55:
198:
activity would consider it to be an outcome failure if the core issue has not been resolved or a core need is not met. A process failure occurs, by contrast, when, although the activity is completed successfully, the customer still perceives the way in which the activity is conducted to be below an expected standard or benchmark.
364:
explains that a great deal can be learned from things going wrong unexpectedly, and that part of science's success comes from keeping blunders "small, manageable, constant, and trackable". He uses the example of engineers and programmers who push systems to their limits, breaking them to learn about
197:
researchers have distinguished between outcome and process failures. An outcome failure is a failure to obtain a good or service at all; a process failure is a failure to receive the good or service in an appropriate or preferable way. Thus, a person who is only interested in the final outcome of an
201:
Wan and Chan note that outcome and process failures are associated with different kinds of detrimental effects to the consumer. They observe that "n outcome failure involves a loss of economic resources (i.e., money, time) and a process failure involves a loss of social resources (i.e., social
151:
Most of the items listed below had high expectations, significant financial investments, and/or widespread publicity, but fell far short of success. Due to the subjective nature of "success" and "meeting expectations", there can be disagreement about what constitutes a "major flop".
92:. Similarly, the degree of success or failure in a situation may be differently viewed by distinct observers or participants, such that a situation that one considers to be a failure, another might consider to be a success, a qualified success or a neutral situation.
303:, but is not intentional. Accordingly, Smith suggests, we ought to understand failure as involving a situation in which it is reasonable to expect a person to do something, but they do not do it—regardless of whether they intend to do it or not.
619:, p. 17: This 'American sense' looked upon failure as 'a moral sieve' that trapped the loafer and passed the true man through. Such ideologies fixed blame squarely on individual faults, not extenuating circumstances …
84:. The criteria for failure depends on context, and may be relative to a particular observer or belief system. One person might consider a failure what another person considers a success, particularly in cases of direct
95:
It may also be difficult or impossible to ascertain whether a situation meets criteria for failure or success due to ambiguous or ill-defined definition of those criteria. Finding useful and effective criteria or
369:). Failure can also be used productively, for instance to find identify ambiguous cases that warrant further interpretation. When studying biases in machine learning, for instance, failure can be seen as a "
365:
them. Kelly also warns against creating a culture that punishes failure harshly, because this inhibits a creative process, and risks teaching people not to communicate important failures with others (e.g.,
288:
Both actions and omissions may be morally significant. The classic example of a morally significant omission is one's failure to rescue someone in dire need of assistance. It may seem that one is morally
336:. Alternatively, experiments can be regarded as failures when they do not provide helpful information about nature. However, the standards of what constitutes failure are not clear-cut. For example, the
255:
grade for failing (and adjusting the ranges corresponding to the other letters). The practice of letter grades spread more broadly in the first decades of the 20th century. By the 1930s, the letter
1151:
157:
216:
A failing grade is a mark or grade given to a student to indicate that they did not pass an assignment or a class. Grades may be given as numbers, letters or other symbols.
729:
112:
argues that the concept of failure underwent a metamorphosis in the United States over the course of the 19th century. Initially, Sandage notes, financial failure, or
299:
notes that there are two ways one can not do something: consciously or unconsciously. A conscious omission is intentional, whereas an unconscious omission may be
683:
Smith, Amy K.; Bolton, Ruth N.; Wagner, Janet (August 1999). "A Model of
Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery".
1141:
1287:
902:
875:
667:
640:
455:
to indicate contempt or displeasure, and the image that formerly accompanied the message that the site was overloaded is referred to as the "
227:
scale and then summarizing those numerical grades by assigning letter grades to numerical ranges. Mount
Holyoke assigned letter grades
1184:
1374:
323:
310:". In other words, a failure to act becomes morally significant when a norm demands that some action be taken, and it is not taken.
285:, omissions are distinguished from acts: acts involve an agent doing something; omissions involve an agent's not doing something.
