154:, conducted a study applying the apparent-time hypothesis. The study, carried out in central Canada, examined the sociolinguistic variable (wh), where the unvoiced labiovelar glide /hw/ loses phonemic status and merges with the corresponding voiced glide /w/. In this study, the oldest subjects seem to indicate a stable period for this variable, both the 70- to 79-year-olds and those over 80 used the voiced variant where the unvoiced was "expected" 38.3 and 37.7% of the time, respectively. Each subsequent younger age cohort (10 years) shows a greater percentage of /w/ usage, with those 20–29 using /w/ 87.6% of the time and the teenagers using it 90.6% of the time. Notice that the deltas between the oldest two groups and between the youngest two groups are relatively small, 0.6% and 3.0%. Between these two extremes the rate of change between the groups is quite high, approximately 10% per age cohort. This pattern can be described as an initial stable period, followed by a period of rapid change, and a tailing off as the change nears completion. This
174:'house'. The synonyms had a high-frequency variation between the first and second halves of the 20th century. A correlation was found between semantic variation and age, in which the older group judged the synonyms more similar than the younger group. This shows that variation in semantic representations reflect semantic change instead of an age-grading phenomenon. This would be confirmed by real-time studies.
202:
in progress, showing that the centralization of diphthongs on the island is about to decline in younger age groups. On the other hand, Labov discovered that young inhabitants, who left the island for work or study, showed an increase of centralizing diphthongs after they returned, which was explained
93:
The apparent-time hypothesis allows sociolinguists the convenience of gathering data at one point in time or analyzing past data from historical linguistic studies that cannot be replicated. For real-time sociolinguistics, the same participants of the study must be recruited and tested at later times
28:
is studied by comparing the speech of individuals of different ages. If language change is taking place, the apparent-time hypothesis assumes that older generations will represent an earlier form of the language and that younger generations will represent a later form. Thus, by comparing younger and
132:
Boberg compares apparent-time data on
Montreal English with real-time data from earlier studies of the same community. A comparison was made between the 1972 survey by Scargill and Warkentyne and the more recent study in 1998-99 by Chambers. Real-time comparisons were made between the student group
76:
The most direct way of investigating a population's usage of linguistic variants is through surveys and interviews. In the case of apparent-time studies, surveys are conducted in a population across a broad age range to investigate the linguistic variants across a broad age spectrum. Theoretically,
169:
The apparent-time hypothesis has been applied in studies involving statistical analyses of semantic similarity judgements. J.P. Magué performed a study with native French speakers with mean ages of 21 years and 56 years. The study measured semantic variation among the speakers to create a semantic
136:
The results reveal that some age-correlated lexical variables show stability over speakers' lifetimes, which would suggest ongoing change, but others show a change in progress over the speakers' lifetimes. However, the nature of individual change is generally found to be not the rejection of new
107:
The use of the apparent-time hypothesis in sociolinguistics is criticized for its insufficient informative value concerning an actual language change in progress. The results, if the study reflects a variation within different age groups, may be read as an ongoing language change or merely an
43:
Apparent-time analysis assumes that most features of language are acquired during childhood and remain relatively unchanged throughout an individual's lifetime once that individual is past a certain age. Therefore, a speaker's speech is a reflection of speech patterns acquired during language
193:
in 1961, were the linguistic variables (ay) and (aw) in the speech of the islanders. The findings showed that the highest rate of centralization could be seen in the group of middle-age islanders from 31 to 45. Next highest rates were to be seen within the group of 46 to 60 years old. The
57:
The apparent-time hypothesis depends on several assumptions: a significantly broad sample is taken to be representative of the population, and vernacular speech is relatively stable in a given individual after adolescence. Apparent-time studies are examples of
80:
Data gathered from real-time sociolinguistics studies can also be used for apparent-time sociolinguistics. However, apparent-time data are only a surrogate for real-time evidence and care must be made before they are considered to represent
133:
in 1972 to the 14–19 age group in 1999 and the parents from 1972 to the 40–49 age group in 1999. To make direct comparisons, data from 1999 were restricted to the real and project age categories of the 1972 study.
203:
by social factors. In fact, the study can rather be seen as a further point of intersection, where the apparent-time hypothesis comes across with the controversy of the hypothesis of
177:
The apparent time hypothesis has yet to be verified for semantic studies; however age-grading does not adequately explain why the semantic variation between ages occurs.
124:. The apparent-time hypothesis is often assumed when it is not feasible to conduct real-time studies because of reasons such as time constraints and limited data.
65:
Within the population, age-stratified variation is assumed to reflect the ages at which members of the population learned language. It is often contrasted with
137:
variants by older speakers, as associated with the age-grading model, but the late adoption of new variants by adults who learned older variants as children.
331:
Tagliamonte, Sali A.; D'Arcy, Alexandra (2007). "Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations".
94:
to validate the data, which is a method that is difficult to implement. However, real-time corpora can also be used for apparent-time analyses.
207:, in which "individuals change their linguistic behavior throughout their lifetimes, but the community as a whole does not change.".
447:
437:
112:
within the tested network, which can have various reasons and does not necessarily indicate an actual language change.
384:
Boberg, Charles (2004). "Real and
Apparent Time in Language Change: Late Adoption of Changes in Montreal English".
