Knowledge (XXG)

FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

Source đź“ť

582:—issued an order regarding the stay motion. In a 2–1 decision, it partially stayed Judge Kacsmaryk's order by allowing the FDA's original 2000 approval of mifepristone to stand, ruling that too much time had passed to challenge the ruling. However, the order did not stay Kacsmaryk's order insofar as it struck down hold changes to the REMS for mifepristone issued by the FDA in 2016 that had made the drug easier to obtain, including through the mail, and extended the allowed use of the drug from seven to ten weeks of pregnancy. The opinion stated that "it would be difficult for to argue that" the 2016 changes to the REMS "were so critical to the public given that the Nation operated—and mifepristone was administered to millions of women—without them for sixteen years following the" original approval, and thus that that was no reason to put them on hold. Judge Haynes noted that she would grant an administrative stay of Kacsmaryk's order in full. 47: 799:
who suffered complications from using mifepristone were also rejected, as Kavanaugh wrote "Federal law fully protects doctors against being required to provide abortions or other medical treatment against their consciences — and therefore breaks any chain of causation between FDA’s relaxed regulation of mifepristone and any asserted conscience injuries to the doctors." He also stated that doctors "have never had standing to challenge FDA drug approvals simply on the theory that use of the drug by
311:, the Fifth Circuit partially reverted Kacsmaryk's injunction, allowing the drug's 2000 approval to stand, but putting on hold changes to the FDA's distribution rules on the drug that were put in place in 2016, including distribution by mail. A separate Washington federal district judge also issued on April 7, 2023, a separate injunction forcing the FDA to maintain the distribution of mifepristone in 16 states and the District of Columbia. On April 13, that judge issued 812:. Association standing allows for an association representing members of a class with standing to bring the case to court. Thomas stated that this concept may be unconstitutional that should be reviewed in a more appropriate case. He wrote, "If a single member of an association has suffered an injury, our doctrine permits that association to seek relief for its entire membership - even if the association has tens of millions of other, non-injured members." 783:
Oral arguments were held on March 26, 2024. Court observers found the a majority of the justices appeared to support the FDA's assertion that the Alliance lacked standing to challenge the law, a view taken by the three more-liberal justices Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson, joined by Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Justices Alito and Thomas were seen to support that there was standing and asked questions related to the rationale for overriding the FDA.
518:
represented some doctors to whom the injured women and girls might turn; that this would harm the doctors who had to care for those patients; and that that harm to the doctors was "sufficiently imminent" and there was a "'substantial risk' that the harm will occur". As the organizations were doctors' groups, he also ruled that they had
691:. Kacsmaryk is a "devout Christian" and reliably conservative judge, who has struck down several Biden administration policies on issues of immigration, LGBT rights, and abortion. AHM filed the case in Amarillo, Texas, which belongs to the Amarillo Division, where Kacsmaryk is the only judge, leading to accusations of " 798:
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the opinion, stating that while the Alliance may have moral and policy concerns on mifepristone, because they did not prescribe mifepristone, they failed to demonstrate a legally cognizable injury to challenge its use. The Alliance's claims that it might treat patients
782:
Both the FDA and Danco petitioned to the Supreme Court to challenge the Fifth Circuit's ruling. The court certified both petitions, consolidated under the FDA's challenge, and limited the case to the question of standing, and of the appropriateness of the FDA rule changes in 2016, 2021, and, 2023.
773:
of mifepristone, stated that, should the FDA be forced to remove mifepristone from the market, it would need to go through certain procedural requirements to reverse their prior approval of the drug, or otherwise GenBioPro's product would be mislabeled on the market. Legal experts were unclear how
732:
Kacsmaryk had written that women who went through abortions "often experience shame, regret, anxiety, depression, drug abuse, and suicidal thoughts because of the abortion", but did not cite any studies reporting the opposite. One study highlighting mental issues stemming from abortion, as well as
373:
In March 2016, the FDA loosened safety precautions present in the original approval, allowing medical practitioners to also prescribe the drug, and increased the time into the pregnancy term when the drug could be used. In April 2021, in response to the lack of access to medical care caused by the
517:
to sue—the legal right to bring a case before a judge. He held that because mifepristone can cause serious complications to pregnant women and girls, they might need to go to a doctor for treatment; that abortion providers generally do not treat such cases; that the associations bringing the case
745:
In his ruling, Kacsmaryk cited a Finnish study that the "overall incidence of adverse events is 'fourfold higher' in chemical abortions when compared to surgical abortions", but one of the study's authors, gynecology professor Oskari Heikinheimo, disagreed with how Kacsmaryk portrayed the study;
741:
for having incomplete data. The American Psychological Association instead reported: "Large longitudinal and international studies have found that obtaining a wanted abortion does not increase risk for depression, anxiety, or suicidal thoughts." Kacsmaryk did not discuss potential psychological
710:
scientific ways." In describing the action of the pill, he said that mifepristone is used to "to kill the unborn human" and that it "ultimately starves the unborn human until death." Kacsmaryk also referred to doctors who provide abortion pills as "abortionists," and called medication abortion
762:
of the Eastern District of Washington, ruled in a separate lawsuit that the FDA should refrain from any actions to reduce the availability of the drug in 16 states and the District of Columbia. The Washington lawsuit had been raised due to changes in the REMS for mifepristone in January 2023,
410:
The lead plaintiff, the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), describes itself as "uphold and promot the fundamental principles of Hippocratic medicine", which "include protecting the vulnerable at the beginning and end of life." AHM was incorporated in August 2022 and is headquartered in
530:—which would normally have started in 2016, when one of the plaintiff's review petitions was rejected—was "reopened" in 2016 and again in 2021, when the FDA increased access to the drug. He finally ruled that the approval of mifepristone was "otherwise not in accordance with law"—citing the 640:, ruled on August 16, 2023, to maintain the ban on mifepristone's availability that had come about from the 2016 FDA rule changes, ruling the FDA did not properly consider health factors in that decision. The ban remained on hold with the federal government appealing the decision to the 378:, the FDA allowed mifepristone to be obtained by mail from certified medical businesses and practitioners, which greatly increased access to the drug. Another REMS change was made in January 2023, allowing pharmacies approved by mifepristone manufacturers to also distribute the drug. 828:, which establishes procedures for the federal courts, established a new rule that challenges to state or federal laws with national impacts filed within federal districts would be randomly assigned to a judge within the entire district, aiming to prevent aggressive judge shopping. 506:. Ahead of an in-person hearing on the case, Kacsmaryk delayed entering the hearing on the court docket, citing concerns about potential protests over the hearing. After this information was leaked, the date was posted and the hearing took place as scheduled, on March 15, 2023. 370:(REMS) to identify the benefits and risks of any approved drug and give the FDA more control over adjusting their approvals of drugs. By the time the FDA completed the REMS for mifepristone in 2011, it kept the same limits on access at hospitals and other medical facilities. 549:
that claimed there was potential harm to the woman when taking milepristone. Sage retracted these two papers in February 2024 over two issues. First, they stated that their primary author, James Studnicki of the Charlotte Lozier Institute, itself the research branch of the
619:
or significant record), stating: "I did not agree with these criticisms at the time, but if they were warranted in the cases in which they were made, they are emphatically true here" in this lawsuit. Alito added that his dissent did not analyze the merits of the lawsuit.
