Talk:Michael Knighton

531:

verifiable source, either the backers themselves quoted or Michael Knighton himself declaring it to be true I see no other alternative than to omit that sentence. I would suggest we amend it to read "the reasons are unknown for Knighton's withdrawal, however the speculation at the time was his financial backers pulled out of the bid. I think that is perfectly reasonable. You also state that the "the whole 'in retrospect' thing is irrelevant" which clearly shows that you have missed the point. Michael Knighton created a blueprint which transfomed Manchester United from a turnover of just £7 million per annum with a £1.29 million loss in the year 1988 to a £25 million turnover over the next 5 years. Manchester United had not made a profit for the previous 20 years, when Michael Knighton joined that immediately changed. I dont think you can say that is a coincidence. Knighton is even quoted as saying "I can turn Manchester United into a £150 million company within 15 years" Financial Times, 12 September 1989. Considering Manchester United is worth £2.1 billion now - I think his predictions are very relevant, and, in turn, making the "retrospect" highly relevant. There is an article on this very point from the telegraph

484:

propaganda team would have us believe. I think it is a bit much to describe him as an artist and poet simply because he's drawn a few pictures, written a few lines of verse and stuck them up on his website. Very few third-party sources would describe him as an artist or poet and neither should we. Furthermore, his bid for Manchester United was actually only £20m – £10m to buy Martin Edwards' shares and a potential £10m more to buy the shares off the rest of the shareholders at the same price he had offered Edwards. The extra £10m you mentioned came in the form of proposed renovations to Old Trafford. You claim that Knighton's bid to buy the club fell through for unknown reasons, but the reasons are in fact quite well known – his financial backers pulled out, leaving him marginally short of the asking price. Your contributions to the article read like you have intimate knowledge of Knighton's business history, yet your comments here give the opposite impression. If you have any connection to Knighton, it behoves you to inform us. –

426:

ill-informed information and very clear prejudice against the man, is somewhat telling. Further, what ever he is doing now - I guess that he has moved on from the sad place that you appear locked into yourself relating to events of virtually more than a decade ago, if that is not too disrespectful to you. Oh,yes,and finally - Mr. Knighton never did own a wine bar as you , once again, wrongly claim - it belonged to a member of his family - so I am given to believe - from a far more reliable source than your own very embittered, immature and misguided views. What a pity the man is not here to defend himself against the likes of you - because believe,Sir,when I tell you this based on your comments to date- intellectually,spiritually,emotionally - you could not live with the guy.

511:

fantastic and original art ideas which he is able to bring into artistic reality. The Cambridge exhibition displayed fine examples of his talent. He is a very fine artist in his own right. Michael has the potential, if only he would stop hiding the light of his artistic talent under a bushel, to go down as perhaps one of the most notable artists of the third quarter of the twentieth century. Michael is up there with the very best of the living modern day artists which we see around the art world today”. Also for your reference is a video filmed during the exhibition where the general public discuss their views on the Michael Knighton's

561:(Michael Crick, Mihir Bose, Jim White) all report it in top-selling books, then it becomes something to take notice of. There are no sources who claim that the deal fell apart for any reason other than that the money wasn't there, so I don't see any reason to beat about the bush. As for entrepreneurship, he may have acted in an entrepreneurial way in the past, but that is not what he is known for. Neither is he very well known for his art or poetry; he may have been published as a poet and had his art exhibited, but those things are not what he is primarily known for. 1294:

institution for the first time should be considered notable information for the 'After Football' section. The summer exhibition is a public event which recieves national media coverage each year, Knighton's inclusion may be of interest to someone reading about his activies after football. I noticed from reading the chat page you were against establishing an 'After football' section in the first place. Does this explain a reluctance to add anything further? We might disagree on this addition to the page and have requested a Third opinion to help us both.

