Knowledge (XXG)

European patent law

Source 📝

951:. Unitary effect can be registered for a European patent upon grant, replacing validation of the European patent in the individual countries concerned. The unitary effect means a single renewal fee, a single (group of) owner(s), a single object of property, and uniform protection, which means that revocation as well as infringement proceedings are to be decided for the unitary patent as a whole rather than for each country individually. Licensing is however to remain possible for individual countries. 735:, extraterritorial infringement, infringement outside the term of the patent with economic effect during the term of the patent, infringement of product claims by processes for making or using, exports, assembly of parts into an infringing whole, etc.), the effect of prosecution history on interpretation of the claims, what remedies are available for infringement or bad faith enforcement (injunction, damages, attorney fees, other civil penalties for willful infringement, etc.), 795:, revocation, assignment. UK law is in many ways similar to the European Patent Convention (EPC) (although the EPC deals with very few post-grant activities). UK patents law also applies in the Isle of Man, while in certain dependent territories and crown dependencies, European patents can be registered. In Europe this is the case for Gibraltar (within 5 years of grant), Guernsey (at any time during the patent lifetime) and Jersey (within 3 years of grant). 648:(PCT) and later nationalised in the desired countries or at the EPO. However, Belgium, Cyprus, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Malta, Monaco, the Netherlands, and Slovenia have "closed their national route" meaning that it is no longer possible to nationalise an international application in those countries directly and protection can only be obtained via the EPO. 591: 563:, but rather to a bundle of essentially independent national European patents enforceable before national courts according to different national legislations and procedures. Similarly, Eurasian patents are granted by the Eurasian Patent Office and become after grant independent national Eurasian patents enforceable before national courts. 799:
Eurasian Patent Convention), Montenegro, and Bosnia and Herzegovina are extension states to the European Patent Convention, which means that European patents granted are deemed to take effect also in these states, if extension is correctly requested; and provided certain translation and publication requirements are met.
705:
provides that, in each member country, the national part of the European patent has the identical effect as a national patent with the identical claims would have. The European Patent Convention expressly adopts national law for all substantive attributes of a national part of a European patent, with
798:
National patents may be the only available patents in European states that are neither party to the European Patent Convention nor the Eurasian Patent Convention. This is the case for Andorra and Ukraine (which signed but did not ratify the Eurasian Patent Convention). Moldova (a former party to the
622:
A characteristic of European patent law as it stands today is that European patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO), and patents granted by national patent offices are available, and may possibly –if permitted by national law and, if so, to the extent permitted by national law– co-exist
775:
National patents are available in all European countries, except the Holy See. In some European countries, national patents are substantively examined, while in other countries there is no provision for such examination and patents are thus granted if formal requirements are met, while novelty and
877:
Substantive patent law has been harmonized to a certain extent across national laws in Europe, notably upon signature of the Strasbourg Convention of 1963 and the European Patent Convention (EPC) of 1973, and upon entry into force of the TRIPs Agreement. In practice however, the interpretation of
2037: 919:
The German patent system is, however, "particularly appealing for a large number of users", notably because it is regarded as relatively quick and affordable. The bifurcation character of the Germany system "is considered as both a shortcoming in some respects, and as an advantage in others."