611:, in which he argued that, even if the Supreme Court restricted access to mifepristone, the FDA could refuse to enforce that decision and continue allowing access to mifepristone while the lawsuit continued. Alito also referred to previous lawsuits' criticisms of the ' 357:
Under the 2000 approval, mifepristone was approved by the FDA under Congressional regulations granted to them by Subpart H of the FDA's mandate. This included restricted distribution of mifepristone through hospitals and other medical facilities. With passage of the
312: 729:, and also "cites research based on anonymous blog posts, cherry picks statistics that exaggerate the negative physical and psychological effects of mifepristone, and ignores hundreds of scientific studies attesting to the medication's safety." 554:
organization, did not properly cite his potential conflict of interest in performing the studies. Second, Sage found from a second independent review of the works that there were "fundamental problems" with the studies' approach.
423:—in addition to four doctors. The plaintiffs argued that the FDA did not properly consider all evidence at the time of the 2000 approval of mifepristone, and sought relief by having the court revoke the FDA's approval. 763:
restricting the previously open access of the drug. The states argued that not only was the January 2023 REMS change too restrictive, but other parts of the current REMS were unnecessary and should be lifted.
594:
enacted a temporary administrative stay on the District Court's decision while the Supreme Court considered the case. Alito originally set the stay to last until April 19, then later extended it to April 21.
2800: 598:
On April 21, 2023, a majority of the Supreme Court, without comment, voted to stay the lower court decisions that would restrict access to mifepristone, pending the decision of the Fifth Circuit on the
499: 397:
and held that there was no constitutional right to abortion, which enabled states to ban abortion. In order to restrict abortions, several states also passed laws to prevent the sale of mifepristone.
680:(D–WA), cautioned that the government should allow the appeals process to proceed before taking any action to avoid risking the judicial process. Some Republicans praised the decision, like Senator 766:
Following the Fifth Circuit's April 12 ruling, Judge Rice declared in a new order that the Fifth Circuit's stay decision does not override his order for D.C. and the 16 state-parties in his case.
330:
to bring a case, since neither AHM nor the groups it represented had shown injury. The decision reversed the lower court decisions, restoring mifepristone's availability under current FDA rules.
284:
procedures. The plaintiffs, led by the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), argued that the FDA did not properly approve the use of the drug mifepristone for pregnancy termination under
1074: 908:
case are Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Nevada, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, D.C., Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania.
806:
Thomas wrote a concurring option that agreed that the Alliance did not have standing, but also challenged the concept of association standing that was argued, based on the 1977 case
808: 737:, an anti-abortion website run by the Institute of Reproductive Grief Care. Another study that was cited by Kacsmaryk regarding suicide after abortion had been criticized by the 102: 564: 471: 359: 2082: 590:
Both the Justice Department and Danco Laboratories appealed the restrictions on mifepristone to the Supreme Court on April 14, 2023. Later that day, Supreme Court Justice
2122: 538:—and ordered the FDA to suspend the drug's approval until a later date. He then stayed his own order for seven days to allow the government time to appeal his decision. 2244: 1795: 930: 769:
A separate lawsuit was filed by GenBioPro against the FDA shortly after the FDA had sought a stay on the Fifth Circuit's decision. GenBioPro, the manufacturers of the
2805: 387: 327: 290: 2830: 2815: 2348: 746:
Heikinheimo stated that the same study showed that serious complications were remarkably low for both types of abortions, while most of the "adverse events" were
1621: 2612: 2586: 1034: 1168: 523: 300:
and asserted there was no constitutional right to abortion at the federal level, leading conservative states and groups to further restrict abortion access.
288:
regulations and asked for an injunction to withdraw the drug's approval, thus removing it from the market. AHM's suit followed the Supreme Court's ruling in
1854: 792: 338:
Medication abortion, in which prescription medications are used to induce abortion of the embryo, typically occurs with a mixture of two different drugs—
2400: 1663: 1442: 1147: 1093: 1593: 1572: 1419: 1997: 824:, filed within a specific division of the district as to have the case likely assigned to a specific judge from that division. On March 12, 2024, the 420: 415:. Other plaintiffs include three out-of-state anti-abortion groups—the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG), the 367: 1207:
Kortsmith, Katherine; Nguyen, Antoinette T.; Mandel, Michele G.; Clark, Elizabeth; Hollier, Lisa M.; Rodenhizer, Jessica; Whiteman, Maura K. (2022).
1055: 2810: 2515: 1526: 1398: 825: 628:
The case was put on an accelerated schedule, with the Fifth Circuit holding oral arguments on May 17. The Fifth Circuit panel, consisting of judges
2153: 2825: 2820: 1968: 467: 459: 2487: 719:
wrote that Kacsmaryk's ruling "strays from offering accurate health information from some of the largest medical organizations in the nation".
2284: 1828: 1377: 1337: 2795: 2687: 2573: 2103: 1213: 2218: 363: 285: 2320: 2020: 1463: 672:(D–NY), called for the Biden administration to ignore the ruling and continue to distribute mifepristone, while others, such as Senators 2674:
Grossi, Peter, O'Connor, D. (2023) "FDA preemption of conflicting state drug regulation and the looming battle over abortion medications
1738: 1644: 738: 319: 51: 952: 872: 551: 416: 2461: 2254: 795:
standing to challenge the FDA's approval or rule making. The decision reversed the Fifth Circuit ruling and lifted the injunction.
