User talk:Dekimasu - Knowledge (XXG)

515:). I will not reinstate the material that was reverted; the evidence shows that this would encourage you to continue evading your block, and there are other issues with what was changed, such as (but not limited to) repeated insertion of personal judgments (e.g. "mercilessly") that are not supported by the evidence. One underlying point is that it is disruptive—a drain on the time and resources of a significant number of editors in good standing—to try to go through each example of your block evasion to attempt to determine what is useful and what is not, when it is already known that there is a pattern of problems. A second underlying point is that you should not be trying to insert material while blocked, or negotiate the reinsertion of material while blocked. While I was not the first person to block you either here or on other Wikimedia sites, I encourage you to reflect on the pattern of blocks that you have faced to date. Not all editors are blocked for disruption, so you should make an attempt to consider why your editing has resulted in blocks. And not all editors who are blocked attempt to circumvent the blocks through evasion. Currently, to editors and administrators attempting to improve articles here, your evasion is an indication that you are not interested in adhering to the behavioral norms of the project or acknowledging consensus. If you would like this sort of thing to be reconsidered at some point in the future, the proper course of action is to not continue the same pattern that resulted in your blocks. That, of course, would also mean not evading your block. Best, 945:

look kindly on adding content to one’s own Knowledge (XXG) page when I added some content to my page on March 5th. Knowledge (XXG) notified me of this and, as a result, I first apologized in a message to Knowledge (XXG) and then I immediately removed (almost) all of the content I had added to my page on March 7th. I read what you have said and, as I said before, although I’m disappointed that the existence of my two textbooks is no longer mentioned at all in the article (especially since there are a number of references that clearly prove that at least English language versions of both books exist), all that you’ve done is acceptable to me. Once again, I’m very sorry for any trouble I might have caused and, in the future, please be assured that I certainly won’t be making any additions or modifications to my Knowledge (XXG) page! Dekimasu – thank you so much for your understanding. Sincerely, Paul Richman

2036:

that Knowledge (XXG) sets for this concept will set global standards in government, policy, medicine, and more. I am not advocating that such advocacy happen, but it is just a consequence of Knowledge (XXG)'s dominance as a global reference source. You have made no error by Knowledge (XXG)'s rules, but Knowledge (XXG)'s typical rule set should not lead to making such major sweeping changes on-wiki and beyond in such a rush. Thanks for enforcing the rules, which is what keeps Knowledge (XXG) stable and is what is supposed to happen. You have done everything you are supposed to do and I sincerely appreciate the order that you bring.

1977:

linked the move review (which is not intended to determine either of those questions). I do not think editors moving from that post to the move review would do so without prejudice, and it is foreseeable that they would comment on the content of the discussion rather than on the close. You again mention here using the RfC process, and I again suggest that moves should be discussed through the RM process. Nominations in the RM process do not need to be neutral, so it is possible you might be more comfortable with that in future discussions as well.

400:

title, whereas the general's page includes (general).In an effort to maintain a better standard of names and enhance visibility for General Zaw Min Tun, who is currently more relevant than the footballer, I am interested in proposing a move from "Zaw Min Tun (general)" to simply "Zaw Min Tun."Could you kindly guide me on the appropriate steps to initiate this process? Your assistance is highly appreciated. If this adjustment is not feasible or requires further consideration, I completely understand.Thank you for your time and support.

1807:

leads me to believe it represented an unrepresentative cross-section of the editorship or a local consensus. Whether the outcome of the move of the article should apply to particular other parts of the encyclopedia as a result of further discussion is something that again can be determined by the community. Since I find the outcome of the discussion clear, I do not intend to reopen it at this time. Of course you are free to question this at

1373:, I went and replaced the fictional references from 4 articles that were moved to draftspace (the other 2 seems to have been deleted under G5, making it impossible for me to attempt the same thing, wouldn't have been notable anyways), and also fixed some horrible translations and excessive use of bold markups. However, as my English skill is limited, I am not quite sure if this was enough cleaning to get the unverifiable informations off. 908:

page on March 5th. Knowledge (XXG) notified me of this and, as a result, I first apologized in a message to Knowledge (XXG) and then COMPLETELY REMOVED THE CONTENT I HAD ADDED from my page on March 7th, reverting the page back to the way if was beforehand. As a result, my Knowledge (XXG) page is now back to the way it was in February of this year. I hope this action on my part alleviates your concern. Thanks!

1844:) that a whole load of sub pages and categories change, and I can't quite see why that was never discussed. It is a kind of hidden, policy-driven outcome that cannot be undone, and without grounds to overturn the move it must proceed, seemingly. Maybe that's as it should be, I don't know, I just think wider participation in changes of that scale are needed, and maybe there should be guidance in 31: 1942:

that Knowledge (XXG)'s deadline cannot be changed by a few days and since I missed the comment period, now this article has to change, and so do thousands of others. I missed the notice of the move discussion but I sure did not miss the notice that 50,000 other articles were now going to change. That move was not advertised anywhere near to the extent of its effects.

267: 41: 36: 26: 21: 1967:

Thank you for contacting me, both here and by e-mail. I appreciate it. Unfortunately your availabilities are very difficult due to my current time zone. If it turns out to be necessary I can try to arrange something next week, but I usually handle everything on-wiki. Regarding the opening of the move

1634:

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. This was my error, and everything is back where it should be now. Separately, all of the existing articles on the individual books in the series appear to consist solely of plot summaries (there are actually four, and the others redirect to the series because

944:

Dear Dekimasu - Thank you very much for your detailed explanation as to what happened, which I completely understand and I am very willing to accept. As I had previously indicated to Knowledge (XXG) in the TALK section associated with my article, I was unaware that Knowledge (XXG)'s policies did not

1988:

or elsewhere, particularly if there are policy- or guideline-based reasons for changing some aspect of the result. However, I would suggest that instead of focusing on the previous move request, that discussion should be forward-looking. I don't want to mischaracterize your comment that consensus is

1976:

I recognize that you mean well. As far as potential misconduct is concerned, I didn't find the talk page post I linked to be neutral, because it suggested that Knowledge (XXG)'s role here is to "set global standards" (requesting advocacy), offered your opinion ("I question whether 'queer' is "), and