946:"Algorithmic failure as a humanities methodology: Machine learning's mispredictions identify rich cases for qualitative analysis"
31:
337:
591:
54:
319:
1240:
685:
349:
1396:
340:
became the "most famous failed experiment in history" because it did not detect the motion of the Earth through the
306:
Randolph Clarke, commenting on Smith's work, suggests that "hat makes failure to act an omission is the applicable
1366:
918:
630:
1425:
1279:
332:
Scientific hypotheses can be said to fail when they lead to predictions that do not match the results found in
46:
116:, was understood as an event in a person's life: an occurrence, not a character trait. The notion of a person
1217:
859:
546:
35:
447:, launched in January 2008, featured photos and videos captioned with "fail" and its variations. The #fail
344:
as had been expected. This failure to confirm the presence of the aether would later provide support for
1307:
730:"Failure is Not Fatal: Actionable Insights on Service Failure and Recovery for the Hospitality Industry"
327:
220:
42:
1391:
469:
361:
211:
341:
278:
268:
867:
1340:
1332:
1146:
1086:
1037:
985:
710:
552:
540:
517:
248:
145:
121:
1057:"Digital failure: Unbecoming the "good" data subject through entropic, fugitive, and queer data"
427:
expressed derision and ridicule for mistakes deemed "eminently mockable". According to linguist
1370:
1324:
1293:
1283:
1078:
1029:
977:
898:
871:
798:
780:
741:
702:
663:
636:
475:
382:
307:
296:
892:
1420:
1316:
1305:
Smith, Patricia G. (1990). "Contemplating
Failure: The Importance of Unconscious Omission".
1212:
1174:
1068:
1019:
967:
957:
863:
788:
772:
694:
534:
499:
355:
183:
1004:
136:
connotations. By the late 19th century, to be a failure was to have a deficient character.
561:
345:
172:
167:
528:
1358:
793:
760:
522:
394:
386:
272:
179:
163:
120:
a failure, Sandage argues, is a relative historical novelty: "ot until the eve of the
1414:
1344:
1269:
1090:
1041:
989:
714:
555: – Ability of a structure to support a designed structural load without breaking
414:
390:
133:
109:
89:
583:
502: – Process of collecting and analyzing data to determine the cause of a failure
281:
tradition have suggested that failure is connected to the notion of an omission. In
1179:
511:
505:
433:
410:
366:
182:, with the initial lack of commercial success even lending a cachet of subcultural
30:
This article is about the social concept. For structural and systems failures, see
1273:
1105:
853:
657:
100:
to judge the success or failure of a situation may itself be a significant task.
290:
85:
776:
698:
1387:
1137:
1110:
1024:
962:
945:
531: – Adage typically stated as: "Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong"
456:
428:
333:
300:
224:
125:
113:
1328:
1297:
1082:
1073:
1056:
1033:
981:
784:
745:
706:
493:
443:
438:
194:
97:
1005:"The Thick Machine: Anthropological AI between explanation and explication"
802:
564: – Unanticipated interaction of multiple failures in a complex system
972:
481:
441:
message was translated into
English as "You fail it". The comedy website
17:
1336:
1320:
922:
452:
448:
373:
where pre-existing biases and structural flaws make themselves known".
251:
by 1890. In 1898, Mount
Holyoke adjusted the grading system, adding an
81:
282:
67:
1404:
1003:
Munk, Anders
Kristian; Olesen, Asger Gehrt; Jacomy, Mathieu (2022).
514: – Frequency with which an engineered system or component fails
1365:. New York: Basic Books, 1983. Paperback reprint, Princeton, N.J.:
1207:
239:
indicating lower than 75% performance and designating failure. The
132:". Accordingly, the notion of failure acquired both moralistic and
487:
472: – Sudden and total failure from which recovery is impossible
63:
53:
77:
632:
Cult Film as a Guide to Life: Fandom, Adaptation, and
Identity
59:
484: – Event resulting in major damage, destruction or death
76:
is the social concept of not meeting a desirable or intended
549: – A part whose failure will disrupt the entire system
1104:
Mikkelson, Barbara; Mikkelson, David P. (13 August 2007).
58:"Failing is not a crime but lack of effort is" – sign on
158:
list of commercial failures in computer and video gaming
148:
or company that does not reach expectations of success.
557:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
543: – Form of workplace bullying and no-win situation
223:
was evaluating students' performance on a 100-point or
393:
for the term to turn up the White House biography of
1363:
Normal
Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies
584:"Failure - Definition of failure by Merriam-Webster"
1241:"Joy in the failure of others has gone competitive"
656:Mathijs, Ernest; Sexton, Jamie (22 November 2019).
855:Omissions: Agency, Metaphysics, and Responsibility
259:was dropped from the system, for unclear reasons.
385:" was popularized as a result of a widely known "
761:"Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently)"
508: – Specific way in which a failure occurs
162:For company failures related to the 1997–2001
891:Blum, Edward K.; Lototsky, Sergey V. (2006).
