70:
N.B. was represented by lawyers from the Slovak feminist group Center for Civil and Human Rights from Košice who represent many other similar cases. After the decision, they called on the Slovak
Government to compensate all the victims in pending cases instead of repeatedly "facing an international
62:
Afterwards, in 2004, N.B. sued the
Hospital for damages and she also started criminal proceedings against the doctors. In 2008, the District Court in Spišska Nova Ves found sterilization illegal and granted her compensations in amount of app. 1,590 EUR. N.B. found this inadequate in the view of the
58:
Hospital, in
Eastern Slovakia, during the caesarean section delivery of her second child v on 25 April 2001. At the time of sterilization, she was only 17 years old, and was a legal minor under the Slovak law. Informed consent of her legal guardians (parents) was legally required. However, the
59:
guardians did not give any consent to sterilization and no record on this was entered in the release report from the hospital. N.B. found about the sterilization only several months later, after her lawyers inspected her medical records in the
Hospital.
146:
161:
156:
119:
88:
48:
151:
64:
34:
44:
67:
rejected her complaints, so she brought the case to the
European Court. The Court ruled in her favour on 12 June 2012.
166:
131:
22:
95:
39:
113:
37:. The decision came only few months after the release of the judgment in the similar case
140:
26:
132:
Judgement of the
European Court of 12 June 2012 on Application no. 29518/10
30:
55:
47:
without informed consent in contravention of
Articles 3 and 8 of the
63:
seriousness of the forced intervention. The police and the
147:
European Court of Human Rights cases involving
Slovakia
162:
Article 8 of the
European Convention on Human Rights
157:
Article 3 of the
European Convention on Human Rights
43:. Once again, the Court unanimously found that the
8:
80:
118:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
111:
7:
54:N.B. was forcibly sterilized in the
49:European Convention on Human Rights
14:
65:Constitutional Court of Slovakia
45:Romani woman had been sterilized
71:humiliation and condemnation".
35:European Court of Human Rights
21:is the second case concerning
1:
183:
152:Antiziganism in Slovakia
29:or Gypsy women from
23:forced sterilization
167:Romani in Slovakia
40:V. C. vs. Slovakia
174:
124:
123:
117:
109:
107:
106:
100:
94:. Archived from
93:
85:
18:N.B. vs Slovakia
182:
181:
177:
176:
175:
173:
172:
171:
137:
136:
128:
127:
110:
104:
102:
98:
91:
89:"Archived copy"
87:
86:
82:
77:
33:decided by the
12:
11:
5:
180:
178:
170:
169:
164:
159:
154:
149:
139:
138:
135:
134:
126:
125:
79:
78:
76:
73:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
179:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
144:
142:
133:
130:
129:
121:
115:
101:on 2014-03-16
97:
90:
84:
81:
74:
72:
68:
66:
60:
57:
52:
50:
46:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
27:Romani people
24:
20:
19:
103:. Retrieved
96:the original
83:
69:
61:
53:
38:
17:
16:
15:
141:Categories
105:2014-11-26
75:References
114:cite web
31:Slovakia
56:Gelnica
99:(PDF)
92:(PDF)
120:link
25:of
143::
116:}}
112:{{
51:.
122:)
108:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.