1882:

says that "consensus is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Knowledge (XXG) policy." The reflection of overall policy and guidelines, rather than the number of editors involved, is what helps us determine consensus. If the

907:

My Knowledge (XXG) page received the following notice today: "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject." I was unaware that Knowledge (XXG)'s policies did not look kindly on adding content to his own Knowledge (XXG) page when I added some content to my

641:

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. It looks like the redirect predates the article, which explains why it doesn't point to the right place now. I mostly agree that the magazine should be at the title with the macron, but those sorts of moves are not always uncontroversial. (The question tends

2066:

ongoing consensus (you even noted that maybe this should just be put in an FAQ as it was so commonly known to editors involved in the space that for now the data didn't support the move (yet), until it did), so I don't know why it came as a surprise now that eventually the mainstream sentiment data

2058:

Just as I and several other active editors of the LGBTQ space have noted in the Move Review - this discussion of the move (and the likely follow up of subtopic articles) has been ongoing for years and most editors active on the Wikiproject or any of the sub articles have been aware for as long that

2035:

The part about your action to which I object is you following rules designed for moving a single page when the actual situation is that the stakes are many thousands of articles, and also major global influence beyond Knowledge (XXG) into the media ecosystem. Regardless of anyone's intent, the name

1925:

You said that I did inappropriate canvassing. When I am accused of misconduct, I typically make an offer to talk by voice and video. I sent you a link to my scheduler; I want to meet with you, and you can accept or decline as you like, but I make myself available. I am doing this because misconduct

1862:

The most basic mechanism to challenge the result of a previous move discussion is to start a new move discussion that reaches consensus for reversing the move (usually by arguing that a competing policy or guideline interest should take precedence). In a much more complex way it is also possible to

1690:

for the phrase "King's Cup", then you can also propose that those pages be moved to titles that end with "(Thailand)". However, you should not request moves for any articles in cases in which the actual name for the tournament used at the time was "King Cup". The main problem with the way moves are

1250:

Thanks, I have cleaned up the changes made by the newer sock (which, as I'm sure you noticed, also included unmarked machine translations and using sources that did not corroborate article/draft contents). I am not convinced that all of the Exam26 edits have been cleaned up consistently yet; that's

2031:

I do not expect you to watch me for 10+ minutes but regardless, I posted my comments on the talk page of the moved article. I do not like the high-stakes bureaucratic process that makes so many changes with so little flexibility after an arbitrary deadline. I appreciate that you suggest that I can

1941:

LGBTQ move. Consensus is supposed to be a lasting concept and I wanted to be heard, not overturn the move. If the move were legitimate then it should have been able to pass with a few additional comments from more people. In the move review and elsewhere I have people hovering around me telling me

1921:

Hey, here I am. I apologize for not following the move review instructions. Briefly, I did tag you and this talk page discussion when I filed it, and I thought that was sufficient. I see now that I should have tagged you on the talk page. Also, I saw the rule that the move had to be discussed, but

1573:

around right now and I am not sure whether this indicates that the editor now recognizes that, e.g., "Cheer up! English" is unreliable. Of course, the entire subject area tends to be problematic. From my perspective there are not too many issues with writing about characters in these works if they

1194:

Dekimasu, since you blocked Wildlover22 indefinitely, even the sockpuppetry twice, I think it is time for Wildlover22 to retire. Once the Wildlover22 is retiring, you'll never have to be sockpuppetry on the other user pages that belonged to Wildlover22's. Hope you like the my idea. Obrigado (Thank

463:

I am terribly sorry I removed your additional comment when I added a few things to the Afd about Choshu. I saw there was an edit conflict and tried to resolve it manually but I didn't check neither the preview nor the result. My sincere apologies. Thanks again for noting and fixing it. Very sorry.

215:

That was nothing but frustration. It happens sometimes! You can't expect a person (like I am for example) to repeatedly teach some IPs about editing Knowledge (XXG) or how it's done! Although I can assure you that I'll be more careful with my words! Can't guarantee it but of course I'll better try

119:, you pinged me with a direct question last week, so I am following your talk page. Please be aware that issuing threats and retaliating against editors who disagree with you is actionable. Leaving a comment instead of making a decision on the matter myself was meant to be the gentler option here. 1840:

consensus, and since a move review only checks whether the close was a proper reflection of consensus there's no actual mechanism to challenge that. So it isn't necessarily that I disagree with the conclusion you reached, it is that, once a top level page is renamed, there are policy reasons (eg.

1839:

Just to expand on this, this is the second time I have encountered a page move with significant, undiscussed implications that didn't come to light until after the fact, and I'm genuinely unsure how these should be dealt with. I don't think you could have closed it any other way, there was clear

1806:

Thank you for your message. I do not believe that the consensus of the discussion was in question, that the neutrally worded WikiProject notification was inappropriate, or that the number of articles affected should prevent the community from renaming articles. I see little in the discussion that

2160:

I think others can take care of this. By the way, it's always possible to have a discussion arguing that the page should be a redirect, or to boldly replace all of the material with a redirect template, or to revert conversion of a redirect to an article and then engage in discussion, but please

399:

Hello, Dekimasu. I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to reach out with a quick inquiry regarding the Knowledge (XXG) page for Zaw Min Tun (general). I have noticed that there is another individual named Zaw Min Tun, a footballer, who does not use the (footballer) designation in his page

289:

All editors are expected to uphold Knowledge (XXG)'s policies regarding user conduct consistently, including when dealing with IPs. You've said that you will be more careful with your words, so hopefully this is an isolated incident; please be sure that you are also not retaliating against other

2161:

don't put a redirect template at the top of an article and leave all the contents of the article below it. Further, the similar format of both of these messages (before I edited them into wikilink form) leads me to wonder whether there is any logged-out editing going on. If there is, please see

1972:

notification. I was pinged to the discussion by another editor within a few hours, but would have liked to hear from you as well, since opening a move review also implies misconduct: the move review is to determine whether my close "was inconsistent with the spirit and intent of Knowledge (XXG)

1871:). At the same time, when the consensus of a previous discussion is clear, it may just slow things down to have the same result litigated over and over at each subsequent discussion. Ideally editors working with consensus in mind will be able to find a productive balance between those two poles. 574:

Since you have started to reinstate block-evading edits on other pages, I have blocked the IP you were using to write here. If you have other comments related to your block, I encourage you to log in and write them on the talk page of the account that is currently marked as the sockmaster—e.g.

