Knowledge (XXG)

Regret (decision theory)

Source 📝

167:
For example, when faced with a choice between $ 40 with certainty and a coin toss that pays $ 100 if the outcome is guessed correctly and $ 0 otherwise, not only does the certain payment alternative minimizes the risk but also the possibility of regret, since typically the coin will not be tossed (and thus the uncertainty not resolved) while if the coin toss is chosen, the outcome that pays $ 0 will induce regret. If the coin is tossed regardless of the chosen alternative, then the alternative payoff will always be known and then there is no choice that will eliminate the possibility of regret.
176:
experience greater regret if they missed a train by 1 minute more than missing a train by 5 minutes, for example, but commuters who actually missed their train by 1 or 5 minutes experienced (equal and) lower amounts of regret. Commuters appeared to overestimate the regret they would feel when missing the train by a narrow margin, because they tended to underestimate the extent to which they would attribute missing the train to external causes (e.g., missing their wallet or spending less time in the shower).
163:
been able to make a profit and how much could it have been (a participant that has a valuation of $ 50, bids $ 30 and finds out the winning bid was $ 35 will also learn that he or she could have earned as much as $ 15 by bidding anything over $ 35.) This in turn allows for the possibility of regret and if bidders correctly anticipate this, they would tend to bid higher than in the case where no feedback on the winning bid is provided in order to decrease the possibility of regret.
147:
failure or omitting an opportunity that we seek to avoid. Regret, feeling sadness or disappointment over something that has happened, can be rationalized for a certain decision, but can guide preferences and can lead people astray. This contributes to the spread of disinformation because things are not seen as one's personal responsibility.
204:
in 1951. The aim of this is to perform as closely as possible to the optimal course. Since the minimax criterion applied here is to the regret (difference or ratio of the payoffs) rather than to the payoff itself, it is not as pessimistic as the ordinary minimax approach. Similar approaches have been
162:
show that by manipulating the feedback the participants expect to receive, significant differences in the average bids are observed. In particular, "Loser's regret" can be induced by revealing the winning bid to all participants in the auction, and thus revealing to the losers whether they would have
359:
choice based on returns would be to invest in the money market, ensuring a return of at least 1. However, if interest rates fell then the regret associated with this choice would be large. This would be 11, which is the difference between the 12 which could have been received if the outcome had been
166:
In decisions over lotteries, experiments also provide supporting evidence of anticipated regret. As in the case of first price auctions, differences in feedback over the resolution of the uncertainty can cause the possibility of regret and if this is anticipated, it may induce different preferences.
446:
Therefore, using a minimax choice based on regret, the best course would be to invest in bonds, ensuring a regret of no worse than 5. A mixed investment portfolio would do even better: 61.1% invested in stocks, and 38.9% in the money market would produce a regret no worse than about 4.28.
175:
Anticipated regret tends to be overestimated for both choices and actions over which people perceive themselves to be responsible. People are particularly likely to overestimate the regret they will feel when missing a desired outcome by a narrow margin. In one study, commuters predicted they would
146:
Regret aversion is not only a theoretical economics model, but a cognitive bias occurring as a decision has been made to abstain from regretting an alternative decision. To better preface, regret aversion can be seen through fear by either commission or omission; the prospect of committing to a
122:
which depends negatively on the realized outcome and positively on the best alternative outcome given the uncertainty resolution. This regret term is usually an increasing, continuous and non-negative function subtracted to the traditional utility index. These type of preferences always violate
2450:, whose payoffs depend on a state of nature known only by the Agent. The Principal commits to a policy, then the agent responds, and then the state of nature is revealed. They assume that the principal and agent interact repeatedly, and may learn over time from the state history, using 566:. Also, since the estimator is restricted to be linear, the zero MSE cannot be achieved in the latter case. In this case, the solution of a convex optimization problem gives the optimal, minimax regret-minimizing linear estimator, which can be seen by the following argument. 225:
One benefit of minimax (as opposed to expected regret) is that it is independent of the probabilities of the various outcomes: thus if regret can be accurately computed, one can reliably use minimax regret. However, probabilities of outcomes are hard to estimate.
2319: 1510: 130:
For independent lotteries and when regret is evaluated over the difference between utilities and then averaged over the all combinations of outcomes, the regret can still be transitive but for only specific form of regret functional. It is shown that only
1087: 1112:
it cannot be minimized directly. Instead, the concept of regret can be used in order to define a linear estimator with good MSE performance. To define the regret here, consider a linear estimator that knows the value of the parameter
360:
known in advance and the 1 received. A mixed portfolio of about 11.1% in stocks and 88.9% in the money market would have ensured a return of at least 2.22; but, if interest rates fell, there would be a regret of about 9.78.
1855: 2825: 2794: 2033: 249:
Suppose an investor has to choose between investing in stocks, bonds or the money market, and the total return depends on what happens to interest rates. The following table shows some possible returns:
1711: 2084: 1278: 184:
Besides the traditional setting of choices over lotteries, regret aversion has been proposed as an explanation for the typically observed overbidding in first price auctions, and the
2376: 1231: 1270: 808: 897: 694: 1920: 1575: 645: 905: 764: 1887: 1542: 2420: 2396: 2076: 2056: 1595: 1171: 1151: 1131: 1110: 871: 851: 831: 737: 717: 668: 607: 587: 564: 544: 524: 497: 477: 115:. Regret theory models choice under uncertainty taking into account the effect of anticipated regret. Subsequently, several other authors improved upon it. 2893:
Gilbert, Daniel T.; Morewedge, Carey K.; Risen, Jane L.; Wilson, Timothy D. (2004-05-01). "Looking Forward to Looking Backward The Misprediction of Regret".
