Knowledge (XXG)

Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda

Source ๐Ÿ“

426:
discrimination." In the February ruling, whether sexual orientation discrimination occurred in the case had not been addressed, only the legality of such discrimination. The petition also did not seek to address the merits of the Zarda case specifically, only focusing on whether Title VII applied as a valid type of discrimination. Altitude Express was represented by Saul Zabell of Zabell & Associates. In the petition, Zabell argued that the decision made by the 7th and 2nd Circuits "departed from more than 50 years of established precedent" in that it ruled on the scope of protection for LGBT employees under Title VII. To "resolve the circuit split," the petition called for the Supreme Court to step in. There was no guarantee the court would grant the petition. Donald Zarda's estate, represented by lawyer Gregory Antollino, opposed the Supreme Court review, with Antollino stating that he thought more "circuits need to weigh in" before the Supreme Court involvement and citing other pending cases. It was noted that between the different circuits, the courts were split on the matter of sexual orientation discrimination.
565:. In his dissent, Alito asserted that at the time of the crafting of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 the concepts of sexual orientation and transgender identity would have been unknown, and thus Congress's language should not be implied to cover these facets. Alito wrote, "Many will applaud today's decision because they agree on policy grounds with the Court's updating of Title VII. But the question in these cases is not whether discrimination because of sexual orientation or gender identity should be outlawed. The question is whether Congress did that in 1964. It indisputably did not." Alito further stated that "even if discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity could be squeezed into some arcane understanding of sex discrimination, the context in which Title VII was enacted would tell us that this is not what the statute's terms were understood to mean at that time." Alito was critical of the majority decision: 355:, including instructing the DOJ to reverse its decision on Title VII protections for sexual orientation. In its new memo, the DOJ asserted that while significant cultural shifts had occurred since the passage of the Civil Rights Act, Congress had not amended the law in any way, and thus rejected that Title VII protected against sexual orientation discrimination as the DOJ had "substantial and unique interest" to follow the letter of the law. No such change was made from the EEOC's stance, putting these two agencies at odds with each other. The three-judge panel at the Second Circuit affirmed the District Court's ruling in April 2017, agreeing that sexual orientation was not covered by Title VII, but commented in the opinion that there were "tensions" around how such cases were being handled by the courts. 388:
sexual orientation is a function of sex and sex is a protected characteristic under Title VII, it follows that sexual orientation is also protected." The ruling did not focus on the merits of Zarda's case specifically, but whether sexual orientation was protected as a function of sex, and in effect protected gay workers under the Civil Rights Act. In effect, the conclusion held that Zarda's estate could bring Title VII claims against Altitude Express, as the law encompassed discrimination based on sexual orientation. In the ruling, the 2nd Circuit confirmed that its conclusion was the result and continuation of the Supreme Court's 1989 prohibition on gender stereotyping in
486: 31: 2598: 516:. The Court further held that Title VII protections against sex discrimination in the employment context apply to discrimination against particular individuals on the basis of sex, as opposed to discrimination against groups. Thus, Title VII provides a remedy to individuals who experience discrimination on the basis of sex even if an employer's policy on the whole does not involve discrimination. Gorsuch wrote: 2586: 586:
Millions of gay and lesbian Americans have worked hard for many decades to achieve equal treatment in fact and law ... They have advanced powerful policy arguments and can take pride in today's result. Under the Constitution's separation of powers, however, I believe that it was Congress's role,
520:
An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex. Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids. Those who adopted the Civil Rights
368:
that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not explicitly cover sexual-orientation discrimination in the workplace. Both the DOJ and the EEOC filed opposing amicus briefs. The DOJ explained its position to the Second Circuit. The brief argued that the law does not define "sex," and that
298:
In 2010, Donald Zarda was fired from his skydiving job at Altitude Express. He had told a customer he was gay to make her more comfortable with being strapped together. The woman's boyfriend later complained to the company that Zarda had inappropriately touched her, and Zarda was fired as a result.
