84:
National
Register, although within the overall listing by the historic district, not separately. The Ozaukee County NRHP list-article is intended to list all of the separately listed ones, but not every contributing building within each of the historic districts. On a pic-taking trip once, I was very confused by plaques when looking for one house that was both separately listed and also included in a historic district. Many of the houses around it also had plaques, and i got diverted. If there is enough information available to write a full article, it can be okay to write a separate article about a contributing property like the Washington Inn one, but I think it is usually best, at least at first, to describe a place like that in a section within the larger historic district's article, which certainly should be developed to list all the major contributing properties. Going to the local library is probably a great way to get info to develop that article. They may have clippings files on historical sites, and they may have copies of the NRHP nomination documents (which you will find are very useful). Regards,
233:
articles. No better way to do it than just try things. Here, you are bumping into the policy/guidelines on notability of schools, which has been sorted out through a lot of practice and argument elsewhere, and which I understand basically is just as Winnow is stating: that any high school is deemed notable but lower schools are not (unless they are notable for some other reason, such as exceptional architecture or notable association with desegregation court cases or other reasons that might be documented in an NRHP listing). You could not know about the practices beforehand. So, as Winnow suggests, merging the primary school articles into an article on the district (with a section on each school) is probably the best option. Good luck!
28:, which i have no idea why is on my watchlist. Nice to see you adding pictures! I'm going to start a stub article for one of the places you added a picture for, just to show you what can easily be done for any NRHP-listed place using an NRHP infobox/article starter tool that you might want to try, yourself. I'll add in one of your pics, so watch at the list-article for a redlink turning blue. Anyhow, nice to see you getting into it. Regards,
478:
724:
496:, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Knowledge (XXG), has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page
156:. You would just enter "Cedarburg" and "WI" and it would give u a cut-and-paste ready output, filled out with the public domain National Register database fields filled out. Because its output differed in a couple places from what you put into the Cedarburg Mill infobox, i added some alternative information there which you may want to take a look at. Keep up the good work!
309:
98:
It looks like our interests intersect in several ways, Loopy! I love taking pictures of
Historic Places in Wisconsin! I used to live in Sheboygan and I used to go to southeast Wisconsin for work. Let me know if you need any help with historic places and/or Wisconsin topics! I have lots of experience.
276:
Thanks for merging the
Cedarburg Schools. I did some copyediting on the article because a lot of things were repeated after being copied from the separate articles. I removed a couple of See Also links because they were linked in the article and added an external link to the school district website.
51:
so I started that district article instead and added the Inn's picture there. The NRHP list-article is intended to show just the separately NRHP-listed properties and districts, and to display the
National Register database names for places, so I am going to reverse/revise some of your edits to the
354:
You're certainly improving the article, but providing sources for your additions would add a lot, and is one of the cornerstones of WP. Unfortunately, we can't easily do anything about the mass of unsourced material that's already there, but if you could try to remember to provide sources for your
232:
From the peanut gallery: Hey, Loopygrumpkins, please don't be discouraged by this. You seem to me to have been doing a great job getting started in wikipedia, including by not putting all your investment in just one area. It takes a while to learn the ropes, about what can happen when you start
437:
Okay-I just saw your reasons given on the
Freistadt, Wisconsin talk page-as I told Royalbroil-I am open to the Freistadt, Wisconsin article to be be recreated if there is some historical/cultural nobility and if Freistatdt not be consider an unincorporated community which it is not it is part of
83:
Got your note back. Glad you're available and interested to work on these
Ozaukee County NRHP articles. About the plaque, I've come to learn that every contributing property within a historic district is apparently entitled to put one of those plaques in front. They are, indeed, listed on the
400:
since they contained potentially defamatory statements about living persons. I talked to the anonymous editor on his/her talk page, trying to encourage the addition of sources so that the information could be included in some form, but the anon seems to have disappeared.
64:
is not, this seems like an obvious error to be corrected. I and other NRHP editors are collecting and reporting such errors to the
National Register, and I'll add this one to our error report list (and leave it as you corrected it in the Ozaukee list-article). Thanks!
404:
Would you be interested or able to deal with the district controversy on the article with sources? It seems from your user page that you are familiar with the area. I'd be happy to help out with the formatting of sources, if that's any concern. Thanks, and a belated
251:
What a quick response in creating the
Cedarburg School District article! Thanks! It looks like you also included info on the separate schools. I'll take a stab at the merging tomorrow, and then we'll see what things look like. Nice working with you.
