168:. According to this view, dispositional and categorical - or as Martin prefers "qualitative", because categorical seems to be misleading - predicates are different ways of identifying one and the same property. Additionally, the properties lie on a spectrum in which it could approach either limit; however, it can never reach either end because those concepts are unrealizable. Ontologically, however, there is no real difference between the two. Fragility, for example, is both a real disposition of glass to break upon being struck and abstraction from the underlying molecular structure. Squareness, to take another example, is both a quality of having four sides of equal length that meet at equal angles and an abstraction from the fact this property interacts with its environment to leave square impressions on soft wax (when combined with the property ‘hardness’).
209:
crucial role in strengthening and diversifying these dispositions, enhancing learners' competencies and approaches to learning. The documentation and assessment of learning dispositions, as discussed in various studies, are vital for providing feedback to the educational community, including students, teachers, and families. This comprehensive view recognizes the dynamic nature of dispositions in both academic and personal development contexts, highlighting the importance of continuous adaptation and application of learning dispositions throughout an individual's life.
205:
individual carrying their unique set of dispositions throughout this process. This perspective emphasizes the importance of recognizing and nurturing one's dispositions not only in academic or structured settings but also in self-guided learning endeavors and everyday life experiences. Such an approach encourages a lifelong learning mindset, where individuals continuously adapt and apply their learning dispositions in various contexts, including emerging platforms like digital media and online communities.
229:
189:
Claxton and Carr (2004) argue for a deliberate approach to fostering learning dispositions, suggesting that classrooms and early childhood settings play a crucial role in enhancing these dispositions. They emphasize that education should aim to increase the frequency, robustness, and complexity of valued learning responses, thereby deepening students' competencies and expanding their methods of learning.
93:
Paradigmatic examples of dispositional properties include fragility, solubility, and flammability. Dispositionalism maintains that even paradigmatic examples of what appears to be qualitative such as squareness has causal powers (for instance - when combined with the property of hardness - to make a square impression in soft wax). This view is historically argued for by
196:
In the context of higher education, studies have shown variations in students' inclinations towards research and information gathering. For instance, in a study conducted by Hardy, Kordonowy, and Liss (2024), students in different course sections demonstrated varying degrees of problem-exploring and
128:
about dispositions, or categorical, argues that dispositions are ontologically derivative of the interaction of categorical (or qualitative) properties and laws. Accordingly calling a glass fragile, is a useful shorthand for describing the potential interactions of its microstructure (a categorical
208:
Summary: Dispositions in education encompass the tendencies and inclinations that shape how individuals engage with learning opportunities. These dispositions are influenced and developed through formal educational settings, as well as personal and informal learning environments. Education plays a
200:
The concept of dispositions in early childhood education has been a subject of interest for researchers like Katz (1985), who explore how these dispositions develop in young learners. The
Effective Lifelong Learning Inventory (ELLI) has been a tool to measure various learning dispositions, such as
192:
The development of learning dispositions within educational settings is seen as essential, as these environments can exemplify and encourage the growth of such dispositions. Documenting the development of these dispositions is considered an important feedback mechanism for the involved community,
188:
In the realm of education, dispositions refer to the tendencies of individuals to respond to, interpret, and construct learning opportunities in particular ways. These dispositions are not static but are dynamically affected by educational experiences, which can either strengthen or weaken them.
92:
about dispositions, or dispositionalism, argues that dispositions are causally efficacious properties inherent to objects that are sufficient to produce change. Consider fragility. If a glass is suitably struck, it will break. Fragility is a property of the glass that accounts for this breaking.
204:
In addition to formal educational settings, the understanding and application of learning dispositions have significance in informal learning and personal development contexts. As highlighted in
Dispositions Toward Learning by Well, the journey of learning is continuous and evolving, with each
129:
property) and the laws of nature; dispositions are not additional elements of being. Since the microstructure and laws are enough to explain fragility, there is no causal role for a dispositional property, here fragility, to play. This view is historically argued for by
69:
A disposition is not a process or event in some duration in time, but rather the state, preparation, or tendency of a structure "in waiting". In the field of possibilities, its actual triggering has a statistical value.
197:
answer-getting dispositions in their end-of-term reflections. This variation underscores the influence of instructional design and the educational environment on shaping students' learning dispositions.
268:
of behaving in a certain way, for example, "a virtue is an habitual and firm disposition to do the good." Secondly, it may refer to a state of a person that is required for reception of a
193:
including teachers, children, and families. This documentation calls for further research on methods to trace the development of learning dispositions beyond a single educational setting.
62:'s theory of fields, dispositions are the natural tendencies of each individual to take on a specific position in any field. There is no strict determinism through one's dispositions. The
157:, continue in a neo-Human, empiricist tradition that argues for categorical on the assumption that there are no necessary connections between distinct existences.
