Knowledge (XXG)

Board of Inland Revenue v Haddock

Source 📝

148:
be written on notepaper. He said he had "drawn cheques on the backs of menus, on napkins, on handkerchiefs, on the labels of wine bottles; all these cheques had been duly honoured by his bank and passed through the Bankers' Clearing House". He thought that there was no distinction in law between a cheque on a napkin and a cheque on a cow.
147:
He testified that he had tendered a cheque in payment of income tax. A cheque was only an order to a bank to pay money to the person in possession of the cheque or a person named on the cheque, and there was nothing in law to say it must be on paper of specified dimensions. A cheque, he argued, could
158:
In relation to the criminal prosecution, Haddock said it was a nice thing if in the heart of the commercial capital of the world a man could not convey a negotiable instrument down the street without being arrested. If a disturbance was caused by a crowd, the policeman should arrest the crowd, not
89:
The case involved a Mr Albert Haddock, often an ingenious litigant in Herbert's writing. In this case, Haddock had been in disagreement with the Collector of Taxes over the size of his tax bill. Haddock complained that the sum was excessive, particularly in view of the inadequate
33: 295:
Another A. P. Herbert "misleading case" concerns "The egg of exchange". The question there was whether a cheque written on an egg could be paid into a bank, given the risk of the egg breaking or going bad. It was suggested that the cheque could be boiled.
307:
on 14 July 2004. In this, Mr. Haddock successfully argued that, during a period when judges had their salaries reduced by 30% because of financial emergency, they could not hear cases relating to the Inland Revenue because they had a
130:
Sir Joshua informed the court that the collector did try to endorse the cheque on its back, in this case on the abdomen. However, Sir Joshua explained: "he cow ... appeared to resent endorsement and adopted a menacing posture."
122:
confirmed that a two-penny stamp was affixed to the dexter horn of the cow. The collector declined the cow, objecting that it would be impossible to pay it into a bank account. Haddock suggested that he
162:
The judge, sympathetic to Haddock, found in his favour on the tax claim and prosecution for causing a disturbance. By tendering and being refused the cow, the other parties were
482:
A commonly cited example is tax protests in the United Kingdom in the 1970s when taxpayers would print their cheques on rigid boards measuring approximately 3 feet by 1½ feet.
151:
When asked as to motive, he said he had not a piece of paper to hand. Horses and other animals used to be seen frequently in the streets of London. He admitted on
287:
can be written on any durable material, including the horn of a cow. If the horn is still attached to the cow, the husband must give the wife the whole cow.
392: 273: 494: 97:
Haddock appeared at the offices of the Collector of Taxes and delivered a white cow "of malevolent aspect". On the cow was stencilled in red ink:
208:
observed: "The circumstances which gave rise to the case before us are, in terms of its genesis, reminiscent of those described in the case of
241:) published an article on the case in 1967, assuming it to have been factual. This was reported in the introduction to a later edition of 532: 614: 571: 155:
that he may have had in his mind an idea to ridicule the taxman. "But why not? There is no law against ridiculing the income tax."
253:
Negotiable instruments and other legal documents have been written on unusual surfaces. Documented cases provide illustrations of