693:
before the EPO are available however. The opposition procedure allows any person except for the patent proprietor to oppose a granted European patent in an attempt to have the EPO revoke or amend the patent. The opposition procedure may only be initiated within nine months of the grant of the
697:
After the unitary European examination and opposition phase ends, nearly all "unitary" nature of the European patent dissolves, and what remains is a collection of essentially-independent national patents, and ownership, validity and infringement of each being determined independently under
1345:
It can be cheaper to acquire national patent protection in a few selected partial markets in Europe, and may even offer a number of tactical advantages to the patent holder (deferment of examination, variability of patent claims for registration patents, or incontestability by means of
1046:
All EU member states except Italy and Spain, which abstained due to the exclusive use of English, French, and German languages, and Croatia, which subsequently acceded to the EU, joined the unitary patent regulation. States will only participate in the unitary patent if they ratify the
2022: 517: 938:
system, which would lead to a single unitary patent in the European Union (or its predecessor the European Community), has been debated since the 1970s. In 2012 agreement was reached between all European Union Member States except Italy and Spain on a
1245:- EPC Art. 2(2) "The European patent shall, in each of the Contracting States for which it is granted, have the effect of and be subject to the same conditions as a national patent granted by that State, unless this Convention provides otherwise."; 915:"When validity is challenged, the patentee says his patent is very small: the cat with its fur smoothed down, cuddly and sleepy. But when the patentee goes on the attack, the fur bristles, the cat is twice the size with teeth bared and eyes ablaze." 717:(subject matter, enabling disclosure, and claims beyond the content of the application as filed, protection has been extended or improper proprietor) - though each state is free to interpret the five grounds of Art. 138 under its own national law 886:
validity and infringement of patents are examined by different courts in different procedures (in a so-called "bifurcation system"), in the United Kingdom the same court is in charge of examining validity and infringement actions. According to
762:
Countries may create unitary protection with regards to patents, which means that the effect (including revocation) is equal in all countries concerned. Such unitary protection was effected (both for "national" and European patents) by
753:
Eurasian patents are granted under the Eurasian Patent Convention in a system which is similar to the European Patent Convention: after a unitary grant procedure the patent becomes a national patent in each of the 8 member states.
1963: 1935: 1648: 690: 677:
of the state if the text of the European patent as granted is not in one of their official languages. If the translation is not filed, the European patent is deemed to have no effect from the outset in that state. The
881:
Regarding procedural law, and especially regarding the procedures to examine infringement and validity of patents before national courts, significant differences exist across national laws. For instance, while in
739:, coexistence of an EP national part and a national patent for identical subject matter, ownership and assignment, extensions to patent term for regulatory approval, etc., are expressly remitted to national law. 571: 1901: 895:"... it is desirable to try infringement and validity issues together, where at all possible. If they are tried separately it is all too easy for the patentee to argue for a narrow interpretation of his 1868: 1539: 1641: 62: 2032: 1634: 2073: 1511:"Proposal for a Council regulation: implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements" 686: 776:
inventive step is not evaluated. It can be cheaper and tactically advantageous to apply for a few national patents rather than for a European patent at the European Patent Office.
1741: 1759: 958:
on 11 December 2012. The provisions, i.e. the Unitary Patent Regulation and the Translation Regulation, apply since June 1, 2023, the date of entry into force of the related
663: 1115:
EPO boards of appeal and key decisions: The future of the boards in the light of the possible introduction of the unitary patent and Unified Patent Court (Part 3 of 3)
670:(EPC). Before grant, a European patent application is a unitary legal entity. However, after grant, a "European patent" essentially ceases to have unitary character. 1927: 1027: 764: 1569:
Katrin Cremers; Max Ernicke; Fabian Gaessler; Dietmar Harhoff; Christian Helmers; Luke McDonagh; Paula Schliessler & Nicolas van Zeebroeck (September 2013).
176: 1547: 1994: 1941: 1022: 694:
European patent. The limitation and revocation procedures allow the patentee to centrally request the limitation or revocation of their own European patent.
