 3120: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3095: 3090: 3087: 3082: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3072: 3067: 3063: 3060: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3039: 3036: 3028: 3024: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2960:RfC: LASIK MD 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2940: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2922: 2920: 2919: 2916: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2900: 2895: 2892: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2867: 2865: 2864: 2861: 2857: 2850:Interventions 2849: 2839: 2834: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2794: 2790: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2732: 2728: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2707: 2702: 2698: 2693: 2685: 2679: 2674: 2669: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2647: 2643: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2617: 2614: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2598:ment to be a 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2572: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2560: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2539: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2525: 2522: 2517: 2511: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2498: 2495: 2494: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2475: 2467: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2457: 2449: 2444: 2441: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2419: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2391: 2389: 2385: 2380: 2372: 2370: 2369: 2364: 2359: 2354: 2349: 2339: 2331: 2328: 2326: 2323:I've started 2318: 2316: 2315: 2312: 2303: 2299: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2280: 2277: 2271: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2259: 2254: 2245: 2241: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2223: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2189: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182:My response: 2178: 2174: 2169: 2165: 2162: 2157: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2138: 2132: 2128: 2123: 2121: 2113: 2111: 2110: 2105: 2100: 2096: 2088: 2085: 2079: 2076: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2061: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2050: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2019: 2011: 2007: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1984: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1938: 1929: 1925: 1922: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1902: 1896: 1892: 1885: 1882: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1818: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1790:This article 1785: 1781: 1778: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1758: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1719: 1714: 1708: 1704: 1696: 1694: 1693: 1688: 1683: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1570: 1567: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1552: 1549: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1538: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1524: 1521: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1496: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1462: 1458: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1409: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1380: 1375: 1373: 1368: 1364: 1362: 1356: 1354: 1345: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1316: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1244: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1189: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1147:advocacy for 1141: 1138:Advocacy for 1137: 1133: 1130: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1048: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1010: 1007: 1002: 1001: 1000: 997: 993: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 975: 972: 968: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 