Knowledge (XXG)

Young v Hunt

Source 📝

28: 141:
Consequently, the judge allowed the defendants counterclaim, although interesting enough, refused to make an award for costs on the novel basis that the defendant had been awarded here a large amount of money already.
134:
The court held that as the contract did not make it an essential stipulation that if the turnover was incorrect, that the contract be cancelled, the plaintiff was not legally entitled to cancel the contract.
110:
is a case that establishes in New Zealand case law that a contract can not simply be cancelled due to misrepresentation, unless that misrepresentation was a breach of an "essential" term of the contract.
138:
Holland J stated "The use of the world ‘essential’ in s 7(4)(a) of the Contractual Remedies Act must mean that the party would not proceed with the contract unless the representation were accurate".
126:
Young sought cancellation of the contract due to this misrepresentation, and the repayment of his deposit. Hunt countersued for the balance of the contract that remained unpaid.
123:
for $ 11,300. After only 8 weeks however, Young abandoned the premises on the grounds of misrepresentation, claiming that the turnover was overstated by the vendor by 5%.
166: 171: 176: 181: 38: 27: 160: 89: 120: 151: 74: 95: 85: 80: 70: 62: 54: 44: 34: 20: 75:http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/1983/108.pdf 49:Michael Francis James Young v Dawn Donna Hunt 8: 26: 17: 119:Hunt sold Young a coffee bar in Kaiapoi, 7: 14: 167:High Court of New Zealand cases 1: 172:New Zealand contract case law 198: 152:Link to full text of case 100: 39:High Court of New Zealand 25: 177:1983 in New Zealand law 108:Young v Hunt 2 NZLR 80 105: 104: 189: 182:1983 in case law 81:Court membership 58:22 November 1983 30: 18: 197: 196: 192: 191: 190: 188: 187: 186: 157: 156: 148: 132: 117: 12: 11: 5: 195: 193: 185: 184: 179: 174: 169: 159: 158: 155: 154: 147: 146:External links 144: 131: 128: 116: 113: 103: 102: 98: 97: 93: 92: 87: 83: 82: 78: 77: 72: 68: 67: 64: 60: 59: 56: 52: 51: 46: 45:Full case name 42: 41: 36: 32: 31: 23: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 194: 183: 180: 178: 175: 173: 170: 168: 165: 164: 162: 153: 150: 149: 145: 143: 139: 136: 129: 127: 124: 122: 114: 112: 109: 99: 94: 91: 88: 86:Judge sitting 84: 79: 76: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 50: 47: 43: 40: 37: 33: 29: 24: 19: 16: 140: 137: 133: 125: 121:Christchurch 118: 107: 106: 101:cancellation 48: 21:Young v Hunt 15: 161:Categories 115:Background 71:Transcript 90:Holland J 66:2 NZLR 80 96:Keywords 63:Citation 55:Decided 35:Court 130:Held 163::

Index


High Court of New Zealand
http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHC/1983/108.pdf
Holland J
Christchurch
Link to full text of case
Categories
High Court of New Zealand cases
New Zealand contract case law
1983 in New Zealand law
1983 in case law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.