1794:
article and put an image at the top in other prefecture articles (like I did) only for it to be moved down by someone who believes in conformity (which happened to me in both the
English and Japanese versions). So unless there is widespread consensus for putting an image at the top for ALL prefectures, your proposal is not practical for the rest of us. Please look at the Japanese version of Tokyo. (No image on the top, and find Tokyo Tower/Zojiji way toward the bottom. And the caption simply reads, "Tokyo Tower and Zojiji.") I think conforming to the other 47 prefectures and making Tokyo the model article is more important than conforming to other world cities whose number is much fewer. There is also a stronger relevance between Tokyo and the other prefectures than between Tokyo and other major cities.
312:
template, but not be able to add a new entry to the infobox or create a new parameterized template for use in another set of articles. I think my expectations would be about the same regardless of how the infobox is created (raw html, "simplified" table markup, or even wysiwyg editor window). For me (and you may very well disagree) the ability to extract shared formatting information and to standardize the look and contents of infoboxes for a set of articles is well worth the inscrutability of parameterized templates. A built in infobox feature would probably be better, but I can't imagine a way this would provide the standardization aspects of templates. This is of course nothing more than my opinion, which if yours is worth 2 cents is perhaps worth only 1 cent. --
1790:(including the mass media) have mistaken ideas and perceptions of Japan. They tend to focus on the stereotypical and sensational aspects while ignoring the rest of the story and total picture. (Case in point: Look at the map of Japan that is being used in the prefecture articles. No Amami Islands, no Izu/Ogasawara Islands , and no Northern Territories. And Okinawa is not just one island . Any map of the USA does not show Hawaii as just one island. Of course, I understand how this Japan map came to be. But the person who originally made it should have at least drawn in those islands or used a more accurate map.)
391:. Before we go too far with these we'd like to reach a consensus regarding what the content should be. Taku's preference is to include only cities as per the Akita template. Mine is to include both cities and districts as per the Hyogo template. Taku's concern with including both is the potential size of the navobox for prefectures with many cities. I think including both is useful enough to be worth the extra space, and mirrors the situation for US states (most of which have navoboxes including cities and counties in the state, e.g.
470:
1585:
bottom), I no longer feel so strongly about putting an image at the top since seeing the map is more practical. So the status quo is fine with me. But if the
Japanese version and more people favor having a symbolic image above the map, I would not oppose. But I see little chance of this happening right now. And making Tokyo an exception among the prefectures is not a good idea. Setting an example for the other prefectures is much more important than conforming with London, Paris, etc.
516:
1870:
have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in
January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at
35:
895:
723:
359:, about the template vs. no template discussion above - this edit will perhaps mask the edit that added the latest comment). Also note that the template version of the table now includes governor and website. I'm considering swapping the location of the map and prefectural symbol in the table, i.e. map at the top and symbol (perhaps made somewhat smaller) at the bottom with the flower/tree/bird. Is there any objection to this? --
1103:
district the town is in?). If I could do it my way, I would convert the current, single-column list of municipalities under
Geography into a compact navobox (the bottom one you made) and use that for both the Geography topic and the navobox. I don't understand why the current list of municipalities under Geography has to be in a single (or double) column. It only forces everyone to scroll down.
1851:
consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
1781:
after the war. And the fact is, you can see this old vs. new contrast in most major cities and towns all over Japan. Most have temples or castles and modern buildings in co-existence. It is nothing unusual and certainly not peculiar to Tokyo. Whoever wrote the caption probably never went outside Tokyo (and last visited in 1958 or the 1960s).
