261:
However, Martin also found that the formula underperformed the S&P 500 slightly during the 2007-2011 period and actually went negative for a time. Additionally, over the entire 2003-2015 period, the strategy exhibited more volatility compared to the S&P 500. In his evaluation, Martin found that the almost 3% outperformance was remarkable, though it fell short of the 30% returns claimed in
Greenblatt's book. It is important to note that different sample periods are used by Greenblatt and Martin. Moreover, Martin highlighted the presence of "significant psychological risk" associated with under-performance during the aftermath of the 2007-2008 financial crisis.
73:
ranked by the largest 1,000, 2,500 or 3,000, for a 17 year period before the book's 2005 publication. Smaller companies, $ 50 million or under, were avoided because they tend to have fewer shares in circulation and large purchases can cause sharp changes in share prices. Greenblatt did not test this hypothesis on international stock markets due to difficulties comparing international and
American data, but believed it would apply globally. He also stressed the formula will not necessarily be successful with any specific stock, but will be successful for a group of stocks as a unit or block.
91:) for an average of five months out of each year. On an annual basis, the formula outperformed the market three out of four years but underperformed about 16% of two-year periods and 5% of three-year periods. Greenblatt asserts the formula out-performed market averages 100% of the time for any period longer than three years and worked best over three to five years or more. Results were even better and with lower risk when the formula was applied to larger pools of stocks like the largest 3,000 companies. The formula can thus be a
80:"...a company that ranked 232nd best in return on capital and 153rd best in earnings yield would receive combined ranking of 385 (232 + 153). Getting excellent rankings in both categories, (though not the top ranked in either) would be better under this ranking system than being the top-ranked in one category with only a pretty good ranking in the other."
268:
found that the magic formula generates risk-adjusted excess returns. Over the sample period (2003-2022) the strategy had a CAGR of 21.56%. However, these returns may not be achievable in real-world conditions due to the impact of transaction costs. The study also found that the magic formula could be
206:
from 1998 to 2008 found
Greenblatt's formula led to outperformance of market averages. However, the authors advised the formula was best used as a screening tool and should not be applied dogmatically, as the outperformance associated with Greenblatt's formula might be accounted for by data outlined
260:
analysis of
Greenblatt's magic investing formula for the US market, published June 2020. His analysis revealed that from 2003 to 2015 application of Greenblatt's formula to U.S. stocks resulted in an annualized average return of 11.4%. This outperformed the S&P 500's annualized return of 8.7%.
98:
In an afterword to the 2010 edition, Greenblatt admitted three possible flaws to the formula. (1) The formula can underperform for up to several years which many investors will find discouraging. (2) Some amateurs found it cumbersome to track buying and selling times for stocks. (3) Beating the
72:
He wrote the book for a non-technical reader (his teenaged children were the target audience), but an appendix includes more advanced explanations and data for readers with relevant experience or education. Greenblatt's system analyzed the largest companies trading on the
American stock market,
245:
found application of the
Greenblatt formula resulted in long-term outperformance of market averages in the periods 2005 to 2015, and 2007 to 2017. The authors also found the "magic formula" was also associated with short-term underperformance in some periods, and significantly increased
197:
A number of studies have found merit in
Greenblatt's "magic investing formula" in various markets around the world. However, the studies have also often noted increased volatility, short-term underperformance and other potential risks.
272:
The strategy also outperforms the Indian stock market over the period July 2012 - Feb 2020, according to a 2022 paper. Over this period the average return was 13.9% of 30-stock Magic
Formula portfolio versus 9.3% for the BSE
222:
found the magic formula "yields higher risk-adjusted returns on average". The authors also proposed that a modified form of
Greenblatt's strategy, additionally emphasizing companies with better than average
285:
An empirical study of the French stock market for the period 1999-2019 shows that Joel
Greenblatt's formula was able to beating the market by 5%-9% per year using various quality definitions.
99:
market does not necessarily imply making money (e.g. if the market loses 40% one year, following the formula might result in a 38% loss, which Greenblatt describes as "small consolation".)
