Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 64

4323:, specifically the part about two-thirds of the way down the page, where the subject of his sexual identity comes up: "This is a touchy subject, 'cause I don't want to put out the queer flag; I don't know if I define myself as bisexual or queer, because I don't like labels." I'm torn, however, between whether this supports identifying him as LGBTQ and just avoiding pinning him down to a more specific label, or whether it's still too ambiguous to support LGBTQ-related categorization at all — is he saying he's in the LGBTQ family and just doesn't identify with a specific identity label within that, or is he saying he still doesn't know if he's in the LGBTQ family at all? So I wanted to ask for some other opinions either way. Thanks. 398:

instance, reasonable people may disagree on the exact definition of "openly gay"; there are shades of gray. Also, the titles of equivalent jobs vary from institution to institution, and not every business school is led by a dean, so that's another point where determining "the first" is not necessarily so easy. Saying he's "one of the first" sidesteps those issues, but it also seems fairly meaningless. How many openly gay business school deans do there have to be before it can no longer reasonably be claimed that one of them is among the first? That's the way it strikes me, but I could be wrong.

3454:

determined). Google results often don't mean a lot, but compare "LGBT+ community" to "LGBT community": the latter has more than 16 times as many hits, which is way more than can be accounted for by any search-specific anomaly I can think of. Having recently participated in a seemingly never-ending discussion about a different title, I'm well persuaded at this point that satisfying everyone shouldn't even be attempted. Pick a title that reflects common usage, make sure it's not misleading in any significant way, and stick with it. I think that's what we've got now. While the four letters of

4707:, my impression is that it fails to be sufficiently respectful for the preferences of the subject. There is no clear reason why a dead name needs to be highlighted in the first few words of the lead paragraph in bold text, especially if the subject is better known in terms of notability, under their current identity. For trans, genderqueer and others, I would much rather see the guidelines refined to put respect first and without compromising the encyclopaedic value of the article, have dead names not highlighted in bold, or deemphasised by being placed later in the lead. 751:, but as we build out wiki, I think that these kinds of concepts should have a top level article to accept any content. When the article gets bulky then we split it out to subarticles. If someone wanted to post about some law or cultural aspect of science or LGBT+ in a country, then having a top-level article makes for welcoming infrastructure. It is not a priority to me to empty poorly formed top level articles when at least they serve as a home for some content and a landing point for anyone to check for more specific subarticles. 2066:(down low on it) list the contributors to that article, in order of number of contributions. Each of the contributors has a "user talk" page (you can see that linked to on the first of those pages; after their name, you'll see "talk|contrib"; click on "talk") where you can leave messages just for them... but also when you go to their talk page, you will see on the left-hand column a link for "email this user", which is another way to reach directly out to them (and particularly useful if they are no longer active on Knowledge.) -- 2481:

likely to have a particular public relevance. When I worked as a busboy one summer in my teens, I'm pretty sure my LGBT status had no bearing on anything to do with my work; it may have been a defining characteristic of me, but it was not a defining characteristic of the intersection between me and my occupation. Honestly, I don't think the situation was much different when I was in a professional-level job a few years later. It's more likely to be a defining characteristic in a profession, I guess, but it isn't

189:. He is just one person doing his thing but it does seem like he is going to be a representative of the LGBT+ community on the world stage because he uses his spotlight to say things about queer culture and identity. If anyone here can find any useful way to develop his biography then that could be a path by means of which to showcase a Knowledge LGBT+ biography in a major way, and to connect a biography like his to the collection of LGBT+ content which Knowledge and Wikimedia projects have to offer. 31: 2337:

risk. (This is true for non-professionals, too, of course.) Do we have any reason to think that LGBT people are especially underrepresented in the field of economics? Is this true with different categories of employment—e.g., academia, government, corporate? If there's been anything written about such questions, or if you can find any data at all on it, I'd be inclined to accept the category. As it stands now, I'm just not sure.

699:

that way, but I can't think of any instances where it is effectively used so. The Random House unabridged and Collins dictionaries, as well as Wiktionary all define it, in noun form, as a "member of the LGBT community", which doesn't really fit in with how we're using it. They note that it's usually plural—"LGBTs" or "LGBT's"—which is more like how we're using it but is also typographically awkward and potentially confusing.

4257:

including noticeboards, requests for closure, SPI, CSD & etc. If you are an experienced editor with around two years (or more) of tenure, 10k edits give or take and no record of seriously disruptive behavior, please consider if you might be willing to help out the community by becoming an administrator. The community can only function as well as we all are willing to participate. If you are interested start by reading

1732: 2365:

LGBT+ activists seek to direct more LGBT+ people into STEM to counter a social myth that LGBT+ people should go into the arts and avoid the sciences. Being an LGBT+ person and in the sciences is defining in itself because of the particular attention in education and career services to place LGBT+ people into such roles as a way to identify under-recognized talent and promote professional diversity.

3518:

sexuality would be a positive move. Some cis hetero aces identify as queer due to non-normative sexual or romantic functions/appetites, despite hetero-normative orientation (target is separate from action), and have a really hard time doing so due to some over-simplified language when this and similar terms are being defined both by the public at large and often the LGBT+ community.

3830: 1662: 3069: 1693: 1894:, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time. 2121:

will take you to a message box — send me a message through there, and I'll respond with his e-mail address so you can make the arrangements. And yeah, I've done some editing on the article (punctuation, linking names when there was an article to link to, revising categories, etc.), but I haven't really added much content at all.

1371:. Taking the first link as an example, there is highlighting in the wikitext that shows where the lint error is. It says that the problem is in the ===Studio albums=== section; the actual problem is that the section above it has an unclosed table. So that table needs to be closed properly, and then that article will be fixed. 3331:

increasingly useful descriptor, and as an older gay person I have shifted my view from rejecting it to using it to describe myself, though as said above, it is not a word that includes everyone. Until there are widely accepted generic terms, compromises like "LGBT" or "LGBT plus" are handy and probably as good as we can find. --

4041:

group created this page. It has important historical value to the LGBT community for the following reasons: 1) It references a landmark decision by the Canadian Supreme Court to allow same sex couples to bring their partners to the prom. 2) The book prompted the Canadian Library Association to review their LGBT policy

2650:; the majority do not involve cases where the perpetrator was convicted of a hate crime. Several specifically mention that there was no hate crime legislation on the books at the time of the incident, or that it wasn't pursued in this case. I think it would be beneficial to move those articles to the parent category, 2984:. The "blitz" is a large number of bills brought forward in 20 states in the last two years, "presented as measures to preserve religious liberty, but are intended to give businesses, pastors and childcare providers the right to discriminate against LGBT people in line with their “sincerely held religious beliefs”." 2981: 2234:, that sort of thing. I don't see how LGBT economists would actually meet that standard. That said, there are certainly others (I can think of at least two off the top of my head, including one of the most famous economists in the entire history of economics), but that isn't the point: the category's degree of 4359:

Hello! I would love to make a WikiProject to upload more LGBTQ+ scientists and engineers to Knowledge. There are similar projects for other underrepresented groups (women in science, African-Americans in science...) and I often use them as inspiration for wikithons. If anyone is interested in joining

4269:

and open a discussion. Over the next few days experienced editors will take a look at your record and let you know what they think your chances are of passing RfA (the three most terrifying letters on Knowledge) as well as provide you with feedback on areas that might be of concern and how to prepare

4256:

For a number of years we have been experiencing a steady decline in the number of administrators as a result of attrition and a declining number of editors willing to consider adminship. Things have reached a point where we are starting to experience chronic backlogs in important areas of the project

3802:

Thanks for the advice. This is not an area where I have any real expertise or knowledge, I did see the pride flag on one of the photos of the Bear page so I imagined that it would be appropriate but as I'd seen these pride flags come up a couple of times and couldn't find anything on the project page

3517:

Is it possible that we could re-examine some of the top-level statements to acknowledge the validity of asexuality as part of this scope? While I don't ask that we reproduce all the information pertaining to this here, a nod to the existence of more than 2 scales (gender and orientation) that effect

2465:

Do they do economics differently from non-LGBT economists? Inherently work different places, study different things, find different results? Is there anyone studying LGBT economists work as a separate unit? I certainly allow for that possibility, but I'd want to see evidence, rather than just being a

2427:

At best it should be done with caution; some folks may remember the Women novelists category, in which a hubbub was raised because by being filed into that category, female authors were being taken out of the main Novelists category. So I would want to see that there is some compelling work out there

2364:

In the United States and elsewhere it is legal for employers to fire anyone for being LGBT+. Many employers still do such things. Consequently LGBT+ people as a class face discrimination in the job market for the best jobs, including professional positions like economist. It is general knowledge that

1166:

Since the article is about one person, there ideally would be a portrait or candid solitary shot for the infobox photo. Nevertheless, the existing image shows the subject reasonably clearly, so I don't see any pressing need to replace it. (If it were replaced, the current image should be moved to the

4497:

I'm confused about the categories... it's not slang, per se, as one can find it in academic discourse. Is there a ref specifically calling it "slang"? Also have any sources directly tied it into appropriation? Does that need to be spelled out directly in the article before the category is applied. I

3787:

The other two you mention I'd agree that they need more reliable sources that (a) there is a notable "pride" movement or community or culture or something for that particular group, (b) that that is a notable, and the predominantly-used flag for said pride movement/community/culture/etc. And at best

3736:

In 1995 The International Bear Brotherhood flag was trademarked and marketed. This design is not dissimilar from the Leather Flag. The colors represent all the fur colors and nationalities of Bears throughout the world (instead of a bruise) and the heart is replaced with a paw. What is unique about

3521:

Basically if we acknowledge it's validity as an orientation rather than lack thereof we should then re-examine some of our more umbrella statements and stances and see how they interface with the concept of metrics beyond the classic 2. (Remember, everyone is on the aro and ace scales, even if they

2692:

What should the next steps here be? Is this an Arbcom case, a report to WMF SuSa as an attempt to deride LGBT+ contributors, or is this something that should be kept low-key on the article talk page? I would be happy to invest some volunteer time in taking this forward, however my keyboard time will

1396:

for more information. The highlighting indicates that the problem is in a ref (number 25 at the moment; search for the word "not online" in the wikitext). This is a sort of nested citation-in-a-citation. Most of the citation will be italicized in the new system. A different approach should solve

698:

because it really doesn't say anything substantive about the 'B' or 'T' cohorts. That may well not be the case at some parallel articles, but we're still left with what I see as a grammatical issue. You say "LGBT" is also a noun. Could you give a couple examples of that? I can imagine it being used

4053:

Furthermore, when I went to reddit. I went to the wikipedia page and asked for advice on how to appeal this decision. I got a nasty reply from a "TPARIS" upon review, his site seem to skew very "pro heterosexual" marriage. He went on to post to my appeal to the editor that he would delete the page

754:

I want to again affirm that everything you are saying is correct and valid. This current system is no the best. Compared with anything else proposed, I only have not seen a better idea. I encourage you to check things out and make a counterproposal because this is not a dead or halted conversation.