254:
The case involved Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor for Altitude Express who had told a female customer of his gay identity to make her more comfortable being attached to him during a skydive. She and her boyfriend later expressed their objections to Altitude, leading to Zarda's dismissal on the
548:
Gorsuch's decision also alluded to concerns that the judgment may set a sweeping precedent that would force gender equality on traditional practices. "They say sex-segregated bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes will prove unsustainable after our decision today but none of these other laws are
471:
were heard during October 8, 2019 oral arguments. In oral arguments the Court's more conservative Justices argued that because Congress had not included sexual orientation at the time of the Civil Rights Act, nor had updated the law to include it since, they feared creating law outside Congress's
412:
ruling from the Second Circuit, it had been expected for the case to be on track for the Supreme Court. Zarda's legal representative Gregory Antollino argued that, "If you discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, you necessarily take into account the sex of the employee. You can't take the
387:
After the oral argument was made on September 26, 2017, the opinion was issued on February 26, 2018. The full court reversed the prior rulings on a 10โ€“3 vote, and asserted that Title VII prohibits sexual orientation employment discrimination under the category of sex. The court ruled that "because
311:
and the firing was due to Zarda's sexual orientation. In the case, Altitude argued that Zarda had touched the client inappropriately, backing up the customer's claims. Zarda's family argued that he had no motive to do such a thing, which was consistent with his job and inconsistent with his sexual
569:
There is only one word for what the Court has done today: legislation. The document that the Court releases is in the form of a judicial opinion interpreting a statute, but that is deceptive ... A more brazen abuse of our authority to interpret statutes is hard to recall. The Court tries to
425:
that "expanding the law to cover discrimination based on sexual orientation should be done by legislators, not the judiciary." The petition argued that sexual orientation discrimination did "not amount to discrimination based on gender stereotyping, which some courts have ruled is a type of sex
373:
announced that it disagreed with the DOJ's stance, arguing to protect gay rights. The DOJ argued as well that employers were free "to regulate employees' off-the-job sexual behavior" and could discriminate for promiscuity, adultery, or sexual orientation. The EEOC reiterated arguments it had
537:, in which an employer required women to make larger pension fund contributions than did men, on the premise that women on average live longer than men do. Both cases violated Title VII, and Gorsuch wrote, "just as labels and additional intentions or motivations didn't make a difference in 2380: 1860: 521:
Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result. But the limits of the drafters' imagination supply no reason to ignore the law's demands. Only the written word is the law, and all persons are entitled to its benefit.
449: 282: 501:
delivered the opinion of the Court in this case on June 15, 2020. In a 6โ€“3 decision, the Court held that Title VII protections pursuant to ยง 2000e-2(a)(1) did extend to cover sexual orientation and gender identity. The decision then involved the
2434: 1951: 420:
reported that Altitude Express had appealed the February decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Altitude Express filed a petition for the Supreme Court to hear the case again, arguing, according to the
2624: 2353: 340:(DOJ) that it would also treat sexual orientation as protected under Title VII should such cases be presented to them. Despite these federal memos, the District Court summarily ruled in favor of Altitude Express. 280:, a similar case of sexual orientation discrimination from the Eleventh Circuit but which ruled that Title VII did not cover such discrimination. Oral arguments were heard on October 8, 2019, alongside the case 2385: 329: 2644: 1803: 597: 2518: 2478: 618: 1733: 1705: 579: 255:
claim of misconduct. Zarda filed suit in 2014 on the basis of employment discrimination, and though Zarda died in a parachuting accident that year, his family continued the legal battle.
2569: 2259: 2246: 1848: 1130: 440: 375: 1265: 525:
In his opinion, Gorsuch wrote, "it is irrelevant what an employer might call its discriminatory practice, how others might label it, or what else might motivate it." He referenced
2333: 1507: 1485: 344: 263: 238: 123: 79: 444: 533: 2483: 2453: 2375: 2358: 312:
orientation, the real motive for his firing. Zarda alleged he was fired for failing to conform to the "straight male macho stereotype". Zarda died on October 3, 2014, in
962: 2392: 2368: 2299: 2269: 1104: 1334: 2397: 1726: 1808: 447:
allowed for dismissal of employees due to sexual orientation. The Court's granting of cert was announced alongside another related case to be heard by the court
2523: 2363: 1446: 336:(EEOC) issued a non-binding memo in 2015 that it would treat sexual orientation as covered by Title VII; this aligned with a prior non-binding memo from the 2629: 2343: 2289: 2639: 2409: 1576: 622: 2602: 2429: 1719: 1065: 248: 1599: 2654: 2402: 472:
authority. Arguments also centered on how the word "sex" in Title VII could be interpreted to include sexual orientation, and not strictly gender.
2649: 2448: 2236: 1927: 1917: 333: 1688: 549:
before us; we have not had the benefit of adversarial testing about the meaning of their terms, and we do not prejudge any such question today."
439:(Docket #17-1618), in which a gay employee in the county's child welfare service program was fired for his sexual orientation. In this case, the 1150: 2441: 2323: 1872: 1417: 1022: 2559: 790: 396: 2424: 2419: 2348: 2338: 2328: 671: 364:
hearing before the full Second District court, which was granted. In July 2017, the DOJ unexpectedly interceded in the case, arguing in a
299:
In October 2010, the press first reported that Zarda had brought his firing to court and was suing Altitude Express. Altitude Express (in
2508: 2018: 848: 307:) claimed Zarda had been fired for alleged "inappropriate behavior in the workplace", with Zarda's lawyer arguing the customer had been 1239: 270:, and then ruled in a 10-3 decision that Title VII does protect employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation, adding to a 2564: 2513: 2203: 1077: 935: 241: 35: 1742: 993: 527: 2488: 2254: 727: 507: 337: 1044: 1389: 1360: 578:
wrote a separate dissent, arguing that the Court could not add sexual orientation or gender identity to Title VII due to the
691: 122:
An employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
2634: 2539: 2279: 2168: 2133: 485: 1630: 2208: 2113: 2073: 732: 758: 2173: 2163: 2158: 2138: 1291: 390: 1940: 1656: 885: 286:
which dealt with Title VII and employment protections for transgender people. The Court ruled in a 6โ€“3 decision for
2294: 2088: 2003: 1890: 1813: 1528: 290:, covering all three cases, on June 15, 2020, that Title VII protections do apply to gay and transgender persons. 2123: 2118: 1993: 1856: 1556: 435: 365: 276: 97: 2213: 2178: 2083: 2058: 1884: 1819: 1173: 503: 370: 820: 351:
became president in 2017. Trump took steps to undo many actions previously established by the prior president
2198: 2148: 2128: 2103: 2093: 2078: 2068: 2053: 2033: 2008: 1998: 1988: 1946: 1912: 1757: 940: 63: 2414: 2218: 2193: 2098: 2038: 2013: 1983: 1973: 1305: 1195: 2554: 2153: 2108: 2048: 2023: 1978: 1922: 1879: 1826: 1790: 1777: 1511: 1489: 74: 2183: 2063: 2028: 1832: 1604: 1502: 512: 251:
employees could not be discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.
