Knowledge (XXG)

Maryland v. Wilson

Source 📝

31: 258:
applies to passengers due to similar public safety concerns. Although it was acknowledged that passengers present less risk in terms of traffic accidents, more people in a vehicle increases risk to the officer in the event of violence. Furthermore, even though there appears to be less probable cause
230:
Hughes observed two passengers turning to look at him, ducking down, and reappearing. As he approached the car, the driver got out and gave him a valid Connecticut driver's license. Hughes noticed Wilson, the front seat passenger, acting nervous and sweating. He then ordered Wilson out of the car
284:
complemented Steven's dissent by opining under the American justice system, an officer needs to relay a satisfactory explanation under rational judgement of the circumstances during a seizure (even in situations where officer safety is at risk). He also postulates that a seizure of a passenger
276:
itself rested on the probable cause to detain a driver. Finally, Stevens believes that as long as there is no reasonable suspicion against them, a passenger should be able to decide whether to stay in a vehicle instead of having to risk exposure to bad weather or prying eyes.
271:
wrote a dissent that Justice Kennedy joined. He argued that the majority decision relied on scant evidence and misleading statistics to justify the intrusion of a potentially innocent person's liberty. Additionally, the spirit of
411: 231:
while the driver was looking for the car's rental papers. As Wilson got out, a quantity of crack cocaine dropped on the ground. Hughes finally arrested Wilson for cocaine possession.
345: 72: 191: 321: 401: 223:
David Hughes observed a car speeding at 64 miles per hour in a 55 miles per hour zone. Instead of a license plate, the car had a torn piece of paper from
416: 406: 205: 35: 317: 313: 259:
behind ordering a passenger out than a driver, the only major change in circumstances is the person being outside the car.
235: 285:
during a traffic stop is not a trivial matter as the average traffic stop can take upward of at least half an hour.
208:. The Court ruled that officers could order out passengers for any reason during a traffic stop, extending 120: 349: 224: 220: 209: 86: 64: 148: 365: 356: 251: 112: 104: 234:
During Wilson's trial, the Circuit Court of Baltimore County suppressed the crack cocaine as
325: 281: 268: 144: 132: 227:
hanging from the rear. The car did not stop for Hughes' lights and sirens for 1.5 miles.
374: 301: 156: 124: 395: 136: 67: 383: 173:
Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter
30: 238:. The appellate courts upheld the suppression, ruling that 412:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
254:
delivered the majority opinion. The Court ruled that
185: 177: 169: 164: 93: 80: 59: 49: 42: 23: 314:Maryland v. Wilson: The Fading Fourth Amendment 204:, 519 U.S. 408 (1997), was a decision by the 8: 20: 402:United States Fourth Amendment case law 302:Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997) 294: 89:applies to the passengers of vehicles 54:State of Maryland v. Jerry Lee Wilson 18:1997 United States Supreme Court case 7: 206:Supreme Court of the United States 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 352:408 (1997) is available from: 29: 320:. 1998 Vol. 49 (3). Article 12 417:1997 in United States case law 242:does not apply to passengers. 1: 236:fruit of the poisonous tree 433: 384:Oyez (oral argument audio) 407:Legal history of Maryland 190: 98: 85: 45:Decided February 19, 1997 28: 43:Argued December 11, 1996 221:Maryland State Trooper 324:July 8, 2024, at the 225:Enterprise Rent-a-Car 210:Pennsylvania v. Mimms 192:U.S. Const. Amend. IV 87:Pennsylvania v. Mimms 316:Gregory Lineberry. 149:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 121:Sandra Day O'Connor 342:Maryland v. Wilson 201:Maryland v. Wilson 109:Associate Justices 24:Maryland v. Wilson 318:Mercer Law Review 252:William Rehnquist 197: 196: 105:William Rehnquist 424: 388: 382: 379: 373: 370: 364: 361: 355: 328: 311: 305: 299: 181:Stevens, Kennedy 94:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 432: 431: 427: 426: 425: 423: 422: 421: 392: 391: 386: 380: 377: 371: 368: 362: 359: 353: 337: 332: 331: 326:Wayback Machine 312: 308: 300: 296: 291: 282:Anthony Kennedy 269:John P. Stevens 265: 248: 218: 147: 145:Clarence Thomas 135: 133:Anthony Kennedy 123: 113:John P. Stevens 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 430: 428: 420: 419: 414: 409: 404: 394: 393: 390: 389: 336: 335:External links 333: 330: 329: 306: 293: 292: 290: 287: 264: 261: 250:Chief Justice 247: 244: 217: 214: 195: 194: 188: 187: 183: 182: 179: 175: 174: 171: 167: 166: 162: 161: 160: 159: 157:Stephen Breyer 125:Antonin Scalia 110: 107: 102: 96: 95: 91: 90: 83: 82: 78: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 429: 418: 415: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 399: 397: 385: 376: 367: 358: 357:CourtListener 351: 347: 343: 339: 338: 334: 327: 323: 319: 315: 310: 307: 303: 298: 295: 288: 286: 283: 278: 275: 270: 262: 260: 257: 253: 245: 243: 241: 237: 232: 228: 226: 222: 215: 213: 211: 207: 203: 202: 193: 189: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165:Case opinions 163: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 111: 108: 106: 103: 101:Chief Justice 100: 99: 97: 92: 88: 84: 79: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 341: 309: 297: 279: 273: 266: 255: 249: 239: 233: 229: 219: 200: 199: 198: 186:Laws applied 152: 140: 137:David Souter 128: 116: 71: 53: 15: 396:Categories 289:References 216:Background 60:Citations 340:Text of 322:Archived 280:Justice 267:Justice 246:Decision 170:Majority 366:Findlaw 304:Justia 263:Dissent 178:Dissent 81:Holding 387:  381:  378:  375:Justia 372:  369:  363:  360:  354:  155: 153:· 151:  143: 141:· 139:  131: 129:· 127:  119: 117:· 115:  348: 274:Mimms 256:Mimms 240:Mimms 350:U.S. 73:more 65:U.S. 63:519 346:519 68:408 398:: 344:, 212:. 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
408
more
Pennsylvania v. Mimms
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
U.S. Const. Amend. IV
Supreme Court of the United States
Pennsylvania v. Mimms
Maryland State Trooper
Enterprise Rent-a-Car
fruit of the poisonous tree
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Anthony Kennedy
Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997)
Maryland v. Wilson: The Fading Fourth Amendment
Mercer Law Review
Archived
Wayback Machine
519
U.S.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.