644:
Patent applications can be filed at the relevant national patent office or at the EPO. Alternatively, an international application may be filed under the
2052: 954:
Agreement on the two EU regulations which make the unitary patent possible was reached during the European Council of 28–29 June 2012, and by the
710:
standards for revocation - national law is expressly preempted, and grounds for revoking a national part are limited to five grounds specified in
311: 1612: 2000: 1621: 1601: 990: 1284:"Treaty between the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on Patent Protection (Patent Treaty) of 22 December 1978]" 1841: 978: 492: 147: 67: 682:, which entered into force on May 1, 2008, significantly reduces the number of required translations in the states that are party to it. 1827: 1670: 1048: 959: 948: 306: 1473:"Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Unified and Integrated European Patent Litigation System. Final Report to the European Commission" 673:
Some of the 39 EPC contracting states require the patentee to file a full translation of the granted European patent with the national
1723: 296: 1976: 728: 169: 1320: 543:
Patents having effect in most European states may be obtained either nationally, via national patent offices, or via a centralised
1896: 1878: 1802: 1283: 1017: 53: 869:). The term of a utility model is usually shorter than the term of a patent and has less stringent patentability requirements. 551:(EPO). The EPO is a public international organisation established by the European Patent Convention (EPC). The EPO is neither a 1971: 1947: 1002: 767:
in 1980 with the Treaty between the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on Patent Protection of 1978.
1472: 1891: 1852: 1729: 1699: 389: 1986: 1358: 2078: 1765: 1717: 1705: 466: 162: 102: 86: 28: 1687: 732: 1679: 1510: 1270: 1263: 1256: 1249: 1242: 1228: 1214: 1200: 1186: 1139: 748: 727:
All other substantive attributes of each national part of an EP patent, such as what acts constitute infringement (
714: 702: 667: 657: 537: 521: 97: 39: 1857: 1359:"Registration of European patents (UK) in crown dependencies, UK overseas territories and Commonwealth countries" 1099: 1012: 645: 559:
institution. A patent granted by the EPO does not lead to a single European patent enforceable before one single
529: 353: 332: 281: 1812: 1792: 1787: 1753: 567: 525: 485: 394: 301: 1822: 1807: 1782: 1735: 1607: 1007: 974: 903:
In other words, the German bifurcation system is often regarded as favouring the patentee. In this respect,
679: 579: 130: 125: 965:
Other legal agreements have been proposed outside the European Union legal framework to reduce the cost of
1817: 1797: 548: 415: 44: 1427: 2047: 2038:
Rome Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations
1862: 1747: 1657: 1626: 359: 250: 219: 214: 784: 1912: 878:
common substantive provisions have led to different interpretations in different European countries.
224: 77: 1151: 955: 792: 478: 461: 384: 369: 364: 265: 1259:(EP patent conveys "same rights" as national patent, and infringement determined by national law; 1711: 1452: 1408: 1165: 904: 888: 544: 337: 245: 240: 907:
referred to a comparison reportedly made by Professor Mario Franzosi between a patentee and an
1886: 1617: 883: 736: 575: 556: 410: 379: 286: 1071: 2017: 1953: 1693: 1412: 993:(ZEW) found that German courts handle by far the largest number of patent litigation cases. 935: 788: 425: 291: 255: 2042: 836: 817: 629: 451: 430: 420: 120: 1456: 1332: 1113: 1917: 1661: 1171: 929: 896: 780: 552: 533: 72: 1294: 2067: 2027: 808: 674: 624: 456: 209: 1136: 711: 1267: 1260: 1253: 1246: 1225: 1211: 1197: 1183: 699: 1597: 1570: 1239: 966: 509: 1387: 899:
when defending it but an expansive interpretation when asserting infringement."
1102:, Opinion 1/09, Court of Justice of the European Union, July 2, 2010, point 4. 908: 513: 435: 791:
establish the law relating to patents including filing, examination, grant,
316: 566:
European patent law is also shaped by international agreements such as the
590: 970: 846: 830: 812: 638: 634: 260: 1290: 989:
Based on data from Germany, France, the Netherlands, and the UK, the
947:, a proposed new type of patent that would be valid in participating 822: 204: 1100:"Prise de position des Avocats Généraux présentée le 2 juillet 2010" 1390:. National Board of Patents and Registration of Finland. 2012-05-24 1118:. Munich, Germany: European Patent Office. 0:20 to 2:55 minutes in 862: 589: 572:
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
560: 1613:
Lost property: The European patent system and why it doesn't work
1902:
Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions
1630: 1458:
European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Incorporated
1156:, Information from the European Patent Office, January 2, 2007 2033:
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property
1571:"Patent Litigation in Europe, Discussion Paper No. 13-072" 1321:"The Return of European Patent Law in the European Union" 720:
infringement by the direct product of a patented process
605: Extension states by the European Patent Convention 1252:(patent term extension determined under national law); 1869:
Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. v. Cadbury UK Limited
1414:
European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc.
