112:
doctors.) The negative outcome of such a design is that a doctor's number will be duplicated in the database if they have multiple patients, thus increasing both the chance of input error and the cost and risk of updating that number should it change (compared to a third normal form-compliant data model that only stores a doctor's number once on a doctor table).
694:
via query, reporting, and dashboards were often facilitated by a different type of data model that provided pre-calculated analysis such as trend lines, period-to-date calculations (month-to-date, quarter-to-date, year-to-date), cumulative calculations, basic statistics (average, standard deviation,
383:
attributes are dependent on keys. Prime attributes (which are keys or parts of keys) must not be functionally dependent at all; they each represent a fact about the key in the sense of providing part or all of the key itself. (This rule applies only to functionally dependent attributes, as applying
478:
The breach of 3NF occurs because the non-prime attribute (Winner's date of birth) is transitively dependent on the candidate key {Tournament, Year} through the non-prime attribute Winner. The fact that Winner's date of birth is functionally dependent on Winner makes the table vulnerable to logical
111:
A hypothetical example of a failure to meet third normal form would be a hospital database having a table of patients which included a column for the telephone number of their doctor. (The phone number is dependent on the doctor, rather than the patient, thus would be better stored in a table of
744:
Codd, E. F. "Further
Normalization of the Data Base Relational Model". (Presented at Courant Computer Science Symposia Series 6, "Data Base Systems", New York City, May 24–25, 1971.) IBM Research Report RJ909 (August 31, 1971). Republished in Randall J. Rustin (ed.),
661:(i.e. one where X does not contain A) and let A be a non-prime attribute. Also let Y be a candidate key of R. Then Y → X. Therefore, A is not transitively dependent on Y if there is a functional dependency X → Y iff X is a superkey of R.
345:
to give true evidence in a court of law, was given by Bill Kent: " non-key must provide a fact about the key, the whole key, and nothing but the key". A common variation supplements this definition with the oath "so help me
379:: "Each attribute must represent a fact about the key, the whole key, and nothing but the key." The 3NF version of the definition is weaker than Date's BCNF variation, as the former is concerned only with ensuring that
224:
A 3NF definition that is equivalent to Codd's, but expressed differently, was given by Carlo
Zaniolo in 1982. This definition states that a table is in 3NF if and only if for each of its functional dependencies
669:
Most 3NF tables are free of update, insertion, and deletion anomalies. Certain types of 3NF tables, rarely met with in practice, are affected by such anomalies; these are tables which either fall short of
361:; further requiring that non-key attributes be dependent on "nothing but the key" ensures 3NF. While this phrase is a useful mnemonic, the fact that it only mentions a single key means it defines some
602:
Update anomalies cannot occur in these tables, because unlike before, Winner is now a candidate key in the second table, thus allowing only one value for Date of birth for each Winner.
96:, except the case of functional dependency whose right hand side is a prime attribute (an attribute which is strictly included into some key) . Codd defined this as a relation in
657:
The definition of 3NF offered by Carlo
Zaniolo in 1982, and given above, can be shown to be equivalent to the Codd definition in the following way: Let X → A be a nontrivial
375:
refers to Kent's summary as "an intuitively attractive characterization" of 3NF and notes that with slight adaptation it may serve as a definition of the slightly stronger
1095:
649:
functional dependencies, then create a relation for every candidate key of the original relation which was not already a subset of a relation in the decomposition.
305:
To rephrase
Zaniolo's definition more simply, the relation is in 3NF if and only if for every non-trivial functional dependency X → Y, X is a superkey or
475:{Tournament, Year} is a minimal set of attributes guaranteed to uniquely identify a row. That is, {Tournament, Year} is a candidate key for the table.
1006:
890:
115:
Codd later realized that 3NF did not eliminate all undesirable data anomalies and developed a stronger version to address this in 1974, known as
828:
The author of a 1989 book on database management credits one of his students with coming up with the "so help me Codd" addendum. Diehr, George.
384:
it to all attributes would implicitly prohibit composite candidate keys, since each part of any such key would violate the "whole key" clause.)
690:
While 3NF was ideal for machine processing, the segmented nature of the data model can be difficult to intuitively consume by a human user.
1088:
1181:
1015:
630:, in the sense that every functional dependency on R can be derived from the functional dependencies that hold on the projections R
479:
inconsistencies, as there is nothing to stop the same person from being shown with different dates of birth on different records.
1236:
1081:
869:
313:
consists of prime attributes. Zaniolo's definition gives a clear sense of the difference between 3NF and the more stringent
933:
1201:
1145:
671:
376:
314:
116:
1139:
362:
1067:
1049:
627:
282:
1191:
1163:
1104:
716:
132:
128:
46:
471:
Because each row in the table needs to tell us who won a particular
Tournament in a particular Year, the
1186:
883:
707:. Hadley Wickham's "tidy data" framework is 3NF, with "the constraints framed in statistical language".