2381: 1484: 1360: 1888: 509:
On April 7, 2023, Kacsmaryk issued his opinion finding primarily in favor of the plaintiffs, and issued an order granting AHM's
982: 2132: 1267: 857: 2358: 1192: 1119: 447: 351: 307:
issued a preliminary injunction suspending the approval of mifepristone on April 7, 2023; on appeal by the government to the
939: 1916: 1712: 1942: 657: 2063: 1686: 1547: 1505: 347: 273: 70: 2041: 2541: 1862: 641: 382: 1629: 1399:"The FDA's power to approve drugs faces sweeping challenge in lawsuit seeking to pull abortion pill from U.S. market" 887:
Intervenor Danco Laboratories and the federal defendants filed separate appeals to the Supreme Court. The cases are
725:
described Kacsmaryk's ruling as repeatedly citing data collected from researchers affiliated with the anti-abortion
726: 652:
The Texas lower court decision has been widely criticized by Democratic politicians, such as House minority leader
427: 2423: 1288: 563:
On April 10, 2023, the Department of Justice and Danco Laboratories filed an emergency motion for a stay with the
603:
of the lawsuit, and a potential appeal of that decision. How every justice voted was not detailed, but Justices
1293: 669: 2442: 2219:"Judge's abortion pill decision embraces extreme language and ideology of anti-abortion movement, experts say" 733:
women receiving "insufficient information" on abortion, had its data collected from anonymous blog posts from
2408: 1671: 1101: 2779: 2775: 2771: 1427: 699: 2005: 133: 2574:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-courts-thomas-questions-ability-groups-challenge-us-laws-2024-06-13/
2554: 527: 510: 86: 82: 2294: 607:
and Alito publicly dissented, wanting to approve the restrictions. Alito was the only justice to write a
166:
Plaintiffs lack Article III standing to challenge FDA’s actions regarding the regulation of mifepristone.
2187: 1552: 633: 233: 97: 17: 1378:"In Texas lawsuit seeking to reverse FDA approval of abortion pills, state attorneys general weigh in" 1893: 1598: 519: 503: 304: 2462:"Generic abortion pill maker GenBioPro sues FDA over its response to orders halting drug's approval" 2641: 2289: 2249: 1764: 1347: 721: 435: 2712: 2654: 1796:"Supreme Court says abortion pill mifepristone will remain broadly available during legal battle" 1468: 1015: 934: 698:
Media outlets noted that Kacsmaryk's opinion contained several instances of language employed by
608: 575: 482: 478: 463: 315:, purporting to force FDA to maintain approval regardless of the Texas or Fifth Circuit ruling. 1943:"Appeals court imposes restrictions on abortion pill, but drug will stay on the market for now" 2755: 2704: 2667: 2663: 1556: 1248: 1230: 1120:"The Supreme Court will decide the future of the abortion pill. A timeline of how we got here" 1007: 999: 375: 225: 2104:"Meet the federal judge set to rule in a case that could disrupt access to the abortion pill" 2745: 2737: 2696: 2353: 1577: 1531: 1238: 1222: 991: 747: 687:
Attention was drawn to Judge Kacsmaryk, who was nominated to the bench in 2017 by President
681: 571: 541:
Kacsmaryk's opinion relied heavily on two scientific studies that had been published in the
281: 1527:"The Lawless Ruling Against the Abortion Pill Has Already Prompted a Constitutional Crisis" 1187: 2644:
76 (forthcoming 2024), University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2023-12,
2192: 791:
The court issued its unanimous decision on June 13, 2024, ruling that the Alliance lacked
715: 706:", stating: "Jurists often use the word 'fetus' to inaccurately identify unborn humans in 653: 604: 542: 412: 221: 201: 189: 1713:"Supreme Court asked to block ruling that threatens access to abortion pill mifepristone" 844:
FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine was consolidated with the simultaneous petition
820:
The original case, filed on the Northern District of Texas, was considered an example of
513:, suspending the FDA's approval of the drug. He first concluded that the plaintiffs have 2083:"How an obscure Christian right activist became one of the most powerful men in America" 702:. He deliberately chose to use the terms "unborn human" and "unborn child" in place of " 2750: 2725: 2488:"Supreme Court seems likely to preserve access to the abortion medication mifepristone" 1765:"Supreme Court extends order preserving access to abortion pill mifepristone to Friday" 1243: 821: 759: 692: 661: 637: 514: 474: 455: 323: 148:
Whether respondents have Article III standing to challenge FDA's 2016 and 2021 actions.
1208: 2789: 2716: 2087: 1342: 1268:"A federal judge could soon block access to an abortion pill. Here's what that means" 1152: 1019: 673: 616: 612: 579: 535: 451: 308: 2443:"Federal court rules 17 states, D.C. are not impacted by Texas abortion pill ruling" 1485:"What to know about the lawsuit aiming to ban medication abortion drug mifepristone" 272:, 602 U.S. 367 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case to challenge the U.S. 2542:
https://www.courthousenews.com/supreme-court-throws-out-challenge-to-abortion-pill/
2283:
Weber, Lauren; McGinley, Laurie; Ovalle, David; Sellers, Frances (April 13, 2023).
2127: 1510: 1169:"How the judge who could ban the abortion pill won confirmation in the U.S. Senate" 770: 688: 677: 591: 531: 339: 277: 213: 197: 181: 1889:"Supreme Court pauses abortion pill restrictions from taking effect during appeal" 1664:"Court Says Abortion Pill Can Remain Available but Imposes Temporary Restrictions" 695:", where plaintiffs select legal venues most likely to deliver favorable rulings. 2587:"Federal courts make it harder to 'judge-shop' as was done in abortion pill case" 1687:"Appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules" 1739:"Supreme Court Justice Alito issues administrative stay of abortion pill ruling" 1420:"12 States Sue F.D.A., Seeking Removal of Special Restrictions on Abortion Pill" 629: 600: 393: 343: 296: 209: 2640:
Cohen, David S., Donley, Greer, and Rebouché, Rachel (2023). "Abortion Pills".
1506:"Access to abortion pill in the balance as Texas judge hears mifepristone case" 969: 570:
Late on April 12, 2023, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit—consisting of
2424:"With Dueling Rulings, Abortion Pill Cases Appear Headed to the Supreme Court" 1443:"Reversing abortion drug's approval would harm public interest, U.S. FDA says" 1308: 322:
ruled unanimously on June 13, 2024 that the Alliance did not have association
2613:"Republicans will no longer get to handpick their judges when they sue Biden" 2021:"Ignore the courts? Some Democrats say Texas abortion pill ruling demands it" 1234: 1003: 1338:"The Shadow Medical Community Behind the Attempt to Ban Medication Abortion" 1075:"Medical Groups Ask FDA To Ease Access To Abortion Pill During The Pandemic" 665: 2759: 2708: 1252: 1226: 1011: 350:(FDA) in September 2000. Medication abortion accounts for over half of all 2741: 1855:"Here's what the Supreme Court abortion pill ruling means and what's next" 2520: 2382:"Rival rulings on medication abortion hypercharge the post-Roe legal war" 2025: 1769: 1382: 1272: 995: 114: 2700: 2492: 1972: 1594:"Journal publisher retracts abortion pill studies cited by Texas judge" 1571:
Weber, Paul J.; Perrone, Matthew; Lindsay, Whitehurst (April 8, 2023).