2465:
Collina, Roth and Shao improve their mechanism both in running-time and in the bounds for regret (as a function of the number of distinct states of nature).
1725: 135:
function will maintain this property. This form of regret inherits most of desired features, such as holding right preferences in face of first order
3042:
Fogel, S. O. C.; Berry, T. (2006). "The disposition effect and individual investor decisions: the roles of regret and counterfactual alternatives".
3104:
Eldar, Y. C.; Ben-Tal, A.; Nemirovski, A. (2004). "Linear Minimax regret estimation of deterministic parameters with bounded data uncertainties".
2058:. In practice this MSE cannot be achieved, but it serves as a bound on the optimal MSE. The regret of using the linear estimator specified by 3264: 1928: 2701: 526:
centered at zero. The regret is defined to be the difference between the MSE of the linear estimator that doesn't know the parameter
2600: 3313: 1603: 2378:
This will allow a performance as close as possible to the best achievable performance in the worst case of the parameter
52:
is often experienced, and can be measured as the value of difference between a made decision and the optimal decision.
2435: 2314:{\displaystyle R(x,G)=MSE-MSE^{o}=Tr(GC_{w}G^{*})+x^{*}(I-GH)^{*}(I-GH)x-{\frac {x^{*}x}{1+x^{*}H^{*}C_{w}^{-1}Hx}}.} 3339: 2621: 1505:{\displaystyle MSE^{o}=E\left(||{\hat {x}}^{o}-x||^{2}\right)=Tr(G(x)C_{w}G(x)^{*})+x^{*}(I-G(x)H)^{*}(I-G(x)H)x.} 3334: 356: 108: 3344: 3147:
Eldar, Y. C.; Merhav, Neri (2004). "A Competitive Minimax Approach to Robust Estimation of Random Parameters".
2758: 2489: 363:
The regret table for this example, constructed by subtracting actual returns from best returns, is as follows:
67:
regret and thus incorporate in their choice their desire to eliminate or reduce this possibility. Regret is a
2529:
Loomes, G.; Sugden, R. (1982). "Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty".
2509: 459:. In this example, the problem is to construct a linear estimator of a finite-dimensional parameter vector 155:
Several experiments over both incentivized and hypothetical choices attest to the magnitude of this effect.
2327: 1179: 2902: 2451: 2439: 1717: 3288:
Collina, Natalie; Roth, Aaron; Shao, Han (2023). "Efficient Prior-Free Mechanisms for No-Regret Agents".
3190:
Eldar, Y. C.; Merhav, Neri (2005). "Minimax MSE-Ratio Estimation with Signal Covariance Uncertainties".
2474: 100: 479:
from its noisy linear measurement with known noise covariance structure. The loss of reconstruction of
3199: 3156: 3113: 2402:
and in particular a numerical solution can be efficiently calculated. Similar ideas can be used when
136: 68: 2907: 1239: 2826:"Consequences of regret aversion 2: Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making" 2399: 775: 238: 159: 124: 2699:
Bardakhchyan, V.; Allahverdyan, A. (2023). "Regret theory, Allais' paradox, and Savage's omelet".
2454:. They assume that the agent is driven by regret-aversion. In particular, the agent minimizes his 3289: 3270: 3242: 3215: 3172: 3129: 3059: 2987: 2936: 2872: 2775: 2756:
Filiz-Ozbay, E.; Ozbay, E. Y. (2007). "Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment".
2710: 2638: 2546: 2479: 500: 209: 185: 876: 673: 3260: 2979: 2971: 2928: 2920: 2596: 2423: 1082:{\displaystyle MSE=E\left(||{\hat {x}}-x||^{2}\right)=Tr(GC_{w}G^{*})+x^{*}(I-GH)^{*}(I-GH)x.} 112: 1892: 1547: 75:
component, and is central to how humans learn from experience and to the human psychology of
3252: 3207: 3164: 3121: 3086: 3051: 3022: 3014: 2963: 2912: 2864: 2837: 2806: 2767: 2720: 2679: 2669: 2630: 2573: 2538: 2459: 697: 615: 455:
What follows is an illustration of how the concept of regret can be used to design a linear
119: 2954:
Sevdalis, Nick; Harvey, Nigel (2007-08-01). "Biased Forecasting of Postdecisional Affect".
742: 2484: 1863: 1518: 132: 31: 3203: 3160: 3117: 2795:"Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making" 3317: 3005:
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. (1989). "The effect of regret on optimal bidding in auctions".
2405: 2381: 2061: 2041: 1580: 1156: 1136: 1116: 1095: 856: 836: 816: 722: 702: 653: 592: 572: 549: 529: 509: 482: 462: 201: 140: 84: 3328: 3274: 3063: 2967: 2916: 2876: 2494: 104: 76: 3219: 3176: 3133: 2779: 2738: 2642: 3090: 2991: 3234: 2940: 3256: 3055: 2504: 1850:{\displaystyle G(x)={\frac {1}{1+x^{*}H^{*}C_{w}^{-1}Hx}}xx^{*}H^{*}C_{w}^{-1}.} 88: 39: 237:
between outcomes, and thus requires interval or ratio measurements, as well as
2868: 2724: 2634: 2324:
The minimax regret approach here is to minimize the worst-case regret, i.e.,
214: 200:
regret approach is to minimize the worst-case regret, originally presented by
72: 17: 2975: 2924: 3211: 3168: 3125: 504: 456: 219: 27:
Measure of value difference between best possible decision and made decision
2983: 2932: 2855:
Somasundaram, J.; Diecidue, E. (2016). "Regret theory and risk attitudes".
