133:
27:
293:
In
September 1941, Jehovah's Witnesses applied to the High Court for an injunction to restrain the Commonwealth from further trespassing on their premises, and seeking damages. The Witnesses argued that the regulations contravened the express constitutional protections for freedom from religious
302:
The
Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the
44:
461:
456:
486:
91:
63:
245:
the power under the regulations to seize any building containing property connected to a subversive association was beyond the
Commonwealth's defence powers under
312:
70:
471:
295:
77:
246:
491:
59:
451:
446:
84:
496:
110:
311:
1940 did not infringe against section 116, but that the government had exceeded the scope of the
Commonwealth's "defence power" in
466:
48:
333:
481:
197:
37:
476:
427:
368:
279:
268:
236:
213:
143:
283:
410:
397:
320:
194:
380:
286:
to be "prejudicial to the defence of the
Commonwealth" and to the "efficient prosecution of the
209:
415:
356:
171:
132:
419:
360:
175:
324:. In that case, the protections afforded by section 116 had been defined very narrowly.
440:
205:
154:
Adelaide
Company of Jehovah's Witnesses Incorporated v The Commonwealth of Australia
287:
201:
26:
264:
318:
This was only the second case to consider section 116. The first had been
216:
20:
290:". Police immediately occupied premises of the organisation.
309:
National
Security (Subversive Organisations) Regulations
276:
National
Security (Subversive Organisations) Regulations
233:
National
Security (Subversive Associations) Regulations
60:"Adelaide Co of Jehovah's Witnesses Inc v Commonwealth"
353:
Adelaide Co of
Jehovah's Witnesses Inc v Commonwealth
260:
Adelaide Co of Jehovah's Witnesses Inc v Commonwealth
126:
Adelaide Co of Jehovah's Witnesses Inc v Commonwealth
222:
190:
185:
167:
159:
149:
139:
125:
51:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
462:Defence power in the Australian Constitution cases
421:
362:
177:
300:
8:
457:Rights in the Australian Constitution cases
394:Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
296:section 116 of the Australian Constitution
131:
122:
111:Learn how and when to remove this message
487:Christianity and law in the 20th century
274:In January 1941, acting pursuant to the
16:Judgement of the High Court of Australia
345:
235:did not contravene section 116 of the
7:
307:The court unanimously held that the
49:adding citations to reliable sources
14:
25:
492:Law about religion in Australia
36:needs additional citations for
472:Jehovah's Witnesses litigation
1:
452:Australian constitutional law
447:High Court of Australia cases
334:Australian constitutional law
294:discrimination contained in
513:
381:National Security Act 1939
249:(vi) of the Constitution
227:
130:
497:20th century in Adelaide
426: (15 October 1912),
280:Government of Australia
269:High Court of Australia
237:Australian Constitution
144:High Court of Australia
467:1943 in Australian law
305:
416:[1912] HCA 65
367: (14 June 1943),
357:[1943] HCA 12
315:of the Constitution.
172:[1943] HCA 12
176:(1943) 67
45:improve this article
482:History of Adelaide
284:Jehovah's Witnesses
411:Krygger v Williams
321:Krygger v Williams
271:on 14 June 1943.
256:
255:
252:
241:
121:
120:
113:
95:
504:
477:1943 in case law
431:
423:
407:
401:
391:
385:
377:
371:
364:
350:
298:, which states:
250:
239:
186:Court membership
179:
135:
123:
116:
109:
105:
102:
96:
94:
53:
29:
21:
512:
511:
507:
506:
505:
503:
502:
501:
437:
436:
435:
434:
408:
404:
392:
388:
378:
374:
351:
347:
342:
330:
267:decided in the
117:
106:
100:
97:
54:
52:
42:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
510:
508:
500:
499:
494:
489:
484:
479:
474:
469:
464:
459:
454:
449:
439:
438:
433:
432:
402:
386:
372:
344:
343:
341:
338:
337:
336:
329:
326:
313:section 51(vi)
254:
253:
225:
224:
220:
219:
192:
191:Judges sitting
188:
187:
183:
182:
169:
165:
164:
161:
157:
156:
151:
150:Full case name
147:
146:
141:
137:
136:
128:
127:
119:
118:
33:
31:
24:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
509:
498:
495:
493:
490:
488:
485:
483:
480:
478:
475:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
453:
450:
448:
445:
444:
442:
429:
425:
417:
413:
412:
406:
403:
399:
395:
390:
387:
383:
382:
376:
373:
370:
366:
358:
354:
349:
346:
339:
335:
332:
331:
327:
325:
323:
322:
316:
314:
310:
304:
303:Commonwealth.
299:
297:
291:
289:
285:
281:
277:
272:
270:
266:
262:
261:
248:
244:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:Case opinions
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
193:
189:
184:
181:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
142:
138:
134:
129:
124:
115:
112:
104:
101:November 2015
93:
90:
86:
83:
79:
76:
72:
69:
65:
62: –
61:
57:
56:Find sources:
50:
46:
40:
39:
34:This article
32:
28:
23:
22:
19:
409:
405:
393:
389:
379:
375:
352:
348:
319:
317:
308:
306:
301:
292:
275:
273:
263:was a court
259:
258:
257:
251:(per curiam)
242:
240:(per curiam)
232:
228:
163:14 June 1943
153:
107:
98:
88:
81:
74:
67:
55:
43:Please help
38:verification
35:
18:
441:Categories
428:High Court
420:(1912) 15
398:s 116
369:High Court
361:(1943) 67
340:References
278:1940, the
71:newspapers
282:declared
210:McTiernan
180: 116
168:Citations
328:See also
214:Williams
160:Decided
85:scholar
396:(Cth)
384:(Cth).
212:&
206:Starke
195:Latham
87:
80:
73:
66:
58:
414:
355:
243:(5:0)
229:(5:0)
140:Court
92:JSTOR
78:books
265:case
231:the
202:Rich
64:news
424:366
422:CLR
365:116
363:CLR
288:war
247:s51
178:CLR
47:by
443::
418:,
359:,
217:JJ
208:,
204:,
200:,
198:CJ
174:,
430:.
400:.
114:)
108:(
103:)
99:(
89:·
82:·
75:·
68:·
41:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