2284: 2188: 2143: 2043: 1770: 157: 1361:"Supreme Court to Decide Whether Landmark Civil Rights Law Applies to Gay and Transgender Workers" 54:
Altitude Express, Inc., et al. v. Melissa Zarda, as Executor of the Estate of Donald Zarda, et al.
1933: 1533: 1394: 1365: 1082: 998: 890: 380: 570:
convince readers that it is merely enforcing the terms of the statute, but that is preposterous.
1562: 2549: 1796: 1098: 798: 274:. The Supreme Court accepted Altitude Express's petition and consolidated the case alongside 2228: 304: 1481: 575: 562: 193: 173: 149: 2544: 1840: 1783: 1514: 763: 161: 1689:
EXCLUSIVE: Anger, leaks and tensions at the Supreme Court during the LGBTQ rights case
1078:"Discrimination Based on Sex Is Debated in Case of Gay Sky Diver - The New York Times" 2618: 2460: 1697: 1131:"Two new petitions call on SCOTUS to decide workplace protections for gays, lesbians" 271: 1711: 450:
R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
283:
R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
2590: 1222: 918: 619:"Supreme Court grants federal job protections to gay, lesbian, transgender workers" 558: 510:
as in other recent landmark cases involving the rights of LGBT individuals such as
498: 490: 352: 348: 317: 244: 185: 169: 141: 1700:
who details the decision-making process leading to the landmark court decision in
1292:"Federal Appeals Court Rules Sexual Orientation Discrimination Violates Title VII" 672:"Plaintiff at center of landmark gay-rights case never got to witness his victory" 429:
The Supreme Court granted cert to the petition in April 2019 under the case name
1447:"Supreme Court rules existing civil rights law protects gay and lesbian workers" 454: 313: 300: 181: 1266:"2nd Circuit demolishes key DOJ argument against workplace protection for gays" 1965: 582:, leaving this responsibility to Congress. He concluded by acknowledging that 308: 1390:"Supreme Court to Decide Whether Bias Law Covers Gay and Transgender Workers" 369:
the common "ordinary" usage protected being biologically female or male. The
1529:"Civil Rights Law Protects Gay and Transgender Workers, Supreme Court Rules" 768: 1631:"Supreme Court says federal law protects LGBTQ workers from discrimination" 1600:"Workers can't be fired for being gay or transgender, Supreme Court rules" 1418:"Supreme Court clashes over meaning of 'sex' in LGBT discrimination cases" 644: 1661: 1451: 1023:"Justice Department Argues for Antigay Discrimination in Skydiver's Case" 963:"U.S. Justice Department says anti-bias law does not protect gay workers" 676: 1174:"Zarda V Altitude Express: Trump Administration to Lose Gay Rights Case" 1708:
from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved on November 24, 2020.
1657:"Supreme Court finds federal law bars LGBT discrimination in workplace" 1226: 1135: 967: 360: 267: 759:"Albrechta: Federal courts split on sexual orientation discrimination" 849:"Years After His Tragic Death, This Gay Adventurer Is Making History" 531:, in which a company refused to hire women with young children; and 433:(Docket #17-1623). The case was consolidated with another petition, 1151:"Analysis: Politics Overshadows Substance in LGBTQ Employment Case" 484: 330:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
1421: 649: 443:
ruled in favor of the county, that previous case law out of the
105: 101: 1715: 1335:"Appellate rulings push transgender fight closer to high court" 506:
of Title VII (specifically the original meaning of "sex"), not
384:
case in 2017. A number of opinions were published on the case.
30: 1693: 1634: 1310: 1045:"US faces off with itself in gay skydiver discrimination case" 210:
Gorsuch, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
1804:
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act
936:"Government Lawyers Take Opposite Sides in a Gay Rights Case" 598:
List of LGBT-related cases in the United States Supreme Court
2519:
History of violence against LGBT people in the United States
2479:
U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions
1240:"Federal court ruling hailed 'huge victory' for gay workers" 994:"Civil Rights Act Protects Gay Workers, Appeals Court Rules" 2625:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit cases
728:"Supreme Court Has Another Chance to Rule on Antigay Bias" 886:"Justice Department Says Rights Law Doesn't Protect Gays" 400:
in 1998 that protected both genders from discrimination.
258:
The District Court ruled in favor of Altitude Express in
1849:
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
1076:
By JOSEPH GOLDSTEINSEPT. 26, 2017 (September 26, 2017).
