Knowledge

Annualized failure rate

Source 📝

210:
AFR will increase towards and beyond the end of the service life of a device or component. Google's 2007 study found, based on a large field sample of drives, that actual AFRs for individual drives ranged from 1.7% for first year drives to over 8.6% for three-year-old drives. A CMU 2007 study showed
132:
for the full 8766 hours of a year, and gives the estimated fraction of an original sample of devices or components that will fail in one year, or, equivalently, 1 − AFR is the fraction of devices or components that will show no failures over a year. It is based on an exponential failure distribution
248: 191: 123: 266: 204:
drives may be an MTBF of 300,000 hours, giving an approximate theoretical 2.92% annualized failure rate i.e. a 2.92% chance that a given drive will fail during a year of use.
26:) gives the estimated probability that a device or component will fail during a full year of use. It is a relation between the mean time between failure ( 30:) and the hours that a number of devices are run per year. AFR is estimated from a sample of like components—AFR and MTBF as given by vendors are 367: 225: 146: 55: 280: 31: 207:
The AFR for a drive is derived from time-to-fail data from a reliability-demonstration test (RDT).
211:
an estimated 3% mean AFR over 1–5 years based on replacement logs for a large sample of drives.
260: 337: 345: 341: 43: 372: 317: 129: 361: 220: 197: 134: 27: 347:
Disk Failures in the Real World: What Does an MTTF of 1,000,000 Hours Mean to You?
298:
Estimating Drive Reliability in Desktop Computers and Consumer Electronics Systems
137:
for a full derivation). Note: Some manufacturers count a year as 8760 hours.
296: 34:
statistics that can not predict the behaviour of an individual unit.
16:
Probability that a device or component will fail during a year of use
249:"Diving into "MTBF" and "AFR": Storage Reliability Specs Explained" 201: 255:. Seagate. Apr 2010. Archived from the original on 2010-05-01. 42:
For example, AFR is used to characterize the reliability of
140:
This ratio can be approximated by, assuming a small AFR,
128:
This equation assumes that the device or component is
149: 58: 49:
The relationship between AFR and MTBF (in hours) is:
185: 117: 265:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 319:Failure Trends in Large Disk Drive Population 8: 282:Hard disk drive reliability and MTBF / AFR 243: 241: 162: 148: 95: 57: 196:For example, a common specification for 237: 258: 186:{\displaystyle AFR={8766 \over MTBF}} 118:{\displaystyle AFR=1-exp(-8766/MTBF)} 7: 14: 316:"AFR broken down by age groups", 112: 86: 1: 389: 226:Frequency of exceedance 20:Annualized failure rate 187: 119: 188: 120: 368:Engineering failures 147: 56: 325:, p. 4, figure 2ff 183: 115: 338:Schroeder, Bianca 253:Inside IT Storage 181: 380: 352: 350: 334: 328: 326: 324: 313: 307: 305: 303: 292: 286: 285: 277: 271: 270: 264: 256: 245: 192: 190: 189: 184: 182: 180: 163: 124: 122: 121: 116: 99: 44:hard disk drives 38:Hard disk drives 388: 387: 383: 382: 381: 379: 378: 377: 358: 357: 356: 355: 342:Gibson, Garth A 336: 335: 331: 322: 315: 314: 310: 301: 294: 293: 289: 279: 278: 274: 257: 247: 246: 239: 234: 217: 167: 145: 144: 54: 53: 40: 17: 12: 11: 5: 386: 384: 376: 375: 370: 360: 359: 354: 353: 329: 308: 287: 272: 236: 235: 233: 230: 229: 228: 223: 216: 213: 194: 193: 179: 176: 173: 170: 166: 161: 158: 155: 152: 126: 125: 114: 111: 108: 105: 102: 98: 94: 91: 88: 85: 82: 79: 76: 73: 70: 67: 64: 61: 39: 36: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 385: 374: 371: 369: 366: 365: 363: 349: 348: 343: 339: 333: 330: 321: 320: 312: 309: 300: 299: 295:Cole, Gerry, 291: 288: 284: 283: 276: 273: 268: 262: 254: 250: 244: 242: 238: 231: 227: 224: 222: 219: 218: 214: 212: 208: 205: 203: 199: 177: 174: 171: 168: 164: 159: 156: 153: 150: 143: 142: 141: 138: 136: 131: 109: 106: 103: 100: 96: 92: 89: 83: 80: 77: 74: 71: 68: 65: 62: 59: 52: 51: 50: 47: 45: 37: 35: 33: 29: 25: 21: 346: 332: 318: 311: 297: 290: 281: 275: 252: 221:Failure rate 209: 206: 195: 139: 135:failure rate 127: 48: 41: 23: 19: 18: 362:Categories 304:, Virginia 232:References 130:powered on 32:population 90:− 75:− 261:cite web 215:See also 373:Rates 323:(PDF) 302:(PDF) 133:(see 267:link 202:SATA 200:and 198:PATA 165:8766 93:8766 28:MTBF 24:AFR 364:: 344:, 340:; 263:}} 259:{{ 251:. 240:^ 46:. 351:. 327:. 306:. 269:) 178:F 175:B 172:T 169:M 160:= 157:R 154:F 151:A 113:) 110:F 107:B 104:T 101:M 97:/ 87:( 84:p 81:x 78:e 72:1 69:= 66:R 63:F 60:A 22:(

Index

MTBF
population
hard disk drives
powered on
failure rate
PATA
SATA
Failure rate
Frequency of exceedance


"Diving into "MTBF" and "AFR": Storage Reliability Specs Explained"
cite web
link
Hard disk drive reliability and MTBF / AFR
Estimating Drive Reliability in Desktop Computers and Consumer Electronics Systems
Failure Trends in Large Disk Drive Population
Schroeder, Bianca
Gibson, Garth A
Disk Failures in the Real World: What Does an MTTF of 1,000,000 Hours Mean to You?
Categories
Engineering failures
Rates

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.