Knowledge

Nationally significant infrastructure project

Source 📝

765: 97: 160:
be approved. An example would be the need for public consultation as the Planning Act 2008 requires that all applications for a DCO must follow the National Policy Statements, and during the pre-application process Section 47 requires the applicant to prepare a statement regarding how they propose to consult the local community. However, local residents revealed that pre-application consultation fell within the range of 'poor' to 'very poor' and a prominent critique was that communication between local authorities and the local community was too one sided and developers were reluctant to engage with local opinions and dialogue.
22: 120:. This was amended under Part 4 of the Planning Act 2008 where this new process would require a DCO. This is an application for approval to construct a NSIP which is dealt with by the Planning Inspectorate who recommends the application to the Secretary of State, whom in turn has the authority to decide upon whether development should go ahead. Prior to the introduction of the Planning Act 2008, it was apparent that the town and planning system was not a "one-size fits all" solution when it came to major infrastructure projects such as 124:, which had planning permission granted eight years after the inquiry was submitted. The introduction of the Planning Act was seen as more successful than the previous regime by most accounts, as it managed to reduce costs associated with the inefficient planning system by taking a more front-loaded approach such as the unification of the consent regime, introduction of National Policy Statements and introduction of a fixed timetable for the various stages of the application. 947: 133: 890: 833: 108:
This new regime was intended to replace the traditional planning system and managed to reduce uncertainty around NSIP by introducing DCOs which were aimed towards increasing efficiency by reducing the amount of consent regimes required to meet development consent, as the old system required approval over several pieces of legislation. One example would be that the
174:
uncertainty and frustration. The introduction of the Planning Act 2008 managed to remove the need for other consent regimes providing a "one stop shop" to receive consent, instead of having to go to several bodies. Part 4 of the Planning Act 2008 states that NSIP will require a DCO, eliminating the need to seek approval under different regimes.
159:
Common criticisms were directed towards the extensive pre-consultation requirements which meant that applications would take a long time to prepare as it takes two and a half months for consultation with the local authorities, the local community and statutory consultees before an application could
107:
NSIP are given planning permission via a Development Consent Order (DCO). The Planning Act 2008 created a new regime for development consent for certain types of nationally significant infrastructure, including but not limited to nuclear and wind energy, airports, harbours, and wastewater projects.
151:
from 7 meters (23 feet) to less than 7.5 meters (25 feet). This non-material change had been crucial to the construction of the wind turbines and had it not been approved, the entire NSIP would have been financially unviable. This reluctance for the approval of material amendments was strictly in
190:
on 15 November 2011, introduced further reforms towards the planning process for NSIP. The Localism Act 2011 reduced the number of local authorities that need to be consulted during the pre-application stage. In addition, the requirement that community consultation had to be published in a local
173:
Prior to the introduction of the Planning Act 2008, consents were often required under two or three pieces of legislation for a single project. The need for several different pieces of legislation to achieve planning consent meant that attempting to gain planning approval often led to delay,
738: 142:
The new procedure was criticised in various ways; one such criticism was that past the application stage, there was very little room for amendment. This could potentially be expensive and time-consuming if amendments to a DCO would be made. An example would be