1447: 968:
Zettler, Patricia J.; Adashi, Eli Y.; Cohen, I. Glenn (March 9, 2023).
2679: 2285:"Unpacking the flawed science cited in the Texas abortion pill ruling" 1969:"Biden administration takes abortion-pill dispute to US Supreme Court" 1917:"Appeals court appears likely to restrict access to key abortion pill" 874:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
859:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
27:
Court case challenging the legality of medication abortion in the U.S.
2401:"Judge Invalidates F.D.A. Approval of the Abortion Pill Mifepristone" 426:
The plaintiffs are represented by the Christian legal advocacy group
2645: 2321:"'Unborn human': the anti-abortion rhetoric of Texas judge's ruling" 2154:"'Unborn human': the anti-abortion rhetoric of Texas judge's ruling" 931:"Where Restrictions on Abortion Pills Could Matter Most in the U.S." 1998:"Reaction to Texas Abortion Pill Ruling: Outrage, and Muted Praise" 1645:"DOJ asks appeals court for emergency stay of abortion pill ruling" 1056:"Legal Challenges to the FDA Approval of Medication Abortion Pills" 1915:
Marimow, Ann E; Kitchener, Caroline; Stein, Perry (May 17, 2023).
1148:"Abortion Providers Gear Up for Judge's Ruling Over Pill Approval" 1054:
Sobel, Laurie; Salganicoff, Alina; Felix, Mabel (March 13, 2023).
703: 151:
Whether FDA's 2016 and 2021 actions were arbitrary and capricious.
2123:"The Legal Decision That Could Rewrite the Abortion Battle—Again" 893:
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
269:
Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
2555:"Supreme Court rejects challenge to abortion pill accessibility" 1403: 2516:"Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill" 1853:
Stein, Perry; Amber, Phillips; Ovalle, David (April 21, 2023).
1361:
Franchise Tax Account Status, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
846:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
500:
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
154:
Whether the district court properly granted preliminary relief.
46: 40:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
2770:. Legal analysis of the Texas District Court initial opinion ( 2559: 2325: 1489: 1124: 1094:"F.D.A. Will Allow Abortion Pills by Mail During the Pandemic" 1039: 1035:"A Drug That Eases Miscarriages Is Difficult For Women To Get" 742:
effects for women who wanted an abortion and were denied one.
2245:"Texas judge delivers on the hopes of his antiabortion world" 774:
GenBioPro's lawsuit would interact with the two other suits.
2766:
Unikowsky, Adam (2023). "Mifepristone and the rule of law".
2652:
Donley, Greer (2022). "Medication Abortion Exceptionalism".
1464:"The Far Right Is Funding Evangelical Super Bowl Sunday Ads" 889:
Danco Laboratories, LLC v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine
1289:"Medication abortions are under fire: Here's how they work" 2062:
Kitchener, Caroline; Marimow, Ann E. (February 25, 2023).
1573:"Access to abortion pill in limbo after competing rulings" 481:, the manufacturer of brand-name mifepristone (Mifeprex), 1829:"Supreme Court preserves access to abortion pill for now" 929:
McCann, Allison; Walker, Amy Schoenfeld (March 2, 2023).
2726:"Mifepristone, preemption, and public health federalism" 2042:"Dueling Decisions Leave Abortion Pill's Fate Uncertain" 978:
s Collateral Consequences for Pharmaceutical Regulation"
130:
All. for Hippocratic Med. v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin.
2685:
Rebouché, Rachel (2022). "Remote Reproductive Rights".
2064:"The Texas judge who could take down the abortion pill" 1887:
Schnonfield, Zach; Weixel, Nathaniel (April 21, 2023).
1188:"Medication Abortion: New Litigation May Affect Access" 567:, asking the court to stay the district court's order. 2801:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
2349:"Texas judge's rationale on abortion misses the truth" 73:, et al.; v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, et al. 1363:. Texas Office of the Comptroller. December 22, 2022. 1146:
Castronuovo, Celine; Lopez, Ian (February 10, 2023).
809:
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
1622:"Here's What Happens Next in the Abortion Pill Case" 1287:
Tanner, Lindsey; Perrone, Matthew (March 15, 2023).
565:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
547:
Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology
2057: 2055: 1643:Mallin, Alexander; Cathey, Libby (April 10, 2023). 1548:"Two (Wrong) Mifepristone Court Rulings in One Day" 953:
FDA Approval Memorandum re: Mifeprex (mifepristone)
684:(R–MS), although there were not as many responses. 360:
Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
257: 246: 241: 170: 160: 140: 125: 120: 110: 92: 78: 65: 58: 37: 2774:) and the Fifth Circuit's emergency stay opinion ( 1331: 1329: 1033:Gordon, Mara; McCammon, Sarah (January 10, 2019). 2422:VanSickle, Abbie; Belluck, Pam (April 8, 2023). 2217:Atkins, Chloe; Arkin, Daniel (April 11, 2023). 1996:Astor, Maggie; Chen, David W. (April 7, 2023). 1685:Weber, Paul; Gresko, Jessica (April 13, 2023). 1113: 1111: 1620:Belluck, Pam; Liptak, Adam (April 12, 2023). 1209:"Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2020" 891:, No. 22A901 (U.S. filed April 14, 2023) and 8: 1991: 1989: 758:Within an hour of Kacsmaryk's ruling, Judge 388:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 291:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 430:(ADF). The ADF drafted the law at issue in 2724:Zettler, Patricia J.; et al. (2022). 1822: 1820: 1818: 1816: 1789: 1787: 34: 2749: 2278: 2276: 2274: 2272: 2148: 2146: 2144: 2142: 2040:Brown, Elizabeth Nolan (April 10, 2023). 2019:Ollstein, Alice Maranda (April 8, 2023). 