579:

don't know what is. He is known for owning football clubs which translates as entrepreneurial in its very definition. Also it is irrespective if Knighton is more widely known for one subject matter than another - that point doesn't negate the fact that he is also an accomplished artist and poet - verified by third parties. Knighton is mainly known for his football exploits as is mentioned, however I don't see why the other exploits should be omitted which are of public interest and are well documented. Your example of

657:

must have been motivated or inspired by this particular ancestor to pursue his career in professional football. Which makes this information in respect of his great-grandfather particularly pertinent and relevant. However I've really had enough with the constant battle, this is exactly why wikipedia editors are dropping dramatically, as it is not a pleasant environment to be in. To quote wikipedia itself "Others go away because they find the community too hostile" taken from the visual editor page

376: 783:). His poetry is not yet published, and I don't know if the future work is from a reputable publisher of self-published - but if it is from a proper publisher, then that is relevant. The political commentary is just a blog, and barely notable. I suggest a sub-section after Carlisle United which covers this topic, along the the lines of "After football", which would describe what he's been up to, focusing on the Kongthin Pearlmich incident. -- 677:

list isn't even readily available anywhere and only appears in one obscure book. It wasn't an official club poll or anything like that, just the opinion of the author of one book. Furthermore, where is your evidence that Knighton was inspired by his ancestor? Maybe he just liked football. You don't have to have a relative who played the sport to want to do it yourself. Finally, I'm not being hostile, I'm just presenting my argument. –

997:. As for it not being notable, as I've said before - anyone can see that Kinghton purportedly offering a £70m sculpture to Kings College Cathedral and spending £40,000 installing it for 3 days is pretty notable. It's certainly more interesting and notable than a newspaper report that he saw a UFO. The artwork being covered by the Telegraph newspaper and BBC, again is more notable than the UFO story covered by a local newspaper. - 348: 119: 95: 64: 336: 181: 260: 229: 643:; we don't work based on what the majority wants, we work around policies designed to help us decide what should and should not go into articles. You think being one of the 125 "greatest players" at a club like Sheffield Wednesday is interesting? I don't disagree, but I don't think it's what makes Layton notable, especially given the status of Sheffield Wednesday. – 270: 193: 601:. There was no need to remove the reference to Knighton's great grandfather. There is no page currently created for Willie Layton so it seems all the more bizarre that it would be removed. The point is completely relevant and adds interesting information to Knighton's possible inspiration for pursuing football. The edit was approved by 542:

your above derogatory comments for the mans accomplishments. I imagined you would have issues with the additions I had made hence the request of a third opinion. I am more than happy to discuss your issues with my contributions, but I ask that you do so in a respectful and rational manner, citing references for your objections.

129: 507:. Considering the artwork weighed 3 tons, cost £40,000 to position and was viewed by the general public - I think we can agree that constitutes as more 'than a few pictures' as you put it. Not to mention the 6,000 artworks Michael Knighton has created in his studio, some of which can be viewed on his website. 623:

I do not see how one sentence can be too specific. It is an interesting point, more interesting than the league and FA Cup reference. Its not one editor, it is two editors who approve of the change. Thats 2:1, those odds favour keeping the statement. I must say, Its becoming rather tiresome having to

992:

Other than the fact Knighton officially announced that he is Konghtin Pearlmich on his own website (and no one had disputed this claim , has intricate details of the artist and images of the said artwork - which can be found nowhere else, I'll cite another source. Here's another link, this time from

895:

Whatever reliable sources ascribe to him is usable - it is not up to us to make any claims in Knowledge's voice, only to relate the claims made in reliable sources. If a RS source calls him a "political commentator" then we follow that, if one calls him a "poet" and he s not a published poet, then

578:

Well I suppose we shall have to wait for new sources to come to light to find out the origin of the story and what happened. However I still do not see how it is still not speculation. If acting in an entrepreneurial way is not buying football clubs (highly risky business investments) then I really

541:

I have researched Michael Knighton in great depth and find him a fascinating character, however I have held back from writing with bias or POV. However you seem to have a personal dislike of the man, this is obvious especially when reading your edit comments from previous versions of the article and

421:

The simple answer is not much. Bothered around with Darlington FC for a bit. Went back to Durham Uni but dropped out after a term. (I would also question the fact that he graduated from Durham University in the first place - I have a feeling he went to Durham New College, not the University -as such