266:. However, the Second Circuit agreed to rehear the case 2645:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
262:, and this ruling was affirmed by a 3-0 ruling of the 2570:
Disney and Florida's Parental Rights in Education Act
345:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
264:
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
453:, related to whether Title VII protections included 2532: 2501: 2484:
Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state
2469: 2312: 2268: 2245: 2227: 1964: 1901: 1756: 1749: 1577:"Supreme Court bans LGBT employment discrimination" 1440: 1438: 692:"NY Skydive Teacher Claims Being Gay Got Him Fired" 320:accident and the case was continued by his family. 222: 214: 206: 201: 130: 116: 92: 87: 69: 59: 49: 42: 23: 534:City of L.A. Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart 1655:Gerstein, Josh; Rainey, Rebecca (June 15, 2020). 1575:Dwyer, Devin; Svokos, Alexandra (June 15, 2020). 1696:'s legal analyst & Supreme Court biographer 1306:"LGBT employment cases on road to Supreme Court" 374:"pioneered" in a case in 2015 that informed the 1629:de Vogue, Ariana; Cole, Devan (June 15, 2020). 1624: 1622: 584: 567: 518: 2524:2020s anti-LGBT movement in the United States 1727: 332:in 2014. While the case was in progress, the 8: 2386:State bans on local anti-discrimination laws 1103:: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list ( 880: 878: 876: 874: 872: 870: 2316: 1952:Presidential Memorandum of August 25, 2017 1762: 1753: 1734: 1720: 1712: 20: 929: 927: 843: 841: 249:Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 2403:Florida Parental Rights in Education Act 1809:Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 1124: 1122: 1120: 1118: 1116: 1114: 721: 719: 717: 715: 713: 1928:Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 1918:Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 609: 545:, they cannot make a difference here." 334:Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 124:Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 100:(E.D.N.Y. Mar 28, 2014); affirmed, 855 1873:G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board 1473: 1471: 1469: 1096: 988: 986: 821:"#22: Does Your Boss Know You're Gay?" 2560:Arnold Schwarzenegger and LGBT rights 752: 750: 587:not this Court's, to amend Title VII. 397:Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services 18:2020 United States Supreme Court case 7: 328:Zarda's case was initially heard in 2509:LGBT movements in the United States 1416:Higgens, Tucker (October 8, 2019). 1172:Koppelman, Andrew (July 29, 2017). 561:wrote a dissent, joined by Justice 413:'sex' out of "sexual orientation." 2630:United States LGBT rights case law 2565:LGBT protests against Donald Trump 2514:LGBTQ history in the United States 1692:. A background article written by 1021:Ring, Trudy (September 27, 2017). 934:Nicole Hong (September 26, 2017). 797:. October 31, 2014. Archived from 757:David Albrechta (March 10, 2018). 493:delivered the opinion of the Court 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 2640:United States Supreme Court cases 1743:LGBTQ rights in the United States 1333:Judy Greenwald (March 20, 2018). 528:Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp. 104:76 (2d Cir. 2017); reversed, 883 2597: 2596: 2584: 2489:Sodomy laws in the United States 1686:Biskupic, Joan (July 28, 2020): 1598:Neidig, Harper (June 15, 2020). 1445:Williams, Pete (June 15, 2020). 29: 2655:LGBT rights in New York (state) 1941:DoD Directive 1304.26 1702:Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda 1388:Liptak, Adam (April 22, 2019). 1218:Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. 914:Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. 617:Wolf, Richard (June 15, 2020). 343:Zarda's estate appealed to the 234:Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda 2650:2020 in United States case law 1527:Liptak, Adam (June 15, 2020). 1359:Adam Liptak (April 22, 2019). 1153:. Nbcnews.com. October 4, 2017 431:Altitude Express, Inc. v Zarda 24:Altitude Express, Inc.v. Zarda 1: 2540:Congressional Equality Caucus 1565:, slip op. at 8โ€“9 (2020). 247:case which ruled that under 237:, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a 726:Trudy Ring (May 30, 2018). 645:"Altitude Express v. Zarda" 621:. USA Today. Archived from 391:Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 242:United States Supreme Court 2671: 1891:303 Creative LLC v. Elenis 1814:Violence Against Women Act 1294:. Lexology. March 7, 2018. 