1910:. It is a method of teaching that revolves around using analogies in the classroom to better explain topics. She thought of the idea to use analogies as a part of curriculum because she was observing objects once and she said, "my mind was noting what else each object reminded me of..." This led her to teach with the question, "what does remind you of?" The idea of comparing subjects and concepts led to the development of The Private Eye Project as a method of teaching. The program is designed to build critical thinking skills with analogies as one of the main themes revolving around it. While Glynn focuses on using analogies to teach science, The Private Eye Project can be used for any subject including writing, math, art, social studies, and invention. It is now used by thousands of schools around the country.
1903:
Step one is introducing the new topic that is about to be taught and giving some general knowledge on the subject. Step two is reviewing the concept that the students already know to ensure they have the proper knowledge to assess the similarities between the two concepts. Step three is finding relevant features within the analogy of the two concepts. Step four is finding similarities between the two concepts so students are able to compare and contrast them in order to understand. Step five is indicating where the analogy breaks down between the two concepts. And finally, step six is drawing a conclusion about the analogy and comparing the new material with the already learned material. Typically this method is used to learn topics in science.
1899:
are more familiar with. It may help to create or clarify one theory (or theoretical model) via the workings of another theory (or theoretical model). Thus an analogy, as used in teaching, would be comparing a topic that students are already familiar with, with a new topic that is being introduced, so that students can get a better understanding of the new topic by relating back to existing knowledge. This can be particularly helpful when the analogy serves across different disciplines: indeed, there are various teaching innovations now emerging that use sight-based analogies for teaching and research across subjects such as science and the humanities.
1773:
cognitive development as continuing to focus on specific objects would reduce children's ability to learn abstract patterns and reason analogically. Interestingly, some researchers have proposed that children's basic brain functions (i.e., working memory and inhibitory control) do not drive this relational shift. Instead, it is driven by their relational knowledge, such as having labels for the objects that make the relationships clearer(see previous section). However, there is not enough evidence to determine whether the relational shift is actually because basic brain functions become better or relational knowledge becomes deeper.
1740:, is a theory in psychology that describes the psychological processes involved in reasoning through, and learning from, analogies. More specifically, this theory aims to describe how familiar knowledge, or knowledge about a base domain, can be used to inform an individual's understanding of a less familiar idea, or a target domain. According to this theory, individuals view their knowledge of ideas, or domains, as interconnected structures. In other words, a domain is viewed as consisting of objects, their properties, and the relationships that characterise their interactions. The process of analogy then involves:
1553:, although lower levels can be used as well. Similarity demands that the mapping connects similar elements and relationships between source and target, at any level of abstraction. It is the highest when there are identical relations and when connected elements have many identical attributes. An analogy achieves its purpose if it helps solve the problem at hand. The multiconstraint theory faces some difficulties when there are multiple sources, but these can be overcome. Hummel and Holyoak (2005) recast the multiconstraint theory within a
311:
876:
1592:. Perception is necessary for analogy, but analogy is also necessary for high-level perception. Chalmers et al. concludes that analogy actually is high-level perception. Forbus et al. (1998) claim that this is only a metaphor. It has been argued (Morrison and Dietrich 1995) that Hofstadter's and Gentner's groups do not defend opposite views, but are instead dealing with different aspects of analogy.
1028:. According to this view, analogy depends on the mapping or alignment of the elements of source and target. The mapping takes place not only between objects, but also between relations of objects and between relations of relations. The whole mapping yields the assignment of a predicate or a relation to the target. Structure mapping theory has been applied and has found considerable confirmation in
132:
1842:
1050:
84:
43:
993:
2013:"truly the kissis common both to him who kisses and to him who is kissed. If, as is properly understood, the Father is he who kisses, the Son he who is kissed, then it cannot be wrong to see in the kiss the Holy Spirit, for he is the imperturbable peace of the Father and the Son, their unshakable bond, their undivided love, their indivisible unity."
1902:
Shawn Glynn, a professor in the department of educational psychology and instructional technology at the
University of Georgia, developed a theory on teaching with analogies and developed steps to explain the process of teaching with this method. The steps for teaching with analogies are as follows:
1526:
to mathematically demonstrate how such reasoning could arise naturally by using relationships between the internal arrows that keep the internal structures of the categories rather than the mere relationships between the objects (called "representational states"). Thus, the mind, and more intelligent
1247:
formation of structures such as words. Others argue that they are in fact the same and that rules are analogies that have essentially become standard parts of the linguistic system, whereas clearer cases of analogy have simply not (yet) done so (e.g. Langacker 1987.445–447). This view agrees with the
903:
used a wider notion of analogy. They saw analogy as a shared abstraction. Analogous objects did not share necessarily a relation, but also an idea, a pattern, a regularity, an attribute, an effect or a philosophy. These authors also accepted that comparisons, metaphors and "images" (allegories) could
2031:
Other analogies exist. The analogy of notes of a chord, say C major, is a sufficient analogy for the
Trinity. The notes C, E, and G individually fill the whole of the “heard” space, but when all notes come together, we have a homogenized sound within the same space with distinctive, equal notes. One
1754:
In general, it has been found that people prefer analogies where the two systems correspond highly to each other (e.g. have similar relationships across the domains as opposed to just having similar objects across domains) when these people try to compare and contrast the systems. This is also known
1898:
Analogies as defined in rhetoric are a comparison between words, but an analogy more generally can also be used to illustrate and teach. To enlighten pupils on the relations between or within certain concepts, items or phenomena, a teacher may refer to other concepts, items or phenomena that pupils
1758:
An example that has been used to illustrate structure mapping theory comes from
Gentner and Gentner (1983) and uses the base domain of flowing water and the target domain of electricity. In a system of flowing water, the water is carried through pipes and the rate of water flow is determined by the
1763:
In a circuit, the electricity is carried through wires and the current, or rate of flow of electricity, is determined by the voltage, or electrical pressure. Given the similarity in structure, or structural alignment, between these domains, structure mapping theory would predict that relationships
1295:
Analogy can be used in theoretical and applied sciences in the form of models or simulations which can be considered as strong indications of probable correctness. Other, much weaker, analogies may also assist in understanding and describing nuanced or key functional behaviours of systems that are
1776:
Additionally, research has identified several factors that may increase the likelihood that a child may spontaneously engage in comparison and learn an abstract relationship, without the need for prompts. Comparison is more likely when the objects to be compared are close together in space and/or
1772:
Children do not always need prompting to make comparisons in order to learn abstract relationships. Eventually, children undergo a relational shift, after which they begin seeing similar relations across different situations instead of merely looking at matching objects. This is critical in their
1696:
In historical science, comparative historical analysis often uses the concept of analogy and analogical reasoning. Recent methods involving calculation operate on large document archives, allowing for analogical or corresponding terms from the past to be found as a response to random questions by
2027:
Many analogies have been used to explain the
Trinity, however, all analogies fail when taken too far. Examples of these are the analogies that state that the Trinity is like water and its different states (solid, liquid, gas) or like an egg with its different parts (shell, yolk, and egg white).
2970:
Zhang, Y., Jatowt, A., Bhowmick, S., & Tanaka, K. (2015, July). Omnia mutantur, nihil interit: Connecting past with present by finding corresponding terms across time. In
Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint
1271:
Analogical arguments can also be probative, meaning that they serve as a means of proving the rightness of particular theses and theories. This application of analogical reasoning in science is debatable. Analogy can help prove important theories, especially in those kinds of science in which
1506:
test. The algorithm measures the similarity of relations between pairs of words (e.g., the similarity between the pairs HAND:PALM and FOOT:SOLE) by statistically analysing a large collection of text. It answers SAT questions by selecting the choice with the highest relational similarity.
2032:
more analogy used is one that uses the mythological dog, Cerberus, that guards the gates of Hades. While the dog itself is a single organism—speaking to its substance—Cerberus has different centers of awareness due to its three heads, each of which has the same dog nature.
1562:
attributes or relations at some level of abstraction. The model was extended (Doumas, Hummel, and
Sandhofer, 2008) to learn relations from unstructured examples (providing the only current account of how symbolic representations can be learned from examples).
572:
may be equivalent to that of analogy. Analogy is also a basis for any comparative arguments as well as experiments whose results are transmitted to objects that have been not under examination (e.g., experiments on rats when results are applied to humans).
1795:, analogy is a method of resolving issues on which there is no previous authority. The legal use of analogy is distinguished by the need to use a legally relevant basis for drawing an analogy between two situations. It may be applied to various forms of
1935:. The consequence of this theory is that all true statements concerning God (excluding the concrete details of Jesus' earthly life) are rough analogies, without implying any falsehood. Such analogical and true statements would include
1994:
that has been revealed, not something obvious or derivable from first principles or found in any thing in the created world. Because of this, the use of analogies to understand the
Trinity is common and perhaps necessary.
2983:
Zhang, Yating, Adam Jatowt, and
Katsumi Tanaka. "Towards understanding word embeddings: Automatically explaining similarity of terms." In 2016 IEEE international conference on big data (big data), pp. 823-832. IEEE, 2016.
