364:
no legally valid decision (that is, the purported decision is legally a nullity) there is no "decision" to which an ouster clause can apply. The Lords found the purported decision to be invalid (a nullity), because the tribunal had misconstrued the term "successor in title". Since the tribunal's determination that
Anisminic did not qualify for compensation was null, Anisminic were entitled to a share of the compensation paid by the Egyptian government.
1644:
144:
1658:
36:
378:
325:. c. 12) to distribute compensation paid by the Egyptian government to the UK government with respect to British properties it had nationalised. Anisminic claimed that they were eligible for compensation under the Orders, and the claim was determined by a tribunal (the respondents in this case) set up under the Foreign Compensation Act.
434:
The decision illustrates the courts' reluctance to give effect to any legislative provision that attempts to exclude their jurisdiction in judicial review. Even when such an exclusion is relatively clearly worded, the courts will hold that it does not preclude them from scrutinising the decision on
363:
By a 3–2 majority, the House of Lords decided that section 4(4) of the
Foreign Compensation Act did not preclude a court from reviewing the tribunal's decision. It said that a court is always able to inquire whether there has actually been a "decision", meaning a legally valid decision. If there is
350:
There were two important issues. The first was whether the tribunal had made an error of law when construing the term "successor in title". The second issue, which had important implications for the law on judicial review, was whether a court's jurisdiction to review a tribunal's decision could be
355:" in the relevant legislation even if the tribunal had made an error of law. Such a clause was section 4(4) of the Foreign Compensation Act: "The determination by the commission of any application made to them under this Act shall not be called into question in any court of law."
53:
328:
The tribunal decided that
Anisminic were not eligible for compensation, because TEDO, their "successors in title", did not have British nationality, as required by the Orders.
310:
government before
November 1956. Anisminic then sold the mining properties to The Economic Development Organisation (TEDO), owned by the Egyptian government, in 1957.
1718:
1708:
100:
72:
79:
1703:
1625:
86:
68:
1051:
609:
508:
421:
119:
388:
1165:
1034:
1620:
967:
868:
1127:
761:
272:
230:
93:
57:
1713:
480:
1287:
766:
218:
1282:
206:
403:
1257:
756:
318:
256:
399:
46:
1340:
1698:
1135:
1117:
260:
786:
1510:
1297:
771:
17:
1565:
1550:
340:
267:
made by a public body will make its decision a nullity and that a statutory exclusion clause (known as an
202:
1669:
1262:
940:
751:
336:
252:
1390:
736:
1545:
685:
602:
1360:
1019:
873:
858:
836:
580:
560:
513:
503:
302:
some mining properties of the appellant
Anisminic (renamed from Sinai Mining Co.) located in the
1345:
1267:
1105:
848:
843:
796:
721:
715:
555:
473:
438:
It also establishes that any error of law by a public body will result in its decision being
1350:
1317:
816:
680:
675:
640:
314:
214:
1599:
1572:
1560:
1540:
1474:
1469:
1452:
1432:
1427:
1407:
1272:
1252:
1247:
1150:
1110:
821:
746:
670:
655:
575:
344:
332:
303:
1676:
1484:
1402:
991:
957:
908:
893:
665:
570:
550:
540:
154:
143:
1692:
1530:
1489:
1375:
1355:
1327:
1277:
1242:
1216:
1211:
1204:
1155:
1095:
935:
925:
883:
806:
801:
731:
690:
614:
352:
268:
234:
1662:
1412:
1380:
1335:
1073:
1068:
1039:
952:
930:
898:
831:
811:
705:
645:
635:
587:
545:
523:
466:
264:
238:
453:
187:
1643:
1584:
1525:
1515:
1312:
1307:
1145:
1046:
962:
921:
888:
853:
776:
700:
650:
565:
440:
299:
210:
35:
1648:
1577:
1457:
1395:
1140:
1061:
1056:
1014:
996:
984:
945:
791:
781:
741:
726:
710:
660:
597:
592:
287:
286:, foreclose the ability judicial review, and is mirrored in numerous cases in
1555:
1520:
1462:
1437:
1302:
1199:
1187:
1172:
1160:
1088:
1006:
979:
863:
322:
1604:
1589:
1292:
1177:
974:
518:
279:
1494:
1442:
1422:
1370:
1182:
1100:
916:
878:
826:
454:
Anisminic v
Foreign Compensation Commission – full text of the decision
1594:
1447:
1192:
1083:
1078:
1024:
695:
406:. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed.