324:District and Appeals Court 96:Summary judgment granted, 2578: 2398:Anti-LGBT curriculum laws 2376:Employment discrimination 2319: 1943:("Don't ask, don't tell") 1765: 1557:Bostock v. Clayton County 1478:Bostock v. Clayton County 436:Bostock v. Clayton County 366:friend of the court brief 358:Zarda's estate sought an 277:Bostock v. Clayton County 260:Zarda v. Altitude Express 135: 121: 28: 2290:Northern Mariana Islands 1885:Respect for Marriage Act 1820:United States v. Windsor 921: (2d Cir. 2017). 504:statutory interpretation 371:American Bar Association 2334:Conversion therapy bans 1947:Defense of Marriage Act 1913:Immigration Act of 1917 941:The Wall Street Journal 218:Alito, joined by Thomas 2344:Housing discrimination 1563:590 U. S. ____ 1198:. Apps.americanbar.org 589: 572: 523: 494: 43:Argued October 8, 2019 2555:LGBT people in prison 2430:Domestic partnerships 2410:Public accommodations 1923:Executive Order 10450 1880:Executive Order 13988 1827:Executive Order 13672 1791:Executive Order 13087 1778:Executive Order 12968 488: 338:Department of Justice 45:Decided June 15, 2020 2635:2020 in LGBT history 2415:Religious exemptions 2237:District of Columbia 1861:Harris Funeral Homes 1833:Obergefell v. Hodges 1503:Obergefell v. Hodges 1314:. September 26, 2017 1223:883 F.3d 100 580:separation of powers 513:Obergefell v. Hodges 347:. During this case, 2300:U.S. Virgin Islands 1771:One, Inc. v. Olesen 1272:. February 26, 2018 1246:. February 27, 2018 1002:. February 26, 2018 919:855 F.3d 76 158:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2449:Transgender rights 2369:Sexual orientation 1934:Bowers v. Hardwick 1534:The New York Times 1395:The New York Times 1366:The New York Times 1339:Business Insurance 1083:The New York Times 999:The New York Times 891:The New York Times 801:on August 27, 2016 625:on October 7, 2020 508:constitutional law 495: 381:Hively v. Ivy Tech 146:Associate Justices 2612: 2611: 2550:Save Our Children 2497: 2496: 2308: 2307: 1960: 1959: 1797:Lawrence v. Texas 1129:Allison Frankel. 1047:. Chicago Tribune 791:"Deaths 10-31-14" 698:. October 5, 2010 416:In May 2018, the 230: 229: 98:No. 2:10-cv-04334 2662: 2600: 2599: 2591:LGBTQ portal 2589: 2588: 2587: 2317: 2229:Federal district 1865:Altitude Express 1763: 1754: 1736: 1729: 1722: 1713: 1674: 1673: 1671: 1669: 1652: 1646: 1645: 1643: 1641: 1626: 1617: 1616: 1614: 1612: 1595: 1589: 1588: 1586: 1584: 1572: 1566: 1560: 1552: 1546: 1545: 1543: 1541: 1524: 1518: 1499: 1493: 1475: 1464: 1463: 1461: 1459: 1442: 1433: 1432: 1430: 1428: 1413: 1407: 1406: 1404: 1402: 1385: 1379: 1378: 1376: 1374: 1356: 1350: 1349: 1347: 1345: 1330: 1324: 1323: 1321: 1319: 1302: 1296: 1295: 1288: 1282: 1281: 1279: 1277: 1262: 1256: 1255: 1253: 1251: 1236: 1230: 1220: 1214: 1208: 1207: 1205: 1203: 1192: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1181: 1169: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1158: 1147: 1141: 1140: 1126: 1109: 1108: 1102: 1094: 1092: 1090: 1073: 1067: 1063: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1052: 1041: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1030: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1007: 990: 981: 980: 978: 976: 959: 953: 952: 950: 948: 931: 922: 916: 910: 904: 903: 901: 899: 882: 865: 864: 862: 860: 855:. March 12, 2018 845: 836: 835: 834: 832: 817: 811: 810: 808: 806: 787: 781: 780: 778: 776: 771:on June 25, 2018 767:. Archived from 754: 745: 744: 742: 740: 723: 708: 707: 705: 703: 688: 682: 681: 680:. March 3, 2018. 668: 662: 661: 659: 657: 641: 635: 634: 632: 630: 614: 481:Majority opinion 461:Altitude Express 441:Eleventh Circuit 131:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 2670: 2669: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2608: 2585: 2583: 2574: 2528: 2493: 2471: 2465: 2435:by municipality 2420:Same-sex unions 2381:by municipality 2349:Intersex rights 2304: 2271: 2264: 2241: 2223: 1956: 1905: 1903: 1897: 1745: 1740: 1683: 1678: 1677: 1667: 1665: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1639: 1637: 1628: 1627: 1620: 1610: 1608: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1582: 1580: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1539: 1537: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1500: 1496: 1492:___ (2020). 