1557:
architecture. A problem for the multiconstraint theory arises from its concept of similarity, which, in this respect, is not obviously different from analogy itself. Computer applications demand that there are some
926:, demonstrated that analogy is a systematic and universal feature of natural languages, with identifiable and law-like characteristics which explain how the meanings of words in a sentence are interdependent.
1123:
In the field of testing, the colon notation of ratios and equality is often borrowed, so that the example above might be rendered, "Smile : mouth :: wink : eye" and pronounced the same way.
1573:(IAM) to include working memory constraints as well as structural, semantic and pragmatic constraints, so that a subset of the base analogue is selected and mapping from base to target occurs in series.
1584:, including high-level perception, and analogical thinking. In fact, analogy occurs not only after, but also before and at the same time as high-level perception. In high-level perception, humans make
1998:
The
Trinity is a combination of the words “tri,” meaning “three,” and “unity,” meaning “one.” The “Threeness” refers to the persons of the Trinity, while the “Oneness” refers to substance or being.
1116:
when representing the analogous relationship between two pairs of expressions, for example, "Smile is to mouth, as wink is to eye." In the field of mathematics and logic, this can be formalized with
2712:
3645:
Cognitive
Science, 7, 155–170. (Reprinted in A. Collins & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Readings in cognitive science: A perspective from psychology and artificial intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Kaufmann).
2028:
However, these analogies, if taken too far, could teach the heresies of modalism (water states) and partialism (parts of egg), which are contrary to the Christian understanding of the Trinity.
2064:
Islamic jurisprudence makes ample use of analogy as a means of making conclusions from outside sources of law. The bounds and rules employed to make analogical deduction vary greatly between
1292:
when it relates to those areas of the cosmos (the universe) that are beyond any data-based observation and knowledge about them stems from the human insight and thinking outside the senses.
1713:
and fair. If it is wrong to do something in a situation A, and situation B corresponds to A in all related features, then it is also wrong to perform that action in situation B.
2258:
2237:
1978:
The use of theological statements in syllogisms must take into account their analogical essence, in that every analogy breaks down when stretched beyond its intended meaning.
1428:
1351:
299:
expression corresponding to such a process. The term analogy can also refer to the relation between the source and the target themselves, which is often (though not always) a
3635:
1450:
1399:
1373:
789:
between a hand and its palm to a foot and its sole. While a hand and a foot have many dissimilarities, the analogy focuses on their similarity in having an inner surface.
731:) or proper proportionality, e.g., "2 is to 1 as 4 is to 2", or "the goodness of humans is relative to their essence as the goodness of God is relative to God's essence."
1478:
has to map objects of C to objects of D and arrows of C to arrows of D in such a way that the structure of their respective parts is preserved. This is similar to the
4088:
4080:
2713:
https://www.academia.edu/33380466/Going_with_the_flow_Using_analogies_to_explain_electric_circuits_Going_with_the_flow_Using_analogies_to_explain_electric_circuits
2234:, revised and augmented throughout by Sir Henry Stuart Jones, with the assistance of Roderick McKenzie (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940) on Perseus Digital Library.
693:
that have different but related meanings. Not only a person can be "healthy", but also the food that is good for health (see the contemporary distinction between
1577:
shows that humans are better at using and creating analogies when the information is presented in an order where an item and its analogue are placed together..
1580:
Eqaan Doug and his team challenged the shared structure theory and mostly its applications in computer science. They argue that there is no clear line between
1032:. It has had reasonable success in computer science and artificial intelligence (see below). Some studies extended the approach to specific subjects, such as
3722:
1268:
Analogies are mainly used as a means of creating new ideas and hypotheses, or testing them, which is called a heuristic function of analogical reasoning.
2683:
1174:
2711:
Going with the flow: Using analogies to explain electric circuits. Mark D. Walker and David Garlovsky. School Science Review, 97, no. 361 (2016): 51-58.
3408:
3607:
1676:
Where two or more biological or physical participants meet, they communicate and the stresses produced describe internal models of the participants.
3876:
2040:
In some Protestant theology, "analogy" may itself be used analogously in terms, more in a sense of "rule" or "exemplar": for example the concept "
2474:
Hallaq, Wael B. (1985–1986). "The Logic of Legal Reasoning in Religious and Non-Religious Cultures: The Case of Islamic Law and the Common Law".
249:
is a comparison or correspondence between two things (or two groups of things) because of a third element that they are considered to share.
3872:
Melandri, Enzo. La linea e il circolo. Studio logico-filosofico sull'analogia (1968), Quodlibet, Macerata 2004 prefazione di Giorgio Agamben.
3533:
3508:
3256:
3214:
3062:
2652:
2610:
2180:
1777:
time, are highly similar (although not so similar that they match, which interfere with identifying relationships), or share common labels.
2577:
2517:
3153:
3805:
2170:
3811:
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive grammar. Vol. I, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2435:
2229:
1064:
1060:
3705:
3690:
3657:
3173:
1925:
For between creator and creature there can be noted no similarity so great that a greater dissimilarity cannot be seen between them.
1885:
707:
wrote an influential treatise on analogy. In all of these cases, the wide Platonic and Aristotelian notion of analogy was preserved.
233:
215:
70:
1852:
4123:
1717:
accepts such reasoning, instead of deduction and induction, since only the first can be used regardless of any moral principles.
1566:
1320:. In detail, this means that if two mathematical structures are of the same type, an analogy between them can be thought of as a
3600:
2275:
341:
Analogy plays a significant role in human thought processes. It has been argued that analogy lies at "the core of cognition".
153:
3963:
Shelley, C. (2003). Multiple analogies in Science and Philosophy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
1688:
that describes both similarities and differences between any pair of the participants' internal models or concepts exists.
4118:
2794:"Categorial Compositionality II: Universal Constructions and a General Theory of (Quasi-)Systematicity in Human Cognition"
759:
3372:
1657:
are used to test scale models of wings and aircraft which are analogous to (correspond to) full-size wings and aircraft.
3772:
Keane, M.T. (1997). "What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure in analogical mapping".
2909:
Keane, M.T. (1997). "What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure in analogical mapping".
506:
3678:(eds.) The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2001, pp. 499–538.
1137:
process that reduces word forms thought to break rules to more common forms that follow these rules. For example, the
939:
621:
196:
1867:
102:
168:
3451:
Johnson, Katie. Educational Leadership: Exploring the World with the Private Eye. September 1995. 16 October 2013 .
2546:
1863:
1076:
142:
3719:
1815:
1554:
1542:
438:
3731:
Itkonen, E. (2005). Analogy as Structure and Process. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
1008:
close to that of Plato and Aristotle, but framed by Gentner's (1983) structure mapping theory. The same idea of
912:. Analogies should also make those abstractions easier to understand and give confidence to those who use them.
1811:
1731:
1585:
1497:
1482:
of Dedre Gentner, because it formalises the idea of analogy as a function which makes certain conditions true.
1244:
541:
175:
149:
56:
31:
3743:
2859:
Keane, M.T. and Brayshaw, M. (1988). The Incremental Analogical Machine: a computational model of analogy. In
2691:
1260:
to describe any morphological change in a language that cannot be explained merely sound change or borrowing.
3369:"Crosstalk, Mutation, Chaos: bridge-building between the sciences and literary studies using Visual Analogy"
2130:
1907:
1511:
300:
3896:
Perelman, Ch, Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969), The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, Notre Dame 1969.
3735:
2085:
1528:
1237:
1170:
951:
816:), it is more difficult to identify and describe the exact relation that holds both between pairs such as
545:
182:
98:
3416:
3380:
2105:
2090:
2068:
and to a lesser extent individual scholars. It is nonetheless a generally accepted source of law within
2006:
1589:
1502:
A computer algorithm has achieved human-level performance on multiple-choice analogy questions from the
1102:
1005:
565:
292:
433:. It lies behind basic tasks such as the identification of places, objects and people, for example, in
1404:
1327:
4065:
2805:
2746:
2735:"Categorial Compositionality: A Category Theory Explanation for the Systematicity of Human Cognition"
2135:
2095:
1635:
1541:(1997) developed their multiconstraint theory within structure mapping theory. They defend that the "
1491:
859:
781:
are different cognitive processes, and analogy is often an easier one. This analogy is not comparing
457:
3642:
3042:
164:
2172:
The Oxford Companion to the English Language$ The Oxford Companion to the English Language (2 ed.)
2110:
1714:
1685:
1681:
1546:
1453:
1117:
1017:
1013:
577:
569:
269:
265:
261:
3663:
1433:
1382:
1356:
4128:
4033:
4015:
3994:
3976:
3967:
Turney, P.D.; Littman, M.L. (2005). "Corpus-based learning of analogies and semantic relations".
3924:
3861:
3832:
3262:
3241:
Language and Concept Acquisition from Infancy Through Childhood: Learning from Multiple Exemplars
3125:
3020:
2874:
2574:
2494:
2339:
1971:
must be classed as analogies that allow human cognition of what is infinitely beyond positive or
1747:
Finding deeper similarities by mapping other relationships of a base domain to the target domain.
