222:
356:. The site is currently being leased by Oregon LNG and consists of 96 acres (39 ha) on the Skipanon Peninsula, a man-made peninsula that was created in the 1920s out of dredge spoils. The proposed terminal would have the capacity to liquefy and ship up to 9.6 million tons of LNG per year and would also have the capacity to import and re-vaporize up to 500 million cubic feet of natural gas per day during regional supply emergencies.
360:
gaseous state to be piped to customers. If built, the Oregon LNG project would include a marine shipping and receiving terminal, two full-containment 160,000-cubic-meter LNG storage tanks, and facilities for ship berthing and offloading. The storage tanks would be 190 feet tall and would be visible from
Astoria. A 2,100-foot (640 m) pier would jut into the river, where a basin would be dredged for LNG tankers to unload.
120:
25:
66:
368:
The project currently known as Oregon LNG began as the
Skipanon Natural Gas Facility, with initial talks in 2004. Calpine Energy initiated the project, signing a lease for the 96-acre (388,500 m2) site with the Port of Astoria. In 2005, Calpine went into bankruptcy and the project was subsequently
359:
For transport, the gas is chilled to approximately negative 260 °F (- 163 °C). This condenses the gas into a liquid, making it much more compact and economical to ship. At its destination, the LNG is transferred from cargo ships to a receiving terminal, which then warms the LNG back to a
384:
Oregon LNG was opposed by a number of groups including The
Columbia Riverkeeper and Rising Tide who support reduced pollution, non-fossil fuel, renewable energy sources. The pipeline is also opposed by certain landowners who object to eminent domain laws that would force them to have pipelines
372:
Oregon LNG filed a formal application with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in October 2008 for the import portion of the project. Following the discovery of large shale-gas reserves in the United States and Canada, Oregon LNG modified the project concept and entered FERC's
396:
that describe why Oregon LNG's project would violate environmental laws. Over two dozen fishing, landowner, community safety, and conservation organizations joined
Columbia Riverkeeper on these comments.
406:
Expert Report: Review of the Draft
Biological Assessment and Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for Proposed Oregon LNG Terminal Project. Richard Williams, PhD. Clear Creek Consulting. January 8, 2015
385:
buried on their properties. In 2011 the Oregon
Legislature passed House Bill 2700, which streamlined the permitting of such linear facilities amid a great deal of citizen objections and protests.
369:
acquired from
Calpine in January, 2007 by a partnership between original managers of the project and Leucadia National Corp. Leucadia holds a majority share of Oregon LNG.
557:
590:
579:
403:
Expert Report: Review of the
Impacts of Oregon LNG’s Proposed Pipeline on Aquatic Ecosystems. Jonathan Rhodes, PhD. Planeto Azul Hydrology. January 12, 2015
251:
393:
644:
634:
337:
Corporation, listed on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE: LUK). The Oregon LNG Project announced that it was ceasing operations on 15 April 2016.
639:
389:
568:
629:
535:
309:
291:
203:
52:
558:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Exh-4-Center-for-Biological-Diversity-Oregon-LNG-404-Permit-Comments1.pdf
591:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015.2.13-FINAL-Columbia-Riverkeeper-et-al.-OLNG-401-Cert-Comments1.pdf
580:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015.1.15-FINAL-Columbia-Riverkeeper-et-al.-OLNG-Corps-404-comments.pdf
624:
471:
524:
141:
546:
513:
184:
267:
156:
137:
38:
163:
243:
247:
170:
130:
329:(LNG) production (i.e. liquefaction), shipping, and receiving hub and a natural gas pipeline in northwest
326:
152:
569:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015.1.16-State-of-Oregon-Letter-to-FERC.pdf
232:
536:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015.1.16-ODFW-Corps-OLNG-JPA-final.pdf
236:
341:
334:
271:
256:
352:, and is less than 10 miles (16 km) from the point where the Columbia empties into the
260:
76:
525:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Exh-1-Williams-Expert-Report.pdf
349:
325:
is an American energy company whose sole project was a proposal to build a bi-directional
44:
547:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015.1.16-CREST-404-Comment.pdf
514:
http://columbiariverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Exh-3-Rhodes-Expert-Report.pdf
177:
345:
618:
499:
475:
353:
376:
The Oregon LNG Project announced that it was ceasing operations on 15 April 2016.
388:
Local and state agencies, and tribes recently submitted detailed comments to the
95:
119:
85:
65:
412:
Columbia River Estuary Study Taskforce (CREST) Public Comments Oregon LNG
409:
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Public Comments Oregon LNG
373:"Pre-Filing" process for the export portion of the project in July 2012.
609:
418:
State of Oregon Letter to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
497:
Sickinger, Ted (October 14, 2008). "Another player enters LNG fray".
330:
340:
The site of the proposed bi-directional Oregon LNG facility was in
421:
Columbia Riverkeeper et al. Public Comments Oregon LNG: Corps
215:
113:
59:
18:
604:
446:
424:
Columbia Riverkeeper et al. Public Comments Oregon LNG: DEQ
415:
Center for Biological Diversity Public Comments Oregon LNG
254:
and tools are available to assist in formatting, such as
90:
80:
144:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
333:. Oregon LNG is controlled by the US conglomerate
472:"Oregon LNG cancels plan for Warrenton terminal"
348:. Warrenton is eight miles (13 km) west of
441:
439:
8:
235:, which are uninformative and vulnerable to
250:and maintains a consistent citation style.