954: 951: 947: 943: 940:copyvio tag. 939: 935: 934: 933: 932: 929: 926: 922: 918: 914: 911: 908: 904: 903: 901: 897: 893: 890: 886: 882: 881: 877: 871: 868: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 848: 847: 846: 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 821: 814: 811: 807: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 793: 790: 786: 781: 780: 779: 778: 775: 772: 768: 764: 760: 759: 758: 757: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 726: 724: 723: 720: 716: 711: 710: 707: 703: 696: 693: 689: 688: 687: 686: 683: 680: 676: 671: 670: 667: 663: 659: 655: 648: 646: 645: 642: 634: 628: 625: 620: 619: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 601: 600: 599: 596: 588: 585: 579: 576: 572: 568: 564: 563: 562: 561: 558: 555: 550: 549: 548: 547: 544: 540: 532: 530: 529: 526: 522: 518: 517: 509: 505: 502: 497: 493: 492: 491: 490: 487: 483: 475: 473: 472: 469: 461: 458: 454: 453: 452: 451: 448: 442: 438: 431: 428: 423: 422: 421: 420: 417: 409: 406: 402: 400: 397: 393: 391: 388: 384: 383: 382: 381: 378: 375: 371: 370: 365: 357: 354: 344: 341: 338: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 319: 315: 311: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 297: 293: 289: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 276: 272: 262: 259: 256: 253: 250: 249: 247: 246: 245: 244: 241: 238: 234: 230: 223: 219: 217: 216: 213: 207: 203: 199: 195: 187: 185: 184: 180: 176: 172: 164: 160: 156: 150: 145: 135: 131: 130: 129: 127: 124: 117: 115: 110: 102: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3974: 3973: 3949: 3925: 3912: 3906: 3893: 3890: 3889: 3865: 3864: 3854: 3830: 3805: 3804: 3797: 3782: 3768: 3754: 3736: 3722: 3708: 3690: 3676: 3662: 3648: 3634: 3629: 3600: 3576: 3500: 3484: 3448: 3445:this article 3442: 3351:Surrendered 3324: 3273: 3255: 3237: 3199: 3170: 3156: 3152: 3149: 3127: 3093: 3083: 3070: 3043: 3022: 2987: 2969:User:Lasikmd 2963: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2871: 2853: 2788: 2697:Gordian knot 2689: 2638: 2609: 2599: 2595: 2587: 2583: 2501: 2471: 2453: 2423: 2392: 2384:Ben Goldacre 2376: 2355: 2332: 2329: 2322: 2308: 2250: 2181: 2153: 2148: 2145:My opinion: 2124: 2117: 2092: 2059: 2039:polycythemia 2031: 2023: 1936: 1933: 1888: 1840:, debate at 1821: 1814: 1800:70.19.131.66 1789: 1754: 1700: 1680:articles)?-- 1678: 1662: 1622: 1500: 1466: 1387:— Preceding 1376: 1369: 1365: 1360: 1357: 1352: 1349: 1260: 1146: 1145:I think the 1144: 1021: 937: 899: 730: 712: 699: 672: 652: 649:Possible AfD 638: 591: 566: 536: 514: 513: 479: 464: 434: 412: 373: 367: 361: 268: 226: 201: 197: 191: 168: 118: 106: 78: 43: 37: 3905:This is an 3867:David Ruben 3404:the article 3357:12/31/1997 3354:02/06/1985 3337:Issue Date 3217:Sarah Ewart 3187:Sarah Ewart 3086:Hepatitis D 3066:own article 3050:Hepatitis C 3038:Hepatitis C 2556:David Ruben 2127:peer review 1652:David Ruben 1454:David Ruben 1111:Beneficence 1092:David Ruben 1044:User:Alwood 1035:David Ruben 1006:David Ruben 971:David Ruben 925:David Ruben 690:Go for it! 501:David Ruben 36:This is an 3966:Archive 10 3835:InvictaHOG 3519:See this: 3472:InvictaHOG 3459:commentary 3343:Specialty 2784:Hepatocyte 2780:Enterocyte 2521:WP:CLINMED 2406:relatives. 2402:relatives. 2398:relatives. 1854:WP:CLINMED 1585:InvictaHOG 1548:InvictaHOG 1504:InvictaHOG 1115:InvictaHOG 1025:InvictaHOG 990:Check out 789:InvictaHOG 692:InvictaHOG 554:InvictaHOG 396:InvictaHOG 369:andropause 356:Andropause 154:I doubt it 122:Encephalon 103:Refactored 95:Archive 10 3961:Archive 9 3956:Archive 8 3950:Archive 7 3944:Archive 6 3939:Archive 5 3931:Archive 1 3871:Psoriasis 3859:Psoriasis 3578:Psychosis 3572:Psychosis 3487:pyroluria 3481:Pyroluria 3455:editorial 3298:mirroring 3290:, and on 3280:interview 3276:Greg Baer 3274:Although 3159:Bdolcourt 2568:Bdolcourt 2311:alteripse 1893:for AFD. 1734:as well. 1728:tamoxifen 1707:tamoxifen 1483:merge to 1281:mortality 1277:morbidity 1129:Bdolcourt 1076:WP:Verify 992:this link 946:Bioethics 735:entitled 715:talk page 641:JWSchmidt 624:Metros232 595:Metros232 571:talk page 416:alteripse 134:Archive 5 109:Archive 4 90:Archive 9 85:Archive 8 79:Archive 7 73:Archive 6 68:Archive 5 60:Archive 1 3501:quod non 3331:License 3244:MastCell 3057:16888612 3040:and STDs 2965:LASIK MD 2924:"... we 2860:Arcadian 2637:So what 2608:4) It's 2594:2) It's 2582:1) It's 2502:accepted 2442:therapy. 