1639:
1574:
1510:
The analogical reasoning in the human mind is free of the false inferences plaguing conventional
958:
common attribute, which is known about only in the source of the analogy, in the following form:
915:
864:
833:
605:
549:
442:
3589:, Koren, Henry J. and Bushinski, Edward A (trans.), 1953, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
804:?" For example, "Hand is to palm as foot is to ____?" These questions were usually given in the
3883:
3789:
3701:
3686:
3653:
3529:
3504:
3319:
3311:
3252:
3210:
3169:
3165:
3117:
3109:
3058:
2926:
2833:
2774:
2658:
2648:
2616:
2606:
2509:
2252:
2176:
1760:
1601:
1519:
1297:
1209:
1009:
585:
426:
314:
304:
3712:
2598:
1120:
to represent the relationships, using single colon for ratio, and double colon for equality.
800:
college admission tests, that included "analogy questions" in the form "A is to B as C is to
27:
Cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject to another
4113:
4025:
3986:
3945:
3916:
3853:
3824:
3781:
3758:
3623:
3349:
3301:
3244:
3202:
3161:
3099:
3050:
3010:
2918:
2889:
2860:
2823:
2813:
2764:
2754:
2642:
2404:
2331:
1991:
1661:
1138:
1025:
943:
809:
449:
318:
257:
3697:
3682:
3649:
2431:
3726:
3469:
3429:
3393:
2581:
2279:
1665:
1523:
1463:
1376:
1296:
otherwise difficult to grasp or prove. For instance, an analogy used in physics textbooks
875:
434:
390:
386:
276:, or the conclusion, is general rather than particular in nature. It has the general form
1814:
tradition, analogy is most typically used for filling gaps in a statutory scheme. In the
1668:) used the flow of water in its pipes as an analogue to the flow of money in an economy.
716:
named several kinds of analogy that had been used but previously unnamed, particularly:
3237:"Structure-Mapping Processes Enable Infants' Learning Across Domains Including Language"
2985:
2809:
2750:
2543:
Conceptual Structures for Knowledge Creation and Communication, Proceedings of ICCS 2003
358:
310:
295:
of a particular subject (the analog, or source) onto another (the target); and also the
4051:
3675:
3614:
Drescher, F (2017). "Analogy in Thomas Aquinas and Ludwig Wittgenstein. A comparison".
2828:
2793:
2769:
2734:
2292:
2204:
2125:
2046:
2041:
1931:
1796:
747:
704:
674:
643:
637:
402:
363:
354:
4059:
3907:
Ross, J.F. (October 1970). "Analogy and The Resolution of Some Cognitivity Problems".
3196:
1822:. The use of analogy in both traditions is broadly described by the traditional maxim
992:
4107:
4071:
3844:
Little, J (2008). "The Role of Analogy in George Gamow's Derivation of Drop Energy".
3836:
3801:
3763:
3671:
3667:
3266:
2894:
2561:
2392:
2120:
1800:
1786:
1737:
1623:
1534:
1273:
1257:
1253:
855:
793:
661:
430:
394:
189:
3936:
Ross, J.F. (September 1961). "Analogy as a Rule of Meaning for Religious Language".
3865:
4037:
3998:
3481:
3129:
3024:
2534:
2271:
2069:
1972:
1710:
1654:
1538:
1457:
1313:
935:
771:
658:
553:
510:
334:
106:
62:
3891:
Advancing the Frontiers of Heterodox Economics: Essays in Honor of Frederic S. Lee
3368:
3235:
Hespos, Susan J.; Anderson, Erin; Gentner, Dedre (2020), Childers, Jane B. (ed.),
2971:
Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 645-655).
2818:
2759:
584:. The last few decades have shown a renewed interest in analogy, most notably in
3248:
2449:
The Use of Analogies and Heuristics in Teaching Introductory Statistical Methods
2150:
1677:
1550:
1317:
1134:
955:
778:
651:
601:
561:
422:
288:
131:
4029:
3785:
3015:
2998:
2922:
3990:
3857:
3828:
3353:
3236:
3054:
2002:
1750:
Cross-checking those findings against existing knowledge of the target domain.
1627:
1581:
1301:
1285:
1198:
1029:
1021:
997:
534:
526:
410:
398:
330:
326:
3315:
3113:
2662:
2641:
Schwartz, Linda; Heidrich, Stanley H.; Heidrich, Delana S. (1 January 2007).
2513:
808:
format: HAND : PALM : : FOOT : ____ While most competent
3592:
Chalmers, D.J. et al. (1991). Chalmers, D.J., French, R.M., Hofstadter, D.,
2620:
2409:
2115:
2100:
1819:
1650:
1619:
1321:
1289:
1277:
1221:
1165:
by using the power of analogy (or by applying the more frequently used Verb-
1150:
900:
805:
597:
557:
453:
414:
284:
253:
3323:
3121:
2837:
2778:
863:
held to this notion of analogy, arguing that there can be exactly the same
667:, analogical arguments were accepted in order to explain the attributes of
564:, metaphor, resemblance, and similarity are closely related to analogy. In
3793:
3206:
2930:
2605:. Piscataway, New Jersey: Research & Education Assoc. pp. 84–86.
1549:
and purpose. Structural consistency is the highest when the analogy is an
1179:
1145:
3409:"Scientific Visualizations used as visual analogies in other disciplines"
2140:
1804:
1764:
from one of these domains, would be inferred in the other using analogy.
1706:
1653:
is built to model and represent some other physical object. For example,
1281:
1215:
1203:
1173:. Analogies can sometimes create rule-breaking forms; one example is the
1033:
905:
812:
speakers will immediately give the right answer to the analogy question (
734:
698:
694:
664:
480:
469:
461:
296:
17:
3949:
3593:
2972:
2684:"underwhelm - definition of underwhelm in English | Oxford Dictionaries"
2538:
2238:"Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, ἀναλογ-ία"
1466:
takes the idea of mathematical analogy much further with the concept of
1248:
current views of analogy in cognitive science which are discussed above.
3928:
3627:
3306:
3289:
3152:
Gentner, Dedre; Smith, Linsey A. (2013-03-11). Reisberg, Daniel (ed.).
3104:
3087:
2863:(Ed). European working session on learning. (pp.53–62). London: Pitman.
2343:
2319:
2145:
2065:
1987:
1607:
1467:
922:(1982), the first substantive examination of the topic since Cajetan's
880:
762:, in the mathematical sense, and it was indeed sometimes translated to
713:
522:
514:
502:
473:
418:
273:
4096:
3681:
Holland, J.H., Holyoak, K.J., Nisbett, R.E., and Thagard, P. (1986).
2073:
1631:
1474:
from C to D can be thought of as an analogy between C and D, because
1201:
can also be formed by analogy with existing words. A good example is
625:
465:
406:
3920:
2335:
1870:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
1324:
which preserves some or all of the relevant structure. For example,
624:, analogical reasoning was used for the process of qiyas in Islamic
4020:
3981:
3815:
Little, J (2000). "Analogy in Science: Where Do We Go From Here?".
3774:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
3720:
Relational Reasoning in a Neurally Plausible Cognitive Architecture
3340:
Langenbucher, Katja (1998). "Argument by Analogy In European Law".
2911:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
1744:
Recognising similar structures between the base and target domains.
785:
the properties between a hand and a foot, but rather comparing the
2647:. Huntington Beach, Calif.: Creative Teaching Press. pp. 4–.
2059:
991:
896:
763:
518:
309:
3958:
A Critical Analysis of the Theory of Analogy of St Thomas Aquinas
3744:"Constraints on analogical mapping: a comparison of three models"
3608:
A Theory of the Discovery and Predication of Relational Concepts.
2875:"Constraints on analogical mapping: a comparison of three models"
1527:
AIs, may use analogies between domains whose internal structures
770:. Analogy was understood as identity of relation between any two
1818:
tradition, it is most typically used for extending the scope of
1615:
1161:. These old-fashioned forms have been discarded and replaced by
1141:
1004:
Contemporary cognitive scientists use a wide notion of analogy,
629:
610:
497:
322:
3088:"Structural alignment facilitates the noticing of differences"
1835:
1792:
1503:
1043:
888:
884:
797:
668:
581:
530:
501:
also rely on an analogical understanding by the receiver of a
125:
77:
36:
2365:
1761:
corresponds to that of electricity flowing through a circuit.
4076:"Precedent and Analogy in Legal Reasoning", by Grant Lamond.
3884:
Analogies we suffer by: the case of the state as a household
3243:, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 79–104,
724:) or improper proportionality, e.g., "This food is healthy."
2393:"htA Trace of Similarity within Even Greater Dissimilarity"
3683:
Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery
3606:
Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J.E., and Sandhofer, C. (2008).
1929:
The theological exploration of this subject is called the
4006:
Turney, P.D. (2006). "Similarity of semantic relations".
3650:
The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science.