2841: 2810: 3018: 2771: 2619:
Diecidue, E.; Somasundaram, J. (2017). "Regret Theory: A New Foundation".
2577: 3239:
2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)
80: 2793:
Zeelenberg, M.; Beattie, J.; Van der Pligt, J.; de Vries, N. K. (1996).
2684: 2550: 2499: 197: 139:, risk averseness for logarithmic utilities and the ability to explain 3027: 2038:
This is the smallest MSE achievable with a linear estimate that knows
83:
that transcends regret from the emotional realm—often modeled as mere
48: 35: 3233:
Camara, Modibo K.; Hartline, Jason D.; Johnsen, Aleck (2020-11-01).
2542: 3294: 3247: 2715: 2564:
Bell, D. E. (1982). "Regret in decision making under uncertainty".
2028:{\displaystyle MSE^{o}={\frac {x^{*}x}{1+x^{*}H^{*}C_{w}^{-1}Hx}}.} 2674: 2657: 127:
in the traditional sense, although most satisfy a weaker version.
2398:. Although this problem appears difficult, it is an instance of 229:
This differs from the standard minimax approach in that it uses
3077:
Savage, L. J. (1951). "The Theory of Statistical Decision".
739:
is a zero mean random vector with a known covariance matrix
3235:"Mechanisms for a No-Regret Agent: Beyond the Common Prior" 42:—should information about the best course of action arrive 1706:{\displaystyle G(x)=xx^{*}H^{*}(C_{w}+Hxx^{*}H^{*})^{-1}.} 503:(MSE). The unknown parameter vector is known to lie in an 2739:"Why do we anticipate regret before we make a decision?" 63:
proposes that when facing a decision, individuals might
46:
taking a fixed decision—the human emotional response of
2408: 2384: 2330: 2087: 2064: 2044: 1931: 1895: 1866: 1728: 1606: 1583: 1550: 1521: 1281: 1242: 1182: 1159: 1139: 1119: 1098: 908: 879: 859: 839: 819: 778: 745: 725: 705: 676: 656: 618: 595: 575: 552: 532: 512: 485: 465: 2830:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
2799:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
91:
choice behavior that is modeled in decision theory.
2614: 2612: 2414: 2390: 2370: 2313: 2070: 2050: 2027: 1914: 1881: 1849: 1705: 1589: 1569: 1536: 1504: 1264: 1225: 1165: 1145: 1125: 1104: 1081: 891: 865: 845: 825: 802: 758: 731: 711: 688: 662: 639: 601: 581: 569:According to the assumptions, the observed vector 558: 538: 518: 491: 471: 546:, and the MSE of the linear estimator that knows 2332: 3079:Journal of the American Statistical Association 589:and the unknown deterministic parameter vector 899:matrix. The MSE of this estimator is given by 79:. Conscious anticipation of regret creates a 8: 171:Anticipated regret versus experienced regret 1597:and the derivative is equated to 0 getting 3293: 3246: 3026: 2906: 2714: 2683: 2673: 2458:. Based on this assumption, they develop 2407: 2383: 2335: 2329: 2290: 2285: 2275: 2265: 2244: 2237: 2207: 2182: 2166: 2156: 2131: 2086: 2063: 2043: 2004: 1999: 1989: 1979: 1958: 1951: 1942: 1930: 1906: 1894: 1865: 1835: 1830: 1820: 1810: 1785: 1780: 1770: 1760: 1744: 1727: 1691: 1681: 1671: 1652: 1639: 1629: 1605: 1582: 1561: 1549: 1520: 1463: 1429: 1413: 1394: 1355: 1350: 1344: 1332: 1321: 1320: 1314: 1309: 1292: 1280: 1256: 1245: 1244: 1241: 1196: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1158: 1138: 1118: 1097: 1049: 1024: 1008: 998: 968: 963: 957: 940: 939: 934: 929: 907: 878: 858: 838: 818: 780: 779: 777: 750: 744: 724: 704: 675: 655: 617: 594: 574: 551: 531: 511: 484: 464: 365: 252: 2521: 2462:that minimize the principal's regret. 2888: 2886: 2371:{\displaystyle \sup _{x\in E}R(x,G).} 1226:{\displaystyle {\hat {x}}^{o}=G(x)y.} 118:It incorporates a regret term in the 7: 2824:Zeelenberg, M.; Beattie, J. (1997). 2656:Bikhchandani, S.; Segal, U. (2011). 1092:Since the MSE depends explicitly on 205:used in a variety of areas such as: 103:simultaneously developed in 1982 by 2593:The Foundations of Expected Utility 2434:Camara, Hartline and Johnsen study 241:(ranking), as in standard minimax. 2702:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2430:Regret in principal-agent problems 2422:is random with uncertainty in the 1577:is differentiated with respect to 451:Example: Linear estimation setting 25: 2595:. Theory & Decision Library. 