4835:

It would benefit the encyclopaedia if there were some examples of genderqueer BLPs where the correct pronoun use was established outside of the above norms. I have yet to read an article for someone where their expressed preference excluded binary pronouns or the use of singular they. I would very

4338:

If there is a need to include coverage of their sexuality, then at most we should quote what they said, rather than try to interpret their discomfort with certain categories as meaning that they belong in some category. However, if we're not having other sources discussing their sexuality, I'm not

4040:

I appealed to the editor who deleted it and he felt no discussion came about in support as his sole reason for deleting the page. Please keep in mind that this page came about because LGBT studies editors reviewed "page requests" and felt this was of merit to the LGBT community to create. So, this

3458:

may not account for every permutation of sexual orientation and gender identity that an individual might identify with, it's unlikely to mislead anyone as to what the article is about. If it's a subtle form of erasure, well, we need to wait until that sinks in for enough people that something else

2545:

to start to collect sources describing how LGBT people have a different and particular experience in these fields which non-LGBT people do not have. The cited sources report that LGBT experience in science includes social pressures which make LGBT students in science shift majors to humanities and

5164:

Yeah, I have trouble with that list as a reliable source, because it looks like anyone can submit a form. And I would want more sign that shows there is some import or notability to the list to say that being on that list is important. (Which is a different question from whether being LGBTQ is an

4659:

Since there are no policies or guidelines on the matter, I can't really tell you what you should do. I can only give you my advice as a fellow editor. (I personally tend to err on the side of caution when it comes to BLPs, but I also tend to defer to the subject.) This is a very contentious issue

3760:

Then and now, tattoos continue to be significant markers of masculinity in these gay subcultures, and not coincidentally, the use of distinctive flags as decorations, apparel, and icons used in group rituals by these subcultures has flourished. I am thinking here specifically of the Leather Pride

2676:

I am concerned about the apparent misuse of Wikimedia, by making a public claim that the purge of LGBT people in Chechnya is "American fake news invented to demonise the Russian Federation". As far as I am aware there are no reliable sources that would support this, making it fictional conspiracy

2399:

trait of economists to the exclusion of every other occupation. And people have been talking about a new categorization system, whereby each individual characteristic would be applied as a standalone tag and "subcategories" would be generated by searching for the intersection of two distinct tags

2336:

Hmm. I have to say that I'm seeing both sides of the argument. I'm definitely sympathetic to what you're saying about LGBT professionals across the board, but I think the point that Bearcat makes is particularly valid here. Let's see...let's take it as a given that LGBT professionals' jobs are at

2120:

Okay, I messaged my friend and heard back that he's willing to talk to you, though for privacy reasons I'm obviously not going to give out his personal information on a Knowledge talk page. Go to my userpage, and in the left sidebar under "Tools" you'll see an option for "E-mail this user", which

666:

I can agree that the format "LGBT in (wherever)" is not the best format, because the term "LGBT" usually is an adjective and it seems confusing. However, "LGBT" is also a noun. I would not want articles called "Scientific in Mexico", etc, but there is no well established term for LGBT which means

2480:

I guess it depends on what you mean by "defining characteristic" and what you mean by "profession" and the intersection between the two. At the individual level, a person's LGBT status has a bearing on all aspects of their life, including the work they do, but only with certain occupations is it

2154:

I've not read the above discussion (sorry), but I added an infobox and made a few other minor changes. I was going to start adding "citation needed" tags throughout, but decide the tag up top was enough. That being said, if sources are not added soon, I'd support removal of all unsourced content

702:

The purpose of our "LGBT in..." articles is potentially quite broad, encompassing history, culture, law, politics and so forth among all of the populations represented by the letters in the abbreviation. For articles dealing with some countries, it may make sense to have an umbrella article like

494:

Hello! Wiki Education is developing a guide to help students write about all topics related to sexuality. The handout is meant to supplement other resources that they consult, such as an interactive training and basic editing brochures. We’d love to get some community feedback on the draft here:

3347:

I also have come to see "queer" as a nice term to describe myself, although I also use "gay". A close family member, who is queer herself, jokes about the "LGBTQIABCDEFGHIJK..." community, which is a humorous way to describe the current challenge, as you all have articulated well here. I am not

2368:

I do not think anyone should take English Knowledge categories too seriously right now. Within 3 years I expect that categories will come from Wikidata and not have intersections. People in this category will be "LGBT" and "economist" and it will be trivial to search them all without having the

2101:

Everything is obvious to those who already know, harder for those who don't. At the top of every Knowledge page, you'll find a tab mark "history". That will give you the editing history, and by clicking on the links marked "prev", you can see what a given edit change. That may help you find the

1311:

Me neither. Chattanooga is not a city where the city councillors would get an automatic NPOL pass just for existing, but being LGBT is not a free "more notable than other holders of this otherwise non-notable office" card either — so all we can evaluate him on is whether the referencing is good

706:

I'm really still in the early stages of thinking about this, but I'm guessing there are two issues that merit concern: the awkward grammar across the board and the appropriateness of such a title for certain specific articles. The latter issue is probably best addressed individually, article by

3577:

There have recently been a number of edits redefining this term. The article apparently gets very little editor attention, and it would benefit from having more eyes and input on it. I am soliciting such eyes/input from all the Wikiprojects which its talk page lists it as being of interest to.

4111:

They actually got great advice on reddit from yours truly. Unfortunately, they only seem to hear what they want to hear and get angry if they hear anything different. And I have no idea where he gets an idea that I do anything "pro heterosexual marriage". I moderate a pro-marriage equality

3619:

Yes, it does seem like most of the sources (both those that were in the entry before recent edits, and those recently added) only mention it in passing, and many or most are not reliable sources either, being self-published or otherwise not RS. I made a cursory check for high-quality academic

397:

I don't think there is either, and you're right to be wary of claiming he's the first. Frankly, I might be wary of that even with a decent source—not because of fears that the source was wrong but because it's hard to know exactly what it means unless the source gets very, very specific. For

3453:

I personally would prefer that to anything with a 'Q' in it, but except in the case of certain articles with a decidedly scientific bent, titles ought to reflect actual usage out there in the world (with some extra weight given to what reliable sources have used, if that can be definitively

1363:

What's needed right now is for someone to click these links and compare the side-by-side preview of the two parsers. If the "New" page looks okay, then something's maybe technically wrong with the HTML, but there's no immediate worry. If that column looks wrong, then it should be fixed.

3330:

Yes, it's a Pandora's box as getting a consensus to change usage would be difficult. The WM-LGBT+ user group compromised on "+" due to the need to include all sexual and gender minorities along with sticking to a name that non-LGBT identifying readers/users would understand. "Queer" is an

2436:

I will also concur with the hopes and expectations expressed that in the longer term, this sort of categorization goes away, that we'll be able to do a search for biographical articles that are flagged as both "economist" and "lesbian", say, rather than relying on these category overlaps.

2432:

Certainly, there has been enough attention paid to Maynard Keynes's sexuality that someone may well have done either a biographical survey ("here are ten LGBT economists and the influence they've had") or a study ("the average LGBT economist leans Keynesian, and makes 10% less than their

1865:

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template

3708:

Bear merchandise takes many forms and is easily available on the Internet and at bear runs. To mention just a few options, there are hats, clothing, and various manifestations of the bear flag, which displays a bear paw print and colors that represent both fur colors and diverse

2041:

hard to find. Talking to someone who was an original contributor would be amazing and really helpful, I really appreciate the offer. Also, excuse my ignorance please (I'm very new to Knowledge!) but does cleanup work mean editing rather than adding content? Thanks again, Bearcat

4600:

I'm not too versed in writing many things within the scope of LGBT Studies, or rather trans people within the scope of LGBT studies. I'm just wondering about the inclusion of a trans persons birth name if it's been widely included in articles and a book about the subject. For

5291:

I do not object to anyone citing the publication but my guess is that citations to GayToday would be better directed to the publication of the original journalist who had the scoop. Lots of papers are like this and the general principle of finding the original story applies.

4885:, and they have no firm preference, it would be consistent to use singular they as a pronoun. This may be something to open for discussion on the talk page before making changes across the article. Others may be aware of further statements about their latest preferences. -- 3424:

Ok, I read the recent move proposal. Although I'd like it to say LGBTQ or LGBT+, the consensus at this time is against that. Maybe it's "too progressive" of a change at this point in time. Since that move was specifically to LGBTQ, would LGBT+ be an acceptable compromise?

4625:

which says to only use the deadname in the first sentence if the person was notable under that name but doesn't address mentioning it anywhere later in the text. I think the general practice if it's well-sourced is to include it in the "Early life" section. Since the

3164:

I find it suspicious that they changed their name just after this happened. It could be the perfect distraction away from their apparent denial of transphobia. And I doubt the heteronormative media will report on it more, so "recentist" sources may be all we are left

2008:, and I didn't live in Toronto until after it was gone — so I've never really known very much about it. That said, I am personally acquainted with one person who's named in the article as one of the magazine's original contributors — so if talking to somebody who was 4165:

That’s the nature of editing by consensus. If someone thinks an article would be a good idea, but ultimately it turns out that there aren’t enough sources to support it, it will get deleted. It works better, on the whole, than making it very difficult to create

4977:

eligible for DYK, and I think very interesting. I'm out of town and can only edit on my phone, but if someone wants to give the article a look-over, expand by at least one sentence, and nominate it, I would be grateful and would be happy to return the favor. =

1549:

Seems an important topic that we certainly need an article for, but the mid-section has some OR leaps, and I'm not sure if the current title (my own adjustment) is the best title, or whether "sexual violence" might better encompass all aspects of the topic.

3666:

Hi I have seen quite a few articles recently that have had pride flags added with no sources to show these are widely used for that particular community. Is there any standard pratice for the addition of these flags? Some of the flags come from this source

4864:

came out recently as NB, but has stated that she has no preferred pronoun (as long as its said with respect). There's no agreement on the pronoun that should be used, do we stick with she/her, or, as some people are doing, use they/them. Just wondering!

823:

Interesting. I think that might just work. Anyone else have any thoughts? And what would be the best way to implement it to make sure that editors who are watching certain "LGBT in" articles but not this WikiProject page have the opportunity to comment?

2274:

When it comes to women, no, actually you couldn't. The old stupid stereotype about "women can't do math", which made it quite rare for women to get accepted in jobs that involved numbers (e.g. science, economics) until quite recently, means that there

866:

I'm clinging to your "almost" like a lifeline here. In all seriousness, I'm not sure that a project-wide RfC is necessary. Perhaps some boilerplate on all of the relevant talk pages would suffice (although I suppose that might come across as spammy).

1126:, so a bibliography may be apropos. I'm not expert enough to write the article myself. If it is written, hatnotes cross-referencing the articles should be added to both or a disambiguation page should be created. (The URLs are as accessed 4-19-18.) 5090:

is about a person who almost certainly meets the notability guidelines, but basically everything else about the article is problematic. The disambiguation isn't standard, the article is promotional, and there's a lot of focus on trivial details.

4736: 4605:, her birth name is known as its included in a number of articles about her as well as the book written about her and her family. Just wondering since people have been adding it and I just want to know whether to revert or not or if it's okay. 667:"everything LGBT". "LGBT rights in Mexico", "LGBT studies in Mexico", "LGBT culture in Mexico" each are insufficient. I agree that "LGBT" alone is not the term I want but what is better, and why? Can you suggest more and talk this through? 4710:

It should be noted that when people are Googled, the "thumbnail" version of Knowledge that is used, actually drops all deadnames as they are in brackets. This seems more respectful than Knowledge itself. Try it out with Chelsea Manning.

4138:

Your group created this page, you found out it didn't meet some criteria and therefore you won't fix it? Furthermore was the criteria the same when the page went up versus changes to the present criteria. Your reply doesn't make sense.

4679:

I think it possibly would be? Even though its discussed within the project MOS, I felt it a tad vague. Maybe elaborating more would help? As I'm sure it would help other editors who wish to not offend anyone write the wrong thing in.

4899:

Alright, I'll definitely open a discussion up so we can get a consensus and maybe a page notice to use they/them on the page in the future (as not everyone might know). I'll leave it as it is right now, but will open a discussion.

4533:. I thought this would be of interest to this WikiProject. I did create the article, and I believe her channel is notable, but I am looking for your honest opinions. Please consider making your voice heard over there. Thanks.-- 2404:

happen, then we can rethink and reorganize categories accordingly, but as long as it's still just the same pie in the sky dream it was in 2008 it's not a reason to start taking the existing categorization rules less seriously yet.

4090:

Unless you can find some reliable sources that have covered the book in some detail, an encyclopedia article is simply not warranted. Reddit is a terrible place to try to get advice about Knowledge, as you have no doubt found.-

3287:

One may be gay but not queer and vice versa. The construct of queerness partly grew out of Judith Butler's Gender Trouble, but it also has a left-wing ring to it. In purely theoretical terms, 'gay' is essentialist and 'queer' is

1906:. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals. 3604:

on that article is an RS. This is a blog-created neologism which caused a brief kerfuffle when other blogs reacted, and nothing since. I've been biding my time to ensure that it is truly stale and dead before nominating it.

736:

I am not able to pull an example of a reputable publication using the term "LGBT" as a noun. I agree that it is awkward and nonstandard, and I only advocate for the use of this term until and unless anyone proposes something

685:

This is something I've been vaguely aware of for a while, but seeing a recent requested move kind of put it in focus for me. I haven't made a comprehensive survey of these articles, and maybe I should, but what I've seen at

2209:

of people who could be filed in such a category is not the controlling factor in whether it should exist or not: the controlling factor is the question of whether the intersection of "LGBT" with "economists" represents a

1244:

we have is about her wedding so there's not much to work with. It's been a couple of days but has been on my mind so thought I'd bring it up here in the hopes that some more experienced editors might be able to assist.

4839:

That "lots" of nonbinary and genderqueer people are okay with the use of singular they, does not make it okay for us to presume that nobody else would find themselves being described with these pronouns as misgendering.

707:

article, but the former bothers me because it just seems wrong. You use the example "Scientific in Mexico", a good analogy. "Gay in Mexico" would be pretty much exactly parallel. I haven't thought of a simple solution.