1882: 1880: 1371: 1369: 1242: 1186:Staman, Jennifer A. (February 14, 2023). 895:, No. 22A902 (U.S. filed April 14, 2023). 534:'s prohibition on interstate shipment of 421:Christian Medical and Dental Associations 368:Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies 2314: 2312: 2212: 2210: 972:Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA 826:Judicial Conference of the United States 38:FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine 18:Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA 2181: 2179: 2177: 2175: 963: 961: 921: 837: 468:Department of Health and Human Services 460:Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 2806:Political history of the United States 2688:American Journal of Law & Medicine 2188:"Ruling echoes anti-abortion rhetoric" 1592:Weixel, Nathanial (February 6, 2024). 803:may cause more visits to the doctor." 494:Texas District Court opinion and order 2831:Alliance Defending Freedom litigation 2816:United States administrative case law 2243:Kitchener, Caroline (April 8, 2023). 1441:Pierson, Brendan (January 17, 2023). 1397:Kimball, Spencer (January 24, 2023). 1214:Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 446:The original defendants are the FDA, 32:2024 United States Supreme Court case 7: 2347:Bartlett, Jessica (April 11, 2023). 2081:Millhiser, Ian (December 17, 2022). 1941:Kimball, Spencer (August 16, 2023). 1546:Adler, Jonathan H. (April 8, 2023). 1525:Stern, Mark Joseph (April 7, 2023). 1266:Luthra, Shefali (February 7, 2023). 861:, No. 2:22-cv-00223, ECF No. 1, at 1 454:, Principal Deputy Commissioner Dr. 364:Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 286:Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 2680:https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad005 2585:Hurley, Lawrence (March 12, 2024). 2441:Gonzalez, Oriana (April 13, 2023). 2319:de Vogue, Ariane (April 12, 2023). 2121:Fattal, Isabel (February 8, 2023). 1967:Chung, Andrew (September 8, 2023). 1794:Kimball, Spencer (April 21, 2023). 1711:Kimball, Spencer (April 14, 2023). 1376:Atkins, Chloe (February 10, 2023). 1336:Smith, Jordan (February 28, 2023). 1309:"Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine" 586:Supreme Court emergency stay ruling 559:Fifth Circuit emergency stay ruling 346:. Mifepristone was approved by the 2730:Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2676:Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2514:Hurley, Lawrence (June 13, 2024). 1504:Nowell, Cecilia (March 15, 2023). 1462:Perez, Andrew (February 6, 2023). 1418:Belluck, Pam (February 24, 2023). 739:American Psychological Association 366:was amended to require the use of 320:Supreme Court of the United States 52:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 2611:Millhiser, Ian (March 12, 2024). 2553:Totenberg, Nina (June 13, 2024). 2460:Snead, Tierney (April 19, 2023). 1763:Quinn, Melissa (April 19, 2022). 1313:Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine 1167:Shutt, Jennifer (March 1, 2023). 552:Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America 417:American College of Pediatricians 2486:Sherman, Mark (March 26, 2024). 2380:Sneed, Tierney (April 8, 2023). 2102:Quinn, Melissa (March 2, 2023). 1827:Sherman, Mark (April 22, 2023). 1118:Choi, Annette (March 25, 2024). 1073:McCammon, Sarah (May 27, 2020). 522:. Kacsmaryk then ruled that the 45: 2811:United States abortion case law 1737:Dwyer, Devin (April 15, 2023). 1662:Belluck, Pam (April 13, 2023). 1092:Belluck, Pam (April 13, 2021). 983:New England Journal of Medicine 2826:2024 in United States case law 2821:2023 in United States case law 2399:Belluck, Pam (April 7, 2023). 1483:Cole, Devan (March 13, 2023). 1193:Congressional Research Service 448:Commissioner of Food and Drugs 352:abortions in the United States 1: 2186:Reed, Tina (April 10, 2023). 658:Democratic National Committee 615:' (emergency rulings with no 2796:Food and Drug Administration 524:Administrative Procedure Act 348:Food and Drug Administration 280:, a drug frequently used in 274:Food and Drug Administration 71:Food and Drug Administration 863:(N.D. Texas April 7, 2023). 642:United States Supreme Court 477:. Later on in the lawsuit, 383:United States Supreme Court 2847: 1060:KFF: Women's Health Policy 955:. FDA. September 28, 2000. 878:(5th Cir. April 10, 2023). 876:, No. 23-10362, ECF No. 20 727:Charlotte Lozier Institute 664:. Some, including Senator 498:The case was filed in the 428:Alliance Defending Freedom 904:The state parties in the 668:(D–OR) and Congresswoman 175: 165: 145: 44: 670:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 294:in 2022, which reversed 700:anti-abortion movements 520:organizational standing 1227:10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1 735:abortionchangesyou.com 528:statute of limitations 511:preliminary injunction 1553:The Volokh Conspiracy 1430:on February 25, 2023. 1350:on February 28, 2023. 711:"chemical abortion." 634:Jennifer Walker Elrod 624:Fifth Circuit hearing 250:Kavanaugh, joined by 234:Ketanji Brown Jackson 61:Decided June 13, 2024 59:Argued March 26, 2024 2135:on February 9, 2023. 996:10.1056/NEJMp2301813 504:Matthew J. Kacsmaryk 305:Matthew J. Kacsmaryk 276:(FDA)'s approval of 2742:10.1093/jlb/lsac037 2701:10.1017/amj.2022.29 2642:Stanford Law Review 2290:The Washington Post 2250:The Washington Post 2068:The Washington Post 1921:The Washington Post 1859:The Washington Post 722:The Washington Post 502:and heard by Judge 436:Gestational Age Act 141:Questions presented 2655:Cornell Law Review 2428:The New York Times 2405:The New York Times 2002:The New York Times 1674:on April 13, 2023. 1668:The New York Times 1632:on April 12, 2023. 