1476: 1467: 1457: 1455: 1444: 1443: 1436: 1426: 1424: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1400: 1398: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1372: 1370: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1343: 1341: 1332: 1331: 1327: 1317: 1315: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1290: 1289: 1285: 1275: 1273: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1249: 1247: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1201: 1199: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1179: 1177: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1156: 1154: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1128: 1127: 1112: 1095: 1088: 1086: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1060: 1050: 1048: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1028: 1026: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1005: 1003: 992: 991: 984: 974: 972: 971:. July 27, 2017 961: 960: 956: 946: 944: 933: 932: 925: 912: 911: 907: 897: 895: 894:. July 27, 2017 884: 883: 868: 858: 856: 847: 846: 839: 830: 828: 819: 818: 814: 804: 802: 789: 788: 784: 774: 772: 756: 755: 748: 738: 736: 725: 724: 711: 701: 699: 690: 689: 685: 670: 669: 665: 655: 653: 643: 642: 638: 628: 626: 616: 615: 611: 606: 594: 576:Brett Kavanaugh 563:Clarence Thomas 555: 483: 478: 406: 378:opinion on the 376:Seventh Circuit 326: 296: 194:Brett Kavanaugh 184: 174:Sonia Sotomayor 172: 160: 150:Clarence Thomas 112:, 2d Cir. 2018) 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2668: 2666: 2658: 2657: 2652: 2647: 2642: 2637: 2632: 2627: 2617: 2616: 2610: 2609: 2607: 2606: 2594: 2579: 2576: 2575: 2573: 2572: 2567: 2562: 2557: 2552: 2547: 2545:Lavender Scare 2542: 2536: 2534: 2530: 2529: 2527: 2526: 2521: 2516: 2511: 2505: 2503: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2494: 2492: 2491: 2486: 2481: 2475: 2473: 2467: 2466: 2464: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2427: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2395: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2383: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2366: 2361: 2351: 2346: 2341: 2336: 2331: 2329:Age of consent 2326: 2320: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2306: 2305: 2303: 2302: 2297: 2292: 2287: 2282: 2280:American Samoa 2276: 2274: 2270:Unincorporated 2266: 2265: 2263: 2262: 2260:Indian Country 2257: 2251: 2249: 2247:Tribal nations 2243: 2242: 2240: 2239: 2233: 2231: 2225: 2224: 2222: 2221: 2216: 2211: 2206: 2201: 2196: 2191: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2169:South Carolina 2166: 2161: 2156: 2151: 2146: 2141: 2136: 2134:North Carolina 2131: 2126: 2121: 2116: 2111: 2106: 2101: 2096: 2091: 2086: 2081: 2076: 2071: 2066: 2061: 2056: 2051: 2046: 2041: 2036: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2016: 2011: 2006: 2001: 1996: 1991: 1986: 1981: 1976: 1970: 1968: 1962: 1961: 1958: 1957: 1955: 1954: 1949: 1944: 1938: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1909: 1907: 1899: 1898: 1896: 1895: 1887: 1882: 1877: 1869: 1853: 1845: 1841:Pavan v. Smith 1837: 1829: 1824: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1801: 1793: 1788: 1784:Romer v. Evans 1780: 1775: 1766: 1760: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1741: 1739: 1738: 1731: 1724: 1716: 1710: 1709: 1682: 1681:External links 1679: 1676: 1675: 1647: 1618: 1590: 1567: 1547: 1519: 1494: 1465: 1434: 1408: 1380: 1351: 1325: 1297: 1283: 1257: 1231: 1209: 1187: 1164: 1142: 1110: 1068: 1058: 1036: 1025:. Advocate.com 1013: 982: 954: 923: 905: 866: 837: 827:, WNYC Studios 812: 782: 764:Durango Herald 746: 709: 683: 663: 636: 608: 607: 605: 602: 601: 600: 593: 590: 554: 551: 482: 479: 477: 474: 405: 402: 325: 322: 295: 292: 228: 227: 224: 220: 219: 216: 212: 211: 208: 204: 203: 199: 198: 197: 196: 162:Stephen Breyer 147: 144: 139: 133: 132: 128: 127: 119: 118: 114: 113: 94: 90: 89: 85: 84: 71: 67: 66: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2667: 2656: 2653: 2651: 2648: 2646: 2643: 2641: 2638: 2636: 2633: 2631: 2628: 2626: 2623: 2622: 2620: 2605: 2604: 2595: 2593: 2592: 2581: 2580: 2577: 2571: 2568: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2558: 2556: 2553: 2551: 2548: 2546: 2543: 2541: 2538: 2537: 2535: 2531: 2525: 2522: 2520: 2517: 2515: 2512: 2510: 2507: 2506: 2504: 2500: 2490: 2487: 2485: 2482: 2480: 2477: 2476: 2474: 2468: 2462: 2461:Bathroom bill 2459: 2455: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2447: 2443: 2440: 2436: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2428: 2426: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2418: 2416: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2404: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2396: 2394: 2391: 2387: 2384: 2382: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2365: 2362: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2347: 2345: 2342: 2340: 2337: 2335: 2332: 2330: 2327: 2325: 2322: 2321: 2318: 2315: 2311: 2301: 2298: 2296: 2293: 