3603:. Ed. Johnson J. Puthenpurackal. Bangalore: ATC. 1:64-68.
2999:"Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy*"
1759:
pressure of the water towers or hills. This relationship
452:
but a kind of thought. Specific analogical language uses
260:
from one particular to another particular, as opposed to
3648:
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K.J., Kokinov, B. (Eds.) (2001).
3643:
Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.
3460:
The Private Eye Project. The Private Eye Project. 2013.
2370:
Interdisciplinary Encyclogpedia of Religion and Science
1859:
1304:
based on electrical, electronic or mechanical devices.
1072:
4097:
Computational approaches to computing temporal analogy
1101:
Logicians analyze how analogical reasoning is used in
3566:
Philosophical Foundations for the Christian Worldview
2044:" has been proposed as an alternative to the concept
1828:(where the reason is the same, the law is the same).
1436:
1407:
1385:
1359:
1330:
613:
lawyers used analogical reasoning and the Greek word
2792:
Phillips, Steven; Wilson, William H. (August 2011).
1705:
Analogical reasoning plays a very important part in
1225:
have followed. Another example is the humorous term
445:
has argued that analogy is "the core of cognition".
4056:"Analogy and Analogical Reasoning", by Paul Bartha.
2297:
Language, Cognition, and Computation Seminar Series
2209:
Language, Cognition, and Computation Seminar Series
1906:In 1989, teacher Kerry Ruef began a program titled
1545:" of an analogy depends on structural consistency,
1298:
compares electrical circuits to hydraulic circuits.
521:give many examples of its application) but also in
156:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
3882:Pessali, H.; Dalto, F. and Fernández, R. (2015).
3594:High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy
2733:Phillips, Steven; Wilson, William H. (July 2010).
2022:, Sermon 8: The Holy Spirit, the Kiss of the Mouth
1444:
1422:
1393:
1367:
1345:
1020:theorists. Structure mapping theory concerns both
954:inference from common known attributes to another
93:may lack focus or may be about more than one topic
3195:Gentner, Dedre; Stevens, Albert L. (2014-01-14).
1709:. This may be because morality is supposed to be
1610:, two anatomical structures are considered to be
1588:by selecting relevant information from low-level
1236:Some people present analogy as an alternative to
654:saw an increased use and theorization of analogy.
505:including them. Analogy is important not only in
2597:Research and Education Association (June 1994).
2432:"Journal of Statistics Education, V11N2: Martin"
2257:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (
3335:
3333:
2011:
1638:and should be contrasted with structures which
272:. It is also used of where at least one of the
3442:Glynn, Shawn M. Teaching with Analogies. 2008.
2072:, with the chief opposition to it forming the
1697:users (e.g., Myanmar - Burma) and explained.
996:According to Shelley (2003), the study of the
283:In a broader sense, analogical reasoning is a
97:Please help improve this article, possibly by
3960:, (Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms Inc).
3636:Analogy just looks like high-level perception
580:by philosophers, scientists, theologists and
576:Analogy has been studied and discussed since
8:
3877:Structure-Mapping vs. High-level Perception
3564:Moreland, J. P.; Craig, William L. (2003).
3158:The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology
2644:Power Practice: Analogies and Idioms, eBook
2592:
2590:
1923:The Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 taught:
1823:
1312:Some types of analogies can have a precise
792:The same notion of analogy was used in the
333:) made an analogy between the atom and the
71:Learn how and when to remove these messages
4092:Analogy in Patristic and Medieval Thought.
3893:. Nova Iorque: Routledge, p. 281-295.
2460:
2458:
2456:
2240:. Archived from the original on 2016-04-23
1736:Structure mapping, originally proposed by
1470:. Given two categories C and D, a functor
1000:drew heavily on analogies from other fish.
867:between two completely different objects.
774:, whether of mathematical nature or not.
4019:
3980:
3889:In: Tae-Hee Jo; Zdravka Todorova (Org.).
3762:
3698:Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought
3305:
3288:Gentner, Dedre; Hoyos, Christian (2017).
3103:
3014:
2893:
2827:
2817:
2768:
2758:
2408:
2372:. Pontifical University of the Holy Cross
1886:Learn how and when to remove this message
1634:. Analogous structures are the result of
1438:
1437:
1435:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1387:
1386:
1384:
1375:are isomorphic as vector spaces, but the
1361:
1360:
1358:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1329:
234:Learn how and when to remove this message
216:Learn how and when to remove this message
3903:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3802:Precedent and Analogy in Legal Reasoning
3718:Hummel, J.E., and Holyoak, K.J. (2005).
1075:by adding descriptive text and removing
874:
832:. This relation is not apparent in some
3875:Morrison, C., and Dietrich, E. (1995).
3711:Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P. (1997).
3696:Holyoak, K.J., and Thagard, P. (1995).
3166:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.001.0001
2161:
1986:In traditional Christian doctrine, the
1187:, formed on analogy with words such as
3742:Keane, M.T. Ledgeway; Duff, S (1994).
3526:Dictionary of Christianity and Science
3501:Dictionary of Christianity and Science
3425:
3414:
3389:
3378:
2873:Keane, M.T. Ledgeway; Duff, S (1994).
2250:
3938:International Philosophical Quarterly
3283:
3281:
3230:
3228:
3226:
3147:
3145:
3143:
3141:
3139:
3081:
3079:
3043:"Analogical Reasoning, Psychology of"
3036:
3034:
1479:
1213:; other analogous neologisms such as
1012:between source and target is used by
7:
2230:Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott,
1569:and Brayshaw (1988) developed their
600:identified analogy in works such as
385:Analogy plays a significant role in
154:adding citations to reliable sources
101:the article and/or by introducing a
4073:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
4064:"Medieval Theories of Analogy", by
4061:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
4053:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
3806:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
3738:, in Argumentation (2005) 19: 1–27.
3154:"Analogical Learning and Reasoning"
3086:Gentner, D.; Gunn, V. (June 2001).
2850:Doumas, Hummel, and Sandhofer, 2008
2391:Tabaczek, Mariusz (November 2018).
1480:structure mapping theory of analogy
1316:formulation through the concept of
1252:Analogy is also a term used in the
4089:Dictionary of the History of Ideas
4081:Dictionary of the History of Ideas
3568:. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.
2293:"Analogy as the Core of Cognition"
2205:"Analogy as the Core of Cognition"
25:
3846:Technical Communication Quarterly
3581:Cajetan, Tommaso De Vio, (1498),
3047:Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science
2495:"Qiyas: A Study in Islamic Logic"
2175:. Oxford University Press. 2018.
1825:Ubi eadem est ratio, ibi idem ius
908:, and sometimes they called them
844:, where the former is defined as
689:terms, the last being those like
52:This article has multiple issues.
3664:Analogy as the Core of Cognition
3610:Psychological Review, 115, 1-43.
3375:from the original on 2013-09-25.
2549:from the original on 2010-04-05.
2523:from the original on 2008-07-08.
1840:
1755:as the systematicity principle.
1423:{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}}
1346:{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}}
1048:
130:
82:
41:
4084:Analogy in Early Greek Thought.
3601:ACPI Encyclopedia of Philosophy
3599:Coelho, Ivo (2010). "Analogy."
2438:from the original on 2013-03-07
2274:, Online Etymology Dictionary.
1949:God is near to all who call him
1153:(simple past tense in English)
1108:An analogy can be stated using
887:is the source of an analogy to
635:Medieval lawyers distinguished
141:needs additional citations for
105:, or discuss this issue on the
60:or discuss these issues on the
3470:Fourth Lateran Council of 1215
2320:"Aristotle's Logic of Analogy"
1531:and reject those that do not.
1280:proof is not possible such as
950:. In their view analogy is an
946:argued that analogy is simply
544:, comparison, correspondence,
1:
2997:Gentner, Dedre (April 1983).
2688:Oxford Dictionaries | English
2009:used the analogy of a kiss:
846:the inner surface of the hand
737:, e.g., steely determination.
287:process of transferring some
3764:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90015-9
3700:. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press,
3685:. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press,
2895:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90015-9
2819:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002102
2760:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000858
2573:See Gentner et al. 2001 and
2318:Hesse, Mary (October 1965).
2070:jurisprudential epistemology
1640:shared an evolutionary line.
1445:{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }
1394:{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }
1368:{\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }
727:Analogy of proportionality (
305:biological notion of analogy
3585:, P.N. Zammit (ed.), 1934,
3294:Topics in Cognitive Science
3249:10.1007/978-3-030-35594-4_5
3049:, American Cancer Society,
2961:Morrison and Dietrich, 1995
2545:. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
2537:; Arun K. Majumdar (2003).
2324:The Philosophical Quarterly
2018:St. Bernard of Clairveaux,
1951:, or God as Trinity, where
1866:the claims made and adding
1571:Incremental Analogy Machine
1401:, have more structure than
948:a special case of induction
895:Greek philosophers such as
729:analogia proportionalitatis
677:made a distinction between
4145:
4030:10.1162/coli.2006.32.3.379
3817:Rhetoric Society Quarterly
3786:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.946
3652:Cambridge, MA, MIT Press,
3634:Forbus, K. et al. (1998).