1466:
1834:. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at
1601:
article could use an up-to-date map showing the land portion of Tokyo-to. The one in the article is good, but excessive detail makes it hard to read, except at full scale. Also, a couple of place names are out of date, and some others (e.g. Takao-yama) disagree with article titles. There's no key to
1102:
I like the bottom one best. If you list only the cities and districts like in the top navobox, it will look like that's all there is in that prefecture. And the people who live in those left-out towns might feel offended. It also makes it harder to navigate to the different towns (who remembers which
311:
of infoboxes as fundamentally a formatting problem) is meta information that must be added to, and in some sense inherently distracts from, the content. This means to me that there is no perfect solution. I'd expect a newbie to be able to correct infobox content in an article using a parameterized
1789:
can be titled "Photographed in Tokyo." We want more people to understand what Tokyo really is, and to not spread popular misconceptions further. There's nothing wrong with calling Tokyo a "city," but Tokyo is not just the 23 wards. If you live in Japan, you would realize how so many overseas people
1780:
As I stated in another note, that particular photo does not define nor symbolize Tokyo. Also, the caption says that the contrast between the old and new "defines Tokyo." It even refers to Tokyo Tower as "hypermodern." Well, it's almost 50 years old, making it one of the oldest major buildings built
270:
In general, I'm in violent agreement with this. On the other hand, I suspect the whole notion of infoboxes and tables is likely to be not very clear for newbies to understand so in this case I don't think there's a huge difference (inline table is at least right there to look at, but I think there
1793:
The Tokyo article should ultimately serve as the model article for the other prefecture articles (vast majority are still stubs). If we see a picture at the top for Tokyo but not for the other prefectures, it would be confusing (like it confused me at first). People might see and imitate the Tokyo
1694:
highlighted", so providing any image other than a map would be somewhat confusing. The symbol image could be replaced with any image you'd like since its alt text and caption are explicit parameters to the template. The point I was making above is that "image first, within the infobox" is within
1670:
Since the Tokyo metropolitan area is thought of as a city by many people around the world (even though it technically is not a city), I believe that an exception to the rule should be made and that the Tokyo Tower and Zozoji image or another famous image of Tokyo should be placed first (before the
1614:
The
Japanese version has a nice map of the municipal boundaries, but it's so small it's virtually useless. If someone can find out where the original came from and see if it's bigger, then great. The main map of Japan should also be changed because it does not show the Izu/Ogasawara Islands. I was
1584:
When the prefectural symbol was at the top and the map was at the bottom, I was strongly in favor of putting an image at the top. It was pretty boring to see a B/W pref. symbol which was the first thing the eye looks at on the page. However, after the map was switched to the top (and symbol to the
1199:
Favor above the infobox. The photo doesn't have to represent an entire prefecture, although there are things that first come to mind when you think of a prefecture. (Aomori = apples/Nebuta; Kyoto = giesha/temples; Tokyo = Imperial Palace; etc.) It should be an image that would draw interest to the
246:
Do you not like templates? I view one reason to convert to a template is to make the article text more readable (the ugly table stuff goes in the template rather than right in the article). In addition, it makes it easy to change the format for all articles using the template. I don't much care
1869:
proposal for an appreciation week to end on
Knowledge Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who
1850:
are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please
1741:
P.S. Try and write another prefecture article and put the image at the top. Sooner or later someone will come along and push it down. It happened to me twice. They are not aware of this poll either. How about inserting the image within the map? There is space on the upper left corner for a small
293:
how the table would be rendered and how to fill parameters out correctly. With built-in infoboxs, the layout is up to systems (meaning the user preference, for example, can say about layouts) and you only need to know how to write an infobox in general, without knowing a name of the parametrized
284:
If you don't mind, allow me to elaborate this further :) I think you are missing the point of wiki, that is, in my opinion, the users' little need for learning. I guess the ideal solution, in my opinion, is simply to have a built-in infobox feature like categories or templates. As a long-time
1372:
and I voted ("tallies" below). I'll switch the map and symbol in the prefecture template (a unanimous decision!). As for prefecture photo placement and adding towns/villages to the prefecture navigational templates, since no one else voted I assume this means "do whatever you'd like". --
1605:
The map I have in mind would show city-town-village outlines, and if it makes sense at that scale, outlines of the 23 special wards. Prefectural boundaries and names of adjacent prefectures, Tokyo Bay, not much more. A bold, clear, uncluttered graphic. Does anyone know of such a map?
1503:
I don't quite agree with having everything being uniform. It doesn't matter to me if other prefecture articles had pics at the top, but Tokyo is DIFFERENT than the other prefecture because it is thought of as a city by the general world population. Therefore, Tokyo would fall under
1712:), I'm on the "image below" side but reasonably close to neutral on this. My concern is the "representativeness" of the image. I think I'll officially abstain from this poll. If the result requires any change to the template I'll be glad to help make any necessary changes. --
1541:
is much more famous. So is the
Imperial Palace. (Of course, if you were living here, you would probably know this.) Perhaps you should conduct a parallel poll asking what picture would be most appropriate to show at the top. (If anybody votes, that is. We did this before.)
1784:
By not conforming to the other world cities, it will help more people realize that Tokyo is actually not a city. That it is not just an urban area. After all, the little islands way out in the
Pacific Ocean can be called "Tokyo." A picture of people whale-watching off the
266:
Well, in general I don't like to see wikipeida becomes more programable and programmed. The use of templates makes things clear but I am not certain it is easy for newbies to understand what is going on. Anyway, this is my preference and I don't intend to push it.
1644:
You have to be able to read the kanji for the prefecture, then click on the "Chizu o kaku" button. A nice big (but blank) map appears. Most of the prefecture maps are probably outdated due to mergers. It also seems that this is where the map of Japan came from.