2968:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01958.x 2917:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00681.x 3314:"TUTORIAL G05: Decision theory" 2857:Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3091:10.1080/01621459.1951.10500768 2456:counterfactual internal regret 2362: 2350: 2228: 2213: 2204: 2188: 2172: 2146: 2103: 2091: 1876: 1870: 1738: 1732: 1688: 1645: 1616: 1610: 1531: 1525: 1493: 1487: 1481: 1469: 1460: 1453: 1447: 1435: 1419: 1410: 1403: 1387: 1381: 1375: 1351: 1345: 1326: 1315: 1310: 1265:{\displaystyle {\hat {x}}^{o}} 1250: 1214: 1208: 1190: 1070: 1055: 1046: 1030: 1014: 988: 964: 958: 945: 935: 930: 785: 1: 3044:Journal of Behavioral Finance 803:{\displaystyle {\hat {x}}=Gy} 609:are tied by the linear model 3257:10.1109/focs46700.2020.00033 2440:incomplete-information games 99:Regret theory is a model in 3056:10.1207/s15427579jpfm0702_5 2442:between two players called 71:with a powerful social and 3361: 3241:. IEEE. pp. 259–270. 3192:IEEE Trans. Signal Process 3149:IEEE Trans. Signal Process 3106:IEEE Trans. Signal Process 2622:Journal of Economic Theory 2869:10.1007/s11166-017-9268-9 2725:10.1016/j.jmp.2023.102807 2635:10.1016/j.jet.2017.08.006 1153:can explicitly depend on 892:{\displaystyle m\times n} 689:{\displaystyle n\times m} 2759:American Economic Review 2591:Fishburn, P. C. (1982). 2490:Info-gap decision theory 2436:principal-agent problems 813:be a linear estimate of 3212:10.1109/TSP.2005.843701 3169:10.1109/TSP.2004.828931 3126:10.1109/TSP.2004.831144 1915:{\displaystyle MSE^{o}} 1570:{\displaystyle MSE^{o}} 87:—into the realm of the 2842:10.1006/obhd.1997.2730 2811:10.1006/obhd.1996.0013 2452:reinforcement learning 2416: 2392: 2372: 2315: 2072: 2052: 2029: 1916: 1883: 1851: 1718:Matrix Inversion Lemma 1707: 1591: 1571: 1538: 1506: 1266: 1227: 1167: 1147: 1127: 1106: 1083: 893: 867: 847: 827: 804: 760: 733: 713: 690: 664: 641: 640:{\displaystyle y=Hx+w} 603: 583: 560: 540: 520: 499:is measured using the 493: 473: 3019:10.1287/mnsc.35.6.685 2956:Psychological Science 2895:Psychological Science 2772:10.1257/aer.97.4.1407 2662:Theoretical Economics 2578:10.1287/opre.30.5.961 2475:Regret-free mechanism 2417: 2393: 2373: 2316: 2073: 2053: 2030: 1917: 1884: 1852: 1708: 1592: 1572: 1539: 1507: 1267: 1228: 1168: 1148: 1128: 1107: 1084: 894: 868: 848: 828: 805: 761: 759:{\displaystyle C_{w}} 734: 714: 691: 665: 642: 604: 584: 561: 541: 521: 494: 474: 111:, David E. Bell, and 101:theoretical economics 2510:Wald's maximin model 2406: 2382: 2328: 2085: 2062: 2042: 1929: 1893: 1882:{\displaystyle G(x)} 1864: 1726: 1604: 1581: 1548: 1537:{\displaystyle G(x)} 1519: 1515:To find the optimal 1279: 1240: 1180: 1157: 1137: 1117: 1096: 906: 877: 857: 837: 817: 776: 743: 723: 703: 674: 654: 616: 593: 573: 550: 530: 510: 483: 463: 239:ordinal measurements 160:first price auctions 137:stochastic dominance 3204:2005ITSP...53.1335E 3161:2004ITSP...52.1931E 3118:2004ITSP...52.2177E 2658:"Transitive Regret" 2566:Operations Research 2400:convex optimization 2298: 2012: 1843: 1793: 1133:, i.e., the matrix 378:Interest rates fall 372:Interest rates rise 265:Interest rates fall 259:Interest rates rise 3007:Management Science 2480:Competitive regret 2412: 2388: 2368: 2346: 2311: 2281: 2068: 2048: 2025: 1995: 1912: 1879: 1860:Substituting this 1847: 1826: 1776: 1703: 1587: 1567: 1534: 1502: 1262: 1223: 1163: 1143: 1123: 1102: 1079: 889: 863: 843: 823: 800: 756: 729: 709: 686: 660: 637: 599: 579: 556: 536: 516: 501:mean-squared error 489: 469: 210:Hypothesis testing 186:disposition effect 61:anticipated regret 3340:Optimal decisions 3266:978-1-7281-9621-3 2424:covariance matrix 2415:{\displaystyle x} 2391:{\displaystyle x} 2331: 2306: 2071:{\displaystyle G} 2051:{\displaystyle x} 2020: 1801: 1590:{\displaystyle G} 1329: 1253: 1193: 1166:{\displaystyle x} 1146:{\displaystyle G} 1126:{\displaystyle x} 1105:{\displaystyle x} 948: 866:{\displaystyle G} 846:{\displaystyle y} 826:{\displaystyle x} 788: 732:{\displaystyle w} 712:{\displaystyle m} 663:{\displaystyle H} 602:{\displaystyle x} 582:{\displaystyle y} 559:{\displaystyle x} 539:{\displaystyle x} 519:{\displaystyle E} 492:{\displaystyle x} 472:{\displaystyle x} 444: 443: 353: 352: 113:Peter C. Fishburn 16:(Redirected from 3352: 3335:Choice modelling 3321: 3316:. Archived from 3300: 3299: 3297: 3285: 3279: 3278: 3250: 3230: 3224: 3223: 3198:(4): 1335–1347. 3187: 3181: 3180: 3155:(7): 1931–1946. 3144: 3138: 3137: 3112:(8): 2177–2188. 3101: 3095: 3094: 3074: 3068: 3067: 3039: 3033: 3032: 3030: 3002: 2996: 2995: 2951: 2945: 2944: 2910: 2890: 2881: 2880: 2852: 2846: 2845: 2821: 2815: 2814: 2790: 2784: 2783: 2766:(4): 1407–1418. 