798:

I have tried to establish who is publishing his poetry to no avail. We need to establish if the publisher is mainstream, if so it should feature in the article. However, if the work is self published then there is little point mentioning it. I concur that there needs to be a sub-section addition,

714:

project. The guidelines of that project say, "Before making a request here, be sure that the issue has been thoroughly discussed on the article talk page. 3O is only for assistance in resolving disagreements that have come to a standstill." The request for a Third Opinion in regard to this dispute

676:

No, I don't think that's what makes him notable. If you asked anyone who had heard of Layton what they knew him for, they would most likely say "Oh, he was part of the Wednesday team that won the league twice in the 1900s", not "Oh, he's one of our 125 greatest players". That 125 greatest players

656:

If you don't think being 125th out of more than 5,000 professional players for Sheffield Wednesday over the years is what makes Willie Layton notable, then clearly your definition of "notable" perhaps differs from the majority general consensus. The more important point - is that clearly Knighton

526:

and of course taking into account his bid to purchase manchester United and his purchase of Carlisle United all contribute to being entrepreneurial or "operating a business, taking on financial risk to do so". Regarding being a political commentator I point to various interviews on television and

965:

Surprised it took you 40 minutes to delete it, you're normally quicker. Here is the quote: “I did in the end use my own name, but I wrote it in reverse,” from here, third last paragraph. Konghtin Pearlmich is an anagram of Michael Knighton with an additional "P". Doesn't really matter what your

498:

I think using the term propaganda is extreme considering the majority of additions are minor. Secondly, Michael Knighton has written over 3,000 poems with two books due for release later this year. I would hardly call that a "few lines of verse" . As for 'drawing a few pictures', I would ask you

425:

I am afraid that - whether you like it or not,Sir - Mr. Knighton did indeed attend Bede College , Durham University as a very genuine and real Durham University student of merit - I know because I was in his year at the same University. Might I ask which University did you attend yourself ? Your

1293:

Thanks PeeJay for your comments. Appreciate the Daily Mail is a deprecated source (hence used only in the chat) but the RA catalogue and links to the exhibition are not. I understand your point regarding the appropriateness of such an event. I think exhibiting artwork at a nationally recognised

560:

I have no feelings one way or another towards Knighton. If you have interpreted my comments as negative towards him, then I fear you are simply seeing what you want/expect to see. You are right that repetition of a fact does not increase its veracity; however, when various respected journalists

530:

On the Manchester United bid, again, it is widely reported that his financial backers pulled out, however I have been unable to find an original article where this information was sourced from. Just because something is repeated over a long period of time doesn't make it fact. If you can find a

483:

This article has been subject to a lot of attention from sources very close to Mr Knighton, who have continually claimed that the facts contained therein are not reflective of the situation as it actually happened. However, we can only go by what is reported in the media, not what Mr Knighton's

1280:

No one is disputing the accuracy of the information, the issue is whether it's really appropriate to mention in an encyclopaedic article. Furthermore, the Daily Mail isn't really considered a reliable source on Knowledge, so if you could provide a different source, that would be appreciated. –

510:

In response to your comment: "Very few third-party sources would describe him as an artist or poet", I would point you to Tim Kendrew's comment on Michael Knighton (Tim Kendrew was formally head of Christies Auction House in Melbourne Australia) "Michael Knighton is a creative genius. He has

1344:

The inclusion of the works in the Royal Academy of Arts Summer Exhibition seems relevant, but the content of the works definitely doesn't. I would keep the citation, but change the line to something like "In 2022, Knighton exhibited two mixed media works at the Royal Academy of Arts Summer

535:, to quote "It was a visionary plan, one which has now been adopted by football clubs across the globe". There is another article from the Manchester Evening news, I quote "Oh, and quite possibly one of sport's greatest visionaries of the last 20 years. " The article can be found 1252:. Third-party coverage can be found in an article written by Joe Bernstien for The Mail on Sunday, Aug. 2022, discussing Manchester United and the Glazers in which Knighton's inclusion in the RA Summer Exhibition is mentioned. A version of this article also appeared online 1212:

Hello fellow Wiki editors, please can you review the following edit to 'after football' section : "In 2022, Knighton exhibited two works at the Royal Academy of Arts Summer Exhibition. One of the works depicts a silhouette of a footballer and a bee.". Thanks in advance

919:

detailing some of the backstory to the Manchester United bid. I think his Poetry and art are certainly worth mentioning now, perhaps in a section "after football" or something similar. Also it would be good to check the facts of the article in FourFourTwo. Thoughts?