349:
Davyclov, D., Tikkanen, J. & Äijö, J., 2016. Magic Formula vs. Traditional Value Investment Strategies in the Finnish Stock Market. Nordic Journal of Business, 65(3–4), pp. 38–54.
84:
From here, Greenblatt recommends selecting 20 to 30 of the better-ranked companies, selling them at predetermined intervals and replacing with new stocks that fit the formula.
238:'s stock market, but cautioned "we could not assure with a high level of certainty that the strategy is alpha generator, and that our results were not due to randomness."
282:
from 2001 to 2014 found Greenblatt's formula was associated with long-term outperformance of market averages by 6-15% depending on company size and other variables.
38:
Greenblatt (b. 1957), an American professional asset manager since the 1980s, suggests purchasing 30 "good companies": cheap stocks with a high
409:
212:
153:
138:
375:
Magic Formula Investing and The Swedish Stock Market: Can the Magic Formula beat the market?] Bachelor’s thesis, Fall Semester 2017,
66:
447:
372:
95:
strategy, focused sometimes on staying committed to stocks that might be temporarily unattractive or with sub-par performance.
295:
87:
Greenblatt's analysis found when applied to the largest 1,000 stocks the formula underperformed the market (defined as the
539:
208:
127:
493:
529:
475:
249:
In 2018, a paper presented at a professional conference found validation for the Greenblatt formula in the
76:
He goes on to assigning numerical rankings, based on each company's earnings yield and return on capital:
524:
279:
534:
433:
168:
109:
178:
Invest in 20–30 highest ranked companies, accumulating 2–3 positions per month over a 12-month period.
250:
185:
once per year, selling losers one week before the year-mark and winners one week after the year mark.
92:
389:
182:
415:
55:
61:
He touts the success of his magic formula in his book 'The Little Book that Beats the Market' (
461:
405:
373:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=8932178&fileOId=8932179
305:
274:
149:
62:
43:
397:
203:
142:
462:"Back Testing Magic Formula on Indian Stock Markets: An Analysis of Magic Formula Strategy"
376:
300:
161:
27:
23:
224:
134:
116:
51:
47:
39:
518:
419:
69:
published 2005, revised 2010), stating it averaged a 17-year annual return of 30.8%.
228:
157:
396:. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 877. pp. 177–194.
390:"Case Study of Magic Formula Based on Value Investment in Chinese A-shares Market"
401:
337:
172:
88:
120:
359:
324:
257:
46:. He describes this as a simplified version of the strategy employed by
509:
434:"A critical look at Greenblatt's Magic Formula · Reasonable Deviations"
219:
265:
242:
235:
494:"L'histoire vous le dira : étude de la stratégie Value-Quality"
234:
A 2016 study found possible confirmation of Greenblatt's formula in
171:
by highest earnings yield and highest return on capital (ranked as
360:
Backtesting the Magic Formula in the Brazilian Stock Market
269:
improved by using operating cash flows instead of EBIT.
338:
Back testing “The Magic Formula” in the Nordic region
256:
Independent scholar Robert Andrew Martin conducted a
394:Advances in Computational Science and Computing
188:Continue over a long-term (5–10+ year) period.
8:
446:Vestre, Tobias & Wikheim, Viktor, 2022.
340:. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics.
362:. Masters Thesis, University of Gothenburg
358:Gunnar Juliao de Paula, Alexander (2016)
316:
22:is an investment technique outlined by
371:Oscar Gustavsson and Oskar Strömberg.
336:Persson, V. & Selander, N., 2009.
218:A 2016 study from the stock market in
202:A 2009 study of stock markets in the
7:
450:. The Norwegian School of Economics.
264:A 2022 study of the stock market in
112:(usually greater than $ 50 million).
492:Thibault Le Flanchec, Le Flanchec.
325:"Joel Greenblatt Speaking at NYSSA"
241:A 2017 study from the markets in
14:
167:Rank all companies above chosen
323:Zen, Brian and Hamai, Garrett.