1535:
1479:
1385:
1226:
1029:
528:
307:
1417:
1365:
1221:
619:
535:
462:
489:
371:
29:
335:
of the tribunal's decision. Anisminic were successful in the
435:
an error of law and quashing it when such an error occurs.
278:
The case is seen as emblematic for and has fostered a wide
395:
271:) does not deprive the courts of their jurisdiction in
458:
1613:
1503:
1326:
1235:
1126:
1005:
907:
628:
496:
224:
198:
193:
183:
175:
160:
150:
136:
60:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
282:on the possibility of a government to ultimately,
347:; Anisminic then appealed to the House of Lords.
69:"Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission"
248:Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
137:Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission
474:
8:
275:unless it expressly states this intention.
18:Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission
481:
467:
459:
142:
133:
422:Learn how and when to remove this message
343:), but this decision was reversed by the
120:Learn how and when to remove this message
1626:History of the American legal profession
1719:United Kingdom constitutional case law
1709:United Kingdom administrative case law
7:
58:adding citations to reliable sources
25:
610:Restitution and unjust enrichment
1657:
1656:
1642:
376:
255:case from the House of Lords in
34:
1704:1968 in United Kingdom case law
1621:History of the legal profession
45:needs additional citations for
1:
319:Foreign Compensation Act 1950
306:peninsula were seized by the
402:the claims made and adding
207:Lord Morris of Borth-y-Gest
1735:
1288:International legal theory
767:International slavery laws
762:International human rights
757:International criminal law
257:English administrative law
164:17 December 1968
27:UK constitutional law case
1636:
1341:Administration of justice
263:", which states that any
229:
141:
1118:Basic structure doctrine
968:Natural and legal rights
849:Public international law
261:collateral fact doctrine
1298:Principle of typicality
772:International trade law
259:. It established the "
1293:Principle of legality
1052:Delegated legislation
752:Intellectual property
253:UK constitutional law
1714:House of Lords cases
1511:Barristers' chambers
1453:Legal representation
1391:Justice of the peace
737:Financial regulation
317:were made under the
179:2 AC 147, 2 WLR 163
54:improve this article
1546:Election commission
1258:Expressive function
787:Landlord–tenant law
686:Consumer protection
298:As a result of the
1504:Legal institutions
1371:Lawsuit/Litigation
1361:Dispute resolution
1166:Catholic canon law
874:State of emergency
837:Will and testament
561:Law of obligations
514:Constitutional law
504:Administrative law
387:possibly contains
313:In 1959 and 1962,
1686:
1685:
1346:Constitutionalism
1268:Law and economics
1106:Act of parliament
844:Product liability
797:Legal archaeology
722:Environmental law
716:Entertainment law
556:International law
432:
431:
424:
389:original research
331:Anisminic sought
315:Orders in Council
244:
243:
188:BAILII Transcript
130:
129:
122:
104:
16:(Redirected from
1726:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1647:
1646:
1470:Question of fact
1351:Criminal justice
681:Construction law
676:Conflict of laws
641:Agricultural law
483:
476:
469:
460:
427:
420:
416:
413:
407:
404:inline citations
380:
379:
372:
351:excluded by an "
215:Lord Wilberforce
194:Court membership
171:
169:
146:
134:
125:
118:
114:
111:
105:
103:
62:
38:
30:
21:
1734:
1733:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1699:1968 in England
1689:
1688:
1687:
1682:
1655:
1641:
1632:
1609:
1600:Political party
1573:Legal education
1561:Law enforcement
1541:Court of equity
1499:
1475:Question of law
1428:Practice of law
1408:Judicial review
1322:
1273:Legal formalism
1253:Comparative law
1248:Contract theory
1231:
1151:Legal pluralism
1122:
1111:Act of Congress
1035:Executive order
1001:
903:
822:Nationality law
747:Immigration law
671:Competition law
624:
492:
487:
450:
428:
417:
411:
408:
393:
381:
377:
370:
361:
345:Court of Appeal
333:judicial review
296:
273:judicial review
231:Judicial review
167:
165:
126:
115:
109:
106:
63:
61:
51:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1732:
1730:
1722:
1721:
1716:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1691:
1690:
1684:
1683:
1681:
1680:
1673:
1666:
1652:
1649:Law portal
1637:
1634:
1633:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1617:
1615:
1611:
1610:
1608:
1607:
1602:
1597:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1507:
1505:
1501:
1500:
1498:
1497:
1492:
1487:
1485:Trial advocacy
1482:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1460:
1455:
1450:
1445:
1440:
1435:
1425:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1393:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1332:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1305:
1300:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1239:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1230:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1190:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1132:
1130:
1124:
1123:
1121:
1120:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1108:
1103:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1081:
1076:
1071:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1059:
1054:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1022:
1017:
1015:Ballot measure
1011:
1009:
1003:
1002:
1000:
999:
994:
992:Legal treatise
989:
988:
987:
982:
972:
971:
970:
960:
958:Letters patent
955:
950:
949:
948:
938:
933:
928:
919:
913:
911:
909:Sources of law
905:
904:
902:
901:
896:
894:Unenforced law
891:
886:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
841:
840:
839:
834:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
774:
769:
764:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
724:
719:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
668:
666:Commercial law
663:
658:
653:
648:
643:
638:
632:
630:
626:
625:
623:
622:
617:
612:
607:
606:
605:
595:
590:
585:
584:
583:
578:
568:
563:
558:
553:
548:
543:
538:
533:
532:
531:
521:
516:
511:
506:
500:
498:
494:
493:
488:
486:
485:
478:
471:
463:
457:
456:
449:
448:External links
446:
430:
429:
384:
382:
375:
369:
366:
360:
357:
295:
292:
251:2 AC 147 is a
242:
241:
227:
226:
222:
221:
200:
199:Judges sitting
196:
195:
191:
190:
185:
181:
180:
177:
173:
172:
162:
158:
157:
155:House of Lords
152:
148:
147:
139:
138:
128:
127:
42:
40:
33:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1731:
1720:
1717:
1715:
1712:
1710:
1707:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1696:
1694:
1679:
1678:
1674:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1665:
1664:
1653:
1651:
1650:
1645:
1639:
1638:
1635:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1619:
1618:
1616:
1612:
1606:
1603:
1601:
1598:
1596:
1593:
1591:
1588:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1567:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1559:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1531:Civil society
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1508:
1506:
1502:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1490:Trier of fact
1488:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1478:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1464:
1461:
1459:
1456:
1454:
1451:
1449:
1446:
1444:
1441:
1439:
1436:
1434:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1426:
1424:
1421:
1419:
1416:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1404:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1376:Legal opinion
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1356:Court-martial
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1333:
1331:
1329:
1328:Jurisprudence
1325:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1301:
1299:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1238:
1234:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1217:Statutory law
1215:
1213:
1212:Socialist law
1210:
1206:
1205:Byzantine law
1203:
1202:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1186:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1167:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:Religious law
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1131:
1129:
1128:Legal systems
1125:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1109:
1107:
1104:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:Statutory law
1094:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1070:
1067:
1063:
1060:
1058:
1055:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1010:
1008:
1004:
998:
995:
993:
990:
986:
983:
981:
978:
977:
976:
973:
969:
966:
965:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
947:
944:
943:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
926:Statutory law
923:
920:
918:
915:
914:
912:
910:
906:
900:
897:
895:
892:
890:
887:
885:
884:Transport law
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
838:
835:
833:
830:
829:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
802:Legal fiction
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
768:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
732:Financial law
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
691:Corporate law
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
672:
669:
667:
664:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
637:
634:
633:
631:
627:
621:
618:
616:
615:Statutory law
613:
611:
608:
604:
601:
600:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
582:
579:
577:
574:
573:
572:
569:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
530:
527:
526:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
501:
499:
497:Core subjects
495:
491:
484:
479:
477:
472:
470:
465:
464:
461:
455:
452:
451:
447:
445:
443:
442:
436:
426:
423:
415:
405:
401:
397:
391:
390:
385:This section
383:
374:
373:
367:
365:
358:
356:
354:
353:ouster clause
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
311:
309:
305:
301:
293:
291:
289:
285:
281:
276:
274:
270:
269:ouster clause
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
249:
240:
236:
235:Ouster clause
232:
228:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
197:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
163:
159:
156:
153:
149:
145:
140:
135:
132:
124:
121:
113:
102:
99:
95:
92:
88:
85:
81:
78:
74:
71: –
70:
66:
65:Find sources:
59:
55:
49:
48:
43:This article
41:
37:
32:
31:
19:
1675:
1668:
1654:
1640:
1413:Jurisdiction
1381:Legal remedy
1336:Adjudication
1236:Legal theory
1074:Ratification
1069:Promulgation
1040:Proclamation
1020:Codification
953:Human rights
941:Divine right
931:Constitution
899:Women in law
817:Military law
812:Marriage law
807:Maritime law
706:Election law
646:Aviation law
636:Abortion law
588:Property law
524:Criminal law
439:
437:
433:
418:
409:
386:
368:Significance
362:
349:
330:
327:
312:
297:
290:countries.