1342:

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please

660:

Thank you. I don't think I've made a requested move yet but will try to read the documentation and do it at some point, it seems similar to deletion discussions. So far my Knowledge (XXG) involvement has mostly involved writing articles, editing, and participating in deletion discussions.

1154:

and shows no disruption since protecting them back 4 years ago. I am wondering if this may be an idea to remove protection from both those pages as the subjects are not globally popular and disruption was fairly rare except for 2019 and January 2020 when you protected them indefinitely.

415:

There is no problem with the way the discussion is arranged, but the discussion needs to proceed for one week, and the page must not be moved while the discussion is open. Please leave things the way they are, although you should feel free to respond with additional comments. Note that

1319: 1618:

book series all have pages, but now the first one's missing and now everybody is gonna confuse that this name which was used in the book was also used for the anime (albeit for international releases). If there's any problem or solution, please let me know to figure this out, thanks!

1434:

I only made a few edits to that article at the time it was a current event, but generally speaking, it is routine for everyone to condemn such a thing. While international impact is important to cover in articles, I doubt that many individual reactions are necessary to include. Best,

344:

states "Do not ask for a specific closer under any circumstances." When a move request has run its course, someone uninvolved will eventually close it. Specific editors should not be messaged for a close; if there is something particularly pressing involved, you can make a post at

1574:

are treated as fictional or legendary, but when it is recognized that we have no reliable sources then the issue of notability arises. At that point perhaps there isn't much difference between how we treat these figures and minor biblical ones; a single article along the lines of

1902:

was significantly closer to inappropriate canvassing than anything that took place during the move discussion. This is not one of my primary editing areas, so if it happens that you notice any RfCs initiated in the future, assistance ensuring that they are worded neutrally per

603:

Hello Dekimasu-san, Thank you for everything you do to improve Knowledge (XXG) particularly with providing Japanese sources in deletion discussions. I wanted to ask you a question about changing the page a link redirects to and moving pages around. I noticed that you linked to

304:

It's not like I haven't been slept for the ages! And I have took frequent breaks, sometimes for a day, but things never changed, they always remained the same! Anyway we should leave this topic. I asked you a question three paragraphs above (What message have I received?).

1127:? I made an edit to discuss more of the history of the island wrt Japan in addition to the displacement of the Ainus but was undone by an editor who seems to make a practice of adding info about China on Japan-related articles. I replied to a discussion in the talk page. 1639:). Those articles either need to be improved to show their notability or should be redirected back to the series page, which also doesn't do a great job of establishing notability. But for now this was my mistake as I had missed the switch from "tales" to "twins". Best, 2210:. This editor often raises Japan-related questions (and sometimes questions on European nobility, etc.) on the reference desks. This is one of many frequently used Italian IP ranges, and is one of the main reasons I'm currently monitoring the Humanities page. Best, 325:

The message is simply insistence that you not threaten or retaliate against other editors, even when frustrated. You do not need to reply again here. You've already said that you will do your best, and hopefully that means there will be no further problems.

555:

would probably result in a much shorter article than the current version. If there is an editor who is interested in improving the article, it will be improved. Note that this does not mean that you should contact editors to ask them to change the article.

967:

Dear Dekimasu, I've explained my reason in those pages' summary, then, please, can you read about those absolutely necessary corrections very well instead of delete them again? Maybe you can modify them if there is something wrong. Thank you very much.

750:. Changing the links creates a strain on the editing time of other editors, with no positive results, and in many cases the links you altered were also intentionally specific. As I explained in my edit summaries, continuing to do this is a form of 872:). I would also suggest focusing on the mainspace and talk errors rather than the archives, since some of the talk archive moves appear correct and it may be more difficult to explain that aspect of the problem succinctly (e.g. try explaining why 1883:

implications of the move are significant, then the question is whether it causes us to do things that are contrary to policy and guidelines. Here I don't think anything like that will take place if we pay attention to the distinctions drawn by

1322: 1863:

find consensus to change the guidelines or policies upon which the move discussion hinged (and this is definitely an appropriate conversation to have through an RfC). More generally, page moves are always organized under the rubric of

1541:

is an example of one of their articles in mainspace. I can't really make sense of the page history (maybe there are deleted revisions in there?). Hopefully you have the ability and inclination to get further with this than I did. --

1946:

LGBTQ move is completely settled and not to be discussed further. It may not be your intent that the decision not radiate out, but I do not think your intent matters because that is what is going to happen. I regret that outcome.

193:, "Enough explanation by me, now you'll pay". Threatening other editors is never acceptable under any circumstances, and going through the list of the IPs edits and undoing them when they have not been blocked can be regarded as 1993:. That happened here, and it can happen again in the future. Being heard does not only need to take place within the format of the move request that I closed. There were policy-based arguments related to article titling made at 642:

to be whether a standard title without the macron has already been established in English, even though the macronned form is more accurate.) I will point the redirect to the current location, and then a request can be made at

1867:: moves, including mass moves, should not be performed unilaterally when anyone is expected to "reasonably disagree with the move", so the outcome of a single move discussion cannot be used to run roughshod over objections ( 1018:

As before, block evasion and using sock accounts is not a route to instituting your preferred version of articles. Admitting that you are using a sock account does not mean that ignoring the existing block is acceptable.

1537:; in short, the editor has no idea what reliable sources are, and doesn't seem able to explain their research process. I don't think it's Immanuelle, but it certainly is someone who writes quite a bit like Immanuelle. 746:, please note that wikilinks should only be altered when they are not pointed to the correct locations. The edits you have been making are already pointing to the correct articles, so they should not be altered per 697:) that I would normally need to kick myself about, so it shows that it's worth involving more eyes in the conversation. But at the same time, we also got the redirect fixed. So good results all around! Best, 1388:

Thanks for your help with this. As you have probably seen, there has been some additional sockpuppetry involved, but I think we have cleaned up many of the problems that were created by this editing. Best,

1686:, including all of the articles that you think should be moved. You should propose titles that do not conflict with other titles, such as titles that end with "(Saudi Arabia)". If the Thai cup is not the 1081: 1048: 675:

Turns out I did a start a requested move before in an ill-fated attempt to get the article on WW2 incarceration moved to reflect the more accurate terminology. Anyway, I have made the request at

926:

It is not quite the case that your edits restored the page to the way it looked before your edits, although I acknowledge that may have been your intention; I have replied in further detail at

2098: 1663:

is a huge mistake that no social media outlet, let alone a huge encyclopedia, should be involved in spreading. What do you propose to clean up this long-running mess? I hope you get my point.