178:Sometimes, commercial failures can receive a
8:
1275:Born Losers: A History of Failure in America
759:Schinske, Jeffrey; Tanner, Kimberly (2014).
431:, the most probable origin of this usage is
156:For flops in computer and video gaming, see
1132:
1130:
1128:
80:, and is usually viewed as the opposite of
41:"Fail" redirects here. For other uses, see
27:Not meeting a desired or intended objective
1392:"How Fail Went From Verb to Interjection"
1142:"How Fail Went From Verb to Interjection"
1072:
1023:
971:
961:
919:"THE WORLD QUESTION CENTER 2011 — Page 6"
868:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199347520.001.0001
792:
525: – Concept in public goods economics
728:Wan, Lisa; Chan, Elisa (20 March 2019).
616:
604:
575:
894:Mathematics of Physics and Engineering
659:The Routledge Companion to Cult Cinema
490: – Incorrect or inaccurate action
293:for failing to rescue in such a case.
1206:Beam, Christopher (15 October 2008).
839:
827:
815:
7:
1405:Association for the Study of Failure
1187:from the original on 4 December 2013
437:(1998), a Japanese video game whose
1220:from the original on 25 August 2009
1173:Schofield, Jack (17 October 2008).
1106:"Someone Set Us Up The Google Bomb"
537: – 1984 book by Charles Perrow
1154:from the original on 27 April 2017
629:Hunter, I. Q. (8 September 2016).
594:from the original on 16 July 2015.
496: – Design feature or practice
451:is used on the microblogging site
25:
405:During the early 2000s, the term
324:Sociology of scientific knowledge
1175:"All your FAIL are belong to us"
852:Clarke, Randolph (2 June 2014).
478: – Systemic risk of failure
124:did Americans commonly label an
32:Structural integrity and failure
1239:Malik, Asmaa (24 April 2010).
944:Rettberg, Jill Walker (2022).
320:Superseded theories in science
1:
686:Journal of Marketing Research
635:. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
1278:. Cambridge, Massachusetts:
765:CBE: Life Sciences Education
350:special theory of relativity
1397:The New York Times Magazine
338:Michelson–Morley experiment
1442:
1367:Princeton University Press
1055:Bridges, Lauren E (2021).
921:. Edge.org. Archived from
777:10.1187/cbe.CBE-14-03-0054
699:10.1177/002224379903600305
317:
266:
209:
144:A commercial failure is a
40:
29:
1025:10.1177/20539517211069891
963:10.1177/20539517221131290
734:Boston Hospitality Review
421:and the superlative form
401:Internet memes and "fail"
1280:Harvard University Press
1074:10.1177/2053951720977882
47:Failure (disambiguation)
860:Oxford University Press
547:Single point of failure
409:began to be used as an
36:Reliability engineering
1067:(1): 205395172097788.
1061:Big Data & Society
1018:(1): 205395172110698.
1012:Big Data & Society
956:(2): 205395172211312.
950:Big Data & Society
70:
1308:Philosophical Studies
693:(3): 356–372 at 358.
328:Philosophy of science
221:Mount Holyoke College
57:
43:Fail (disambiguation)
897:. World Scientific.
470:Catastrophic failure
277:Philosophers in the
212:Grading in education
588:merriam-webster.com
417:. The interjection
342:luminiferous aether
269:Criminal negligence
108:Cultural historian
1321:10.1007/BF00368204
1147:The New York Times
925:on 5 December 2013
842:, p. 162–163.
553:Structural failure
541:Setting up to fail
518:Governance failure
413:in the context of
371:cybernetic rupture
249:Harvard University
219:By the year 1884,
71:
1390:(7 August 2009),
1289:978-0-674-04305-3
1270:Sandage, Scott A.
1140:(7 August 2009).