3700:

is well-established, and the reference for it in the article is something other than an archive of the website you linked -- more references could easily be found if thought necessary, I suppose. A quick search brings

1701: 1684: 3861:

campaign, which runs during the month of June and seeks to create and improve LGBT-related content at Knowledge and other Wikimedia projects. In-person events are being organized in some cities, and editors can also

744:. Still, the social movement has been LGBT+ for a long time, and even if LGBT+ wiki articles focus on MSMs, I still think they should have an LGBT+ title because of overwhelming precedent for calling even that LGBT+. 4180:

I'm not sure what you mean by "my group" (I don't have a group). The article was deleted because the book is simply not important enough for an encyclopedia. The guidelines have existed almost a long a Knowledge.-

2782:

being driven by people who appear to be very favourable to "LGBT" issues and may find it emotionally gratifying to feel, by proxy, "persecuted" and so might not be able to approach the topic with a clear head and

1903: 292:, a book that details the history of gay men in Brazil. Is there any way it could be included into this Wikiproject? I think it has great importance to the conversation of homosexual identities in other nations. 2001:

I've done a bit of cleanup work on this page in the past, but I haven't done any of the detail work and really don't know very much about the magazine besides the fact that it existed. It was never as famous as

1855:

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

5283:

they fail to name an editor or an editorial board. Writers do not get by-lines and seem to not have their own named media presence. The publication seems to recycle journalism which originates elsewhere.

4993:

While on this note, I wasn't sure if the list of 50 could be included in the article. That would be a quick way to expand it to be eligible for DYK (not the list itself, but prose explaining the list). =

4664:

for some discussion of a fairly reliably sourced deadname and how it was ultimately dealt with. Maybe it would be worthwhile for us to come up with some sort of an essay or something as a WikiProject? --

2433:

straight-identifying counterpart") that would make it worthwhile. And there may be a worthwhile category on, say, economists who study LGBT issues (the economic effects of same-sex marriage, for example.)

3481:

I agree with the argument made by Rivertorch that we should stick to the most commonly recognized name, which would be LGBT. Definitely opposed to renaming just to Queer for the reasons others have said.

2466:

combination of two interesting and perhaps separately defining but unrelated attributes. If the combination is defining, I would expect to see some material in significant and reliable sources on it. --

3026:

that it is noteworthy and appropriate and not undue. It's unlikely that a single unit in a restaurant chain would ever be notable, so the argument made in the edit summary that you linked is specious.

1818: 3737:

this design is the marketing of it. It has found its way onto tee shirts, bumper stickers, baseball caps, watches, stained glass, quilts, floor rugs, license plates, luggage tags, buttoons and pins.

3529: 703:

that, but I suspect that for many countries the content will be so heavily weighted towards the L and G, and towards the topic of rights, that the title, grammar aside, doesn't make a lot of sense.

4644:

Alright, I'm just wondering since I want to fix the article up. Should I leave it out of the infobox? Because it's mentioned in there right now? And if we keep it in do I move it to "born as..."?

3893:

As a reminder for any articles you write or edit related to Pride 2018, please tag them with {{Wiki Loves Pride 2018}} on the Talk page so they will show up and be tracked on our results page -

3406:

I'd be fine with LGBTQ. I don't like LGBT+ at all, however. But the Q is hard to define (by definition), so perhaps we shouldn't make any changes at all. We already have a separate article about

2566: 2451:

Hi. Reply to all. I have a hard time understanding why you don't think being LGBT, in any profession, is a defining characteristic. I think it is. Could you please explain your rationale? Thanks!

1622: 3620:

references directly about the topic and didn't spot any. I am fine with waiting until current edits die back down (to see if they manage to add anything useful and not just POV) before an AFD.

2546:

also difficult career experiences as there is a tradition of expecting that a scientific workplace should avoid the public perception that it employs LGBT people. I hope this helps as a start.

636:

about the title and function of that article. Depending on how that discussion develops, it may have implications for other similarly titled articles. I'd welcome some additional perspectives.

2651: 2624: 2605: 1910: 2587:

Good point. "Violence" denotes a violent physical attack, including rape and other forms of sexual assault. Focusing on murder and manslaughter only would result in an incomplete article.

2305:

Well, we get harassed out of pursuing careers, and we can get fired for being LGBT in most jurisdictions. So yes, I think LGBT professionals (including LGBT economists) deserve categories.

1115: 361:

Maybe not undue, but the "one of" part makes it unacceptably vague, in my opinion. One of how many—three? thirty? And over how many years? It's just too imprecise, at least for the lede.

2766:

I'm not clear about the deriding contributors, but I have just now given a gender-related alert. I'd suggest ANI for these and other issues. That's got to be a first step before ArbCom.

1617:

The article is currently just a combination of original research and indiscriminate information. I would let the creator expand, as there's certainly something to write about. See:

1111: 4316: 1666: 1167:

Personal life section.) The template appears to have been added by a bot almost eight years ago and has generated no discussion in the interim. I'd just go ahead and remove it.

178:. It is in wiki spirit that when there are multiple published perspectives in journalism then wiki community members develop encyclopedic content in the usual wiki way based on 3863: 3834: 3822: 4230: 2785:" The idea that the contributors to the move discussion are using this persecution of LGBT+ people as a "proxy" for gratification is toxic and appears deliberately obnoxious. 747:"Rights" is not a summary of the issue. Like you say, these articles are the top-level catch all for "history, culture, law, politics". "Science in Mexico" currently goes to 4234: 2647: 2628: 2609: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 4044:

I also felt that the editor who deleted it ignored the fact that another editor told him the page was written within the "neutral" manner as it followed wiki guidelines.

2485:. I think that much may depend on the specifics: what is true for one individual and one profession isn't necessarily true for others. I don't know if that helps at all. 3533: 2533: 549: 2287:

is a thing — if you think it doesn't meet the standards spelled out by CATEGRS as to when an identity/occupation intersection is warranted, you're welcome to try it at

2218:

in a notable and encyclopedic way from non-LGBT economists: they do the job in a different way that's directly tied to sexuality, they produce a distinct LGBT-specific

1923: 1653: 4791:

Is there a style guide somewhere stating that they/their is only used when gender is unknown? Lots of nonbinary or genderqueer folks have adopted they/them pronouns.

4296:

I have been working on the Katharine Coman article for a couple of weeks, and today nominated it for GA status. If you are interested, please drop by to check it out.

3761:

flag, first displayed on 28 May 1989; the original Bear Flag, designed in 1992; and the International Bear Brotherhood Flag, designed in 1995; and all their variants.

2851:

The discussion about renaming the article has now been closed and the article moved, so the thread where the incident occurred will no longer be edited by anyone. --

2283:

analysis out there about women in those fields. I can't speak to whether the same exists for African-American economists or not, but I can say there is a reason why

1601:

Good point re: USA focus. Perhaps adding a 'globalize' tag would be better than changing the title. Or just give the creator(s) a little time to expand the article.

2214:

characteristic or not. That is, it would need to be demonstrated that there was something that made LGBT economists a distinct class of thing in their own right,

3101:

Reverted. RS has reply from corporate, that makes it a corporate issue. If anyone wants to blank this again, it's a talk page debate, not just a revert war. --

3788:

they should probably be in a section about iconography or the community or something like that and discussed as a proposed flag instead of being in the lead.

2681:). This is particularly disturbing as the person using the article talk page this way is a long term contributor, though they were once blocked for 3 days by 242:

I didn't really help that much with that article, all I really did was add his article from the Guardian. Will see if I can help improve it further though. --

5150:. To me, it's interesting, and we could mention that Sally self-identifies as LGBTQ, but it's difficult since it seems this list can be updated by anyone. = 4530: 1822: 1798: 1785: 1773: 1761: 1749: 175: 152:

due to copyvio and a lack of LGBT visibility. This topic may be of interest to members of this project so please lend a hand if you are so inclined. Thanks.

5231:

and others are discussing at that article's talk page. I am posting here because I thought the conversation might be of interest to people at this project.

2532:

I collected some supporting evidence that being LGBT+ could be a defining characteristic of being a scientist, and I feel that this evidence generalizes to

3553: 748: 2795:

would you add the DS/gg template to the talk page, now that Doug has considered it relevant? The template says that an admin should be the one doing it.

577:

Does anyone have the time to get Kirk's biography to describe After the Ball in a more NPOV way, making it a summary of the article on the book? Thanks.

5165:

important factor... but the fact that we cannot state which of those letters she is claimed to be by being on the list makes it a weak claim anyway.) --

597:

A discussion has been started to propose deletion of redirects of the form "List of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender-related films <by year: -->

5352:. Posting about this here since the article likely falls under the interest and knowledge base of several editors that contribute to this wikiproject. 1814: 616: 3022:

Due weight is a judgment call I wouldn't make without looking closely at the whole article (and maybe similar articles, as well), but it is entirely

2911:

The section says, "Tennessee law has punished hate crimes on the basis of sexual orientation since 2001." Is anyone able to retrieve examples please?

2670: 496: 4836:

much like to talk to a specific case, then help to propose extensions to MOS or TRANS rather than attempt to set guidelines based on hypotheticals.

3911:

Taking photos at Pride and want to upload to Commons? Check out the Wiki Loves Pride Photo Campaign where you can upload and tag all in one place!

2400:

rather than existing as standalone category tags in their own right, for about 10 years now without it ever actually happening — so if and when it

182:. Any wiki editing which makes more information available to access with less effort makes for a more positive discource for all parties involved. 3868: 2887:

Did some more work on the Womyn's land article. Anyone else interested in improving the article? See the article's Talk page for some suggestions.

1511:

had one. Introduced in 1800 & never abolished from a quick skim of the wp:fr article. Worth translating - I can't see we have anything on it.

47: 17: 4817:

quite commonly used by non-binary people, and has already been used in a considerable number of BLPs of notable non-binary people on Knowledge.

4037:

I am a novice here but I feel that this page was deleted for "weak reasons. "Re: Knowledge:Articles for deletion/This High School Has Closets"

599: 1669:, which is about an article that is within the scope of this WikiProject. Should the page format be changed from a bulleted list to a table? 499:. We're looking to gather feedback by April 18th. Feel free to respond here or on the draft's talk page if you're interested. Thanks so much! 270:

I hardly deserve any credit, and I still question the mentioning of his being vegan, it seems rather irrelevant to the rest of the article. --

3717: 4766:

doesn't work because it is used when the gender is unknown. In my opinion, we should restrict ourselves only to use the person's last name.

2797:

If you feel it appropriate, you may want to collapse the discussion thread created to discourage more disruptive comments along these lines.

2087:

I feel pretty silly! I figured there had to be something like that but I really could not find it. Thank you for the links. Super helpful!!

1368: 5196: 4732: 2257: 2716:

was for "disruption", meaning, in this case, a combination of edit warring and BLP violations? You're an arb, you know the procedure! :)

2102:

editors who did the changes that you are most interested in... although it looks like in this case Bearcat has you well taken care of. --

5225: 4553: 4425: 4420: 1572: 5102: 4429: 1881: 1739: 1393: 986: 4154: 3992: 2620: 4739:. Almost every day someone's changing the terminology, so if anyone has a solution to keep it stable I'm sure it would be welcome. 4737:

Talk:Columbia University rape controversy#What's this nonsense about " (Their pronouns. They go by they/them instead of she/her) "

4412: 1870: 383:

I was told he was the first (and only one), but the WSJ is more nuanced. I don't think there is definitive data on gay academics.

5039:: What you could (should?) do is create a referenced stub about each novel... Please ping me if you need help with this. Thanks. 3967: 3857: 2879: 2839: 468:. Some subcats have "gay male" in their title, some have "gay (male)" in their title, and some only have "gay" in their title. 117: 5192: 4210:

please? There are plenty of RS online. This could end up on the main page (at least the banning of conversion therapy might).

3963: 1554: 1543: 157: 3668: 4928:

is in need of a major clean-up. I will try to retrieve sources on Newspapers.com, but feel free to help if you can. Thanks!

2063: 1890: 610: 4731:

I'll admit I made a bit of a mess of this because I hadn't realised she identified as non-binary, but the article on the

5218: 5195:

These are two start/stub class articles on very important trans topics. The articles need serious help to improve them.

2572:

Should we only include anti-gay assaults that led to deaths? What about non-fatal (but still very violent) gay bashings?

1618: 1491: 2034: 2004: 1940: 1316:

or not. But this just amounts to exactly the same volume and depth and purely local geographic range of coverage that

1293: 1286: 504: 247: 2870:

I expanded the Womyn's land article, adding new content and adding new sources. The article could use some more work.

2686: 1911:

article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject

3880: 3647:

is in need of more in-line references before we can nominate it for RD on the main page, if anyone is interested...

