141:
33:
325:, approving the building for its building regulations, failed to recognise the problem. When the building became dangerously unstable, the claimant was unable to raise any money for repairs, chose not to sue anyone at that stage and therefore had to sell the house at a considerable loss. He sought to recover his loss from
386:
case, building regulations are part of the bylaws of the local council and require that notice should be given to the council both at the commencement of the work and at specific stages, such as when the foundation trenches were ready to be poured. Councils have the powers to inspect the foundations
391:, the House of Lords considered whether the local council were under any duty of care toward owners or occupiers of houses as regards inspection during the building process and unanimously decided that a duty of care existed and that was not barred by a "limitation of actions" statute.
243:
409:. That is to say that if someone has a right, someone else owes a duty. The inspectors have a right to inspect, and the builder has a duty to let them inspect.
500:
285:
228:
151:
238:
209:
50:
387:
and to require any corrections necessary to bring the work into conformity with the bylaws, but they are not under an obligation to do so. In
223:
305:
300:
266:
218:
289:
116:
97:
397:
has been overruled, with the conclusion that a person who has a right has no duties implicitly attached to that right.The jurists
69:
140:
495:
76:
54:
510:
490:
329:, but the action failed as the loss, the deflated value he obtained for the house, was classed as a pure economic loss.
233:
83:
310:
326:
65:
43:
343:
505:
351:
402:
438:
As the case concerned economic loss, not personal injury, the House of Lord's statement on that point is
90:
17:
426:
459:
341:
and held that the council was not liable in the absence of physical injury. Also, the case of
322:
213:
429:, the House of Lords has been able to depart from its own precedent to achieve justice.
484:
440:
281:
475:
191:
172:
398:
367:
32:
363:
359:
463:
321:
A builder failed to build proper foundations to a house. The defendant
355:
293:
26:
252:
202:
197:
187:
165:
157:
147:
133:
57:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
8:
370:, all of which have preferred the two-stage
284:, 1 AC 398 was a judicial decision of the
139:
130:
117:Learn how and when to remove this message
418:
454:Dias, Reginald Walter Michael (1976).
405:have shown that rights and duties are
259:This case overturned a previous ruling
476:Full text of decision from BAILII.org
7:
306:Anns v Merton London Borough Council
267:Anns v Merton London Borough Council
55:adding citations to reliable sources
277:Murphy v Brentwood District Council
18:Murphy v Brentwood District Council
350:The judgment was rejected in some
25:
31:
501:1990 in United Kingdom case law
42:needs additional citations for
374:test of proximity and policy.
1:
337:The House of Lords overruled
288:in relation to recovery for
311:duty of care in English law
527:
327:Brentwood District Council
344:Dutton v Bognor Regis UDC
264:
257:
192:House of Lords transcript
138:
427:1966 Practice Statement
354:jurisdictions, notably
66:"Murphy v Brentwood DC"
496:English tort case law
282:[1991] UKHL 2
173:[1991] UKHL 2
134:Murphy v Brentwood DC
511:Borough of Brentwood
491:House of Lords cases
51:improve this article
407:jural correlatives
309:with respect to a
290:pure economic loss
347:was disapproved.
273:
272:
127:
126:
119:
101:
16:(Redirected from
518:
468:
467:
451:
445:
436:
430:
423:
198:Court membership
143:
131:
122:
115:
111:
108:
102:
100:
59:
35:
27:
21:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
481:
480:
472:
471:
453:
452:
448:
437:
433:
424:
420:
415:
382:Just as in the
380:
335:
323:local authority
319:
260:
248:
214:Lord Chancellor
183:
123:
112:
106:
103:
60:
58:
48:
36:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
524:
522:
514:
513:
508:
506:1990s in Essex
503:
498:
493:
483:
482:
479:
478:
470:
469:
446:
431:
417:
416:
414:
411:
379:
376:
334:
331:
318:
315:
286:House of Lords
271:
270:
262:
261:
258:
255:
254:
250:
249:
247:
246:
241:
236:
231:
226:
221:
216:
206:
204:
203:Judges sitting
200:
199:
195:
194:
189:
185:
184:
182:
181:
178:
175:
169:
167:
163:
162:
159:
155:
154:
152:House of Lords
149:
145:
144:
136:
135:
125:
124:
39:
37:
30:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
523:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
488:
486:
477:
474:
473:
465:
461:
457:
456:Jurisprudence
450:
447:
443:
442:
435:
432:
428:
422:
419:
412:
410:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
390:
385:
377:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
346:
345:
340:
332:
330:
328:
324:
316:
314:
312:
308:
307:
303:the decision
302:
297:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
269:
268:
263:
256:
251:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
211:
208:
207:
205:
201:
196:
193:
190:
186:
179:
176:
174:
171:
170:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
146:
142:
137:
132:
129:
121:
118:
110:
99:
96:
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
75:
71:
68: –
67:
63:
62:Find sources:
56:
52:
46:
45:
40:This article
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
455:
449:
441:obiter dicta
439:
434:
421:
406:
394:
393:
388:
383:
381:
371:
352:Commonwealth
349:
342:
338:
336:
320:
304:
298:
276:
275:
274:
265:
253:Laws applied
244:Lord Jauncey
229:Lord Brandon
180:2 All ER 908
161:26 July 1990
128:
113:
104:
94:
87:
80:
73:
61:
49:Please help
44:verification
41:
399:Mickey Dias
368:New Zealand
239:Lord Oliver
234:Lord Ackner
224:Lord Bridge
210:Lord Mackay
485:Categories
425:Since the
413:References
378:Reflection
299:The court
219:Lord Keith
188:Transcript
77:newspapers
364:Singapore
360:Australia
301:overruled
166:Citations
107:June 2016
333:Judgment
177:1 AC 398
464:2668655
403:Hohfeld
158:Decided
91:scholar
462:
356:Canada
212:, the
93:
86:
79:
72:
64:
317:Facts
280:
148:Court
98:JSTOR
84:books
460:OCLC
401:and
395:Anns
389:Anns
384:Anns
372:Anns
366:and
339:Anns
294:tort
70:news
292:in
53:by
487::
458:.
362:,
358:,
313:.
296:.
466:.
444:.
120:)
114:(
109:)
105:(
95:·
88:·
81:·
74:·
47:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
