704:, may decide to work only with an attorney or only with an accountant who is also an attorney; some or all of the resulting communications may be privileged provided that all the requirements for the attorney–client privilege are met. The mere fact that the practitioner is an attorney will not create a valid attorney–client privilege with respect to a communication. For example, if the practitioner provides business or accounting advice rather than legal advice attorney–client privilege might not be established.
735:
error." Parties cannot merely state that they took "reasonable steps to prevent disclosure," instead they must give the court a detailed account of the procedures they took. Further, merely sending a letter demanding the return of privileged documents after discovering their inadvertent disclosure may not satisfy the requisite prompt response required.
585:
The privilege protects the confidential communication, and not the underlying information. For instance, if a client has previously disclosed confidential information to a third party who is not an attorney, and then gives the same information to an attorney, the attorney–client privilege will still
565:
An attorney speaking publicly in regard to a client's personal business and private affairs can be reprimanded by the bar or disbarred, regardless of the fact that he or she may be no longer representing the client. Discussing a client's or past client's criminal history, or otherwise, is viewed as a
630:
Lawyers may also breach the duty where they are defending themselves against disciplinary or legal proceedings. A client who initiates proceedings against a lawyer effectively waives rights to confidentiality. This is justified on grounds of procedural fairness—a lawyer unable to reveal information
626:
Lawyers may disclose confidential information relating to the retainer where they are reasonably seeking to collect payment for services rendered. This is justified on policy grounds. If lawyers were unable to disclose such information, many would undertake legal work only where payment is made in
617:
require that the crime or fraud discussed between client and attorney be carried out to be triggered. U.S. courts have not yet conclusively ruled how little knowledge an attorney can have of the underlying crime or fraud before the privilege detaches and the attorney's communications or requisite
734:
FRE 502(b) provides that inadvertent disclosures during a federal proceeding or to a federal office or agency do not act as a waiver of the privilege if the holder of the privilege "took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure" in the first place and "promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the
562:. The common interest rule "serves to protect the confidentiality of communications passing from one party to another party where a joint defense or strategy has been decided upon and undertaken by the parties and their respective counsel."
731:, the federal court will apply the federal common law of attorney–client privilege; however, Rule 501 grants flexibility to the federal courts, allowing them to construe the privilege "in light of experience and reason".
581:
When an attorney is not acting primarily as an attorney but, for instance, as a business advisor, member of the Board of
Directors, or in another non-legal role, then the privilege generally does not apply.
691:
Courts have occasionally revoked the privilege after the death of the client if it is deemed that doing so serves the client's intent, such as in the case of resolving testamentary disputes among heirs.
612:
stated that "A client who consults an attorney for advice that will serve him in the commission of a fraud will have no help from the law. He must let the truth be told." The crime–fraud exception also
154:
964:
700:
In the United States, communications between accountants and their clients are usually not privileged. A person who is worried about accusations of questionable accounting, such as
459:
in the United States. Attorney–client privilege is " client's right to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications between the
470:, the privilege encourages clients to make "full and frank" disclosures to their attorneys, who are then better able to provide candid advice and effective representation.
760:
35:
676:
In certain cases, the client may desire or consent to revelation of personal or family secrets only after his or her death; for example, the will may leave a
466:
The attorney–client privilege is one of the oldest privileges for confidential communications. The United States
Supreme Court has stated that by assuring
912:
39:
673:
require explanation or interpretation through other proof (extrinsic evidence), such as the attorney's file notes or correspondence from the client.
600:
The crime–fraud exception can render the privilege moot when communications between an attorney and client are themselves used to further a crime,
723:
to determine whether to apply the privilege law of the relevant state or federal common law. If the case is brought to the federal court under
1130:
Provides background and key links on the 2008 amendment "to address the waiver of the attorney–client privilege and the work product doctrine."
431:
1152:
858:
816:
609:
544:
the communication was made in the presence of individuals who were neither attorney nor client, or was disclosed to such individuals,
707:
Under federal tax law in the United States, for communications on or after July 22, 1998, there is a limited federally authorized
765:
708:
506:
may not be covered under the Kovell
Standard, depending on the Court and the nature of their work, and their involvement in the
770:
486:. Experts hired by attorneys to assist in representation of a client may vary by profession. Such experts can be such as
913:
https://www.hklaw.com/-/media/files/insights/publications/2021/12/maintainingprivilegewithnonlawyerexpertsunderkovel.pdf
456:
339:
304:
207:
31:
518:
Although there are minor variations, the elements necessary to establish the attorney–client privilege generally are:
487:
900:
424:
314:
1127:
805:
720:
217:
106:
1162:
780:
344:
823:
800:
785:
654:
555:
888:
478:
With respect to experts that are hired by the attorneys, the
Attorney-Client privilege is referred to as a
724:
299:
159:
121:
101:
864:
677:
586:
protect the communication to the attorney, but will not protect the communication with the third party.