658:
611:
178:
174:
105:
89:
54:
482:
In order to express the same facts without violating 3NF, it is necessary to split the table into two:
1043:
789:
696:
372:
151:
77:
42:
610:
A relation can always be decomposed in third normal form, that is, the relation R is rewritten to
1151:
1127:
675:
358:
155:
97:
27:
Normalizing a database design to reduce the duplication of data and ensure referential integrity
1206:
1169:
1157:
1121:
1115:
1011:
982:
865:
679:
354:
85:
972:
81:
66:
1217:
1196:
854:
646:
639:
342:
58:
38:
793:
143:
1038:
695:
moving averages) and previous period comparisons (year ago, month ago, week ago) e.g.
1230:
472:
365:
to satisfy the 2nd and 3rd normal forms. Both 2NF and 3NF are concerned equally with
347:
298:
170:
101:
93:
62:
776:
Zaniolo, Carlo. "A New Normal Form for the Design of
Relational Database Schemata".
858:
704:
623:
50:
626:
is equal to the original relation. Further, this decomposition does not lose any
136:
986:
735:
Codd, E. F. "Further
Normalization of the Data Base Relational Model", p. 34.
691:
357:; requiring that non-key attributes be dependent on "the whole key" ensures
977:
341:
An approximation of Codd's definition of 3NF, paralleling the traditional
84:) is said to meet third normal form standards if all the attributes (e.g.
1073:
1061:
267:
161:
No non-prime attribute of R is transitively dependent on the primary key.
70:
960:
317:(BCNF). BCNF simply eliminates the third alternative ("Every element of
1023:
908:"Comparisons between Data Warehouse modelling techniques – Roelant Vos"
812:
700:
387:
An example of a table that fails to meet the requirements of 3NF is:
1055:
907:
674:(BCNF) or, if they meet BCNF, fall short of the higher normal forms
645:
To decompose a relation into 3NF from 2NF, break the table into the
813:"A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in Relational Database Theory"
17:
1024:
A Simple Guide to Five Normal Forms in
Relational Database Theory
862:
1077:
353:
Requiring existence of "the key" ensures that the table is in
747:
Data Base
Systems: Courant Computer Science Symposia Series 6
798:
699:
and beyond dimensional modeling, flattening of stars via
638:. What is more, such a decomposition can be computed in
1027:, Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, pp. 120–126
653:
Equivalence of the Codd and
Zaniolo definitions of 3NF
369:
candidate keys of a table and not just any one key.
49:
principles to reduce the duplication of data, avoid
861:: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
233:, at least one of the following conditions holds:
100:where all non-prime attributes depend only on the
169:of R is an attribute that does not belong to any
65:, an English computer scientist who invented the
1062:Description of the database normalization basics
686:Considerations for use in reporting environments
142:Codd's definition states that a table is in 3NF
1089:
8:
1096:
1082:
1074:
1050:An Introduction to Database Normalization
976:
845:(7th ed.) (Addison Wesley, 2000), p. 379.
556:
488:
389:
728:
363:necessary but not sufficient conditions
146:both of the following conditions hold:
1068:Third Normal Form with Simple Examples
1056:A tutorial on the first 3 normal forms
7:
934:"Hadoop Data Modeling Lessons | EMC"
778:ACM Transactions on Database Systems
260:is a trivial functional dependency),
1010:(8th ed.). Addison-Wesley Longman.
1007:An Introduction to Database Systems
843:An Introduction to Database Systems
25:
127:The third normal form (3NF) is a
938:InFocus Blog | Dell EMC Services
896:from the original on 2023-03-15.
832:(Scott, Foresman, 1989), p. 331.
135:. 3NF was originally defined by
965:Journal of Statistical Software
819:26 (2), Feb. 1983, pp. 120–125.
213:(where it is not the case that
123:Definition of third normal form
959:Wickham, Hadley (2014-09-12).
1:
1044:Database Normalization Basics
863:http://webdam.inria.fr/Alice/
325:, the set difference between
61:. It was defined in 1971 by
1202:Lossless join decomposition
1046:by Mike Chapple (About.com)
333:, is a prime attribute.").
197:) indirectly, by virtue of
1253:
1140:Elementary key normal form
1039:Litt's Tips: Normalization
884:"Decomposition, 3NF, BCNF"
802:(5th edition), p. 276–277.
555:
487:
1215:
1179:
1111:
817:Communications of the ACM
289:(i.e., each attribute in
799:Database System Concepts
665:Normalization beyond 3NF
558:Winner's dates of birth
409:Winner's date of birth
1237:Database normalization
1192:Multivalued dependency
1164:Domain-key normal form
1146:Boyce–Codd normal form
1105:Database normalization
749:. Prentice-Hall, 1972.