904:978-981-256-621-8
877:978-0-19-934752-0
669:978-1-317-36223-4
642:978-1-62356-897-9
476:Cascading failure
383:miserable failure
297:Patricia G. Smith
247:system spread to
16:(Redirected from
1433:
1400:
1348:
1301:
1256:
1255:
1253:
1251:
1245:Montreal Gazette
1236:
1230:
1229:
1227:
1225:
1203:
1197:
1196:
1194:
1192:
1170:
1164:
1163:
1161:
1159:
1134:
1123:
1122:
1120:
1118:
1101:
1095:
1094:
1076:
1052:
1046:
1045:
1027:
1009:
1000:
994:
993:
975:
965:
941:
935:
934:
932:
930:
915:
909:
908:
888:
882:
881:
849:
843:
837:
831:
825:
819:
813:
807:
806:
796:
756:
750:
749:
725:
719:
718:
680:
674:
673:
653:
647:
646:
626:
620:
614:
608:
602:
596:
595:
580:
558:
535:Normal Accidents
500:Failure analysis
389:", which caused
360:magazine editor
131:
21:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1426:Social concepts
1411:
1410:
1386:
1383:
1359:Perrow, Charles
1355:
1353:Further reading
1304:
1290:
1268:
1260:
1259:
1249:
1247:
1238:
1237:
1233:
1223:
1221:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1190:
1188:
1172:
1171:
1167:
1157:
1155:
1136:
1135:
1126:
1116:
1114:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1007:
1002:
1001:
997:
943:
942:
938:
928:
926:
917:
916:
912:
905:
890:
889:
885:
878:
851:
850:
846:
838:
834:
826:
822:
814:
810:
758:
757:
753:
727:
726:
722:
682:
681:
677:
670:
655:
654:
650:
643:
628:
627:
623:
615:
611:
603:
599:
582:
581:
577:
572:
567:
562:System accident
556:
465:
403:
391:Google searches
379:
346:Albert Einstein
330:
316:
275:
265:
214:
208:
192:
173:Box-office bomb
168:dot-com company
142:
134:individualistic
129:
106:
50:
39:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1439:
1437:
1429:
1428:
1423:
1413:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1402:
1382:
1381:External links
1379:
1378:
1377:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1315:(2): 159–176.
1302:
1288:
1258:
1257:
1231:
1198:
1165:
1124:
1096:
1047:
995:
936:
910:
903:
883:
876:
862:. p. 32.
844:
832:
830:, p. 160.
820:
818:, p. 159.
808:
771:(2): 159–166.
751:
720:
675:
668:
648:
641:
621:
609:
597:
574:
573:
571:
568:
566:
565:
559:
550:
544:
538:
532:
526:
523:Market failure
520:
515:
509:
503:
497:
491:
485:
479:
473:
466:
464:
461:
415:Internet memes
402:
399:
395:George W. Bush
387:Google bombing
378:
375:
315:
312:
273:Omission (law)
264:
261:
207:
204:
191:
188:
180:cult following
176:
175:
170:
164:dot-com bubble
160:
141:
138:
128:man 'a failure
105:
102:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1438:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1416:
1406:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1375:0-691-00412-9
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1357:
1356:
1352:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1271:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:Other sources
1246:
1242:
1235:
1232:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1209:
1202:
1199:
1186:
1182:
1181:
1176:
1169:
1166:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1143:
1139:
1133:
1131:
1129:
1125:
1113:
1112:
1107:
1100:
1097:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1075:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1051:
1048:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1026:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1006:
999:
996:
991:
987:
983:
979:
974:
973:11250/3035859
969:
964:
959:
955:
951:
947:
940:
937:
924:
920:
914:
911:
906:
900:
896:
895:
887:
884:
879:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
856:
848:
845:
841:
836:
833:
829:
824:
821:
817:
812:
809:
804:
800:
795:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
762:
755:
752:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
724:
721:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
679:
676:
671:
665:
662:. Routledge.
661:
660:
652:
649:
644:
638:
634:
633:
625:
622:
618:
613:
610:
607:, p. 12.