121:
66:
37:
432:
442:
232:
151:
221:
195:
59:
226:
216:
204:
186:
109:
70:
347:
33:
155:
36:, which examines the state of the language at a particular point in time. That contrasts with
393:
359:
278:
21:
237:
199:
25:
426:
242:
190:
158:
pattern has been identified as characteristic for many types of linguistic changes.
397:
363:
82:
170:
field by analyzing the speakers' judgements of synonyms for the French word
283:
266:
271:
Proceedings of the 32nd Annual
Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
40:, which compares data from two points in time to observe change directly.
62:
in which a population group is examined at a certain point in time.
29:
older speakers, the direction of language change can be detected.
301:
Chambers, J.K. (2002). "Patterns of
Variation including Change".
77:
patterns of use should differ between different age groups.
303:
The
Handbook of Language Variation and Change (Pp 358-361)
198:
of the analyzed variables can be seen as an indicator of
120:
Apparent-time sociolinguistics is often contrasted with
32:
The apparent-time method allows change to be studied by
318:The Handbook of Language Variation and Change
8:
296:
294:
282:
116:Comparison to real-time sociolinguistics
413:The Social Motivation of a Sound Change
260:
258:
254:
7:
267:"Semantic Changes in Apparent Time"
14:
20:is a methodological construct in
348:"Sociolinguistics in Real Time"
180:
1:
346:Dannenberg, Clare J. (2000).
333:Language Variation and Change
320:. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
265:Magué, Jean-Phillipe (2006).
464:
122:real-time sociolinguistics
38:real-time sociolinguistics
398:10.1215/00031283-79-3-250
364:10.1215/00031283-75-3-254
185:Point of interest in the
85:linguistic developments.
448:Sociological terminology
233:Jack Chambers (linguist)
229:(historical linguistics)
69:, which are examples of
18:apparent-time hypothesis
411:Labov, William (1972).
222:Cross-sectional studies
181:Martha's Vineyard study
60:cross-sectional studies
438:Methods in linguistics
284:10.3765/bls.v32i1.3459
227:Diachronic linguistics
44:learning as a child.
316:Bailey, Guy (2002).
217:Age-graded variation
205:age-graded variation
189:study, conducted by
110:age-graded variation
71:longitudinal studies
146:Canadian (wh) study
34:synchronic analysis
150:Canadian linguist
187:Martha's Vineyard
108:expression of an
67:real-time studies
455:
433:Sociolinguistics
417:
416:
408:
402:
401:
381:
375:
374:
372:
370:
343:
337:
336:
328:
322:
321:
313:
307:
306:
298:
289:
288:
286:
262:
128:Montreal English
22:sociolinguistics
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
454:
453:
452:
443:Age and society
423:
422:
421:
420:
410:
409:
405:
386:American Speech
383:
382:
378:
368:
366:
352:American Speech
345:
344:
340:
330:
329:
325:
315:
314:
310:
300:
299:
292:
264:
263:
256:
251:
238:Language change
213:
200:language change
194:age-stratified
183:
167:
148:
143:
130:
118:
105:
100:
91:
55:
50:
26:language change
12:
11:
5:
461:
459:
451:
450:
445:
440:
435:
425:
424:
419:
418:
403:
392:(3): 250–269.
376:
358:(3): 254–257.
338:
335:(19): 199–217.
323:
308:
290:
253:
252:
250:
247:
246:
245:
240:
235:
230:
224:
219:
212:
209:
182:
179:
166:
160:
147:
144:
142:
139:
129:
126:
117:
114:
104:
101:
99:
96:
90:
87:
54:
51:
49:
46:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
460:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
428:
414:
407:
404:
399:
395:
391:
387:
380:
377:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
342:
339:
334:
327:
324:
319:
312:
309:
304:
297:
295:
291:
285:
280:
276:
272:
268:
261:
259:
255:
248:
244:
243:William Labov
241:
239:
236:
234:
231:
228:
225:
223:
220:
218:
215:
214:
210:
208:
206:
201:
197:
192:
191:William Labov
188:
178:
175:
173:
164:
161:
159:
157:
153:
152:J.K. Chambers
145:
140:
138:
134:
127:
125:
123:
115:
113:
111:
102:
98:Controversies
97:
95:
88:
86:
84:
78:
74:
72:
68:
63:
61:
52:
47:
45:
41:
39:
35:
30:
27:
23:
19:
415:. Chapter 1.
412:
406:
389:
385:
379:
367:. Retrieved
355:
351:
341:
332:
326:
317:
311:
302:
274:
270:
184:
176:
171:
168:
162:
149:
141:Case studies
135:
131:
119:
106:
92:
79:
75:
64:
56:
42:
31:
17:
15:
53:Methodology
427:Categories
369:23 October
249:References
103:Criticisms
83:diachronic
196:variation
211:See also
48:Overview
24:whereby
277:: 227.
156:S-curve
172:maison
163:Maison
89:Merits
165:study
371:2013
16:The
394:doi
360:doi
279:doi
429::
390:79
388:.
356:75
354:.
350:.
293:^
275:32
273:.
269:.
257:^
73:.
400:.
396::
373:.
362::
305:.
287:.
281::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.