Knowledge (XXG)

No. 106 fuze

Source 📝

54: 40: 20: 30: 140:
fuze: simple deceleration or change of direction would not activate it, only direct physical contact between the hammer projecting from the nose and an external object. The basic mechanism was a steel hammer on the end of a spindle projecting forward from the nose of the fuze. The slightest movement inwards of this spindle caused the fuze to detonate and hence explode the shell before it penetrated the ground.
152:
fuze body forced the tape wrapped around the spindle against the underside of the hammer head, preventing the tape from unwinding. When acceleration ceased shortly after the shell left the gun barrel, the hammer and fuze body were travelling at the same speed and the hammer ceased to "set back", freeing the tape. The shell's rotation then caused a weight on the end of the tape to unwind the tape through
278:"Compared with the French 75-mm H.E. which gave instantaneous effect on graze or burst very soon after ricochet, the British 18-pdr. H.E. shell that buried themselves on graze or burst from 10 to 15 ft. in the air after ricochet were comparatively valueless for wire-cutting". History of the Ministry of Munitions Volume X Part II, page 5, on the situation in early 1916. 106:
limited sensitivity: they could not detect contact with a frail object like barbed wire or soft ground surface. Hence they would penetrate objects or ground slightly before detonating, instead of on the ground surface as required for wire cutting. These graze and impact fuzes continued to be used as intended for medium and heavy artillery high-explosive shells.
287:"Authority was given to replace No. 100-type fuse by No. 106 in a large proportion of the medium shell and to adopt it in certain heavy natures between August and November 1916, but there was considerable delay before the new fuse was produced in large numbers". History of Ministry of Munitions, Volume X, Part V, page 48 97:), intended to burst above head-height for anti-personnel use. British heavy artillery was expected to attack fortifications, requiring high-explosive shells to penetrate the target to some extent before exploding. Hence British artillery fuzes were optimised for these functions. Experiences of trench warfare on the 125:
for cutting barbed-wire defences. The disadvantage of shrapnel for this purpose was that it relied on extreme accuracy on setting the fuze timing to burst the shell close to the ground just in front of the wire: if the shell burst fractionally too short or too long it could not cut the wire, and also
101:
in 1914–1916 indicated that British artillery was unable to reliably destroy barbed-wire barricades, which required shells to explode instantaneously on contact with the wire or ground surface: British high-explosive shells would penetrate the ground before exploding, rendering them useless for
159:
After the tape detached during flight, the hammer was prevented from being forced inward by air resistance by a thin "shearing wire" passing through the hammer spindle, which was easily broken by the hammer encountering any physical resistance. The spindle was prevented from rotating relative to the
139:
The number 106 fuze drew on French technology to provide a mechanism for reliably detonating a high-explosive shell instantaneously when the nose made physical contact with the slightest object like a strand of barbed wire or the ground surface. Hence it was a "direct action" rather than a "graze"
151:
The first safety mechanism was a length of brass tape wrapped around the spindle between the fuze body and the hammer head, which prevented the spindle from moving inward. On firing, the hammer's inertia caused it to "setback" fractionally i.e. it resisted acceleration, and hence the accelerating
105:
British No. 100 and later Nos. 101, 102 and 103 nose "graze" fuzes available in the field from August 1915 onwards could explode a high-explosive shell very quickly on experiencing a major change in direction or velocity, but were not "instantaneous": there was still some delay in activation, and
164:
firing, the shutter resisted acceleration ("setback") and the accelerating shell body pushed against it, preventing the shutter from moving. When acceleration ceased shortly after the shell left the gun barrel, the shutter ceased to "set back" and was free to spin outwards, activating the fuze.
163:
Later versions (designated "E") incorporated an additional safety mechanism: an internal "shutter", also activated by rotation of the shell after firing, which closed the channel between the striker in the nose and the powder magazine in the base until it was clear of the gun which fired it. On
156:, hence activating the fuze. Because of this, usage of this fuze in action was characterised by British troops in the front lines noticing the descending tapes detached from the fuzes as they travelled overhead towards the enemy lines. 242:
and six-inch field guns were targeted on enemy artillery, and by bursting above ground could cause maximum damage to enemy artillery, mountings and crew. It was also approved as the primary fuze for high-explosive shells for
176:
in late 1916, and entered service in early 1917. From then onwards British forces had a reliable means of detonating high-explosive shells on the ground surface without merely digging holes as they had previously.
126:
the spherical shrapnel balls were not of an optimal shape for cutting strands of wire. While the 2-inch mortar bombs cut wire effectively, their maximum range of 570 yards (520 m) limited their usefulness.
208:
Hammer encounters physical resistance (e.g. earth, rocks, wire) and decelerates, causing the momentum of the fuze body to snap the shearing wire and force the detonator onto the pointed end of the hammer
143:
The steel hammer had a softer aluminium cap which absorbed the force of a glancing blow and prevented the spindle from bending or breaking, reducing the risk of misfire.
335:
Official History of the Ministry of Munitions, 1922. Volume X : The Supply of Munitions. Facsimile reprint by Imperial War Museum and Naval & Military Press
386: 253:
There were many versions of the No. 106 and it remained in service in the form of its streamlined variant, the No. 115, until World War II.
34:
Later No. 106 E Mk IV with safety shutter, showing before use, before firing, during flight and on impact, and action of tape and shutter
238:
6-inch field guns at long range. Its instantaneous action also made it useful for counter-battery fire: high-explosive shells fired by
340: 330: 199:
Fuze continues to spin between 1,300 and 1,700 revolutions per minute: safety shutter spins out ("E" models from 1917 onwards)
187:
Fuze accelerates violently on firing: the setback of the hammer prevents tape from unwinding while still in or near gun barrel
269:
Ministry of Munitions History 1922. Volume X The Supply of Munitions. Part V: Gun Ammunition Filling and Completing. Page 55.
212:
Detonator explodes, sending flame through the centre of the fuze body to C.E. (composition exploding) magazine in fuze base
160:
fuze body in flight, and hence from snapping the shearing wire, by a guide pin passing through a cutout in the spindle.
223: 98: 226:
in 1917 and 1918, the No. 106 fuze was typically employed on high-explosive shells for cutting barbed wire, fired by
308:
Farndale 1986 page 158, quoting War Office Artillery Notes No. 4 - Artillery in Offensive Operations, January 1917.
231: 325:, History of the Royal Regiment of Artillery. Western Front 1914–18. London: Royal Artillery Institution, 1986. 227: 118: 94: 90: 62: 58: 53: 45: 39: 244: 235: 122: 173: 110: 336: 326: 202: 153: 196:
Fuze exits gun barrel and ceases accelerating: the hammer ceases to setback, freeing up tape
322: 205:
of weight on the end of the tape causes tape to unwind and detach from the hammer spindle
381: 353: 114: 86: 74: 19: 29: 375: 239: 172:
The fuze was first used experimentally in action in the later phases of the
77:, first tested in action in late 1916 and deployed in volume in early 1917. 180:
The chain of events necessary to allow the fuze to activate a shell were:
190: 52: 38: 218:
Flame activates shell function, typically high-explosive or smoke
193:
in gun barrel causes the shell and hence fuze to spin rapidly
299:
History of Ministry of Munitions, Volume X, Part V, page 56
215:
C.E. magazine detonates, sending flame into the shell nose
24:
Early model No. 106 Mk II, without safety shutter, 1917
184:
Gunner removes the fuze's safety cap before loading
85:Britain entered World War I with a policy of using 354:"Chapperton Down Artillery School [film]" 250:This fuze was also used to burst smoke shells. 73:was the first British instantaneous percussion 16:British instantaneous percussion artillery fuze 8: 121:and spherical high-explosive bombs fired by 295: 293: 65:, with 106 Mk II fuze with safety cap on 28: 18: 262: 7: 48:shell, 106 Mk II fuze and safety cap 360:. Imperial War Museum. 10:05:25:00 113:in 1916, British forces relied on 14: 230:at short to medium range, and by 387:Artillery of the United Kingdom 1: 123:2-inch "plum-pudding" mortars 102:destroying surface targets. 403: 358:film.iwmcollections.org.uk 147:Arming and safety features 247:from August 1916 onward. 109:Up to and including the 66: 50: 36: 26: 245:QF 4.5 inch howitzers 228:18-pounder field guns 119:18-pounder field guns 56: 42: 32: 22: 257:Notes and references 135:Detonation mechanism 89:for its field guns ( 63:18-pounder field gun 174:Battle of the Somme 111:Battle of the Somme 67: 51: 37: 27: 203:Centrifugal force 154:centrifugal force 394: 369: 367: 365: 309: 306: 300: 297: 288: 285: 279: 276: 270: 267: 402: 401: 397: 396: 395: 393: 392: 391: 372: 371: 363: 361: 351: 349: 323:Martin Farndale 318: 313: 312: 307: 303: 298: 291: 286: 282: 277: 273: 268: 264: 259: 170: 149: 137: 132: 115:shrapnel shells 87:shrapnel shells 83: 71:number 106 fuze 49: 35: 25: 17: 12: 11: 5: 400: 398: 390: 389: 384: 374: 373: 348: 347:External links 345: 344: 343: 333: 317: 314: 311: 310: 301: 289: 280: 271: 261: 260: 258: 255: 220: 219: 216: 213: 210: 206: 200: 197: 194: 188: 185: 169: 166: 148: 145: 136: 133: 131: 128: 82: 79: 75:artillery fuze 43: 33: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 399: 388: 385: 383: 380: 379: 377: 370: 359: 355: 346: 342: 341:1-84734-884-X 338: 334: 332: 331:1-870114-00-0 328: 324: 320: 319: 315: 305: 302: 296: 294: 290: 284: 281: 275: 272: 266: 263: 256: 254: 251: 248: 246: 241: 237: 233: 229: 225: 224:Western Front 217: 214: 211: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 182: 181: 178: 175: 168:Use in action 167: 165: 161: 157: 155: 146: 144: 141: 134: 129: 127: 124: 120: 116: 112: 107: 103: 100: 99:Western front 96: 92: 88: 80: 78: 76: 72: 64: 60: 55: 47: 41: 31: 21: 362:. Retrieved 357: 352:War Office. 350: 321:General Sir 316:Bibliography 304: 283: 274: 265: 252: 249: 221: 179: 171: 162: 158: 150: 142: 138: 108: 104: 84: 70: 68: 44:Unassembled 376:Categories 364:1 November 240:60-pounder 95:18-pounder 91:13-pounder 81:Background 46:18-pounder 117:fired by 57:Complete 222:On the 209:spindle 191:Rifling 339:  329:  236:Mk XIX 232:Mk VII 130:Design 382:Fuzes 59:round 366:2013 337:ISBN 327:ISBN 234:and 93:and 69:The 61:for 378:: 356:. 292:^ 368:.

Index




18-pounder

round
18-pounder field gun
artillery fuze
shrapnel shells
13-pounder
18-pounder
Western front
Battle of the Somme
shrapnel shells
18-pounder field guns
2-inch "plum-pudding" mortars
centrifugal force
Battle of the Somme
Rifling
Centrifugal force
Western Front
18-pounder field guns
Mk VII
Mk XIX
60-pounder
QF 4.5 inch howitzers


Martin Farndale
ISBN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.