Knowledge (XXG)

Reduction to practice

Source 📝

232: 238: 162:
A provisional application for patent provides more benefits and protections to inventors than a disclosure document and can be used for the same purposes as a disclosure document if necessary. ... A non-provisional application must be filed within twelve months of the filing date of a provisional
153:
The Disclosure Document Program (DDP) was a USPTO program that allowed an inventor to file a preliminary description of his/her invention. The program was discontinued by the USPTO as of February 1, 2007, in favor of filing a
104:§2138.04 "Conception" ). "In some instances, such as the discovery of genes or chemicals, an inventor is unable to establish a conception until he has reduced the invention to practice through a successful experiment." 64: 55:
Conception is the "formation in the mind of the inventor, of a definite and permanent idea of the complete and operative invention, as it is hereafter to be applied in practice."
28:
beyond the conception thereof. Reduction to practice may be either actual (the invention is actually carried out and is found to work for its intended purpose) or constructive (a
100:"Simultaneous conception and reduction to practice": "On rare occasions conception and reduction to practice occur simultaneously in unpredictable technologies." (citing 281: 101: 300: 305: 274: 49: 33: 247: 17: 89:
Constructive reduction to practice: "ccurs upon the filing of a patent application on the claimed invention."
155: 41: 142: 267: 36:
is filed). The date of reduction to practice was critical to the determination of priority between
202: 191: 78:
Actual reduction to practice: "equires that the claimed invention work for its intended purpose."
29: 120:(Fed. Cir. 1991)). The court will apply this doctrine in so-called "unpredictable arts" such as 251: 231: 145:, several additional kinds of evidence can be used to establish an earlier priority date. 45: 163:
patent in order for the inventor to claim the benefit of the provisional application. ...
180: 294: 128:
where the invention is a "biologically active composition of matter," also called a "
117: 109: 94: 83: 60: 213: 129: 125: 25: 37: 121: 106:
The Regents of the University of California v. Synbiotics Co.
74:
The reduction to practice of an invention can either be:
255: 114:Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 275: 57:Hybritech Inc. v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc. 8: 282: 268: 173: 250:or its constituent jurisdictions is a 7: 227: 225: 24:is the step in the formation of an 254:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 236: 230: 1: 149:Disclosure Document Program 50:swearing behind a reference 322: 224: 67:1986) (quoting 1 Robinson 246:This article relating to 112:(S.D.Cal., 1994) (citing 301:United States patent law 248:law in the United States 18:United States patent law 306:United States law stubs 156:provisional application 91:Brunswick Corp. v. U.S. 80:Brunswick Corp. v. U.S. 44:under the discontinued 42:interference proceeding 165: 137:Some types of evidence 48:system as well as for 160: 34:sufficient disclosure 22:reduction to practice 110:849 F.Supp. 740, 742 95:34 Fed. Cl. 532, 584 84:34 Fed. Cl. 532, 584 158:. The USPTO says: 143:inventor's notebook 118:927 F.2d 1200, 1206 61:802 F.2d 1367, 1376 52:under that system. 141:In addition to an 30:patent application 263: 262: 313: 284: 277: 270: 242: 241: 240: 239: 234: 226: 216: 211: 205: 200: 194: 189: 183: 178: 321: 320: 316: 315: 314: 312: 311: 310: 291: 290: 289: 288: 237: 235: 229: 222: 220: 219: 212: 208: 201: 197: 190: 186: 179: 175: 170: 151: 139: 46:first-to-invent 12: 11: 5: 319: 317: 309: 308: 303: 293: 292: 287: 286: 279: 272: 264: 261: 260: 243: 218: 217: 206: 203:MPEP § 2138.04 195: 192:MPEP § 2138.05 184: 172: 171: 169: 166: 150: 147: 138: 135: 134: 133: 98: 87: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 318: 307: 304: 302: 299: 298: 296: 285: 280: 278: 273: 271: 266: 265: 259: 257: 253: 249: 244: 233: 228: 223: 215: 214:USPTO Website 210: 207: 204: 199: 196: 193: 188: 185: 182: 177: 174: 167: 164: 159: 157: 148: 146: 144: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 96: 92: 88: 85: 81: 77: 76: 75: 72: 70: 66: 62: 58: 53: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 256:expanding it 245: 221: 209: 198: 187: 176: 161: 152: 140: 130:bio-chemical 113: 105: 90: 79: 73: 71:532 (1890). 68: 56: 54: 21: 15: 132:substance." 295:Categories 181:MPEP § 715 168:References 69:On Patents 126:chemistry 65:Fed. Cir. 38:inventors 32:having a 26:invention 122:biology 97:(1995). 86:(1995). 40:in an 20:, the 252:stub 124:and 102:MPEP 16:In 297:: 116:, 108:, 93:, 82:, 59:, 283:e 276:t 269:v 258:. 63:(

Index

United States patent law
invention
patent application
sufficient disclosure
inventors
interference proceeding
first-to-invent
swearing behind a reference
802 F.2d 1367, 1376
Fed. Cir.
34 Fed. Cl. 532, 584
34 Fed. Cl. 532, 584
MPEP
849 F.Supp. 740, 742
927 F.2d 1200, 1206
biology
chemistry
bio-chemical
inventor's notebook
provisional application
MPEP § 715
MPEP § 2138.05
MPEP § 2138.04
USPTO Website
Flag of United States
law in the United States
stub
expanding it
v
t

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.