285:
contributor, I know the days we used to do those things by hand and the result wasn't pretty. The situation in tables seems analogous to me. The templates should be used to put shared contents among articles, like ones I am putting city articles (e.g.,
1727:
As I stated below, I would be in favor of top placement only if it is allowed for ALL prefecture articles. There are still too many people who are against this (both in
English and Japanese). Tokyo should not be an exception among the 47 prefectures.
1559:
who both don't like the image at the top). Since more people know you than they know me, if you start it, I'll back you up. I still don't understand why it was decided that a top image is okay for cities/wards but not okay for prefectures/states.
1125:. I like the current one, short, simple, and clean. Listing all the towns and villages in a prefecture would be like listing all the towns and villages in a US State; there's just far too many of them. Stick to major cities, and the districts.
1214:
Top-right placement of infobox is a nearly wikipedia-wide standard. I don't think a single photograph can adequately represent an entire prefecture, and is not "basic information" about a prefecture (so doesn't belong in the infobox). --
403:
Yes, I find the navoboxes useful. I favor putting all cities, districts, towns, and villages in the navobox. And put the navobox at the bottom of the page for all cities, wards, districts, towns, and villages in the prefecture.
1874:
where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.
1707:
wanted to add pictures to each prefecture. I'm somewhat suprised he's on the "image below infobox" side in this case (is it the specific image you're really objecting to?). As I've indicated before (at least in e-mail with
1550:
As we expected, your poll won't go anywhere. I suggest that you instead start a widespread campaign among
Wikipedians to allow an image to be placed at the top of the Infobox for all prefectures (don't forget to tell
1481:, while technically not a city, is often thought of as a city by people in other parts of the world. In city articles, a picture of or containing the most famous monument or image is usually first in the city article.
413:
Include towns and villages in the navboxes, too? I'm not necessariy opposed to this, but I'm concerned about how large the navboxes might need to be if this information is included. Potential alternatives (for
234:
That looks fine. The table is clean and looks better than the previous one. One thought is you might to want to name the template "infobox_Japanese_prefecture" or something or don't use the template at all. --
1536:
I don't think you should go as far as to specify which picture to show at the top. Not many people like Tokyo Tower (it's not beautiful) and Zojiji is certainly not a temple which people associate with Tokyo.
1576:, this can't be done without first getting consensus about the nature of the survey. We could (should?) expand this to the general issue of "pictures at the top of perfecture/state" articles. Comments? --
1626:
Thanks, I must have seen it there. It is only about 175 pixels wide. Probably 250 or 300 would be good for the article, and the underlying file at 750 or 1000, would be best. Any opinions from anyone?
418:) below. If we do this, I think we should indicate the district for each town/village, which I think has the possibility of moving these navboxes into the category of the "massive eyesores""
367:
At the top of the box, I'd like to see a photo of the prefecture instead of the pref. symbol or map. Can you make it so that we can add a photo at the top of the box above the pref. symbol?
1797:
Using your own words in your previous note: "I don't quite agree with having everything being uniform." That settles it then. The Tokyo article need not conform to the other world cities.
21:
1183:
would like to include towns and villages in the prefecture navigation templates (see above). Please indicate your preferences in the appropriate subsections below, by March 7. --
1695:
the "normal" usage of the existing template. In fact, I went to some trouble to do this so that use of the template didn't really change the appearance of the article. Compare
138:, but this can change in the future if there are enough articles about mountains etc. I hope this scheme is appropriate. Let me know if you prefer a different categorization --
423:
1492:
No, I don't think so. If Tokyo can have an image at the top, then it should be allowed for all prefectures which is what I originally proposed, but no one voted for it.
1438:
I don't object. It might be worth noting, however, that prefectures and districts are official governments and government-established entities, whereas regions are not.
1286:
In favor of this in some compact format. The number of towns and districts will continue to decrease as they merge. I favor this only if there's someone willing do it.
1137:
I just removed the towns that have already merged. I think the total number of towns is now manageable. If anything, I think we should have towns and villages but
1838:, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding
162:+newline gives consistent single spacing - indenting the HTML is being treated as fixed formatting, with visible dotted boxes and some tables came out very wide.
395:). Are there others who have opinions on these templates? Please chime in. I believe both Taku and I are quite interested in more feedback. Thanks. --
1890:
186:
prefecture, but I didn't realize you had already standardized on uppercase. I was under the impression you were all going to standardize on that because
1602:
distinguish a city/ward (e.g. Shinjuku, Shibuya) from a place (e.g. Ginza, Ueno). The prefectural boundaries are there, but they're a devil to follow.
