Knowledge

Nonfirstorderizability

Source 📝

25: 556: 293: 360: 810: 157: 94:
if and only if the statement holds in that model. Nonfirstorderizable statements are sometimes presented as evidence that first-order logic is not adequate to capture the nuances of meaning in natural language.
875: 106:
symbolization, which can be interpreted as plural quantification over the same domain as first-order quantifiers use, without postulation of distinct "second-order objects" (
351: 697:
which is true of all and only models with finite domains. In other words, there is no first-order formula which can express "there is only a finite number of things".
43: 741: 671: 551:{\displaystyle \exists X(\exists x,y(Xx\land Xy\land (y=x+1\lor x=y+1))\land \exists x\neg Xx\land \forall x\,\forall y(Xx\land (y=x+1\lor x=y+1)\rightarrow Xy))} 673:
were added to the Peano axioms, it would mean that there were no non-standard models of the augmented axioms. However, the usual argument for the
297:
That this formula has no first-order equivalent can be seen by turning it into a formula in the language of arithmetic . Substitute the formula
677:
would still go through, proving that there are non-standard models after all. This is a contradiction, so we can conclude that no such formula
900:
formulae in the subset. Applying the compactness theorem, the entire infinite set must also have a model. Because of what we assumed about
1105: 102:
in his paper "To Be is to Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables)". Quine argued that such sentences call for
288:{\displaystyle \exists X(\exists x,y(Xx\land Xy\land Axy)\land \exists x\neg Xx\land \forall x\,\forall y(Xx\land Axy\rightarrow Xy))} 1052: 61: 815: 674: 628: 1123: 631:
otherwise. Therefore, the formula given above is true only in non-standard models, because, in the standard model, the set
812:
which expresses that there are at least three distinct elements in the domain. Consider the infinite set of formulae
129: 984: 1068: 1044: 974: 107: 979: 929: 147: 969: 936: 947: 708:
which is true in all and only models with finite domains. We can express, for any positive integer
701: 300: 1024: 951: 103: 1007:(August 1984). "To Be Is to Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables)". 904:, the model must be finite. However, this model cannot be finite, because if the model has only 1048: 940: 694: 151: 83: 1016: 653: 82:
is the inability of a natural-language statement to be adequately captured by a formula of
1100: 1138: 1132: 1040: 1004: 964: 877:
Every finite subset of these formulae has a model: given a subset, find the greatest
99: 616: 91: 75: 805:{\displaystyle \exists x\exists y\exists z(x\neq y\wedge x\neq z\wedge y\neq z)} 646:
Let us assume that there is a first-order rendering of the above formula called
125: 1096: 1028: 1020: 932:
cannot be defined in first-order languages, merely indiscernibility.
1124:
Printer-friendly CSS, and nonfirstorderisability by Terence Tao
90:
if there is no formula of first-order logic which is true in a
18: 939:
that may be used to identify the real numbers among the
915:. This contradiction shows that there can be no formula 888:
is in the subset. Then a model with a domain containing
39: 720:, call the formula expressing that there are at least 303: 818: 744: 656: 363: 160: 643:
satisfying the formula in every non-standard model.
34:
may be too technical for most readers to understand
869: 804: 665: 615:A model of a formal theory of arithmetic, such as 550: 345: 287: 623:if it only contains the familiar natural numbers 150:is the set of all critics, then a reasonable 134:: "Some critics admire only one another." If 8: 896:(because the domain is finite) and all the 870:{\displaystyle A,B_{2},B_{3},B_{4},\ldots } 1095:Noonan, Harold; Curtis, Ben (2014-04-25). 908:elements, it does not satisfy the formula 572:There is a number that does not belong to 954:cannot be expressed in first-order logic. 855: 842: 829: 817: 743: 655: 475: 362: 302: 242: 159: 62:Learn how and when to remove this message 46:, without removing the technical details. 