2035:contribs 1401:contribs 1389:unsigned 894:In turn 889:Medicine 739:per the 486:Arcadian 364:quackery 188:Diabetes 119:Regards— 3908:archive 3793:</s? 3417:Nephron 3408:Georgia 3372:Nephron 3348:027157 3334:Status 3295:website 3292:various 3288:website 3284:excerpt 3064:. Our 3004:Nephron 2973:WP:CORP 2942:Nephron 2897:things. 2808:Nephron 2762:Nephron 2531:student 2418:Boffins 2187:around. 1980:apers0n 1871:WP:SOAP 1850:WP:SOAP 1712:Siobhan 1320:Nephron 1285:Nephron 1210:Nephron 1206:obesity 1166:Nephron 1149:obesity 1140:obesity 1072:WP:Cite 1068:WP:NPOV 831:Eyebrow 733:Eyebrow 713:See my 605:Nephron 575:apers0n 468:Snowman 377:Jpbrody 202:déjà vu 39:archive 3173:cofact 3167:Cofact 3110:NCurse 2718:NCurse 2541:0.5).? 2338:Expert 2289:NCurse 2231:NCurse 2195:NCurse 2164:NCurse 2087:Enzyme 1997:NCurse 1953:NCurse 1863:WP:NOR 1757:Myopia 1751:Myopia 1479:, and 1440:, and 1353:should 938:speedy 457:jawesq 427:jawesq 405:jawesq 310:NCurse 288:NCurse 271:NCurse 175:NCurse 3880:Reply 3844:EyeMD 3740:(per 3694:(per 3616:Reply 3586:Sandy 3557:Colin 3538:Colin 3094:Samir 3071:Samir 3027:EyeMD 2988:Samir 2904:Enron 2833:Reply 2789:Samir 2786:? -- 2706:Reply 2673:Reply 2483:Reply 2426:Colin 2414:risk. 2410:risk. 2363:Reply 2258:Reply 2104:Reply 2060:Samir 1937:Samir 1822:Samir 1717:Hansa 1687:Reply 1663:Samir 1606:Colin 1531:Colin 1471:that 1273:obese 864:Colin 839:WP:RS 827:there 749:WP:RS 679:Colin 16:< 3582:here 3510:T@lk 3494:NPOV 3221:Talk 3204:. -- 3191:Talk 3135:T@lk 3119:work 3099:धर्म 3076:धर्म 3054:PMID 2993:धर्म 2877:here 2858:. -- 2792:धर्म 2755:AAFP 2727:work 2628:yet. 2591:for. 2550:and 2298:work 2275:T@lk 2240:work 2221:T@lk 2204:work 2173:work 2136:T@lk 2097:. -- 2065:धर्म 2048:T@lk 2029:talk 2006:work 1978:? -- 1962:work 1942:धर्म 1920:T@lk 1900:T@lk 1880:T@lk 1869:and 1867:WP:N 1827:धर्म 1776:T@lk 1741:T@lk 1732:SERM 1730:and 1668:धर्म 1600:and 1592:See 1519:T@lk 1397:talk 1361:only 1279:and 948:. - 885:this 860:here 837:and 835:WP:V 785:WP:V 771:Talk 747:and 745:WP:V 525:Talk 446:T@lk 314:work 292:work 275:work 211:T@lk 179:work 171:here 140:John 114:here 3823:AED 3821:? - 3817:to 3813:or 3809:to 3788:AED 3774:AED 3760:AED 3746:AED 3744:) - 3728:AED 3714:AED 3700:AED 3698:) - 3696:JFW 3682:AED 3668:AED 3666:. - 3654:AED 3652:. - 3640:AED 3638:. - 3603:DYK 3505:JFW 3503:). 3450:BMJ 3395:AED 3303:AED 3262:AED 3252:RfC 3130:JFW 2977:AED 2881:AED 2610:not 2596:not 2584:not 2476:!-- 2343:by 2270:JFW 2216:JFW 2131:JFW 2043:JFW 1915:JFW 1895:JFW 1875:JFW 1819:-- 1811:RfC 1771:JFW 1761:AED 1736:JFW 1566:AED 1514:JFW 1489:AED 1424:), 1185:AED 1074:to 1058:or 1054:or 996:AED 950:AED 887:to 810:AED 753:AED 719:AED 706:AED 704:. - 666:AED 660:or 543:AED 441:JFW 387:AED 206:JFW 116:. 3935:← 3742:WS 3524:WS 3522:-- 3507:| 3497:}} 3491:{{ 3457:• 3453:: 3223:) 3206:WS 3193:) 3177:WS 3132:| 2936:" 2914:. 2666:-- 2639:is 2460:WS 2458:-- 2356:-- 2353:. 2351:}} 2345:{{ 2341:}} 2335:{{ 2272:| 2218:| 2133:| 2075:WS 2045:| 1917:| 1897:| 1877:| 1865:, 1833:: 1773:| 1738:| 1625:WS 1596:, 1516:| 1475:, 1452:. 1420:or 1403:) 1399:• 1086:). 862:. 769:| 523:| 443:| 439:. 358:?? 208:| 204:. 125:| 64:← 3919:. 3882:) 3878:( 3786:- 3772:- 3758:- 3726:- 3712:- 3680:- 3618:) 3614:( 3559:° 3540:° 3425:C 3423:| 3421:T 3393:- 3380:C 3378:| 3376:T 3219:( 3189:( 3012:C 3010:| 3008:T 2950:C 2948:| 2946:T 2893:. 2835:) 2831:( 2816:C 2814:| 2812:T 2770:C 2768:| 2766:T 2708:) 2704:( 2675:) 2671:( 2500:" 2485:) 2481:( 2428:° 2365:) 2361:( 2260:) 2256:( 2106:) 2102:( 2032:· 2027:( 1689:) 1685:( 1608:° 1533:° 1395:( 1328:C 1326:| 1324:T 1293:C 1291:| 1289:T 1218:C 1216:| 1214:T 1174:C 1172:| 1170:T 866:° 681:° 613:C 611:| 609:T 340:দ 240:দ 146:| 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.