3528:. Zondervan. p. 664.
3503:. Zondervan. p. 664.
3016:10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
2923:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.946
2798:PLOS Computational Biology
2739:PLOS Computational Biology
2575:Gentner's publication page
2476:Cleveland State Law Review
2057:
1784:
1729:
1599:
1495:
1489:
439:facial recognition systems
362:, itself derived from the
29:
4008:Computational Linguistics
3991:10.1007/s10994-005-0913-1
3909:The Journal of Philosophy
3858:10.1080/10572250701878876
3829:10.1080/02773940009391170
3354:10.1017/S0008197398003031
3342:The Cambridge Law Journal
3290:"Analogy and Abstraction"
3055:10.1002/0470018860.s00473
1229:, formed by analogy with
1207:, formed by analogy with
930:Special case of induction
850:the underside of the foot
2943:See Chalmers et al. 1991
2603:Verbal Tutor for the SAT
1732:Structure-mapping theory
1726:Structure mapping theory
1614:when they serve similar
1498:structure-mapping theory
1157:and the past participle
720:Analogy of attribution (
373:"upon, according to" +
32:Analogy (disambiguation)
4124:Philosophical arguments
3662:Hofstadter, D. (2001).
3549:Begbie, Jeremy (2000).
3041:Gentner, Dedre (2006),
2410:10.5840/forphil20182314
2232:A Greek-English Lexicon
2131:I know it when I see it
2076:(ostensiblist) school.
2050:but named analogously.
2020:Semons on Song of Songs
1982:Doctrine of the Trinity
1945:God is a consuming fire
1908:The Private Eye Project
1518:). Steven Phillips and
1512:artificial intelligence
1486:Artificial intelligence
1300:Another example is the
1256:school of thought as a
1077:less pertinent examples
3551:Hearing God in C Major
3424:Cite journal requires
3388:Cite journal requires
3092:Memory & Cognition
2601:. In Fogiel, M (ed.).
2539:"Analogical reasoning"
2086:Argumentum a contrario
2025:
1824:
1446:
1424:
1395:
1369:
1347:
1171:morphological leveling
1169:rule.) This is called
1133:An analogy can be the
1103:arguments from analogy
1040:Applications and types
1001:
892:
722:analogia attributionis
550:morphological homology
338:
278:A is to B as C is to D
3736:"Argument by Analogy"
3207:10.4324/9781315802725
2447:, Michael A. Martin,
2291:Hofstadter, Douglas.
2203:Hofstadter, Douglas.
2106:Commonsense reasoning
2091:Argumentum a fortiori
2058:Further information:
2007:Bernard of Clairveaux
1636:independent evolution
1622:related, such as the
1496:Further information:
1490:Further information:
1447:
1425:
1396:
1370:
1348:
995:
878:
566:cognitive linguistics
369:, "proportion", from
313:
4119:Conceptual modelling
4066:E. Jennifer Ashworth
3956:Ross, J.F., (1958),
3899:Ross, J.F., (1982),
3641:Gentner, D. (1983).
3587:The Analogy of Names
3524:Copan, Paul (2017).
3499:Copan, Paul (2017).
3201:. Psychology Press.
2136:Intuitive statistics
2096:Case-based reasoning
1492:case-based reasoning
1434:
1405:
1383:
1357:
1328:
860:Critique of Judgment
848:, and the latter as
742:Identity of relation
495:, and the very word
448:An analogy is not a
150:improve this article
30:For other uses, see
3950:10.5840/ipq19611356
3800:Lamond, G. (2006).
3713:The Analogical Mind
3583:De Nominum Analogia
2952:Forbus et al., 1998
2810:2011PLSCB...7E2102P
2751:2010PLSCB...6E0858P
2397:Forum Philosophicum
2111:Conceptual blending
1832:Teaching strategies
1715:Moral particularism
1682:conversation theory
1547:semantic similarity
1529:transform naturally
1243:for explaining the
1177:past tense form of
1073:improve the article
1018:conceptual blending
1014:conceptual metaphor
924:De Nominum Analogia
834:lexical definitions
758:) originally meant
578:classical antiquity
570:conceptual metaphor
381:Models and theories
252:In logic, it is an
103:disambiguation page
3901:Portraying Analogy
3734:Juthe, A. (2005).
3725:2021-10-11 at the
3628:10.1111/nbfr.12273
3307:10.1111/tops.12278
3105:10.3758/bf03200458
2580:2010-06-14 at the
2364:Strumia, Alberto.
2278:2010-03-24 at the
1851:possibly contains
1575:Empirical evidence
1442:
1420:
1391:
1365:
1343:
1002:
920:Portraying Analogy
916:James Francis Ross
893:
871:Shared abstraction
606:Nicomachean Ethics
339:
3751:Cognitive Science
3622:(1081): 346–359.
3535:978-0-310-49605-2
3510:978-0-310-49605-2
3258:978-3-030-35594-4
3216:978-1-315-80272-5
3064:978-0-470-01886-6
3003:Cognitive Science
2882:Cognitive Science
2654:978-1-59198-953-0
2612:978-0-87891-963-5
2493:Ruth Mas (1998).
2182:978-0-19-966128-2
1896:
1895:
1888:
1853:original research
1666:analogue computer
1660:For example, the
1649:Often a physical
1602:Analogy (biology)
1520:William H. Wilson
1094:
1093:
934:On the contrary,
586:cognitive science
507:ordinary language
427:conceptualization
353:derives from the
349:The English word
315:Ernest Rutherford
244:
243:
236:
226:
225:
218:
200:
124:
123:
75:
16:(Redirected from
4136:
4041:
4023:
4002:
3984:
3975:(1–3): 251–278.
3969:Machine Learning
3953:
3932:
3869:
3840:
3797:
3768:
3766:
3748:
3631:
3570:
3569:
3561:
3555:
3554:
3546:
3540:
3539:
3521:
3515:
3514:
3496:
3490:
3489:
3478:
3472:
3467:
3461:
3458:
3452:
3449:
3443:
3440:
3434:
3433:
3427:
3422:
3420:
3412:
3407:Mario Petrucci.
3404:
3398:
3397:
3391:
3386:
3384:
3376:
3367:Mario Petrucci.
3364:
3358:
3357:
3337:
3328:
3327:
3309:
3285:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3232:
3221:
3220:
3192:
3186:
3185:
3183:
3182:
3149:
3134:
3133:
3107:
3083:
3074:
3073:
3072:
3071:
3038:
3029:
3028:
3018:
2994:
2988:
2981:
2975:
2968:
2962:
2959:
2953:
2950:
2944:
2941:
2935:
2934:
2906:
2900:
2899:
2897:
2879:
2870:
2864:
2857:
2851:
2848:
2842:
2841:
2831:
2821:
2789:
2783:
2782:
2772:
2762:
2730:
2724:
2721:
2715:
2709:
2703:
2702:
2700:
2699:
2690:. Archived from
2680:
2674:
2673:
2671:
2669:
2638:
2632:
2631:
2629:
2627:
2594:
2585:
2571:
2565:
2558:
2552:
2550:
2531:
2525:
2524:
2522:
2502:Folia Orientalia
2499:
2490:
2484:
2483:
2471:
2465:
2462:
2451:
2446:
2444:
2443:
2428:
2422:
2421:
2419:
2417:
2412:
2388:
2382:
2381:
2379:
2377:
2361:
2355:
2354:
2352:
2350:
2315:
2309:
2308:
2306:
2304:
2288:
2282:
2269:
2263:
2262:
2256:
2248:
2246:
2245:
2227:
2221:
2220:
2218:
2216:
2200:
2194:
2193:
2191:
2189:
2166:
2023:
1992:Mystery of Faith
1891:
1884:
1880:
1877:
1871:
1868:inline citations
1844:
1843:
1836:
1827:
1630:and the legs of
1514:models, (called
1451:
1449:
1448:
1443:
1441:
1429:
1427:
1426:
1421:
1419:
1418:
1413:
1400:
1398:
1397:
1392:
1390:
1374:
1372:
1371:
1366:
1364:
1352:
1350:
1349:
1344:
1342:
1341:
1336:
1175:American English
1089:
1086:
1080:
1052:
1051:
1044:
1036:and similarity.
1026:computer science
988:Shared structure
968:is C, D, E, F, G
944:John Stuart Mill
568:, the notion of
540:The concepts of
450:figure of speech
239:
232:
221:
214:
210:
207:
201:
199:
158:
134:
126:
119:
116:
110:
86:
85:
78:
67:
45:
44:
37:
21:
4144:
4143:
4139:
4138:
4137:
4135:
4134:
4133:
4104:
4103:
4048:
4005:
3966:
3935:
3921:10.2307/2024008
3915:(20): 725–746.