996: 704:as follows. Suppose there is a formula 716:elements in the domain". For a given 44:make it understandable to non-experts 7: 1106:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 712:, the sentence "there are at least 635:must contain all available numbers 757: 751: 745: 657: 566:There are at least two numbers in 476: 469: 457: 451: 373: 364: 243: 236: 224: 218: 170: 161: 14: 1076:. Open Logic Project. p. 235 627:as elements. The model is called 675:existence of non-standard models 86:. Specifically, a statement is 23: 695:first-order logic with equality 919:with the property we assumed. 799: 763: 639:. In addition, there is a set 545: 542: 533: 530: 494: 482: 445: 442: 406: 385: 370: 346:{\textstyle (y=x+1\lor x=y+1)} 340: 304: 282: 279: 270: 249: 212: 182: 167: 1: 681:exists in first-order logic. 580:does not contain all numbers. 617:first-order Peano arithmetic 154:into second order logic is: 731:. For example, the formula 558:states that there is a set 152:translation of the sentence 1155: 123:A standard example is the 1009:The Journal of Philosophy 985:Reification (linguistics) 1045:Harvard University Press 685:Finiteness of the domain 1037:Logic, Logic, and Logic 1035:Boolos, George (1998). 700:This is implied by the 562:with these properties: 138:is understood to mean " 98:The term was coined by 16:Concept in formal logic 975:Generalized quantifier 892:elements will satisfy 881:for which the formula 871: 806: 667: 666:{\displaystyle \neg E} 552: 347: 289: 80:nonfirstorderizability 980:Plural quantification 872: 807: 668: 553: 348: 290: 148:universe of discourse 119:Geach-Kaplan sentence 970:Branching quantifier 937:Archimedean property 816: 742: 689:There is no formula 654: 361: 301: 158: 948:compactness theorem 702:compactness theorem 88:nonfirstorderizable 1070:Intermediate Logic 952:graph connectivity 941:real closed fields 867: 802: 663: 548: 343: 285: 84:first-order logic 72: 71: 64: 1146: 1111: 1110: 1101:Zalta, Edward N. 1092: 1086: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1075: 1065: 1059: 1058: 1032: 1001: 918: 914: 907: 903: 899: 895: 891: 887: 880: 876: 874: 873: 868: 860: 859: 847: 846: 834: 833: 811: 809: 808: 803: 737: 730: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 692: 680: 672: 670: 669: 664: 649: 642: 638: 634: 626: 610: 607:also belongs to 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 579: 575: 569: 561: 557: 555: 554: 549: 352: 350: 349: 344: 294: 292: 291: 286: 67: 60: 56: 53: 47: 27: 26: 19: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1129: 1128: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1079: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1055: 1034: 1021:10.2307/2026308 1003: 1002: 998: 993: 961: 928:The concept of 925: 916: 913: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 886: 882: 878: 851: 838: 825: 814: 813: 740: 739: 736: 732: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 690: 687: 678: 652: 651: 647: 640: 636: 632: 624: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 577: 573: 567: 559: 359: 358: 357:. The result, 299: 298: 156: 155: 121: 116: 110:, sets, etc.). 68: 57: 51: 48: 40:help improve it 37: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1152: 1150: 1142: 1141: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1119: 1118:External links 1116: 1113: 1112: 1087: 1060: 1053: 1015:(8): 430–449. 1005:Boolos, George 995: 994: 992: 989: 988: 987: 982: 977: 972: 967: 960: 957: 956: 955: 944: 933: 924: 923:Other examples 921: 911: 884: 866: 863: 858: 854: 850: 845: 841: 837: 832: 828: 824: 821: 801: 798: 795: 792: 789: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 734: 727: 686: 683: 662: 659: 613: 612: 581: 570: 547: 544: 541: 538: 535: 532: 529: 526: 523: 520: 517: 514: 511: 508: 505: 502: 499: 496: 493: 490: 487: 484: 481: 478: 474: 471: 468: 465: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 438: 435: 432: 429: 426: 423: 420: 417: 414: 411: 408: 405: 402: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 384: 381: 378: 375: 372: 369: 366: 342: 339: 336: 333: 330: 327: 324: 321: 318: 315: 312: 309: 306: 284: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 266: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 