78:
Can I apply this format now since no one seems to show any objection so far? I would like to put a list of districts and cities to each prefecture. --
1871:
226:
to use it. Before converting the rest of the prefecture articles I thought I'd solicit comments. Any objections or suggestions for improvements? --
1762:
03:51, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) - I am trying to keep a city convention of having a picture of the most famous monument first (e.g. Eiffel Tower for Paris)
1703:. As far as I can tell (from the prior poll, above) no one really cares whether there's a picture at the top of the infobox or not. In that poll,
1831:
1150:
Since this debate is old and there was no overwhelming preference for any single option, I went ahead and implemented the top alternate version.
469:
1756:
In favor of placing an image (including but not limited to the Tokyo Tower/Zozoji image) before the infobox or as the top part of the infobox:
1451:
I'm hoping someone here might be able to relieve the pressure on the biggest of the geography stub categories a little. There are now almost
1282:
Please indicate whether you prefer flat alphabetical list or some format (not necessarily the one shown above) indicating district as well.
691:
1902:
1879:
1855:
1847:
1843:
1348:
1154:
1145:
1129:
1368:
It is now at least March 8 everywhere in the world, so voting is closed. I guess the clear winner is officially apathy since only
294:
template and its syntax. Of course, maybe leaning about templates is not big deal. Again this is nothing more than my 2 cents. --
1839:
51:
17:
459:
1243:
These are geography articles. Showing the location of the prefecture seems like the most important information to convey. --
1693:
Not without changing the template. The alt text for the map is generated by the template as "Map of Japan with <name: -->
1456:
307:
I absolutely agree the point of wiki is minimal learning. The problem as I see it is that formatting control (and I see the
121:
515:
289:) In some sense, creating a parametrized template is equivalent to inventing new language; for each template, you have to
271:
are so many templates in use at this point that anyone who is at all curious will figure out how they basically work). --
100:
116:
1505:
345:
That sounds fine too. Again, now I found that seemingly there is no standard naming. Any name is fine to me, anyway. --
126:
1573:
894:
722:
437:
42:
248:
1569:
1046:
991:
810:
798:
649:
637:
487:
158:
The table format seemed to give trouble with the new Wiki software - - in the Area and Population bits, newline+
1459:. Any help in reducing this by enlarging some of the articles to non-stub status would be greatly appreciated!
1063:
814:
625:
355:
I've converted a few more prefectures to use the template (BTW - I'd appreciate any comments, especially from
324:
135:
111:
1802:
You know, this minor matter is not even worth arguing about (we talked about it before). But if you insist...
1556:
940:
768:
1171:
would like each prefecture article to include a photograph above the infobox (on the right), see for example
1025:
806:
608:
328:
1852:
1898:
1380:
Or it means "either way is fine." But I'll go with the status quo. Thanks for the time and effort Rick.
1835:
1167:
There are a couple of proposed changes that may be controversial and IMO are worth a community vote.
1141:
districts, as districts are mostly meaningless in terms of "places to go," "where people live," etc.
419:
327:
so I was under an impression that it is a standard naming practice. But then I realized that there is
1080:
1008:
818:
802:
673:
661:
497:
207:
195:
187:
1866:
1431:
1326:
1297:
1261:
1230:
1116:
999:
970:
840:
794:
642:
591:
452:
426:. Note that Ehime has relatively few towns/villages (I think more typical might be about 40). --
218:
I've created a template for the table (based on the template used for US states) and have changed
1876:
1636:
Here's the Web page where you can generate maps of municipal boundaries for all the prefectures:
143:
1827:
1803:
1786:
1772:
1743:
1729:
1709:
1704:
1646:
1616:
1586:
1561:
1543:
1519:
1493:
1381:
1369:
1287:
1251:
1201:
1180:
1168:
1104:
952:
780:
560:
405:
380:
368:
356:
346:
332:
295:
252:
236:
166:
79:
1894:
1810:
1759:
1687:
1526:
1509:
1485:
1388:
1172:
920:
887:
748:
715:
473:
415:
223:
219:
104:
1889:
I am hoping that this will someday became an all out WikiProject, but for now we have the
1713:
1680:
1577:
1374:
1341:
1311:
1244:
1226:
1216:
1184:
1088:
864:
666:
427:
396:
383:
and I have created templates for navoboxes for some of the prefectures. See for example,
360:
339:
313:
272:
256:
227:
203:
191:
932:
760:
550:
424:
Knowledge talk:Categories, lists, and series boxes#Series boxes / navigational templates
190:
is all lowercase still (bypassing the usefulness of the links in the first place...) --
1345:
1126:
1037:
948:
944:
924:
912:
852:
776:
772:
752:
740:
618:
570:
565:
530:
445:
388:
384:
87:
1742:
image. That is, if you can find a good image. But that map will have to be replaced.