570:
417:
270:
174:
144:
139:
280:
1041:"H.R.2676 - 105th Congress (1997-1998): Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998"
810:
775:
644:
559:
255:
240:
183:
96:
91:
76:
1137:
745:
260:
750:
396:
245:
202:
164:
1040:
589:
The privilege may be waived if the confidential communications are disclosed to third parties.
795:
755:
460:
361:
324:
319:
265:
250:
149:
1012:, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19597 (citing In re Sealed Case, 107 F.3d 46, 49, 51 (D.C. Cir. 1997)
502:. These experts may be disclosed or undisclosed to the Court. In the United States disclosed
1157:
728:
727:, the law of the relevant state will be used to apply the privilege. If the case involves a
681:
356:
334:
309:
235:
212:
192:
86:
719:
If a case arises in the federal court system, the federal court will apply Rule 501 of the
550:
the client has waived the privilege (for example by publicly disclosing the communication).
540:
There are a number of exceptions to the privilege in most jurisdictions, chief among them:
670:
661:
may be disclosed in order to prove that a will represented the intent of the now deceased
467:
329:
197:
130:
116:
17:
666:
503:
275:
169:
48:
592:
Other limits to the privilege may apply depending on the situation being adjudicated.
482:
based on the case of United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918 (2d Cir. 1961) or broadly a
1146:
1133:
685:
640:
111:
81:
631:
relating to the retainer would be unable to defend themselves against such action.
569:
The attorney–client privilege is separate from and should not be confused with the
507:
405:
391:
1086:
1061:
901:
https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2022/jul/kovel-agreement-basics.html
701:
790:
627:
advance. This would arguably adversely affect the public's access to justice.
452:
371:
350:
1087:"Rule 502. Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product; Limitations on Waiver"
495:
400:
71:
522:
The asserted holder of the privilege is (or sought to become) a client; and
662:
658:
547:
the communication was made for the purpose of committing a crime or tort,
528:
is a member of the bar of a court, or a subordinate of such a member, and
499:
381:
30:
This article is about the law in the United States. For an overview, see
889:
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/296/918/131265/
650:
491:
289:
226:
965:"Client-Lawyer Relationship Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information"
531:
in connection with this communication, is acting as an attorney; and
657:. Previously confidential communications between the lawyer and
601:
386:
536:
The communication was for the purpose of securing legal advice.
56:
711:
that may apply to certain communications with non-attorneys.
1134:
Office of the
General Counsel: The Attorney–Client Privilege
622:
Disclosure ostensibly to support lawyer's own interests
554:
A corollary to the attorney–client privilege is the
761:Legal professional privilege (England & Wales)
847:, p. 1391 col. 2 (Bryan A. Garner 10th ed. 2014).
36:Legal professional privilege in England and Wales
525:The person to whom the communication was made:
1010:In re Grand Jury Subpoena of Francis D. Carter
27:Confidentiality of communications with counsel
425:
8:
514:General requirements under United States law
947:
945:
1128:Federal Rule of Evidence 502 Resource Page
1113:See e.g., Williams v. District of Columbia
986:Handguards, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson,
984:274 F.Supp.2d 1118, 1127 (N.D. Cal 2003);
939:, 89 F. Supp. 357, 358–59 (D. Mass. 1950).
432:
418:
44:
40:Legal professional privilege in Australia
982:North Pacifica, LLC v. City of Pacifica,
952:LaForest v. Honeywell International Inc.
937:United States v. United Shoe Mach. Corp.
34:. For the law in England and Wales, see
836:
369:
288:
225:
182:
129:
63:
47:
932:, 371 U.S. 951, 83 S. Ct. 505 (1963),
1108:
1106:
859:Swidler & Berlin v. United States
817:Swidler & Berlin v. United States
635:Disclosure for the purpose of probate
7:
928:, 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir. 1962),
988:69 F.R.D. 451, 453 (N.D. Cal 1975).
25:
1115:, 806 F.Supp.2d 44 (D.D.C. 2011).
