Knowledge

Acoustic harassment device

Source 📝

71: 129: 117: 92:
keep seals from climbing into enclosures, gear modification to exclude certain species, and keeping aquaculture plants clean of dead fish have often been effective at solving the problem of keeping predatory species away. Reports indicate that in contrast to the harassment devices, the deterrent devices have been very effective in dealing with
61:
While they have proven effective over the short-term, animals tend to become conditioned over time and can even be drawn to the sounds once they habituate to the lack of real danger and the presence of sustenance. Only acoustic harassment devices that cause actual pain have been found to be effective
91:
Studies of long-term effects on the marine environment have not been carried out, including damage to non-targeted species. Results of the devices are mixed, and they have proved ineffective in some circumstances, especially over the long term, while design improvements such as electric fences to
144:
Acoustic devices have been used for military purposes including to stress enemies, as an aid in interrogation, and to create "an infrasonic sound barrier". The British Army used "Squawk Boxes" to emit ultrasonic frequencies causing various discomforts. Audio harassment was also used by the U.S.
83:
sounding screams broadcast between 12 and 17 kHz. Acoustic deterrent devices normally broadcast near 10 kHz and use high volume. The intensity level of acoustic harassment devices has been measured up to 194 dB re 1uPa @ 1 m and the noise can be audible up to 50 kilometers away.
82:
Primitive harassment methods included firecrackers, rubber bullets, chasing animals by boat, banging pipes and seal bombs (incendiary devices). Devices emitting loud noises have also been used, including broadcasts of killer whale sounds, pingers, and acoustic buzzers. These often employ shrill
45:
facilities and to keep birds away from certain areas (for instance in the vicinity of airports and blueberry fields). The devices have also been employed to keep marine mammals away from fishing nets. The devices are known as
62:
over the longer term. The devices can cause hearing damage in non-targeted species and design changes in the fishing gear, fishing methods, and fish farm design to provide a permanent solution are preferable.
382:
A Study Into the Effectiveness of Acoustic Harassment Devices-AHDs in Deterring Seals from Salmon Farms Around Shetland by Rachel Beacham Aberdeen University: Dissertation. M. Sc Marine and Fisheries Science
102:
A new technique called "startle technology" is currently in development. Preliminary trials conducted by the University of St. Andrews shows great promise as a substitute for ADDs.
58:, which are smaller AHDs or intended as an awareness tool to warn species to the presence of danger rather than as a tool of harassment at a much louder level. 156: 346:
Evaluating and Assessing the Relative Effectiveness of Acoustic Deterrent Devices and other Non-Lethal Measures on Marine Mammals (2014) (
193:, loud music was broadcast. Devices utilising the deterioration of hearing with age have been deployed to drive younger people away, e.g. 366: 37:
are technologies used to keep animals and in some cases humans away from an area. Applications of the technology are used to keep
322: 310: 99:
Recent research shows that acoustic deterrent devices intended to scare off seals do not work, but they do scare off porpoises.
273: 395: 298: 258: 334:
Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals: species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds.
216: 206: 167: 70: 400: 121: 274:
Conflicts Between Protected Species and Fisheries: Social Science Research and Policy Approaches
227: 335: 93: 259:
Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals edited by William F. Perrin, Bernd Wursig, J. G.M. Thewissen
17: 128: 182: 151: 389: 38: 347: 222: 211: 194: 137: 111: 78:) used to repel cetaceans (including dolphins and porpoises) away from fishing nets 75: 232: 190: 146: 42: 116: 186: 136:(long range audio devices) is deploying them to prevent people from entering 171: 160: 276:
Riku Varjopuro, Nordic Council of Ministers, 2003 - Ecosystem management
174: 367:
Bad Vibrations: The History of the Idea of Music as a Cause of Disease
27:
Acoustic technologies used to keep animals or humans away from an area
178: 127: 115: 69: 164: 133: 124:, an acoustic hailing device used for crowd and riot control 336:
http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/7/170286
323:
Marine Mammals: Fisheries, Tourism and Management Issues
155:
as helicopters descend on the enemy with loud speakers.
170:
that could be heard 2.5 miles away and was used on the
106:Acoustic devices and acoustic weapon use on humans 149:and was famously depicted in the fictional movie 348:http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2014/10/8271/8 301:edited by Robert R. Stickney and James P. McVey 8: 325:by Nick Gales, Mark Hindell, Roger Kirkwood 269: 267: 254: 252: 250: 248: 244: 362: 360: 358: 356: 294: 292: 290: 288: 286: 284: 282: 159:broadcast voices purported to be dead 7: 233:Bird scarer § auditory scarers 120:Law enforcement officer holding a 25: 163:. Other examples include the 350 299:Responsible Marine Aquaculture 1: 313:by Malcolm Beveridge page 274 48:acoustic harassment devices 417: 217:Long Range Acoustic Device 109: 56:acoustic deterrent devices 18:Acoustic deterrent devices 157:Operation Wandering Soul 207:Acoustic Hailing Device 181:where ousted president 185:was in refuge. At the 141: 125: 79: 187:Branch Davidian siege 131: 119: 73: 74:An acoustic pinger ( 369:by Dr James Kennawa 35:acoustic deterrents 31:Acoustic harassment 396:Non-lethal weapons 168:HPS-1 Sound System 142: 126: 80: 228:Directional sound 16:(Redirected from 408: 370: 364: 351: 344: 338: 332: 326: 320: 314: 311:Cage Aquaculture 308: 302: 296: 277: 271: 262: 256: 145:military in the 94:cetacean bycatch 21: 416: 415: 411: 410: 409: 407: 406: 405: 386: 385: 379: 377:Further reading 374: 373: 365: 354: 345: 341: 333: 329: 321: 317: 309: 305: 297: 280: 272: 265: 257: 246: 241: 203: 114: 108: 89: 68: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 414: 412: 404: 403: 398: 388: 387: 384: 383: 378: 375: 372: 371: 352: 339: 327: 315: 303: 278: 263: 243: 242: 240: 237: 236: 235: 230: 225: 220: 214: 209: 202: 199: 183:Manuel Noriega 152:Apocalypse Now 110:Main article: 107: 104: 88: 85: 67: 64: 39:marine mammals 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 413: 402: 399: 397: 394: 393: 391: 381: 380: 376: 368: 363: 361: 359: 357: 353: 349: 343: 340: 337: 331: 328: 324: 319: 316: 312: 307: 304: 300: 295: 293: 291: 289: 287: 285: 283: 279: 275: 270: 268: 264: 260: 255: 253: 251: 249: 245: 238: 234: 231: 229: 226: 224: 221: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 204: 200: 198: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 169: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153: 148: 139: 135: 130: 123: 118: 113: 105: 103: 100: 97: 95: 86: 84: 77: 72: 65: 63: 59: 57: 53: 49: 44: 40: 36: 32: 19: 342: 330: 318: 306: 223:Sonic weapon 212:The Mosquito 195:The Mosquito 150: 143: 138:line of fire 112:Sonic weapon 101: 98: 90: 81: 76:active sonar 60: 55: 51: 47: 34: 30: 29: 191:Waco, Texas 147:Vietnam War 132:One use of 122:Hypershield 87:Assessments 43:aquaculture 390:Categories 239:References 41:away from 401:Acoustics 261:page 442 201:See also 161:Vietcong 175:embassy 172:Vatican 66:History 219:(LRAD) 179:Panama 54:) and 140:areas 134:LRADs 165:watt 52:AHDs 33:and 189:in 177:in 392:: 355:^ 281:^ 266:^ 247:^ 197:. 96:. 350:) 50:( 20:)

Index

Acoustic deterrent devices
marine mammals
aquaculture

active sonar
cetacean bycatch
Sonic weapon

Hypershield

LRADs
line of fire
Vietnam War
Apocalypse Now
Operation Wandering Soul
Vietcong
watt
HPS-1 Sound System
Vatican
embassy
Panama
Manuel Noriega
Branch Davidian siege
Waco, Texas
The Mosquito
Acoustic Hailing Device
The Mosquito
Long Range Acoustic Device
Sonic weapon
Directional sound

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.