527:

print as well as online where Knighton has been asked to comment. Again videos can be sourced and archived articles can be referenced if you are still having difficulty with that point - his official website lists various articles on said subject matter as well.

609:

Just because one other editor approves of a change does not necessarily mean the edit is kosher. The information about Willie Layton is too specific for an article about his great-grandson. By all means, however, create the article about Willie Layton. –

464:

I am more than happy to discuss issues editors may have with my changes, but only on the basis they cite authoritative references and use unbiased language when writing on this page. The article suffers from unverified facts and bias language.

770:

It's a question of balance. A quick google search reveals that (unexpectedly!) his artwork has had an impact: he appears to be 'Kongthin Pearlmich' (an anagram of his name) who has been written about after a bit of a stunt a few years ago (eg

875:

What needs to be added now is a new section after Carlisle on what he is doing currently. As I mentioned before, I think this should be written by someone with knowledge in the arts subject matter to describe the kind of Art Knighton does.

715:

has been removed because there has been no such talk page discussion between the editors involved in the dispute. Consider leaving a note on the other editor's user talk page asking him or her to come here to discuss the matter. Regards,

522:, which wikipedia defines as "An entrepreneur is an individual who organizes and operates a business or businesses, taking on financial risk to do so.". Knighton is referenced multiple times in the press as being a "property magnet" 624:

debate with you every single addition made to this article when references are provided. I wouldn't create an article on Willie Layton, as most likely you would have issue with every sentence written if I was the creator. --

814:

Calling him an "amateur poet" or "aspiring poet" would be good if the publisher cannot be determined. However, I believe it would be alright to simply call him a poet (if it can be found that the books have actually been

1308:

I would welcome a third opinion. You're right, personally I don't think Knighton's art career is particularly noteworthy, and that's backed up by the paucity of sources, but I'd like to see what others think. –

1244:. The RA summer exhibition is the world's oldest open submission exhibition, held every year since 1769 for emerging and established artists. Some of the world's best artists have exhibited in this exhibition 1321:

Great, thanks for welcoming an 3O on this PeeJay. Btw, I'm in your camp on Knighton's art, but appreciate some people must obviously like it, including the judges at the RA (stops typing and scratches head).

452:

It seems Michael Knighton has a website which goes into great detail about himself and his other persuits including being an artist and poet. He reportedly created a scultpture said to be worth £70 million.

499:

perform proper due diligence before making redundant statements like the aforementioned. Michael Knighton has had his work exhibited at the prestigious Kings College Chapel, Cambridge. Which is documented

896:

we can presumably so state. And so on. If a source says he took part in a stunt, then we can report on the stunt. Just as long as we do not violate rules about contentious claims, I see no problems.

1418: 211: 1089: 385: 243: 1413: 1463: 532: 390: 838:

I agree that makes sense on both the writing and artist front. I don't know much about art terminology so I will leave it to someone better versed in the subject to elaborate on. --

639:

Yes, I probably would since you seem to have no idea about editorial discretion, but if the man is notable, someone should create it. As for the statement, you should know that

523: 1458: 1448: 366: 1468: 43: 1240:

This information is of public record. Third-party coverage provided by a national newspaper can be found below. The RA is an internationally recognised charity for the arts

780: 422:

I would suggest removing him from the Durham Alumni pages). He owned a wine bar in Derbyshire for a period i think, but has dropped out of football entirely (hopefully).