2284: 2163: 1929:

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the

854: 318: 129: 112: 38: 1385: 4860:

So, I just have a question about what pronoun to use for a non-binary person who has no preferred pronoun. Actor

2253: 1367:

The first list is all "deletable table" errors. If you want to know more about how to fix these pages, then see

1240:

wanted to introduce it but I do think it is worth mentioning somewhere. My only issue is that for now, the only

960: 741: 442: 153: 5361: 5332: 5305: 5263: 5244: 5204: 5174: 5159: 5133: 5108: 5069: 5048: 5031: 5017: 5003: 4987: 4952: 4937: 4910: 4894: 4875: 4849: 4826: 4800: 4782: 4748: 4720: 4690: 4674: 4654: 4639: 4615: 4590: 4565: 4542: 4507: 4492: 4478: 4460: 4394: 4369: 4348: 4332: 4305: 4286: 4246: 4219: 4189: 4175: 4158: 4123: 4099: 4066: 4023: 4004: 3979: 3952: 3924: 3906: 3887: 3845: 3812: 3797: 3690: 3656: 3629: 3614: 3587: 3565: 3537: 3490: 3476: 3448: 3419: 3394: 3367: 3340: 3325: 3297: 3282: 3250: 3236: 3221: 3174: 3159: 3145: 3128: 3110: 3090: 3060: 3043: 3016: 2993: 2970: 2935: 2920: 2896: 2860: 2843: 2808: 2775: 2752: 2733: 2702: 2663: 2640: 2598: 2581: 2559: 2502: 2475: 2460: 2446: 2414: 2382: 2354: 2331: 2314: 2300: 2269: 2247: 2195: 2170: 2144: 2130: 2111: 2096: 2075: 2051: 2021: 1996: 1968: 1945: 1842: 1713: 1678: 1641: 1612: 1592: 1565: 1535: 1520: 1495: 1337: 1305: 1279: 1264: 1216: 1184: 1160: 1135: 1087: 1062: 1039: 998: 975: 902: 884: 861: 841: 818: 790: 768: 724: 680: 653: 622: 586: 561: 535: 508: 484: 454: 437:, we need some opinions on what to title the article. One recent move discussion section was made before I made 415: 392: 378: 355: 325: 304: 274: 265: 251: 236: 161: 133: 5276:

Being a reliable source is rarely a yes or no situation. Publications are reliable in their field of expertise.

5200: 4578: 4571: 4488: 4456: 3241:

We could rename it "LGBTQ," but not "queer." LGBTQ sounds more current than LGBT. Queer is a different concept.

2905: 1561: 1531: 1212: 1035: 890: 604: 557: 450: 186: 3746:

The Bear Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for Those Who Are Husky, Hairy, and Homosexual and Those Who Love 'Em

3227:

I'd say at least avoid the latter suggestion, as not all LGBT folks embrace the "queer" concept/descriptor. --

2176: 2712:, what think you? And what do you think given that they've been warned about BLP DS, and that their block on 3697: 1674: 1487: 1131: 1123: 1011: 1004: 945: 916:

I count 9 relevant articles (national or regional) that could be appropriately renamed as "LGBT life in X":

695: 531: 1381:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Congressional_LGBT_Equality_Caucus?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=81176253

338:

Would it be undue to add to his lede that he was "one of the first openly gay business school deans"? Both

5300: 5239: 5096: 5087: 5080: 4796: 3561: 3065:

I'd really have to look more closely first, and I've been trying to get offline for over a half hour now.

2721: 2554: 2542: 2395:

characteristic in the sense that's required to justify a category for LGBT economists, because it's not a

2377: 2140: 2092: 2047: 1994: 1964: 1916:

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

889:

There are fewer than 10 "LGBT in" articles of this type, so not very spammy. There are however, over 100

763: 675: 500: 300: 243: 231: 198: 1110:

who's a lawyer working for President Trump. Judging from the photos and according to one source, they're

806: 4745: 4282: 4150: 4062: 3976: 3873: 3362: 2990: 2772: 2616: 2593: 2156: 1930: 1607: 1483: 1103: 1082: 847: 691: 583: 571: 311: 218: 1442:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Homosexual_Law_Reform_Act_1986?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=47224467

1437:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Homosexual_Law_Reform_Act_1986?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=47224466

1232:

about including this former Miss America winner's marriage to a same-sex partner. I disagree with how

552:. The article is on my watchlist, but I haven't yet commented in the RfC. It so far only has one vote. 4207: 4196: 4146: 4073: 4058: 1353: 5170: 4561: 4538: 4416: 4365: 4344: 4142: 4113: 3808: 3686: 3525: 3468: 3232: 3195: 3082: 3035: 2962: 2494: 2471: 2442: 2346: 2107: 2071: 1584: 1407:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Brian_Paddick,_Baron_Paddick?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=87425510

1275: 1176: 876: 833: 782: 716: 645: 465: 407: 370: 5259: 5129: 5044: 5027: 5013: 4948: 4933: 4586: 4484: 4474: 4466: 4452: 4390: 4315:

I'm of two minds about a source, and wanted to solicit some outside input. My question pertains to

4262: 4215: 4000: 3652: 3415: 3293: 3246: 3170: 3141: 3124: 3056: 3012: 2931: 2916: 2835: 2636: 2577: 2456: 2327: 2310: 2265: 2191: 1709: 1557: 1527: 1477:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Bibliography_of_André_Gide?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=89257375

1472:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Bibliography_of_André_Gide?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=71339070

1467:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Bibliography_of_André_Gide?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=71339069

1457:

https://en.wikipedia.org/LGBT_history_in_Yugoslavia?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=87353402

1452:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Russian_gay_propaganda_law?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=86721234

1301: 1208: 1156: 1031: 1019: 955: 950: 633: 553: 446: 388: 351: 3985: 3894: 592:

Proposed deletion of "List of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender-related films <by year: -->

5324: 5319: 5155: 5065: 4999: 4983: 4902: 4867: 4682: 4646: 4607: 4081: 4019: 3995:

for example. But it does not look like he was a tenured professor, just an instructor with a PhD.

3674: 3610: 3601: 3401: 3390: 3376: 3051:: Thanks. Maybe you could revert it, since the edit summary seems misguided? Only if you want to. 2392: 2211: 1670: 1349: 1127: 1107: 1058: 1023: 527: 214: 3600:

This is not a notable topic and wouldn't not stand up to a proper Afd. Not a single one of the

185:

Of all the ways that Christopher could have chosen to present himself, he identifies himself in

4270:

yourself. Lastly you can find a list of experienced editors who may be willing to nominate you

1959:- working on it for my Master's Essay and would appreciate talking to whoever edited the page. 1904:

RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace

5293: 5232: 5092: 4822: 4792: 4777: 4503: 4328: 4242: 4171: 3948: 3936: 3920: 3902: 3793: 3557: 3522:

are lockstepped and white, they exist as useful defining metrics) Editors, consider please.

3353: 2659: 2547: 2410: 2370: 2296: 2243: 2202: 2136: 2126: 2088: 2043: 2017: 1981: 1960: 1838: 1516: 1333: 1229: 1200: 1148: 1141: 935: 756: 668: 541: 296: 261: 224: 171: 5147: 3835:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 June 26#Category:Opposition to same-sex marriage

3823:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 June 26#Category:Opposition to same-sex marriage

3744: 2654:, and then re-evaluate whether the subcategory is useful based on how many articles remain.-- 2056:

I know that you're new to Knowledge, so you may not know these things (forgive me if you do.)

1447:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Immigration_equality?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=73009878

846:

I almost wonder if a request for comment is appropriate. Many articles are involved here. ---

5349: 4861: 4740: 4661: 4301: 4278: 4271: 4120: 3971: 3486: 3357: 2985: 2892: 2875: 2767: 2729: 2713: 2709: 2588: 2038: 1956: 1849: 1602: 1257: 1077: 994: 971: 930: 898: 814: 690:

made me think that the article was quite redundant: all of its content could be rolled into

578: 5344:

There is an ongoing discussion about how to define trans women in the lede for the article

1621:. Notice that there is no "Violence against LGBT people in the United States" but there is 1412:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Coretta_Scott_King?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=92778340

1386:

https://en.wikipedia.org/RuPaul's_Drag_Race?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=92636842

1380: 5357: 5166: 4969: 4960: 4557: 4534: 4408: 4400: 4361: 4340: 3804: 3682: 3625: 3583: 3460: 3427: 3304: 3261: 3228: 3200: 3074: 3048: 3027: 2954: 2523: 2515: 2486: 2467: 2438: 2338: 2319: 2103: 2082: 2067: 1576: 1271: 1168: 1073: 1050: 868: 825: 774: 731: 708: 661: 637: 399: 362: 289: 271: 206: 5279:

This particular publication has markers of being lower quality even in its own field. On

4890: 4845: 4716: 4451:

now exists. I think it might be nominated for deletion by someone in the future, though.

3336: 3155: 3106: 2856: 2804: 2748: 2698: 1432:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Oak_Lawn,_Dallas?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=73054408

1352:, and I've found a few high-priority errors in articles tagged by this WikiProject. The 893:

categories, and that might be a separate CfD discussion if we want to rename those too.--

4754:

In my opinion, we should state that the person is non-binary. With regards to pronouns,

3768: 2155:

and/or moving unsourced content to the article's talk page for future consideration. ---

1427:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Alberto_Manguel?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=90635114

1422:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Alberto_Manguel?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=90635113

5271: 5255: 5141: 5125: 5055: 5040: 5023: 5009: 4944: 4943:

I've trimmed a lot and referenced most of it. Let me know if you can find more sources.

4929: 4582: 4554:

Talk:Oscar Wilde Memorial Sculpture #RfC on including sentence with offensive nicknames

4470: 4386: 4266: 4211: 4011: 3996: 3648: 3571: 3411: 3289: 3242: 3187: 3166: 3137: 3120: 3052: 3008: 2927: 2912: 2831: 2632: 2573: 2519: 2452: 2323: 2306: 2261: 2187: 2183: 1705: 1476: 1471: 1466: 1376:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Shane_McAnally?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=89775820

1297: 1235: 1201:

Talk:Slut-shaming#WP:Undue weight with regard to changing the lead sentence to "people"

1152: 1015: 940: 920: 802: 687: 384: 347: 125: 3349: 1441: 1436: 5312: 5214: 5188: 5151: 5061: 5036: 4995: 4979: 4670: 4635: 4627: 4602: 4320: 4258: 4185: 4135: 4095: 4077: 4015: 3940: 3841: 3671: 3606: 3386: 2288: 1636: 1313: 1151:, or should it be removed from the talkpage? The one in the infobox looks fine to me. 1054: 925: 567: 479: 434: 5226:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Psychiatry:_Gender_dysphoria_in_children_article

1417:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Sue_Perkins?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=92255699

1402:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Lily_Tomlin?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=92031895

809:

for the overarching article? I think this is a pattern that could work generally.--

310:

The WikiProject LGBT studies banner appears on the talk page, so we're set here! ---

5285: 4818: 4768: 4704: 4630:

article is nothing but a lead, it might be best to leave it out for the moment. --

4622: 4526: 4518: 4499: 4382: 4375: 4324: 4238: 4167: 3944: 3916: 3898: 3789: 3644: 3638: 2976:

Project Blitz: the legislative assault by Christian nationalists to reshape America

2655: 2527: 2406: 2292: 2280: 2239: 2223: 2122: 2028: 2013: 1976: 1834: 1627: 1512: 1508: 1406: 1329: 1241: 1222: 1192: 470: 257: 210: 202: 179: 149: 139: 4446: 3302:

Ok, am I opening a Pandora's box when I say should we add Q to all LGBT articles?

4763: 4759: 4755: 3937:

guidelines on the inclusion of birth names of trans individuals in lead sentences

3776:

Proceedings, The XIX International Congress of Vexillology, York, 23-27 July 2001

3136:: Do you think an RfC would be a good way to assess if the content is due or not? 2677:

theory, and it also appears to defame and deride all LGBT+ people in its intent (

1526:

I'm tied up in other things, but I concur that this is a very interesting topic!

1462:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Lil_Peep?action=parsermigration-edit&lintid=89220796

5345: 5338: 4925: 4919: 4297: 4117: 3545: 3482: 2947: 2888: 2871: 2825: 2790: 2725: 2682: 1731: 1456: 1451: 1249: 990: 967: 894: 810: 346:

deemed it sufficiently notable. It is already mentioned in the body of the text.