52:
Ozaukee list-article. However, the
National Register database does have typos and other errors in it, so your attention to possible errors is appreciated. In particular I see that you changed "Moquon" to "Mequon" in the name of
25:
680:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
625:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
452:
If the
Freistadt article is brought back that will be fine. But Freistadt is not a unincorporated community but is a neighborhood of Mequon and should be mentioned as such and remain link somehow to the Mequon
738:
730:
422:
Hi-Freistadt is a neighborhood of Mequon not a unincorporated community so I revert this to Baron Larf. This was not your fault. The anon editor made the change with no reasons given-Thanks-
48:
586:
Your edit summary says that the image was downloaded from the Wisconsin Historical Society. How can I find this image there? What search terms should I use? Or did you take it yourself?
312:
Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article
558:
202:
say that elementary and middle schools are not considered notable, and therefore don't deserve their own articles. I asked for advice on the Cedarburg schools' articles on the
199:
183:
133:
from a fellow member! Glad to see Royalbroil chiming in. Loopygrumpkins, please feel free to post questions or comments at the NRHP wikiproject talk page (shortcut
99:
Any historic place that you can photograph in Wisconsin is a GREAT THING! I keep taking pictures as life takes me around the state during trips/travels/vacation.
497:
148:. I just edited a little within that, to clean up the image display and otherwise. I surmise that you created the NRHP infobox manually, rather than using the
210:
article or to combine them into an article on the Cedarburg School District. I think the second choice sounds like a good plan. What do you think? --
53:
392:
several months ago. In that time, an anonymous IP added unsourced, controversial statements regarding some events that took place at the school
492:
203:
752:
705:
650:
737:. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more
748:
701:
646:
317:
692:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
637:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
43:
I went to start an article on "Washington House Inn" but find that is in fact not NRHP-listed. I take it that it is a
697:
642:
191:
325:
195:
321:
580:
534:
389:
378:
187:
152:-supported "NRHP infobox generator" tool. You may want to try that for your next article, it is easy to use, at
329:
554:
365:
342:
287:
262:
220:
137:) and to announce any new NRHP articles you create in the new articles box on the wikiproject's main page (
693:
638:
134:
44:
61:
593:
531:
313:
207:
106:
669:
660:
614:
605:
409:
357:
334:
279:
254:
212:
689:
673:
634:
618:
553:
As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at
564:
512:
238:
161:
89:
70:
57:
33:
685:
677:
630:
622:
385:
138:
130:
688:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
681:
633:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
626:
477:
397:
56:, which I assume is your identifying that there is a typo in the National Register. Since
588:
101:
141:). Listing there tends to get you some helpful edits from other NRHP-interested editors.
406:
145:
734:
458:
443:
427:
733:, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the
723:
508:
234:
157:
85:
66:
29:
149:
756:
709:
654:
599:
574:
540:
516:
462:
447:
431:
412:
371:
348:
320:
for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of
293:
268:
242:
226:
165:
112:
93:
74:
37:
24:
Hey, like nature i hate a vacuum, so must jump in. I noticed your edits to
182:
I noticed that you created several pages for primary schools in Cedarburg:
153:
26:
National Register of Historic Places listings in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin
454:
439:
423:
308:
676:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
621:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
557:. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the
332:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
16:
This is my talk page. So yeah... talk away... (awkward silence)...
438:
Mequon and should remain link to the article about Mequon. Thanks-
384:
Hey Loopygrumpkins! Great job on all your edits and additions to
206:, and it was suggested to either merge those articles with the
715:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
476:
472:
418:
Freistadt is part of Mequon not a unincorporated community
49:
Washington Avenue Historic District (Cedarburg, Wisconsin)
526:
393:
144:
Also, I notice your nice new article with picture on
328:for information about how to cite sources and the
668:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
613:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
355:additions in the future, that would be great! --
277:It should be a little more streamlined now. --
388:-related articles. I noticed that you created
8:
469:Invitation to join WikiProject United States
396:. Those edits were clearly in violation of
54:Mequon Town Hall and Fire Station Complex
154:http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/infobox.php
729:You are invited to participate in the
200:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines
7:
14:
694:review the candidates' statements
639:review the candidates' statements
549:Your opinion would be appreciated
722:
307:
700:. For the Election committee,
670:Arbitration Committee election
661:ArbCom elections are now open!
645:. For the Election committee,
615:Arbitration Committee election
606:ArbCom elections are now open!
326:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources
1:
710:14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
655:14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
413:06:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
372:20:47, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
349:20:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
204:WikiProject Schools Talk Page
757:02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
696:and submit your choices on
641:and submit your choices on
517:03:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
192:Webster Transitional School
772:
749:MediaWiki message delivery
702:MediaWiki message delivery
647:MediaWiki message delivery
463:22:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
448:12:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
432:10:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
196:Westlawn Elementary School
184:Parkview Elementary School
600:05:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
581:File:Northerner wreck.jpg
575:06:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
541:13:45, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
493:WikiProject United States
390:Cedarburg School District
379:Cedarburg School District
294:14:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
269:02:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
243:22:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
227:14:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
188:Thorson Elementary School
166:11:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
113:01:41, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
94:22:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
75:03:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
38:03:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
555:List of sovereign states
299:History of Wisconsin -
559:Discussion of criteria
481:
674:Arbitration Committee
619:Arbitration Committee
480:
45:contributing property
527:Van Beethoven Ludwig
314:History of Wisconsin
678:arbitration process
623:arbitration process
522:Deaf to the tempest
690:arbitration policy
635:arbitration policy
482:
745:
744:
544:
505:
504:
364:
341:
324:. Take a look at
286:
261:
219:
178:Cedarburg schools
62:Moquon, Wisconsin
58:Mequon, Wisconsin
763:
731:50,000 Challenge
726:
719:
718:
596:
591:
572:
570:
567:
561:. Best regards,
539:
473:
368:
362:
360:
345:
339:
337:
316:, please cite a
311:
290:
284:
282:
265:
259:
257:
223:
217:
215:
129:Hey, welcome to
109:
104:
771:
770:
766:
765:
764:
762:
761:
760:
717:
698:the voting page
664:
643:the voting page
609:
594:
589:
584:
568:
565:
563:
551:
524:
500:. Thank you!!!
471:
453:article-Thanks-
420:
382:
366:
358:
343:
335:
318:reliable source
305:
303:provide sources
288:
280:
263:
255:
221:
213:
180:
107:
102:
22:
12:
11:
5:
769:
767:
743:
742:
727:
716:
713:
667:
663:
658:
612:
608:
603:
583:
578:
550:
547:
545:
523:
520:
503:
502:
488:Loopygrumpkins
483:
470:
467:
466:
465:
450:
419:
416:
381:
376:
375:
374:
304:
297:
274:
273:
272:
271:
246:
245:
179:
176:
175:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
146:Cedarburg Mill
142:
120:
119:
118:
117:
116:
115:
78:
77:
60:is a town and
21:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
768:
759:
758:
754:
750:
740:
736:
735:United States
732:
728:
725:
721:
720:
714:
712:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
662:
659:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
607:
604:
602:
601:
598:
597:
592:
582:
579:
577:
576:
573:
571:
560:
556:
548:
546:
542:
537:
536:
533:
528:
521:
519:
518:
514:
510:
501:
499:
495:
494:
489:
484:
479:
475:
474:
468:
464:
460:
456:
451:
449:
445:
441:
436:
435:
434:
433:
429:
425:
417:
415:
414:
411:
408:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
380:
377:
373:
370:
369:
361:
353:
352:
351:
350:
347:
346:
338:
331:
327:
323:
322:verifiability
319:
315:
310:
302:
298:
296:
295:
292:
291:
283:
270:
267:
266:
258:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
240:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
225:
224:
216:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
177:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
122:
121:
114:
111:
110:
105:
97:
96:
95:
91:
87:
82:
81:
80:
79:
76:
72:
68:
63:
59:
55:
50:
46:
42:
41:
40:
39:
35:
31:
27:
19:
17:
746:
665:
610:
587:
585:
562:
552:
530:
525:
506:
491:
487:
485:
421:
403:
383:
356:
333:
330:welcome page
306:
300:
278:
275:
253:
211:
181:
100:
23:
15:
150:User:Elkman
47:within the
686:topic bans
631:topic bans
535:Farmbrough
405:welcome!--
20:NRHP stuff
682:site bans
627:site bans
208:Cedarburg
509:Kumioko
486:Hello,
386:WP:WPWI
235:doncram
158:doncram
139:wp:NRHP
135:wt:NRHP
131:wp:NRHP
86:doncram
67:doncram
30:doncram
672:. The
617:. The
398:WP:BLP
367:Winnow
344:Winnow
301:Please
289:Winnow
264:Winnow
222:Winnow
194:, and
595:broil
590:Royal
566:Night
407:Baron
363:&
340:&
285:&
260:&
218:&
108:broil
103:Royal
753:talk
739:here
706:talk
651:talk
532:Rich
513:talk
498:here
459:talk
444:talk
428:talk
410:Larf
394:here
359:Sift
336:Sift
281:Sift
256:Sift
239:talk
214:Sift
162:talk
90:talk
71:talk
34:talk
666:Hi,
611:Hi,
529:?
490:!
455:RFD
440:RFD
424:RFD
755:)
747:--
741:!
708:)
684:,
653:)
629:,
538:,
515:)
507:--
461:)
446:)
430:)
252:--
241:)
198:.
190:,
186:,
164:)
92:)
73:)
36:)
751:(
704:(
649:(
569:w
543:.
511:(
457:(
442:(
426:(
237:(
160:(
88:(
69:(
32:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.