1443: 361: 239: 1453: 206: 105: 1135: 1131: 1117: 1423: 565:

has taken part in a few televised poker tournaments, but I wouldn't describe him in the opening sentence of his article as "a footballer and poker player". –

1403: 1090:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150705151936/http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/carlisle-united/latest/michael-knighton-breaks-13-year-carlisle-utd-silence-1.1220258

48: 31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 504: 1107: 1030: 1438: 326: 316: 1093: 772: 500: 454: 856:

The first paragraph should only describe why he is notable. People know him for his involvement in football clubs, not for his poetry and whatnot.

536: 1428: 1408: 147: 23: 1253: 1473: 1433: 966:

opinion of his chosen name is, a fact, is a fact. It would be great if you could contribute to the article instead of regressing it constantly.

916: 518:

Most bizarrely though, you deem Michael Knighton unfit to be titled as an entrepreneur. Perhaps you should look up the term 'entrepreneur'

151: 433: 292: 949:

There's no evidence in the source you provided that "Kongthin Pearlmich" (which is a stupid name, btw) is actually Michael Knighton. –

912: 155: 934:

Added a new section titled "about football" it could do with padding out a bit on the art side, but I think it's sufficient for now.

1113:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

788: 146:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1270: 1228:

Although the information is factual, can you please provide some third-party coverage to prove its encyclopaedic notability? –

142: 100: 1198: 776: 283: 234: 1079: 583:

is a puzzling comparison considering he does not actively pursue it as a career choice nor does he receive merit for it. --

818:

Calling him an artist (or something more specific, depending on the kind of artwork) seems good based on Chalmers' points.

1178: 784: 75: 994: 275: 1108:

http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/carlisle-united/latest/if-carlisle-united-ever-invite-me-back-i-ll-go-knighton-1.1220443

1031:

http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/carlisle-united/latest/if-carlisle-united-ever-invite-me-back-i-ll-go-knighton-1.1220443

1350: 695:

As I am eager to resolve this dispute with rational and logical conversation, I have requested a third opinion. --

658: 1094:

http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/carlisle-united/latest/michael-knighton-breaks-13-year-carlisle-utd-silence-1.1220258

1194: 1134:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

724: 63: 1254:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-11130633/Michael-Knighton-says-end-near-Glazer-family.html

437: 1169: 1057: 353: 32: 1327: 1299: 1266: 1218: 755:

Should Michael Knighton be listed for his other exploits as an artist, poet and political commentator? --

457:

I'm going to take a guess the Konghtin Pearlmich is a pseudonym for Michael Knighton. His web address is

1346: 1153:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1141: 81: 1056:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1258: 861: 830: 661:, fortunately with the new visual editor it will bring some fresh life into this forum. Good luck -- 429: 412:

I can't find any details about what Knighton has done since he left Carlisle - this needs sorting! --

288: 42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 1384: 1341: 1323: 1295: 1262: 1249: 1214: 1002: 984: 971: 953: 939: 925: 881: 843: 804: 760: 741: 716: 700: 681: 666: 647: 640: 629: 614: 588: 569: 550: 488: 473: 375: 291:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1101: 1067: 46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 1138:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

980:

Not quite proof enough, I'd say. Plus I'm pretty sure his exploits still aren't that notable. –

1154: 1073: 901: 602: 1313: 1285: 1232: 1049: 580: 562: 134: 1161: 461:. If I get the time I will attempt to add the additional information that can be verified. 1193:

I have requested blp editors to give this article a once over as Knighton is in the news.

857: 822: 39: 1080:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090828031900/http://www.angelfire.com/dc/3games/halpin.html

1245: 1120:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 998: 981: 967: 950: 935: 921: 877: 839: 800: 756: 737: 696: 678: 662: 644: 625: 611: 598: 584: 566: 546: 485: 469: 413: 1160:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1397: 198: 897: 711: 519: 1083: 1337: 1310: 1282: 1229: 1127: 180: 118: 94: 1126:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 512: 343: 335: 265: 188: 124: 1354: 1331: 1316: 1303: 1288: 1274: 1241: 1235: 1222: 1202: 1183: 1006: 987: 975: 956: 943: 929: 911:

There are a few articles as of late on Michael Knighton's recent exploits

905: 885: 865: 847: 832: 808: 799:

not sure on the title "After football" though. Anyone fancy writing it? --

792: 764: 745: 730: 704: 684: 670: 650: 633: 617: 592: 572: 554: 491: 477: 441: 416: 1248:. Knighton's work is listed in the 254th RA Summer Exhibition catalogue: 736:

Thanks for your input, I have made the request on the users talk page --

515:, as well as the highly respected Ioannis Goss-Taylor and Lady Starkey. 269: 259: 228: 154:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1385:

https://se.royalacademy.org.uk/2022/artworks/michael-knighton/729

1250:

https://www.royalacademy.org.uk/exhibition/summer-exhibition-2023

458: 57: 38:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

15: 597:

In response to the removal of the Willie Layton reference by

1074:

http://archive.thisislancashire.co.uk/1998/04/25/802667.html

374: 334: 179: 1060:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1246:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Royal_Academy_Summer_Exhibition

1053: 1419:

Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles

287:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1130:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 779:) and even had a short-lived article at Knowledge ( 781:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kongthin Pearlmich 1414:Start-Class biography (sports and games) articles 1464:Low-importance Manchester United F.C. articles 1242:https://en.wikipedia.org/Royal_Academy_of_Arts 1116:This message was posted before February 2018. 1084:http://www.angelfire.com/dc/3games/halpin.html 8: 1459:Start-Class Manchester United F.C. articles 1449:Low-importance football in England articles 61: 1469:Manchester United F.C. task force articles 1256: 223: 89: 1048:I have just modified 2 external links on 1444:Start-Class football in England articles 1454:Football in England task force articles 1377: 1023: 225: 91: 605:who gave me thanks for the addition. 7: 1424:Sports and games work group articles 1189:Request for eyes on from blp editors 281:This article is within the scope of 140:This article is within the scope of 1404:Biography articles of living people 915:as well as an article published in 80:It is of interest to the following 14: 1052:. Please take a moment to review 448:New information needs to be added 1439:Low-importance football articles 710:I am a regular volunteer at the 386:the Manchester United task force 346: 268: 258: 227: 191: 127: 117: 93: 62: 21:This article must adhere to the 362:the English football task force 321:This article has been rated as 207:the sports and games work group 164:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 1429:WikiProject Biography articles 1409:Start-Class biography articles 301:Knowledge:WikiProject Football 167:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1474:WikiProject Football articles 1434:Start-Class football articles 383:This article is supported by 359:This article is supported by 304:Template:WikiProject Football 295:and see a list of open tasks. 204:This article is supported by 24:biographies of living persons 1355:01:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC) 1332:16:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC) 1317:21:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC) 1304:15:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC) 1289:02:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC) 1275:10:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC) 1236:11:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC) 1223:09:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC) 930:23:58, 5 November 2014 (UTC) 691:Requested Third opinion (3O) 641:Knowledge is not a democracy 442:15:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC) 152:contribute to the discussion 1203:17:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 276:Association football portal 36:must be removed immediately 1490: 1147:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1045:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 327:project's importance scale 1007:21:54, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 988:20:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 