440: 91: 554: 227: 599: 94:
he believed that he received from that Government in service. Eventually the Collector demanded £57 and 10 shillings.
528: 104:
Pay the Collector of Taxes, who is no gentleman, or Order, the sum of fifty seven pounds £57/0/0 (and may he rot!)
134:
The collector abandoned the attempt and declined to take the cheque. Haddock led the cow away and was arrested in
205: 127:
the cow to a third party to whom he might owe money, adding that "there must be many persons in that position".
584: 384: 268:
into the tractor's fender. The fender was probated and stood as his will, and is currently on display at the
604: 483: 284: 223: 238: 230:, "must be inanimate: neither a person nor A. P. Herbert's 'negotiable cow' can constitute a document." 124: 309: 351: 217:
Victor Chandeler International Ltd v The Commissioners of Custom and Excise and Teletext Limited
177:
was dramatised for BBC television as "The Negotiable Cow" as the opening of the first series of
32: 264:
An often-cited example is a Canadian farmer who, while trapped under his own tractor, carved a
548: 152: 119: 363: 265: 135: 63: 609: 515: 220: 304: 593: 343: 59: 448: 579: 414: 186: 78: 42: 269: 197:
Although the case is fictitious, it has been referred to in judicial decisions.
182: 254: 115: 17: 114:
During the hearing, the fictitious judge, Sir Basil String, enquired whether
328: 512: 163: 111:
Haddock tendered the cow in payment of his bill and demanded a receipt.
505: 280: 508: 258: 138:
for causing an obstruction, leading to the co-joined criminal case,
31: 473:(1926) 43 TLR 71. The will was rejected from probate. 58:) is a fictitious legal case written by the humorist 495:The Last Will and Testament of Cecil George Harris 261:being written on a variety of strange surfaces. 118:had been paid. The prosecutor, Sir Joshua Hoot 99: 226:stated that a document, in the context of the 338: 336: 8: 391:. New York. UPI. 31 July 1967. p. A-8. 77:(Methuen, 1930). The case evolved into an 274:University of Saskatchewan College of Law 73:. It was first published in book form in 102:To the London and Literary Bank, Limited 321: 75:More Misleading Cases in the Common Law 546: 257:on the side of empty egg-shells, and 7: 299:Yet another "misleading case", also 493:On Campus News, January 23, 2009: 585:Excerpt from the Texas bar website 395:from the original on 25 April 2023 228:Betting and Gaming Duties Act 1981 210:Board of Inland Revenue v. Haddock 175:Board of Inland Revenue v. Haddock 71:Misleading Cases in the Common Law 25: 385:"A Check Can Be Written on a Cow" 51:Board of Inland Revenue v Haddock 572:Excerpt of the article from the 221:[1999] EWHC 214 (Ch) 179:A. P. Herbert's Misleading Cases 329:A.P. Herbert's Misleading Cases 303:, was cited in a debate in the 166:from then demanding it later. 1: 580:Urban legends reference page 403:– via Newspapers.com. 237:(formerly published by the 631: 249:Comparable real life cases 204:(2002) at paragraph 1 the 615:Cattle in popular culture 364:373 Md. 672; 821 A.2d. 22 206:Maryland Court of Appeals 202:Messing v Bank of America 69:as part of his series of 553:: CS1 maint: location ( 529:"House of Lords Hansard" 301:Inland Revenue v Haddock 291:Similar fictional cases 215:In the English case of 189:as Mr Justice Swallow. 389:Memphis Press-Scimitar 235:Memphis Press-Scimitar 185:as Albert Haddock and 109: 46: 239:E. W. Scripps Company 170:Television adaptation 35: 27:Fictitious legal case 451:on 24 November 2017 224:Mr Justice Lightman 85:Summary of the case 600:Fictional lawsuits 421:. 