Knowledge (XXG)

Policy of deliberate ambiguity

Source đź“ť

295: 77: 36: 572:, with a reference to semi-official sources within the Russian military and intelligence establishment, opined that Russia's warnings of its alleged preparedness for a nuclear response to certain non-nuclear acts on the part of NATO, were to be construed as "an attempt to create strategic uncertainty" to undermine Western concerted security policy. 237: 179: 479:, foreign governments have felt a need to be ambiguous regarding Taiwan. The PRC pressures states to recognize it as the sole legitimate representative of China, with which most states comply. In practice, however, most states maintain different levels of ambiguity on their attitudes to the Taiwan issue: see 549:
against Iran and Hezbollah), exceptions to its policy became more prominent. Israel actively acknowledged that its intervention in the war has been limited to missile strikes, which until 2017 were not officially acknowledged. Israel has also made rare exceptions to this policy to deny involvement in
514:
India's Draft Nuclear Doctrine of 2003 affirms its policies of "No First Use" and "Credible Minimum Deterrence", limiting its nuclear weapons posture. In spite of that, senior officials have implied that the country may have expanded their posture to include first-strike capabilities. It is not clear
706:
in reference to the use of chemical weapons on August 20, just one day prior. Specifically, Obama said: "We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized.
760:
Official U.S. Navy policy is "not to deploy nuclear weapons aboard surface ships, naval aircraft, attack submarines, or guided missile submarines. However, we do not discuss the presence or absence of nuclear weapons aboard specific ships, submarines, or aircraft.” Because the U.S. Navy refuses to
659:
As an example, in October 2021, President Biden announced a commitment that the United States would defend Taiwan if attacked by the People's Republic of China. But then the White House quickly clarified: "The president was not announcing any change in our policy and there is no change in our
819:
East German citizens were treated as West German citizens upon arrival in West Germany and exports to East Germany were treated as if they were domestic trade. That created a deliberately ambiguous policy that reconciled the demand by the rest of the world for West Germany to acknowledge the
378:
of being deliberately ambiguous with regard to all or certain aspects of its operational or positional policies. This is typically a way to avoid direct conflict while maintaining a masked more assertive or threatening position on a subject (broadly, a geopolitical
655:
has also seemingly abandoned strategic ambiguity, having said on several occasions that the United States would defend Taiwan if it was attacked. After each of these remarks, however, the White House declared that there had been no official change in policy.
878: 726: 553:
With regard to notable targeted killings and assassination attempts, Israel has often exhibited a more nuanced approach to policies of intentional ambiguity, as demonstrated by numerous assassination attempts on
425: 663:
In May 2022 Biden again stated that the U.S. would intervene militarily if China invaded Taiwan. Though a White House official again stated that the statement did not indicate a policy shift.
761:
confirm whether any particular ship is or is not carrying nuclear weapons, this was an effective ban on the ships' entry into New Zealand territory. In response, the United States
778: 754: 94: 49: 671:
Another historic use of this policy is whether the United States would retaliate to a chemical or biological attack with nuclear weapons; specifically, during the
1306: 781:. Therefore, by not acknowledging that Israel likely has nuclear weapons, the US avoids having to sanction it for violating American anti-proliferation law. 833: 421: 546: 1283: 1097: 1053: 644:
stated that he would "do whatever it takes" to defend Taiwan. He later used more ambiguous language, stating in 2003 that "The United States policy is
527:, which its commentators term "nuclear ambiguity" or "nuclear opacity". It is a general consensus that Israel is in possession of nuclear weapons. 538:. Prior to 2017, Israel generally neither confirmed or denied whether Israel was involved in the deaths of suspected terrorists on foreign soil. 720: 141: 1381: 1035: 1439: 777:
The United States also tolerates Israel's deliberate ambiguity as to whether Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel is not a signatory to the
745:. New Zealand has not banned civilian nuclear energy, but it is no longer used there and the public is quite opposed, thereby making it a 597: 189: 113: 200: 316: 55: 621: 449: 120: 640:
leaders and an invasion of Taiwan by the PRC. The United States seemingly abandoned strategic ambiguity in 2001 after then-President
625: 341: 276: 218: 160: 63: 821: 1434: 535: 429: 127: 1258: 495: 1364: 1214: 696: 98: 620:
The United States has numerous ambiguous policies relating to its positions on Taiwan. This issue is at the cornerstone of
109: 716: 307: 629: 585: 484: 812:
recognizing East Germany in the 1970s, despite still maintaining several policies in accordance with the fictive but
558:. This example of 'policy opacity' demonstrates how the approach to a subject can change with time and circumstance. 254: 247: 1190: 524: 480: 468: 380: 87: 1240: 738: 1162: 502:
and other various international organizations and events participate under the deliberately ambiguous name of "
820:
existence of East Germany and the desire by the vast majority of West German politicians to avoid recognizing
134: 688: 601: 461: 397: 1339:"OPNAVINST 5721.1F, RELEASE OF INFORMATION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND ON NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES OF U.S. FORCES" 612:
The United States has utilized numerous policies of strategic ambiguity in numerous geopolitical areas.