1552:
1460:
1033:
1016:
978:
848:
844:
832:
678:
613:
596:
545:
139:
1484:
A separate convention should be established for Tokyo because of its unique nature.
1310:
I think adding towns/villages will make many of the templates excessively large. --
1071:
1054:
936:
860:
856:
764:
654:
555:
286:
702:
With towns and villages without indicating district (we'd presumably sort them):
1477:
Hi. I do not mind the normal status quo in terms of picture placement. However,
982:
836:
601:
50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1686:
Isn't it possible to have two pics in the infobox, with the map on the bottom?
1654:
1151:
1142:
928:
916:
756:
744:
575:
535:
331:
and a case in US state so we cannot be certain about naming, I suppose :) --
1639:
1615:
planning to look into this, but if anybody else wants to do it, be my guest.
1775:
20:35, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) - I oppose top placement for the following reasons:
1305:
Favor leaving navigational templates as they are (with cities and districts)
505:
482:
1200:
prefecture and entice people to scroll down and read the rest of the page.
134:
All other topics (i.e. airports, mountains, etc..) are currently under the
1865:
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of
1658:
1627:
1607:
1439:
1355:
Favor deleting districts from navigational templates, leaving only cities
392:
1675:
The template currently used allows a picture to be in the infobox, see
1538:
1429:
any objections to move regions from Somename region to Somename Region?
1175:- an alternative is to include a photo in the infobox, see for example
540:
1809:
I changed the poll around so that any image may be placed at the top.
1115:
Cities, then district sorted towns is clean, clear, and fairly short.
1465:
99:
I have started putting the prefectures in the Category scheme under
1598:
1478:
1394:
1176:
630:
185:
I apologize for moving the some of the ] articles to <foo: -->
1179:. I think we should switch the symbol and map in the infobox.
874:
With towns and villages, indicating district (one possibility):
441:
29:
1657:, also asking for comments there. Thanks again for the link!
1195:
Please indicate in your vote whether you prefer above or in.
1163:
Vote on picture placement and symbol/map placement in infobox
1278:
Favor adding towns and villages to navigational templates
1700:
1696:
1676:
1403:
Leave navigational templates with cities/districts: 1/2
1269:
Oppose switching prefecture symbol and map in infobox
255:. Are there other templates named "infobox xxx"? --
1238:
Favor switching prefecture symbol and map in infobox
1296:, and willing to do Miyagi, at least, if not more.
584:
523:
496:
1405:Make navigational templates only have cities: 0/2
1209:Oppose adding a photograph above or in the infobox
247:what the name of the template is, I created it as
1769:In favor of placing the image below the infobox:
1401:Add towns/villages to navigational templates: 1/2
1191:Favor adding a photograph above or in the infobox
165:I am working through correcting these defects. --
1653:I drew a map using that link and posted it in
1508:and therefore should have its own standards.
453:
8:
1321:Not at the rate towns are merging nowaways.(
338:How about "Japanese prefecture infobox"? --
1891:Knowledge:WikiProject Japan/Tokyo taskforce
160:seemed to give double spacing (sometimes).
1671:infobox or as the top part of an infobox)
1640:http://aoki2.si.gunma-u.ac.jp/map/map.html
1447:Cry for help from stub-sorting WikiProject
876:
704:
460:
446:
438:
1872:User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week
959:
905:
1893:- This will focus on Tokyo Metropolis.
1832:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Directory
107:is almost completed with the sections:
122:Category:Districts in Aichi prefecture
48:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
86:Yeah I think its time to start :) --
692:List of mergers in Ehime Prefecture
117:Category:Cities in Aichi prefecture
1666:Poll for image placement for Tokyo
1518:OK, why don't you conduct a poll?
1473:Picture placement in Tokyo article
202:All fixed back to capital P... --
127:Category:Towns in Aichi prefecture
28:
1464:
893:
721:
514:
468:
33:
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Japan
1572:might be useful. According to
1457:Category:Japan geography stubs
1409:Naming of subnational entities
1387:Add photo above infobox (like
1:
1880:20:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
1568:Perhaps announcing this as a
965:
101:Category:Prefectures of Japan
1856:15:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
1506:Knowledge:WikiProject Cities
885:
825:
787:
733:
713:
249:template:Japanese prefecture
1903:22:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
1574:Knowledge:Survey_guidelines
1393:Add photo in infobox (like
1078:
1061:
1044:
1023:
1006:
989:
968:
1918:
1610:03:33, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
1399:Switch symbol and map: 2/2
335:15:29, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
181:Mistake moving articles...
