Talk:Pan-Slavism - Knowledge

1312:

original Hebrew fell into disuse centuries before the birth of Christ but diasporans all over the world maintained their faith). From an individual viewpoint, it is possible to say you are Czech, or Russian etc. without knowing a single word of the language: supposing a Czech couple move to the USA and raise their two children speaking to them entirely in English; this does actually happen, and the children may still feel Czech, or Czech-American, but without the language to pass down, it is unlikely that this practice will survive three generations (of Czechs only marrying other Czechs who have lost their language). Meanwhile, looking at it from the angle of an entire group of people, let us take the Rumelians of Bulgaria, united since the creation of the modern Bulgarian republic. Supposing the Rumelians claimed that they were NOT Slavic (which they don't) but descended from a group of people to occupy the Balkans some centuries earlier, called, the Rumelians, then the only way that they would have converted language to the point that their original language has been erased would be for some Slavic presence among them. Now, as there is no region today in the Slavic language countries where the majority claim to be non-Slavic and a small group of

961:

artificial creation. The English expression "German" had been derived from Latin sources for historical comtemplations and examinations, regarding ancient Roman Empire. The Brits did so, while French scientists and authors preferred "allemand", when not precisely talking about ancient history such as Ceasars invasion of "Gallica" and "Germania superior". At a certain point in history, the expression in old Latin sources was used by British salesmen to distiguish between the Netherlands (Deutsch - Dutch), where the Rhine ends in the Sea, and the upper Rhineland (Deutsch - "German"), when trading goods. Step by step, English authors, historians and politicians, as well as ordinary people, joined in this use of the newly coined expression. So in fact, this expression "German" is an artificial British creation, mixing up the original content of the Latin sources with modern misconceptions. This leads to even more misconceptions, and these misconceptions affect similar creations of words, such as "Pan-Slavism". "Pan-Slavism" in a positive sense would be based on language and culture, but definitely not on violence, not on racism or nationalism, and especially

1278:

and than killing usual people as "appropriate" and as in reach. This shows that Polish nationalism and Polish racism might be very enthusiastic about Panslavism, but only under total Polish domination, rule or even better, total military command. Additional problem is religious: Poland always claims to be ultra-catholic, while most slavic people are orthodox. Therefore the killing of orthodox priest has been an important task in the eyes of Polish nationalists. Nevertheless, Polish elite always claimed the Polish nation to be the best of all slavic nations. Fun fact: Nobody is able to define what "slavic" truely might be, apart from similarities in slavic langugages. This is not a surprise when you look at the timeline. In fact a small group of "slavic" invaders started dominating gallo-illyric population not earlier than 6th to 8th century. "Slavisation" of Europe is relatively young and, apart from Polish or Russian made massacres, was rather based on making people share invaders' langugage than killing the original inhabitants of Central Europe.

1123:@ Simon, you consider Europeans "genetically all very similiar because europe was re-populated after the last ice age entirely from two refugia - balkans and iberia". This is not true, as there had been continous settlement in the very core of Europe, a "green belt" (no glaciers, i.e. fertile green land in summer, however with a shortend vegetation period, especially compared to the era of man-made climate change) between the Pyrenees and Ukraine. The area in the center of Europe - namely France and Germany - had been continuously populated in that time. This has been proven again and again by numerous archeological findings, and we still keep on getting new, more precise information on this. Okay, unfortunately, England had been covered with glaciers and also had been a part of the continent, in fact a "part of France" in that time. The Rhine river ended East of the highlands and mountains of to todays Scotland, which had been a complete ice desert, covered with massive glaciers, as the Gulf Stream had collapsed before... 1316:(all be it 2%) can claim to have continued their Slavic identity, it is clear that the people mixed and one group has assimilated the other! If the Slavs were originally a smaller group and now the communal name for the people is the same as that of the larger group (ie. Rumelians - bearing in mind this is only an example), one might be forgiven for assuming that the 2% Slavs were dissimilated by the 98% Rumelians, but given that it was the Rumelians who abandoned their languages, it is fairer to say that they became Slavic. So, wherever there is a Slavic language community, be it the whole of Slovakia, or the pockets of Sorbs in Germany, or the Krashovans of Romania, you can be sure that there is a line of descent in the Slavs of the first millennium AD even if this trace is thin. -- 1326:

This includes areas that became "truely Slavic soil" due to Russian settlement policy, please take a look at the Baltics. Massive Russian domination over a non-Slavic population, step by step pushed into the role of a "weird" minority under "good Slavic rule". Original population had been killed, deported or suppressed, and forced to speak Russian. According to Russia, the Baltics therefore still are "Slavic soil". However, original population in the Baltics never accepted "Russification" of their countries, while Pan-Slavistic ideologists still wish to eliminate this original population by various means. As Russia had been the most successfull

1331:

By the way, there is a striking example in very modern times: Take a look at the map and see what has happended to former Prussia, especially to Kaliningrad region. Population had been killed or deported, Russian settlement policy has been implemented for decades, and surprise, surprise, this region is "Slavic soil of mother Russia" now. Only nation being completely opposed to this is Poland, because they have an anti-Russian conception of Pan-Slavism: A Pan-Slavism under strict Polish domination and rule. Related racial and colonial aspects to be included...