3906:
3843:
3814:
3771:
3746:
3741:
3727:Wayback Machine
3616:New Blackfriars
3613:
3578:
3573:
3563:
3562:
3558:
3548:
3547:
3543:
3536:
3523:
3522:
3518:
3511:
3498:
3497:
3493:
3480:
3479:
3475:
3468:
3464:
3459:
3455:
3450:
3446:
3441:
3437:
3423:
3413:
3406:
3405:
3401:
3387:
3377:
3366:
3365:
3361:
3339:
3338:
3331:
3287:
3286:
3279:
3271:
3269:
3259:
3234:
3233:
3224:
3217:
3194:
3193:
3189:
3180:
3178:
3176:
3151:
3150:
3137:
3085:
3084:
3077:
3069:
3067:
3065:
3040:
3039:
3032:
2996:
2995:
2991:
2982:
2978:
2969:
2965:
2960:
2956:
2951:
2947:
2942:
2938:
2908:
2907:
2903:
2877:
2872:
2871:
2867:
2858:
2854:
2849:
2845:
2804:(8): e1002102.
2791:
2790:
2786:
2745:(7): e1000858.
2732:
2731:
2727:
2722:
2718:
2710:
2706:
2697:
2695:
2682:
2681:
2677:
2667:
2665:
2655:
2640:
2639:
2635:
2625:
2623:
2613:
2596:
2595:
2588:
2582:Wayback Machine
2572:
2568:
2559:
2555:
2533:
2532:
2528:
2520:
2497:
2492:
2491:
2487:
2473:
2472:
2468:
2463:
2454:
2441:
2439:
2430:
2429:
2425:
2415:
2413:
2390:
2389:
2385:
2375:
2373:
2363:
2362:
2358:
2348:
2346:
2336:10.2307/2218258
2330:(61): 328–340.
2317:
2316:
2312:
2302:
2300:
2290:
2289:
2285:
2280:Wayback Machine
2270:
2266:
2249:
2243:
2241:
2236:
2228:
2224:
2214:
2212:
2202:
2201:
2197:
2187:
2185:
2183:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2082:
2062:
2056:
2038:
2024:
2017:
1984:
1921:
1916:
1892:
1881:
1875:
1872:
1857:
1845:
1841:
1834:
1797:legal authority
1789:
1783:
1770:
1734:
1728:
1723:
1703:
1694:
1674:
1647:
1604:
1598:
1586:representations
1524:category theory
1500:
1494:
1488:
1464:Category theory
1432:
1431:
1408:
1403:
1402:
1381:
1380:
1377:complex numbers
1355:
1354:
1331:
1326:
1325:
1310:
1266:
1130:
1099:
1090:
1084:
1081:
1070:
1053:
1049:
1042:
990:
932:
873:
760:proportionality
744:
632:jurisprudence.
594:
483:. Phrases like
454:exemplification
435:face perception
391:decision making
387:problem solving
383:
347:
240:
229:
228:
227:
222:
211:
205:
202:
159:
157:
147:
135:
120:
114:
111:
96:
87:
83:
46:
42:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
4142:
4140:
4132:
4131:
4126:
4121:
4116:
4106:
4105:
4102:
4101:
4093:
4085:
4077:
4069:
4057:
4047:
4046:External links
4044:
4043:
4042:
4014:(3): 379–416.
4003:
3964:
3961:
3954:
3944:(3): 468–502.
3933:
3904:
3897:
3894:
3880:
3873:
3870:
3841:
3812:
3809:
3798:
3780:(4): 946–967.
3769:
3757:(3): 287–334.
3739:
3732:
3729:
3716:
3709:
3694:
3679:
3676:Boicho Kokinov
3660:
3646:
3639:
3632:
3611:
3604:
3597:
3590:
3577:
3574:
3572:
3571:
3556:
3541:
3534:
3516:
3509:
3491:
3473:
3462:
3453:
3444:
3435:
3426:|journal=
3399:
3390:|journal=
3359:
3348:(3): 481–521.
3329:
3300:(3): 672–693.
3277:
3257:
3222:
3215:
3187:
3174:
3135:
3098:(4): 565–577.
3075:
3063:
3030:
3009:(2): 155–170.
2989:
2976:
2963:
2954:
2945:
2936:
2917:(4): 946–967.
2901:
2888:(3): 387–438.
2865:
2852:
2843:
2784:
2725:
2716:
2704:
2675:
2653:
2633:
2611:
2599:"2. Analogies"
2586:
2566:
2553:
2526:
2485:
2466:
2452:
2423:
2383:
2356:
2310:
2283:
2264:
2222:
2195:
2181:
2160:
2158:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2148:
2143:
2138:
2133:
2128:
2126:Hypocatastasis
2123:
2118:
2113:
2108:
2103:
2098:
2093:
2088:
2081:
2078:
2055:
2052:
2047:analogia entis
2042:analogia fidei
2037:
2034:
2015:
1983:
1980:
1932:analogia entis
1920:
1917:
1915:
1912:
1894:
1893:
1848:
1846:
1839:
1833:
1830:
1785:Main article:
1782:
1779:
1769:
1766:
1752:
1751:
1748:
1745:
1730:Main article:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1702:
1699:
1693:
1690:
1673:
1670:
1646:
1643:
1620:evolutionarily
1597:
1594:
1555:neural network
1487:
1484:
1440:
1417:
1412:
1389:
1363:
1340:
1335:
1309:
1306:
1265:
1262:
1250:
1249:
1234:
1196:
1129:
1126:
1118:colon notation
1098:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1056:
1054:
1047:
1041:
1038:
989:
986:
985:
984:
983:is probably G.
978:
975:
969:
963:
931:
928:
872:
869:
824:, and between
743:
740:
739:
738:
732:
725:
711:
710:
709:
708:
705:Thomas Cajetan
702:
655:
648:
644:analogia iuris
638:analogia legis
633:
618:
608:
593:
590:
417:, prediction,
403:generalization
382:
379:
346:
343:
242:
241:
224:
223:
138:
136:
129:
122:
121:
90:
88:
81:
76:
50:
49:
47:
40:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4141:
4130:
4127:
4125:
4122:
4120:
4117:
4115:
4112:
4111:
4109:
4099:
4098:
4094:
4091:
4090:
4086:
4083:
4082:
4078:
4075:
4074:
4070:
4067:
4063:
4062:
4058:
4055:
4054:
4050:
4049:
4045:
4039:
4035:
4031:
4027:
4022:
4017:
4013:
4009:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3992:
3988:
3983:
3978:
3974:
3970:
3965:
3962:
3959:
3955:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3934:
3930:
3926:
3922:
3918:
3914:
3910:
3905:
3902:
3898:
3895:
3892:
3888:
3885:
3881:
3878:
3874:
3871:
3867:
3863:
3859:
3855:
3851:
3847:
3842:
3838:
3834:
3830:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3813:
3810:
3807:
3803:
3799:
3795:
3791:
3787:
3783:
3779:
3775:
3770:
3765:
3760:
3756:
3752:
3745:
3740:
3737:
3733:
3730:
3728:
3724:
3721:
3717:
3714:
3710:
3707:
3706:0-262-58144-2
3703:
3699:
3695:
3692:
3691:0-262-58096-9
3688:
3684:
3680:
3677:
3673:
3672:Keith Holyoak
3669:
3668:Dedre Gentner
3665:
3661:
3659:
3658:0-262-57139-0
3655:
3651:
3647:
3644:
3640:
3637:
3633:
3629:
3625:
3621:
3617:
3612:
3609:
3605:
3602:
3598:
3595:
3591:
3588:
3584:
3580:
3579:
3575:
3567:
3560:
3557:
3552:
3545:
3542:
3537:
3531:
3527:
3520:
3517:
3512:
3506:
3502:
3495:
3492:
3488:. Vatican.va.
3487:
3485:
3477:
3474:
3471:
3466:
3463:
3457:
3454:
3448:
3445:
3439:
3436:
3431:
3418:
3410:
3403:
3400:
3395:
3382:
3374:
3370:
3363:
3360:
3355:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3336:
3334:
3330:
3325:
3321:
3317:
3313:
3308:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3291:
3284:
3282:
3278:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3254:
3250:
3246:
3242:
3238:
3231:
3229:
3227:
3223:
3218:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3200:
3199:
3198:Mental Models
3191:
3188:
3177:
3175:9780195376746
3171:
3167:
3163:
3159:
3155:
3148:
3146:
3144:
3142:
3140:
3136:
3131:
3127:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3106:
3101:
3097:
3093:
3089:
3082:
3080:
3076:
3066:
3060:
3056:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3037:
3035:
3031:
3026:
3022:
3017:
3012:
3008:
3004:
3000:
2993:
2990:
2987:
2980:
2977:
2974:
2967:
2964:
2958:
2955:
2949:
2946:
2940:
2937:
2932:
2928:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2912:
2905:
2902:
2896:
2891:
2887:
2883:
2876:
2869:
2866:
2862:
2861:D. H. Sleeman
2856:
2853:
2847:
2844:
2839:
2835:
2830:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2811:
2807:
2803:
2799:
2795:
2788:
2785:
2780:
2776:
2771:
2766:
2761:
2756:
2752:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2729:
2726:
2720:
2717:
2714:
2708:
2705:
2694:on 2016-08-16
2693:
2689:
2685:
2679:
2676:
2664:
2660:
2656:
2650:
2646:
2645:
2637:
2634:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2593:
2591:
2587:
2583:
2579:
2576:
2570:
2567:
2563:
2562:Dedre Gentner
2557:
2554:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2530:
2527:
2519:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2496:
2489:
2486:
2481:
2477:
2470:
2467:
2461:
2459:
2457:
2453:
2450:
2437:
2433:
2427:
2424:
2411:
2406:
2403:(1): 95–132.