193:
that states a Knowledge (XXG) editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic.
987: 683:
broke US policy and damaged U.S. interests by failing to take sufficient action against the regime of
1130:. Vol. Asian alliances working paper series, paper 7. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. 1122: 848: 593: 806:(thus implicitly following a "one-Germany policy"), West Germany turned to a policy of virtually or 1071: 633: 433: 968: 919: 799: 750: 1141: 515:
whether this is an instance of deliberate ambiguity or merely discord among Indian leadership.
1360: 1314: 960: 853: 742: 703: 637: 491: 950: 911: 676: 645: 542: 531: 476: 457: 858: 684: 375: 355: 1338: 294: 734: 641: 581: 503: 405: 258: 1428: 972: 766: 730: 589: 555: 499: 445: 1419: 843: 838: 803: 795: 699: 680: 939:"India's Nuclear Doctrine: A Case of Strategic Dissonance or Deliberate Ambiguity" 604:
to the commanders of the submarines on what action to take in such circumstances.
1036:"IDF official said to confirm attack in Syria: 'First strike on Iranian targets'" 749:
nuclear-free country. This ban includes its 12 nmi (22-kilometer; 14-mile)
1382:"What the U.S. Government Really Thought of Israel's Apparent 1979 Nuclear Test" 401: 253:
The references used may be made clearer with a different or consistent style of
76: 424:(PRC) rules Mainland China under a one-party system and Hong Kong and Macau as 17: 453: 371: 1420:
Arms Control Association: U.S. Nuclear Policy: "Negative Security Assurances"
1318: 964: 652: 568: 409: 1307:"Analysis | President Obama and the 'red line' on Syria's chemical weapons" 1405:
Strategic ambiguities: Essays on communication, organization, and identity
1012: 955: 938: 1167: 902:
Chan, Gerald (1985). "The "Two-Chinas" Problem and the Olympic Formula".
808: 672: 1241:"Biden Said the U.S. Would Protect Taiwan. But It's Not That Clear-Cut" 923: 1357:
Nuclear Free: The New Zealand Way: Books: David Lange, Michael Gifkins
692: 441: 437: 417: 1054:"U.S. officials confirm Israel launched pre-dawn airstrike on Syria" 915: 762: 472: 413: 988:"Vague, Opaque and Ambiguous — Israel's Hush-Hush Nuclear Policy" 530:
Israel has also practiced deliberate ambiguity over the issue of
763:
partially suspended New Zealand from the ANZUS military alliance
707:
That would change my calculus. That would change my equation."
802:" of ending diplomatic relations with any country recognizing 288: 230: 172: 70: 29: 741:
from its sovereign territory; thereby making it a military
566:
In early April 2015, an editorial in the British newspaper
190:
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
1259:"Biden: US would intervene with military to defend Taiwan" 1215:"China vows no concessions on Taiwan after Biden comments" 769:
stated that New Zealand was "a friend, but not an ally".