2291: 2288: 2286: 2283: 2281: 2278: 2277: 2275: 2273: 2267: 2261: 2258: 2256: 2255:Navajo Nation 2253: 2252: 2250: 2248: 2244: 2238: 2235: 2234: 2232: 2230: 2226: 2220: 2217: 2215: 2212: 2210: 2209:West Virginia 2207: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2155: 2152: 2150: 2147: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2137: 2135: 2132: 2130: 2127: 2125: 2122: 2120: 2117: 2115: 2114:New Hampshire 2112: 2110: 2107: 2105: 2102: 2100: 2097: 2095: 2092: 2090: 2087: 2085: 2082: 2080: 2077: 2075: 2074:Massachusetts 2072: 2070: 2067: 2065: 2062: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2052: 2050: 2047: 2045: 2042: 2040: 2037: 2035: 2032: 2030: 2027: 2025: 2022: 2020: 2017: 2015: 2012: 2010: 2007: 2005: 2002: 2000: 1997: 1995: 1992: 1990: 1987: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1977: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1969: 1967: 1963: 1953: 1950: 1948: 1945: 1942: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1910: 1908: 1900: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1886: 1883: 1881: 1878: 1875: 1874: 1870: 1867: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1792: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1755: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1737: 1732: 1730: 1725: 1723: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698:Joan Biskupic 1695: 1691: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1664: 1663: 1658: 1651: 1648: 1636: 1632: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1607: 1606: 1601: 1594: 1591: 1578: 1571: 1568: 1564: 1559: 1558: 1551: 1548: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1523: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1504: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1474: 1472: 1470: 1466: 1454: 1453: 1448: 1441: 1439: 1435: 1423: 1419: 1412: 1409: 1397: 1396: 1391: 1384: 1381: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1355: 1352: 1340: 1336: 1329: 1326: 1313: 1312: 1307: 1301: 1298: 1293: 1287: 1284: 1271: 1267: 1261: 1258: 1245: 1241: 1235: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1219: 1213: 1210: 1197: 1196:"2nd Circuit" 1191: 1188: 1175: 1168: 1165: 1152: 1146: 1143: 1138: 1137: 1132: 1125: 1123: 1121: 1119: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1100: 1085: 1084: 1079: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1046: 1040: 1037: 1024: 1017: 1014: 1001: 1000: 995: 989: 987: 983: 970: 969: 964: 958: 955: 943: 942: 937: 930: 928: 924: 920: 915: 909: 906: 893: 892: 887: 881: 879: 877: 875: 873: 871: 867: 854: 850: 844: 842: 838: 826: 822: 816: 813: 800: 796: 792: 786: 783: 770: 766: 765: 760: 753: 751: 747: 735: 734: 729: 722: 720: 718: 716: 714: 710: 697: 693: 687: 684: 679: 678: 673: 667: 664: 652: 651: 646: 640: 637: 624: 620: 613: 610: 603: 599: 596: 595: 591: 588: 583: 581: 577: 571: 566: 564: 560: 552: 550: 546: 544: 540: 536: 535: 530: 529: 522: 517: 515: 514: 509: 505: 500: 492: 487: 480: 475: 473: 470: 466: 462: 458: 457:individuals. 456: 452: 451: 446: 445:Fifth Circuit 442: 438: 437: 432: 427: 424: 419: 414: 411: 408:Prior to the 404:Supreme Court 403: 401: 399: 398: 393: 392: 385: 383: 382: 377: 372: 367: 363: 362: 356: 354: 350: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 323: 321: 319: 315: 310: 306: 302: 293: 291: 289: 285: 284: 279: 278: 273: 272:circuit split 269: 265: 261: 256: 252: 250: 246: 243: 240: 236: 235: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202:Case opinions 200: 195: 191: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 148: 145: 143: 140: 138:Chief Justice 137: 136: 134: 129: 125: 120: 115: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 86: 82: 81: 76: 72: 68: 65: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 2601: 2582: 2425:Civil unions 2174:South Dakota 2164:Rhode Island 2159:Pennsylvania 2139:North Dakota 1937: (1986) 1932: 1906:federal laws 1889: 1871: 1868: (2020) 1864: 1855: 1852: (2018) 1847: 1844: (2016) 1839: 1836: (2015) 1831: 1823: (2013) 1818: 1800: (2003) 1795: 1787: (1996) 1782: 1774: (1958) 1769: 1701: 1687: 1666:. Retrieved 1660: 1650: 1638:. Retrieved 1609:. Retrieved 1603: 1593: 1581:. Retrieved 1570: 1555: 1550: 1538:. Retrieved 1532: 1522: 1517: (2015). 