699:
367:
Shoemaker, S., 1980, ‘Causality and
Properties’, in P. van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, Dordrecht: Reidel, 109–135.
201:
critical curiosity, creativity, and meaning-making. These dispositions are essential for continuous improvement and adaptation in the learning process.
591:
387:
747:
732:
89:
344:
770:
457:
Hume, D. (1748), An
Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge and P.H. Nidditch
66:
is the choice of positions according to one's dispositions. However, in retrospect, a space of possibles can always be observed.
480:
636:"Assessing learning dispositions: is the Effective lifelong learning inventory valid and reliable as a measurement tool?"
55:
but not currently being considered, and in the latter case, to a belief that is currently being considered by the mind.
22:
611:"CF 48: Answer-Getting and Problem-Exploring in First-Year Writing by Sarah Madsen Hardy, Gwen Kordonowy, and Ken Liss"
118:
300:
146:
98:
696:
83:
588:
310:
150:
177:
161:
381:
273:
40:
305:
544:
635:
433:
290:
142:
505:
160:
Middle ground views are possible. The most notable is the Limit (or
Identity) View defended by
655:
564:
525:
486:
476:
350:
340:
295:
272:, for example, a disposition of genuine repentance is required for the forgiveness of sins in
154:
130:
647:
556:
517:
425:
218:
102:
44:
673:
610:
264:
thought, "disposition" has two meanings. Firstly, it may refer to a deliberately practiced
765:
738:
703:
595:
110:
82:
attempts to understand the fundamental nature of properties, including how they relate to
719:
469:
114:
410:
228:
759:
742:
261:
134:
125:
560:
106:
79:
36:, a preparation, a state of readiness, or a tendency to act in a specified way.
723:
651:
521:
138:
659:
568:
529:
354:
240: with: This is an important topic in Christian theology. You can help by
490:
269:
165:
94:
728:
59:
380:
Choi, Sungho; Fara, Michael (January 27, 2018). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.).
437:
285:
48:
429:
315:
265:
33:
545:"A framework for teaching learning: the dynamics of disposition"
52:
222:
180:
is a civil or criminal hearing where a case can be resolved.
510:
Assessment in
Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
124:
Others answer that dispositions are not real properties.
398:– via Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Archive.
411:"Are dispositions reducible to categorical properties?"
375:
373:
241:
86:. The initial question asks if dispositions are real.
506:"Tracking the Development of Learning Dispositions"
468:
634:Crick, Ruth Deakin; Yu, Guoxing (December 2008).
386:. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
674:"Dispositions Towards Learning – Writing Spaces"
18:Tendency of a person to act in a specified way
8:
335:Max Kistler; Bruno Gnassounou, eds. (2016).
543:Claxton, Guy; Carr, Margaret (March 2004).
504:Carr, Margaret; Claxton, Guy (March 2002).
327:
605:
603:
145:. Contemporary proponents, including
7:
580:
578:
748:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
733:Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project
390:from the original on July 25, 2020
101:. Contemporary proponents include
14:
78:The debate about dispositions in
585:Catechism of the Catholic Church
227:
47:refer, in the former case, to a
337:Dispositions and causal powers
1:
32:is a quality of character, a
561:10.1080/09575140320001790898
471:Dispositions : a debate
23:Disposition (disambiguation)
787:
216:
20:
652:10.1080/00131880802499886
522:10.1080/09695940220119148
467:Armstrong, D. M. (1996).
301:Dispositional attribution
697:Sacramental dispositions
409:Franklin, James (1986).
771:Metaphysical properties
418:Philosophical Quarterly
311:Nature versus nurture
151:David Malet Armstrong
640:Educational Research
615:compositionforum.com
51:that is held in the
41:dispositional belief
21:For other uses, see
693:Catholic Dictionary
306:Habitus (sociology)
143:logical positivists
121:, and Brian Ellis.
702:2018-01-11 at the
594:2020-04-10 at the
291:Adaptive expertise
296:Counterfactualism
258:
257:
162:Charles B. Martin
155:Jonathan Schaffer
778:
752:
739:Zalta, Edward N.