2102: 852:

and some but not all of the large number of talk archive moves), and there have been a few individual problematic repressions this year, mostly involving talk pages. The behavior falls under

551:. I am not sure what your goal has been in editing that article, but it does not serve readers to add unreliable or sensationalized information. Editing the article down to what is actually 828:, but I purposefully haven't named the editor in question yet as I wanted to check if you'd mind this sort of report on your talk page; or if you'd rather I went to AN/I or somewhere else. 95:

You seem to be very exited and interested in my editing domain don't you! Every single time in every controversy related to me, you always come outta nowhere! Very nice of you, keep it up!

1874:

I do fundamentally disagree that there was insufficient participation in the requested move discussion. Discussion and policy application must be scalable. (It is actually easier to avoid

511:

I know that you are aware you should not be editing when blocked, and that you should not be switching IPs or using other accounts to continue editing (on the English Knowledge (XXG),

161:

I have no hard feelings for anyone in the community but I do not like to repeatedly describe something again and again! I warned that IP in my edit summaries multiple times before (at

2032:

discuss the issue elsewhere, but in practice now that the move is settled, the counterargument that I am hearing is that the matter has already been settled at the LGBT/LGBTQ article.

1533:

Sorry to bother you about this, but it looks like we have another well-meaning but problematic editor working in this subject area. You can see my attempts to get anywhere at all at

1336: 2095:

Please can you do redirect without text or anything similar to stop this ip with multiple socks/blocks; (al madeena in logs). created after deletion, refused clearing or any help.

201:, because they are counterproductive. I am asking you not to threaten or hound the other editor, whether you feel your position is correct or not. Have you received that message? 1734:

At first glance it looks completely correct. Sometimes there are objections to disambiguation pages that have only two entries (personally I think they are fine, but we have

1586:. I will try to keep an eye on the behavioral side of this if I can. Asking you not to review drafts as a result of how you are actually checking sources is not encouraging. 1738:), and normally it would be good to see a short description after the entries on the disambiguation page, but this seems great. Let me know if you have any other questions! 821:

left by yourself in January 2020. Since then, they've had at least one other enquiry about their use of the permission, which - as far as I can see - wasn't responded to.

2123:. If you think a redirect is necessary despite the deletion of the article from mainspace, you may be able to discuss this with the administrator who protected the page, 1344: 2005:. I cannot say whether other participants in future discussions will be convinced that the global perspective argument is well founded or should take precedence over 1716: 1470:

I know there are at least three current admins on the English Knowledge (XXG) who claim to have near-native Japanese ability. The number is quite low, however.

290:

editors. If other editors are causing you too much frustration, please consider taking a break. I hope the sleep will help; you're right, it's late here too.

1929:

I have been doing LGBT+ activism for all my life. I mean well. I feel that the discussion on Knowledge (XXG) is narrow and includes little of the discourse.

856:#3, particularly because this is a pattern over an extended period, the editor is aware of the problem, and there has been a refusal to change to adhere to 1335:

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the

813:

Hi Dekimasu - I recently came across an editor with pagemover rights, who's been moving pages without redirects in situations where I believe none of the

1894:(I still haven't heard from the editor who opened the move review. I have tried not to make many comments at the move review, but I would also note that 869: 501:

Please, can you recontrol all info you've deleted (corrections, sources as requested, etc.) and maybe edit yourself those very important? Thank you. --

2067:

would be evolving from LGBT to LGBTQ and that then, such a move would be supported as that had been the editing community's stance for a long time.

817:

apply. I was going to leave them a message about it, but then I noticed that they've had a number of such messages over several years; including a

860:. It's unfortunate because the editor is otherwise productive. It would be easier for me to have others deal with this since I may not be able to 1945:

If there is to be some other action, like an RfC on moving everything, then I expect the common argument there will simply be that the LGBT-: -->

197:. I find it very troubling that you are doubling down on this. Note that I have not given you an "ultimatum"; we are not supposed to be giving 1275:

With your rollback you have deleted info and sources absolutely necessary. Please, can you restore them yourself, so it's definitely closed?

1997:

which resulted in a clear consensus. You also made a policy-based (but unsourced) comment related to systemic bias and global perspective at

1282: 991: 975: 1624: 138: 990:

please, can you left them so it's definitely closed? or in alternative, after the deletion, van you added them yourself in a correct way?

2105: 1575: 1164: 530: 502: 1370: 1085: 1052: 1409:

Hi!, I wanted to let you know that the prime minister of Iceland, Bjarni Benediktsson condemns the attack on Donald Trump yesterday,

1990: 626:

where you linked it. I don't know how to approach this given the existing article locations and redirects. Do you have any advise?

579:. However, please note that this suggestion does not mean you should attempt to negotiate article contents on that user talk page. 620:. It seems to me that that, at a minimum, the redirect should point to the magazine but ideally, the article should be located at 1063: 134: 1620: 1505:

I think you have already received feedback elsewhere, but if the article you are working on is an autobiography, please review

864:

if there are any objections to the removal, but I would be happy to reply as necessary if you initiate a discussion somewhere.

1582:, but for my part I don't know if it is possible to explain what separates the notability of biblical figures from those in 1174:

At the time the disruption was very... disruptive. I have tried unprotecting them for now, so let's see what happens. Best,

424:. Also, it is fine to write to me using your own words. If there is something I can't understand, I'll let you know. Best, 824:

I therefore wanted to seek the attention/advice of an admin on this matter. I'm messaging you as the admin that left the

346: 1414: 1683: 189:, other editors do not appear to regard the IP's edits as vandalism. However, what I was objecting to was specifically 1922:

since someone else already discussed it with you and you declined, then I thought that was sufficient for me to begin.

1579: 70: 1875: 1691:

being requested now is that they are being done one at a time and are requesting titles that remain ambiguous. Best,

576: 560:. Your reply does not indicate to me that you have understood my previous message; I encourage you to read it again. 1614:? Considering that TMS also uses that title for the anime's international releases. All of the other sequels in the 1297:

As before, block evasion and using sock accounts is not a route to instituting your preferred version of articles.