1501: 1497: 1477: 1456:. Retrieved 1450: 1425:. Retrieved 1411: 1399:. Retrieved 1393: 1383: 1371:. Retrieved 1369:. Washington 1364: 1354: 1342:. Retrieved 1338: 1328: 1316:. Retrieved 1309: 1300: 1286: 1274:. Retrieved 1269: 1260: 1248:. Retrieved 1243: 1234: 1217: 1212: 1200:. Retrieved 1190: 1178:. Retrieved 1167: 1155:. Retrieved 1145: 1134: 1087:. Retrieved 1081: 1071: 1061: 1049:. Retrieved 1039: 1027:. Retrieved 1016: 1004:. Retrieved 997: 973:. Retrieved 966: 957: 945:. Retrieved 939: 913: 908: 896:. Retrieved 889: 857:. Retrieved 853:The Advocate 852: 829:, retrieved 824: 815: 803:. Retrieved 799:the original 795:Dallas Voice 794: 785: 773:. Retrieved 769:the original 762: 737:. Retrieved 733:The Advocate 731: 700:. Retrieved 696:CBS New York 695: 686: 675: 666: 654:. Retrieved 648: 639: 627:. Retrieved 623:the original 612: 585: 573: 568: 559:Samuel Alito 556: 547: 542: 538: 532: 526: 524: 519: 511: 499:Neil Gorsuch 496: 491:Neil Gorsuch 468: 464: 460: 459: 448: 434: 430: 428: 422: 417: 415: 409: 407: 395: 389: 386: 379: 359: 357: 353:Barack Obama 349:Donald Trump 342: 327: 318:BASE jumping 297: 287: 281: 275: 259: 257: 253: 245:civil rights 233: 232: 231: 189: 186:Neil Gorsuch 177: 170:Samuel Alito 165: 153: 142:John Roberts 109: 88:Case history 78: 53: 15: 2470:Repealed or 2393:Immigration 2359:Transgender 2339:Hate crimes 2295:Puerto Rico 2272:territories 2089:Mississippi 2004:Connecticut 1902:Repealed or 1229: 2018). 455:transgender 314:Switzerland 301:Long Island 182:Elena Kagan 2619:Categories 2472:overturned 2204:Washington 2124:New Mexico 2119:New Jersey 1994:California 1904:overturned 1579:. ABC News 1427:October 8, 629:October 8, 604:References 394:, as well 309:homophobic 294:Background 60:Docket no. 2502:Movements 2214:Wisconsin 2179:Tennessee 2084:Minnesota 2059:Louisiana 1750:By entity 1401:April 22, 1373:April 23, 1318:March 29, 1276:March 28, 1250:March 28, 1202:March 31, 1180:March 31, 1176:. Fortune 1157:March 31, 1089:March 31, 1051:March 31, 1029:March 31, 1006:March 28, 975:April 12, 947:April 12, 898:March 28, 859:March 28, 831:March 14, 805:March 29, 702:March 29, 656:March 16, 423:Advocate, 226:Kavanaugh 126:affirmed. 70:Citations 2603:Category 2442:Marriage 2364:Intersex 2354:Military 2324:Adoption 2199:Virginia 2149:Oklahoma 2129:New York 2104:Nebraska 2094:Missouri 2079:Michigan 2069:Maryland 2054:Kentucky 2034:Illinois 2009:Delaware 1999:Colorado 1989:Arkansas 1706:Archived 1668:June 15, 1662:Politico 1640:June 15, 1611:June 15, 1605:The Hill 1583:June 15, 1540:June 15, 1458:June 15, 1452:NBC News 1344:June 24, 1244:NBC News 1099:cite web 775:June 25, 739:June 24, 677:NBC News 592:See also 574:Justice 557:Justice 553:Dissents 543:Phillips 497:Justice 489:Justice 476:Decision 418:Advocate 305:New York 239:landmark 207:Majority 2533:Related 2313:By type 2219:Wyoming 2194:Vermont 2099:Montana 2039:Indiana 2019:Georgia 2014:Florida 1984:Arizona 1974:Alabama 1857:Bostock 1758:Federal 1482:17-1618 1270:Reuters 1227:2d Cir. 1136:Reuters 968:Reuters 539:Manhart 465:Bostock 410:en banc 361:en banc 288:Bostock 268:en banc 223:Dissent 215:Dissent 117:Holding 110:en banc 64:17-1623 2454:voting 2154:Oregon 2109:Nevada 2049:Kansas 2024:Hawaii 1979:Alaska 1966:States 1894:(2023) 1876:(2020) 1561:, 1506:, 1484:, 1480:, No. 1225: ( 1221:, 917:, 469:Harris 192: 190:· 188:  180: 178:· 176:  168: 166:· 164:  156: 154:· 152:  2184:Texas 2064:Maine 2029:Idaho 1510: 1488: 825:Nancy 316:in a 108:100 ( 93:Prior 77:___ ( 2285:Guam 2189:Utah 2144:Ohio 2044:Iowa 1670:2020 1642:2020 1613:2020 1585:2020 1542:2020 1512:U.S. 1490:U.S. 1460:2020 1429:2019 1422:CNBC 1403:2019 1375:2019 1346:2018 1320:2018 1278:2018 1252:2018 1204:2018 1182:2018 1159:2018 1105:link 1091:2018 1053:2018 1031:2018 1008:2018 977:2018 949:2018 900:2018 861:2018 833:2018 807:2018 777:2018 741:2018 704:2018 658:2020 650:Oyez 631:2020 467:and 106:F.3d 102:F.3d 80:more 75:U.S. 73:590 1694:CNN 1635:CNN 1515:644 1508:576 1486:590 1311:CNN 541:or 2621:: 1704:. 1659:. 1633:. 1621:^ 1602:. 1531:. 1468:^ 1449:. 1437:^ 1420:. 1392:. 1363:. 1337:. 1308:. 1268:. 1242:. 1133:. 1113:^ 1101:}} 1097:{{ 1080:. 996:. 985:^ 965:. 938:. 926:^ 888:. 869:^ 851:. 840:^ 823:, 793:. 761:. 749:^ 730:. 712:^ 694:. 674:. 647:. 463:, 303:, 1863:/ 1859:/ 1735:e 1728:t 1721:v 1672:. 1644:. 1615:. 1587:. 1544:. 1462:. 1431:. 1405:. 1377:. 1348:. 1322:. 1280:. 1254:. 1206:. 1184:. 1161:. 1139:. 1107:) 1093:. 1055:. 1033:. 1010:. 979:. 951:. 902:. 863:. 809:. 779:. 743:. 706:. 660:. 633:. 83:)

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
17-1623
U.S.
more
No. 2:10-cv-04334
F.3d
F.3d
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
landmark
United States Supreme Court
civil rights
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
en banc
circuit split
Bostock v. Clayton County
R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Long Island
New York
homophobic
Switzerland

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