296:Conservative Formula Investing
213:Fama–French three-factor model
1:
402:10.1007/978-3-030-02116-0_22
128:American Depositary Receipts
26:that uses the principles of
209:capital asset pricing model
126:Exclude foreign companies (
556:
193:Analysis around the world
20:Magic formula investing
16:An investment technique
460:Preet, Simmar (2022).
280:Hong Kong stock market
227:, was best suited to
169:market capitalization
110:market capitalization
327:. December 28, 2005.
251:Chinese stock market
148:Determine company's
133:Determine company's
108:Establish a minimum
93:contrarian investing
540:Valuation (finance)
278:An analysis of the
476:"Home - ValueWalk"
56:Berkshire Hathaway
448:The Magic Formula
411:978-3-030-02115-3
388:Luo, Min (2019).
306:Piotroski F-score
150:return on capital
44:return on capital
547:
530:Personal finance
510:Official website
498:
497:
489:
483:
482:
480:
472:
466:
465:
457:
451:
444:
438:
437:
430:
424:
423:
385:
379:
369:
363:
356:
350:
347:
341:
334:
328:
321:
204:Nordic countries
143:enterprise value
555:
554:
550:
549:
548:
546:
545:
544:
515:
514:
506:
501:
491:
490:
486:
478:
474:
473:
469:
459:
458:
454:
445:
441:
432:
431:
427:
412:
387:
386:
382:
377:Lund University
370:
366:
357:
353:
348:
344:
335:
331:
322:
318:
314:
301:Value Investing
292:
195:
162:working capital
105:
36:
28:value investing
24:Joel Greenblatt
17:
12:
11:
5:
553:
551:
543:
542:
537:
532:
527:
517:
516:
513:
512:
505:
504:External links
502:
500:
499:
484:
467:
452:
439:
425:
410:
380:
364:
351:
342:
329:
315:
313:
310:
309:
308:
303:
298:
291:
288:
287:
286:
283:
276:
270:
262:
254:
247:
239:
232:
225:free cash flow
216:
194:
191:
190:
189:
186:
179:
176:
165:
146:
135:earnings yield
131:
124:
113:
104:
101:
82:
81:
52:Charlie Munger
48:Warren Buffett
40:earnings yield
35:
32:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
552:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
528:
526:
525:Market trends
523:
522:
520:
511:
508:
507:
503:
495:
488:
485:
477:
471:
468:
463:
456:
453:
449:
443:
440:
435:
429:
426:
421:
417:
413:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
384:
381:
378:
374:
368:
365:
361:
355:
352:
346:
343:
339:
333:
330:
326:
320:
317:
311:
307:
304:
302:
299:
297:
294:
293:
289:
284:
281:
277:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
233:
230:
226:
221:
217:
214:
210:
205:
201:
200:
199:
192:
187:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
125:
122:
118:
114:
111:
107:
106:
102:
100:
96:
94:
90:
85:
79:
78:
77:
74:
70:
68:
67:0-471-73306-7
64:
59:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
33:
31:
29:
25:
21:
535:Stock market
487:
470:
455:
442:
428:
393:
383:
367:
354:
345:
332:
319:
229:bull markets
196:
158:fixed assets
97:
86:
83:
75:
71:
60:
37:
19:
18:
246:volatility.
181:Re-balance
173:percentages
89:S&P 500
42:and a high
34:Methodology
519:Categories
312:References
420:158778392
183:portfolio
121:financial
290:See also
258:backtest
211:and the
115:Exclude
273:Sensex.
220:Finland
207:in the
156:/ (net
123:stocks.
117:utility
103:Formula
418:
408:
266:Norway
243:Sweden
236:Brazil
65:
479:(PDF)
416:S2CID
406:ISBN
154:EBIT
139:EBIT
119:and
63:ISBN
50:and
398:doi
54:of
521::
414:.
404:.
392:.
175:).
164:).
160:+
152:=
141:/
137:=
130:).
58:.
30:.
496:.
481:.
464:.
436:.
422:.
400::
253:.
231:.
215:.
145:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.