1626:The New York Times 1424:The New York Times 1173:Wisconsin Examiner 1104:on April 14, 2021. 1098:The New York Times 935:The New York Times 609:dissenting opinion 576:Kurt D. Engelhardt 479:Danco Laboratories 464:Patrizia Cavazzoni 458:, Director of the 391:, which overruled 381:In June 2022, the 186:Associate Justices 2411:on April 7, 2023. 2361:on April 11, 2023 2297:on April 13, 2023 2008:on April 8, 2023. 1865:on April 22, 2023 942:on March 2, 2023. 376:COVID-19 pandemic 265: 264: 226:Amy Coney Barrett 16:(Redirected from 2838: 2763: 2753: 2720: 2695:(2–3): 244–255. 2671: 2628: 2627: 2625: 2623: 2608: 2602: 2601: 2599: 2597: 2582: 2576: 2571: 2565: 2564: 2550: 2544: 2539: 2533: 2532: 2530: 2528: 2511: 2505: 2504: 2502: 2500: 2483: 2477: 2476: 2474: 2472: 2457: 2451: 2450: 2438: 2432: 2431: 2419: 2413: 2412: 2407:. Archived from 2396: 2390: 2389: 2377: 2371: 2370: 2368: 2366: 2357:. Archived from 2354:The Boston Globe 2344: 2338: 2337: 2335: 2333: 2316: 2307: 2306: 2304: 2302: 2293:. Archived from 2280: 2267: 2266: 2264: 2262: 2257:on April 8, 2023 2253:. Archived from 2240: 2234: 2233: 2231: 2229: 2214: 2205: 2204: 2202: 2200: 2183: 2170: 2169: 2167: 2165: 2150: 2137: 2136: 2131:. Archived from 2118: 2112: 2111: 2099: 2093: 2092: 2078: 2072: 2071: 2059: 2050: 2049: 2037: 2031: 2030: 2016: 2010: 2009: 2004:. Archived from 1993: 1984: 1983: 1981: 1979: 1964: 1958: 1957: 1955: 1953: 1938: 1932: 1931: 1929: 1927: 1912: 1906: 1905: 1903: 1901: 1884: 1875: 1874: 1872: 1870: 1861:. Archived from 1850: 1844: 1843: 1841: 1839: 1833:Associated Press 1824: 1811: 1810: 1808: 1806: 1791: 1782: 1781: 1779: 1777: 1760: 1754: 1753: 1751: 1749: 1734: 1728: 1727: 1725: 1723: 1708: 1702: 1701: 1699: 1697: 1691:Associated Press 1682: 1676: 1675: 1670:. Archived from 1659: 1653: 1652: 1640: 1634: 1633: 1628:. Archived from 1617: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1606: 1589: 1583: 1582: 1578:Associated Press 1568: 1562: 1561: 1543: 1537: 1536: 1522: 1516: 1515: 1501: 1495: 1494: 1480: 1474: 1473: 1459: 1453: 1452: 1438: 1432: 1431: 1426:. Archived from 1415: 1409: 1408: 1394: 1388: 1387: 1373: 1364: 1358: 1352: 1351: 1346:. Archived from 1333: 1324: 1323: 1321: 1319: 1305: 1299: 1298: 1284: 1278: 1277: 1263: 1257: 1256: 1246: 1204: 1198: 1197: 1183: 1177: 1176: 1164: 1158: 1157: 1143: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1132: 1115: 1106: 1105: 1100:. Archived from 1089: 1083: 1082: 1070: 1064: 1063: 1051: 1045: 1044: 1030: 1024: 1023: 965: 956: 950: 944: 943: 938:. Archived from 926: 909: 902: 896: 885: 879: 870: 864: 855: 849: 848:, Docket 23-236. 842: 748:uterine bleeding 682:Cindy Hyde-Smith 572:Catharina Haynes 434:, Mississippi's 282:medical abortion 171:Court membership 49: 48: 35: 21: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2786: 2785: 2723: 2684: 2651: 2637: 2635:Further reading 2632: 2631: 2621: 2619: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2595: 2593: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2572: 2568: 2552: 2551: 2547: 2540: 2536: 2526: 2524: 2513: 2512: 2508: 2498: 2496: 2485: 2484: 2480: 2470: 2468: 2459: 2458: 2454: 2440: 2439: 2435: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2398: 2397: 2393: 2379: 2378: 2374: 2364: 2362: 2346: 2345: 2341: 2331: 2329: 2318: 2317: 2310: 2300: 2298: 2282: 2281: 2270: 2260: 2258: 2242: 2241: 2237: 2227: 2225: 2216: 2215: 2208: 2198: 2196: 2185: 2184: 2173: 2163: 2161: 2160:. April 8, 2023 2152: 2151: 2140: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2061: 2060: 2053: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2018: 2017: 2013: 1995: 1994: 1987: 1977: 1975: 1966: 1965: 1961: 1951: 1949: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1925: 1923: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1899: 1897: 1886: 1885: 1878: 1868: 1866: 1852: 1851: 1847: 1837: 1835: 1826: 1825: 1814: 1804: 1802: 1793: 1792: 1785: 1775: 1773: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1747: 1745: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1721: 1719: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1695: 1693: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1604: 1602: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1524: 1523: 1519: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1417: 1416: 1412: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1375: 1374: 1367: 1359: 1355: 1335: 1334: 1327: 1317: 1315: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1166: 1165: 1161: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1130: 1128: 1117: 1116: 1109: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1032: 1031: 1027: 967: 966: 959: 951: 947: 928: 927: 923: 918: 913: 912: 903: 899: 886: 882: 871: 867: 856: 852: 843: 839: 834: 818: 789: 780: 771:generic version 756: 654:Hakeem Jeffries 650: 626: 605:Clarence Thomas 588: 561: 543:Sage Publishing 496: 491: 444: 413:Amarillo, Texas 408: 403: 336: 303:District Judge 224: 222:Brett Kavanaugh 212: 202:Sonia Sotomayor 200: 190:Clarence Thomas 85: 60: 54: 39: 33: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2844: 2842: 2834: 2833: 2828: 2823: 2818: 2813: 2808: 2803: 2798: 2788: 2787: 2784: 2783: 2764: 2736:(2). lsac037. 2721: 2682: 2672: 2662:(3): 627–704. 