1830:has recently updated the
1806:20:35, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1690:23:15, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1683:16:13, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1661:01:21, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
1649:16:23, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1630:05:49, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
1589:02:01, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1564:02:35, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1529:03:48, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1522:00:05, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1488:03:00, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1469:01:39, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1442:01:44, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
1384:07:46, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1187:01:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
910:
689:
512:
480:
363:01:00, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
349:04:43, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
323:Second, I saw names like
298:04:43, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
239:18:08, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
230:17:08, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
136:Category:Aichi prefecture
112:Category:Aichi prefecture
1885:Tokyo task force started
1813:23:13, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1746:03:04, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1732:02:24, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1716:00:47, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1619:04:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1580:03:58, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1546:04:31, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1512:22:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1496:04:50, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1434:22:18, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1377:15:19, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1314:01:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1290:04:04, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1254:04:04, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1247:01:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1219:01:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1204:04:04, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1155:15:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
1146:07:08, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
1107:23:13, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
430:20:06, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
408:02:40, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
399:19:29, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
371:02:34, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
342:18:08, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
325:template:infobox_Company
316:17:20, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
275:18:08, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
259:18:56, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
198:21:03, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
169:10:45, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
146:14:18, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
82:00:14 Apr 5, 2003 (UTC)
1525:Then I will do that :)
1349:20:29, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
1329:01:41, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1300:01:42, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1264:01:40, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1233:01:39, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1130:20:24, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
1119:01:36, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
90:00:34 Apr 5, 2003 (UTC)
329:template:Japan_infobox
214:template for the table
22:Prefectures task force
1701:post-template version
175:{{SampleWikiProject}}
46:of past discussions.
1861:Knowledge Day Awards
1697:pre-template version
1655:Talk:Tokyo#Tokyo map
1417:refecture, Somename
376:Prefecture navoboxes
1828:WikiProject Council
1679:of the article. --
1423:lowercase Somename
1413:uppercase Somename
960:Towns and villages
826:Towns and villages
1250:In favor of this.
1047:Minamiuwa District
992:Kamiukena District
650:Minamiuwa District
638:Kamiukena District
1822:Project directory
1787:Ogasawara Islands
1099:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1091:
1084:
1074:
1067:
1064:Nishiuwa District
1057:
1050:
1040:
1029:
1019:
1012:
1002:
995:
985:
974:
955:
901:
900:
871:
870:
867:
821:
783:
729:
728:
698:
697:
626:Nishiuwa District
491:
422:rails against at
253:template:US state
71:
70:
58:
57:
52:current talk page
1909:
1836:User:B2T2/Portal
1752:Here is a poll:
1557:Manuel Anastácio
1468:
1364:Summary of votes
1173:Shiga Prefecture
1087:
1079:
1070:
1062:
1053:
1045:
1032:
1026:Kitauwa District
1024:
1015:
1007:
998:
990:
977:
969:
966:
911:
897:
888:Ehime Prefecture
881:
880:
877:
831:
793:
739:
725:
716:Ehime Prefecture
709:
708:
705:
609:Kitauwa District
518:
485:
474:Ehime Prefecture
472:
462:
455:
448:
439:
416:Ehime Prefecture
224:Akita Prefecture
220:Aichi Prefecture
177:
176:
105:Aichi prefecture
67:
60:
59:
37:
36:
30:
1917:
1916:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1887:
1863:
1824:
1668:
1595:
1475:
1449:
1411:
1366:
1357:
1307:
1280:
1271:
1240:
1211:
1193:
1165:
699:
694:
685:
580:
519:
510:
492:
476:
466:
435:Curent navbox:
378:
216:
183:
174:
173:
156:
97:
76:
63:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1915:
1913:
1886:
1883:
1862:
1859:
1823:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1799:
1798:
1795:
1791:
1782:
1777:
1776:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1667:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1621:
1620:
1594:
1591:
1582:
1581:
1548:
1547:
1534:
1533:Re: Your poll.