1616:, Bruegel Blueprint Series, Volume IX, 29 June 2009, 1742:
Directive on the re-use of public sector information
2010: 1985: 1962: 1926: 1877: 1840: 1775: 1760:
Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market
1678: 1669: 1072:"Member states of the European Patent Organisation" 666:before the EPO under procedures established by the 873:Differences and similarities between national laws 1167:Latvia: Closing of the National Route via the PCT 1266:(EP filing has same effect as national filing); 2074:Intellectual property law of the European Union 611: Parties to the Eurasian Patent Convention 599: Parties to the European Patent Convention 594:Regional patent convention membership in Europe 274:Patentability requirements and related concepts 1028:Unitary patent (Switzerland and Liechtenstein) 2001:German Law on the Protection of Trade Secrets 1642: 1576:. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) 1540:"Parliament approves EU unitary patent rules" 486: 170: 8: 1995:Directive on the Protection of Trade Secrets 1942:Directive on the legal protection of designs 1023:Patent infringement under United Kingdom law 977:(which entered into force in 2008) and the 1675: 1649: 1635: 1627: 723:patent term, 20 years from the filing date 493: 479: 188: 177: 163: 17: 1273:(ownership determined under national law) 981:(EPLA) (which never entered into force). 524:of 1973, and a number of European Union 2053:WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty 1063: 1039: 969:(of European patents when granted) and 443: 402: 345: 324: 273: 232: 196: 191: 138: 110: 85: 52: 27: 20: 1500:EU Regulations 1257/2012 and 1260/2012 662:A European patent is the product of a 1602:Centre for European Economic Research 1600:, Discussion Paper No. 13-072 by the 991:Centre for European Economic Research 924:Unitary patents in the European Union 7: 1112:Ingo Beckedorf (8–9 November 2012). 979:European Patent Litigation Agreement 691:limitation and revocation procedures 586:Types of patent protection in Europe 68:Supplementary protection certificate 1428:"How to develop a winning strategy" 1417:EWHC 600 (Pat) (26 March 2007), 88. 1293:. 1980. p. 407. Archived from 960:Agreement on a Unified Patent Court 949:member states of the European Union 941:European patent with unitary effect 641:, are available in some countries. 1724:Electronic Commerce Directive 2000 1546:. 11 December 2012. Archived from 1153:Accession to the PCT by Malta (MT) 1150:"European Patent Office web site, 297:Inventive step and non-obviousness 14: 1977:Traditional speciality guaranteed 729:indirect and divided infringement 1461:EWCA Civ 192 (19 March 2008), 5. 1018:Intellectual property in Romania 1972:Protected designation of origin 1948:Regulation on Community designs 1003:Enforcement of European patents 1: 1730:Information Society Directive 1700:Satellite and Cable Directive 943:, more commonly known as the 765:Switzerland and Liechtenstein 623:within a given jurisdiction. 1766:Customs Regulation 1383/2003 1718:Conditional Access Directive 1706:Copyright Duration Directive 346:By region / country 103:Eurasian Patent Organization 1688:Computer Programs Directive 1598:Patent Litigation in Europe 934:The creation of a European 733:infringement by equivalents 617: Other European States 2095: 1658:Intellectual property laws 927: 749:Eurasian Patent Convention 746: 706:the following exceptions: 668:European Patent Convention 658:European Patent Convention 655: 538:Eurasian Patent Convention 522:European Patent Convention 403:By specific subject matter 148:European Patent Litigation 98:Eurasian Patent Convention 