2753: 2747: 2746: 2743:The Decision Lab 2735: 2729: 2728: 2718: 2696: 2690: 2689: 2687: 2677: 2653: 2647: 2646: 2616: 2607: 2606: 2588: 2582: 2581: 2561: 2555: 2554: 2531:Economic Journal 2526: 2421: 2419: 2418: 2413: 2397: 2395: 2394: 2389: 2377: 2375: 2374: 2369: 2345: 2320: 2318: 2317: 2312: 2307: 2305: 2297: 2289: 2280: 2279: 2270: 2269: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2238: 2212: 2211: 2187: 2186: 2171: 2170: 2161: 2160: 2136: 2135: 2077: 2075: 2074: 2069: 2057: 2055: 2054: 2049: 2034: 2032: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2019: 2011: 2003: 1994: 1993: 1984: 1983: 1967: 1963: 1962: 1952: 1947: 1946: 1921: 1919: 1918: 1913: 1911: 1910: 1888: 1886: 1885: 1880: 1856: 1854: 1853: 1848: 1842: 1834: 1825: 1824: 1815: 1814: 1802: 1800: 1792: 1784: 1775: 1774: 1765: 1764: 1745: 1716:Then, using the 1712: 1710: 1709: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1686: 1685: 1676: 1675: 1657: 1656: 1644: 1643: 1634: 1633: 1596: 1594: 1593: 1588: 1576: 1574: 1573: 1568: 1566: 1565: 1543: 1541: 1540: 1535: 1511: 1509: 1508: 1503: 1468: 1467: 1434: 1433: 1418: 1417: 1399: 1398: 1365: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1354: 1348: 1337: 1336: 1331: 1330: 1322: 1318: 1313: 1297: 1296: 1271: 1269: 1268: 1263: 1261: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1246: 1232: 1230: 1229: 1224: 1201: 1200: 1195: 1194: 1186: 1172: 1170: 1169: 1164: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1132: 1130: 1129: 1124: 1111: 1109: 1108: 1103: 1088: 1086: 1085: 1080: 1054: 1053: 1029: 1028: 1013: 1012: 1003: 1002: 978: 974: 973: 972: 967: 961: 950: 949: 941: 938: 933: 898: 896: 895: 890: 872: 870: 869: 864: 852: 850: 849: 844: 832: 830: 829: 824: 809: 807: 806: 801: 790: 789: 781: 765: 763: 762: 757: 755: 754: 738: 736: 735: 730: 718: 716: 715: 710: 698:full column rank 695: 693: 692: 687: 669: 667: 666: 661: 646: 644: 643: 638: 608: 606: 605: 600: 588: 586: 585: 580: 565: 563: 562: 557: 545: 543: 542: 537: 525: 523: 522: 517: 498: 496: 495: 490: 478: 476: 475: 470: 366: 253: 188:, among others. 120:utility function 69:negative emotion 21: 3360: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3345:Decision theory 3325: 3324: 3320:on 3 July 2015. 3312: 3309: 3304: 3303: 3287: 3286: 3282: 3267: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3146: 3145: 3141: 3103: 3102: 3098: 3076: 3075: 3071: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2908:10.1.1.492.9980 2892: 2891: 2884: 2854: 2853: 2849: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2792: 2791: 2787: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2737: 2736: 2732: 2698: 2697: 2693: 2655: 2654: 2650: 2618: 2617: 2610: 2603: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2543:10.2307/2232669 2528: 2527: 2523: 2518: 2485:Decision theory 2471: 2432: 2404: 2403: 2380: 2379: 2326: 2325: 2271: 2261: 2254: 2240: 2239: 2203: 2178: 2162: 2152: 2127: 2083: 2082: 2060: 2059: 2040: 2039: 1985: 1975: 1968: 1954: 1953: 1938: 1927: 1926: 1902: 1891: 1890: 1862: 1861: 1816: 1806: 1766: 1756: 1749: 1724: 1723: 1687: 1677: 1667: 1648: 1635: 1625: 1602: 1601: 1579: 1578: 1557: 1546: 1545: 1517: 1516: 1459: 1425: 1409: 1390: 1349: 1319: 1308: 1304: 1288: 1277: 1276: 1243: 1238: 1237: 1183: 1178: 1177: 1155: 1154: 1135: 1134: 1115: 1114: 1094: 1093: 1045: 1020: 1004: 994: 962: 928: 924: 904: 903: 875: 874: 855: 854: 835: 834: 815: 814: 774: 773: 746: 741: 740: 721: 720: 701: 700: 672: 671: 652: 651: 614: 613: 591: 590: 571: 570: 548: 547: 528: 527: 508: 507: 481: 480: 461: 460: 453: 247: 194: 182: 173: 158:Experiments in 153: 133:hyperbolic sine 97: 57:regret aversion 32:decision theory 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3358: 3356: 3348: 3347: 3342: 3337: 3327: 3326: 3323: 3322: 3308: 3307:External links 3305: 3302: 3301: 3280: 3265: 3225: 3182: 3139: 3096: 3085:(253): 55–67. 3069: 3050:(2): 107–116. 3034: 3013:(6): 685–692. 2997: 2962:(8): 678–681. 2946: 2901:(5): 346–350. 2882: 2847: 2816: 2805:(2): 148–158. 2785: 2748: 2730: 2691: 2648: 2608: 2601: 2583: 2572:(5): 961–981. 2556: 2537:(4): 805–824. 2520: 2519: 2517: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2507: 2502: 2497: 2492: 2487: 2482: 2477: 2470: 2467: 2431: 2428: 2411: 2387: 2367: 2364: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2344: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2322: 2321: 2310: 2304: 2301: 2296: 2293: 2288: 2284: 2278: 2274: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2257: 2252: 2247: 2243: 2236: 2233: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2221: 2218: 2215: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2199: 2196: 2193: 2190: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2169: 2165: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2148: 2145: 2142: 