220: 217: 214: 211: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 120: 117: 115: 112: 70: 69: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1151: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1108: 1107: 1102: 1098: 1091: 1088: 1072: 1071: 1064: 1061: 1056: 1054:0-674-53767-X 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041:Cambridge, MA 1038: 1033:Reprinted in 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1000: 997: 990: 986: 983: 981: 978: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 965:Definable set 963: 962: 958: 953: 950:implies that 949: 945: 942: 938: 934: 931: 927: 926: 922: 920: 864: 861: 856: 852: 848: 843: 839: 835: 830: 826: 822: 819: 796: 793: 790: 787: 784: 781: 778: 775: 772: 769: 766: 760: 754: 748: 703: 698: 696: 684: 682: 676: 660: 644: 630: 622: 618: 582: 571: 565: 564: 563: 539: 536: 527: 524: 521: 518: 515: 512: 509: 506: 503: 500: 497: 491: 488: 485: 479: 472: 466: 463: 460: 454: 448: 439: 436: 433: 430: 427: 424: 421: 418: 415: 412: 409: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 382: 379: 376: 367: 356: 337: 334: 331: 328: 325: 322: 319: 316: 313: 310: 307: 295: 276: 273: 267: 264: 261: 258: 255: 252: 246: 239: 233: 230: 227: 221: 215: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 179: 176: 173: 164: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 131: 127: 118: 113: 111: 109: 105: 101: 100:George Boolos 96: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 66: 63: 55: 45: 41: 35: 32:This article 30: 21: 20: 1104: 1090: 1078:. Retrieved 1069: 1063: 1036: 1012: 1008: 999: 699: 688: 645: 637:0, 1, 2, ... 629:non-standard 625:0, 1, 2, ... 620: 619:, is called 614: 583:If a number 354: 296: 143: 139: 135: 124: 122: 104:second-order 97: 87: 79: 76:formal logic 73: 58: 49: 33: 587:belongs to 146:," and the 1097:"Identity" 991:References 108:properties 52:March 2016 865:… 794:≠ 788:∧ 782:≠ 776:∧ 770:≠ 758:∃ 752:∃ 746:∃ 724:elements 658:¬ 534:→ 513:∨ 492:∧ 477:∀ 470:∀ 467:∧ 458:¬ 452:∃ 449:∧ 425:∨ 404:∧ 395:∧ 374:∃ 365:∃ 323:∨ 271:→ 259:∧ 244:∀ 237:∀ 234:∧ 225:¬ 219:∃ 216:∧ 201:∧ 192:∧ 171:∃ 162:∃ 1133:Category 1080:21 March 959:See also 930:identity 621:standard 142:admires 132:sentence 114:Examples 1103:(ed.). 1029:2026308 576:, i.e. 38:Please 1051:  1027:  130:Kaplan 1139:Logic 1099:. In 1074:(PDF) 1025:JSTOR 650:. If 601:x - 1 597:x + 1 126:Geach 92:model 1082:2022 1049:ISBN 946:The 935:The 738:is: 591:and 353:for 1017:doi 912:m+1 693:in 599:or 595:is 355:Axy 136:Axy 74:In 42:to 1135:: 1047:. 1043:: 1039:. 1023:. 1013:81 1011:. 603:, 78:, 1109:. 1084:. 1057:. 1031:. 1019:: 943:. 917:A 910:B 906:m 902:A 898:B 894:A 890:n 885:n 883:B 879:n 862:, 857:4 853:B 849:, 844:3 840:B 836:, 831:2 827:B 823:, 820:A 800:) 797:z 791:y 785:z 779:x 773:y 767:x 764:( 761:z 755:y 749:x 735:3 733:B 728:n 726:B 722:n 718:n 714:n 710:n 706:A 691:A 679:E 661:E 648:E 641:X 633:X 611:. 609:X 605:y 593:y 589:X 585:x 578:X 574:X 568:X 560:X 546:) 543:) 540:y 537:X 531:) 528:1 525:+ 522:y 519:= 516:x 510:1 507:+ 504:x 501:= 498:y 495:( 489:x 486:X 483:( 480:y 473:x 464:x 461:X 455:x 446:) 443:) 440:1 437:+ 434:y 431:= 428:x 422:1 419:+ 416:x 413:= 410:y 407:( 401:y 398:X 392:x 389:X 386:( 383:y 380:, 377:x 371:( 368:X 341:) 338:1 335:+ 332:y 329:= 326:x 320:1 317:+ 314:x 311:= 308:y 305:( 283:) 280:) 277:y 274:X 268:y 265:x 262:A 256:x 253:X 250:( 247:y 240:x 231:x 228:X 222:x 213:) 210:y 207:x 204:A 198:y 195:X 189:x 186:X 183:( 180:y 177:, 174:x 168:( 165:X 144:y 140:x 128:– 65:) 59:( 54:) 50:( 36:.

Index

help improve it
make it understandable to non-experts
Learn how and when to remove this message
formal logic
first-order logic
model
George Boolos
second-order
properties
Geach
Kaplan
universe of discourse
translation of the sentence
first-order Peano arithmetic
non-standard
existence of non-standard models
first-order logic with equality
compactness theorem
identity
Archimedean property
real closed fields
compactness theorem
graph connectivity
Definable set
Branching quantifier
Generalized quantifier
Plural quantification
Reification (linguistics)
Boolos, George
doi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.