1091:LII / Legal Information Institute
1066:LII / Legal Information Institute
1025:132 F.3d 504 (9th Cir. 1997) vs.
1062:"Rule 501. Privilege in General"
577:When the privilege may not apply
38:. For the law in Australia, see
665:. In many instances, the will,
1085:Staff, L. I. I. (2011-11-30).
1:
843:"Attorney–client privilege",
621:
618:testimony become admissible.
1153:Legal professional privilege
1027:In re Grand Jury Proceedings
877:Upjohn Co. v. United States,
863:, 524 U.S. 399,
457:legal professional privilege
340:Declaration against interest
208:Self-authenticating document
32:Legal professional privilege
1039:Archer, Bill (1998-07-22).
766:Physician–patient privilege
709:accountant–client privilege
566:breach of confidentiality.
558:, which is also called the
1179:
638:
29:
879:449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981).
806:Subpoena ad testificandum
771:Priest–penitent privilege
721:Federal Rules of Evidence
445:Attorney–client privilege
218:Hague Evidence Convention
107:Eyewitness identification
18:Attorney client privilege
781:Public Interest Immunity
669:, or other parts of the
649:Another case is for the
345:Present sense impression
155:Public policy exclusions
1029:(1996) (9th Cir. 1996).
1000:, 289 U.S. 1, 15 (1933)
954:, 2004 WL 1498916, p. 3
926:Colton v. United States
915:Retrieved Feb. 17, 2024
903:Retrieved Feb. 17, 2024
891:Retrieved Feb. 17, 2024
824:Upjohn v. United States
801:State Secrets Privilege
655:last will and testament
556:joint defense privilege
449:lawyer–client privilege
1023:United States v. Bauer
998:Clark v. United States
845:Black's Law Dictionary
725:diversity jurisdiction
606:Clark v. United States
122:Consciousness of guilt
715:In the federal courts
596:Crime–fraud exception
571:work-product doctrine
271:Recorded recollection
811:Subpoena duces tecum
786:Reporter's privilege
776:Privilege (evidence)
560:common interest rule
463:and the attorney."
305:in United States law
1138:Stanford University
969:www.americanbar.org
746:Admissible evidence
145:Laying a foundation
1043:. www.congress.gov
751:Buried Bodies Case
610:U.S. Supreme Court
401:trusts and estates
281:Dead Man's Statute
246:Direct examination
203:Best evidence rule
796:Spousal privilege
756:Contract attorney
645:Surrogate's court
442:
441:
362:Implied assertion
325:Dying declaration
320:Excited utterance
266:Proffer agreement
251:Cross-examination
64:Types of evidence
16:(Redirected from
1170:
1116:
1110:
1101:
1100:
1098:
1097:
1082:
1076:
1075:
1073:
1072:
1058:
1052:
1051:
1049:
1048:
1036:
1030:
1019:
1013:
1007:
1001:
995:
989:
979:
973:
972:
961:
955:
949:
940:
922:
916:
910:
904:
898:
892:
886:
880:
874:
868:
862:
854:
848:
841:
729:federal question
504:Expert witnesses
434:
427:
420:
357:Learned treatise
335:Ancient document
315:Business records
213:Ancient document
193:Chain of custody
45:
21:
1178:
1177:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1163:Confidentiality
1143:
1142:
1124:
1119:
1111:
1104:
1095:
1093:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1070:
1068:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1046:
1044:
1038:
1037:
1033:
1020:
1016:
1008:
1004:
996:
992:
980:
976:
963:
962:
958:
950:
943:
923:
919:
911:
907:
899:
895:
887:
883:
875:
871:
856:
855:
851:
842:
838:
834:
829:
741:
717:
698:
647:
637:
624:
604:, or fraud. In
598:
579:
516:
496:medical doctors
484:Kovel Agreement
476:
468:confidentiality
438:
330:Party admission
198:Judicial notice
140:Burden of proof
82:Real (physical)
43:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1176:
1174:
1166:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1145:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1131:
1123:
1122:External links
1120:
1118:
1117:
1102:
1077:
1053:
1031:
1014:
1002:
990:
974:
956:
941:
917:
905:
893:
881:
869:
849:
835:
833:
830:
828:
827:
820:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
742:
740:
737:
716:
713:
697:
694:
636:
633:
623:
620:
597:
594:
578:
575:
552:
551:
548:
545:
538:
537:
534:
533:
532:
529:
523:
515:
512:
480:Kovel standard