1781:, which excludes non-slavic territories included in the other map. Russia is not exclusevely Russian. Crimea is culturally tatar (turkic), southern Slovakia is hungarian (Finno-Ugric), northern Serbia (Vojvodina) is ethnically diverse, and Kosovo is albanian. The istria peninsula and its coasts are istriot and istro-romanian (reason why Italy demanded it after WW1), the Sudetenland was german by the time of the peak of pan-slavism, and in southern Bessarabia and northern Dobruja there's a significant bulgarian minority, which is not shown in the map 546: 1651:

shortly after Stalin signed a pact with Hitler and assaulted Ukraine, Finland, the Baltics and Poland, massacring and deporting millions of people... Fun Fact: "Stalin was not a Slav" - Hitler was no German either. Mathilde Ludendorff even claimed, Hitler was a "homosexual Czech Jew, raised in Austria". Stalin had been an orthodox priest apprentice once, and so cynical in his attitudes that he used anything for his advantage he could get in his hands. Let's be realistic: These were very weird people, full of contradictions, weren't they?

1090:

bring them more in relation with the Serbs, which in their eyes would make the Croats an easy target for assimilation in the South Slav, Yugoslav nation (hence the identical language, name giving, similar folklore to other fellow Slavs). Even today there is a slight antipathy in the rightwing, concerning the Slavs, mostly because of Yugoslavia - since they lived for ca. 900 years in Hungary and Habsburg Empire later on, they feel more sympathy for the "Germanic Europe" instead of "Slavic one".

200: 359: 338: 935:

level as the actual Pan-Slavism, would be a movement trying to unite all Germanic people: Germans, Scandinavians, Dutch, English... However such a movement never existed and the very idea sounds totally unrealistic. The fact that Pan-Slavism on the other hand was a real, credible movement, whit much support in all of the respective countries makes it pretty unique. This uniqueness should be emphasized and, if possible, its causes explained.

856:

think that Pilsudski wanted some sort of federation (with Poland dominating it) of former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth states (eg. Belarus, Ukraine). Eventually, he simply occupied some of those areas but otherwise they might've become parts of the USSR which he didn't want. I can't pick the sources so I'm not writing it in Knowledge but if someone were really interested the topic, they might do some research. (added by 85.221.134.193)

566: 254: 233: 457: 426: 1754:. There should be more facts and less "strong believes" in the good sake of pan-slavic nationalism. What is a Serbian aristocrate good for in Slovakia and maybe even the Czech lands? What is the plot? Will he convert to catholizism to win the hearts of Slovaks, or even become a crypto-protestant to please (anti-Habsburg) Czech elite? What about the Polish minority in Austria-Hungary? All of this doesn't make any sense. 264: 598: 684:(vmerunka@gmail.com) I have many professional contacts to all Slavic countries (also in Russia and Serbia, dear FkpCascais :-) ) and I hope my adding (regardless it was strong) is important and based on proven sources. I believe, that Knowledge respects the position of neutrality and does not serve in any propaganda, which tries removes discomfortable information in order to make "the reality better". 1048:

Europe? I don't think so. What kind of pan-western European ideal are you talking about? The nations within the EU fight over everything, including the common agricultural policy and the spread of the Euro dollar. Are you telling me that Panslavism is really a reality today just because "slavicmsnifestdestiny193" says he will join such a movement? Be realistic the movement is long dead. -ColinMacDonald

191: 1150:

were less enthusiastic then Russian Empire of the Soviet Union. Second, how is sarmatism an expression of some 'anti-Slavism', and how again this can be used to explain Polish hostility towards Ruthenians (but not Lithuanians or themselves, for example?). This entire sentence makes little sense and unless proper academic references are provided, it should be deleted as unverifiable POV.--

467: 643: 1039:

to make too strong comparisons between Pan Germanism and Pan Slavism. I would argue that while Pan Germanism is largely based on an idea of some kind of single German race, Pan Slavism is based on a multinational idea, more comparable to something like Pan Western Europeanism , a concept without any historical roots in Western Europe --Colin MacDonald

957:"Pan-Slavism" has sometimes been a very violent and aggressive movement, often based on racial believes where it should have been based on language and culture. When Pan-Slavism became dominated and captured by Russia, it became really bad, assassinating people was an appreciated method, whenever suitable... 1298:

I would like to discuss the use of this word. I changed it to "countries with slavic national languages", which I think is much more precise. Somebody changed it back using the argument "languages have nothing to do with this, slavic origin means founded and mostly inhabited by Slavic peoples". Now,

1043:

Since when Hungarians and Romanians are Slavs? And sometimes personal point of view is more representative than "official" and "acceptable" ones.Anyway,Colin,could you kindly tell me (personal,of course:)) why today's European union cannot be called just poor-covered Pan-western idea, dominating over

1038:

Just because you disagree and would join such a movement does not mean that it would gain wide spread popularity. You are ignoring tensions all through out Eastern Europe between all slavs (Ukraine-Russia, Poland-Russia, Hungarians-Romanians, Serbs and Croats etc). I think we must also be careful not

855:

I have heard that there were some talks on West-Slavic federation between Czechoslovakia and Poland during the exile of both governments in London. I heard it several years in some documentary on Polish TV but can't say anymore about it. It really hasn't been ever a particularly popular idea. Also, I

1650:

Nope. Stalin used anything he got in hands. Of course "Soviet Union" used nationalism, racism and separatism whereever helpful for their imperial expansion and colonial projects. Remember his words about "the great national war of our peace-seeking slavic brother nations against fascist aggression",

1277:

In fact, Polish nationalists massacred about 2 million Ukrainians during 1918 und 1920, with support from France and England, of course. Main target was to avert an independent Ukrainian nation, eliminating Ukrainian population with a focus on "Intelligenzia", i.e. preferably killing educated people

1237:

was an expression of insufficient identification of Poles with their Slavic derivation. What else should have caused this feverish seeking for other roots? The Polish hostility towards Ruthenians showed itself in the discrimination of their belief, language and traditions. Ukrainians and Belarusians

1180:

Two wrongs don't make a right. And note that the notice at PWNB notes 'Articles needing attention' and sais nothing about vandalism. Would you dispute that this article needs attention? Not that Voyevoda additions are any better then worst of Molobo's, and I think you called his actions with the 'v'

1162:

I believe Voyevoda's sentence is just a reaction to Molobo's severe trolling. It was Molobo who denied any connection of the Poles to the Slavs and routinely changed "Slavic languages" to "Eastern and South Slavic languages", so as not to include Polish into the category. By the way, Piotrus, I hope

1149:

This is strange - it's the first time I heard that Poland was 'not very enthusiastic' about it's Slavic origins. Where had the Poles denied they are Slavs? And how do you measure enthusiasm? Of course, unlike Russians, Poles never tried to unite ALL Slavs under their guidance, so I guess they indeed

1022:

Tricky thing, as Russia and Poland always tried o dominate the movement - and tended to pervert it. So today, which side would you like to join: Great Russia, "mother of all Slavs", or the free Republic of Ukraine? Yes, this question seems to be quite unfair. However: True "Pan-Slavism", in the best

960:

Regarding "Pan-Germanism": This expression is misleading, as the English word "German" is definitely not used in the same sense on the European continent and gives a wrong connotation. In particular, it is not a German word for "Deutsch" (in the Northern dialect Plattdeutsch "Dutch"), but a somewhat

900:

Furthermore, the idea of Pan-Slavism was present in various forms before 1815, in was the strongest in Russia and in what was Yugoslavia. The 815 was only a turning point. Anyone with some knowledge on pre-1815 Pan-Slavism can add some info on the article. I have too little information on that some

1873:

Slavs (and even then, not much is common between them apart from belonging to the same language family), but one showing geographic distribution of Slavic languages. Furthermore, this specific version of the map seems to have been created just to separate Serbo-Croatian along ethnic lines, contrary

1330:

colonial power in Europe, an excessive "slavification" had always been one of the major goals of Russian nationalism and imperialism. In fact, this can been seen and checked in detail almost everywhere in Eastern Europe, as it holds true for a lot of regions that became overrun, looted and annexed.

1325:

You are rather describing the dark sides of an ideology included in "Pan-Slavism": Whereever people live, that have any origin claimed to be "Slavic" or who's ancestors had spoken the language of Orthodox mission in Eastern Europe, Pan-Slavism declares this piece of land to be "truely Slavic soil".

1600:

The pact with Hitler was very contradictory to the ideology as well. Additionally, Stalin always talked about the "peace-loving Slavic nations, united in the Soviet Union" - and attacked almost all nations surounding his "Soviet Union", including such "peace-loving Slavic nations" such as Ukraine,

1465:

Saying basically that Poles were never interested in pan-Slavism and all saw it as an agent of Russian imperialism is a bit much. It was never a widespread, popular movement, but it had significant support among some segments of the academic and political elite in the 19th century, and was debated

1408:

It should also be emphasized that Pan-Slavism also had a reactionary nature, especially in the Carpathian Basin where (especially Slovak Pan-Slavists like Stúr or Hurban-Vajansky) they wanted to subjugate the whole area to Czarist Russia and in support of the Habsburg monarchy, they fought against

934:

Pan-Germanism is not in any way equal to Pan-Slavism. Germans are just one Germanic nation, and what is called "Pan-Germanism" is nothing more than German nationalism one level below Pan-Slavism. It is actually one the same level as Russian nationalism would be. 'Real' Pan-Germansims, on the same

850:

The whole article is completely distorted and full of wrong information especially on a situation in the XXth century. ex, in Poland the pan-slavism has never been an issue, it's not even discussed or supported by any major or minor party. The only considerable possibility for a Western pan-Slavic

683:

Dear wikipedists, I ask Your community for independent and collaborative review of my amendments made today from IP 193.84.36.110 (I am not a wikipedist), which are permanently removed by FkpCascais, who alleged me for the anti-Russian sentiment. My real name is assoc. prof. Vojtěch Merunka, Ph.D.

1311:

Not so much a counter though the term "origins" is better. It's true that language is the only thing which unites Slavic people but then it's the only thing that unites anyone anywhere at all, unless they are united by a surviving phenomenon, such as a religion (maybe the Jews are a good example,

875:

The article talks of pan-slavism as a serious option considered by many as an alternative which isn't the case. Any comparaison with pan-germanism or pan-arabism is out of touch since we speak different languages rather than different dialects as it is the case in these two cases. Anyways a major

1089:

Eventhough Juraj Krizanic the Panslavist was a Croat, and the idea of Yugoslavia was a Croatian one, Croats didn't identify themselves as Slavs, but Goths, in the WW2, Croats being on Germany's side it was mostly because of shame being a second grade citizen in the Third Reich. Being Slavs would

1047:

The European Union is an economic union, with no roots in race. Poland or any other Eastern European country don't have to join, its their choice. Granted Magyars and Romanians are not slavs, but is the personal opinion of one Slavic nationalist going to over rule ethnic tension all over Eastern

1066:

I think the new movement now is Europeanism. This is based on certain genetic, cultural and circumstantial reasons. Europeans are the most closely related people, compared to any other region. Genetically all very similiar because europe was re-populated after the last ice age entirely from two

929:

No, the stuff broke out during the Napoleonic Wars. Pan-Germanism refers to the German nationalism that allowed Bismarckian Prussia to take over its neighbouring states. The Second Reich resulted; Germany was only an Empire in a stable form from 1870, before which it was a mess of kingdoms (and

921:

I don't know that there is pan-Germanism in the way that there was pan-Slavism, perhaps because Germany was its own empire when this stuff broke out. That said, I think that there might now be a type of pan-German movement based on the resentment of losing two world wars (and one world cup) --