816: 668: 612: 1007: 681: 73:, which began operating on 1 October 2009 on an advice and guidance basis. Full powers of the IPC to receive, examine and approve applications for development consent came into force on 1 March 2010. 752: 191:
newspaper was removed. This addressed some common complaints towards the planning process, which included that the pre-consultation requirements for NSIP were too onerous and time-consuming.
694:
Natarajan, L. (2017). "Navigating the participatory processes of renewable energy infrastructure regulation: A 'local participant perspective' on the NSIP's regime in England and Wales".
425: 954: 153: 1022: 355: 335: 721: 484: 152:
line with the vigorous pre-consultation requirements under part 4 of the Planning Act 2008, which many criticisms were also directed towards. A report published by the
1012: 260: 49:. These include proposals for power plants, large renewable energy projects, new airports and airport extensions, and major road and rail projects. The NSIP 96: 1017: 988: 84:. Since 1 April 2012, acceptance and examination of applications for development consent is dealt with by a new Infrastructure Planning Unit within the 46: 156:
detailing a post-implementation review of the new planning system has shown that there have not been any applications for a "material change" yet.
467:'The Race to the Water for Offshore Renewable Energy: Assessing Cumulative and In-Combination Impacts for Offshore Renewable Energy Developments' 1037: 874: 313: 931: 113: 81: 654:
Post Implementation Review of The Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011
117: 66: 722:
https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/key-issues-for-the-new-parliament/green-growth/major-infrastructure-planning
586: 556: 485:
https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/key-issues-for-the-new-parliament/green-growth/major-infrastructure-planning
234: 268: 790: 147:, where there had been a request submitted for a "non-material" change which specified a slight amendment to the diameter of each 100: 981: 208: 21: 398: 867: 817:
Government response to the consultation on the review of the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Planning Regime
974: 571: 144: 136: 924: 297: 703: 653: 1027: 696:
The International Journal of the Political, Economic, Planning, Environmental and Social Aspects of Energy
860: 85: 54: 26: 1032: 510: 364: 917: 148: 121: 526: 380: 739:
Major Infrastructure Planning: expanding and improving the 'one stop shop' approach for consents
543: 498: 350: 329: 309: 183: 77: 70: 34: 518: 372: 301: 627: 514: 440: 368: 958: 901: 844: 466: 426:
Planning Act 2008: Guidance for the examination of applications for development consent
289: 53:
began to be used in 2008, and since April 2012 these projects have been managed by the
305: 1001: 725: 530: 384: 112:
nuclear power station required consent under legislation including Section 2 of the
187: 80:, which transferred decision-making powers created by the 2008 Act to the relevant 50: 946: 132: 832: 109: 522: 376: 889: 840: 718:
Planning and major infrastructure: key issues for the 2010 Parliament
481:
Planning and major infrastructure: key issues for the 2010 Parliament
753:
Planning Act 2008: Guidance on Changes to Development Consent orders
628:"Attaining the age of consents: Five years of the planning act 2008" 441:"Attaining the age of consents: Five years of the planning act 2008" 669:
Reviewing the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Planning Regime
613:
Reviewing the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Planning Regime
897: 131: 95: 20: 594:
Infrastructure Delivery: The DCO Process in Context - Main Report
564:
Infrastructure Delivery: The DCO Process in Context - Main Report
1008:
Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (United Kingdom)
290:"E . The Town and Country Planning (Grants) Regulations, 1950" 962: 905: 848: 651:
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government,
791:"Policy statement for part 2 of the Localism Act 2011" 45:) is a major infrastructure development that bypasses 16:
Major infrastructure developments in England and Wales
587:"Infrastructure Delivery: the DCO process in context" 557:"Infrastructure Delivery: the DCO process in context" 399:"The process | National Infrastructure Planning" 154:
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