717:Attribute-value system
672:Boyce–Codd normal form
377:Boyce–Codd normal form
315:Boyce–Codd normal form
285:between Y and X, is a
133:database normalization
117:Boyce–Codd normal form
90:functionally dependent
1187:Functional dependency
978:10.18637/jss.v059.i10
780:7(3), September 1982.
628:functional dependency
337:"Nothing but the key"
297:is contained in some
179:functional dependency
175:transitive dependency
106:transitive dependency
55:referential integrity
1004:Date, C. J. (1999),
790:Abraham Silberschatz
767:Codd, p. 45–46.
697:dimensional modeling
543:Indiana Invitational
510:Indiana Invitational
456:Indiana Invitational
414:Indiana Invitational
43:relational databases
41:design approach for
940:. 23 September 2014
857:, Richard B. Hull,
830:Database Management
559:
491:
490:Tournament winners
392:
391:Tournament winners
167:non-prime attribute
1152:Fourth normal form
1128:Second normal form
1070:by exploreDatabase
914:. 12 February 2013
872:. Theorem 11.2.14.
592:28 September 1968
557:
532:Des Moines Masters
489:
442:Des Moines Masters
437:28 September 1968
390:
156:second normal form
104:and do not have a
98:second normal form
1224:
1223:
1207:Temporal database
1170:Sixth normal form
1158:Fifth normal form
1134:Third normal form
1122:First normal form
1116:Unnormalized form
841:Date, C. J.
758:Codd, p. 43.
600:
599:
596:
595:
553:
552:
469:
468:
273:every element of
108:on another key.
78:database relation
31:Third normal form
16:(Redirected from
1244:
1098:
1091:
1084:
1075:
1052:by Mike Hillyer.
1021:Kent, W. (1983)
991:
990:
980:
956:
950:
949:
947:
945:
930:
924:
923:
921:
919:
904:
898:
897:
895:
888:
879:
873:
852:
846:
839:
833:
826:
820:
809:
803:
796:, S. Sudarshan,
787:
781:
774:
768:
765:
759:
756:
750:
742:
736:
733:
560:
492:
485:
484:
393:
154:R (table) is in
86:database columns
67:relational model
21:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1220:
1218:Denormalization
1211:
1197:Join dependency
1175:
1107:
1102:
1058:by Fred Coulson
1035:
1030:
1000:
998:Further reading
995:
994:
958:
957:
953:
943:
941:
932:
931:
927:
917:
915:
906:
905:
901:
893:
886:
882:Hammo, Bassam.
881:
880:
876:
855:Serge Abiteboul
853:
849:
840:
836:
827:
823:
811:Kent, William.
810:
806:
788:
784:
775:
771:
766:
762:
757:
753:
743:
739:
734:
730:
725:
713:
688:
667:
655:
647:canonical cover
640:polynomial time
637:
633:
621:
617:
608:
549:Chip Masterson
538:Al Fredrickson
516:Al Fredrickson
339:
287:prime attribute
248:is a subset of
137:E. F. Codd
125:
59:data management
57:, and simplify
39:database schema
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1250:
1248:
1240:
1239:
1229:
1228:
1222:
1221:
1216:
1213:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1167:
1161:
1155:
1149:
1148:(3.5NF / BCNF)
1143:
1137:
1131:
1125:
1119:
1112:
1109:
1108:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1093:
1086:
1078:
1072:
1071:
1065:
1059:
1053:
1047:
1041:
1034:
1033:External links
1031:
1029:
1028:
1019:
1001:
999:
996:
993:
992:
951:
925:
899:
874:
847:
834:
821:
804:
794:Henry F. Korth
782:
769:
760:
751:
737:
727:
726:
724:
721:
720:
719:
712:
709:
687:
684:
666:
663:
654:
651:
635:
631:
619:
615:
607:
604:
598:
597:
594:
593:
590:
586:
585:
582:
581:Al Fredrickson
578:
577:
576:14 March 1977
574:
573:Chip Masterson
570:
569:
568:Date of birth
566:
554:
551:
550:
547:
544:
540:
539:
536:
533:
529:
528:
527:Bob Albertson
525:
522:
521:Cleveland Open
518:
517:
514:
511:
507:
506:
503:
498:
467:
466:
465:14 March 1977
463:
462:Chip Masterson
460:
457:
453:
452:
449:
448:Al Fredrickson
446:
443:
439:
438:
435:
432:
429:
428:Cleveland Open
425:
424:
421:
420:Al Fredrickson
418:
415:
411:
410:
407:
404:
399:
338:
335:
303:
302:
283:set difference
271:
261:
163:
162:
159:
144:if and only if
124:
121:
102:candidate keys
82:database table
51:data anomalies
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1249:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1232:
1219:
1214:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1178:
1171:
1168:
1165:
1162:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1144:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1110:
1106:
1099:
1094:
1092:
1087:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1032:
1026:
1025:
1020:
1017:
1016:0-321-19784-4
1013:
1009:
1008:
1003:
1002:
997:
988:
984:
979:
974:
970:
966:
962:
955:
952:
939:
935:
929:
926:
913:
909:
903:
900:
892:
885:
878:
875:
871:
867:
864:
860:
856:
851:
848:
844:
838:
835:
831:
825:
822:
818:
814:
808:
805:
801:
800:
795:
791:
786:
783:
779:
773:
770:
764:
761:
755:
752:
748:
741:
738:
732:
729:
722:
718:
715:
714:
710:
708:
706:
702:
698:
693:
685:
683:
681:
677:
673:
664:
662:
660:
652:
650:
648:
643:
641:
629:
625:
613:
605:
603:
591:
589:Bob Albertson
588:
587:
584:21 July 1975
583:
580:
579:
575:
572:
571:
567:
565:
562:
561:
548:
545:
542:
541:
537:
534:
531:
530:
526:
523:
520:
519:
515:
512:
509:
508:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
493:
486:
483:
480:
476:
474:
473:composite key
464:
461:
458:
455:
454:
451:21 July 1975
450:
447:
444:
441:
440:
436:
434:Bob Albertson
433:
430:
427:
426:
423:21 July 1975
422:
419:
416:
413:
412:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
394:
388:
385:
382:
378:
374:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
351:
349:
344:
336:
334:
332:
328:
324:
321: \
320:
316:
312:
309: \
308:
300:
299:candidate key
296:
293: \
292:
288:
284:
280:
277: \
276:
272:
269:
265:
262:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
235:
234:
232:
228:
222:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
171:candidate key
168:
160:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
145:
140:
138:
134:
130:
122:
120:
118:
113:
109:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
74:
72:
68:
64:
63:Edgar F. Codd
60:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
19:
1182:Dependencies
1160:(5NF / PJNF)
1133:
1064:by Microsoft
1022:
1005:
968:
964:
954:
942:. Retrieved
937:
928:
916:. Retrieved
911:
902:
877:
859:Victor Vianu
850:
842:
837:
829:
824:
816:
807:
797:
785:
777:
772:
763:
754:
746:
740:
731:
705:data science
689:
668:
656:
644:
609:
601:
563:
500:
495:
481:
477:
470:
401:
396:
386:
380:
371:
366:
352:
340:
330:
326:
322:
318:
310:
306:
304:
294:
290:
286:
278:
274:
263:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
230:
226:
223:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
166:
164:
141:
126:
114:
110:
92:on solely a
75:
73:management.
34:
30:
29:
961:"Tidy Data"
912:Roelant Vos
612:projections
606:Computation
193:determines
129:normal form
47:normalizing
45:which uses
870:0201537710
723:References
496:Tournament
397:Tournament
373:Chris Date
252:, meaning
244:(that is,
139:in 1971.
987:1548-7660
692:Analytics
240:contains
181:in which
53:, ensure
1231:Category
971:: 1–23.
891:Archived
711:See also
634:, ..., R
618:, ..., R
268:superkey
173:of R. A
152:relation
131:used in
80:(e.g. a
71:database
944:5 March
918:5 March
505:Winner
381:non-key
37:) is a
1166:(DKNF)
1142:(EKNF)
1014:
985:
868:
701:Hadoop
622:whose
564:Winner
406:Winner
281:, the
158:(2NF).
88:) are
1172:(6NF)
1154:(4NF)
1136:(3NF)
1130:(2NF)
1124:(1NF)
1118:(UNF)
894:(PDF)
887:(PDF)
266:is a
177:is a
1012:ISBN
983:ISSN
946:2018
920:2018
866:ISBN
703:and
624:join
546:1999
535:1999
524:1999
513:1998
501:Year
459:1999
445:1999
431:1999
417:1998
402:Year
348:Codd
343:oath
329:and
205:and
150:The
69:for
973:doi
680:5NF
678:or
676:4NF
367:all
359:2NF
355:1NF
350:".
221:).
94:key
35:3NF
18:3NF
1233::
981:.
969:59
967:.
963:.
936:.
910:.
889:.
815:,
792:,
682:.
659:FD
642:.
301:).
256:→
229:→
217:→
209:→
201:→
185:→
165:A
119:.
76:A
1097:e
1090:t
1083:v
1018:.
989:.
975::
948:.
922:.
636:n
632:1
620:n
616:1
614:R
331:X
327:Y
323:X
319:Y
311:X
307:Y
295:X
291:Y
279:X
275:Y
270:,
264:X
258:Y
254:X
250:X
246:Y
242:Y
238:X
231:Y
227:X
219:X
215:Y
211:Z
207:Y
203:Y
199:X
195:Z
191:X
189:(
187:Z
183:X
33:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.