Knowledge (XXG)

Opposition proceeding

Source đź“ť

435:
In the case of trademarks, third parties may use opposition proceedings to "oppose" the acceptance of a trademark application after it has been accepted and published for opposition purposes. If an opposition is defeated the trademark will proceed to registration. Some jurisdictions operate a
466:(an administrative body within CIPO), which hears and makes decisions in opposition proceedings. The Board can either refuse the trademark application (in whole or in part) or reject the opposition. This decision can be appealed to the 31:
law of many jurisdictions which allows third parties to formally challenge the validity of a pending patent application ("pre-grant opposition"), of a granted patent ("post-grant opposition"), or of a trademark.
487:(including a discussion on the possibility, in some jurisdictions, for third parties to file observations during the examination of a patent application, see sub-section "Observations by third parties") 372: 362: 392: 484: 444:
In Canada, any third party can file a statement of opposition to stop a trademark from being registered for at least one of the reasons set out in the
379:(EPC). The term for filing an opposition with the EPO is nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the 162: 453: 343: 420: 157: 147: 391:
Opposition proceedings may be filed against French patents granted since April 1, 2020. The term for filing an opposition with the
423:(2011), any third party can challenge the validity of an issued patent using either post-grant review under 35 U.S.C. § 321 or 555: 674:
as "a tool which can be used to explore how to challenge unfair patents and their negative impact on access to medicines."
452:. A statement of opposition can only be filed during the two-month period after a trademark application is approved by the 240: 317: 525: 510: 376: 650: 463: 204: 183: 132: 678: 404: 380: 336: 245: 152: 636: 615: 585: 671: 718: 467: 436:"post-grant" opposition system, whereby opposition is not possible until after registration (e.g. Japan). 368: 266: 458: 210: 70: 65: 416: 395:(INPI) is nine months from the grant of the French patent. An opposition may be filed by a strawman. 75: 713: 424: 412: 329: 312: 235: 225: 220: 215: 116: 188: 96: 91: 261: 230: 137: 462:. The trademark applicant and opponent then submit pleadings, evidence and arguments to the 276: 142: 106: 302: 281: 271: 371:(EPO), third parties may challenge the validity of a granted European patent by filing a 707: 581: 408: 637:"Practice in trademark opposition proceedings—Canadian Intellectual Property Office" 479: 307: 60: 507: 427:
under 35 U.S.C. § 311. Both proceedings became effective September 16, 2012.
286: 411:. Post-grant review provisions of the new patent law may affect a potential 167: 28: 111: 686: 55: 24: 651:"Trademarks Opposition Board—Canadian Intellectual Property Office" 667: 616:"Opposition Proceedings—Canadian Intellectual Property Office" 526:"Loi PACTE : nouvelle procĂ©dure d'opposition brevet" 528:[PACTE Act: new patent opposition proceedings]. 363:
Opposition procedure before the European Patent Office
558:[1 year of opposition to French patents]. 23:is an administrative process available under the 549: 547: 125:Patentability requirements and related concepts 470:by both the trademark applicant and opponent. 337: 8: 586:"Post-Grant Review Aspect of New Patent Law" 485:Public participation in patent examination 344: 330: 39: 393:National Institute of Industrial Property 367:In the context of the proceedings at the 556:"1 an d'opposition aux brevets français" 520: 518: 503: 501: 554:Teyssèdre, Laurent (23 February 2022). 497: 407:, an opposition proceeding is called a 294: 253: 196: 175: 124: 83: 47: 42: 631: 629: 627: 625: 610: 608: 606: 685:. MSF Access Campaign. Archived from 560:Le Blog du Droit EuropĂ©en des Brevets 454:Canadian Intellectual Property Office 7: 653:. Government of Canada. 2019-08-30. 639:. Government of Canada. 2019-09-24. 618:. Government of Canada. 2020-06-30. 415:defendant's strategies in filing a 148:Inventive step and non-obviousness 16:Procedure for challenging a patent 14: 670:, an online resource launched by 421:Leahy–Smith America Invents Act 1: 456:(CIPO) and advertised in the 197:By region / country 101: 464:Trademarks Opposition Board 735: 683:Patent Opposition Database 668:Patent Opposition Database 419:action. Subsequent to the 377:European Patent Convention 360: 254:By specific subject matter 205:Patent Cooperation Treaty 184:Sufficiency of disclosure 163:Person skilled in the art 133:Patentable subject matter 584:LLP (January 23, 2012). 