40:European Patent Convention 1858:European Union trade mark 1013:European Union patent law 698:respective national law. 646:Patent Cooperation Treaty 354:Patent Cooperation Treaty 333:Sufficiency of disclosure 312:Person skilled in the art 282:Patentable subject matter 1964:Geographical indications 1754:Copyright Term Directive 1331:(3/1996). Archived from 1078:. European Patent Office 568:World Trade Organization 325:Other legal requirements 302:Industrial applicability 1736:Resale Rights Directive 1608:Bruno van Pottelsberghe 1008:European trade mark law 685:A central time-limited 664:unified grant procedure 574:(TRIPs Agreement), the 126:Cross-border injunction 865:(this list is however 619: 549:European Patent Office 45:European Patent Office 2048:WIPO Copyright Treaty 1863:Trade Marks Directive 1748:Enforcement Directive 1254:Article 64(1) and (3) 593: 532:. For some states in 518:Strasbourg Convention 1913:Unified Patent Court 1471:Harhoff, D. (2009). 1366:Official Journal EPO 891:, a British judge, 827:certificat d'utilité 687:opposition procedure 139:Historical proposals 78:Unified Patent Court 2079:European patent law 1908:European patent law 1550:on 16 December 2012 1544:European Parliament 1518:European Commission 956:European Parliament 783:, for example, the 512:including national 506:European patent law 233:Procedural concepts 22:European patent law 1712:Database Directive 1453:Lord Justice Jacob 1409:Mr Justice Kitchin 905:Lord Justice Jacob 889:Mr Justice Kitchin 843:modello di utilità 737:equitable defenses 627:, referred to as " 620: 545:patent prosecution 508:covers a range of 338:Unity of invention 2061: 2060: 1836: 1835: 1622:978-90-78910-12-1 1432:worldipreview.com 851:hyödyllisyysmalli 811:are available in 576:Patent Law Treaty 557:Council of Europe 503: 502: 187: 186: 113:and harmonization 63:Biotech directive 2086: 2023:Lisbon Agreement 2018:Berne Convention 1954:Community design 1694:Rental Directive 1676: 1651: 1644: 1637: 1628: 1586: 1585: 1583: 1581: 1575: 1566: 1560: 1559: 1557: 1555: 1536: 1530: 1529: 1527: 1525: 1515: 1507: 1501: 1498: 1492: 1491: 1489: 1487: 1477: 1468: 1462: 1450: 1444: 1443: 1441: 1439: 1424: 1418: 1406: 1400: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1388:"Utility models" 1384: 1378: 1377: 1375: 1373: 1368:(A97): 1–2. 2018 1363: 1355: 1349: 1348: 1342: 1340: 1335:on March 4, 2012 1316: 1310: 1309: 1307: 1305: 1300:on 28 March 2014 1299: 1288: 1280: 1274: 1237: 1231: 1223: 1217: 1209: 1203: 1195: 1189: 1181: 1175: 1163: 1157: 1148: 1142: 1134: 1128: 1127: 1125: 1123: 1109: 1103: 1098: 1094: 1088: 1087: 1085: 1083: 1068: 1052: 1044: 975:London Agreement 936:community patent 789:Patents Act 2004 785:Patents Act 1977 771:National patents 743:Eurasian patents 680:London Agreement 652:European patents 616: 610: 604: 598: 580:London Agreement 495: 488: 481: 189: 179: 172: 165: 150:Agreement (EPLA) 131:London Agreement 18: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2057: 2043:TRIPS Agreement 2006: 1981: 1958: 1936:Hague Agreement 1922: 1892:The Netherlands 1873: 1832: 1771: 1665: 1655: 1594: 1592:Further reading 1589: 1579: 1577: 1573: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1553: 1551: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1523: 1521: 1520:. 13 April 2011 1513: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1495: 1485: 1483: 1475: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1451: 1447: 1437: 1435: 1434:. 