880:

Slavic languages are so alike that they might be easily considered dialects if it were what one wanted. The region boundary (south-east-west) may be a bit strong but within the particular subdivisional areas the languages are pretty comprehensible for each others' speakers (still, much more in

1725:

In the section "Pan-Slavism in Russia" it uses the word "regime" instead of "government" in order to describe the current governing body of the Russian Federation. I think that the word "government" would be a more accurate and less biased word to use in this situation and that "regime" has a

1076:

You are correct, Pan-Slavism is not dead. And it need not be a political idea either, it can be a cultural one. I suggest that Pan-Slavism can play a role in a future peaceful Europe, imagine the Balkans today if narrow minded regionalism (I refuse to call it nationalism) had not taken such a

1895:

The map I cited differentiates between all serbian dialects (bosnian, Croatian and serbian). Those linguistical varieties coincide with real ethnic groups. The whole point of pan-slavism was to unite the slavs. Could use other maps? Yeah, but they should be ethno-linguistical, not political.

1798:

Pan-Slavism is a contemporary ideology and a contemporary main map is perfectly fine. All the countries represented on the map have Slavic-speaking majorities. A geopolitical unification of these countries would most likely not result in renouncing territories with non-Slavic majorities, and

1421:

Leaders ofSeptember uprising - Stur, Hurban and Hodza wanted from Habsburg court indepndent Slovak duchy- It was their official proposal. Stur idea of all Slavic states under Czarist Russia was motivate by that that Russia was in that time only independent Slavic country - that´s all. Don´t

1601:

Poland and Slovakia. By the way: Official language under Stalin's rule always had been Russian, of course. Multiculturalism was quite limited in this Russian "Red Slavic Empire" when it came to essential questions of racism, ethnic domination, geo-politics and imperial expansion.

1773:

Pan-slavism is am ethnic ideology. Most of these kind of ideologies do not talk about uniting explicitly countries, but about ethnic groups, and that includes parts of countries, not necessarily an entire geopolitical entity, because countries are ethnically diverse.

1062:

Thirdly pan -slavism is not dead. Yes the oomph is gone , but the sense of brotherhood remains. I accept that any political unioin is out of the question, and history has shown that the slavs are unfortunatley more contecnt on destroying each other than helping..

1851:. An ethnic map is more appropriate to describe an ethnic nationalist ideology that has never been the basis for geopolitcal unions between current countries in their geopolitical borders. The pan-slavism didn't want to unite current countries (see 1519:

BTW, there IS ONE very small political panslavic party in Poland: "Zwiazek Słowiański". It started in local elections in województwo podlaskie and got huge 0.32% of votes. Nevertheless, one small party is more than "none", as it is put in article.

1144:

Poland never was very enthusiastic about its Slavic roots, anyway, and this attitude regularily found its expressions, as well in the ideology of sarmatism, as in the hostilities towards the culture of its Slavic neighbours like Ukrainians oder

1044:

whole continent? Yes,Poland and other eastern countries are members of union now,but do they really participate or simply follow the general path of much greater powers,like Germany or France? And that is pan-westernism. --All the best,Simon

1855:). Current "pan-slavist" ideologies are not uniform nor homogenous in their objective, they have no academic value, there's no consensus on their views, so we can't talk about an ideology per se, a statement that this very article comments. 575: 440: 1888:

No, pan-slavism is not an ideology anymore, the term can be used to describe any kind of idea to unite any slavic peoples, countries or alliances but, as the article says, there's no more pan-slavist ideology after WW1 with academic

1058:

Secondly you aliken pan-slavism to pan-western europeanism. Pan _slavism is based on actual common origins and culture of slavic people. Western europe comprises of Germanics, Iberians, Romans, etc. No commonality except location

922:

unfortunately, this also seems to tie into many of the the right-wing German nationalist groups, some of which are so extreme that they are illegal under Germany's constitution. Interestingly enough, the US would allow them...!

2016: 2011: 153: 1745:

This part of the article seems to be biased, as there are some weird details, presented without sound sources. In particular, there is no explanation why a Habsburg, or anyone else, should be in favor of a

1675:

Venice had been the predominant power in Northern Italy and surounding shores including Slovenia and Croatia over centuries. The new nation, modern Italy, simply continued what Venice had done before.

1238:

were called "bydlo" and were often forced to change the street side, when a Pole came along. All that is not being told in Poland so the Poles sincerely wonder, why things like Volhynia 1944 occured.

1727: 792: 1869:

Pan-Slavism may have low relevance today, but it still exists nevertheless, hence me describing it contemporary. Your suggested alternative map does not represent geographic distribution of

1466:

fairly stridently. For the pro-pan-slavism side, I'm thinking of people like Ignacy Rakowiecki, Zorian Dołęga-Chodakowski, Henryk Rzewski, Michal Grabowski, Waclaw Maciejowski, and so on. --

555: 436: 1703: 1299:

in my opinion the definion of "Slavic people" is "people speaking a Slavic language" and we are back at languages, which justifies the phrase I introduced. Any counter-argument?

1996: 1946: 753:: Russia and Europe, where it is rendered the decadent West in opposition to the God's blessed Russian civilization. Today, this 150 years old propaganda continues extended by 1731: 609: 1355:

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

147: 888:

Dialects are mutually intelligible, sort of. For me Slavic languages are not, without lot of effort (exception: Czech - Slovak). But I am not language gifted, YMMW.

2006: 2001: 1951: 1070:

Secondly there is the growing discntent amongst europeans against migrations from Africa, middle east etc, that are decaying the cultural entegrity of europe.