2402:
2398:
2394:
2387:
2384:
2371:
2367:
2360:
2357:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2314:
2311:
2298:
2294:
2287:
2284:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2268:
2265:
2260:
2254:
2239:
2235:
2233:
2226:
2223:
2210:
2206:
2199:
2196:
2184:
2178:
2174:
2173:
2165:
2162:
2156:
2152:
2149:
2147:
2144:
2142:
2139:
2137:
2134:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2122:
2121:False analogy
2119:
2117:
2114:
2112:
2109:
2107:
2104:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2084:
2083:
2079:
2077:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2061:
2053:
2051:
2049:
2048:
2043:
2036:Protestantism
2035:
2033:
2029:
2021:
2014:
2010:
2008:
2004:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1989:
1981:
1979:
1976:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1933:
1927:
1926:
1918:
1913:
1911:
1909:
1904:
1900:
1890:
1887:
1879:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1855:
1854:
1849:This section
1847:
1838:
1837:
1831:
1829:
1826:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1808:
1806:
1802:
1801:statutory law
1798:
1794:
1788:
1787:Analogy (law)
1780:
1778:
1774:
1767:
1765:
1762:
1756:
1749:
1746:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1739:
1738:Dedre Gentner
1733:
1725:
1720:
1718:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1700:
1698:
1691:
1689:
1687:
1683:
1679:
1671:
1669:
1667:
1663:
1658:
1656:
1652:
1644:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1603:
1595:
1593:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1578:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1561:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1535:Keith Holyoak
1532:
1530:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1516:systematicity
1513:
1508:
1505:
1499:
1493:
1485:
1483:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1459:
1456:as well as a
1455:
1415:
1378:
1338:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1307:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1293:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1269:
1263:
1261:
1259:
1255:
1254:Neogrammarian
1246:
1242:
1241:
1235:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1218:
1217:
1212:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1200:
1197:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1149:once had the
1148:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1104:
1096:
1088:
1078:
1074:
1068:
1066:
1062:
1057:This section
1055:
1046:
1045:
1039:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1006:extensionally
999:
994:
987:
982:
979:
976:
974:is C, D, E, F
973:
970:
967:
964:
961:
960:
959:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
940:Francis Bacon
937:
929:
927:
925:
921:
917:
913:
911:
907:
902:
898:
890:
886:
882:
877:
870:
868:
866:
862:
861:
857:
853:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
790:
788:
784:
780:
775:
773:
772:ordered pairs
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
741:
736:
733:
730:
726:
723:
719:
718:
717:
715:
706:
703:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:
672:
670:
666:
663:
660:
656:
653:
649:
646:
645:
640:
639:
634:
631:
627:
623:
622:Islamic logic
619:
616:
612:
609:
607:
603:
599:
596:
595:
591:
589:
587:
583:
579:
574:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
499:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
446:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:communication
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
395:argumentation
392:
389:, as well as
388:
380:
378:
376:
372:
368:
365:
361:
360:
356:
352:
344:
342:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
248:
238:
235:
220:
217:
209:
198:
195:
191:
188:
184:
181:
177:
174:
170:
167: –
166:
162:
161:Find sources:
155:
151:
145:
144:
139:This article
137:
133:
128:
127:
118:
108:
104:
100:
94:
91:This article
89:
80:
79:
74:
72:
65:
64:
59:
58:
53:
48:
39:
38:
33:
19:
4095:
4087:
4079:
4072:
4060:
4052:
4011:
4007:
3972:
3968:
3957:
3941:
3937:
3912:
3908:
3900:
3890:
3886:
3849:
3845:
3820:
3816:
3777:
3773:
3754:
3750:
3619:
3615:
3586:
3582:
3565:
3559:
3550:
3544:
3525:
3519:
3500:
3494:
3483:
3476:
3465:
3456:
3447:
3438:
3417:cite journal
3402:
3381:cite journal
3362:
3345:
3341:
3297:
3293:
3270:, retrieved
3240:
3197:
3190:
3179:. Retrieved
3157:
3095:
3091:
3068:, retrieved
3046:
3006:
3002:
2992:
2979:
2966:
2957:
2948:
2939:
2914:
2910:
2904:
2885:
2881:
2868:
2855:
2846:
2801:
2797:
2787:
2742:
2738:
2728:
2719:
2707:
2696:. Retrieved
2692:the original
2687:
2678:
2666:. Retrieved
2643:
2636:
2624:. Retrieved
2602:
2569:
2556:
2542:
2535:John F. Sowa
2529:
2505:
2501:
2488:
2479:
2475:
2469:
2464:Shelley 2003
2448:
2440:. Retrieved
2426:
2414:. Retrieved
2400:
2396:
2386:
2374:. Retrieved
2369:
2359:
2347:. Retrieved
2327:
2323:
2313:
2301:. Retrieved
2296:
2286:
2267:
2242:. Retrieved
2231:
2225:
2213:. Retrieved
2208:
2198:
2186:. Retrieved
2171:
2164:
2063:
2045:
2039:
2030:
2026:
2019:
2012:
2000:
1997:
1985:
1977:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1936:
1930:
1928:
1924:
1922:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1882:
1873:
1850:
1809:
1799:, including
1790:
1775:
1771:
1757:
1753:
1735:
1704:
1695:
1675:
1659:
1655:wind tunnels
1648:
1618:but are not
1611:
1605:
1579:
1570:
1565:
1559:
1539:Paul Thagard
1533:
1515:
1509:
1501:
1475:
1471:
1462:
1458:vector space
1314:mathematical
1311:
1302:analogue ear
1294:
1270:
1267:
1251:
1239:
1230:
1226:
1220:
1214:
1208:
1202:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1178:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1144:
1122:
1113:
1109:
1107:
1100:
1082:
1071:Please help
1059:may contain
1058:
1003:
980:
971:
965:
947:
936:Ibn Taymiyya
933:
923:
919:
914:
909:
894:
858:
854:
849:
845:
841:
837:
829:
825:
821:
817:
813:
806:Aristotelian
801:
791:
787:relationship
786:
782:
777:Analogy and
776:
767:
755:
751:
745:
728:
721:
712:
690:
686:
682:
678:
647:(see below).
642:
636:
614:
575:
554:homomorphism
546:mathematical
539:
511:common sense
496:
492:
489:and the like
488:
484:
477:
447:
384:
374:
370:
366:
357:
350:
348:
340:
335:Solar System
303:, as in the
282:
277:
251:
246:
245:
230:
212:
203:
193:
186:
179:
172:
160:
148:Please help
143:verification
140:
112:
92:
68:
61:
55:
54:Please help
51:
3852:(2): 1–19.
2723:Turney 2006
2564:et al. 2001
2551:, pp. 16–36
2508:: 113–128.
2169:"Analogy".
2151:Sensemaking
1941:God is Love
1919:Catholicism
1684:asserts an
1672:Cybernetics
1645:Engineering
1628:vertebrates
1551:isomorphism
1318:isomorphism
1308:Mathematics
1238:generative
1128:Linguistics
904:be used as
879:In several
779:abstraction
746:In ancient
652:Middle Ages
602:Metaphysics
592:Development
562:isomorphism
542:association
458:comparisons
423:explanation
289:information
4108:Categories
4021:cs/0608100
3982:cs/0508103
3576:References
3272:2020-12-09
3181:2020-12-09
3070:2020-12-09
2698:2017-04-07
2668:25 January
2626:25 January
2442:2012-12-10
2244:2018-05-21
2003:Cistercian
1975:language.
1876:April 2023
1860:improve it
1816:common law
1721:Psychology
1600:See also:
1582:perception
1567:Mark Keane
1286:philosophy
1245:productive
1227:underwhelm
1222:vapourware
1199:Neologisms
1135:linguistic
1085:April 2023
1065:irrelevant
1030:psychology
1022:psychology
998:coelacanth
977:Conclusion
942:and later
687:analogical
662:scholastic
535:humanities
527:philosophy
470:allegories
443:Hofstadter
411:creativity
399:perception
377:"ratio" .
331:Niels Bohr
301:similarity
297:linguistic
176:newspapers
115:April 2023
57:improve it
4129:Semantics
3837:145500740
3823:: 69–92.
3316:1756-8765
3267:213450124
3114:0090-502X
2663:232131611
2514:0015-5675
2482:: 79–96 .