1 August 2012 1426: 1425: 1421: 1407: 1403: 1393: 1391: 1386: 1385: 1381: 1371: 1369: 1361: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1338: 1336: 1319:Bossung, Otto. 1318: 1317: 1313: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1238: 1234: 1224: 1220: 1210: 1206: 1196: 1192: 1182: 1178: 1164: 1160: 1149: 1145: 1135: 1131: 1121: 1119: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1081: 1079: 1070: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1045: 1041: 1036: 999: 987: 932: 926: 875: 859:Полезная модель 837:Gebrauchsmuster 818:Gebrauchsmuster 805: 773: 760: 758:Unitary patents 751: 745: 660: 654: 630:Gebrauchsmuster 618: 614: 612: 608: 606: 602: 600: 596: 588: 547:process at the 499: 452:Patent analysis 416:Business method 183: 152: 149: 121:Brussels Regime 112: 88: 87:Eurasian Patent 30: 29:European Patent 12: 11: 5: 2092: 2090: 2082: 2081: 2076: 2066: 2065: 2059: 2058: 2056: 2055: 2050: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2014: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2005: 2004: 1998: 1991: 1989: 1983: 1982: 1980: 1979: 1974: 1968: 1966: 1960: 1959: 1957: 1956: 1951: 1945: 1939: 1932: 1930: 1924: 1923: 1921: 1920: 1918:Unitary patent 1915: 1910: 1905: 1899: 1894: 1889: 1883: 1881: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1871: 1866: 1860: 1855: 1853:United Kingdom 1850: 1846: 1844: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1831: 1830: 1828:United Kingdom 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1779: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1770: 1769: 1763: 1757: 1751: 1745: 1739: 1733: 1727: 1721: 1715: 1709: 1703: 1697: 1691: 1684: 1682: 1673: 1667: 1666: 1662:European Union 1656: 1654: 1653: 1646: 1639: 1631: 1625: 1624: 1605: 1593: 1590: 1588: 1587: 1561: 1531: 1502: 1493: 1463: 1445: 1419: 1401: 1379: 1350: 1311: 1275: 1232: 1218: 1204: 1190: 1176: 1174:of April 2007. 1172:PCT Newsletter 1158: 1143: 1137:Article 139(3) 1129: 1104: 1089: 1062: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1053: 1038: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1020: 1015: 1010: 1005: 998: 995: 986: 983: 945:unitary patent 930:Unitary patent 928:Main article: 925: 922: 917: 916: 901: 900: 874: 871: 867:non-exhaustive 853:"), Denmark (" 809:utility models 804: 803:Utility models 801: 781:United Kingdom 772: 769: 759: 756: 747:Main article: 744: 741: 725: 724: 721: 718: 712:Article 138(1) 656:Main article: 653: 650: 625:Utility models 613: 607: 601: 595: 587: 584: 578:(PLT) and the 553:European Union 534:Eastern Europe 501: 500: 498: 497: 490: 483: 475: 472: 471: 470: 469: 464: 459: 454: 446: 445: 441: 440: 439: 438: 433: 428: 423: 418: 413: 405: 404: 400: 399: 398: 397: 392: 387: 382: 377: 372: 367: 362: 357: 348: 347: 343: 342: 341: 340: 335: 327: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 314: 309: 304: 299: 294: 289: 284: 276: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 263: 258: 253: 248: 243: 235: 234: 230: 229: 228: 227: 222: 217: 212: 207: 199: 198: 194: 193: 185: 184: 182: 181: 174: 167: 159: 156: 155: 154: 153: 146: 141: 140: 136: 135: 134: 133: 128: 123: 115: 114: 111:Centralization 108: 107: 106: 105: 100: 92: 91: 83: 82: 81: 80: 75: 73:Unitary patent 70: 65: 57: 56: 54:European Union 50: 49: 48: 47: 42: 34: 33: 25: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2091: 2080: 2077: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2069: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2028:Madrid system 2026: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2013: 2009: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1992: 1990: 1988: 1987:Trade secrets 1984: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1967: 1965: 1961: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1931: 