2139: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2067: 2047: 2036: 2035: 2024: 2018: 2015: 2010: 2007: 2002: 1998: 1992: 1988: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1966: 1961: 1957: 1950: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1934: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1898: 1878: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1858: 1857: 1846: 1841: 1838: 1833: 1829: 1823: 1819: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1799: 1796: 1791: 1788: 1783: 1779: 1773: 1769: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1752: 1748: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1714: 1713: 1702: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1684: 1680: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1663: 1660: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1642: 1638: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1609: 1586: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1553: 1533: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1513: 1512: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1480: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1421: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1386: 1383: 1380: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1364: 1358: 1353: 1347: 1343: 1340: 1335: 1328: 1325: 1317: 1312: 1307: 1303: 1300: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1284: 1259: 1252: 1249: 1234: 1233: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1199: 1192: 1189: 1162: 1142: 1122: 1101: 1090: 1089: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1057: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1016: 1011: 1007: 1001: 997: 993: 990: 987: 984: 981: 977: 971: 966: 960: 956: 953: 947: 944: 937: 932: 927: 923: 920: 917: 914: 911: 888: 885: 882: 862: 842: 822: 811: 810: 799: 796: 793: 787: 784: 753: 749: 728: 708: 685: 682: 679: 659: 648: 647: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 621: 598: 578: 555: 535: 515: 488: 468: 452: 449: 442: 441: 436: 433: 430: 427: 423: 422: 417: 414: 411: 408: 404: 403: 398: 395: 392: 389: 385: 384: 379: 376: 373: 370: 351: 350: 345: 340: 335: 329: 328: 323: 320: 317: 314: 310: 309: 304: 301: 298: 295: 291: 290: 285: 282: 279: 276: 272: 271: 266: 263: 260: 257: 246: 243: 223: 222: 217: 212: 202:Leonard Savage 193: 192:Minimax regret 190: 181: 178: 172: 169: 152: 149: 141:Allais paradox 96: 93: 85:human behavior 55:The theory of 26: 24: 18:Minimax regret 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3357: 3346: 3343: 3341: 3338: 3336: 3333: 3332: 3330: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3310: 3306: 3296: 3291: 3284: 3281: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3249: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3229: 3226: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3186: 3183: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3143: 3140: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3100: 3097: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3073: 3070: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3038: 3035: 3029: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3001: 2998: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2950: 2947: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2909: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2889: 2887: 2883: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2863:(2–3): 1–29. 2862: 2858: 2851: 2848: 2843: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2820: 2817: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2789: 2786: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2752: 2749: 2744: 2740: 2734: 2731: 2726: 2722: 2717: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2695: 2692: 2686: 2681: 2676: 2675:10.3982/TE738 2671: 2668:(1): 95–108. 2667: 2663: 2659: 2652: 2649: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2623: 2615: 2613: 2609: 2604: 2602:90-277-1420-7 2598: 2594: 2587: 2584: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2560: 2557: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2525: 2522: 2515: 2511: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2498: 2496: 2495:Loss function 2493: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2472: 2468: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2429: 2427: 2425: 2409: 2401: 2385: 2365: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2347: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2308: 2302: 2299: 2294: 2291: 2286: 2282: 2276: 