2366:"Analogy"
2116:Duck test
2101:Casuistry
2001:Medieval
1864:verifying
1820:precedent
1812:civil law
1711:impartial
1651:prototype
1616:functions
1612:analogous
1560:identical
1543:coherence
1322:bijection
1290:cosmology
1278:empirical
1258:catch-all
1231:overwhelm
1151:preterite
1061:excessive
952:inductive
910:analogies
906:arguments
901:Aristotle
768:proportio
750:the word
679:equivocal
659:Christian
598:Aristotle
558:iconicity
485:and so on
462:metaphors
415:invention
345:Etymology
285:cognitive
270:abduction
266:induction
262:deduction
254:inference
206:June 2023
165:"Analogy"
107:talk page
99:splitting
63:talk page
18:Analogous
3866:32910655
3723:Archived
3553:. Baker.
3373:Archived
3324:28621480
3122:11504005
2838:21857816
2779:20661306
2621:32747316
2578:Archived
2547:Archived
2518:Archived
2436:Archived
2276:Archived
2253:cite web
2141:Metaphor
2080:See also
2066:madhhabs
2016:—
1973:negative
1965:distance
1914:Religion
1805:case law
1768:Children
1707:morality
1701:Morality
1468:functors
1282:theology
1216:firmware
1210:hardware
1204:software
1067:examples
1034:metaphor
962:Premises
956:probable
881:cultures
865:relation
756:analogia
752:αναλογια
735:Metaphor
699:homonymy
695:polysemy
683:univocal
665:theology
628:law and
615:analogia
533:and the
515:proverbs
481:metonymy
474:parables
367:ἀναλογία
359:analogia
327:modified
274:premises
258:argument
4114:Analogy
4038:2468783
3999:9322367
3929:2024008
3794:9231438
3130:1745309
3025:5371492
2931:9231438
2829:3154512
2806:Bibcode
2770:2908697
2747:Bibcode
2416:11 June
2376:11 June
2349:11 June
2344:2218258
2303:13 June
2272:analogy
2215:13 June
2188:11 June
2146:Parable
2074:dhahiri
1988:Trinity
1858:Please
1810:In the
1692:History
1686:analogy
1680:in his
1632:insects
1608:anatomy
1596:Anatomy
1590:stimuli
1274:logical
1264:Science
1139:English
1010:mapping
810:English
796:-based
714:Cajetan
691:healthy
675:Aquinas
582:lawyers
523:science
513:(where
503:message
466:similes
419:emotion
351:analogy
321:of the
293:meaning
247:Analogy
190:scholar
4036:
3997:
3927:
3864:
3835:
3792:
3704:
3689:
3674:, and
3656:
3532:
3507:
3486:, 237"
3322:
3314:
3265:
3255:
3213:
3172:
3128:
3120:
3112:
3061:
3023:
2929:
2836:
2826:
2777:
2767:
2661:
2651:
2619:
2609:
2512:
2342:
2179:
1969:number
1937:God is
1662:MONIAC
1430:does:
1163:helped
1159:holpen
883:, the
856:Kant's
626:sharia
519:idioms
476:, but
472:, and
407:memory
268:, and
256:or an
192:
185:
178:
171:
163:
4034:S2CID
4016:arXiv
3995:S2CID
3977:arXiv
3925:JSTOR
3862:S2CID
3833:S2CID
3804:, in
3747:(PDF)
3666:, in
3263:S2CID
3126:S2CID
3021:S2CID
2878:(PDF)
2521:(PDF)
2498:(PDF)
2340:JSTOR
2299:. MIT
2211:. MIT
2157:Notes
2060:Qiyas
2054:Islam
2005:monk
1990:is a
1953:being
1454:field
1452:is a
1240:rules
1193:drove
1189:drive
1110:is to
1097:Logic
897:Plato
764:Latin
748:Greek
611:Roman
493:as if
375:logos
364:Greek
355:Latin
319:model
197:JSTOR
183:books
3790:PMID
3702:ISBN
3687:ISBN
3654:ISBN
3530:ISBN
3505:ISBN
3430:help
3394:help
3320:PMID
3312:ISSN
3253:ISBN
3211:ISBN
3170:ISBN
3118:PMID
3110:ISSN
3059:ISBN
2927:PMID
2834:PMID
2775:PMID
2670:2018
2659:OCLC
2649:ISBN
2628:2018
2617:OCLC
2607:ISBN
2560:See
2510:ISSN
2418:2023
2378:2023
2351:2023
2305:2023
2259:link
2217:2023
2190:2023
2177:ISBN
1961:fire
1957:love
1803:and
1678:Pask
1664:(an
1624:legs
1537:and
1522:use
1353:and
1219:and
1185:dove
1180:dive
1155:holp
1146:help
1142:verb
1112:and
1024:and
1016:and
899:and
842:sole
840:and
838:palm
830:sole
828:and
826:foot
822:palm
820:and
818:hand
814:sole
802:what
697:and
685:and
650:The
641:and
630:fiqh
604:and
548:and
517:and
509:and
498:like
437:and
429:and
371:ana-
323:atom
169:news
4026:doi
3987:doi
3946:doi
3917:doi
3854:doi
3825:doi
3782:doi
3778:123
3759:doi
3624:doi
3484:CCC
3350:doi
3302:doi
3245:doi
3203:doi
3162:doi
3100:doi
3051:doi
3011:doi
2986:pdf
2973:pdf
2919:doi
2890:doi
2824:PMC
2814:doi
2765:PMC
2755:doi
2405:doi
2332:doi
1862:by
1807:.
1793:law
1791:In
1781:Law
1626:of
1606:In
1504:SAT
1288:or
1276:or
1063:or
918:in
889:God
885:Sun
852:.
836:of
798:SAT
783:all
766:as
701:).
669:God
657:In
620:In
537:.
531:law
478:not
329:by
317:'s
291:or
152:by
4110::
4032:.
4024:.
4012:32
4010:.
3993:.
3985:.
3973:60
3971:.
3940:.
3923:.
3913:67
3911:.
3887:.
3860:.
3850:17
3848:.
3831:.
3821:30
3819:.
3788:.
3776:.
3755:18
3753:.
3749:.
3670:,
3620:99
3618:.
3421::
3419:}}
3415:{{
3385::
3383:}}
3379:{{
3371:.
3346:57
3344:.
3332:^
3318:.
3310:.
3296:.
3292:.
3280:^
3261:,
3251:,
3239:,
3225:^
3209:.
3168:.
3160:.
3156:.
3138:^
3124:.
3116:.
3108:.
3096:29
3094:.
3090:.
3078:^
3057:,
3045:,
3033:^
3019:.
3005:.
3001:.
2925:.
2915:23
2913:.
2886:18
2884:.
2880:.
2832:.
2822:.
2812:.
2800:.
2796:.
2773:.
2763:.
2753:.
2741:.
2737:.
2686:.
2657:.
2615:.
2589:^
2541:.
2516:.
2506:34
2504:.
2500:.
2480:34
2478:.
2455:^
2434:.
2401:23
2399:.
2395:.
2368:.
2338:.
2328:15
2326:.
2322:.
2295:.
2255:}}
2251:{{
2207:.
1967:,
1963:,
1959:,
1955:,
1947:,
1943:,
1939:,
1460:.
1379:,
1284:,
1191::
1183::
1167:ed
1114:as
1105:.
938:,
794:US
681:,
671:.
617:.
588:.
560:,
556:,
552:,
529:,
525:,
491:,
487:,
468:,
464:,
460:,
456:,
441:.
425:,
421:,
413:,
409:,
405:,
401:,
397:,
393:,
307:.
280:.
264:,
66:.
4100:.
4068:.
4040:.
4028::
4018::
4001:.
3989::
3979::
3952:.
3948::
3942:1
3931:.
3919::
3879:.
3868:.
3856::
3839:.
3827::
3808:.
3796:.
3784::
3767:.
3761::
3715:.
3708:.
3693:.
3638:.
3630:.
3626::
3596:.
3538:.
3513:.
3482:"
3432:)
3428:(
3411:.
3396:)
3392:(
3356:.
3352::
3326:.
3304::
3298:9
3247::
3219:.
3205::
3184:.
3164::
3132:.
3102::
3053::
3027:.
3013::
3007:7
2933:.
2921::
2898:.
2892::
2840:.
2816::
2808::
2802:7
2781:.
2757::
2749::
2743:6
2701:.
2672:.
2630:.
2584:.
2445:.
2420:.
2407::
2380:.
2353:.
2334::
2307:.
2261:)
2247:.
2219:.
2192:.
1889:)
1883:(
1878:)
1874:(
1856:.
1476:f
1472:f
1439:C
1416:2
1411:R
1388:C
1362:C
1339:2
1334:R
1233:.
1195:.
1087:)
1083:(
1079:.
1069:.
981:b
972:b
966:a
891:.
754:(
337:.
325:(
237:)
231:(
219:)
213:(
208:)
204:(
194:·
187:·
180:·
173:·
146:.
117:)
113:(
109:.
95:.
73:)
69:(
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
