Knowledge (XXG)

Minerals Separation, Limited

Source 📝

44:
States. Minerals Separation, Limited obtained U.S. Patent No. 835,120, issued on November 6, 1906, to Henry Livingston Sulman, Hugh Fitzalis Kirkpatrick-Picard (the two prominent consultant metallurgists and directors of the firm) and John Ballot. As stated in the specification of the patent, the claimed discovery related "to improvements in the process for the concentration of ores, the object being to separate metalliferous matter from gangue by means of oils, fatty acids, or other substances which have a preferential affinity for such metalliferous matter over gangue." Between 1910 and 1912, Minerals Separation Limited acquired use of the process of
52:. In 1914, they also acquired the important Bradford patent for differential flotation. And in 1923, Minerals Separation staff chemists in the San Francisco office, Cornelius Keller and Carl Lewis under director Edward H. Nutter, perfected the use of chemical xanthates, replacing the use of oil and easing the workings in the froth cells. The firm moved into research for the use of flotation in nonmetals as well, such as potash. 60:. It was also well known that this selective property of oils and oily substances was increased when applied to some ores by the addition of a small amount of acid to the ore and water used in process of concentration. Authors of early books on the flotation process related tales of froth flotation roots back to the writings of Herodotus, and listed a series of "flotation" patents back to the mid-nineteenth century. 64:
critical and minute compared with the amount used in prior processes, amounting to a fraction of 1 percent on the ore and in impregnating with air the mass of ore and water by agitation. Xanthates all but eliminated the need for the oils and instigated another round of lawsuits in the 1920s, which Minerals Separation again won.
70:
Minerals Separation, Ltd, organized subsidiaries. In 1911, the company opened an office in San Francisco under Edward Nutter, which eventually incorporated as the Minerals Separation North American Corporation. During World War I, John Ballot relocated to the United States, as president of the firm
43:
Its most important patent was the discovery that a small percentage of oil, agitated into a froth, was needed to make the process commercially successful at Broken Hill. The patent was received for this process in Britain in 1905 and then the next year around the world but especially in the United
35:
mill tailings. By the 1910s, the firm's Australian process was generally accepted as so great an advance over any process known before that it promptly came into extensive use for the concentration of ores in most of the principal mining countries of the world. It largely replaced all earlier ore
75:
companies (Utah Copper, Nevada Con, Ray Con, Chino, Butte & Superior and others), which netted $ 5,000,000 in back license fees. With the expiration of the patents, and the royalties received for licensing, the Minerals Separation NA went out of the flotation research and patent business and
63:
Because of the many claims of primacy, the Minerals Separation Lt history is one of constant litigation over its patents, with the British House of Lords and the U. S. Supreme Court (twice) deciding in its favor. The process of the patent in suit consisted in the use of an amount of oil which is
55:
Prior to these discoveries, it was well known that oil and oily substances had a selective affinity or attraction for, and would unite mechanically with, the minute particles of metal and metallic compounds found in crushed or powdered ores, but would not so unite with the quartz, or rocky
229: 27:
Organized in 1903 by South African John Ballot, the firm moved to experiment with new processes as well as acquire patents of others until they had perfected a
155: 115: 67:
These court victories "earned for itself (Minerals Separation, Ltd) the cordial detestation of many in the mining world."
224: 32: 71:
with headquarters in New York. He died a few months before the 1922 final settlement of a suit with the
185: 72: 151: 111: 175:. New York, New York: American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers. p. 453. 49: 37: 28: 19:, was a small London-based company involved in developing a technique of ore extraction. 218: 200: 85: 45: 108:
The Role of Minerals Separation Ltd. in the Development of the Flotation Process
57: 110:. Victoria, Australia: Zlota Press. pp. passim. 201:"MINERALS SEPARATION v. HYDE , 242 U.S. 261 (1916)" 188:. Australian Science and Technology Heritage Centre 135:. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1–7. 230:Defunct mining companies of the United Kingdom 8: 150:. London: Reaktion Books Ltd. p. 208. 36:extraction processes and is today known as 186:"Historical Note: Minerals Separation Ltd" 98: 203:. FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business 88:, engaged in patent infringement suit 7: 14: 31:process. This was perfected on 56:non-metallic material, called 1: 50:De Bavay's Sulphide Process 246: 76:dissolved in the 1950s. 171:Parsons, A. B. (1933). 148:Mining in World History 106:Birrell, Ralph (2000). 17:Minerals Separation Ltd 146:Lynch, Martin (2002). 131:Gaudin, A. M. (1932). 33:Broken Hill, Australia 173:The Porphyry Coppers 73:Daniel C. Jackling 225:History of mining 237: 211: 209: 208: 196: 194: 193: 177: 176: 168: 162: 161: 143: 137: 136: 128: 122: 121: 103: 245: 244: 240: 239: 238: 236: 235: 234: 215: 214: 206: 204: 199: 191: 189: 184: 181: 180: 170: 169: 165: 158: 145: 144: 140: 130: 129: 125: 118: 105: 104: 100: 95: 82: 38:froth flotation 29:froth flotation 25: 12: 11: 5: 243: 241: 233: 232: 227: 217: 216: 213: 212: 197: 179: 178: 163: 156: 138: 123: 116: 97: 96: 94: 91: 90: 89: 81: 78: 24: 21: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 242: 231: 228: 226: 223: 222: 220: 202: 198: 187: 183: 182: 174: 167: 164: 159: 157:9781861891730 153: 149: 142: 139: 134: 127: 124: 119: 113: 109: 102: 99: 92: 87: 86:James M. Hyde 84: 83: 79: 77: 74: 68: 65: 61: 59: 53: 51: 47: 41: 39: 34: 30: 22: 20: 18: 205:. Retrieved 190:. Retrieved 172: 166: 147: 141: 132: 126: 107: 101: 69: 66: 62: 54: 46:ore dressing 42: 26: 16: 15: 219:Categories 207:2009-08-21 192:2009-08-21 117:0958587469 93:References 133:Flotation 48:known as 80:See also 23:History 154:  114:  58:gangue 152:ISBN 112:ISBN 221:: 40:. 210:. 195:. 160:. 120:.

Index

froth flotation
Broken Hill, Australia
froth flotation
ore dressing
De Bavay's Sulphide Process
gangue
Daniel C. Jackling
James M. Hyde
ISBN
0958587469
ISBN
9781861891730
"Historical Note: Minerals Separation Ltd"
"MINERALS SEPARATION v. HYDE , 242 U.S. 261 (1916)"
Categories
History of mining
Defunct mining companies of the United Kingdom

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.