751:Department for Communities and Local Government, ' 499:"Infrastructure, planning and the command of time" 351:"Infrastructure, Planning and the Command of Time" 814:Department for Communities and Local Government, 736:Department for Communities and Local Government, 666:Department for Communities and Local Government, 610:Department for Communities and Local Government, 503:Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 423:Department for Communities and Local Government, 356:Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 955:Town and country planning in the United Kingdom 982: 925: 868: 544:The Galloper Wind Farm (Amendment) Order 2015 334:: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of April 2024 ( 116:and planning permission in Section 40 of the 39:nationally significant infrastructure project 8: 470:(2020) 32 Journal of Environmental Law 83. 989: 975: 932: 918: 875: 861: 76:The IPC was subsequently abolished by the 1023:United Kingdom industrial planning policy 497:Marshall, Tim; Cowell, Richard (2016). 200: 327: 65:NSIP were initially controlled by the 296:, Cambridge, MA and London, England: 7: 1013:Town and country planning in England 943: 941: 886: 884: 829: 827: 635:Joint Planning Law Conference Oxford 69:(IPC), which was established by the 29:, an NSIP which was approved in 2014 294:Land Planning Law in a Free Society 1018:Town and country planning in Wales 235:"National Infrastructure Planning" 67:Infrastructure Planning Commission 47:normal local planning requirements 14: 306:10.4159/harvard.9780674492608.c21 269:Campaign to Protect Rural England 945: 888: 831: 448:Joint Planning Conference Oxford 128:Criticisms of the new procedure 1: 1038:United Kingdom planning stubs 118:Town and Country Planning Act 961:. You can help Knowledge by 904:. You can help Knowledge by 847:. You can help Knowledge by 724:/> accessed 5 June 2021. 261:"Development Consent Orders" 487:/> accessed 5 June 2021. 405:. The Planning Inspectorate 403:planninginspectorate.gov.uk 239:planninginspectorate.gov.uk 215:. The Planning Inspectorate 213:planninginspectorate.gov.uk 145:Galloper offshore wind farm 137:Galloper offshore wind farm 1054: 940: 883: 826: 308:(inactive 24 April 2024), 114:Electric Lighting Act 1909 953:This article relating to 770:signon.thomsonreuters.com 766:"Practical Law UK Signon" 572:University College London 555:Morphet, Janice (2017). 523:10.1177/0263774X16642768 377:10.1177/0263774X16642768 298:Harvard University Press 103:B Nuclear Power Station 704:Elsevier Science Direct 626:White, Matthew (2013). 585:Morphet, Janet (2016). 439:White, Matthew (2013). 241:. Planning Inspectorate 209:"Thames Tideway Tunnel" 900:-related article is a 843:-related article is a 702:: 201–210 – via 682:Planning Act 2008 s 47 641:: 51 – via jplc. 454:: 55 – via jplc. 349:Marshall, Tim (2016). 139: 104: 30: 600:: 39 – via UCL. 464:Catherine Ann Caine, 135: 99: 86:Planning Inspectorate 55:Planning Inspectorate 27:Thames Tideway Tunnel 24: 509:(8): 1, 843–1, 866. 515:2016EnPlC..34.1843M 369:2016EnPlC..34.1843M 149:monopile foundation 122:Heathrow Terminal 5 140: 105: 82:Secretary of State 31: 970: 969: 913: 912: 856: 855: 570:: 57 – via 315:978-0-674-49260-8 186:, which received 184:Localism Act 2011 178:Localism Act 2011 169:Planning Act 2008 78:Localism Act 2011 71:Planning Act 2008 35:England and Wales 25:The route of the 1045: 991: 984: 977: 949: 942: 934: 927: 920: 892: 885: 877: 870: 863: 835: 828: 821: 812: 806: 805: 803: 801: 787: 781: 780: 778: 776: 762: 756: 749: 743: 734: 728: 714: 708: 707: 691: 685: 679: 673: 664: 658: 649: 643: 642: 632: 623: 617: 608: 602: 601: 591: 582: 576: 575: 561: 552: 546: 541: 535: 534: 494: 488: 477: 471: 462: 456: 455: 445: 436: 430: 421: 415: 414: 412: 410: 395: 389: 388: 363:(8): 1843–1866. 