332: 194: 120:

Editors who have written about this matter on Knowledge are invited to comment.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5353: 4886: 4841: 4712: 4203: 3678: 3621: 3595: 3579: 3332: 3256: 3151: 3133: 3102: 2946:

Would any editor who actually has time today please check out the edit war at

2852: 2800: 2744: 2717: 2694: 1575:

would be a more accurate title. It is 100% American in its scope, at present.

1119: 519: 490:

Seeking feedback on a guide for students who edit articles in sexuality topics

3150:

No, it's not obvious enough to invest more time in. There are easier wins. --

1922:

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the

1888:

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members

1099: 5280: 5114: 4076:. Unfortunately, the book does not appear to meet our inclusion guidelines ( 3382: 1228:

Wondering if someone can help with this article, there is discussion on the

121: 116:

and the transgender character in the film. The discussion can be seen here:

4030:

NEED HELP!!! appealling a speedy deletion of a page that this group created

989:, but not sure where/how to correct all the interrelated pages and charts. 5318:

Looking for a second (or third, or forth...) set of eyes over at Nicole's

5060:

Totally. Some already exist. Then we could link and/or make a category. =

4727:

Language in an article that discussed someone who identifies as non-binary

2238:

or lack thereof is what matters, not the raw number of potential entries.

1501: 4666: 4631: 4182: 4132: 4106: 4092: 3912: 3838: 2830:"Oh, that editor. They've been running amok all over the place." - MTE. – 426: 1446: 773:

OK, thanks. I'll give it some thought, and I hope others will weigh in.

4339:

sure the sexuality datum rises to the level that it need be covered. --

3554:

Knowledge:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Definition_of_"trans_woman"

2428:

about LGBT economists before saying that they should be separated out.

2012:

would help, I'd be happy to ask him if he'd be willing to talk to you.

1076:

section on the Drag queen Talk page and register your opinion. Thanks!

1702:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Transgender Education Network of Texas

1685:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Transgender Education Network of Texas

1411: 3897:-- this helps to show our community contribution to Knowledge. --- 3259:

says queer is an all encompassing term, for all non hetero or cis.

2059: 1667:

Talk:List of lesbian periodicals in the United States#Format change

1431: 1098:

Perhaps an article should be written on the Ty Cobb who's a lawyer

1053:

about changing from one sidebar to another on the article. Thanks,

4660:

that comes up a lot. If you're interested, you can take a look at

3556:

with broad implications for Trans * articles. Please take a look.

3407: 1426: 1421: 1094:

Two attorneys are named Ty Cobb and for one we may want an article

600:" title="Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 7": --> 523: 4735:

is continually having problems. See me jumping in ignorantly at

3895:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Wiki_Loves_Pride/2018/Results

3194:

I'm wondering if we should add a Q to the end, or maybe call it

2391:

job. That doesn't make being an LGBT practitioner of that job a

1375: 1120:

may have been mentioned in several articles in an LGBT newspaper

3115:

I expanded it (the staff had to be retrained, etc.) and it was

2708:

Oh, that editor. They've been running amok all over the place.

1862:

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

740:

I confirm that almost all publication of LGBT+ issues is about

174:

is an LGBT+ scientist currently in the news to comment on the

25: 4556:

that may be of interest to those in this project. Thank you.

4054:

too. So, there seems to be some vindictive bias in his post.

522:

which may interest members of this project. It can be found

3941:

WP:VPP#Guidelines regarding birth names of trans individuals

3803:

about how to deal with them I though it best to ask. cheers

2567:

History of violence against LGBT people in the United States

1730: 1623:

History of violence against LGBT people in the United States

1416: 1401: 1507:-or French licence to cross-dress, perhaps only for women. 1122:, which may be enough to establish notability, and he also 985:

Judgement decriminalized buggery today. I updated the page

5008:

I think our readers would want to know. I certainly would.

4469:: References 1 to 5 should be merged as they are the same. 4050:

I am asking for your help in appealing this bad decision.

2652:

Category:Violence against LGBT people in the United States

2625:

Category:Violence against LGBT people in the United States

2606:

Category:Violence against LGBT people in the United States

3715:

Mann, Jeff (2010). "Bear Culture 101 (no prerequisite)".

3670:. Pages that have had these poorly sourced flags include 1955:

Taking a chance and posting to see if anyone here edited

1270:

Thanks for the heads-up; I've joined the conversation. --

3872:, so feel free to show off your work. Happy editing! --- 3356:. I learned a lot reading it! Knowledge is awesome. :O) 3255:

Different how? I know he's not the whole community, but

1461: 5322:

over the inclusion of the word "activist" in her LEDE.

5121: 4813:

used when the gender is simply unknown — singular-they

4442: 4438: 4434: 3116: 3004: 2678: 2387:

LGBT people are at risk of discrimination or firing in

1204: 1027: 438: 110:

There is an ongoing content dispute regarding the film

3855:

Project members are invited to contribute to the 2018

4762:

don't work as the person is not male and not female.

4621:

There's not a lot of guidance on this issue. We have

3913:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/Campaign:WikiLovesPride

2799:

I've been bold and done the latter myself. Thanks --

4231:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rua Farme de Amoedo

4112:subreddit; so that seems to fly in the face of his 4235:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Frei Caneca Street 4047:I did not write the wikipage nor am I the author. 2648:Category:American victims of anti-LGBT hate crimes 2629:Category:American victims of anti-LGBT hate crimes 2610:Category:American victims of anti-LGBT hate crimes 1573:Sexual assault of LGBT people in the United States 4360:me, that would be great! It is my first project. 2534:science, technology, engineering, and mathematics 550:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Gold star lesbian 223:Thanks for developing the article to this point. 2182:Are there enough openly LGBT economists besides 2062:gives you a list of every edit to that article, 1654:List of lesbian periodicals in the United States 518:There is an RfC on the talk page of the article 167:Christopher Wylie being queer on the world stage 4385:. You may or may not want to expand it. Thanks! 4292:Katharine Coman article nominated for GA status 3758: 3734: 3706: 2780:Thanks. The deriding contributors is based on " 1328:show, which is not enough to make him special. 1022:links should be in the See also section of the 628:LGBT in Mexico and articles with similar titles 5022:Having said that, the list may be copyrighted? 4014:, and an unusual death is not enough for GNG. 3769:"Flag Tattoos: Markers of Class and Sexuality" 2541:I do not have the entire story, but I started 2430:It would not at all surprise me if there were. 1116:photo of the White House attorney is available 256:You're welcome. I couldn't leave it uncreated. 5146:the other link I could find on this group is 4548:RfC at Oscar Wilde Memorial Sculpture started 1199:Opinions are needed on the following matter: 8: 2037:is proving hard to avoid and information on 1369:mw:Help:Extension:Linter/deletable-table-tag 1014:, opinions are needed on whether or not the 176:Facebook and Cambridge Analytica data breach 118:Talk:Ace Ventura: Pet Detective#Transphobic? 2631:please? There is no consistency at present. 1392:This second list is "misnested tags". See 1026:article. A permalink for the discussion is 749:History of science and technology in Mexico 4881:As the statement is that they identify as 4140: 3833:You are invited to join the discussion at 3523: 2693:be very limited until next week. Thanks -- 1848:WikiProject collaboration notice from the 1815:Women in Red/English language mailing list 1665:You are invited to join the discussion at 1553:Published just today through AFC process: 1354:wikitext parser is going to change in June 2252:Well, you could say the same thing about 1394:mw:Help:Extension:Linter/html5-misnesting 1191:Defining slut-shaming in the lead of the 2671:Talk:Gay concentration camps in Chechnya 1700:You may, or may not, want to comment on 1482:For more help, you can ask questions at 497:User:Cassidy (Wiki Ed)/Sexuality studies 441:. The article is likely to go through a 4581:. You may or may not want to expand it. 3530:2A04:AE08:1006:FD00:794B:D640:6DD9:34F2 1879:The discussion about this can be found 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies 3958:Discussions on gender neutral language 3718:The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide 2952:Full protection will likely be needed. 1742:June 2018 worldwide online editathons. 634:Talk:LGBT in Mexico#Title and function 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4552:Hi there, an RfC has been started at 3778:. London: The Flag Institute. p. 209. 3003:Hello. I need a second opinion about 2743:Thanks for adding the ping Drmies. -- 1719:June Women in Red focus on LGBT/Pride 1147:Do we still need a photo request for 281:Adding an article to this Wikiproject 7: 5350:Talk:Trans_woman#RfC_on_introduction 5348:. This discussion can be found here 4733:Columbia University rape controversy 4525:An article about the trans YouTuber 3935:There is a discussion regarding the 3066: 2258:Category:African-American economists 1951:Looking for editor of Rites Magazine 548:Some here might want to weigh in at 3749:. New York: Harrington Park. p. 16. 3007:. Do you really think it was undue? 2926:Also, the link/RS from HRC is dead. 2906:LGBT rights in Tennessee#Hate_crime 2646:I've looked at several articles in 288:I recently created the article for 148:A lot of reviving is being done on 987:LGBT rights in Trinidad and Tobago 24: 5254:GayToday.com is not an RS, is it? 4274:. Thank you and happy editing... 2621:Killing of Allen R. Schindler Jr. 603:if you have not already done so. 4529:has been nominated for deletion 4498:did some general fixes, though. 3968:Knowledge:Village pump (policy)‎ 3828: 3552:A discussion is taking place at 3352:that we have an article titled, 3073:If it's still there tomorrow... 3067: 1919:So far, 84 editors have joined. 1691: 1660: 1045:Feedback requested at Drag queen 1012:Talk:Lesbian literature#See also 1005:Talk:Lesbian literature#See also 29: 4086:click on the links an read them 2369:intersection "LGBT economist". 1819:Women in Red/international list 1542:New article needs more eyes at 460:Naming categories about gay men 5193:Doe v. Regional School Unit 26 5120:I need a second opinion about 4809:the case that "they/their" is 4229:Please consider commenting at 3964:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style 3459:becomes the most common term. 1859:Portals are being redesigned. 1555:Sexual assault of LGBT persons 1544:Sexual assault of LGBT persons 1049:Your feedback is requested at 755:You might find a better idea. 1: 4596:Inclusion of birth/dead names 2260:, yet those categories exist. 1801:#1day1woman Global Initiative 1502:Permission de travestissement 1356:, and any page with an error 1106:. There's already one on the 305:09:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC) 5219:Gender dysphoria in children 5210:Gender dysphoria in children 4703:Having run into issues with 4319:regarding Canadian musician 3866:. Results are being tracked 2865: 1619:Violence against LGBT people 1344:HTML errors in LGBT articles 1068:And IMHO this discussion is 632:I've opened a discussion at 3383:this recent failed proposal 1704:and/or improve the article. 1294:Chris Anderson (politician) 1287:Chris Anderson (politician) 429:article -- what to title it 5377: 5362:02:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC) 5333:23:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC) 5306:13:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC) 5245:12:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC) 5205:09:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC) 5175:14:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 5160:14:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC) 5109:21:17, 1 August 2018 (UTC) 5086:The newly-created article 4206:?) interested in creating 2720:, you know I have to ping 2248:23:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC) 2196:22:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC) 1689: 1652:Discussion about article " 1338:23:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC) 1280:15:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC) 1265:15:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC) 1217:00:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC) 1185:03:56, 22 April 2018 (UTC) 1161:22:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC) 1136:23:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC) 1088:20:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC) 1063:22:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC) 1040:10:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC) 999:16:58, 12 April 2018 (UTC) 903:16:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC) 885:04:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC) 862:18:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 842:17:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 819:14:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC) 791:18:51, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 769:15:31, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 725:15:10, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 681:14:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 654:06:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC) 326:18:11, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 275:16:51, 27 March 2018 (UTC) 266:23:31, 26 March 2018 (UTC) 252:19:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC) 237:13:59, 26 March 2018 (UTC) 162:17:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC) 134:16:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC) 113:Ace Ventura: Pet Detective 106:Ace Ventura: Pet Detective 5264:18:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 5183:Collaboration Nominations 5134:00:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 5070:20:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 5049:16:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 5032:15:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 5018:15:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 5004:14:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4988:14:03, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4953:18:03, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 4938:16:01, 31 July 2018 (UTC) 4911:21:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4895:19:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4876:18:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4850:09:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4827:16:02, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 4721:09:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC) 4691:22:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 4675:22:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 4655:21:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 4640:21:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 4616:20:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC) 4591:22:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC) 4566:11:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC) 4543:01:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC) 4508:04:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 4493:04:17, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 4479:04:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 4461:04:11, 24 July 2018 (UTC) 4395:16:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC) 4381:Hello. I've just created 4370:19:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 4349:18:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 4333:15:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 4306:03:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC) 3953:14:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC) 3925:14:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 3907:14:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 3846:14:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC) 3813:15:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 3798:15:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 3767:Guenter, Scot M. (2009). 3691:14:01, 25 June 2018 (UTC) 3657:05:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC) 3630:19:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC) 3615:03:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC) 3588:16:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC) 3566:18:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC) 3538:12:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC) 3491:00:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC) 3175:19:49, 10 June 2018 (UTC) 3160:19:40, 10 June 2018 (UTC) 3146:19:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC) 3129:12:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC) 2254:Category:Women economists 1823:Women in Red/Opt-out list 1727: 1725: 1306:17:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 976:16:58, 8 April 2018 (UTC) 961:LGBT in the United States 742:Men who have sex with men 623:21:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC) 598:". Please participate in 587:15:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC) 562:21:00, 6 April 2018 (UTC) 536:01:50, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 509:17:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 485:14:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC) 455:23:06, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 416:21:59, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 393:18:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 379:15:30, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 356:09:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC) 4801:18:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 4783:17:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 4749:15:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 4579:Tom Gallagher (diplomat) 4572:Tom Gallagher (diplomat) 4287:02:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 4247:22:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 4220:14:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 4190:16:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 4176:16:17, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 4159:16:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 4124:19:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 4100:16:05, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 4067:15:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 4024:18:12, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 4005:17:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 3980:16:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC) 3888:01:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 3743:Kampf, Ray, ed. (2000). 3477:22:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC) 3449:19:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC) 3420:07:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3395:07:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3368:23:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3341:07:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3326:06:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3298:04:45, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3283:04:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3251:04:21, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3237:04:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3222:04:15, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 3111:16:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 3091:14:23, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 3061:14:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 3044:13:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 3017:09:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 2994:20:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 2971:19:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC) 2936:12:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 2921:12:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 2897:02:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC) 2880:03:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC) 2861:15:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC) 2844:19:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 2809:17:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 2776:16:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 2753:15:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 2734:15:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 2703:14:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 2664:13:09, 5 June 2018 (UTC) 2641:19:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 2599:23:57, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 2582:20:28, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 2560:10:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC) 2503:17:49, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 2476:04:32, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 2461:03:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 2322:: Second opinion please? 