312: 196: 523:
Israel is deliberately ambiguous as to whether or not
592:
in the event that the government were destroyed by a
879:"What is the right amount of 'Strategic Ambiguity'?" 1098:"The UK's nuclear deterrent: what you need to know" 481:
Foreign relations of the People's Republic of China
101:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 1124:The United States Security Partnership with Taiwan 779:Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons 816:legal principle of there being only one Germany. 1142:"Bush vows 'whatever it takes' to defend Taiwan" 628:. This policy was intended to discourage both a 755:United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 448:, which the ROC collectively refers to as the " 404:over all of China, which they claim includes 8: 584:is deliberately ambiguous about whether its 64:Learn how and when to remove these messages 1380:Cohen, Abner; Burr, William (2016-12-08). 667:Response to chemical or biological warfare 494:and the following 1981 agreement with the 485:Foreign relations of the Republic of China 954: 342:Learn how and when to remove this message 277:Learn how and when to remove this message 219:Learn how and when to remove this message 161:Learn how and when to remove this message 870: 679:. Some commentators believe President 721:United States Navy Nuclear Propulsion 420:, as well as some other islands. The 7: 596:. Upon taking office, the incoming 99:adding citations to reliable sources 1195:American Enterprise Institute - AEI 1015:. Federation of American Scientists 986:Bronner, Ethan (October 13, 2010). 695:near Damascus on August 21, 2013. 498:, those from Taiwan who attend the 1191:"The Fourth Taiwan Strait Slip-Up" 1163:"Bush Opposes Taiwan Independence" 450:Free area of the Republic of China 387:Examples of geopolitical ambiguity 25: 1284:"What, exactly, is a 'red line'?" 396:Currently, two governments claim 306:to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s 45:This article has multiple issues. 711:Nuclear weapons on surface ships 624:and a central sticking point in 452:". For further background, see 293: 235: 177: 110:"Policy of deliberate ambiguity" 75: 34: 1282:Wordsworth, Dot (8 June 2013). 1239:Sanger, David E. (2021-10-22). 691:on civilians in the village of 541:However, with the onset of the 496:International Olympic Committee 86:needs additional citations for 53:or discuss these issues on the 675:. Related is the notion of a 622:United States–Taiwan relations 426:special administrative regions 360:policy of deliberate ambiguity 1: 1305:Kessler, Glenn (2013-09-06). 883:www.theuncertaintyproject.org 729:, New Zealand has banned all 717:New Zealand nuclear-free zone 626:United States–China relations 550:certain killings in the war. 937:Sultan, Adil (August 2018). 586:ballistic missile submarines 525:it possesses nuclear weapons 1440:Israeli nuclear development 1189:Cooper, Zack (2022-09-19). 467:Owing to the controversial 362:(also known as a policy of 1456: 1403:Eisenberg, Eric M (2007), 1013:"Nuclear weapons – Israel" 773:Nuclear weapons and Israel 739:nuclear powered propulsion 714: 588:would carry out a nuclear 473:People's Republic of China 469:political status of Taiwan 422:People's Republic of China 1407:, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage 1072:"From Russia with Menace" 1286:. The Spectator magazine 319:may contain suggestions. 304:may need to be rewritten 1435:International relations 490:Starting with the 1979 370:) is the practice by a 1121:Bush, Richard (2016). 733:means of war, whether 689:Ghouta chemical attack 630:unilateral declaration 602:letters of last resort 462:Cross-Strait relations 199:by rewriting it in an 27:Type of foreign policy 1355:Lange, David (1990). 1040:www.timesofisrael.com 956:10.31945/iprij.180202 790:East and West Germany 715:Further information: 368:strategic uncertainty 1144:. CNN TV. 2001-04-25 849:Non-Aligned Movement 702:had used the phrase 594:nuclear first strike 547:Israel's involvement 95:improve this article 785:Historical Examples 364:strategic ambiguity 1245:The New York Times 992:The New York Times 834:Country neutrality 800:Hallstein Doctrine 751:territorial waters 442:Pescadores Islands 432:(ROC) governs the 354:In the context of 201:encyclopedic style 188:is written like a 1359:. Penguin Books. 