346: 340: 339: 333: 325: 324: 322: 286: 280: 279: 277: 275: 257: 251: 250: 248: 246: 231: 225: 224: 222: 220: 205: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1044: 1043: 1042: 998: 997: 996: 995: 939: 938: 882: 881: 825: 824: 813: 809: 799: 797: 789: 788: 784: 774: 772: 764: 763: 759: 750: 746: 735: 731: 716:UK Parliament, 715: 711: 693: 692: 688: 680: 676: 665: 661: 650: 646: 630: 625: 624: 620: 609: 605: 589: 584: 583: 579: 559: 554: 553: 549: 542: 538: 496: 495: 491: 479:UK Parliament, 478: 474: 463: 459: 443: 438: 437: 433: 422: 418: 408: 406: 397: 396: 392: 348: 347: 343: 326: 320: 318: 316: 288: 287: 283: 273: 271: 259: 258: 254: 244: 242: 233: 232: 228: 218: 216: 207: 206: 202: 197: 180: 171: 166: 130: 94: 63: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1051: 1049: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1000: 999: 994: 993: 986: 979: 971: 968: 967: 950: 937: 936: 929: 922: 914: 911: 910: 893: 880: 879: 872: 865: 857: 854: 853: 836: 823: 822: 807: 782: 757: 744: 729: 709: 686: 674: 659: 644: 618: 603: 577: 547: 536: 489: 472: 457: 431: 416: 390: 341: 314: 281: 252: 226: 199: 198: 196: 193: 179: 176: 170: 167: 165: 162: 129: 126: 93: 90: 62: 59: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1050: 1039: 1036: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1028:England stubs 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1003: 992: 987: 985: 980: 978: 973: 972: 966: 964: 960: 956: 951: 948: 944: 935: 930: 928: 923: 921: 916: 915: 909: 907: 903: 899: 894: 891: 887: 878: 873: 871: 866: 864: 859: 858: 852: 850: 846: 842: 837: 834: 830: 819: 818: 811: 808: 796: 792: 786: 783: 771: 767: 761: 758: 755:' (2015) (6). 754: 748: 745: 741: 740: 733: 730: 727: 723: 719: 713: 710: 705: 701: 697: 690: 687: 683: 678: 675: 671: 670: 663: 660: 657: 655: 648: 645: 640: 636: 629: 622: 619: 615: 614: 607: 604: 599: 595: 588: 581: 578: 573: 569: 565: 558: 551: 548: 545: 540: 537: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 493: 490: 486: 482: 476: 473: 469: 468: 461: 458: 453: 449: 442: 435: 432: 428: 427: 420: 417: 404: 400: 394: 391: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 357: 352: 345: 342: 337: 331: 317: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 285: 282: 270: 266: 262: 256: 253: 240: 236: 230: 227: 214: 210: 204: 201: 194: 192: 189: 185: 177: 175: 168: 163: 161: 157: 155: 150: 146: 138: 134: 127: 125: 123: 119: 115: 111: 102: 98: 91: 89: 87: 83: 79: 74: 72: 68: 60: 58: 56: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 28: 23: 19: 963:expanding it 952: 906:expanding it 895: 849:expanding it 838: 815: 810: 798:. Retrieved 794: 785: 773:. Retrieved 769: 760: 747: 737: 732: 717: 712: 699: 695: 689: 677: 667: 662: 652: 647: 638: 634: 621: 611: 606: 597: 593: 580: 567: 563: 550: 539: 506: 502: 492: 480: 475: 465: 460: 451: 447: 434: 424: 419: 407:. Retrieved 402: 393: 360: 354: 344: 319:, retrieved 293: 284: 272:. Retrieved 264: 255: 243:. Retrieved 238: 229: 217:. Retrieved 212: 203: 188:royal assent 181: 172: 158: 141: 106: 75: 64: 51:nomenclature 42: 38: 32: 18: 1033:Wales stubs 820:(2014) (5). 742:(2013) (1). 720:(2010) < 672:(2013) (11) 616:(2013) (11) 483:(2010) < 429:(2015) (4). 265:cpre.org.uk 1002:Categories 726:Categories 409:15 January 195:References 164:Amendments 110:Sizewell B 531:156846991 385:156846991 92:Procedure 330:citation 300:, 1951, 101:Sizewell 841:England 511:Bibcode 365:Bibcode 245:27 June 219:27 June 61:History 800:15 May 795:gov.uk 775:15 May 529:  383:  321:14 May 312:  274:23 May 957:is a 898:Wales 896:This 839:This 631:(PDF) 590:(PDF) 560:(PDF) 527:S2CID 444:(PDF) 381:S2CID 959:stub 902:stub 845:stub 802:2021 777:2021 411:2024 336:link 323:2021 310:ISBN 276:2020 247:2017 221:2017 182:The 43:NSIP 37:, a 700:114 519:doi 373:doi 302:doi 33:In 1004:: 793:. 768:. 698:. 639:41 637:. 633:. 596:. 592:. 566:. 562:. 525:. 517:. 507:34 505:. 501:. 452:41 450:. 446:. 401:. 379:. 371:. 361:34 359:. 353:. 332:}} 328:{{ 292:, 267:. 263:. 237:. 211:. 88:. 57:. 990:e 983:t 976:v 965:. 933:e 926:t 919:v 908:. 876:e 869:t 862:v 851:. 804:. 779:. 706:. 684:. 656:. 598:1 574:. 568:1 533:. 521:: 513:: 413:. 387:. 375:: 367:: 338:) 304:: 278:. 249:. 223:. 41:(

Index


Thames Tideway Tunnel
England and Wales
normal local planning requirements
nomenclature
Planning Inspectorate
Infrastructure Planning Commission
Planning Act 2008
Localism Act 2011
Secretary of State
Planning Inspectorate

Sizewell
Sizewell B
Electric Lighting Act 1909
Town and Country Planning Act
Heathrow Terminal 5

Galloper offshore wind farm
Galloper offshore wind farm
monopile foundation
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Localism Act 2011
royal assent
"Thames Tideway Tunnel"
"National Infrastructure Planning"
"Development Consent Orders"
Campaign to Protect Rural England
"E . The Town and Country Planning (Grants) Regulations, 1950"
Harvard University Press

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.