1929: 1925: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1882: 1880: 1876: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1848: 1847: 1845: 1843: 1839: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1780: 1778: 1776:National laws 1774: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1719: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1683: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1672: 1668: 1663: 1659: 1652: 1647: 1645: 1640: 1638: 1633: 1632: 1629: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1572: 1565: 1562: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1535: 1532: 1519: 1512: 1506: 1503: 1497: 1494: 1481: 1474: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1446: 1433: 1429: 1423: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1402: 1389: 1383: 1380: 1367: 1360: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1315: 1312: 1296: 1292: 1285: 1279: 1276: 1272: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1258: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1247:Article 63(2) 1244: 1241: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1227: 1226:Article 63(1) 1222: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1212:Article 64(2) 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1184:Article 65(3) 1180: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1168: 1162: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1147: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1133: 1130: 1117: 1116: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1093: 1090: 1077: 1073: 1067: 1064: 1058: 1050: 1049:UPC Agreement 1043: 1040: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1009: 1006: 1004: 1001: 1000: 996: 994: 992: 984: 982: 980: 976: 973:, namely the 972: 968: 963: 961: 957: 952: 950: 946: 942: 937: 931: 923: 921: 914: 913: 912: 910: 906: 898: 894: 893: 892: 890: 885: 879: 872: 870: 868: 864: 860: 857:"), Russia (" 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 838: 832: 828: 824: 820: 819: 814: 810: 802: 800: 796: 794: 790: 786: 782: 777: 770: 768: 766: 757: 755: 750: 742: 740: 738: 734: 730: 722: 719: 716: 713: 709: 708: 707: 704: 701: 700:Article 64(1) 695: 692: 688: 683: 681: 676: 675:patent office 671: 669: 665: 659: 651: 649: 647: 642: 640: 636: 632: 631: 626: 592: 585: 583: 581: 577: 573: 569: 564: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 541: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 520:of 1963, the 519: 515: 511: 507: 496: 491: 489: 484: 482: 477: 476: 474: 473: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 449: 448: 447: 442: 437: 434: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 417: 414: 412: 409: 408: 407: 406: 401: 396: 395:United States 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 355: 352: 351: 350: 349: 344: 339: 336: 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 323: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 303: 300: 298: 295: 293: 290: 288: 285: 283: 280: 279: 278: 277: 272: 267: 264: 262: 259: 257: 254: 252: 249: 247: 244: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 231: 226: 223: 221: 218: 216: 213: 211: 208: 206: 203: 202: 201: 200: 195: 190: 180: 175: 173: 168: 166: 161: 160: 158: 157: 151: 145: 144: 143: 142: 137: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 118: 117: 116: 109: 104: 101: 99: 96: 95: 94: 93: 90: 84: 79: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 64: 61: 60: 59: 58: 55: 51: 46: 43: 41: 38: 37: 36: 35: 32: 26: 23: 19: 16: 1907: 1611: 1578:. Retrieved 1564: 1552:. Retrieved 1548:the original 1543: 1534: 1522:. Retrieved 1517: 1505: 1496: 1484:. Retrieved 1482:. p. 13 1480:ec.europa.eu 1479: 1466: 1457: 1448: 1436:. Retrieved 1431: 1422: 1413: 1404: 1392:. Retrieved 1382: 1370:. Retrieved 1365: 1353: 1346:opposition). 