2272: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2255: 2250: 2245: 2241: 2234: 2231: 2225: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2208: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2191: 2183: 2179: 2175: 2167: 2163: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2112: 2109: 2106: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2088: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2065: 2045: 2022: 2016: 2013: 2008: 2005: 2000: 1996: 1990: 1986: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1969: 1964: 1959: 1955: 1948: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1932: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1873: 1867: 1844: 1839: 1836: 1831: 1827: 1821: 1817: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1797: 1794: 1789: 1786: 1781: 1777: 1771: 1767: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1741: 1735: 1729: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1700: 1695: 1692: 1682: 1678: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1661: 1658: 1653: 1649: 1640: 1636: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1619: 1613: 1607: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1584: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1528: 1522: 1499: 1496: 1490: 1484: 1478: 1475: 1472: 1464: 1456: 1450: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1414: 1406: 1400: 1395: 1391: 1384: 1378: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1356: 1341: 1338: 1333: 1323: 1305: 1301: 1298: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1282: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1257: 1247: 1220: 1217: 1211: 1205: 1202: 1197: 1187: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1160: 1140: 1120: 1099: 1076: 1073: 1067: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1050: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1033: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1009: 1005: 999: 995: 991: 985: 982: 979: 975: 969: 954: 951: 942: 925: 921: 918: 915: 912: 909: 902: 901: 900: 886: 883: 880: 860: 840: 820: 797: 794: 791: 782: 772: 771: 770: 767: 751: 747: 726: 706: 699: 683: 680: 677: 657: 634: 631: 628: 625: 622: 619: 612: 611: 610: 596: 576: 567: 553: 533: 513: 506: 502: 486: 466: 458: 450: 448: 440: 437: 434: 431: 428: 426:Money market 425: 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 409: 406: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 386: 383: 380: 377: 374: 371: 368: 367: 364: 361: 358: 349: 346: 344: 341: 339: 336: 334: 331: 330: 327: 324: 321: 318: 315: 313:Money market 312: 311: 308: 305: 302: 299: 296: 293: 292: 289: 286: 283: 280: 277: 274: 273: 270: 267: 264: 261: 258: 255: 254: 251: 244: 242: 240: 236: 232: 227: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 207: 206: 203: 199: 191: 189: 187: 179: 177: 170: 168: 164: 161: 156: 150: 148: 144: 142: 138: 134: 128: 126: 121: 116: 114: 110: 109:Robert Sugden 106: 105:Graham Loomes 102: 94: 92: 90: 86: 82: 81:feedback loop 78: 77:risk aversion 74: 70: 66: 62: 58: 53: 51: 50: 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 3318:the original 3283: 3238: 3228: 3195: 3191: 3185: 3152: 3148: 3142: 3109: 3105: 3099: 3082: 3078: 3072: 3047: 3043: 3037: 3010: 3006: 3000: 2959: 2955: 2949: 2898: 2894: 2860: 2856: 2850: 2836:(1): 63–78. 2833: 2829: 2819: 2802: 2798: 2788: 2763: 2757: 2751: 2742: 2733: 2706: 2700: 2694: 2685:10419/150148 2665: 2661: 2651: 2626: 2620: 2592: 2586: 2569: 2565: 2559: 2534: 2530: 2524: 2464: 2455: 2447: 2443: 2438:. These are 2433: 2323: 2078:is equal to 2037: 1859: 1715: 1514: 1235: 1091: 812: 768: 696:matrix with 649: 568: 454: 445: 438: 419: 400: 382:Worst regret 381: 375:Static rates 362: 354: 347: 342: 337: 332: 325: 306: 287: 269:Worst return 268: 262:Static rates 248: 234: 230: 228: 224: 195: 183: 180:Applications 174: 165: 157: 154: 145: 129: 125:transitivity 117: 98: 73:reputational 64: 60: 56: 54: 47: 43: 34:, on making 29: 2505:Swap regret 1922:, one gets 1236:The MSE of 670:is a known 333:Best return 231:differences 95:Description 40:uncertainty 3329:Categories 3295:2311.07754 3248:2009.05518 3028:2142/28707 2716:2301.02447 2629:: 88–119. 