1976: 1936: 398: 1055:

You classified Romanians and Hungarians as slavs. Anyone with a most BASIC knowledge of history knows that they are 'Romanised' Dacians and Magyars, resp.

1941: 408: 79: 749:, suddenly turned 180 degrees and started to hate and blame the West for Russia's military setbacks. It is well described in the propagandistic book of 1961: 1931: 320: 310: 836:

Slavic Unity. Special issue of the news "Russky vestnik" Nr 16-17 (930-931), texts from the XII. Pan-slavic congress in Moscow, May 2015 (in Russian)

776:

I have more sources. For example other documents from the XII. Pan-slavic congress in Moscow, May 2015 and books by the current pan-slavic president

1991: 1981: 1971: 526: 204: 536: 1966: 1956: 377:

and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

85: 2021: 1986: 1429: 1097: 930:

before 1815 it was "united" under the superficial Holy Roman Empire and its leaders, the Hapsburgs of Austria; this was the First Reich).

1007:

many slavs would not be willing to participate in any kind of pan-slavic movement. just look at the situation of the serbs and croats...

1926: 1661: 1395: 286: 44: 1585: 1546: 1487: 942: 796: 1501:

Well, Poland was not interested in panslavism per se (as in Russian movement), but in other versions of unity of Slavs. For example,

1843:. And the map of today's countries doesn't represent other slavic peoples who would be included in the original Pan-slavism such as 1755: 1676: 1602: 1332: 1279: 1124: 1024: 966: 502: 1631:

Not really ceded, they just moved it from one administrative region to another. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union at the time.

1616:

Still, they used it when it was to their advantage. They ceded the Crimea to Ukraine as a token of Slavic friendship after WWII.

369: 343: 1555:

Disagree: Historical Dictionary of Poland, 966-1945 -Page 419 autor: Jerzy Jan Lerski, Piotr Wróbel, Richard J. Kozicki - 1996

1699: 1692: 1083:

Still pains me to see the gulf between Serbs and Croats for example, how did we ever get to this stage of hating our own kind?

99: 30: 277: 238: 104: 20: 1660:

Venice ceased to exist as a republic in 1797, Italy was about to form. So there is something wrong with the introduction. --

168: 74: 691: 628: 605: 498: 480: 431: 213: 135: 65: 1892:

I suggested an etno-linguistical map because it defines better the pan-slavic objectives than modern country borders.

1646:

The assertion that the Soviet Union used panslavism as a political tool is absurd. For one, Stalin was not a Slav.

1018:

I disagree. I would be willing to participate in such a movement with my fellow Slavs. -- slavicmanifestdestiny193

624: 1706:. The deletion discussion would benefit from input from editors with a knowledge of and interest in Pan-Slavism. 1574:

Obviously the USSR didn't promote the rise of one ethnicity over another. That is contradictory to the ideology.

1778: 1052:

Colin MacDonald: You have shown your ignorance on the matter, so your opinions are automatically discredited.

851:

state was in the XIth century and since then no such idea in Polish history was ever taken into consideration.

1433: 1101: 190: 1665: 1451:

How this is connected to pan-slavic ideas? Probably it is Russification policy that triggered the protests?--

129: 1589: 1550: 1491: 1392: 946: 545: 109: 1759: 1680: 1606: 1336: 1283: 1128: 1028: 970: 1848: 1818: 1777:

The main map is about today's countries, and doesn't represent the original pan-slavism. I suggest to use

1114: 616: 1901: 1860: 1788: 990: 627:

may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the

1822: 485: 219: 125: 917:. The 'English Speaking Union' is not the equivalent - Anglo-Americanism? I dunno. --MichaelTinkler 1359: 608:

procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been

1581: 1542: 1483: 1425: 1093: 938: 914: 889: 864: 788: 746: 965:

on any Polish or Russian colonial domination. We should try to keep all of these contents separate.

722:, but wanted to have a strong ally in their own independent cultural and political development (see 1814: 1704:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 8#Countries and territories by language family

835: 620: 175: 161: 55: 662:

on 15 July 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see

285:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1829: 1471: 1389: 750: 70: 1410: 1711: 1636: 1502: 1269: 1255: 1218: 1185: 1167:

on the Polish notice-board. If you do, please take care. Trolling is strongly frowned upon. --

1154: 669: 655: 51: 1832:, it dreams of uniting ethnicities, not a political movement of uniting geopolitcal entities. 1702:

be deleted. This article is related to that category. The relevant discussion is located at

1564: 1525: 1510: 1201: 1168: 983: 703: 358: 337: 1840: 1621: 1300: 1251:

History by Voyevoda is fascinating, but care to provide any references backing your POV?--

1200:

Your edit summary lists it as an "article vandalised". Please don't think we are blind. --

715: 269: 1265:

I am still waiting for any citations. Otherwise this original research will be deleted.--

141: 1897: 1879: 1856: 1804: 1784: 1726:

emotional bias and in this case it would probably also used with political motivations

1010: 986: 766: 723: 707: 565: 769:. It expresses fierce populism, nostalgia for the Soviet era, and strong anti-Western 263: 253: 232: 1920: 1813:

The original Pan-slavist ideology is not contemporary. Pan-slavism originated in the

1467: 1239: 906: 777: 472: 597: 1836: 1707: 1632: 1452: 1317: 1266: 1252: 1215: 1182: 1151: 754: 824: 456: 425: 373:, a collaborative effort to improve the Knowledge coverage of articles related to 1852: 1560: 1521: 1506: 1379: 1372: 1365: 910: 758: 742: 718:). The other Slavic nations refused to the ethnic and political merger with the 659: 24: 745:, when the Russian elite, who previously had uncritically admired and imitated 1617: 462: 374: 259: 1835:

The fact is that that map is not appropriate. "Majority" is a relative term.