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1498:
1497:
1474:
1471:
1448:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1432:Tobias Conradi
1430:
1428:
1422:
1410:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1400:
1398:
1392:
1365:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1356:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1327:William McDuff
1316:
1315:
1306:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1298:William McDuff
1291:
1279:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1262:William McDuff
1255:
1248:
1239:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1231:William McDuff
1220:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1192:
1189:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1132:
1120:
1117:William McDuff
1109:
1108:
1097:
1096:
1093:
1092:
1085:
1076:
1075:
1068:
1059:
1058:
1051:
1042:
1041:
1030:
1021:
1020:
1013:
1004:
1003:
996:
987:
986:
975:
962:
961:
957:
956:
908:
907:
903:
902:
899:
898:
891:
884:
872:
869:
868:
828:
827:
823:
822:
790:
789:
785:
784:
736:
735:
731:
730:
727:
726:
719:
712:
700:
696:
695:
690:
687:
686:
684:
683:
682:
681:
671:
670:
669:
659:
658:
657:
647:
646:
645:
635:
634:
633:
623:
622:
621:
616:
606:
605:
604:
599:
588:
586:
582:
581:
579:
578:
573:
568:
563:
558:
553:
548:
543:
538:
533:
527:
525:
521:
520:
513:
511:
509:
508:
502:
500:
494:
493:
481:
478:
477:
467:
465:
464:
457:
450:
442:
433:
432:
431:
410:
409:
389:Template:Hyogo
385:Template:Akita
377:
374:
373:
372:
353:
352:
351:
350:
343:
320:
319:
318:
317:
302:
301:
300:
299:
279:
278:
277:
276:
263:
262:
261:
260:
241:
240:
215:
212:
211:
210:
188:Template:Japan
182:
179:
171:
161:
159:
155:
152:
151:
149:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
96:
93:
92:
91:
75:
72:
69:
68:
56:
55:
38:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1914:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1884:
1882:
1881:
1878:
1877:Badbilltucker
1873:
1868:
1860:
1858:
1857:
1854:
1849:
1848:collaboration
1845:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1821:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1783:
1779:
1778:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1768:
1767:
1761:
1758:
1757:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1745:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1731:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1715:
1711:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1689:
1685:
1684:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1665:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1648:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1629:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1618:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1609:
1603:
1600:
1592:
1590:
1588:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1563:
1558:
1554:
1545:
1540:
1535:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1528:
1523:
1521:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1487:
1482:
1480:
1472:
1470:
1467:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1446:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1433:
1426:
1420:
1416:
1408:
1406:
1396:
1390:
1385:
1383:
1378:
1376:
1371:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1334:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1304:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1277:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1263:
1259:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1218:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1190:
1188:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1162:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1101:
1100:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:Ochi District
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:Kita District
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
967:
964:
963:
958:
954:
950:
946:
942:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
909:
904:
896:
892:
890:
889:
883:
882:
879:
878:
875:
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
829:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
792:
791:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
737:
732:
724:
720:
718:
717:
711:
710:
707:
706:
703:
693:
688:
680:
677:
676:
675:
674:Kita District
672:
668:
665:
664:
663:
662:Ochi District
660:
656:
653:
652:
651:
648:
644:
641:
640:
639:
636:
632:
629:
628:
627:
624:
620:
617:
615:
612:
611:
610:
607:
603:
600:
598:
595:
594:
593:
590:
589:
587:
583:
577:
574:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
532:
529:
528:
526:
522:
517:
507:
504:
503:
501:
499:
495:
489:
484:
479:
475:
471:
463:
458:
456:
451:
449:
444:
443:
440:
436:
429:
425:
421:
417:
412:
411:
407:
402:
401:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
375:
370:
366:
365:
364:
362:
358:
348:
344:
341:
337:
336:
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:
315:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
297:
292:
288:
283:
282:
281:
280:
274:
269:
268:
265:
264:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
233:
232:
231:
229:
225:
221:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
197:
193:
189:
180:
178:
170:
168:
163:
153:
150:
147:
145:
141:
137:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
114:
113:
110:
109:
108:
106:
102:
94:
89:
85:
84:
83:
81:
74:Apply format?
73:
66:
62:
61:
53:
49:
45:
44:
39:
32:
31:
23:
19:
1888:
1864:
1825:
1804:Photojpn.org
1773:Photojpn.org
1751:
1744:Photojpn.org
1730:Photojpn.org
1710:Photojpn.org
1705:Photojpn.org
1677:this version
1669:
1647:Photojpn.org
1643:
1638:
1635:
1617:Photojpn.org
1604:
1596:
1587:Photojpn.org
1583:
1562:Photojpn.org
1549:
1544:Photojpn.org
1524:
1520:Photojpn.org
1517:
1494:Photojpn.org
1483:
1476:
1455:articles in
1452:
1450:
1424:
1418:
1414:
1412:
1386:
1382:Photojpn.org
1379:
1370:Photojpn.org
1367:
1337:
1322:
1293:
1288:Photojpn.org
1281:
1257:
1252:Photojpn.org
1229:assessment.