283:
277:
265:error of law
247:
246:
245:
239:Error of law
219:Lord Pearson
131:
116:
107:
97:
90:
83:
76:
64:
52:Please help
47:verification
44:
1585:Legislature
1516:Bureaucracy
1313:Rule of man
1308:Rule of law
1283:Libertarian
1146:Chinese law
1047:Legislation
997:Regulations
985:Law reports
963:Natural law
859:Reparations
854:Refugee law
777:Jurimetrics
718:(Media law)
656:Banking law
651:Amnesty law
629:Disciplines
566:Private law
441:ultra vires
300:Suez Crisis
284:in any case
211:Lord Pearce
1693:Categories
1578:Law school
1458:Prosecutor
1396:Magistrate
1183:Jewish law
1141:Common law
1062:Rulemaking
1057:Regulation
1007:Law making
946:Divine law
922:Legal code
869:Sports law
792:Law of war
742:Health law
727:Family law
711:Energy law
661:Bankruptcy
598:Punishment
593:Public law
396:improve it
337:High Court
288:common law
184:Transcript
168:1968-12-17
80:newspapers
1556:Judiciary
1551:Executive
1526:The bench
1463:Solicitor
1438:Barrister
1318:Sociology
1303:Pseudolaw
1243:Anarchist
1200:Roman law
1188:Parsi law
1173:Hindu law
1161:Canon law
1136:Civil law
1089:Concordat
980:Precedent
889:Trust law
864:Space law
701:Drugs law
571:Procedure
509:Civil law
400:verifying
323:14 Geo. 6
203:Lord Reid
1663:Category
1605:Tribunal
1590:Military
1433:Attorney
1403:Judgment
1263:Feminist
1178:Jain law
975:Case law
696:Cyberlaw
603:Corporal
581:Criminal
551:Evidence
541:Doctrine
519:Contract
412:May 2022
359:Judgment
341:Browne J
308:Egyptian
280:case law
225:Keywords
176:Citation
110:May 2022
1677:Outline
1614:History
1521:The bar
1495:Verdict
1443:Counsel
1423:Justice
1278:History
1101:Statute
917:Charter
879:Tax law
827:Probate
394:Please
166: (
161:Decided
94:scholar
1595:Police
1566:Agency
1448:Lawyer
1193:Sharia
1084:Treaty
1079:Repeal
1025:Decree
936:Custom
832:Estate
782:Labour
546:Equity
96:
89:
82:
75:
67:
1670:Index
1536:Court
1480:Trial
1386:Judge
1227:Yassa
1030:Edict
576:Civil
529:Crime
304:Sinai
294:Facts
151:Court
101:JSTOR
87:books
1418:Jury
1366:Fiqh
1222:Xeer
620:Tort
536:Deed
73:news
490:Law
398:by
56:by
1695::
924:/
444:.
237:,
233:,
217:,
213:,
209:,
205:,
482:e
475:t
468:v
425:)
419:(
414:)
410:(
392:.
339:(
321:(
170:)
123:)
117:(
112:)
108:(
98:·
91:·
84:·
77:·
50:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