1687: 1506: 1004:

A last change to contribute in a very proper way, not vandalism and requests to other users. I'm now "Mario1945".

1969: 1932:

I am most upset that the closure you did is already being used as justification for ending the discussion, as in

1853: 1830: 1795: 1611: 1286: 611: 1668: 1495: 1378: 995: 979: 1808: 1980:

I have mentioned this a few times too, but there is no reason why subsequent discussion cannot take place at

2109: 1895: 1160: 534: 1904: 1787: 1278: 971: 194: 2119:

The page has been protected against recreation, and I have deleted the draft version of the article under

2044: 1955: 1460: 1424: 1200: 1783: 1664: 861: 835: 747: 198: 2151: 950: 927: 916: 162: 1735: 1569:

removed that source and linked to Aston (though marked "Anston") directly, but I do not have the Aston

1420: 1233: 1229: 870:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Requests for permissions#Where to file a request for removal of Page Mover rights?

557: 2147: 1799: 946: 912: 236:

Have I recieved that message! Not exactly (I guess)! I have no idea what massage you're referring to!

2062:

It appears you haven't participated in the last few years of the prior move discussions, but it does

1998: 1940:, my talking points are shut down based on the argument that everything was settled in the LGBT-: --> 1937: 1849: 1826: 1791: 1724: 1547: 1534: 1241: 732: 544: 465: 1968:

review, the section on my talk page was linked but I was not pinged, in addition to not receiving a

1779: 2225: 2203: 2193: 1764: 1491: 1374: 1009: 676: 443: 417: 405: 1879: 1841: 793:

Thanks for notifying me of the subsequent discussion, and I have replied on your talk page. Best,

2207: 1490:

can you check this topic please in my sandbox and can you help me to add sources in the article

1156: 1132: 684: 666: 631: 373: 315: 279: 246: 226: 175: 151: 105: 1251:

one of the things that made it easy for this sock to pick up where the Exam26 account left off.

1210:

Please note that continuing the same pattern of editing while logged out is not an improvement.

512: 2072: 2037: 1948: 1456: 1196: 1108: 621: 605: 2162: 2002: 1868: 1636: 853: 814: 341: 50:

Knowledge (XXG) from time to time. If you leave a message here, I will notice it eventually.

1356: 848:

I have not looked at this in a while, but it seems this was still happening last year (e.g.

2192:? I'm not familiar with this blocked user and would like to know the background. Thanks, -- 2120: 1864: 1510: 421: 186: 2143: 1720: 1558: 1543: 1350:

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

1237: 743: 728: 470: 2006: 1845: 865: 751: 643: 548: 1811:

if necessary, and I'm sorry to have reached a conclusion with which you disagree. Best,

1332:

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

1888: 1005: 615: 439: 401: 1926:

is personal and if you feel that way, then I offer to personally communicate with you.

1561:, I looked into this enough to see that external wikis were being used, and certainly 1410: 857: 552: 2211: 2166: 2130: 2010: 1908: 1812: 1739: 1692: 1640: 1587: 1514: 1471: 1436: 1415:

https://www.visir.is/g/20242596773d/bjarni-segir-at-burdi-gaer-kvoldsins-a-takan-lega

1390: 1298: 1252: 1225: 1211: 1175: 1128: 1124: 1067: 1020: 931: 885: 794: 783: 775: 755: 724: 698: 680: 662: 647: 627: 580: 561: 516: 482: 425: 364: 350: 327: 306: 291: 270: 237: 217: 202: 166: 142: 120: 116: 96: 165:) but I guess they were unable to see and listen! May be they're deaf or something! 2068: 1204: 884:

is easy to understand). If you have any other questions, please let me know. Best,

1763:, I want to draw attention to the fact that this has now triggered an attempt to 1104:

I have reopened the RM. Please help check whether everything is fine now. Thanks!

48:

I am always very busy, and I can't edit as often as I'd like. However, I do check

1884: 1147: 1878:

by working on the broader problem, or in this case the parent article, first.)

1994: 1985: 1981: 1933: 1899: 1760: 2009:, but in that discussion the participants disagreed rather than not hearing. 1767:

and all similarly named categories, affecting tens of thousands of articles.

1066:. To me, it does not appear that those standards are met at this time. Best, 1672: 1566: 1538: 1320:

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

1151: 930:, but I have not readded the conflict of interest tag to the article. Best, 610:

in the Shinohara Yoshiko deletion discussion. Oddly, that link redirects to

2125: 831:

Let me know what you think would be best in this situation. All the best.

30: 1562: 779: 543:

I do not fully understand what you mean by "recontrol", but for example,

55:

I try to accept criticism of my edits and responsibility for my comments,

15: 1712: 1628: 1610:(the book) just to make room (or replace it with) for the page for the 1606:

Is there any valid reason why did you remove or delete the article for

1062:

Subjects of biographical articles on Knowledge (XXG) must meet certain

727:

hey please stop reverting edits on directed Knowledge (XXG) pages okay

266: 2228: 2219: 2196: 2174: 2155: 2138: 2113: 2076: 2049: 2024: 2018: 1960: 1916: 1857: 1848:

that such policy outcomes should be explicitly identified in advance?

1834: 1820: 1790:. Could you reconsider the close and re-open with wider notification? 1747: 1728: 1700: 1648: 1595: 1551: 1522: 1499: 1479: 1464: 1444: 1428: 1398: 1382: 1359: 1306: 1290: 1260: 1245: 1219: 1183: 1168: 1136: 1112: 1089: 1075: 1056: 1028: 1013: 999: 983: 954: 939: 920: 893: 842: 802: 787: 774:

Hey, I just realized I left a message a bit out of context for you at

763: 736: 706: 688: 670: 655: 635: 588: 569: 538: 524: 505: 490: 475: 447: 433: 409: 378: 358: 335: 320: 299: 284: 251: 231: 210: 180: 156: 128: 110: 1578:

would probably be preferable to a lot of articles along the lines of

1123:

Understand if you are not interested, but penny for your thoughts at

69:

I have an archive of older topics from this page. It can be accessed

40: 35: 25: 20: 693:

I see that there was an improvement suggested in that discussion (

261: 1565:

is not a reliable source. It looks like the most recent edits to

1043:

Create this article please.... Born:January 5th 2018 TV program:

57:

and we should be able to resolve any editing disputes amicably.