1344: 1337:. Retrieved 1333:the original 1328: 1324: 1314: 1302:. Retrieved 1295:the original 1278: 1235: 1221: 1207: 1193: 1179: 1166: 1161: 1152: 1146: 1132: 1122:November 16, 1120:. Retrieved 1114: 1107: 1092: 1080:. Retrieved 1075: 1066: 1042: 988: 964: 953: 944: 940: 933: 918: 902: 880: 876: 866: 858: 854: 850: 842: 834: 826: 816: 806: 797: 793:infringement 778: 774: 761: 752: 726: 696: 689:and central 684: 672: 661: 643: 628: 621: 565: 542: 510:legislations 505: 504: 457:Pirate Party 374: 287:Inventorship 266:Infringement 210:Patent claim 89:Organization 31:Organisation 21: 15: 1803:Netherlands 1554:11 December 1097:(in French) 1082:15 November 1076:www.epo.org 967:translation 841:), Italy (" 807:In Europe, 530:regulations 514:patent laws 390:Netherlands 246:Prosecution 241:Application 2068:Categories 1842:Trade mark 1680:Directives 1580:October 2, 1268:Article 74 1261:Article 66 1198:Article 99 1059:References 985:Statistics 971:litigation 909:Angora cat 855:brugsmodel 526:directives 411:Biological 251:Opposition 192:Patent law 1671:Copyright 1486:April 19, 1438:April 19, 1240:Article 2 540:applies. 426:Insurance 360:Australia 317:Prior art 261:Licensing 256:Valuation 225:Criticism 220:Economics 197:Overviews 2011:Treaties 1394:June 30, 1372:3 August 1339:June 30, 1304:19 April 997:See also 787:and the 467:Glossary 462:Category 444:See also 431:Software 421:Chemical 1928:Designs 1897:Romania 1887:Germany 1849:Ireland 1813:Romania 1793:Ireland 1788:Germany 1660:in the 1524:29 June 884:Germany 861:") and 847:Finland 831:Germany 813:Austria 779:In the 639:Austria 635:Germany 380:Germany 307:Utility 292:Novelty 215:History 2003:(2019) 1997:(2016) 1950:(2001) 1944:(1998) 1938:(1999) 1904:(1998) 1879:Patent 1865:(1988) 1823:Sweden 1808:Poland 1783:France 1768:(2003) 1762:(2019) 1756:(2006) 1750:(2004) 1744:(2003) 1738:(2001) 1732:(2001) 1726:(2000) 1720:(1998) 1714:(1996) 1708:(1993) 1702:(1993) 1696:(1992) 1690:(1991) 1620:  1291:OJ EPO 823:France 615:  609:  603:  597:  555:nor a 536:, the 516:, the 375:Europe 365:Canada 205:Patent 1818:Spain 1798:Italy 1604:(ZEW) 1574:(PDF) 1514:(PDF) 1476:(PDF) 1362:(PDF) 1298:(PDF) 1287:(PDF) 1034:Notes 897:claim 863:Spain 633:" in 561:court 385:Japan 370:China 356:(PCT) 1664:(EU) 1618:ISBN 1582:2013 1556:2012 1526:2012 1488:2014 1440:2014 1396:2012 1374:2021 1341:2012 1306:2014 1124:2013 1084:2022 845:"), 829:"), 637:and 528:and 1325:IIC 1271:EPC 1264:EPC 1257:EPC 1250:EPC 1243:EPC 1229:EPC 1215:EPC 1201:EPC 1187:EPC 1140:EPC 821:), 715:EPC 703:EPC 570:'s 436:Tax 2070:: 1610:, 1542:. 1516:. 1478:. 1455:, 1430:. 1411:, 1364:. 1343:. 1329:27 1327:. 1323:. 1289:. 1170:, 1074:. 962:. 911:: 849:(" 825:(" 731:, 582:. 1650:e 1643:t 1636:v 1584:. 1558:. 1528:. 1490:. 1442:. 1398:. 1376:. 1308:. 1126:. 1086:. 1051:. 839:" 835:" 833:( 815:( 494:e 487:t 480:v 178:e 171:t 164:v

Index

European patent law
European Patent
Organisation

European Patent Convention
European Patent Office
European Union
Biotech directive
Supplementary protection certificate
Unitary patent
Unified Patent Court
Eurasian Patent
Organization

Eurasian Patent Convention
Eurasian Patent Organization
Brussels Regime
Cross-border injunction
London Agreement
European Patent Litigation
Agreement (EPLA)

v
t
e
Patent
Patent claim
History
Economics
Criticism
Application
Prosecution
Opposition
Valuation
Licensing
Infringement

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.