38:
146:
110:
President of the
Republic of South Africa and Another v Women's Legal Centre Trust and Others; Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Faro and Others; Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v Esau and
460:
450:
269:
228:
330:
455:
409:"Judicial Intervention in Facilitating Legal Recognition (and Regulation) of Muslim Family Law in Muslim-Minority Countries: The Case of South Africa"
264:
20:
445:
465:
356:
117:
212:
48:
123:
Women's Legal Centre Trust v
President of the Republic of South Africa and Others; Faro v Bignham N.O. and Others; Esau v Esau and Others
223:
and
Divorce Act, 1979 were unconstitutional insofar as they failed to recognise and regulate marriages solemnised in accordance with
220:
408:
290:"A Brief Analysis of the Judgment in Women's Legal Centre Trust v President of the Republic of South Africa 2022 5 SA 323 (CC)"
232:
129:
259:
247:
382:
243:
37:
133:
311:
420:
306:
301:
173:
216:
169:
125:
439:
236:
185:
181:
113:
177:
150:
91:
227:
and not registered as civil marriages. This failure was inconsistent with various
59:
Women's Legal Centre Trust v
President of the Republic of South Africa and Others
208:
Women's Legal Centre Trust v
President of the Republic of South Africa and Others
147:
Women's Legal Centre Trust v
President of the Republic of South Africa and Others
289:
165:
315:
425:
224:
235:. The judgment was unanimous and was written by Acting Justice
357:"ConCourt confirms order recognising Muslim marriages"
196:
191:
161:
156:
141:
103:
98:
87:
79:
64:
54:
44:
30:
288:Abduroaf, Muneer; Moosa, Najma (31 October 2023).
383:"Analysis of the Women's Legal Centre Trust case"
331:"Marriages under Islamic law given legal status"
270:Section Nine of the Constitution of South Africa
215:concerning the legal status and regulation of
219:. The Constitutional Court declared that the
94:; 2022 (5) SA 323 (CC); 2023 (1) BCLR 80 (CC)
8:
19:For the 2009 decision of the same name, see
461:South African anti-discrimination case law
451:Constitutional Court of South Africa cases
36:
31:Women's Legal Centre Trust v President
27:
424:
305:
265:Constitutional litigation in South Africa
280:
21:Women's Legal Centre Trust v President
7:
355:Chabalala, Jeanette (28 June 2022).
294:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
231:in sections 9, 10, 28 and 34 of the
213:Constitutional Court of South Africa
49:Constitutional Court of South Africa
307:10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a14595
14:
381:Abduroaf, Muneer (30 June 2020).
329:Broughton, Tania (29 June 2022).
456:South African administrative law
246:, where it was decided by Judge
446:2022 in South African case law
1:
466:South African family case law
233:Constitution of South Africa
184:, Madondo AJ, Pillay AJ and
242:The case originated in the
482:
211:is a 2022 decision of the
130:High Court of South Africa
18:
126:[2018] ZAWCHC 109
35:
260:South African family law
248:Nolwazi Mabindla-Boqwana
114:[2020] ZASCA 177
16:South African legal case
407:Amien, Waheeda (2020).
244:Western Cape High Court
200:Tlaletsi AJ (unanimous)
118:Supreme Court of Appeal
413:Journal of Islamic Law
151:[2009] ZACC 20
92:[2022] ZACC 23
68:28 June 2022
426:10.53484/JIL.V1.AMIEN
229:constitutional rights
134:Western Cape Division
221:Marriage Act, 1961
204:
203:
473:
431:
430:
428:
404:
398:
397:
395:
393:
378:
372:
371:
369:
367:
352:
346:
345:
343:
341:
326:
320:
319:
309:
285:
217:Muslim marriages
157:Court membership
75:
73:
40:
28:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
436:
435:
434:
406:
405:
401:
391:
389:
380:
379:
375:
365:
363:
354:
353:
349:
339:
337:
328:
327:
323:
287:
286:
282:
278:
256:
71:
69:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
469:
468:
463:
458:
453:
448:
438:
437:
433:
432:
399:
373:
347:
321:
279:
277:
274:
273:
272:
267:
262:
255:
252:
202:
201:
198:
194:
193:
189:
188:
163:
162:Judges sitting
159:
158:
154:
153:
143:
142:Related action
139:
138:
137:
136:
120:
105:
101:
100:
96:
95:
89:
85:
84:
81:
77:
76:
66:
62:
61:
56:
55:Full case name
52:
51:
46:
42:
41:
33:
32:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
447:
444:
443:
441:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
403:
400:
388:
384:
377:
374:
362:
358:
351:
348:
336:
335:GroundUp News
332:
325:
322:
317:
313:
308:
303:
299:
295:
291:
284:
281:
275:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
257:
253:
251:
249:
245:
240:
238:
237:Pule Tlaletsi
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
199:
195:
192:Case opinions
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
160:
155:
152:
149:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
127:
124:
121:
119:
115:
112:
108:
107:
106:
104:Prior actions
102:
97:
93:
90:
86:
82:
78:
67:
63:
60:
57:
53:
50:
47:
43:
39:
34:
29:
26:
22:
416:
412:
402:
390:. Retrieved
386:
376:
364:. Retrieved
360:
350:
338:. Retrieved
334:
324:
297:
293:
283:
241:
207:
206:
205:
145:
122:
109:
99:Case history
58:
25:
197:Decision by
186:Tlaletsi AJ
80:Docket nos.
440:Categories
392:7 February
366:7 February
340:7 February
276:References
174:Mhlantla J
166:Madlanga J
72:2022-06-28
316:1727-3781
170:Majiedt J
88:Citations
83:CCT 24/21
387:De Rebus
254:See also
182:Tshiqi J
178:Theron J
128:in the
116:in the
70: (
65:Decided
419:: 65.
361:News24
314:
225:sharia
111:Others
45:Court
394:2024
368:2024
342:2024
312:ISSN
421:doi
302:doi
442::
415:.
411:.
385:.
359:.
333:.
310:.
300:.
298:26
296:.
292:.
250:.
239:.
180:,
176:,
172:,
168:,
132:,
429:.
423::
417:1
396:.
370:.
344:.
318:.
304::
74:)
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