2103:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Al Madeena Cherpulassery

1684:

Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves#Requesting multiple page moves

1146:

Hi, I have had a look at the page histories of two articles -

1989:

a lasting concept, but from another angle, we also know that

1455:

Didn't know there were Japanese admins here. Sugoi desu ka.

2099:

Special:Contributions/2409:40F3:1094:A201:5F1:A577:18D:9819

1715:, would you mind checking if everything was done correctly 778:. I'd appreciate it if you could have a look over there. -- 2189:

Hi, please could you clarify the reason for this deletion

2206:, the easiest answer with recent info is to point you to 264:, so you should also take a nap or something. Goodnight! 1778:, and none of the other projects that are affected (eg. 2190: 2063: 2026:

Talk:LGBTQ#Late_comments_for_the_rename_of_LGBT_-_: -->

1775: 1771: 1313:

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

881: 877: 873: 849: 646:

to adjust the title of the article if necessary. Best,

190: 60: 1039:

Knowledge (XXG) article creation request: Eric Filatov

876:

is inappropriate in a few sentences... in comparison,

1825:

Thank you for the thoughtful response, best wishes.

1228:, I think this sockpuppeteer may have returned. See 1150:(formerly at Matthew Lowton when you protected) and 1411:

https://x.com/Bjarni_Ben/status/1812446456885748051

1938:Talk:LGBTQ_community#Requested_move_27_August_2024 1339:to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. 1529:Source problems on articles about legendary Japan 2059:the move would happen when the data supports it. 1535:User talk:Asilvering#Draft:Homutsuwake no Mikoto 137:, and I am aware of what Knowledge (XXG) is and 2146:: Same request here, should be last related. 340:Regarding your edits today, please note that 8: 1405:Reactions from the prime minister of Iceland 395:Request for Guidance on Page Name Adjustment 1973:common practice, policies, or guidelines". 1276: 969: 260:It's time for me to sleep, It's 3:43AM in 1323:Please help translate to other languages. 1682:move request using the instructions at 1082:2001:44C8:4286:21D8:C94A:392E:B1E3:E94E 1049:2001:44C8:4286:21D8:C94A:392E:B1E3:E94E 481:No problem! Thanks for the note. Best, 61:express your opinion or ask for my help 825: 818: 809:Pagemover right - redirect suppression 1770:With that in mind, the fact that the 963:Moritake Kimura and Yamamoto Heikichi 529:Ok, but can you recontrol it anyway? 7: 1991:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus can change 1765:speedy rename category LGBT to LGBTQ 1353:On behalf of the UCoC project team, 363:Alright! Thanks for the suggestion! 1576:List of minor New Testament figures 1142:Requesting unprotection on 2 pages 1080:Need Knowledge (XXG) standard ISO 497:Sankebetsu brown bear incident (2) 14: 868:might be the place to start (see 754:that can result in blocks. Best, 1195:you in Português in Brazilian). 575:indicating a desire to take the 347:Knowledge (XXG):Closure requests 265: 39: 34: 29: 24: 19: 2208:User talk:Graham87#Inufan socks 2025:_LGBTQ" title="Talk:LGBTQ": --> 2229:12:39, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2220:12:28, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 2197:07:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 577:Knowledge (XXG):Standard offer 420:is not a standard title under 78: 1: 2175:06:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 2156:02:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2139:00:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 2114:17:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 2077:15:34, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 2064:appear you were aware of that 2050:13:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 2019:05:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC) 1961:12:39, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 1917:07:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC) 1907:would be appreciated.) Best, 1858:16:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 1678:My recommendation is to make 1507:Knowledge (XXG):Autobiography 1379:Talk/Report any mistakes here 764:06:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) 737:06:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC) 689:20:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC) 671:12:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC) 656:02:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC) 636:13:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC) 589:15:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 570:15:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 539:15:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 525:15:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 506:14:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC) 342:WP:RMCI#Conflicts of interest 216:not to do it. Happy editing! 491:16:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 476:15:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC) 448:15:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 434:15:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 410:10:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC) 191:this particular edit summary 68: 54: 47: 18: 1835:10:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1821:09:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1809:Knowledge (XXG):Move review 1801:09:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1748:02:57, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1729:01:41, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1701:03:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 1673:15:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 1649:20:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1635:they were eliminated under 1629:19:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 1596:02:22, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 1580:Elizabeth (biblical figure) 1552:23:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 1523:08:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 1509:. Otherwise, please review 1500:08:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 1480:08:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 1445:08:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 1399:08:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 1369:Hello, from the discussion 1125:Talk:Hokkaido#NPOV language 1047:(2023) birthplace Bangkok 911:Sincerely, Paul Richman 379:05:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC) 359:04:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC) 336:04:53, 3 January 2024 (UTC) 321:03:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC) 300:18:47, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 