2177:Category:LGBT economists 2171:20:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 2145:21:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 2131:21:49, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 2112:23:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 2097:21:42, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 2076:21:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 2052:21:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 2022:18:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 1997:14:52, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 1969:14:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 1946:10:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC) 1843:10:30, 29 May 2018 (UTC) 1714:15:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC) 1679:02:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC) 1292:I am not convinced that 1203:. A permalink for it is 891:Category:LGBT by country 187:Category:LGBT scientists 5217:is having a talk about 3348:opposed to LGBTQ. Btw, 2999:Transgender controversy 2447:19:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 2415:18:37, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 2383:14:00, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 2355:06:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 2332:05:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC) 2315:04:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 2301:03:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 2270:00:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 2135:I've just emailed you! 1931:WikiProject's talk page 1902:On April 8th, 2018, an 1871:Transclude lead excerpt 1764:Singers and Songwriters 1642:21:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 1613:20:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 1593:17:18, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 1566:06:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 1536:06:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC) 1521:00:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC) 1496:00:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC) 1312:enough to get him over 1051:Talk:Drag queen#Sidebar 946:LGBT in the Middle East 696:Homosexuality in Mexico 601:the redirect discussion 340:The Wall Street Journal 5088:Jason Greene (Freckle) 5081:Jason Greene (Freckle) 4967:I started the article 4406:For those interested, 4131:So, let me understand 3991:Does he pass GNG? See 3782: 3753: 3729: 2543:LGBT people in science 1735: 4072:Welcome to Knowledge 4057:Thank you in advance 3931:Birth names guideline 3359:- Mark D Worthen PsyD 2617:Death of Sean Kennedy 2615:Should articles like 2590:- Mark D Worthen PsyD 2230:LGBT economists as a 2186:to create a category? 1788:Geofocus: Russia/USSR 1734: 1604:- Mark D Worthen PsyD 1484:Knowledge talk:Linter 1104:Human Rights Campaign 1079:- Mark D Worthen PsyD 692:LGBT rights in Mexico 572:After the Ball (book) 42:of past discussions. 5215:WikiProject Medicine 4662:Talk:Danica_Roem#RFC 4225:Two AFDs of interest 3962:Are taking place at 3864:participate remotely 2866:Womyn's land article 2536:including economics. 1296:is notable, are you? 1118:.) The HRC attorney 466:Category:Gay culture 4467:User:Flyer22 Reborn 4202:Is anyone (perhaps 3381:Yes, you are. See 2722:User:Claíomh Solais 2285:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 2226:analysis out there 1850:Portals WikiProject 1360:display strangely. 1112:not the same person 1020:bisexual literature 956:LGBT in Puerto Rico 951:LGBT in New Zealand 807:LGBT life in Mexico 606:E to the Pi times i 154:HickoryOughtShirt?4 5281:their "about" page 4973:on Saturday. It's 3675:Bear (gay culture) 2623:be categorized in 1924:newsletter archive 1736: 1488:Whatamidoing (WMF) 1350:Special:LintErrors 1348:I'm going through 1072:. Please read the 1024:Lesbian literature 443:WP:Requested moves 344:Poets & Quants 5330: 4908: 4873: 4688: 4652: 4613: 4355:LGBTQ+ Scientists 4276: 4161: 4145:comment added by 4087: 4010:Unlikely to pass 3915:Happy Pride! --- 3540: 3528:comment added by 3475: 3474: 3405: 3380: 3354:Intersex and LGBT 3089: 3088: 3042: 3041: 2969: 2968: 2755: 2501: 2500: 2353: 2352: 2222:of work, there's 1941:The Transhumanist 1831: 1830: 1826: 1802: 1789: 1777: 1765: 1753: 1591: 1590: 1263: 1183: 1182: 1149:F. O. Matthiessen 1142:F. O. Matthiessen 936:LGBT in Guatemala 883: 882: 840: 839: 789: 788: 723: 722: 652: 651: 542:Gold star lesbian 501:Cassidy (Wiki Ed) 414: 413: 377: 376: 244:Emir of Knowledge 199:Emir of Knowledge 172:Christopher Wylie 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5368: 5331: 5329: 5327: 5303: 5298: 5275: 5242: 5237: 5187:I am nominating 5145: 5105: 5099: 5059: 4909: 4907: 4905: 4874: 4872: 4870: 4862:Bex Taylor-Klaus 4805:It's definitely 4780: 4776: 4774: 4771: 4765: 4761: 4757: 4743: 4689: 4687: 4685: 4653: 4651: 4649: 4614: 4612: 4610: 4450: 4432: 4275: 4208:LGBT Action Plan 4197:LGBT Action Plan 4110: 4085: 4016:Roger (Dodger67) 3974: 3883: 3876: 3875:Another Believer 3858:Wiki Loves Pride 3851:Wiki Loves Pride 3832: 3831: 3780: 3779: 3773: 3751: 3750: 3727: 3726: 3599: 3471: 3466: 3465: 3447: 3399: 3374: 3365: 3360: 3324: 3281: 3220: 3085: 3080: 3079: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3038: 3033: 3032: 2988: 2965: 2960: 2959: 2829: 2794: 2770: 2742: 2714:St. Gallen Group 2596: 2591: 2557: 2552: 2531: 2497: 2492: 2491: 2380: 2375: 2349: 2344: 2343: 2166: 2159: 2158:Another Believer 2086: 2035:The Body Politic 2032: 2005:The Body Politic 1992: 1991: 1988: 1985: 1980: 1957:Rites (magazine) 1944: 1875: 1869: 1812: 1805: 1803: 1800: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1756: 1754: 1751: 1723: 1722: 1695: 1694: 1664: 1663: 1639: 1635: 1633: 1630: 1610: 1605: 1587: 1582: 1581: 1320:city councillor 1260: 1255: 1246: 1239: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1124:wrote an article 1085: 1080: 931:LGBT in Colombia 879: 874: 873: 857: 850: 849:Another Believer 836: 831: 830: 785: 780: 779: 766: 761: 735: 719: 714: 713: 678: 673: 665: 648: 643: 642: 619: 613: 607: 581: 482: 478: 476: 473: 410: 405: 404: 373: 368: 367: 321: 314: 313:Another Believer 234: 229: 222: 219:Hyperactive dave 180:reliable sources 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5376: 5375: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5342: 5325: 5323: 5316: 5301: 5294: 5288:is non-notable. 5269: 5252: 5240: 5233: 5212: 5185: 5139: 5118: 5103: 5097: 5084: 5053: 4970:Lost Gay Novels 4965: 4961:Lost Gay Novels 4923: 4903: 4901: 4868: 4866: 4858: 4778: 4772: 4769: 4767: 4741: 4729: 4683: 4681: 4647: 4645: 4608: 4606: 4598: 4577:I have created 4575: 4550: 4523: 4423: 4409:Straightwashing 4407: 4404: 4401:Straightwashing 4379: 4357: 4313: 4294: 4254: 4227: 4200: 4104: 4032: 3989: 3972: 3960: 3933: 3886: 3881: 3874: 3853: 3829: 3826: 3781: 3771: 3766: 3765: 3752: 3742: 3741: 3728: 3714: 3713: 3664: 3642: 3593: 3575: 3550: 3515: 3473: 3469: 3426: 3363: 3358: 3303: 3288:constructivist. 3260: 3199: 3196:Queer Community 3192: 3087: 3083: 3068: 3049:User:Rivertorch 3040: 3036: 3001: 2986: 2978: 2967: 2963: 2944: 2909: 2868: 2823: 2788: 2768: 2674: 2613: 2594: 2589: 2570: 2555: 2548: 2513: 2499: 2495: 2378: 2371: 2351: 2347: 2320:User:Rivertorch 2281:reliable source 2224:reliable source 2180: 2169: 2164: 2157: 2080: 2026: 1989: 1986: 1983: 1982: 1974: 1953: 1937: 1900: 1873: 1867: 1853: 1821:. Unsubscribe: 1813:(To subscribe: 1799: 1797: 1786: 1784: 1774: 1772: 1762: 1760: 1752:WiR Loves Pride 1750: 1748: 1743: 1721: 1698: 1697: 1692: 1688: 1661: 1658: 1637: 1631: 1628: 1626: 1608: 1603: 1589: 1585: 1571:At the moment, 1547: 1505: 1346: 1290: 1258: 1250: 1233: 1226: 1197: 1181: 1177: 1145: 1096: 1083: 1078: 1047: 1008: 983: 881: 877: 860: 855: 848: 838: 834: 787: 783: 764: 757: 729: 721: 717: 676: 669: 659: 650: 646: 630: 617: 611: 605: 595: 579: 575: 546: 544:deletion debate 516: 492: 480: 474: 471: 469: 464:Take a look at 462: 431: 412: 408: 375: 371: 336: 324: 319: 312: 290:Beyond Carnival 283: 232: 225: 192: 169: 143: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5374: 5372: 5341: 5336: 5315: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5296:Blue Rasberry 5289: 5277: 5251: 5248: 5235:Blue Rasberry 5229: 5228: 5211: 5208: 5197:91.110.126.179 5184: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5117: 5112: 5083: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5073: 5072: 5034: 5020: 4964: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4922: 4917: 4916: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4857: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4837: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4803: 4786: 4785: 4728: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4708: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4597: 4594: 4574: 4569: 4549: 4546: 4522: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4485:Flyer22 Reborn 4453:Flyer22 Reborn 4403: 4398: 4378: 4373: 4356: 4353: 4352: 4351: 4312: 4309: 4293: 4290: 4253: 4250: 4226: 4223: 4199: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4178: 4129: 4128: 4127: 4126: 4088: 4031: 4028: 4027: 4026: 3988: 3983: 3959: 3956: 3932: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3909: 3878: 3852: 3849: 3825: 3821:Discussion at 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3805:Dom from Paris 3784: 3783: 3763: 3755: 3754: 3739: 3731: 3730: 3711: 3709:nationalities. 3703: 3702: 3683:Dom from Paris 3663: 3660: 3641: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3574: 3572:Cotton ceiling 3569: 3549: 3542: 3514: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3493: 3479: 3467: 3397: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3191: 3188:LGBT community 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3131: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3081: 3034: 3000: 2997: 2977: 2974: 2961: 2943: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2908: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2867: 2864: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2786: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2737: 2736: 2673: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2612: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2550:Blue Rasberry 2538: 2537: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2493: 2478: 2434: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2373:Blue Rasberry 2366: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2345: 2317: 2184:Raphael Bostic 2179: 2174: 2161: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2133: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2057: 1999: 1952: 1949: 1899: 1896: 1852: 1846: 1829: 1828: 1808: 1807: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1782: 1781: 1770: 1769: 1758: 1757: 1746: 1745: 1740:Women in Red's 1737: 1728: 1726: 1720: 1717: 1690: 1687: 1682: 1657: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1596: 1595: 1583: 1558:MatthewVanitas 1546: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1528:MatthewVanitas 1504: 1499: 1486:. Good luck, 1480: 1479: 1474: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1439: 1434: 1429: 1424: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1391: 1389: 1388: 1383: 1378: 1359: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1225: 1220: 1209:Flyer22 Reborn 1196: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1175: 1144: 1139: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1046: 1043: 1032:Flyer22 Reborn 1016:gay literature 1007: 1002: 982: 979: 964: 963: 958: 953: 948: 943: 941:LGBT in Mexico 938: 933: 928: 923: 921:LGBT in Canada 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 875: 852: 832: 803:LGBT in Mexico 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 781: 759:Blue Rasberry 752: 745: 738: 715: 704: 700: 688:LGBT in Mexico 671:Blue Rasberry 644: 629: 626: 594: 590: 574: 565: 554:Flyer22 Reborn 545: 539: 515: 512: 491: 488: 461: 458: 447:Flyer22 Reborn 430: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 406: 369: 335: 330: 329: 328: 316: 282: 279: 278: 277: 268: 254: 227:Blue Rasberry 168: 165: 142: 137: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5373: 5364: 5363: 5359: 5355: 5351: 5347: 5340: 5337: 5335: 5334: 5328: 5326:QueerFilmNerd 5321: 5314: 5313:Nicole Maines 5311: 5307: 5304: 5299: 5297: 5290: 5287: 5282: 5278: 5273: 5268: 5267: 5266: 5265: 5261: 5257: 5249: 5247: 5246: 5243: 5238: 5236: 5227: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5220: 5216: 5209: 5207: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5190: 5189:Nicole Maines 5182: 5176: 5172: 5168: 5163: 5162: 5161: 5157: 5153: 5149: 5143: 5138: 5137: 5136: 5135: 5131: 5127: 5123: 5116: 5113: 5111: 5110: 5106: 5100: 5094: 5089: 5082: 5079: 5071: 5067: 5063: 5057: 5052: 5051: 5050: 5046: 5042: 5038: 5037:User:Paul2520 5035: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5021: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5007: 5006: 5005: 5001: 4997: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4976: 4972: 4971: 4963: 4962: 4958: 4954: 4950: 4946: 4942: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4935: 4931: 4927: 4921: 4918: 4912: 4906: 4904:QueerFilmNerd 4898: 4897: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4884: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4871: 4869:QueerFilmNerd 4863: 4855: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4838: 4834: 4833: 4828: 4824: 4820: 4816: 4812: 4808: 4804: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4789: 4788: 4787: 4784: 4781: 4775: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4747: 4744: 4738: 4734: 4726: 4722: 4718: 4714: 4709: 4706: 4702: 4701: 4692: 4686: 4684:QueerFilmNerd 4678: 4677: 4676: 4672: 4668: 4663: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4650: 4648:QueerFilmNerd 4643: 4642: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4628:Nicole Maines 4624: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4611: 4609:QueerFilmNerd 4604: 4603:Nicole Maines 4595: 4593: 4592: 4588: 4584: 4580: 4573: 4570: 4568: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4547: 4545: 4544: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4528: 4520: 4517: 4509: 4505: 4501: 4496: 4495: 4494: 4490: 4486: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4465: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4458: 4454: 4448: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4431: 4427: 4422: 4418: 4414: 4410: 4402: 4399: 4397: 4396: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4377: 4374: 4372: 4371: 4367: 4363: 4354: 4350: 4346: 4342: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4322: 4321:Hubert Lenoir 4318: 4311:Hubert Lenoir 4310: 4308: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4291: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4273: 4268: 4265:. Then go to 4264: 4260: 4251: 4249: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4224: 4222: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4198: 4195: 4191: 4187: 4184: 4179: 4177: 4173: 4169: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4148: 4144: 4137: 4134: 4125: 4122: 4119: 4115: 4108: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4097: 4094: 4089: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4055: 4051: 4048: 4045: 4042: 4038: 4035: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3987: 3984: 3982: 3981: 3978: 3975: 3969: 3965: 3957: 3955: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3938: 3930: 3926: 3922: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3908: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3884: 3877: 3871: 3870: 3865: 3860: 3859: 3850: 3848: 3847: 3843: 3840: 3836: 3824: 3820: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3786: 3785: 3777: 3770: 3762: 3757: 3756: 3748: 3747: 3738: 3733: 3732: 3724: 3720: 3719: 3710: 3705: 3704: 3699: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3673: 3672:Fat fetishism 3669: 3661: 3659: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3646: 3640: 3637: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3603: 3597: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3573: 3570: 3568: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3547: 3543: 3541: 3539: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3519: 3512: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3478: 