141:
22:
270:.) However, because (1) the Constitution of Trinidad and Tobago disallows itself to act to invalidate laws that existed prior to the enactment of the constitution, and (2) the law in question pre-dated the constitution, the mandatory death provisions of the law could not be invalidated and must be upheld.
335:
340:
248:
The JCPC held in some cases, the law that makes capital punishment mandatory for murder will violate the prohibition on "inhuman or degrading punishment" in the
350:
320:
234:
154:
345:
325:
113:
293:, which interpreted the Constitution of Trinidad and Tobago as invalidating the law on mandatory capital punishment for murder.
330:
47:
198:
140:
94:
249:
66:
43:
32:
73:
51:
36:
80:
62:
242:
289:
279:, which was released on the same day, the JCPC applied the same principles to a similar law in
87:
314:
302:
210:
182:
237:(JCPC) case which upheld the law that sets out a mandatory sentence of death for
336:
Judicial
Committee of the Privy Council cases on appeal from Trinidad and Tobago
21:
254:
287:
overruled and declared as wrongly decided the
November 2003 JCPC decision of
275:
266:
280:
260:
238:
15:
252:. (This principle is consistent with the 2002 JCPC cases of
341:
Prisoners sentenced to death by
Trinidad and Tobago
222:
Capital punishment; inhuman or degrading punishment
216:
204:
194:
189:
178:
170:
165:Charles Matthew, Appellant v The State, Respondent
160:
150:
145:
Arms of the
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
133:
8:
126:Judicial Committee of the Privy Council case
50:. Unsourced material may be challenged and
139:
130:
114:Learn how and when to remove this message
235:Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
155:Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
199:Court of Appeal of Trinidad and Tobago
7:
48:adding citations to reliable sources
351:Human rights in Trinidad and Tobago
250:Constitution of Trinidad and Tobago
14:
20:
321:2004 in United Kingdom case law
1:
346:Murder in Trinidad and Tobago
326:2004 in Trinidad and Tobago
367:
221:
209:
138:
185:, 1 AC 433, 3 WLR 812
331:Death penalty case law
44:improve this article
243:Trinidad and Tobago
226:
225:
124:
123:
116:
98:
358:
143:
131:
119:
112:
108:
105:
99:
97:
56:
24:
16:
366:
365:
361:
360:
359:
357:
356:
355:
311:
310:
299:
146:
127:
120:
109:
103:
100:
57:
55:
41:
25:
12:
11:
5:
364:
362:
354:
353:
348:
343:
338:
333:
328:
323:
313:
312:
309:
308:
298:
297:External links
295:
224:
223:
219:
218:
214:
213:
207:
206:
202:
201:
196:
192:
191:
187:
186:
180:
176:
175:
172:
168:
167:
162:
161:Full case name
158:
157:
152:
148:
147:
144:
136:
135:
125:
122:
121:
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
363:
352:
349:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
327:
324:
322:
319:
318:
316:
306:
305:
301:
300:
296:
294:
292:
291:
286:
282:
278:
277:
271:
269:
268:
263:
262:
257:
256:
251:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
220:
215:
212:
208:
205:Case opinions
203:
200:
197:
193:
188:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
153:
149:
142:
137:
132:
129:
118:
115:
107:
96:
93:
89:
86:
82:
79:
75:
72:
68:
65: –
64:
63:"Matthew v S"
60:
59:Find sources:
53:
49:
45:
39:
38:
34:
29:This article
27:
23:
18:
17:
307:, bailii.org
303:
288:
284:
274:
272:
265:
259:
253:
247:
229:
228:
227:
211:Lord Hoffman
195:Prior action
190:Case history
164:
128:
110:
101:
91:
84:
77:
70:
58:
42:Please help
30:
304:Matthew v S
230:Matthew v S
174:7 July 2004
134:Matthew v S
315:Categories
290:Roodal v S
233:is a 2004
74:newspapers
276:Boyce v R
179:Citations
104:June 2022
31:does not
281:Barbados
217:Keywords
285:Matthew
183:UKPC 33
171:Decided
88:scholar
52:removed
37:sources
264:, and
255:Hughes
239:murder
90:
83:
76:
69:
61:
267:Reyes
151:Court
95:JSTOR
81:books
67:news
35:any
33:cite
273:In
261:Fox
241:in
46:by
317::
283:.
258:,
245:.
117:)
111:(
106:)
102:(
92:·
85:·
78:·
71:·
54:.
40:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