1227:Rick Block's
1222:
1202:Photojpn.org
1194:
1181:Photojpn.org
1169:Photojpn.org
1166:
1138:
1134:
1123:Vote Current
1122:
1112:
1105:Photojpn.org
971:Iyo District
923:(capital) |
886:
873:
751:(capital) |
714:
701:
592:Iyo District
434:
406:Photojpn.org
379:
369:Photojpn.org
354:
308:
290:
287:Akita, Akita
251:to parallel
217:
184:
172:
167:Keith Edkins
164:
157:
154:Table format
148:
133:
98:
77:
64:
47:
41:
1895:WhisperToMe
1867:Esperanza's
1844:peer review
1826:Hello. The
1811:WhisperToMe
1760:WhisperToMe
1688:WhisperToMe
1527:WhisperToMe
1510:WhisperToMe
1486:WhisperToMe
1113:Vote bottom
941:ShikokuchÅ«Å
769:ShikokuchÅ«Å
561:ShikokuchÅ«Å
420:Snowspinner
40:This is an
1840:assessment
1714:Rick Block
1681:Rick Block
1593:Tokyo map?
1578:Rick Block
1375:Rick Block
1342:Rick Block
1312:Rick Block
1245:Rick Block
1217:Rick Block
1185:Rick Block
953:Yawatahama
788:Districts
781:Yawatahama
576:Yawatahama
428:Rick Block
397:Rick Block
361:Rick Block
340:Rick Block
314:Rick Block
309:table-ness
273:Rick Block
257:Rick Block
228:Rick Block
204:EmperorBMA
192:EmperorBMA
95:Categories
1346:LordAmeth
1127:LordAmeth
1000:KumakÅgen
921:Matsuyama
841:KumakÅgen
811:Minamiuwa
799:Kamiukena
749:Matsuyama
643:KumakÅgen
585:Districts
506:Matsuyama
498:Core city
483:Matsuyama
88:synthetik
65:Archive 1
1553:Jpatokal
1461:Grutness
1323:Disagree
1135:Vote top
1089:Kamijima
865:Kamijima
815:Nishiuwa
667:Kamijima
393:Colorado
140:Chris 73
20: |
1539:Sensoji
1421:istrict
1038:Matsuno
949:Uwajima
925:Niihama
913:Imabari
906:Cities
853:Matsuno
807:Kitauwa
777:Uwajima
753:Niihama
741:Imabari
734:Cities
619:Matsuno
571:Uwajima
541:Niihama
531:Imabari
488:capital
43:archive
1846:, and
1570:survey
1397:): 0/2
1391:): 1/2
1258:Agreed
1034:Kihoku
1017:Uchiko
979:Masaki
849:Kihoku
845:Uchiko
833:Masaki
679:Uchiko
614:Kihoku
597:Masaki
524:Cities
103:. The
1699:with
1599:Tokyo
1479:Tokyo
1427:egion
1395:Tokyo
1389:Shiga
1340:with
1338:agree
1294:Agree
1225:with
1223:Agree
1177:Tokyo
1152:Amake
1143:Amake
1072:Ikata
1055:Ainan
937:Seiyo
933:SaijÅ
861:Ikata
857:Ainan
765:Seiyo
761:SaijÅ
655:Ainan
631:Ikata
556:Seiyo
551:SaijÅ
291:learn
16:<
1899:talk
1853:B2T2
1597:The
1555:and
1453:4000
983:Tobe
945:TÅon
837:Tobe
819:Ochi
803:Kita
773:TÅon
602:Tobe
566:TÅon
387:and
381:Taku
357:Taku
347:Taku
333:Taku
296:Taku
237:Taku
222:and
144:Talk
80:Taku
1659:Fg2
1628:Fg2
1608:Fg2
1440:Fg2
1139:not
929:Ozu
917:Iyo
795:Iyo
757:Ozu
745:Iyo
546:Åzu
536:Iyo
1901:)
1842:,
1463:|
1344:.
1336:I
1036:|
981:|
951:|
947:|
943:|
939:|
935:|
931:|
927:|
919:|
915:|
863:|
859:|
855:|
851:|
847:|
843:|
839:|
835:|
817:|
813:|
809:|
805:|
801:|
797:|
779:|
775:|
771:|
767:|
763:|
759:|
755:|
747:|
743:|
208:話ã
196:話ã
142:|
1897:(
1425:r
1419:D
1415:P
1325:)
1260:.
1083::
1066::
1049::
1028::
1011::
994::
973::
490:)
486:(
461:e
454:t
447:v
206:|
194:|
54:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.