1875: 1800: 1234: 1023:

sense, should be based on langugae and culture not on war between brothers.

770: 711: 730:

do not understand till today, because speak about betrayal of Slavic idea,

825:

Report about the XII. Pan-slavic congress in Moscow, May 2015 (in Russian)

710:

tried to misuse Slavism as a tool for spreading its power and governance (

923: 282: 781: 979: 881:

writing than speaking but it can be trained). (added by 85.221.134.193)

741:

Political panslavism lasts from 60s of the 19th century after the lost

735: 731: 727: 719: 699: 695: 694:, there is an on-going conflict between the concept of panslavism in 489: 497:

Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the

1905: 1883: 1864: 1808: 1792: 1763: 1735: 1715: 1684: 1669: 1640: 1625: 1610: 1593: 1568: 1529: 1514: 1495: 1475: 1455: 1437: 1413: 1398: 1360:

http://www.princeton.edu/~gradconf/index_files/papers/Babiracki.pdf

1340: 1320: 1303: 1287: 1271: 1257: 1242: 1220: 1204: 1187: 1171: 1156: 1132: 1117: 1105: 1032: 1013: 994: 974: 950: 892: 867: 800: 1844: 1165:

call this typical and quite harmless content dispute "vandalism"

762: 637: 592: 184: 15: 1209:

Well, Ghirla, perhaps you should check your eyes. Or are you

564: 544: 2017:

Demographics and ethnography of Russia task force articles

2012:

Start-Class Russia (demographics and ethnography) articles

615:

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the

863:

Never heard about the Czechoslovakian thing. Show a ref.

1799:

vice-versa for other countries with a Slavic diaspora. –

1505:. Main point were Slavic unity yes, but without Russia. 1480:

The Poles do not have any doubts that they are Slavs.

1210: 1164: 664: 650: 160: 576:

the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force

281:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1539:Pan-slavism was NOT promoted by the Soviet Union. 1535:Pan-slavism was NOT promoted by the Soviet Union. 1557:Pan-Slavism was used again by Soviet propaganda. 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1815:wave of nationalisms in the middle of the 19th 1213:? If so, I'd think we are both offended :: --> 1817:century, it was one of the key points on the 1741:"Pan-Slavism in the Czech lands and Slovakia" 174: 8: 1997:High-importance Start-Class Russia articles 1947:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in History 668:; for the discussion at that location, see 188: 1422:manipulate with informations like these. 1382:on Thu Jul 27 01:26:58 2006, 404 Not Found 1375:on Mon Jul 17 17:57:38 2006, 404 Not Found 1368:on Sun Jul 16 21:32:37 2006, 404 Not Found 1139:Citation needed for suspicious information 786: 420: 332: 227: 1839:, and Bulgarian is not s majority in the 1700:Category:Slavic countries and territories 1693:Category:Slavic countries and territories 1447:Pan-Slavism in the grand duchy of Finland 1163:you do not follow Molobo's way when you 1728:2600:1007:A105:48E4:8F03:D4D3:D36B:D0C7 811: 422: 334: 229: 1769:Countries ≠ Ethnicities: incorrect map 1721:On Regime vs Government as Word Choice 1461:Polish section is a bit oversimplified 1409:Kossuth's freedom fighters in 1848-49. 793:2A00:1028:8D1E:F5DE:85B7:6B64:678C:901 2007:History of Russia task force articles 2002:Start-Class Russia (history) articles 1952:Start-Class vital articles in History 1267:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1253:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1216:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1183:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1152:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 876:clean-up of this article is needed. 782:http://www.labirint.ru/authors/35471/ 757:. Panslavism is popular in the large 7: 1698:It is currently being proposed that 478:This article is within the scope of 275:This article is within the scope of 1977:High-importance Yugoslavia articles 1937:Knowledge vital articles in History 1837:Serbian is not a majority in Kosovo 218:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 1942:Start-Class level-5 vital articles 14: 1962:Mid-importance politics articles 1932:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 1828:The original Pan-slavism was an 913:, and whatever else works under 641: 596: 556:the history of Russia task force 465: 455: 424: 383:Knowledge:WikiProject Yugoslavia 357: 336: 262: 252: 231: 198: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1992:High-importance Russia articles 1982:WikiProject Yugoslavia articles 1972:Start-Class Yugoslavia articles 1067:refugia - balkans and iberia. 531:This article has been rated as 403:This article has been rated as 386:Template:WikiProject Yugoslavia 315:This article has been rated as 1825:, and has low relevance today. 1456:20:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 1106:21:36, 19 September 2011 (UTC) 441:Demographics & ethnography 295:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 1967:WikiProject Politics articles 1957:Start-Class politics articles 1874:to the idea of Pan-Slavism. – 1841:bulgarian turkish communities 1641:05:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC) 1476:07:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 1438:08:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC) 1294:countries with slavic origins 801:12:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC) 629:contentious topics procedures 573:This article is supported by 553:This article is supported by 298:Template:WikiProject Politics 289:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1716:11:59, 13 January 2020 (UTC) 1553:) 05:19, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1118:03:00, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1014:12:17, 5 November 2005 (UTC) 726:). That some politicians in 511:Knowledge:WikiProject Russia 2022:WikiProject Russia articles 1987:Start-Class Russia articles 1830:ethnic nationalist ideology 1414:07:56, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 765:to Slavic countries of the 514:Template:WikiProject Russia 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2038: 1927:Start-Class vital articles 1736:04:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC) 1569:11:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC) 1530:07:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 1496:05:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 1272:22:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1258:17:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 1243:08:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 1221:22:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1211:confusing me with Voyevoda 1205:05:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC) 1188:17:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 1172:07:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC) 1157:23:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC) 692:Congress in Prague in 1848 537:project's importance scale 409:project's importance scale 321:project's importance scale 1906:02:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC) 1823:currently extinct country 1399:05:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 1304:09:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 951:21:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC) 631:before editing this page. 572: 552: 530: 488:dedicated to coverage of 450: 402: 352: 314: 247: 226: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 1884:21:39, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 1865:01:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 1809:18:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 1793:21:48, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 1626:16:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 1594:20:09, 2 June 2008 (UTC) 1515:10:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC) 1321:13:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 995:22:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 893:17:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 868:17:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC) 625:normal editorial process 1819:formation of Yugoslavia 1764:09:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 1685:09:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 1670:22:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC) 1611:09:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 1341:09:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 1288:08:41, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 1133:11:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 1033:10:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 975:08:24, 5 May 2023 (UTC) 612:as a contentious topic. 501:, or contribute to the 367:is within the scope of 1849:bessarabian bulgarians 1750:prince to be ruler of 621:standards of behaviour 569: 549: 370:WikiProject Yugoslavia 75:avoid personal attacks 1691:Proposed deletion of 648:The contents of the 568: 548: 205:level-5 vital article 100:Neutral point of view 915:romantic nationalism 747:Western civilisation 617:purpose of Knowledge 278:WikiProject Politics 105:No original research 1181:word quite often.