606:
601:
598:
593:
589:
585:
579:
576:
569:
563:
560:
554:
551:
548:
545:
542:
539:
536:
533:
530:
527:
524:
521:
519:
516:
513:
510:
507:
504:
501:
498:
495:
492:
489:
486:
483:
480:
477:
474:
471:
468:
467:
462:
460:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:
440:
436:
435:
430:
426:
425:
420:
416:
412:
408:
400:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
376:
374:
372:
368:
363:
359:
358:
353:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
329:
325:
321:
313:
311:
309:
304:
302:
298:
294:
292:
286:
284:
280:
274:
270:
263:In philosophy
262:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
213:
205:
203:
199:
196:
189:
187:
185:
181:
174:
171:
169:
165:
161:
159:
155:
154:
153:
149:
147:
139:
137:
135:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
110:Scott Sandage
103:
101:
99:
93:
91:
90:zero-sum game
87:
83:
79:
75:
69:
65:
61:
56:
52:
48:
44:
37:
33:
19:
1395:
1362:
1312:
1306:
1274:
1262:
1261:
1248:. Retrieved
1244:
1234:
1222:. Retrieved
1211:
1201:
1189:. Retrieved
1180:The Guardian
1178:
1168:
1156:. Retrieved
1145:
1115:. Retrieved
1109:
1099:
1064:
1060:
1050:
1015:
1011:
998:
953:
949:
939:
927:. Retrieved
923:the original
913:
893:
886:
854:
847:
835:
823:
811:
768:
764:
754:
737:
733:
723:
690:
684:
678:
658:
651:
631:
624:
617:Sandage 2006
612:
605:Sandage 2006
600:
587:
578:
529:Murphy's law
512:Failure rate
506:Failure mode
442:
434:Blazing Star
432:
423:
422:
418:
411:interjection
406:
404:
380:
370:
367:null results
356:
354:
331:
305:
295:
287:
276:
256:
252:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
218:
215:
206:In education
200:
193:
190:In marketing
177:
150:
143:
117:
107:
94:
73:
72:
51:
1388:Zimmer, Ben
1138:Zimmer, Ben
377:Linguistics
362:Kevin Kelly
334:experiments
291:blameworthy
140:In business
86:competition
1415:Categories
1407:from Japan
1208:"Epic Win"
1111:Snopes.com
858:. Oxford:
840:Smith 1990
828:Smith 1990
816:Smith 1990
570:References
457:fail whale
429:Ben Zimmer
381:The term "
318:See also:
314:In science
267:See also:
225:percentage
210:See also:
202:esteem)".
114:bankruptcy
98:heuristics
1345:170763594
1329:0031-8116
1298:436295765
1224:21 August
1091:233890960
1083:2053-9517
1042:250180452
1034:2053-9517
990:253026358
982:2053-9517
785:1931-7913
746:2326-0351
715:220628355
707:0022-2437
494:Fail-safe
444:Fail Blog
439:game over
424:epic fail
301:negligent
195:Marketing
126:insolvent
122:Civil War
104:Sociology
78:objective
1369:, 1999.
1272:(2006).
1218:Archived
1191:9 August
1185:Archived
1158:9 August
1152:Archived
1117:9 August
803:26086649
592:Archived
482:Disaster
463:See also
279:analytic
231:through
184:coolness
18:Failures
1421:Failure
1337:4320126
929:24 June
794:4041495
453:Twitter
449:hashtag
146:product
82:success
74:Failure
1373:
1343:
1335:
1327:
1296:
1286:
1250:21 May
1089:
1081:
1040:
1032:
988:
980:
901:
874:
801:
791:
783:
744:
713:
705:
666:
639:
326:, and
283:ethics
166:, see
68:Ladakh
66:road,
1341:S2CID
1333:JSTOR
1213:Slate
1087:S2CID
1038:S2CID
1008:(PDF)
986:S2CID
740:(1).
711:S2CID
488:Error
357:Wired
235:with
118:being
88:or a
64:Nubra
1371:ISBN
1325:ISSN
1294:OCLC
1284:ISBN
1252:2010
1226:2009
1193:2009
1160:2009
1119:2009
1079:ISSN
1030:ISSN
978:ISSN
931:2014
899:ISBN
872:ISBN
799:PMID
781:ISSN
742:ISSN
703:ISSN
664:ISBN
637:ISBN
419:fail
407:fail
308:norm
271:and
45:and
34:and
1317:doi
1069:doi
1020:doi
968:hdl
958:doi
864:doi
789:PMC
773:doi
695:doi
459:".
348:'s
62:to
60:Leh
1417::
1394:,
1361:.
1339:.
1331:.
1323:.
1313:59
1311:.
1292:.
1282:.
1243:.
1216:.
1210:.
1183:.
1177:.
1150:.
1144:.
1127:^
1108:.
1085:.
1077:.
1063:.
1059:.
1036:.
1028:.
1014:.
1010:.
984:.
976:.
966:.
952:.
948:.
870:.
797:.
787:.
779:.
769:13
767:.
763:.
736:.
732:.
709:.
701:.
691:36
689:.
590:.
586:.
397:.
352:.
322:,
233:E,
186:.
1401:.
1347:.
1319::
1300:.
1254:.
1228:.
1195:.
1162:.
1121:.
1093:.
1071::
1065:8
1044:.
1022::
1016:9
992:.
970::
960::
954:9
933:.
907:.
880:.
866::
805:.
775::
748:.
738:7
717:.
697::
672:.
645:.
257:E
253:F
245:E
243:–
241:A
237:E
229:A
130:'
49:.
38:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