475:
474:Kovel Standard
472:
440:
439:
437:
436:
429:
422:
414:
411:
410:
409:
408:
403:
394:
389:
384:
376:
375:
367:
366:
365:
364:
359:
354:
347:
342:
337:
332:
327:
322:
317:
312:
307:
302:
300:in English law
294:
293:
292:and exceptions
286:
285:
284:
283:
278:
276:Expert witness
273:
268:
263:
258:
253:
248:
243:
238:
230:
229:
223:
222:
221:
220:
215:
210:
205:
200:
195:
187:
186:
184:Authentication
180:
179:
178:
177:
172:
167:
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
134:
133:
127:
126:
125:
124:
119:
114:
109:
104:
99:
94:
89:
84:
79:
74:
66:
65:
61:
60:
52:
51:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1175:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1150:
1148:
1139:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1121:
1114:
1109:
1107:
1103:
1092:
1088:
1081:
1078:
1067:
1063:
1057:
1054:
1042:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1003:
999:
994:
991:
987:
983:
978:
975:
970:
966:
960:
957:
953:
948:
946:
942:
938:
935:
931:
927:
921:
918:
914:
909:
906:
902:
897:
894:
890:
885:
882:
878:
873:
870:
866:
861:
860:
853:
850:
846:
840:
837:
831:
826:
825:
821:
819:
818:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
743:
738:
736:
732:
730:
726:
722:
714:
712:
710:
705:
703:
695:
693:
689:
687:
686:natural child
683:
679:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
646:
642:
641:Probate court
634:
632:
628:
619:
616:
611:
607:
603:
595:
593:
590:
587:
583:
576:
574:
572:
567:
563:
561:
557:
549:
546:
543:
542:
541:
535:
530:
527:
526:
524:
521:
520:
519:
513:
511:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
473:
471:
469:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
435:
430:
428:
423:
421:
416:
415:
413:
412:
407:
404:
402:
398:
395:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
379:
378:
377:
373:
368:
363:
360:
358:
355:
353:
352:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
336:
333:
331:
328:
326:
323:
321:
318:
316:
313:
311:
308:
306:
303:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
282:
279:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
254:
252:
249:
247:
244:
242:
239:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
224:
219:
216:
214:
211:
209:
206:
204:
201:
199:
196:
194:
191:
190:
189:
188:
185:
181:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
128:
123:
120:
118:
115:
113:
112:Genetic (DNA)
110:
108:
105:
103:
102:Demonstrative
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
69:
68:
67:
62:
58:
54:
53:
50:
46:
41:
37:
33:
19:
1112:
1094:. Retrieved
1090:
1080:
1069:. Retrieved
1065:
1056:
1045:. Retrieved
1034:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1009:
1005:
997:
993:
985:
981:
977:
968:
959:
951:
936:
933:
930:cert. denied
929:
925:
920:
908:
896:
884:
876:
872:
867: (1998).
857:
852:
844:
839:
822:
815:
733:
718:
706:
699:
696:Tax practice
690:
675:
648:
629:
625:
614:
605:
599:
591:
588:
584:
580:
568:
564:
553:
539:
517:
508:legal advice
483:
479:
477:
465:
455:doctrine of
448:
444:
443:
406:Criminal law
349:
175:Similar fact
55:Part of the
924:See, e.g.,
791:Shield laws
702:tax evasion
671:estate plan
310:Confessions
261:Impeachment
150:Materiality
97:Inculpatory
92:Exculpatory
77:Documentary
1147:Categories
1096:2021-12-14
1071:2021-04-27
1047:2020-11-10
1021:See, e.g.
832:References
639:See also:
453:common law
372:common law
351:Res gestae
236:Competence
160:Spoliation
510:process.
500:engineers
492:Actuaries
241:Privilege
227:Witnesses
165:Character
131:Relevance
72:Testimony
739:See also
682:paramour
663:decedent
659:testator
392:Property
382:Contract
256:Redirect
49:Evidence
1158:Privacy
667:codicil
651:probate
451:is the
290:Hearsay
87:Digital
934:citing
678:legacy
608:, the
461:client
370:Other
59:series
1136:from
684:or a
680:to a
653:of a
498:, or
397:Wills
374:areas
170:Habit
643:and
615:does
602:tort
488:CPAs
387:Tort
117:Lies
865:403
447:or
57:law
1149::
1105:^
1089:.
1064:.
967:.
944:^
688:.
573:.
494:,
490:,
399:,
1099:.
1074:.
1050:.
971:.
433:e
426:t
419:v
42:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.