854:Flexible response 743:nuclear-free zone 532:targeted killings 492:Nagoya Resolution 430:Republic of China 352: 351: 344: 334: 333: 308:quality standards 287: 286: 279: 229: 228: 221: 171: 170: 163: 145: 68: 16:(Redirected from 1447: 1408: 1390: 1389: 1377: 1371: 1370: 1352: 1346: 1345: 1343: 1335: 1329: 1328: 1326: 1325: 1302: 1296: 1295: 1293: 1291: 1279: 1273: 1272: 1270: 1269: 1255: 1249: 1248: 1236: 1230: 1229: 1227: 1226: 1211: 1205: 1204: 1202: 1201: 1186: 1180: 1179: 1177: 1176: 1159: 1153: 1152: 1150: 1149: 1138: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1118: 1112: 1111: 1109: 1108: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1083: 1068: 1062: 1061: 1050: 1044: 1043: 1034:staff, T. O. I. 1031: 1025: 1024: 1022: 1020: 1009: 1003: 1002: 1000: 998: 983: 977: 976: 958: 934: 928: 927: 899: 893: 892: 890: 889: 875: 822:German partition 677:nuclear umbrella 673:Persian Gulf War 543:Syrian Civil War 477:One-China policy 458:One-China policy 434:Island of Taiwan 347: 340: 329: 326: 320: 297: 289: 282: 275: 271: 268: 262: 239: 238: 231: 224: 217: 213: 210: 204: 181: 180: 173: 166: 159: 155: 152: 146: 144: 103: 79: 71: 60: 38: 37: 30: 21: 1455: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1425: 1424: 1416: 1402: 1399: 1394: 1393: 1379: 1378: 1374: 1367: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1323: 1321: 1311:Washington Post 1304: 1303: 1299: 1289: 1287: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1267: 1265: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1224: 1222: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1199: 1197: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1174: 1172: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1147: 1145: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1127: 1120: 1119: 1115: 1106: 1104: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1081: 1079: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1060:. 9 April 2018. 1052: 1051: 1047: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1018: 1016: 1011: 1010: 1006: 996: 994: 985: 984: 980: 936: 935: 931: 916:10.2307/2759241 904:Pacific Affairs 901: 900: 896: 887: 885: 877: 876: 872: 867: 859:Glomar response 830: 792: 787: 775: 735:nuclear weapons 731:nuclear powered 723: 713: 685:Bashar al-Assad 669: 618: 610: 578: 564: 521: 512: 436:as well as the 398:legitimate rule 394: 389: 376:non-state actor 356:global politics 348: 337: 336: 335: 330: 324: 321: 311: 298: 283: 272: 266: 263: 252: 246:has an unclear 240: 236: 225: 214: 208: 205: 197:help improve it 194: 182: 178: 167: 156: 150: 147: 104: 102: 92: 80: 39: 35: 28: 23: 22: 18:Nuclear opacity 15: 12: 11: 5: 1453: 1451: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1427: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1415: 1414:External links 1412: 1411: 1410: 1398: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1372: 1365: 1347: 1330: 1297: 1274: 1250: 1231: 1206: 1181: 1154: 1133: 1113: 1089: 1078:. 2 April 2015 1063: 1045: 1026: 1004: 978: 929: 910:(3): 473–490. 894: 869: 868: 866: 863: 862: 861: 856: 851: 846: 841: 836: 829: 826: 824:as permanent. 791: 788: 786: 783: 774: 771: 725:Since passing 712: 709: 668: 665: 642:George W. Bush 617: 614: 609: 606: 600:issues sealed 598:prime minister 590:counter-attack 582:United Kingdom 577: 576:United Kingdom 574: 563: 560: 520: 517: 511: 508: 504:Chinese Taipei 438:Kinmen Islands 406:Mainland China 393: 390: 388: 385: 350: 349: 332: 331: 301: 299: 292: 285: 284: 248:citation style 243: 241: 234: 227: 226: 185: 183: 176: 169: 168: 83: 81: 74: 69: 43: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1452: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1430: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1406: 1401: 1400: 1396: 1387: 1383: 1376: 1373: 1368: 1362: 1358: 1351: 1348: 1340: 1334: 1331: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1301: 1298: 1285: 1278: 1275: 1264: 1260: 1254: 1251: 1246: 1242: 1235: 1232: 1220: 1216: 1210: 1207: 1196: 1192: 1185: 1182: 1170: 1169: 1164: 1158: 1155: 1143: 1137: 1134: 1126: 1125: 1117: 1114: 1103: 1099: 1093: 1090: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1064: 1059: 1055: 1049: 1046: 1041: 1037: 1030: 1027: 1014: 1008: 1005: 993: 989: 982: 979: 974: 970: 966: 962: 957: 952: 948: 944: 940: 933: 930: 925: 921: 917: 913: 909: 905: 898: 895: 884: 880: 874: 871: 864: 860: 857: 855: 852: 850: 847: 845: 842: 840: 837: 835: 832: 831: 827: 825: 823: 817: 815: 811: 810: 805: 801: 798:gave up its " 797: 789: 784: 782: 780: 772: 770: 768: 767:Ronald