532:. INPI. 17 February 2020 405:United States patent law 381:European Patent Bulletin 176:Other legal requirements 153:Industrial applicability 672:Doctors without Borders 590:The National Law Review 468:Federal Court of Canada 450:Trademarks Regulations 369:European Patent Office 357:European Patent Office 373:post-grant opposition 21:opposition proceeding 417:declaratory judgment 425:inter partes review 413:patent infringement 84:Procedural concepts 689:on October 7, 2012 459:Trademarks Journal 189:Unity of invention 700: 354: 353: 726: 698: 696: 694: 675: 655: 654: 647: 641: 640: 633: 620: 619: 612: 601: 600: 598: 596: 578: 572: 571: 569: 567: 551: 542: 541: 539: 537: 522: 513: 505: 346: 339: 332: 40: 734: 733: 729: 728: 727: 725: 724: 723: 704: 703: 692: 690: 677: 664: 659: 658: 649: 648: 644: 635: 634: 623: 614: 613: 604: 594: 592: 580: 579: 575: 565: 563: 553: 552: 545: 535: 533: 524: 523: 516: 506: 499: 494: 476: 442: 433: 401: 389: 365: 359: 350: 303:Patent analysis 267:Business method 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 732: 730: 722: 721: 716: 706: 705: 702: 701: 663: 662:External links 660: 657: 656: 642: 621: 602: 573: 543: 514: 496: 495: 493: 490: 489: 488: 482: 475: 472: 446:Trademarks Act 441: 438: 432: 429: 400: 397: 388: 385: 361:Main article: 358: 355: 352: 351: 349: 348: 341: 334: 326: 323: 322: 321: 320: 315: 310: 305: 297: 296: 292: 291: 290: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 264: 256: 255: 251: 250: 249: 248: 243: 238: 233: 228: 223: 218: 213: 208: 199: 198: 194: 193: 192: 191: 186: 178: 177: 173: 172: 171: 170: 165: 160: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 127: 126: 122: 121: 120: 119: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 86: 85: 81: 80: 79: 78: 73: 68: 63: 58: 50: 49: 45: 44: 37: 34: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 731: 720: 719:Trademark law 717: 715: 712: 711: 709: 688: 684: 680: 673: 669: 666: 665: 661: 652: 646: 643: 638: 632: 630: 628: 626: 622: 617: 611: 609: 607: 603: 595:September 14, 591: 587: 583: 582:Andrews Kurth 577: 574: 561: 557: 550: 548: 544: 531: 527: 521: 519: 515: 512: 509: 504: 502: 498: 491: 486: 483: 481: 478: 477: 473: 471: 469: 465: 461: 460: 455: 451: 447: 439: 437: 430: 428: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 409:reexamination 406: 399:United States 398: 396: 394: 386: 384: 382: 378: 374: 370: 364: 356: 347: 342: 340: 335: 333: 328: 327: 325: 324: 319: 316: 314: 311: 309: 306: 304: 301: 300: 299: 298: 293: 288: 285: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 263: 260: 259: 258: 257: 252: 247: 246:United States 244: 242: 239: 237: 234: 232: 229: 227: 224: 222: 219: 217: 214: 212: 209: 206: 203: 202: 201: 200: 195: 190: 187: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 174: 169: 166: 164: 161: 159: 156: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 131: 130: 129: 128: 123: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 88: 87: 82: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 59: 57: 54: 53: 52: 51: 46: 41: 35: 33: 30: 26: 22: 691:. Retrieved 687:the original 682: 645: 593:. Retrieved 589: 576: 564:. Retrieved 559: 534:. Retrieved 529: 480:Patent watch 457: 449: 445: 443: 434: 402: 390: 366: 308:Pirate Party 138:Inventorship 117:Infringement 61:Patent claim 20: 18: 693:October 13, 566:27 February 562:(in French) 536:22 February 241:Netherlands 97:Prosecution 92:Application 714:Patent law 708:Categories 508:Article 99 492:References 431:Trademarks 375:under the 262:Biological 102:Opposition 43:Patent law 277:Insurance 211:Australia 168:Prior art 112:Licensing 107:Valuation 76:Criticism 71:Economics 48:Overviews 29:trademark 474:See also 318:Glossary 313:Category 295:See also 282:Software 272:Chemical 679:"About" 530:inpi.fr 231:Germany 158:Utility 143:Novelty 66:History 36:Patents 440:Canada 403:Under 387:France 226:Europe 216:Canada 56:Patent 25:patent 236:Japan 221:China 207:(PCT) 695:2012 597:2012 568:2022 538:2020 448:and 27:and 511:EPC 287:Tax 19:An 710:: 681:. 624:^ 605:^ 588:. 546:^ 517:^ 500:^ 383:. 699:) 697:. 676:( 599:. 570:. 540:. 345:e 338:t 331:v

Index

patent
trademark
Patent
Patent claim
History
Economics
Criticism
Application
Prosecution
Opposition
Valuation
Licensing
Infringement
Patentable subject matter
Inventorship
Novelty
Inventive step and non-obviousness
Industrial applicability
Utility
Person skilled in the art
Prior art
Sufficiency of disclosure
Unity of invention
Patent Cooperation Treaty
Australia
Canada
China
Europe
Germany
Japan

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