2516:References 2460:mechanisms 1889:back into 355:The crude 215:Prediction 65:anticipate 3275:221640554 3064:153522835 2976:0956-7976 2925:0956-7976 2903:CiteSeerX 2877:254978441 2444:Principal 2340:∈ 2292:− 2277:∗ 2267:∗ 2246:∗ 2235:− 2220:− 2209:∗ 2195:− 2184:∗ 2168:∗ 2119:− 2006:− 1991:∗ 1981:∗ 1960:∗ 1837:− 1822:∗ 1812:∗ 1787:− 1772:∗ 1762:∗ 1693:− 1683:∗ 1673:∗ 1641:∗ 1631:∗ 1476:− 1465:∗ 1442:− 1431:∗ 1415:∗ 1339:− 1327:^ 1251:^ 1191:^ 1062:− 1051:∗ 1037:− 1026:∗ 1010:∗ 952:− 946:^ 884:× 786:^ 681:× 505:ellipsoid 457:estimator 220:Economics 36:decisions 3220:16732469 3177:15596014 3134:16417895 2984:17680936 2933:15102146 2780:51815774 2643:36505167 2469:See also 873:is some 853:, where 151:Evidence 89:rational 3200:Bibcode 3157:Bibcode 3114:Bibcode 2992:7524552 2551:2232669 2500:Minimax 388:Stocks 357:maximin 275:Stocks 245:Example 198:minimax 3273:  3263:  3218:  3175:  3132:  3062:  2990:  2982:  2974:  2941:748553 2939:  2931:  2923:  2905:  2875:  2778:  2641:  2599:  2549:  719:, and 650:where 407:Bonds 369:Regret 294:Bonds 256:Return 235:ratios 49:regret 38:under 3290:arXiv 3271:S2CID 3243:arXiv 3216:S2CID 3173:S2CID 3130:S2CID 3060:S2CID 2988:S2CID 2937:S2CID 2873:S2CID 2776:S2CID 2711:arXiv 2639:S2CID 2547:JSTOR 2448:Agent 833:from 44:after 3261:ISBN 2980:PMID 2972:ISSN 2929:PMID 2921:ISSN 2597:ISBN 2446:and 769:Let 196:The 107:and 3253:doi 3208:doi 3165:doi 3122:doi 3087:doi 3052:doi 3023:hdl 3015:doi 2964:doi 2913:doi 2865:doi 2838:doi 2807:doi 2768:doi 2721:doi 2707:117 2680:hdl 2670:doi 2631:doi 2627:172 2574:doi 2539:doi 2333:sup 1272:is 233:or 59:or 30:In 3331:: 3269:. 3259:. 3251:. 3237:. 3214:. 3206:. 3196:53 3194:. 3171:. 3163:. 3153:52 3151:. 3128:. 3120:. 3110:52 3108:. 3083:46 3081:. 3058:. 3046:. 3021:. 3011:35 3009:. 2986:. 2978:. 2970:. 2960:18 2958:. 2935:. 2927:. 2919:. 2911:. 2899:15 2897:. 2885:^ 2871:. 2861:55 2859:. 2834:72 2832:. 2828:. 2803:65 2801:. 2797:. 2774:. 2764:97 2762:. 2741:. 2719:. 2709:. 2705:. 2678:. 2664:. 2660:. 2637:. 2625:. 2611:^ 2570:30 2568:. 2545:. 2535:92 2533:. 2426:. 1544:, 1173:: 766:. 439:11 435:11 348:12 307:−2 297:−2 288:−4 284:12 278:−4 143:. 3298:. 3292:: 3277:. 3255:: 3245:: 3222:. 3210:: 3202:: 3179:. 3167:: 3159:: 3136:. 3124:: 3116:: 3093:. 3089:: 3066:. 3054:: 3048:7 3031:. 3025:: 3017:: 2994:. 2966:: 2943:. 2915:: 2879:. 2867:: 2844:. 2840:: 2813:. 2809:: 2782:. 2770:: 2745:. 2727:. 2723:: 2713:: 2688:. 2682:: 2672:: 2666:6 2645:. 2633:: 2605:. 2580:. 2576:: 2553:. 2541:: 2410:x 2386:x 2366:. 2363:) 2360:G 2357:, 2354:x 2351:( 2348:R 2343:E 2337:x 2309:. 2303:x 2300:H 2295:1 2287:w 2283:C 2273:H 2263:x 2259:+ 2256:1 2251:x 2242:x 2232:x 2229:) 2226:H 2223:G 2217:I 2214:( 2205:) 2201:H 2198:G 2192:I 2189:( 2180:x 2176:+ 2173:) 2164:G 2158:w 2154:C 2150:G 2147:( 2144:r 2141:T 2138:= 2133:o 2129:E 2125:S 2122:M 2116:E 2113:S 2110:M 2107:= 2104:) 2101:G 2098:, 2095:x 2092:( 2089:R 2066:G 2046:x 2023:. 2017:x 2014:H 2009:1 2001:w 1997:C 1987:H 1977:x 1973:+ 1970:1 1965:x 1956:x 1949:= 1944:o 1940:E 1936:S 1933:M 1908:o 1904:E 1900:S 1897:M 1877:) 1874:x 1871:( 1868:G 1845:. 1840:1 1832:w 1828:C 1818:H 1808:x 1804:x 1798:x 1795:H 1790:1 1782:w 1778:C 1768:H 1758:x 1754:+ 1751:1 1747:1 1742:= 1739:) 1736:x 1733:( 1730:G 1701:. 1696:1 1689:) 1679:H 1669:x 1665:x 1662:H 1659:+ 1654:w 1650:C 1646:( 1637:H 1627:x 1623:x 1620:= 1617:) 1614:x 1611:( 1608:G 1585:G 1563:o 1559:E 1555:S 1552:M 1532:) 1529:x 1526:( 1523:G 1500:. 1497:x 1494:) 1491:H 1488:) 1485:x 1482:( 1479:G 1473:I 1470:( 1461:) 1457:H 1454:) 1451:x 1448:( 1445:G 1439:I 1436:( 1427:x 1423:+ 1420:) 1411:) 1407:x 1404:( 1401:G 1396:w 1392:C 1388:) 1385:x 1382:( 1379:G 1376:( 1373:r 1370:T 1367:= 1363:) 1357:2 1352:| 1346:| 1342:x 1334:o 1324:x 1316:| 1311:| 1306:( 1302:E 1299:= 1294:o 1290:E 1286:S 1283:M 1258:o 1248:x 1221:. 1218:y 1215:) 1212:x 1209:( 1206:G 1203:= 1198:o 1188:x 1161:x 1141:G 1121:x 1100:x 1077:. 1074:x 1071:) 1068:H 1065:G 1059:I 1056:( 1047:) 1043:H 1040:G 1034:I 1031:( 1022:x 1018:+ 1015:) 1006:G 1000:w 996:C 992:G 989:( 986:r 983:T 980:= 976:) 970:2 965:| 959:| 955:x 943:x 936:| 931:| 926:( 922:E 919:= 916:E 913:S 910:M 887:n 881:m 861:G 841:y 821:x 798:y 795:G 792:= 783:x 752:w 748:C 727:w 707:m 684:m 678:n 658:H 635:w 632:+ 629:x 626:H 623:= 620:y 597:x 577:y 554:x 534:x 514:E 487:x 467:x 432:2 429:0 420:5 416:4 413:1 410:5 401:7 397:0 394:0 391:7 343:4 338:3 326:1 322:1 319:2 316:3 303:8 300:3 281:4 20:)

Index

Minimax regret
decision theory
decisions
uncertainty
regret
negative emotion
reputational
risk aversion
feedback loop
human behavior
rational
theoretical economics
Graham Loomes
Robert Sugden
Peter C. Fishburn
utility function
transitivity
hyperbolic sine
stochastic dominance
Allais paradox
first price auctions
disposition effect
minimax
Leonard Savage
Hypothesis testing
Prediction
Economics
ordinal measurements
maximin
estimator

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.