Knowledge (XXG)

On-sale bar

Source 📝

129:
adversarial setting, so even if an invention was far too premature to have been put into a patent application, with details missing, it may still be deemed to have been "ready for patenting." Moreover, an inadequate disclosure cannot provide priority for a continuation-in-part application, so an inventor who fears the on-sale bar and files a premature patent application may not be able to rescue it later.
124:
are method claims. The normal standard of reduction to practice (which requires recognizing the invention) has been ignored in several cases, for example an offer for sale of a waste disposal machine which, if accepted would have practiced a later invention due to the special nature of the waste, was
119:
The on-sale bar is an extraordinarily (some would argue needlessly) complex body of patent law in all but the simplest cases. For instance, licenses are normally not considered a sale, even when a sample product is transferred as part of the license, but a computer software license is considered a
128:
There is no joint-development exception to the on-sale bar, meaning that the on-sale bar in many cases is triggered when the invention is "ready for patenting," which can occur when an inventor is working alone at a drafting table. The ready-for-patenting standard is judged retrospectively in an
67:
An impermissible sale has occurred if there was a definite sale, or offer to sell, more than 1 year before the effective filing date of the U.S. application and the subject matter of the sale, or offer to sell, fully anticipated the claimed invention or would have rendered the claimed invention
48:(a) Novelty; Prior Art.— A person shall be entitled to a patent unless— (1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention... 29: 227: 83: 105: 116:('UCC') to define whether a communication or series of communications rises to the level of a commercial offer for sale."). 96:
Traditional contract law principles are applied when determining whether a commercial offer for sale has occurred. See
206: 125:
considered a barring sale even though the invention had not even been conceived yet and the sale did not take place.
17: 113: 112:, 254 F.3d 1041,1047, 59 USPQ2d 1121, 1126 (Fed. Cir. 2001) ("As a general proposition, we will look to the 88:, 525 U.S. 55, 67, 48 USPQ2d 1641, 1646-47 (1998). Ready for patenting means either that the invention was 211: 163:"Revisiting the On-Sale Bar After Pfaff by Stephen Lindholm :: SSRN". Papers.ssrn.com. 2005-01-29. 89: 108:
2d 1225, 1229 (Fed. Cir. 2001), petition for cert. filed, 71 USLW 3093 (Jul. 03, 2002) (No. 02-39);
143: 176: 164: 168: 138: 189: 40:
cannot be patented if it has been for sale for over one year prior to the patent filing.
121: 79:
the subject of a commercial offer for sale not primarily for experimental purposes and
221: 25: 33: 207:
35 U.S.C. 102 Conditions for patentability; novelty and loss of right to patent.
37: 75:
The on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. 102(b) is triggered if the invention is both
99: 72:, Inc., 45 F.3d 1562, 1565, 33 USPQ2d 1512, 1514 (Fed. Cir. 1995). 52:MPEP 2133.03(b) "On Sale" - 2100 Patentability 8: 68:obvious by its addition to the prior art. 155: 110:Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc. 185: 174: 92:or that enabling disclosures existed. 7: 14: 212:MPEP 2133.03(b) "On Sale" [R-2 1: 85:Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc. 244: 104:, 275 F.3d 1040, 1048, 61 56:- 2100 Patentability": --> 120:barring sale even if the 228:United States patent law 18:United States patent law 114:Uniform Commercial Code 98:Linear Tech. Corp. v. 36:. It provides that an 82:ready for patenting. 214:- 2100 Patentability 144:Post-sale restraint 90:reduced to practice 44:35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) 24:is a limitation on 184:Missing or empty 70:Ferag AG v. Quipp 235: 194: 193: 187: 182: 180: 172: 160: 139:Novelty (patent) 64: 63: 59: 243: 242: 238: 237: 236: 234: 233: 232: 218: 217: 203: 198: 197: 183: 173: 162: 161: 157: 152: 135: 65: 61: 57: 55: 54: 46: 12: 11: 5: 241: 239: 231: 230: 220: 219: 216: 215: 209: 202: 201:External links 199: 196: 195: 154: 153: 151: 148: 147: 146: 141: 134: 131: 94: 93: 80: 53: 50: 45: 42: 30:35 U.S.C. 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 240: 229: 226: 225: 223: 213: 210: 208: 205: 204: 200: 191: 178: 170: 166: 159: 156: 149: 145: 142: 140: 137: 136: 132: 130: 126: 123: 122:patent claims 117: 115: 111: 107: 103: 101: 91: 87: 86: 81: 78: 77: 76: 73: 71: 60: 51: 49: 43: 41: 39: 35: 31: 27: 26:patentability 23: 19: 158: 127: 118: 109: 97: 95: 84: 74: 69: 66: 47: 28:codified at 21: 15: 22:on-sale bar 186:|url= 150:References 34:§ 102 38:invention 222:Category 177:cite web 133:See also 169:656243 167:  102:, Inc. 100:Micrel 32:  20:, the 190:help 165:SSRN 106:USPQ 58:edit 16:In 224:: 181:: 179:}} 175:{{ 192:) 188:( 171:. 62:]

Index

United States patent law
patentability
35 U.S.C.
§ 102
invention
Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc.
reduced to practice
Micrel
USPQ
Uniform Commercial Code
patent claims
Novelty (patent)
Post-sale restraint
SSRN
656243
cite web
help
35 U.S.C. 102 Conditions for patentability; novelty and loss of right to patent.
MPEP 2133.03(b) "On Sale" [R-2
Category
United States patent law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.