976:17:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 957:16:44, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 944:16:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC) 906:17:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC) 886:09:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC) 866:05:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC) 848:19:30, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 833:16:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 809:14:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 793:12:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 765:23:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 746:15:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 731:13:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 705:13:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 593:12:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 573:22:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 555:22:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 492:21:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 478:12:54, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 382: 342: 320: 253: 187: 112: 88: 1184:22:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC) 685:11:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC) 671:01:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC) 651:12:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC) 634:11:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC) 618:21:31, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 417:18:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC) 1041:External links modified 785:Super Nintendo Chalmers 354:English football portal 379: 339: 184: 70:This article is rated 378: 338: 183: 143:WikiProject Biography 1208:After football edit. 1195:The Vintage Feminist 1128:regular verification 289:Association football 284:WikiProject Football 1118:After February 2018 1172:InternetArchiveBot 1123:InternetArchiveBot 380: 340: 185: 170:biography articles 76:content assessment 1277: 1261:comment added by 1148: 603:User:Okeyes (WMF) 432:comment added by 405: 404: 401: 400: 397: 396: 307:football articles 244:Manchester United 222: 221: 218: 217: 56: 55: 1481: 1387: 1382: 1347:Blueshiftofdeath 1182: 1173: 1146: 1145: 1124: 1105: 1071: 1050:Michael Knighton 1033: 1028: 827: 727: 721: 581:Teddy Sheringham 563:Teddy Sheringham 459:Official website 444: 356: 351: 350: 349: 309: 308: 305: 302: 299: 278: 273: 272: 262: 255: 254: 249: 246: 231: 224: 201: 196: 195: 194: 172: 171: 168: 165: 162: 148:join the project 137: 135:Biography portal 132: 131: 130: 121: 114: 113: 108: 106:Sports and Games 97: 90: 73: 67: 66: 58: 44:this noticeboard 16: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1383: 1379: 1210: 1191: 1176: 1171: 1139: 1132:have permission 1122: 1099: 1065: 1058:this simple FaQ 1043: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1029: 1025: 823: 753: 725: 717: 693: 480: 450: 427: 410: 352: 347: 345: 306: 303: 300: 297: 296: 274: 267: 247: 237: 197: 192: 190: 169: 166: 163: 160: 159: 133: 128: 126: 103: 74:on Knowledge's 71: 12: 11: 5: 1487: 1485: 1477: 1476: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1396: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1209: 1206: 1190: 1187: 1166: 1165: 1158: 1111: 1110: 1096: 1088:Added archive 1086: 1078:Added archive 1076: 1042: 1039: 1035: 1034: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 960: 959: 909: 908: 889: 888: 871: 869: 868: 836: 835: 819: 816: 796: 795: 752: 749: 734: 733: 719:TransporterMan 692: 689: 688: 687: 654: 653: 621: 620: 599:User:PeeJay2K3 576: 575: 497: 495: 494: 467: 449: 446: 409: 406: 403: 402: 399: 398: 395: 394: 391:Low-importance 381: 371: 370: 367:Low-importance 358: 357: 341: 331: 330: 323:Low-importance 319: 313: 312: 310: 293:the discussion 280: 279: 263: 251: 250: 248:Low‑importance 232: 220: 219: 216: 215: 212:Low-importance 203: 202: 186: 176: 175: 173: 139: 138: 122: 110: 109: 98: 86: 85: 79: 68: 54: 53: 49:this help page 33:poorly sourced 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1486: 1475: 1472: 1470: 1467: 1465: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1447: 1445: 1442: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1399: 1386: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1345:Exhibition." 