2649: 2636: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2603: 2577: 2566: 2545: 2534: 2506: 2478: 2452: 2433: 2414: 2391: 2372: 2339: 2308: 2268: 2235: 2206: 2171: 2138: 2113: 2094: 2073: 2051: 2032: 2011: 1985: 1959: 1933: 1907: 1876: 1845: 1812: 1783: 1755: 1729: 1703: 1677: 1654: 1635: 1612: 1584: 1563: 1538: 1517: 1496: 1475: 1454: 1433: 1410: 1389: 1365: 1353: 1325: 1300: 1279: 1258: 1199: 1178: 1159: 1138: 1107: 1084: 1065: 1046: 1025: 957: 945: 920: 919: 917: 914: 911: 910: 897: 880: 865: 850: 836: 835: 833: 830: 822:judge shopping 817: 814: 788: 785: 779: 776: 760:Thomas O. Rice 755: 752: 693:forum shopping 662:Jaime Harrison 649: 646: 638:Cory T. Wilson 625: 622: 587: 584: 560: 557: 536:abortifacients 495: 492: 490: 487: 475:Xavier Becerra 456:Janet Woodcock 443: 440: 407: 404: 402: 399: 335: 332: 263: 262: 259: 255: 254: 248: 244: 243: 239: 238: 237: 236: 187: 184: 179: 173: 172: 168: 167: 163: 162: 158: 157: 156: 155: 152: 149: 143: 142: 138: 137: 127: 123: 122: 118: 117: 112: 108: 107: 94: 90: 89: 80: 76: 75: 67: 66:Full case name 63: 62: 56: 55: 50: 42: 41: 31: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2843: 2832: 2829: 2827: 2824: 2822: 2819: 2817: 2814: 2812: 2809: 2807: 2804: 2802: 2799: 2797: 2794: 2793: 2791: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2752: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2689: 2683: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2656: 2650: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2634: 2618: 2614: 2607: 2604: 2592: 2588: 2581: 2578: 2575: 2570: 2567: 2562: 2561: 2556: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2538: 2535: 2523: 2522: 2517: 2510: 2507: 2495: 2494: 2489: 2482: 2479: 2467: 2463: 2456: 2453: 2448: 2444: 2437: 2434: 2429: 2425: 2418: 2415: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2395: 2392: 2387: 2383: 2376: 2373: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2350: 2343: 2340: 2328: 2327: 2322: 2315: 2313: 2309: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2286: 2279: 2277: 2275: 2273: 2269: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2246: 2239: 2236: 2224: 2220: 2213: 2211: 2207: 2195: 2194: 2189: 2182: 2180: 2178: 2176: 2172: 2159: 2155: 2149: 2147: 2145: 2143: 2139: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2117: 2114: 2109: 2105: 2098: 2095: 2090: 2089: 2084: 2077: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2058: 2056: 2052: 2047: 2043: 2036: 2033: 2028: 2027: 2022: 2015: 2012: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1992: 1990: 1986: 1978:September 10, 1974: 1970: 1963: 1960: 1948: 1944: 1937: 1934: 1922: 1918: 1911: 1908: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1883: 1881: 1877: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1849: 1846: 1834: 1830: 1823: 1821: 1819: 1817: 1813: 1801: 1797: 1790: 1788: 1784: 1772: 1771: 1766: 1759: 1756: 1744: 1740: 1733: 1730: 1718: 1714: 1707: 1704: 1692: 1688: 1681: 1678: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1658: 1655: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1636: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1616: 1613: 1601: 1600: 1595: 1588: 1585: 1580: 1579: 1574: 1567: 1564: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1549: 1542: 1539: 1534: 1533: 1528: 1521: 1518: 1513: 1512: 1507: 1500: 1497: 1492: 1491: 1486: 1479: 1476: 1471: 1470: 1465: 1458: 1455: 1450: 1449: 1444: 1437: 1434: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1414: 1411: 1406: 1405: 1400: 1393: 1390: 1385: 1384: 1379: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1354: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1343:The Intercept 1339: 1332: 1330: 1326: 1314: 1310: 1304: 1301: 1296: 1295: 1290: 1283: 1280: 1275: 1274: 1269: 1262: 1259: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1215: 1210: 1203: 1200: 1195: 1194: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1174: 1170: 1163: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1153:Bloomberg Law 1149: 1142: 1139: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1114: 1112: 1108: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1088: 1085: 1080: 1076: 1069: 1066: 1061: 1057: 1050: 1047: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1029: 1026: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 979: 977: 973: 964: 962: 958: 954: 949: 946: 941: 937: 936: 932: 925: 922: 915: 907: 901: 898: 894: 890: 884: 881: 877: 875: 869: 866: 862: 860: 854: 851: 847: 841: 838: 831: 829: 827: 823: 815: 813: 811: 810: 804: 802: 796: 794: 786: 784: 778:Supreme Court 777: 775: 772: 767: 764: 761: 754:Related cases 753: 751: 749: 743: 740: 736: 730: 728: 724: 723: 718: 717: 712: 709: 705: 701: 696: 694: 690: 685: 683: 679: 675: 674:Chuck Schumer 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 647: 645: 643: 639: 635: 631: 623: 621: 618: 617:oral argument 614: 613:shadow docket 610: 606: 602: 596: 593: 585: 583: 581: 580:Andrew Oldham 577: 573: 568: 566: 558: 556: 553: 548: 544: 539: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 516: 512: 507: 505: 501: 493: 488: 486: 485:in the case. 484: 480: 476: 473: 472:HHS Secretary 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 452:Robert Califf 449: 441: 439: 437: 433: 429: 424: 422: 418: 414: 405: 400: 398: 396: 395: 390: 389: 384: 379: 377: 371: 369: 365: 361: 355: 353: 349: 345: 341: 333: 331: 329: 325: 321: 316: 314: 313:another order 310: 309:Fifth Circuit 306: 301: 299: 298: 293: 292: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 270: 260: 256: 253: 249: 245: 242:Case opinions 240: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 188: 185: 183: 180: 178:Chief Justice 177: 176: 174: 169: 164: 159: 153: 150: 147: 146: 144: 139: 135: 131: 128: 124: 119: 116: 115:Oral argument 113: 109: 105: 104: 99: 95: 91: 88: 84: 81: 77: 74: 72: 68: 64: 57: 53: 43: 36: 30: 19: 2767: 2733: 2729: 2692: 2686: 2675: 2659: 2653: 2646:SSRN 4335735 2620:. Retrieved 2616: 2606: 2594:. Retrieved 2590: 2580: 2569: 2558: 2548: 2537: 2525:. Retrieved 2519: 2509: 2497:. Retrieved 2491: 2481: 2469:. Retrieved 2465: 2455: 2446: 2436: 2427: 2417: 2409:the original 2404: 2394: 2385: 2375: 2363:. Retrieved 2359:the original 2352: 2342: 2330:. Retrieved 2324: 