173:, it had 485 total nominations, and in the categories, it lists 348 waiting for a review and 141 under review (which includes all review/on hold/2ndopinion noms), which totals 489 rather than 485. I've never figured out what's causing the discrepancy in these category totals, but it's why I trust the Report numbers to be more precise and use them when I get the chance. As far as the interim daily numbers, it's not going to be too far off if sometimes the Nominations page is used, and I think there was one past drive where I managed to get the Nominations page consistently for all 30 days, but for this drive and the last one I've taken the beginning and end numbers from the Reports page.
216:, I checked all three categories by copying the lists and then counting them. There was one in the nominees category that was caused by a category manually added to an article talk page back during its GAN review in 2015, but otherwise the number of entries were what I expected (485); the same for for the 141 under review. The number of nominees awaiting review was off, however: the total given was 348, but there were only 343 actual entries. I don't know why there's a discrepancy there of five entries in the count, but it's important because the Nominations page currently shows five higher than reality when it comes to "waiting for review". What are these five phantoms?
154:
page. I started out this drive using the
Reports page, because the software there gets its numbers by parsing/counting the nominations and reviews on the GAN page at 01:00; it's a simple matter to back off from 01:00 to midnight, and doing diffs lets you know exactly when the new noms or new reviews
300:
boilerplate on category pages is meaningless, in my experience—when something I do causes a change in the membership on any number of category pages, it happens right away, including to the count. I think you'll find that the phantom five are always there on the awaiting page. I had known about the
274:
After that, I'm a bit stuck. The category page does warn that "This list may not reflect recent changes", which might account for it; if the deviation (currently five) fluctuates over time, this might suggest it is just based on lag. Or it could be some other error. By the way, maybe we should move
321:
with "Category:Good article nominees awaiting review". I've just updated GAN counter to use the PAGESINCATEGORY "pages" parameter, which (as far as I can tell) returns the same numbers as before, but it gets rid of the manual subtraction for the subcategories in favor of getting PAGESINCATEGORY to
270:
The number in this category is off by five: it currently says that there are "approximately 342 total" pages in the category, but lists only 337 (page 1: "The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 342 total"; page 2: "The following 137 pages are in this category, out of
155:
were initiated. There have been times (maybe not tonight, but earlier in the drive) where you get there hours (or even days!) late; it isn't feasible to reconstruct numbers when that happens. The problem with the
Nominations page is that it uses categories to base its numbers from (via template
121:, I could be totally missing something, but are the numbers for 18 March (479 outstanding; 339 unreviewed) correct? At present, the nominations page gives the numbers as 484 (+5) and 347 (+8), but Legobot has run only twice since midnight, and added only two articles (
322:
simply exclude them. Unfortunately, it doesn't also get rid of the phantom five for the awaiting review category, which I'd been hoping it might somehow cure, if there were some non-page unseen subcategories or files being included in the count. Oh well.
195:; that makes a lot of sense. The discrepancy is odd, but in any event (and as you say), it's better to work with a consistently generated number than with a number that is subject to change every 20 minutes, with no archive. --
349:
help with the unreviewed ones? Maybe theres some on one list but not the other. I was also thinking whether ones marked as 2nd opinion would effect the count. I'm not a coding expert. It is indeed strange.
43:
Eddie stated on my talk page that he sent notifications to everyone on the GA mailing list. I am going to go through the participants of the last drive and notify anyone who wasn't on the mailing list.
165:), and there are a number of false positives included in the totals. Tonight, as you can see on the Reports page, the 01:00 numbers were 480 and 340; removing the sole new nomination since midnight (
83:
416:
21:
238:
259:
253:
276:
86:. Thanks for participating in the drive! I have now notified everyone who participated in the last drive and hasn't already signed up. (
365:
27:
170:
377:
359:
331:
288:
225:
204:
182:
150:, it's a good question; they are correct. Here's why. There are two places to get the numbers: the Nominations page or the
138:
102:
74:
60:
237:, I agree that the number is off by five. The nominations page ultimately gets its number from the number of articles in
405:
91:
49:
17:
346:
355:
373:
315:
284:
200:
134:
327:
221:
178:
351:
305:
159:
369:
293:
280:
213:
196:
169:
at 00:35) takes the total down to 479 and the total unreviewed down to 339. (When I just looked at
147:
130:
70:
400:... as it's obvious who it goes to, but I'll leave the rest of the awards to the other coords. (
265:"GAN counter|Wait" takes its number from the template "PAGESINCATEGORY:Good article nominees".)