Reagan 765:. President 764: 758: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 722: 718: 710: 708: 705: 701: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 666: 664: 661: 657: 654: 649: 647: 643: 639: 635: 631: 627: 623: 615: 613: 608:United States 607: 605: 603: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 575: 573: 571: 570: 561: 559: 557: 556:Mohammed Deif 551: 548: 544: 539: 537: 533: 528: 526: 518: 516: 509: 507: 505: 501: 500:Olympic Games 497: 493: 488: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 465: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446:Matsu Islands 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 391: 386: 384: 382: 381:risk aversion 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 346: 343: 328: 318: 314: 309: 305: 302:This article 300: 296: 291: 290: 281: 278: 270: 260: 256: 250: 249: 244:This article 242: 233: 232: 223: 220: 212: 202: 198: 192: 191: 186:This article 184: 175: 174: 165: 162: 154: 143: 140: 136: 133: 129: 126: 122: 119: 115: 112: â€“  111: 107: 106:Find sources: 100: 96: 90: 89: 84:This article 82: 78: 73: 72: 67: 65: 58: 57: 52: 51: 46: 41: 32: 31: 19: 1404: 1385: 1375: 1356: 1350: 1333: 1322:. Retrieved 1310: 1300: 1288:. Retrieved 1277: 1266:. Retrieved 1262: 1253: 1244: 1234: 1223:. Retrieved 1221:. 2021-10-22 1218: 1209: 1198:. Retrieved 1194: 1184: 1173:. Retrieved 1171:. 2003-12-09 1166: 1157: 1146:. Retrieved 1136: 1123: 1116: 1105:. Retrieved 1101: 1092: 1080:. Retrieved 1075: 1066: 1057: 1048: 1039: 1029: 1017:. Retrieved 1007: 995:. Retrieved 991: 981: 949:(2): 26–52. 946: 943:IPRI Journal 942: 932: 907: 903: 897: 886:. Retrieved 882: 873: 844:Dual loyalty 839:Double agent 818: 813: 807: 804:East Germany 796:West Germany 793: 776: 759: 746: 724: 700:Barack Obama 681:Barack Obama 670: 662: 658: 650: 634:independence 619: 616:Taiwan issue 611: 579: 567: 565: 552: 540: 529: 522: 513: 489: 466: 428:, while the 395: 367: 363: 359: 353: 338: 322: 313:You can help 303: 273: 264: 245: 215: 206: 187: 157: 151:January 2012 148: 138: 131: 124: 117: 105: 93:Please help 88:verification 85: 61: 54: 48: 47:Please help 44: 753:as per the 402:sovereignty 383:strategy). 1429:Categories 1366:0140145192 1324:2018-06-14 1268:2022-05-24 1225:2021-10-22 1200:2023-07-25 1175:2016-02-18 1148:2007-02-05 1107:2023-10-17 888:2023-10-16 865:References 727:a 1987 law 704:"red line" 660:policy". 651:President 536:airstrikes 454:Two Chinas 372:government 259:footnoting 121:newspapers 50:improve it 1319:0190-8286 1076:The Times 973:150024560 965:1684-9787 697:President 653:Joe Biden 646:one China 569:The Times 410:Hong Kong 325:July 2018 317:talk page 267:July 2018 209:July 2015 56:talk page 1386:Politico 1263:ABC News 1168:Fox News 1058:NBC News 997:March 6, 828:See also 809:de facto 747:de facto 687:for its 471:and the 444:and the 255:citation 1397:Sources 1290:30 July 1219:AP NEWS 1082:2 April 1019:July 1, 924:2759241 814:de jure 195:Please 135:scholar 1363:  1317:  1102:GOV.UK 971:  963:  922:  794:After 693:Ghouta 562:Russia 519:Israel 440:, the 418:Taiwan 315:. The 137:  130:  123:  116:  108:  1342:(PDF) 1128:(PDF) 969:S2CID 920:JSTOR 545:(and 510:India 414:Macau 392:China 142:JSTOR 128:books 1361:ISBN 1315:ISSN 1292:2013 1084:2015 1021:2007 999:2012 961:ISSN 947:VIII 719:and 580:The 534:and 483:and 460:and 416:and 400:and 358:, a 257:and 114:news 951:doi 912:doi 737:or 648:". 638:ROC 636:by 632:of 506:". 475:'s 374:or 366:or 97:by 1431:: 1384:. 1313:. 1309:. 1261:. 1243:. 1217:. 1193:. 1165:. 1100:. 1074:. 1056:. 1038:. 990:. 967:. 959:. 945:. 941:. 918:. 908:58 906:. 881:. 757:. 487:. 464:. 456:, 412:, 408:, 59:. 1409:. 1388:. 1369:. 1344:. 1327:. 1294:. 1271:. 1247:. 1228:. 1203:. 1178:. 1151:. 1110:. 1086:. 1042:. 1023:. 1001:. 975:. 953:: 926:. 914:: 891:. 345:) 339:( 327:) 323:( 310:. 280:) 274:( 269:) 265:( 261:. 251:. 222:) 216:( 211:) 207:( 203:. 164:) 158:( 153:) 149:( 139:· 132:· 125:· 118:· 91:. 66:) 62:( 20:)

Index

Nuclear opacity
improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Policy of deliberate ambiguity"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay
help improve it
encyclopedic style
Learn how and when to remove this message
citation style
citation
footnoting
Learn how and when to remove this message

quality standards
You can help
talk page
Learn how and when to remove this message
global politics
government

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