53:Learn how and when to remove these messages
394:Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
310:Learn how and when to remove this message
292:Learn how and when to remove this message
204:Learn how and when to remove this message
435:
7:
142:adding citations to reliable sources
242:Please consider converting them to
14:
34:This article has multiple issues.
220:
118:
64:
23:
645:Liquefied natural gas terminals
635:Energy infrastructure in Oregon
129:needs additional citations for
42:or discuss these issues on the
246:to ensure the article remains
1:
640:Liquefied natural gas plants
390:U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
661:
630:Companies based in Oregon
344:, on the estuary of the
79:, as no other articles
16:American energy company
625:Clatsop County, Oregon
327:liquefied natural gas
392:(Corps), and to the
138:improve this article
98:for suggestions.
88:to this page from
342:Warrenton, Oregon
335:Leucadia National
320:
319:
312:
302:
301:
294:
252:Several templates
214:
213:
206:
188:
112:
111:
57:
652:
593:
588:
582:
577:
571:
566:
560:
555:
549:
544:
538:
533:
527:
522:
516:
511:
505:
504:
494:
488:
487:
485:
483:
468:
462:
461:
459:
457:
443:
315:
308:
297:
290:
286:
283:
277:
275:
264:
224:
223:
216:
209:
202:
198:
195:
189:
187:
146:
122:
114:
107:
104:
93:
91:related articles
68:
60:
49:
27:
26:
19:
660:
659:
655:
654:
653:
651:
650:
649:
615:
614:
610:Oregon Pipeline
601:
596:
589:
585:
578:
574:
567:
563:
556:
552:
545:
541:
534:
530:
523:
519:
512:
508:
496:
495:
491:
481:
479:
478:. 16 April 2016
470:
469:
465:
455:
453:
445:
444:
437:
433:
382:
366:
350:Astoria, Oregon
316:
305:
304:
303:
298:
287:
281:
278:
266:
255:
241:
225:
221:
210:
199:
193:
190:
147:
145:
135:
123:
108:
102:
99:
89:
86:introduce links
69:
28:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
658:
656:
648:
647:
642:
637:
632:
627:
617:
616:
613:
612:
607:
600:
599:External links
597:
595:
594:
583:
572:
561:
550:
539:
528:
517:
506:
489:
463:
434:
432:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
381:
378:
365:
362:
346:Columbia River
318:
317:
300:
299:
244:full citations
228:
226:
219:
212:
211:
194:September 2016
126:
124:
117:
110:
109:
96:Find link tool
72:
70:
63:
58:
32:
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
657:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
626:
623:
622:
620:
611:
608:
606:
603:
602:
598:
592:
587:
584:
581:
576:
573:
570:
565:
562:
559:
554:
551:
548:
543:
540:
537:
532:
529:
526:
521:
518:
515:
510:
507:
502:
501:
500:The Oregonian
493:
490:
477:
476:The Oregonian
473:
467:
464:
452:
451:oregonlng.com
448:
442:
440:
436:
430:
423:
420:
417:
414:
411:
408:
405:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
391:
386:
379:
377:
374:
370:
363:
361:
357:
355:
354:Pacific Ocean
351:
347:
343:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
314:
311:
296:
293:
285:
273:
272:documentation
269:
262:
261:documentation
258:
253:
249:
245:
240:
238:
234:
229:This article
227:
218:
217:
208:
205:
197:
186:
183:
179:
176:
172:
169:
165:
162:
158:
155: –
154:
150:
149:Find sources:
143:
139:
133:
132:
127:This article
125:
121:
116:
115:
106:
97:
92:
87:
83:
82:
78:
73:This article
71:
67:
62:
61:
56:
54:
47:
46:
41:
40:
35:
30:
21:
20:
586:
575:
564:
553:
542:
531:
520:
509:
498:
492:
482:13 September
480:. Retrieved
466:
456:13 September
454:. Retrieved
450:
387:
383:
375:
371:
367:
358:
339:
322:
321:
306:
288:
279:
268:Citation bot
230:
200:
191:
181:
174:
167:
160:
153:"Oregon LNG"
148:
136:Please help
131:verification
128:
103:October 2020
100:
74:
50:
43:
37:
36:Please help
33:
447:"OregonLNG"
619:Categories
605:Oregon LNG
431:References
380:Opposition
323:Oregon LNG
248:verifiable
164:newspapers
94:; try the
81:link to it
39:improve it
282:June 2022
233:bare URLs
84:. Please
45:talk page
237:link rot
364:History
178:scholar
331:Oregon
257:reFill
180:
173:
166:
159:
151:
77:orphan
75:is an
231:uses
185:JSTOR
171:books
484:2016
458:2016
265:and
157:news
140:by
621::
474:.
449:.
438:^
48:.
503:.
486:.
460:.
313:)
307:(
295:)
289:(
284:)
280:(
276:.
274:)
270:(
263:)
259:(
239:.
207:)
201:(
196:)
192:(
182:·
175:·
168:·
161:·
134:.
105:)
101:(
55:)
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