31 December 1998 56:the negotiable cow 47: 533:Stationery Office 441:"chose in action" 350:, Great Britain: 310:personal interest 153:cross-examination 16:(Redirected from 622: 574:Hong Kong lawyer 559: 558: 552: 544: 542: 540: 525: 519: 503: 497: 491: 485: 480: 474: 467: 461: 460: 458: 456: 447:. Archived from 437: 431: 430: 428: 426: 411: 405: 404: 402: 400: 381: 375: 374:At paragraph 11. 372: 366: 361: 355: 354: 344:Herbert, Alan P. 340: 331: 326: 312:in the outcome. 266:holographic will 233:The now defunct 136:Trafalgar Square 36:The case of the 21: 630: 629: 625: 624: 623: 621: 620: 619: 590: 589: 568: 563: 562: 545: 538: 536: 527: 526: 522: 504: 500: 492: 488: 481: 477: 471:Hodson v Barnes 468: 464: 454: 452: 439: 438: 434: 424: 422: 413: 412: 408: 398: 396: 383: 382: 378: 373: 369: 362: 358: 342: 341: 334: 327: 323: 318: 293: 251: 195: 172: 108: 106:ALBERT HADDOCK 105: 103: 87: 54:(also known as 38:negotiable cow, 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 628: 626: 618: 617: 612: 607: 602: 592: 591: 588: 587: 582: 577: 567: 566:External links 564: 561: 560: 535:. 14 July 2004 520: 514:. See also BT 498: 486: 475: 462: 445:Sixth Form Law 432: 406: 376: 367: 356: 332: 320: 319: 317: 314: 305:House of Lords 292: 289: 250: 247: 194: 191: 181:in 1967, with 171: 168: 100: 86: 83: 26: 24: 18:Negotiable cow 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 627: 616: 613: 611: 608: 606: 605:Urban legends 603: 601: 598: 597: 595: 586: 583: 581: 578: 576: 575: 570: 569: 565: 556: 550: 534: 530: 524: 521: 517: 513: 510: 507: 502: 499: 496: 490: 487: 484: 479: 476: 472: 466: 463: 450: 446: 442: 436: 433: 420: 416: 410: 407: 394: 390: 386: 380: 377: 371: 368: 365: 360: 357: 353: 349: 345: 339: 337: 333: 330: 325: 322: 315: 313: 311: 306: 302: 297: 290: 288: 286: 282: 277: 275: 271: 267: 262: 260: 256: 248: 246: 244: 240: 236: 231: 229: 225: 222: 218: 213: 211: 207: 203: 198: 192: 190: 188: 184: 180: 176: 169: 167: 165: 160: 156: 154: 149: 145: 143: 142: 137: 132: 128: 126: 121: 117: 112: 107: 98: 95: 93: 92:consideration 84: 82: 80: 76: 72: 68: 66: 61: 60:A. P. Herbert 57: 53: 52: 45: 44: 40:collected in 39: 34: 30: 19: 573: 537:. Retrieved 523: 501: 489: 478: 470: 465: 455:30 September 453:. Retrieved 449:the original 444: 435: 425:30 September 423:. Retrieved 418: 409: 397:. Retrieved 388: 379: 370: 359: 348:Uncommon Law 347: 324: 300: 298: 294: 278: 263: 252: 243:Uncommon Law 242: 234: 232: 216: 214: 209: 201: 199: 196: 187:Alastair Sim 178: 174: 173: 161: 157: 150: 146: 140: 139: 133: 129: 113: 110: 101: 96: 88: 79:urban legend 74: 70: 64: 55: 50: 49: 48: 43:Uncommon Law 41: 37: 29: 531:. (pt 23): 270:law library 183:Roy Dotrice 141:R v Haddock 594:Categories 509:Gittin 2.3 415:"Cash Cow" 281:Jewish law 116:stamp duty 539:26 August 316:Footnotes 193:Citations 549:cite web 399:25 April 393:Archived 346:(1935), 164:estopped 67:magazine 506:Mishnah 352:Methuen 272:of the 259:cheques 125:endorse 610:Humour 518:15a-b. 516:Eruvin 419:Snopes 255:wills 219: 159:him. 65:Punch 555:link 541:2010 469:See 457:2019 427:2019 401:2023 62:for 285:get 279:In 212:." 200:In 596:: 551:}} 547:{{ 443:. 417:. 387:. 335:^ 283:a 276:. 245:. 144:. 120:KC 81:. 557:) 543:. 511:, 459:. 429:. 20:)

Index

Negotiable cow

Uncommon Law
A. P. Herbert
Punch magazine
urban legend
consideration
stamp duty
KC
endorse
Trafalgar Square
cross-examination
estopped
Roy Dotrice
Alastair Sim
Maryland Court of Appeals
[1999] EWHC 214 (Ch)
Mr Justice Lightman
Betting and Gaming Duties Act 1981
E. W. Scripps Company
wills
cheques
holographic will
law library
University of Saskatchewan College of Law
Jewish law
get
House of Lords
personal interest
A.P. Herbert's Misleading Cases

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.