2299:. Retrieved 2295:the original 2288: 2259:. Retrieved 2255:the original 2248: 2238: 2226:. Retrieved 2222: 2197:. Retrieved 2191: 2162:. Retrieved 2158:The Guardian 2157: 2133:the original 2128:The Atlantic 2126: 2116: 2107: 2097: 2086: 2076: 2067: 2045: 2035: 2024: 2014: 2006:the original 2001: 1976:. Retrieved 1962: 1950:. Retrieved 1946: 1936: 1924:. Retrieved 1920: 1910: 1898:. Retrieved 1892: 1867:. Retrieved 1863:the original 1858: 1848: 1836:. Retrieved 1832: 1803:. Retrieved 1799: 1774:. Retrieved 1768: 1758: 1746:. Retrieved 1742: 1732: 1720:. Retrieved 1716: 1706: 1694:. Retrieved 1690: 1680: 1672:the original 1667: 1657: 1648: 1638: 1630:the original 1625: 1615: 1603:. Retrieved 1597: 1587: 1576: 1566: 1551: 1541: 1530: 1520: 1511:The Guardian 1509: 1499: 1488: 1478: 1467: 1457: 1446: 1436: 1428:the original 1423: 1413: 1402: 1392: 1381: 1356: 1348:the original 1341: 1316:. Retrieved 1312: 1303: 1292: 1282: 1271: 1261: 1221:(10): 1–27. 1218: 1212: 1202: 1191: 1181: 1172: 1162: 1151: 1141: 1129:. Retrieved 1123: 1102:the original 1097: 1087: 1078: 1068: 1059: 1049: 1038: 1028: 987: 981: 975: 971: 948: 940:the original 933: 924: 905: 900: 892: 888: 883: 873: 868: 858: 853: 845: 840: 819: 807: 805: 800: 797: 790: 781: 768: 765: 757: 744: 734: 731: 720: 714: 713: 707: 697: 689:Donald Trump 686: 678:Patty Murray 651: 627: 597: 592:Samuel Alito 589: 569: 562: 546: 540: 532:Comstock Act 526:'s six-year 508: 497: 445: 431: 425: 409: 392: 386: 380: 372: 356: 340:mifepristone 337: 317: 302: 295: 289: 278:mifepristone 268: 267: 266: 251: 229: 217: 214:Neil Gorsuch 205: 198:Samuel Alito 193: 182:John Roberts 129: 121:Case history 101: 69: 29: 1605:February 6, 990:(10): e29. 793:Article III 676:(D–NY) and 656:(D–NY) and 630:James C. Ho 394:Roe v. Wade 344:misoprostol 328:Article III 297:Roe v. Wade 258:Concurrence 210:Elena Kagan 132:, 78 F.4th 79:Docket nos. 2790:Categories 1952:August 17, 916:References 906:Washington 483:intervened 442:Defendants 406:Plaintiffs 334:Background 2717:256359216 2499:March 27, 2471:April 21, 2365:April 22, 2332:April 22, 2301:April 22, 2261:April 22, 2228:April 22, 2199:April 22, 2164:April 22, 1900:April 22, 1869:April 22, 1838:April 22, 1805:April 22, 1776:April 22, 1748:April 22, 1722:April 22, 1696:April 13, 1235:1546-0738 1131:March 27, 1020:257099568 1004:0028-4793 666:Ron Wyden 648:Reactions 252:unanimous 93:Citations 2776:part III 2768:Substack 2760:36568649 2709:36715252 2622:April 7, 2596:April 7, 2591:NBC News 2527:June 13, 2521:NBC News 2223:NBC News 2108:CBS News 2026:Politico 1894:The Hill 1770:CBS News 1743:ABC News 1649:ABC News 1599:The Hill 1383:NBC News 1318:March 3, 1294:ABC News 1273:The 19th 1253:36417304 1012:36812454 787:Decision 545:journal 515:standing 385:decided 324:standing 247:Majority 111:Argument 2780:part IV 2772:part II 2751:9774452 2678:10(1) 2668:3795414 2493:AP News 1973:Reuters 1926:May 22, 1469:Jacobin 1448:Reuters 1244:9707346 489:Rulings 401:Lawsuit 161:Holding 2758:  2748:  2715:  2707:  2666:  2046:Reason 1557:Reason 1251:  1241:  1233:  1018:  1010:  1002:  976:Dobbs' 816:Impact 801:others 660:Chair 636:, and 601:merits 578:, and 470:, and 466:, the 419:, and 362:, the 326:under 261:Thomas 232: 230:· 228:  220: 218:· 216:  208: 206:· 204:  196: 194:· 192:  87:23-236 83:23-235 2713:S2CID 2447:Axios 2193:Axios 1532:Slate 1016:S2CID 832:Notes 716:Axios 704:fetus 432:Dobbs 126:Prior 100:367 ( 2778:and 2756:PMID 2705:PMID 2664:SSRN 2624:2024 2598:2024 2529:2024 2501:2024 2473:2023 2367:2023 2334:2023 2303:2023 2263:2023 2230:2023 2201:2023 2166:2023 1980:2023 1954:2023 1947:CNBC 1928:2023 1902:2023 1871:2023 1840:2023 1807:2023 1800:CNBC 1778:2023 1750:2023 1724:2022 1717:CNBC 1698:2023 1607:2024 1404:CNBC 1320:2023 1249:PMID 1231:ISSN 1133:2024 1008:PMID 1000:ISSN 462:Dr. 450:Dr. 342:and 318:The 103:more 98:U.S. 96:602 2746:PMC 2738:doi 2697:doi 2660:107 2617:Vox 2560:NPR 2466:CNN 2386:CNN 2326:CNN 2088:Vox 1555:at 1490:CNN 1239:PMC 1223:doi 1125:CNN 1079:NPR 1040:NPR 992:doi 988:388 134:210 2792:: 2782:). 2754:. 2744:. 2732:. 2728:. 2711:. 2703:. 2693:48 2691:. 2658:. 2615:. 2589:. 2557:. 2518:. 2490:. 2464:. 2445:. 2426:. 2403:. 2384:. 2351:. 2323:. 2311:^ 2287:. 2271:^ 2247:. 2221:. 2209:^ 2190:. 2174:^ 2156:. 2141:^ 2125:. 2106:. 2085:. 2066:. 2054:^ 2044:. 2023:. 2000:. 1988:^ 1971:. 1945:. 1919:. 1891:. 1879:^ 1857:. 1831:. 1815:^ 1798:. 1786:^ 1767:. 1741:. 1715:. 1689:. 1666:. 1647:. 1624:. 1596:. 1575:. 1550:. 1529:. 1508:. 1487:. 1466:. 1445:. 1422:. 1401:. 1380:. 1368:^ 1340:. 1328:^ 1311:. 1291:. 1270:. 1247:. 1237:. 1229:. 1219:71 1217:. 1211:. 1190:. 1171:. 1150:. 1122:. 1110:^ 1096:. 1077:. 1058:. 1037:. 1014:. 1006:. 998:. 986:. 980:. 974:— 960:^ 750:. 708:un 644:. 632:, 574:, 438:. 354:. 2762:. 2740:: 2734:9 2719:. 2699:: 2670:. 2648:. 2626:. 2600:. 2563:. 2531:. 2503:. 2475:. 2449:. 2430:. 2388:. 2369:. 2336:. 2305:. 2265:. 2232:. 2203:. 2168:. 2110:. 2091:. 2070:. 2048:. 2029:. 1982:. 1956:. 1930:. 1904:. 1873:. 1842:. 1809:. 1780:. 1752:. 1726:. 1700:. 1651:. 1609:. 1581:. 1560:. 1535:. 1514:. 1493:. 1472:. 1451:. 1407:. 1386:. 1322:. 1297:. 1276:. 1255:. 1225:: 1196:. 1175:. 1156:. 1135:. 1081:. 1062:. 1043:. 1022:. 994:: 970:" 136:. 106:) 20:)

Index

Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
Supreme Court of the United States
Food and Drug Administration
23-235
23-236
U.S.
more
Oral argument
210
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Food and Drug Administration
mifepristone
medical abortion
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Roe v. Wade
Matthew J. Kacsmaryk
Fifth Circuit
another order
Supreme Court of the United States
standing
Article III

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