401:
340:
323:
234:
217:
192:
174:
118:
87:
45:
166:
126:
151:
249:
79:
66:
410:
262:
takes its number of unreviewed nominations from the template "GAN counter|Wait".
96:
54:
122:
311:
template and how it worked, though the "Wait" parameter gets its count from
65:
There's a GA mailing list? How would I go about adding myself to that?
28:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/March 2021
395:
84:
Knowledge:WikiProject Good articles/newsletter participants
396:I've given out the Content Review Medal of Merit
239:Category:Good article nominees awaiting review
8:
298:This list may not reflect recent changes
297:
260:WP:Good article nominations/guidelines
254:WP:Good article nominations/guidelines
191:Thanks for the detailed explanation,
7:
35:
279:, which might have more eyes. --
241:, through the following steps:
171:Category:Good article nominees
1:
103:04:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
75:04:31, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
61:04:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
275:this discussion over to the
18:Knowledge talk:Good articles
364:I've asked about the issue
432:
378:04:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
360:02:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
347:User:SDZeroBot/GAN_sorting
332:00:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
289:08:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
271:approximately 342 total").
248:The numbers at the top of
226:01:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
205:00:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
183:05:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
139:03:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
417:01:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
252:are transcluded from
366:at the village pump
22:GAN Backlog Drives
277:regular talk page
26:(Redirected from
423:
413:
344:
320:
314:
310:
304:
164:
158:
99:
57:
31:
431:
430:
426:
425:
424:
422:
421:
420:
411:
398:
352:MrLinkinPark333
338:
318:
316:PAGESINCATEGORY
312:
308:
302:
167:Geoffrey Massey
162:
156:
127:Geoffrey Massey
115:
97:
73:
55:
40:
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
429:
427:
397:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
380:
370:Usernameunique
335:
334:
294:Usernameunique
281:Usernameunique
272:
268:
267:
266:
263:
257:
243:
242:
229:
228:
214:Usernameunique
208:
207:
197:Usernameunique
186:
185:
148:Usernameunique
142:
141:
131:Usernameunique
114:
111:
110:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
69:
39:
36:
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
428:
419:
418:
415:
414:
407:
403:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
362:
361:
357:
353:
348:
342:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
317:
307:
299:
295:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
269:
264:
261:
258:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:
188:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
161:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
117:
116:
112:
104:
101:
100:
93:
89:
85:
81:
78:
77:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
47:
42:
41:
38:Notifications
37:
29:
23:
19:
409:
399:
113:Day 18 tally
95:
53:
341:BlueMoonset
324:BlueMoonset
306:GAN counter
235:BlueMoonset
218:BlueMoonset
193:BlueMoonset
175:BlueMoonset
160:GAN counter
119:BlueMoonset
123:JCB (song)
80:Hog Farm
67:Hog Farm
20: |
152:Reports
82:: It's
412:buidhe
345:Would
296:, the
250:WP:GAN
98:buidhe
56:buidhe
129:). --
16:<
374:talk
368:. --
356:talk
328:talk
285:talk
222:talk
201:talk
179:talk
135:talk
125:and
71:Talk
408:)
404:·
376:)
358:)
350:--
330:)
319:}}
313:{{
309:}}
303:{{
287:)
224:)
203:)
181:)
163:}}
157:{{
137:)
94:)
90:·
52:)
48:·
406:c
402:t
372:(
354:(
343::
339:@
326:(
283:(
256:.
220:(
199:(
177:(
133:(
92:c
88:t
50:c
46:t
44:(
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.