-- 846:the whole situation 780:, see his books at 389:Yugoslavia articles 1404:Reactionary nature 751:Nikolay Danilevsky 687:This is my text: 606:contentious topics 570: 550: 503:project discussion 481:WikiProject Russia 214:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1596: 1584:comment added by 1554: 1545:comment added by 1498: 1486:comment added by 1440: 1428:comment added by 1115:God Save the Tsar 1096:comment added by 941:comment added by 803: 791:comment added by 702:nations speaking 676: 675: 636: 635: 591: 590: 587: 586: 583: 582: 419: 418: 415: 414: 331: 330: 327: 326: 301:politics articles 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2029: 1618:Gerard von Hebel 1579: 1540: 1481: 1423: 1108: 953: 901:I can' do that. 838: 833: 827: 822: 816: 761:from the former 704:Slavic languages 667: 645: 644: 638: 600: 593: 519: 518: 515: 512: 509: 475: 470: 469: 468: 459: 452: 451: 446: 443: 428: 421: 391: 390: 387: 384: 381: 361: 354: 353: 348: 340: 333: 303: 302: 299: 296: 293: 272: 267: 266: 256: 249: 248: 243: 235: 228: 211: 202: 201: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1917: 1916: 1771: 1743: 1723: 1696: 1658: 1537: 1463: 1449: 1406: 1353: 1296: 1141: 1091: 1005: 936: 890:Pavel Vozenilek 865:Pavel Vozenilek 848: 843: 842: 841: 834: 830: 823: 819: 813: 784: 716:Orthodox Church 681: 663: 642: 619:, any expected 533:High-importance 517:Russia articles 516: 513: 510: 507: 506: 495:To participate: 471: 466: 464: 445:High‑importance 444: 434: 405:High-importance 388: 385: 382: 379: 378: 347:High‑importance 346: 300: 297: 294: 291: 290: 270:Politics portal 268: 261: 241: 212:on Knowledge's 209: 199: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2035: 2033: 2025: 2024: 2019: 2014: 2009: 2004: 1999: 1994: 1989: 1984: 1979: 1974: 1969: 1964: 1959: 1954: 1949: 1944: 1939: 1934: 1929: 1919: 1918: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1893: 1890: 1833: 1826: 1770: 1767: 1742: 1739: 1722: 1719: 1695: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1644: 1643: 1614: 1613: 1576: 1575: 1536: 1533: 1462: 1459: 1448: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1430:85.216.154.233 1405: 1402: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1376: 1369: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1246: 1245: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1175: 1174: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1098:178.191.179.29 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1051: 1042: 1036: 1035: 1004: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 958: 933: 927: 919: 904: 898: 897: 896: 895: 883: 882: 873: 872: 871: 870: 858: 857: 847: 844: 840: 839: 828: 817: 810: 809: 805: 775: 767:European Union 734:thinking, and 724:Austro-Slavism 708:Russian Empire 680: 677: 674: 673: 646: 634: 633: 601: 589: 588: 585: 584: 581: 580: 571: 561: 560: 551: 541: 540: 529: 523: 522: 520: 493: 492:on Knowledge. 477: 476: 460: 448: 447: 429: 417: 416: 413: 412: 401: 395: 394: 392: 362: 350: 349: 341: 329: 328: 325: 324: 317:Mid-importance 313: 307: 306: 304: 287:the discussion 274: 273: 257: 245: 244: 242:Mid‑importance 236: 224: 223: 217: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2034: 2023: 2020: 2018: 2015: 2013: 2010: 2008: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1993: 1990: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1980: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1968: 1965: 1963: 1960: 1958: 1955: 1953: 1950: 1948: 1945: 1943: 1940: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1930: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1922: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1894: 1891: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1872: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1780: 1775: 1768: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1740: 1738: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1720: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1662:2.245.148.227 1655: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1534: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1460: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1446: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1403: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1394: 1391: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1370: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1350: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1329: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1302: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1241: 1236: 1232: 1231: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1166: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1040: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1002: 996: 992: 988: 985: 981: 978: 977: 976: 972: 968: 964: 959: 956: 955: 954: 952: 948: 944: 940: 931: 926: 925: 918: 916: 912: 908: 907:Pan-Germanism 905:We also need 902: 894: 891: 887: 886: 885: 884: 879: 878: 877: 869: 866: 862: 861: 860: 859: 854: 853: 852: 845: 837: 832: 829: 826: 821: 818: 815: 812: 808: 804: 802: 798: 794: 790: 783: 779: 778:Oleg Platonov 774: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 739: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 698:and in small 697: 693: 688: 685: 678: 671: 670:its talk page 666: 661: 657: 653: 652: 647: 640: 639: 632: 630: 626: 622: 618: 613: 611: 607: 602: 599: 595: 594: 578: 577: 567: 563: 562: 558: 557: 547: 543: 542: 538: 534: 528: 525: 524: 521: 504: 500: 496: 491: 487: 483: 482: 474: 473:Russia portal 463: 461: 458: 454: 453: 449: 442: 438: 433: 430: 427: 423: 410: 406: 400: 397: 396: 393: 376: 372: 371: 366: 363: 360: 356: 355: 351: 345: 342: 339: 335: 322: 318: 312: 309: 308: 305: 288: 284: 280: 279: 271: 265: 260: 258: 255: 251: 250: 246: 240: 237: 234: 230: 225: 221: 215: 207: 206: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1870: 1783: 1776: 1772: 1751: 1747: 1744: 1724: 1697: 1659: 1645: 1615: 1586:70.24.150.53 1577: 1556: 1547:75.84.199.44 1538: 1518: 1500: 1488:75.84.199.44 1479: 1464: 1450: 1407: 1388: 1354: 1328:continental 1327: 1313: 1297: 1264: 1148: 1145:Belarusians. 1143: 1142: 1113: 1092:— Preceding 1082: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1017: 1009: 1006: 962: 943:77.188.78.46 932: 928: 920: 903: 899: 874: 849: 831: 820: 814: 806: 787:— Preceding 785: 755:antisemitism 740: 689: 686: 682: 679:introduction 651:Euro-Slavism 649: 614: 603: 574: 554: 532: 499:project page 494: 479: 404: 368: 364: 316: 276: 220:WikiProjects 203: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1853:Yugoslavism 1756:88.66.67.29 1677:88.66.67.29 1603:88.66.67.29 1580:—Preceding 1541:—Preceding 1482:—Preceding 1424:—Preceding 1380:Pan-Slavism 1373:Pan-Slavism 1366:Pan-Slavism 1333:88.66.67.29 1280:88.66.67.29 1125:88.66.67.29 1025:88.66.67.29 1003:pan-slavism 967:88.66.67.29 937:—Preceding 911:Pan-Arabism 759:immigration 743:Crimean War 665:its history 660:Pan-Slavism 486:WikiProject 365:Pan-Slavism 210:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 25:Pan-Slavism 1921:Categories 1301:Nahabedere 1233:Of course 807:References 771:sentiments 690:Since the 654:page were 610:designated 380:Yugoslavia 375:Yugoslavia 344:Yugoslavia 1898:Politonno 1857:Politonno 1785:Politonno 1351:Dead link 1235:sarmatism 1011:Gringo300 987:Politonno 712:autocracy 623:, or any 208:is rated 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1779:this map 1752:Slovakia 1748:Serbian 1582:unsigned 1543:unsigned 1484:unsigned 1468:Delirium 1426:unsigned 1396:contribs 1240:Voyevoda 1094:unsigned 984:germanic 939:unsigned 789:unsigned 700:European 292:Politics 283:politics 239:Politics 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1708:Krakkos 1633:Zazaban 1453:Dojarca 1318:Evlekis 736:fascism 732:slavish 535:on the 437:History 407:on the 319:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1889:value. 1871:ethnic 1656:Venice 1561:Molobo 1522:Szopen 1507:Szopen 1393:(talk) 1202:Ghirla 1169:Ghirla 980:german 728:Russia 720:Russia 696:Russia 656:merged 508:Russia 490:Russia 432:Russia 216:scale. 126:Google 1845:Sorbs 1411:Árpád 1314:Slavs 1077:hold? 658:into 197:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1902:talk 1880:talk 1876:Vipz 1861:talk 1847:and 1821:, a 1805:talk 1801:Vipz 1789:talk 1760:talk 1732:talk 1712:talk 1681:talk 1666:talk 1637:talk 1622:talk 1607:talk 1590:talk 1578:-G 1565:talk 1551:talk 1526:talk 1511:talk 1503:here 1492:talk 1472:talk 1434:talk 1390:maru 1337:talk 1284:talk 1129:talk 1102:talk 1029:talk 991:talk 971:talk 947:talk 797:talk 763:USSR 714:and 604:The 527:High 484:, a 399:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1378:In 1371:In 1364:In 963:not 924:JHK 738:. 311:Mid 176:TWL 1923:: 1904:) 1882:) 1863:) 1807:) 1791:) 1762:) 1734:) 1714:) 1683:) 1668:) 1639:) 1624:) 1609:) 1592:) 1567:) 1559:-- 1528:) 1513:) 1494:) 1474:) 1436:) 1339:) 1286:) 1214:-- 1131:) 1104:) 1031:) 993:) 982:≠ 973:) 949:) 909:, 799:) 773:. 706:. 439:/ 435:: 156:) 54:; 1900:( 1878:( 1859:( 1803:( 1787:( 1758:( 1730:( 1710:( 1679:( 1664:( 1635:( 1620:( 1605:( 1588:( 1563:( 1549:( 1524:( 1509:( 1490:( 1470:( 1432:( 1335:( 1282:( 1127:( 1100:( 1027:( 989:( 969:( 945:( 795:( 672:. 579:. 559:. 539:. 505:. 411:. 323:. 222:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index