285:18:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 252:18:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 232:18:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 211:18:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 181:18:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 157:18:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 139:what Knowledge (XXG) is not 129:18:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 111:18:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC) 2247: 1621:VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 1205:18:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC) 1189: 1184:07:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC) 1169:20:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC) 1137:20:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 1113:07:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC) 1029:14:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC) 1014:11:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 1000:07:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC) 984:21:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC) 955:17:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 940:04:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC) 1970:Template:Move review note 1465:13:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC) 1429:13:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC) 1261:11:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC) 1246:13:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC) 1090:15:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 1076:09:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 1057:09:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC) 921:18:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC) 894:05:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 843:04:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 803:04:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 788:13:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC) 707:04:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 612:Weekly magazines in Japan 1608:The Twins at St. Clare's 1383:12:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC) 1337:voting page on Meta-wiki 1190:Wildlover22's retirement 1098:Requested move reopening 1064:standards for notability 599:Changing redirect target 1360:23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) 1307:07:38, 2 May 2024 (UTC) 1291:07:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC) 1220:09:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC) 862:respond in a timely way 776:User talk:Joy#Bludgeon? 1711:Hello, in response to 1655:King Cup or King's Cup 1345:review the U4C Charter 928:User talk:Richmanpaul 163:Chiangrai United F.C. 2023:I posted a video at 1999:Talk:LGBTQ community 558:There is no deadline 2001:, which is part of 1891:in the move review. 1654: 677:Talk:Shukan Shincho 418:General Zaw Min Tun 368:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 310:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 274:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 241:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 221:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 170:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 146:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 100:– 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 91:Keeping an eye out! 1230:Draft:Yagyū Domain 900:Removal of Content 752:disruptive editing 2218: 2173: 2137: 2017: 1915: 1876:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS 1819: 1800:_LGBTQ_move": --> 1761:this move closure 1746: 1699: 1647: 1594: 1521: 1478: 1443: 1397: 1329:Dear Wikimedian, 1305: 1293: 1281:comment added by 1259: 1234:Draft:Katō (clan) 1218: 1182: 1102:Hi dearest admin, 1074: 1045:Japanese Let's Go 1027: 986: 974:comment added by 938: 892: 850:here in mainspace 801: 762: 705: 654: 587: 568: 523: 489: 432: 357: 334: 298: 209: 133:I did follow the 127: 85: 84: 77: 76: 2238: 2214: 2169: 2133: 2128: 2126:NinjaRobotPirate 2047: 2042: 2013: 1958: 1953: 1911: 1815: 1786:) strikes me as 1776:only one project 1742: 1695: 1680:one and only one 1643: 1590: 1517: 1474: 1439: 1393: 1301: 1255: 1236:as examples. -- 1214: 1178: 1115: 1111: 1070: 1023: 934: 904:Dear Dekimatsu, 888: 838: 834: 797: 758: 701: 650: 583: 564: 519: 485: 473: 468: 460:Hello Dekimasu, 428: 376: 371: 353: 330: 318: 313: 294: 282: 277: 269: 249: 244: 229: 224: 205: 178: 173: 154: 149: 123: 108: 103: 79: 43: 38: 33: 28: 23: 16: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2187: 2144:Sevens Football 2124: 2093: 2045: 2038: 1956: 1949: 1850:Void if removed 1827:Void if removed 1792:Void if removed 1757: 1709: 1657: 1604: 1601: 1531: 1488: 1453: 1407: 1367: 1315: 1283:193.207.198.133 1273: 1271:Moritake Kimura 1192: 1144: 1121: 1107: 1105: 1100: 1041: 992:193.207.106.153 976:193.207.101.101 965: 902: 841: 836: 832: 811: 772: 721: 601: 549:reliable source 499: 471: 466: 458: 397: 374: 365: 316: 307: 280: 271: 247: 238: 227: 218: 176: 167: 152: 143: 106: 97: 93: 12: 11: 5: 2244: 2242: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2226:Viennese Waltz 2224:OK, thanks. -- 2204:Viennese Waltz 2194:Viennese Waltz 2186: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2060: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2033: 2029: 1978: 1974: 1943: 1930: 1927: 1923: 1892: 1872: 1837: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1708: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1665:EpicAdventurer 1656: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1603: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1492:Ilovestreaming 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1366: 1363: 1327: 1326: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1143: 1140: 1120: 1117: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 964: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 901: 898: 897: 896: 840: 837:a smart kitten 810: 807: 806: 805: 771: 768: 767: 766: 720: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 695:Shūkan Shinchō 623:Shukan Shinchō 617:Shukan Shincho 607:Shukan Shinchō 600: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 572: 498: 495: 494: 493: 457: 454: 453: 452: 451: 450: 438:Okay. Thanks! 