40:
66:
Sabrina
Freeman in her personal capacity, Jordan Lefaivre, an Infant, by his Guardian ad litem, Leighton Lefaivre, and the said Leighton Lefaivre in his personal capacity, Russell Gordon Pearce, an Infant, by his Guardian ad litem, Janet Gordon Pearce, and the said Janet Gordon Pearce in her personal capacity
289:
from which differential treatment must be shown. In this case, the Court identified the comparator group as a person who is not suffering from a mental disability who wants funding for an emergent or experimental treatment. As the petitioners were unable to show that other seekers of experimental
65:
Attorney
General of British Columbia and Medical Services Commission of British Columbia v. Connor Auton, an Infant, by his Guardian ad litem, Michelle Auton,and the said Michelle Auton in her personal capacity, Michelle Tamir, an Infant, by her Guardian ad litem, Sabrina Freeman, and the said
281:
The Court further rejected the possibility that people with autism were adversely discriminated against by the underinclusiveness of the legislation. Non-core medical services, McLachlin stated, are by their very nature underinclusive and cannot be considered discriminatory.
267:
218:
120:
286:
270:). However, here, she claimed, the benefit of "funding for all medically required treatment" is not guaranteed by law, as it is neither promised in the
349:
222:
344:
266:, writing for the Court, reiterated that the question here is whether the petitioners were denied a benefit in a discriminatory manner (see
260:
The Court unanimously decided that the refusal to fund the ABA/IBI treatment did not violate the children's section 15 equality rights.
354:
313:
17:
245:
98:
206:
359:
217:
wherein the Court ruled that government funding for non-core medically necessary treatments is not protected under
238:
300:
214:
45:
119:
Not providing government funding for all medically required treatment is not a discrimination protected by
326:
39:
308:
210:
263:
139:
271:
154:
304:
234:
94:
274:
nor any provincial health legislation. Rather, the Health Act only guarantees funding for
249:
170:
146:
290:
treatments are guaranteed funding, the Court rejected the claim on this basis as well.
338:
162:
150:
72:
194:
Iacobucci and Arbour JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
174:
166:
158:
233:
The parents of several children with autism brought an action against the
18:
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v. British
Columbia (Attorney General)
237:
government for failing to fund
Applied Behavioral Analysis (
285:
For a claim to succeed the petitioner must establish a
202:
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v
British Columbia (AG)
33:
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v
British Columbia (AG)
185:
180:
130:
113:
105:
89:
81:
71:
60:
53:
32:
241:), a form of therapy for children with autism.
8:
278:of which ABA/IBI for autism is not one.
319:
223:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
123:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
252:(under section 15) were not violated.
29:
7:
248:the Court found that the children's
327:SCC Case Information - Docket 29508
25:
350:Section Fifteen Charter case law
246:British Columbia Court of Appeal
99:British Columbia Court of Appeal
38:
1:
345:Supreme Court of Canada cases
213:is a leading decision of the
27:Supreme Court of Canada case
56:Judgment: November 19, 2004
376:
355:2004 in Canadian case law
244:Both at trial and in the
193:
135:
118:
77:3 S.C.R. 657, 2004 SCC 78
37:
314:LEAF (intervener) Factum
329:Supreme Court of Canada
301:Supreme Court of Canada
215:Supreme Court of Canada
46:Supreme Court of Canada
303:decision available at
54:Hearing: June 9, 2004
186:Unanimous reasons by
360:Disability case law
140:Beverley McLachlin
93:Judgement against
272:Canada Health Act
198:
197:
155:Michel Bastarache
16:(Redirected from
367:
330:
324:
287:comparator group
235:British Columbia
144:Puisne Justices:
131:Court membership
95:British Columbia
42:
30:
21:
375:
374:
370:
369:
368:
366:
365:
364:
335:
334:
333:
325:
321:
296:
258:
250:equality rights
231:
171:Marie Deschamps
147:Frank Iacobucci
142:
109:Appeal allowed.
55:
49:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
373:
371:
363:
362:
357:
352:
347:
337:
336:
332:
331:
318:
317:
316:
311:
295:
294:External links
292:
257:
254:
230:
227:
196:
195:
191:
190:
189:McLachlin C.J.
187:
183:
182:
178:
177:
137:Chief Justice:
133:
132:
128:
127:
116:
115:
111:
110:
107:
103:
102:
91:
87:
86:
83:
79:
78:
75:
69:
68:
62:
61:Full case name
58:
57:
51:
50:
43:
35:
34:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
372:
361:
358:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
342:
340:
328:
323:
320:
315:
312:
310:
306:
302:
299:Full text of
298:
297:
293:
291:
288:
283:
279:
277:
276:core services
273:
269:
265:
261:
255:
253:
251:
247:
242:
240:
236:
228:
226:
224:
220:
219:section 15(1)
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:
192:
188:
184:
181:Reasons given
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:Louise Arbour
160:
156:
152:
151:John C. Major
148:
145:
141:
138:
134:
129:
125:
124:
121:s. 15 of the
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
90:Prior history
88:
84:
80:
76:
74:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
48:
47:
41:
36:
31:
19:
322:
284:
280:
275:
262:
259:
243:
232:
201:
200:
199:
143:
136:
122:
64:
44:
211:2004 SCC 78
175:Morris Fish
167:Louis LeBel
339:Categories
229:Background
159:Ian Binnie
82:Docket No.
264:McLachlin
73:Citations
268:Law test
239:ABA/IBI
221:of the
114:Holding
97:in the
309:CanLII
256:Ruling
207:S.C.R.
106:Ruling
85:29508
305:LexUM
209:657,
205:, 3
307:and
169:,
341::
225:.
173:,
165:,
161:,
157:,
153:,
149:,
126:.
101:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