3472: 3464: 3463: 3457: 3452: 3451: 3450: 3446: 3445: 3442: 3439: 3436: 3433: 3430: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3403: 3402:edit conflict 3398: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3378: 3377:edit conflict 3373: 3369: 3366: 3361: 3355: 3351: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3323: 3322: 3319: 3316: 3313: 3310: 3307: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3280: 3279: 3276: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3258: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3244: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3218: 3215: 3212: 3209: 3206: 3203: 3197: 3189: 3186: 3176: 3172: 3168: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3117:removed again 3114: 3113: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3099: 3092: 3086: 3078: 3077: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3039: 3031: 3030: 3025: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3014: 3010: 3006: 2998: 2996: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2983: 2975: 2973: 2972: 2966: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2941: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2907: 2904: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2863: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2827: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2792: 2787: 2784: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2690: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2672: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2611: 2607: 2604: 2600: 2597: 2592: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2568: 2565: 2561: 2558: 2553: 2551: 2544: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2512: 2511: 2504: 2498: 2490: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2431: 2426: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2403: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2381: 2376: 2374: 2367: 2363: 2362:Keep category 2360: 2356: 2350: 2342: 2341: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2318: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2178: 2175: 2173: 2172: 2167: 2160: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2119: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2084: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2058: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2040: 2036: 2030: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2006: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1993: 1978: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1958: 1950: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1934: 1932: 1927: 1925: 1920: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1907: 1905: 1897: 1895: 1893: 1892: 1886: 1884: 1883: 1877: 1872: 1863: 1860: 1857: 1851: 1847: 1845: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1827: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1810: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1791: 1779: 1776:Women in GLAM 1767: 1755: 1741: 1733: 1729: 1724: 1718: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671:Woodsy lesfem 1668: 1655: 1651: 1643: 1640: 1634: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1606: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1588: 1580: 1579: 1574: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1556: 1551: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1433: 1430: 1428: 1425: 1423: 1420: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1395: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1355: 1351: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1288: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1261: 1256: 1254: 1243: 1237: 1231: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1180: 1172: 1171: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1143: 1140: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1128:Nick Levinson 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1093: 1089: 1086: 1081: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1044: 1042: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1006: 1003: 1001: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 980: 978: 977: 973: 969: 962: 959: 957: 954: 952: 949: 947: 944: 942: 939: 937: 934: 932: 929: 927: 926:LGBT in Chile 924: 922: 919: 918: 917: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 887: 886: 880: 872: 871: 865: 864: 863: 858: 851: 845: 844: 843: 837: 829: 828: 822: 821: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 792: 786: 778: 777: 772: 771: 770: 767: 762: 760: 753: 750: 746: 743: 739: 733: 728: 727: 726: 720: 712: 711: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 684: 683: 682: 679: 674: 672: 663: 658: 657: 656: 655: 649: 641: 640: 635: 627: 625: 624: 620: 614: 608: 602: 591: 589: 588: 585: 582: 573: 569: 568:Marshall Kirk 566: 564: 563: 559: 555: 551: 543: 540: 538: 537: 533: 529: 528:Beyond My Ken 525: 521: 513: 511: 510: 506: 502: 498: 489: 487: 486: 483: 477: 467: 459: 457: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 435:Talk:Gay lisp 428: 425: 417: 411: 403: 402: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 382: 381: 380: 374: 366: 365: 360: 359: 358: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 334: 331: 327: 322: 315: 309: 308: 307: 306: 302: 298: 293: 291: 286: 280: 276: 273: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 253: 249: 245: 241: 240: 239: 238: 235: 230: 228: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 190: 188: 183: 181: 177: 173: 166: 164: 163: 159: 155: 151: 146: 141: 138: 136: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5343: 5317: 5295: 5286:GayToday.com 5253: 5250:GayToday.com 5234: 5230: 5213: 5186: 5119: 5093:power~enwiki 5085: 4974: 4968: 4966: 4959: 4924: 4882: 4859: 4814: 4810: 4806: 4793:Newimpartial 4730: 4705:MOS:DEADNAME 4623:MOS:DEADNAME 4599: 4576: 4551: 4527:ContraPoints 4524: 4519:ContraPoints 4405: 4383:Angela Bowen 4380: 4376:Angela Bowen 4358: 4314: 4295: 4263:WP:RFAADVICE 4255: 4228: 4201: 4141:— Preceding 4130: 4056: 4052: 4049: 4046: 4043: 4039: 4036: 4033: 3990: 3986:Doran George 3961: 3934: 3867: 3856: 3854: 3827: 3775: 3759: 3745: 3735: 3722: 3716: 3707: 3665: 3645:Dick Leitsch 3643: 3639:Dick Leitsch 3602:link clutter 3576: 3558:Newimpartial 3551: 3524:— Preceding 3520: 3516: 3461: 3455: 3443: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3431: 3428: 3320: 3317: 3314: 3311: 3308: 3305: 3277: 3274: 3271: 3268: 3265: 3262: 3216: 3213: 3210: 3207: 3204: 3201: 3193: 3075: 3028: 3023: 3002: 2979: 2955: 2951: 2945: 2910: 2869: 2850: 2796: 2781: 2691: 2675: 2614: 2571: 2549: 2487: 2482: 2429: 2401: 2396: 2388: 2372: 2361: 2339: 2276: 2236:definingness 2235: 2231: 2227: 2219: 2215: 2206: 2181: 2153: 2137:Queermaessay 2089:Queermaessay 2044:Queermaessay 2009: 2003: 1961:Queermaessay 1954: 1939: 1936:Thank you. 1935: 1928: 1921: 1918: 1915: 1908: 1901: 1889: 1887: 1880: 1878: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1854: 1832: 1811: 1796:Continuing: 1744: 1699: 1659: 1577: 1552: 1548: 1509:Rosa Bonheur 1506: 1481: 1397:this error. 1390: 1366: 1362: 1347: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1291: 1252: 1248:... Thanks, 1247: 1227: 1223:Deidre Downs 1198: 1193:Slut-shaming 1169: 1146: 1097: 1069: 1048: 1009: 984: 965: 915: 869: 826: 805:, how about 775: 758: 709: 670: 638: 631: 596: 576: 547: 517: 493: 463: 445:discussion. 432: 400: 363: 343: 339: 337: 297:NeuroCoxinha 294: 287: 284: 226: 191: 184: 170: 150:Daniela Vega 147: 144: 140:Daniela Vega 111: 109: 78: 43: 37: 5346:trans woman 5339:Trans woman 5167:Nat Gertler 4926:Lige Clarke 4920:Lige Clarke 4742:Doug Weller 4341:Nat Gertler 4317:this source 4279:Ad Orientem 4252:HELP WANTED 4166:articles.-- 4147:Tews~enwiki 4082:WP:BOOKCRIT 4074:Tews~enwiki 4059:Tews~enwiki 3973:Doug Weller 3662:Pride Flags 3546:Trans woman 3229:Nat Gertler 3190:name change 2987:Doug Weller 2948:Trans woman 2942:Trans woman 2769:Doug Weller 2710:Doug Weller 2483:necessarily 2468:Nat Gertler 2439:Nat Gertler 2393:WP:DEFINING 2212:WP:DEFINING 2104:Nat Gertler 2068:Nat Gertler 1909:There's an 1738:Welcome to 1272:Nat Gertler 801:Instead of 593:" redirects 580:Doug Weller 333:Steve Salbu 285:Hello all, 36:This is an 4558:Amsgearing 4535:MattMauler 4362:Jesswade88 4114:accusation 3679:Drag queen 3513:Asexuality 3462:Rivertorch 3257:Dan Savage 3076:Rivertorch 3029:Rivertorch 2956:Rivertorch 2524:NatGertler 2516:Rivertorch 2488:Rivertorch 2340:Rivertorch 2205:, the raw 2203:WP:CATEGRS 2083:NatGertler 1898:Background 1578:Rivertorch 1322:everywhere 1170:Rivertorch 870:Rivertorch 827:Rivertorch 776:Rivertorch 732:Rivertorch 710:Rivertorch 662:Rivertorch 639:Rivertorch 520:Neo-Nazism 401:Rivertorch 364:Rivertorch 272:kelapstick 207:Kelapstick 98:Archive 70 90:Archive 66 85:Archive 65 79:Archive 64 73:Archive 63 68:Archive 62 60:Archive 60 5320:talk page 5272:Zigzig20s 5256:Zigzig20s 5142:Zigzig20s 5126:Zigzig20s 5124:. Thanks. 5115:Sally Oey 5056:Zigzig20s 5041:Zigzig20s 5024:Zigzig20s 5010:Zigzig20s 4945:Zigzig20s 4930:Zigzig20s 4583:Zigzig20s 4471:Zigzig20s 4387:Zigzig20s 4212:Zigzig20s 4116:.--v/r - 3997:Zigzig20s 3698:Bear flag 3649:Zigzig20s 3548:Lede text 3544:NPOVN on 3412:Zigzig20s 3290:Zigzig20s 3243:Zigzig20s 3167:Zigzig20s 3138:Zigzig20s 3121:Zigzig20s 3053:Zigzig20s 3009:Zigzig20s 3005:this edit 2928:Zigzig20s 2913:Zigzig20s 2832:Roscelese 2633:Zigzig20s 2574:Zigzig20s 2520:Zigzig20s 2453:Zigzig20s 2324:Zigzig20s 2307:Zigzig20s 2262:Zigzig20s 2216:different 2188:Zigzig20s 2064:this page 2060:This page 1706:Zigzig20s 1298:Zigzig20s 1236:Anthony22 1230:talk page 1153:Zigzig20s 1100:who works 1070:important 385:Zigzig20s 348:Zigzig20s 5152:paul2520 5062:paul2520 4996:paul2520 4980:paul2520 4856:Pronouns 4155:contribs 4143:unsigned 3966:and the 3725:(5): 24. 3607:Mathglot 3526:unsigned 3387:Mathglot 3024:possible 2840:contribs 1696:Resolved 1242:sourcing 1102:for the 1055:Mathglot 981:Trinidad 618:contribs 439:this one 427:Gay lisp 4819:Bearcat 4500:Umimmak 4426:protect 4421:history 4325:Bearcat 4267:WP:ORCP 4239:Doncram 4233:and/or 4204:User:Fæ 4168:Trystan 4034:Hello, 4012:WP:PROF 3945:Trystan 3917:FULBERT 3899:FULBERT 3790:Umimmak 3134:User:Fæ 2656:Trystan 2528:Bearcat 2526:, and 2407:Bearcat 2293:Bearcat 2279:actual 2240:Bearcat 2123:Bearcat 2029:Bearcat 2014:Bearcat 1977:Bearcat 1835:Ipigott 1513:Johnbod 1330:Bearcat 1195:article 1108:Ty Cobb 1074:Sidebar 737:better. 295:Best, 258:Keizers 217:, and 211:Apokrif 203:Keizers 145:Hello! 130:contrib 39:archive 5302:(talk) 5241:(talk) 4975:almost 4773:umbolo 4430:delete 4298:AnaSoc 4259:WP:MOP 4078:WP:GNG 3483:AnaSoc 3364:(talk) 2889:AnaSoc 2872:AnaSoc 2826:Drmies 2791:Drmies 2726:Drmies 2724:here. 2683:Drmies 2595:(talk) 2556:(talk) 2397:unique 2379:(talk) 2289:WP:CFD 2207:number 1632:umbolo 1609:(talk) 1326:always 1324:could 1314:WP:GNG 1084:(talk) 991:SusunW 968:Pharos 895:Pharos 811:Pharos 765:(talk) 677:(talk) 475:umbolo 233:(talk) 215:Rafe87 195:Neun-x 5354:Rab V 4483:Yep. 4447:views 4439:watch 4435:links 3837:. - 3772:(PDF) 3622:-sche 3596:-sche 3580:-sche 3470:WATER 3408:Queer 3165:with. 3084:WATER 3037:WATER 2964:WATER 2783:NPOV. 2496:WATER 2389:every 2348:WATER 2232:group 2228:about 2039:Rites 2033:Yes, 2010:there 1783:New: 1771:New: 1759:New: 1747:New: 1586:WATER 1318:every 1178:WATER 1114:. (A 878:WATER 835:WATER 784:WATER 718:WATER 647:WATER 409:WATER 372:WATER 16:< 5358:talk 5260:talk 5201:talk 5191:and 5171:talk 5156:talk 5148:this 5130:talk 5122:this 5066:talk 5045:talk 5028:talk 5014:talk 5000:talk 4984:talk 4949:talk 4934:talk 4891:talk 4883:enby 4846:talk 4823:talk 4811:only 4797:talk 4764:They 4758:and 4746:talk 4717:talk 4671:talk 4636:talk 4587:talk 4562:talk 4539:talk 4531:here 4504:talk 4489:talk 4475:talk 4457:talk 4443:logs 4417:talk 4413:edit 4391:talk 4366:talk 4345:talk 4329:talk 4302:talk 4283:talk 4272:here 4261:and 4243:talk 4237:. -- 4216:talk 4172:talk 4151:talk 4080:and 4063:talk 4020:talk 4001:talk 3993:this 3977:talk 3949:talk 3921:talk 3903:talk 3882:Talk 3869:here 3809:talk 3794:talk 3696:The 3687:talk 3677:and 3653:talk 3626:talk 3611:talk 3584:talk 3562:talk 3534:talk 3487:talk 3456:LGBT 3416:talk 3391:talk 3337:talk 3294:talk 3247:talk 3233:talk 3171:talk 3156:talk 3142:talk 3125:talk 3107:talk 3057:talk 3013:talk 2991:talk 2982:this 2980:See 2932:talk 2917:talk 2893:talk 2876:talk 2857:talk 2836:talk 2805:talk 2773:talk 2749:talk 2730:talk 2699:talk 2679:diff 2660:talk 2637:talk 2578:talk 2472:talk 2457:talk 2443:talk 2411:talk 2402:does 2328:talk 2311:talk 2297:talk 2266:talk 2244:talk 2220:type 2201:Per 2192:talk 2165:Talk 2141:talk 2127:talk 2108:talk 2093:talk 2072:talk 2048:talk 2018:talk 1965:talk 1891:here 1882:here 1839:talk 1817:and 1710:talk 1675:talk 1562:talk 1532:talk 1517:talk 1492:talk 1334:talk 1302:talk 1276:talk 1251:CJ 1213:talk 1205:here 1157:talk 1132:talk 1059:talk 1036:talk 1028:here 1018:and 995:talk 972:talk 899:talk 856:Talk 815:talk 694:and 612:talk 584:talk 570:and 558:talk 532:talk 524:here 505:talk 451:talk 389:talk 352:talk 342:and 320:Talk 301:talk 262:talk 248:talk 158:talk 126:talk 122:Erik 5221:at 4807:not 4779:^^^ 4760:she 4667:irn 4632:irn 4521:AfD 4188:🖋 4107:MrX 4098:🖋 4084:).← 3943:.-- 3939:at 3844:🖋 3701:up: 3350:TIL 2687:ref 2627:or 2619:or 2608:or 2256:or 1638:^^^ 1358:may 1259:Oz 1010:At 514:RfC 481:^^^ 433:At 132:) 5360:) 5262:) 5203:) 5173:) 5158:) 5132:) 5107:) 5101:, 5068:) 5047:) 5030:) 5016:) 5002:) 4986:) 4951:) 4936:) 4893:) 4887:Fæ 4848:) 4842:Fæ 4840:-- 4825:) 4815:is 4799:) 4756:he 4719:) 4713:Fæ 4711:-- 4673:) 4638:) 4589:) 4564:) 4541:) 4506:) 4491:) 4477:) 4459:) 4445:| 4441:| 4437:| 4433:| 4428:| 4424:| 4419:| 4415:| 4393:) 4368:) 4347:) 4331:) 4304:) 4285:) 4245:) 4218:) 4183:Mr 4174:) 4157:) 4153:• 4133:Mr 4093:Mr 4065:) 4022:) 4003:) 3970:. 3951:) 3923:) 3905:) 3839:Mr 3811:) 3796:) 3774:. 3764:— 3740:— 3723:17 3721:. 3712:— 3689:) 3681:. 3655:) 3628:) 3613:) 3586:) 3564:) 3536:) 3489:) 3418:) 3393:) 3385:. 3339:) 3333:Fæ 3296:) 3249:) 3235:) 3198:? 3173:) 3158:) 3152:Fæ 3144:) 3127:) 3109:) 3103:Fæ 3059:) 3015:) 2950:? 2934:) 2919:) 2895:) 2878:) 2859:) 2853:Fæ 2842:) 2838:⋅ 2807:) 2801:Fæ 2751:) 2745:Fæ 2732:) 2718:Fæ 2701:) 2695:Fæ 2689:) 2662:) 2639:) 2580:) 2522:, 2518:, 2474:) 2459:) 2445:) 2437:-- 2413:) 2330:) 2313:) 2299:) 2291:. 2277:is 2268:) 2246:) 2194:) 2143:) 2129:) 2110:) 2095:) 2074:) 2050:) 2020:) 1967:) 1938:— 1933:. 1926:. 1913:. 1885:. 1876:. 1874:}} 1868:{{ 1841:) 1833:-- 1712:) 1677:) 1625:. 1564:) 1534:) 1519:) 1494:) 1336:) 1304:) 1278:) 1253:in 1215:) 1207:. 1159:) 1134:) 1061:) 1038:) 1030:. 997:) 974:) 966:-- 901:) 817:) 621:) 615:| 560:) 534:) 526:. 507:) 453:) 391:) 354:) 303:) 264:) 250:) 213:, 209:, 205:, 201:, 197:, 160:) 128:| 94:→ 64:← 5356:( 5274:: 5270:@ 5258:( 5199:( 5169:( 5154:( 5144:: 5140:@ 5128:( 5104:ν 5098:π 5095:( 5064:( 5058:: 5054:@ 5043:( 5026:( 5012:( 4998:( 4982:( 4947:( 4932:( 4889:( 4844:( 4821:( 4795:( 4770:w 4715:( 4669:( 4634:( 4585:( 4560:( 4537:( 4502:( 4487:( 4473:( 4455:( 4449:) 4411:( 4389:( 4364:( 4343:( 4327:( 4300:( 4281:( 4277:- 4241:( 4214:( 4186:X 4170:( 4149:( 4136:X 4121:P 4118:T 4109:: 4105:@ 4096:X 4061:( 4018:( 3999:( 3947:( 3919:( 3901:( 3885:) 3879:( 3842:X 3807:( 3792:( 3685:( 3651:( 3624:( 3609:( 3598:: 3594:@ 3582:( 3560:( 3532:( 3485:( 3444:! 3441:3 3438:8 3435:F 3432:T 3429:C 3414:( 3410:. 3404:) 3400:( 3389:( 3379:) 3375:( 3335:( 3321:! 3318:3 3315:8 3312:F 3309:T 3306:C 3292:( 3278:! 3275:3 3272:8 3269:F 3266:T 3263:C 3245:( 3231:( 3217:! 3214:3 3211:8 3208:F 3205:T 3202:C 3169:( 3154:( 3140:( 3123:( 3119:. 3105:( 3055:( 3011:( 2930:( 2915:( 2891:( 2874:( 2855:( 2834:( 2828:: 2824:@ 2803:( 2793:: 2789:@ 2747:( 2728:( 2697:( 2685:( 2658:( 2635:( 2576:( 2530:: 2514:@ 2470:( 2455:( 2441:( 2409:( 2326:( 2309:( 2295:( 2264:( 2242:( 2190:( 2168:) 2162:( 2139:( 2125:( 2106:( 2091:( 2085:: 2081:@ 2070:( 2046:( 2031:: 2027:@ 2016:( 1990:G 1987:M 1984:G 1979:: 1975:@ 1963:( 1837:( 1825:) 1708:( 1673:( 1656:" 1629:w 1560:( 1530:( 1515:( 1490:( 1332:( 1300:( 1274:( 1238:: 1234:@ 1211:( 1155:( 1130:( 1057:( 1034:( 993:( 970:( 897:( 859:) 853:( 813:( 734:: 730:@ 664:: 660:@ 609:( 556:( 530:( 503:( 472:w 449:( 387:( 350:( 323:) 317:( 299:( 260:( 246:( 221:: 193:@ 156:( 124:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 64 - Knowledge

Index