396: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 338: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 234: 159: 135:gentler option 92: 89: 87: 83: 82: 75: 74: 66: 65: 64: 58: 56: 52: 51: 49: 45: 44: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2243: 2230: 2227: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2195: 2191: 2185:Blocked user? 2184: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2122: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2106:93.140.190.14 2104: 2100: 2096: 2090: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2051: 2048: 2043: 2041: 2040:Bluerasberry 2034: 2030: 2028: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1959: 1954: 1952: 1951:Bluerasberry 1944: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1905:WP:RFCNEUTRAL 1901: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1870: 1866: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788:WP:CANVASSING 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1766: 1762: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1689: 1688:primary topic 1685: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1540: 1536: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1419:Thank you :) 1417: 1416: 1412: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1364: 1362: 1361: 1358: 1354: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1340: 1338: 1333: 1330: 1325: 1324: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1270: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1153: 1149: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1118: 1116: 1114: 1110: 1109:Safari Scribe 1097: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1038: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 1002: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 988: 987: 985: 981: 977: 973: 962: 956: 952: 948: 943: 942: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 924: 923: 922: 918: 914: 909: 905: 899: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 858:WP:R#SUPPRESS 855: 851: 847: 846: 845: 844: 839: 829: 827: 826:final warning 822: 820: 819:final warning 816: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 791: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 740: 739: 738: 734: 730: 726: 718: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 691: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 659: 658: 657: 653: 649: 645: 640: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624: 619: 618: 613: 609: 608: 598: 590: 586: 582: 578: 573: 571: 567: 563: 559: 554: 550: 546: 542: 541: 540: 536: 532: 531:80.116.115.57 528: 527: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 509: 508: 507: 504: 503:80.116.115.57 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 474: 469: 461: 455: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 414: 413: 412: 411: 407: 403: 394: 380: 377: 372: 370: 369: 362: 361: 360: 356: 352: 348: 343: 339: 337: 333: 329: 324: 323: 322: 319: 314: 312: 311: 303: 302: 301: 297: 293: 288: 287: 286: 283: 278: 276: 275: 268: 263: 259: 253: 250: 245: 243: 242: 235: 233: 230: 225: 223: 222: 214: 213: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 183: 182: 179: 174: 172: 171: 164: 160: 158: 155: 150: 148: 147: 140: 136: 132: 131: 130: 126: 122: 118: 115: 114: 113: 112: 109: 104: 102: 101: 90: 88: 81: 80: 72: 67: 62: 59:Feel free to 53: 46: 42: 37: 32: 27: 22: 17: 2215: 2188: 2170: 2134: 2097: 2094: 2039: 2014: 1950: 1912: 1816: 1784:WP:BIOGRAPHY 1769: 1758: 1743: 1713:this comment 1710: 1696: 1679: 1660: 1658: 1644: 1615: 1607: 1605: 1591: 1583: 1570: 1532: 1518: 1489: 1475: 1457:Rolando 1208 1454: 1440: 1421:Yonghwoarang 1418: 1408: 1394: 1368: 1357:RamzyM (WMF) 1355: 1352: 1349: 1341: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1318: 1302: 1277:— Preceding 1274: 1256: 1215: 1197:Robotlover26 1193: 1179: 1145: 1122: 1101: 1071: 1044: 1042: 1024: 970:— Preceding 966: 935: 910: 906: 903: 889: 830: 823: 812: 798: 773: 759: 748:WP:NOTBROKEN 722: 719:Any a favor? 702: 694: 651: 622: 616: 606: 602: 584: 565: 520: 500: 486: 472:(Mushy Yank) 462: 459: 429: 398: 367: 366: 354: 331: 309: 308: 295: 273: 272: 240: 239: 220: 219: 206: 185:As noted at 169: 168: 145: 144: 124: 99: 98: 94: 86: 2148:Cenderabird 1898:he made to 1754:LGBT -: --> 1736:WP:ONEOTHER 1616:St. Clare's 1602:St. Clare's 1148:Matt Lowton 947:Richmanpaul 913:Richmanpaul 614:instead of 467:My, oh my! 1995:Talk:LGBTQ 1986:Talk:Queer 1982:Talk:LGBTQ 1934:Talk:Queer 1900:Talk:Queer 1780:WP:HISTORY 1759:Regarding 1755:LGBTQ move 1721:RodRabelo7 1719:? Thanks, 1559:asilvering 1544:asilvering 1238:asilvering 744:Lovemuhcko 729:Lovemuhcko 553:verifiable 199:ultimatums 195:harassment 2121:WP:CSD#G5 1896:this edit 1880:WP:DETCON 1842:WP:CONSUB 1774:notified 1567:Saho-hime 1563:this site 1539:Saho-hime 1451:Konichiwa 1152:Jack Cork 1006:Mario1945 547:is not a 440:KhantWiki 402:KhantWiki 2212:Dekimasu 2167:Dekimasu 2131:Dekimasu 2011:Dekimasu 1909:Dekimasu 1813:Dekimasu 1740:Dekimasu 1693:Dekimasu 1661:King Cup 1659:Hi. The 1641:Dekimasu 1588:Dekimasu 1515:Dekimasu 1513:. Best, 1472:Dekimasu 1437:Dekimasu 1391:Dekimasu 1299:Dekimasu 1279:unsigned 1253:Dekimasu 1226:Dekimasu 1212:Dekimasu 1176:Dekimasu 1165:Contribs 1129:DCsansei 1119:Hokkaido 1068:Dekimasu 1021:Dekimasu 972:unsigned 932:Dekimasu 886:Dekimasu 795:Dekimasu 756:Dekimasu 725:Dekimasu 699:Dekimasu 681:DCsansei 663:DCsansei 648:Dekimasu 628:DCsansei 581:Dekimasu 562:Dekimasu 517:Dekimasu 513:WP:EVADE 483:Dekimasu 426:Dekimasu 351:Dekimasu 328:Dekimasu 292:Dekimasu 203:Dekimasu 121:Dekimasu 117:Akshadev 2163:WP:EWLO 2069:Raladic 2003:WP:NPOV 1869:WP:RMUM 1637:WP:BLAR 1584:Nihongi 1571:Nihongi 854:WP:PMRR 815:WP:PMRC 770:Maus RM 464:Best, - 456:Blunder 2046:(talk) 2027:_LGBTQ 1957:(talk) 1885:Tamzin 1865:WP:BRD 1772:opener 1511:WP:BIO 1365:Notice 742:Hello 422:WP:NCP 187:WP:AIV 2007:WP:AT 1846:WP:RM 1612:anime 866:WP:AN 644:WP:RM 262:Japan 2152:talk 2110:talk 2091:Note 2073:talk 1936:and 1887:and 1854:talk 1831:talk 1796:talk 1782:and 1725:talk 1717:here 1669:talk 1625:talk 1548:talk 1496:talk 1461:talk 1425:talk 1371:here 1287:talk 1242:talk 1232:and 1201:talk 1161:Swan 1157:Iggy 1133:talk 1086:talk 1053:talk 1010:talk 996:talk 980:talk 951:talk 917:talk 882:this 878:this 874:this 784:talk 733:talk 723:Hi @ 685:talk 667:talk 632:talk 545:this 535:talk 444:talk 406:talk 71:here 2202:Hi 1984:or 1889:F4U 1557:Hi 1375:ABG 1163:) ( 880:or 833:‍—‍ 780:Joy 2216:よ! 2171:よ! 2165:. 2154:) 2135:よ! 2129:. 2112:) 2101:, 2075:) 2015:よ! 1913:よ! 1856:) 1833:) 1817:よ! 1798:) 1744:よ! 1727:) 1707:RM 1697:よ! 1671:) 1645:よ! 1627:) 1592:よ! 1550:) 1519:よ! 1498:) 1486:Hi 1476:よ! 1463:) 1441:よ! 1427:) 1413:, 1395:よ! 1381:) 1347:. 1303:よ! 1289:) 1257:よ! 1244:) 1216:よ! 1203:) 1180:よ! 1167:) 1135:) 1106:— 1088:) 1072:よ! 1055:) 1025:よ! 1012:) 998:) 982:) 953:) 936:よ! 919:) 890:よ! 799:よ! 786:) 760:よ! 735:) 703:よ! 687:) 679:. 669:) 652:よ! 634:) 585:よ! 566:よ! 537:) 521:よ! 487:よ! 446:) 430:よ! 408:) 375:🗿 355:よ! 349:. 332:よ! 317:🗿 296:よ! 281:🗿 248:🗿 228:🗿 207:よ! 177:🗿 153:🗿 141:! 125:よ! 107:🗿 73:. 2150:( 2108:( 2071:( 1852:( 1829:( 1794:( 1723:( 1667:( 1623:( 1546:( 1494:( 1459:( 1423:( 1377:( 1285:( 1240:( 1224:@ 1199:( 1159:( 1131:( 1084:( 1051:( 1008:( 994:( 978:( 949:( 915:( 782:( 731:( 683:( 665:( 630:( 533:( 442:( 404:( 63:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index