1343: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1278: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1207: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1188: 1186: 1185: 1180: 1175: 1174: 1163: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1143: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1103: 1097: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1075: 1069: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1046: 1040: 1032: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 991: 990: 989: 986: 983: 979: 978: 977: 973: 969: 964: 963: 962: 961: 958: 955: 952: 948: 947: 946: 945: 941: 937: 932: 931: 927: 923: 918: 914: 907: 903: 899: 894: 891: 890: 887: 883: 879: 874: 873: 872: 867: 863: 859: 855: 852: 851: 850: 849: 845: 841: 834: 831: 828: 826: 820: 817: 813: 812: 811: 810: 806: 802: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 774: 769: 768: 767: 766: 762: 758: 750: 748: 747: 743: 739: 732: 728: 722: 720: 713: 712:Third Opinion 709: 708: 707: 706: 702: 698: 690: 686: 683: 680: 675: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 652: 649: 646: 642: 638: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 619: 616: 613: 608: 607: 606: 604: 600: 595: 594: 590: 586: 582: 574: 571: 568: 564: 559: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 543: 539: 538: 534: 528: 525: 521: 516: 514: 508: 506: 502: 493: 490: 487: 482: 481: 479: 475: 471: 466: 462: 460: 456: 447: 445: 443: 439: 435: 434:86.170.220.44 431: 423: 419: 418: 415: 407: 392: 389:(assessed as 388: 387: 377: 373: 372: 368: 365:(assessed as 364: 363: 355: 344: 337: 333: 332: 328: 324: 318: 315: 314: 311: 294: 290: 286: 285: 277: 271: 266: 264: 261: 257: 256: 252: 245: 241: 236: 233: 230: 226: 213: 210:(assessed as 209: 208: 200: 199:Sports portal 189: 182: 178: 177: 174: 157: 156:documentation 153: 149: 145: 144: 136: 125: 123: 120: 116: 115: 111: 107: 102: 99: 96: 92: 87: 83: 77: 69: 65: 60: 59: 51: 50: 45: 41: 37: 34: 30: 26: 25: 20: 18: 17: 1380: 1372: 1257:— Preceding 1211: 1192: 1170: 1167: 1142:source check 1121: 1115: 1112: 1047: 1044: 1026: 1018: 933: 910: 892: 870: 853: 837: 824: 797: 754: 735: 718: 694: 655: 622: 596: 577: 544: 540: 529: 517: 509: 496: 463: 451: 424: 420: 411: 384: 360: 322: 282: 205: 141: 82:WikiProjects 47: 35: 28: 22: 917:FourFourTwo 815:published). 428:—Preceding 72:Start-class 1398:Categories 1373:References 1179:Report bug 1019:References 858:FurrySings 825:MarshalN20 821:Regards.-- 545:Thanks. -- 1342:Rollotron 1324:Rollotron 1296:Rollotron 1263:Rollotron 1215:Rollotron 1162:this tool 1155:this tool 1102:dead link 1068:dead link 999:Dreylax01 968:Dreylax01 936:Dreylax01 922:Dreylax01 878:Dreylax01 840:Dreylax01 801:Dreylax01 757:Dreylax01 738:Dreylax01 697:Dreylax01 663:Dreylax01 626:Dreylax01 585:Dreylax01 547:Dreylax01 470:Dreylax01 414:Robdurbar 161:Biography 101:Biography 40:libellous 1271:contribs 1259:unsigned 1168:Cheers.— 995:(Mirror) 513:Triptych 430:unsigned 408:Untitled 298:Football 235:Football 1106:tag to 1072:tag to 1054:my edit 898:Collect 893:Comment 854:Comment 751:Comment 455:article 325:on the 240:England 1338:PeeJay 1098:Added 1064:Added 913:(here) 78:scale. 1351:talk 1328:talk 1300:talk 1267:talk 1219:talk 1199:talk 1003:talk 993:the 972:talk 940:talk 926:talk 902:talk 882:talk 862:talk 844:talk 805:talk 789:talk 777:here 773:here 761:talk 742:talk 726:TALK 701:talk 667:talk 659:here 630:talk 589:talk 551:talk 537:here 533:here 524:here 520:here 505:here 503:and 501:here 474:talk 438:talk 150:and 1314:Jay 1311:Pee 1286:Jay 1283:Pee 1233:Jay 1230:Pee 1136:RfC 1092:to 1082:to 985:Jay 982:Pee 954:Jay 951:Pee 682:Jay 679:Pee 648:Jay 645:Pee 615:Jay 612:Pee 570:Jay 567:Pee 489:Jay 486:Pee 317:Low 29:BLP 1400:: 1353:) 1330:) 1302:) 1273:) 1269:• 1221:) 1201:) 1149:. 1144:}} 1140:{{ 1104:}} 1100:{{ 1070:}} 1066:{{ 1005:) 974:) 942:) 928:) 904:) 884:) 876:-- 864:) 846:) 829:| 807:) 791:) 775:, 763:) 744:) 729:) 703:) 669:) 632:) 591:) 553:) 476:) 468:-- 440:) 393:). 369:). 242:/ 238:: 214:). 104:: 1349:( 1340:@ 1336:@ 1326:( 1298:( 1265:( 1217:( 1197:( 1181:) 1177:( 1164:. 1157:. 1001:( 970:( 938:( 924:( 900:( 880:( 860:( 842:( 803:( 787:( 759:( 740:( 723:( 699:( 665:( 628:( 587:( 549:( 472:( 436:( 329:. 158:. 84:: 52:. 27:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index