707:
690:
684:
683:
681:
680:
670:
664:
663:
631:
625:
624:
622:
621:
607:
598:
582:
573:
572:
540:
534:
533:
501:
495:
494:
474:
464:
458:
455:
449:
448:
446:
444:
415:
406:
400:
399:
397:
395:
377:
368:
365:
359:
358:
332:
253:
250:
231:
223:
219:State (theology)
103:Sydney Shoemaker
45:occurrent belief
786:
785:
781:
780:
779:
777:
776:
775:
756:
755:
737:
716:
711:
710:
704:Wayback Machine
691:
687:
678:
676:
672:
671:
667:
633:
632:
628:
619:
617:
609:
608:
601:
596:Wayback Machine
583:
576:
542:
541:
537:
503:
502:
498:
483:
466:
465:
461:
456:
452:
442:
440:
430:10.2307/2219311
413:
408:
407:
403:
393:
391:
379:
378:
371:
366:
362:
347:
334:
333:
329:
324:
282:
254:
248:
245:
238:needs expansion
232:
221:
215:
186:
174:
111:Stephen Mumford
76:
26:
19:
12:
11:
5:
784:
782:
774:
773:
768:
758:
757:
754:
753:
743:"Dispositions"
735:
726:
715:
714:External links
712:
709:
708:
685:
665:
646:(4): 387–402.
626:
599:
574:
535:
496:
481:
459:
450:
424:(142): 62–64.
401:
369:
360:
345:
326:
325:
323:
320:
319:
318:
313:
308:
303:
298:
293:
288:
281:
278:
256:
255:
235:
233:
226:
217:Main article:
214:
211:
185:
182:
173:
170:
115:Alexander Bird
84:laws of nature
75:
72:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
783:
772:
769:
767:
764:
763:
761:
750:
749:
744:
740:
736:
734:
730:
727:
725:
721:
718:
717:
713:
705:
701:
698:
694:
689:
686:
675:
669:
666:
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
630:
627:
616:
612:
606:
604:
600:
597:
593:
590:
586:
581:
579:
575:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
539:
536:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
500:
497:
492:
488:
484:
478:
475:. Routledge.
473:
472:
463:
460:
454:
451:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
412:
405:
402:
389:
385:
384:
376:
374:
370:
364:
361:
356:
352:
348:
346:9781315577616
342:
339:. Routledge.
338:
331:
328:
321:
317:
314:
312:
309:
307:
304:
302:
299:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
284:
283:
279:
277:
275:
271:
267:
263:
252:
243:
239:
236:This section
234:
230:
225:
224:
220:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
183:
181:
179:
171:
169:
167:
163:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
122:
120:
119:George Molnar
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
85:
81:
73:
71:
67:
65:
61:
56:
54:
50:
46:
42:
37:
35:
31:
24:
16:
746:
692:
688:
677:. Retrieved
668:
643:
639:
629:
618:. Retrieved
614:
584:
555:(1): 87–97.
552:
548:
538:
513:
509:
499:
470:
462:
453:
441:. Retrieved
421:
417:
404:
392:. Retrieved
383:Dispositions
382:
363:
336:
330:
259:
246:
242:adding to it
237:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
175:
159:
126:Anti-realism
123:
88:
77:
68:
63:
57:
38:
29:
27:
15:
729:Disposition
720:Disposition
549:Early Years
516:(1): 9–37.
394:January 27,
178:disposition
147:David Lewis
80:metaphysics
74:Metaphysics
30:disposition
760:Categories
724:PhilPapers
679:2024-03-02
620:2024-03-02
482:0415144329
322:References
274:confession
176:In law, a
107:U.T. Place
39:The terms
660:0013-1881
589:par. 1803
569:0957-5146
530:0969-594X
355:952728282
270:sacrament
262:Christian
184:Education
166:John Heil
131:Descartes
95:Aristotle
700:Archived
592:Archived
491:33898477
388:Archived
280:See also
249:May 2016
213:Religion
141:and the
60:Bourdieu
741:(ed.).
731:at the
443:30 June
438:2219311
286:Ability
99:Leibniz
90:Realism
64:habitus
766:Belief
658:
567:
528:
489:
479:
436:
353:
343:
153:, and
49:belief
434:JSTOR
414:(PDF)
316:Truth
266:habit
135:Boyle
34:habit
656:ISSN
565:ISSN
526:ISSN
487:OCLC
477:ISBN
445:2021
396:2021
351:OCLC
341:ISBN
164:and
139:Hume
97:and
53:mind
43:and
722:at
648:doi
557:doi
518:doi
426:doi
260:In
244:.
172:Law
58:In
762::
745:.
695:,
654:.
644:50
642:.
638:.
613:.
602:^
587:,
577:^
563:.
553:24
551:.
547:.
524:.
512:.
508:.
485:.
432:.
422:36
420:.
416:.
372:^
349:.
276:.
149:,
137:,
133:,
117:,
113:,
109:,
105:,
28:A
751:.
706:.
682:.
662:.
650::
623:.
571:.
559::
532:.
520::
514:9
493:.
447:.
428::
357:.
251:)
247:(
25:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
